Pre-election and post-election reportage
weaves a tapestry of fiction and fantasy.
State Department functionaries had overthrown elected pro-Russian regimes in the Ukraine, Georgia and as far afield as Libya.
These were the unfettered joys of the US unipolar rulers and their stable of prestigious press pimps and academics, until Putin arrived to spoil the party.
And in the run-up to the US election, the Clintonites and their Democratic entourage in the media launched the most frenzied demonic attack accusing Vladimir Putin,
If there is one sliver of truth in the
vassal press, it is that the demonic changes made against Putin
reflected the gory reality of Hillary Clinton's well-documented
But Vladimir Putin was elected repeatedly by huge majorities and his governance has been far more representative of the Russian electorate than those of the recidivist loser, Hillary Clinton.
Russia didn't 'invade' the Ukraine or Crimea.
It was the 'potty-mouthed'
Nuland, US Undersecretary of State for European Affairs, who
boasted of having tossed a mere 5 billion dollars into
neo-fascist-kleptocratic putsch that took over Ukraine and who
famously dismissed the concerns of the European Union… with her
secretly recorded 'F... the EU' comment to the US Ambassador!
On the other hand, Clinton was bankrolled by,
The mass media, the,
...dutifully served the same stale, old sexist gossip about Trump in support of the sweet and sour, wide-eyed Madam Strangelove, who never hesitated to rip the lives out of thousands of Muslim women in their own countries.
The media celebrated Madame Clinton's
nuclear option for Syria (the 'No-Fly Zone') while it ridiculed
Trump's proposal to negotiate a settlement with Putin.
Given the choice, most women would prefer to defend themselves from the stupid words of a vulgar misogynist over the threat of a Clinton-Obama predator drone ripping their families to shreds.
Nasty, juvenile words do not compare
with a history of bloody war crimes.
...than to analyze the consequences of Madame Candidate Clinton's policies.
The mass media, subservient to Clinton, wave the flag of 'worker struggles' and highlight 'capitalist exploitation' when they describe China, Russia and the businesses of US President-Elect Trump.
But their perspective is that of the 'Uni-Polar Empire'. They cite non-unionized worker protests in Chinese factories and peasants fighting the rapacious developers.
They heap praise on the,
...terrorists as "freedom fighters" and "liberators".
They fail to acknowledge that, as bad as worker exploitation is in these examples, it is far less horrific than the suffering experienced by millions of local and immigrant peasants and workers who have been injured, killed and rendered jobless and homeless by US bombing campaigns in Libya and US invasion-destruction of Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria.
The imperial media's phony
'anti-capitalist-exploiter stories' against Trump, Putin and the
Chinese are mere propaganda rhetoric designed to entice leftists,
influence liberals and reinforce conservatives by playing on
workers' plight inflicted by national adversaries instead of
imperial conquests and egregious crimes against humanity.
Their weekend cultural pages may occasionally contain a critique of some predatory financiers next to a special feature on an unusual sculptor or successful upwardly mobile immigrant writer.
Day after day, the same financial media publishes predictable 'boot-lickerish' masquerading as reports on vulture capitalists, warmongers and imperial warlords.
They court and offer advice to,
They write in blubbering awe at the bold multi-billion dollar mergers and acquisitions, which eliminate competitive prices and establish effective monopolies.
Then they deftly turn to rant against President-Elect Donald Trump's pronouncements on workers' rights - he is,
The fear and loathing of the 'Wildman' Trump, so evident in the four most prestigious English language newspapers, is nowhere to be found in reference to Secretary Clinton's pathological glee over the gruesome torture-murder of the injured President Gadhafi by her allied jihadi tribesmen.
The global and domestic implications of the US Secretary of State expressing glee and high pitched squeals on viewing the filmed torture and final 'coup de grace' on the wounded head of the Libyan President was never analyzed in the respectable press:
Instead, the press superficially covers the plight of millions of immigrants and refugees who would never have left their jobs and homes were it not for the US destruction of the Middle East and North Africa.
The respectable media defend the US
officials directly responsible for the plight of these migrants
flooding and threatening to destabilize Europe.
'Angry white male workers' constituted only a fraction of the Trump electorate.
Trump received the vote of large sections of suburban middle class,
...joined by downwardly mobile,
A majority of white women voted for Trump.
City household residents, still trying to recover from the Obama-Clinton era mortgage foreclosures, formed an important segment of the Trump majority, as did underpaid university and community college graduates - despairing of ever finding long-term stable employment.
In short, low-paid, exploited and
precarious business owners and service sector employees formed a
larger section of the Trump majority than the stereotyped
'deplorable angry white racists' embedded in the media and
Most have been white students, Democratic Party activists and Soros-financed NGOs.
Their demonstrations have been far smaller than the huge pro-Trump public rallies during the campaign. The pro-Clinton media, which consistently ignored the size of Trump's rallies, doesn't bother to make any comparison.
They have focused exclusively on the
post-election protest, completely papering over the outrageous
manipulation by which the Democratic National Committee under
'Debbie' Wasserman Schultz cheated Clinton's wildly popular
left-wing rival, Bernie Sanders, during the primaries.
Many politically conscious African-American and Latino women knew that Clinton was deeply involved in policies that deported 2 million immigrant workers and family members between 2009-2014 and destroyed the lives of millions of women of color in North and Central Africa because of her war against the government of Libya.
For millions of female and male workers, as well as immigrants - there was a 'lesser evil' - Trump.
For them, the Donald's nasty remarks
about women and Mexicans were less disturbing than the real history
of Hillary Clinton's brutal wars destroying women of color in Africa
and the Middle East and her savage policies against immigrants.
These venomous propagandists slapped the Manhattan real-estate mogul Trump with an odd assortment of labels:
The Minnesota Senator and former comedian Al Franken described Trump's critique against Wall Street Bankers and finance capital as 'dog whistles' for anti-Semites, labeling the candidate as a 21st century disseminator of the 'Protocols of Zion'.
Senator Franken darkly hinted that 'rogue' (anti-Semitic) agents had infiltrated the FBI and were working to undermine Israel's favorite, Clinton.
He even promised to initiate a post-election purge of the FBI… upon Clinton's victory…
Needless to say, the Senator's own rant, published (and quickly buried) two days before the election in the Guardian, did not help Madame Hillary with the security apparatus in the United States.
History has never been a strong point with the Comedian Senator Al Franken, who should have know better than to threaten the deep security state:
The accusations of anti-Semitism against Trump were baseless and desperate:
The ADL directors, who have raked in
over $3 million dollar salaries over the past 5 years 'protecting'
US Jews, objected to Trump because Hillary Clinton was the darling
of the pro-war Israel-First lobbies and Obama-Clinton appointees.
These hysterical slanders against 'Trump the Anti-Semite' reflect the fact that the most prominent domestic Jewish power bloc, 'the 52 Presidents of American Jewish Organization' had invested heavily in Hillary Clinton...
No matter what the cost, no matter what the land grab, no matter how many Palestinians were 'killed or maimed by Jewish settler-vigilantes'; the State of Israel could always count on Clinton's unconditional support.
The Lobby would not need to 'petition'
their 'First Woman' President; Madame Hillary would have anticipated
Israel's every desire and even embellished their rhetoric.
Influential Zionist organizations turned
their backs on the Senator Comedian; the Zionist Organization of
America reprimanded the ADL for its intemperate slanders - sensing
that Clinton could lose.
The FBI's release of damaging documents
related to Secretary Clinton undermined the ADL's candidate in the
run-up to the election and hinted at an interesting power struggle
behind the curtains.
The Netanyahu Cabinet put distance between themselves and their favorites, probably telling AIPAC leaders to muzzle Al Franken and pretend his threats to purge the FBI had never been launched.
They were clearly worried that their
lunatic attack dogs could set the entire US Security State on a
hostile track against Israel.
She even briefly accused the FBI of ruining her candidacy - hinting at some partial but oversimplified truth.
A Zionist darling to the end, Hillary
would never dare to identify and castigate the crazy and incompetent
Zionist provocateurs that had helped to turn the Deep State against
None of the 52 leading Zionist
organizations would join the street protests.