by Alfred Lambremont Webre
Seattle Exopolitics Examiner
April 29th, 2011
from
Examiner Website
In an exclusive April 29, 2011 interview on ExopoliticsTV (below video) with Alfred
Lambremont Webre, Robert Stanley, weekly correspondent for the Washington
Times investigative radio, states that the purported birth certificate
released by U.S. President
Barack H. Obama on April 27, 2011 is a forensic
forgery.
In the interview, Mr. Stanley's statement is accompanied by an
on-camera demonstration of various forgeries within the nine overlaid
digital layers of the birth certificate document as released on the White
House website.
Earlier on April 29, 2011, Mr. Stanley reported the breaking news (listen
below media) regarding
the forensic fraud in Mr. Obama's newly released birth certificate on
Washington Times investigative radio's America's Morning News while being
interviewed by reporters John McCaslin and Amy Holmes, also a commentator
for CNN.
During his ExopoliticsTV interview Mr. Stanley indicated that the White
House has in fact taken down Mr. Obama’s alleged recently released birth
certificate from the White House website overnight (see
here), although the
White House has left a copy of the alleged birth certificate of Mr. Obama
(below image.)
Origin
As of this writing, Mr. Stanley stated there had been no overt comment from
the White House other than the taking of the birth certificate offline.
Neither officials of the Hawaii state birth registrar nor of the Honolulu
hospital where Mr. Obama allegedly was born have, as yet, commented.
Mr. Stanley stated that the headquarters of Donald Trump had put him in
touch directly with Mr. Trump, and that he had forwarded the evidence of
forensic forgery in Mr. Obama’s birth certificate directly to Mr. Trump.
Donald Trump, a possible contender for the 2012 Republican nomination for
U.S. President, stated on April 27, 2011 that he considers himself
instrumental in forcing Mr. Obama to release the alleged birth certificate,
and now apparent forensic fraud.
Washington Times report
Newly released Obama birth certificate forensic forgery
During this 25 minute ExopoliticsTV interview, Mr. Stanley graphically
demonstrates using copies of various of the nine overlaid digital layers
within the forensically fraudulent birth certificate of Mr. Obama that the
birth certificate was assembled as a forged document, using components of
many other documents.
Robert Stanley’s conclusions
...congruent with other independent research on
forensic fraud in Obama birth certificate
Robert M. Stanley’s conclusions are also congruent with other independent
analyses of Mr. Obama’s alleged birth certificate released April 27, 2011,
including the following:
Video#1
Barack Obama's Birth Certificate...
Is a Digitally Layered Photoshop Fake
Video#2
Proof Obama's 4/27/11 "Long Form Certificate of Birth"
...is Forged!
Video#3
Obama Birth Certificate Scam?
2011-04-27 Obama
Other anomalies in the forensically forged Obama birth certificate
Researchers have identified a number of anomalies on the alleged birth
certificate of Mr. Obama, apart from the evidence of forensic forgery
provided by analysis of its nine layers.
One researcher states (see Video#1 above),
"Look at the hospital name on this document [Mr.
Obama's alleged birth certificate]. The hospital had a different name in
1961, it was not named Kapiolani Maternity and Gynocological Hospital, it
was called Kaokiolani Children's Hospital. It did not get the Kapiolani name
until the mid-1970s when they merged.
Kenya was not called 'Kenya' in 1961
it was called 'The British East Africa Protectorate' at the time Obama was
born and this document was supposedly printed. Then in 1963 it became 'The
Dominion of Kenya'. Then later on became the 'Republic of Kenya'."
Another researcher
states,
"I’m not going to say that the information on the
document is bogus, but I can definitely, without hesitation, say that the
document was originally a two-layer piece. The top layer is the ‘black’ part
that came from a scanner as a grayscale scan. It was converted to black and
white and the white part was made transparent.
"That was dropped onto a generic green watermark background, which is what
makes it look official. But that was NOT on the original document as
scanned. This is very evident by the white haloing around everything black.
It is also extremely evident that a layer was dropped onto the green
background because the green marks are very crisp in the areas around the
edges of the image, but are very blurred where the black image block covers
it.
"Now keep in mind that before the green background was added, the original
scan could have easily been altered, dates or names changed. I’m not saying
it was. I’m just saying it’s a 100% fact that it could have been. So, this
document as we see it is still not proof of anything. I could easily
recreate this document with someone else’s original Hawaii birth certificate
and a generic watermark background."
Another researcher
writes,
"Jerome Corsi writes that the issue represents
the 'Rosetta Stone' of deciphering both Obama’s previously released
short-form Certification of Live Birth and the newly released purported copy
of his long-form birth certificate.”
"It centers around the fact that two twins born in the same Kapi’olani
hospital listed on the Obama document the day after Obama was purportedly
born actually have birth certificate numbers lower than Obama. The number
should be lower on the Obama certificate if he was born before the twins."
"As Corsi explains,
'Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m.
Hawaii time Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151-61-10637,
which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.'
'Gretchen Nordyke, the second twin, was born at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time Aug.
5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151-61-10638, which was also
filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.'
“Yet, according to the Certification of Live Birth displayed by
FactCheck.org during the 2008 presidential campaign - and now according to
the long-form birth certificate the White House released today - Barack
Obama was given a higher certificate number than the Nordykes.”
“Note, Obama was given certificate No. 151-61-10641, even though he
was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was
registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days
earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.”
Why was a forged Obama Hawaii birth certificate necessary?
The forgery of Barack Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate appears to have been
made necessary by U.S. immigration and naturalization law in the period
between 1953 and 1986.
Proof Obama Admits He Was Born In Kenya
Between Dec. 24, 1953 and Nov. 13, 1986, an individual born abroad to a U.S.
citizen parent married to an alien could be a “natural born citizen” only if
the U.S. citizen parent had lived in the U.S. continuously for 10 years,
five of which were after their 14th birthday.
Barack Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born on November 29, 1942.
Obama was allegedly born on August 4, 1961. Thus, by prevailing U.S. law,
Barack Obama could not have been a “natural born U.S. citizen.”
If he was
born in Kenya, Mr. Obama's mother was only 18 and could not have lived in
the U.S. five years after her 14th birthday at the time of his birth.
Thus, it became a political necessity for Barack Obama to have a U.S. birth
certificate. A forged birth certificate may have been produced in this case
on April 27, 2011 because a genuine one does not exist despite the fact that
the President was born in Hawaii or does not exist because he was born
overseas.
For Barack Obama to have become a U.S. citizen under prevailing U.S. law at
the time of his birth in 1961, his mother would have had to petition a U.S.
immigration court for a naturalized U.S. citizenship status, which would
have been readily granted to him because he was born of an American mother.
However, by the tragic timing of his birth taking place a few months short
of his mother’s having lived in the U.S. for five years continuously after
her 14th birthday, Barack Obama never achieved “natural born citizen” status
and was as a matter of law constitutionally ineligible for the U.S.
Presidency.
It is an established fact that Mr. Obama acquired Indonesian citizenship
when his mother married Indonesian national Lolo Soetoro, who adopted Mr.
Obama and moved his family to Indonesia in 1967. Indonesia requires that its
citizens renounce all other citizenships.
There is no record, however, that after she sent Mr. Obama to live with his
grandparents in Hawaii in 1971 or divorced Mr. Soetero Mr. Obama’s mother
ever petitioned for U.S. nationalization of Mr. Obama.
Thus, it is most
plausible that Mr. Obama was an Indonesian citizen,
-
when he returned to live
with his grandparents in Hawaii in 1971
-
when he matriculated to Occidental
College in Hawaii in 1979
-
when he ran for the U.S. Senate in January 2003
-
when he declared for U.S. President on
February 10, 2007
Thus, as a matter of law, even a valid birth certificate showing that Mr.
Obama was born on August 4, 1961 in Hawaii would not suffice to grant Barack
Obama the “natural born” status he requires to be U.S. President, absent a
special statue of the U.S. Congress as was granted his 2008 Presidential
rival John McCain.
Ironically, in 1986, this U.S. immigration and naturalization law was
changed to grant John McCain “natural born” status despite his having been
born in the U.S. Panama Canal Zone.
The law change permits an individual
born overseas to a U.S. parent married to an alien to acquire “natural born”
status when born overseas in specific U.S. related facilities and
territories.
Why such a clumsy forensic forgery in a Presidential birth certificate?
During his interview, Mr. Stanley was asked to speculate on the reason for
such a clumsy forensic forgery in a Presidential birth certificate, as many
independent researchers are speculating on this question.
A
recent poll
indicates that more than 60% of U.S. adults believe that Barack Obama was
not born in the U.S., thus potentially disqualifying him to be U.S.
President.
Mr. Stanley responded that there are many possible scenarios for a clumsy
forensic forgery. One scenario was that Mr. Obama was “set up” intentionally
by other parties to release a fraudulent birth certificate to embarrass him
politically.
Another scenario was that the parties that colluded in
producing the fraudulent birth certificate were careless and produced a
second-rate forgery that could be broken by anyone with a working knowledge
of Adobe Illustrator.
Is Barack Obama the next Richard Nixon?
In his ExopoliticsTV interview (far
above video), Robert Stanley calls for a Congressional
investigation of the apparent forensically fraudulent birth certificate of
Mr. Obama.
The White House, and federal agencies such as the FBI and Justice
Department, have proved incapable of independently investigating this
possible impeachable offence. The production of a fraudulent birth
certificate for the purpose of qualifying for U.S. Presidential office would
be a “high crime or misdemeanor” under the impeachment clause of the U.S.
constitution.
The historical analogy that occurred to Mr. Stanley and to other reporters
such as
Amy Holmes while interviewing Mr. Stanley today for the
Washington
Times was that of former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon.
Mr. Nixon resigned the U.S. Presidency on August 9, 1974 in the face of
likely impeachment resulting from the Watergate break-in on June 17, 1972,
as a result on an alert security guard who discovered a taped door left
unlocked by the
Watergate burglars that Nixon himself had sent to steal
political intelligence from the Democratic party headquarters at the
Watergate Hotel.
By analogy, the carelessness of the forged birth certificate of Mr. Obama
could be compared to the carelessness of the Watergate burglars who, by
leaving the office door to the Democratic headquarters taped, tipped off a
security guard that a Presidential-directed illegal search was afoot, which
eventually brought the Nixon presidency down.
Is Barack Obama's birth certificate a distraction
...from his quantum access
time travel pre-identification secret?
Robert Stanley and mainstream media journalists such as CNN commentator Amy
Holmes agree that the potential significance of the forensic fraud of Mr.
Obama’s, if validated, could go beyond the political repercussions of even
Watergate.
There appears to be another hidden factor beyond the location of Mr. Obama’s
birth that is at play here - quantum access time travel pre-identification
of recent U.S. Presidents, including Barack Obama.
The CIA has been
pre-identifying future U.S. Presidents such as Barack Obama for 40 years and
has, by the evidence, co-opted each of them into CIA.
This secret quantum access program controls the U.S. presidency and makes
the United States a functional CIA dictatorship.
As this reporter
has written, the eyewitness evidence of whistleblower
Andrew D. Basiago, the attorney in Washington State who was a participant in
the secret DARPA-administered
Project Pegasus that developed Tesla
technology-based "quantum access" to to past and future events, indicates
that it is likely that by 1982 Mr. Obama had been personally informed by CIA
that he was destined to be the U.S. President inaugurated on January 20,
2009.
Barack Obama was pre-identified in time
...as U.S. president by secret DARPA
time travel program
The notion that President Obama has had a lifelong affiliation with the CIA
is supported by the revelations of crusading lawyer
Andrew D. Basiago about
a heretofore unknown “quantum access” capability within the US intelligence
community provided by time travel technology.
Mr. Basiago has been identified as a “planetary-level whistleblower” by
the
Web Bot for his account of a secret time-space program, Project Pegasus,
launched by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in the
late 1960’s and early 1970’s.
According to Mr. Basiago, by 1970, Project Pegasus was
teleporting
individuals between locations in time-space via “teleporters” based on the
later works of
Nikola Tesla and also propagating images of past and future
events via “chronovisors” first developed by the Vatican scientists
Pellegrino Ernetti and Pier Maria Gemelli.
These have been used to provide the U.S. president, intelligence community
and military with better information about past and future events by which
to engage in better contingency planning for future events.
In numerous TV and radio interviews, Mr. Basiago has described how, among
other intelligence findings, Project Pegasus was identifying future American
presidents and then approaching them and apprising them of their destinies
as President.
He has described how as a child serving in Project Pegasus in the early
1970’s, he was present at lunches held at La Hacienda restaurant in Old Town
Albuquerque, NM that were attended by project principals and future American
presidents, including,
...shortly
after they were informed that Project Pegasus had found via quantum access
that they would one day serve as President.
In appearances on talk radio’s
Coast to Coast AM with George Noory in 2010
(below video and audio), Mr. Basiago described at length a 1982 meeting with Barack
Obama in Los Angeles in which Mr. Obama also revealed his awareness that he
had been briefed on the fact that the US government had detected that he was
destined to reach the White House (see Part 3 on below video or audio at
00:29:19.)
Coast to Coast AM
Time Travel & Teleportation
Andrew D. Basiago
We can infer from this meeting between Mr. Obama and Mr. Basiago in 1982
that at age 20 Mr.
Obama had already entered into at least a consultative
relationship with
the CIA, because at the time, the US government was the
only country with a time travel capability and the CIA was known to be
collecting the intelligence data about past and future events that Project
Pegasus was gathering via its time travel technologies.
Cui Bono? Who will be U.S. President on January 20, 2013?
The operant question as of this writing is whether Mr. Obama’s quantum
access
time travel controllers have determined that Mr. Obama will be the
individual sworn in as U.S. President on January 20, 2013.
-
If CIA time travel has pre-identified Mr. Obama as U.S. President on January
20, 2013, then the “secret team” behind Mr. Obama may be taking a calculated
risk with the newly released Obama birth certificate that there are enough
Obama supporters in the main stream media through
Operation Mockingbird and
otherwise, and in the population, that the issue “will go away” or can be
argued away on the basis of the technicalities of U.S. immigration and
naturalization law.
-
If, on the other hand, Mr. Obama’s CIA quantum access controllers are aware
through time travel pre-identification that some other individual is to be
sworn in as U.S. President on January 20, 2013, then a crude and obvious
forgery may be a perfect way to commence an internal “coup d’état” with
outcome as yet unknown. Joe Biden, Vice President of the United States, is most
certainly a “natural born” citizen and a party loyalist.
Throughout this entire process, whatever the outcome (whether Mr. Obama
stays or leaves as U.S. President), the principal objectives of the CIA time
travel controllers and their loyal sycophants in the
mainstream media will
be to maintain the secrecy of the CIA's quantum access capability, and their
secret control over the U.S. Presidency.
