by Joseph P. Farrell
July 17, 2018
It began with complaints by U.S. Embassy personnel in Cuba, and then
it spread to China.
They complained of hearing
sometimes just prior to sleeping, and in some instances the noises
were described as "metal grating on metal".
One individual in Cuba,
you'll recall, complained that he could only hear them on his bed.
When he got up and moved, the phenomenon ceased.
This, to my mind, was a
clear indicator of the use of well-known
mind control technologies,
the so-called "voice to skull" microwave technologies. In this
technology, information - usually
brain waves - is modulated on
microwaves, and can thus be "heard" by the audio cortex of a
But now, according to this article shared by Mr. H.B., those attacks
have spread to American personnel around the world:
Technology Being Used to Carry Out the 'Sonic Attacks' Upon U.S.
Diplomats around the World? - The U.S. Navy Developed 'MEDUSA'
in the Early 2000's.
As the article
notes, this technology is actually from the 1970s and the basic idea
is even older than that:
All the way
back in 1975, the American Psychological Association
published a story in which they
reported upon their success of beaming voices into somebody's
head using microwave technology.
Using what they
called "voice to skull" or "V2K", this
story saved over at Archive reports upon 5 different
available electronic harassment technologies.
As Adam Fabio
reported back in September of
2017 over at Hackaday, while the most common theory being passed around about the
'sonic attacks' in Cuba and now China is that some kind of
device is being used, those devices are not small and light nor
are they clandestine yet as he points out in his story, a less
discussed theory is the 'microwave
the Hackaday story:
One theory I haven't seen
passed around much is the microwave auditory effect. This is
a phenomenon where RF energy directed at a human head is
converted to sound perceivable by the target.
The first paper published
about the effect was by Allan H. Frey in 1961. Frey worked
at the General Electric advanced electronics center at
Cornell University in NY.
As one might have
guessed, I have no doubts that these technologies were and are in
play in Cuba and China.
Nor was America the only country pursuing
them, as they were equally being sought by the former Soviet Union,
and as the technology itself is relatively easy to engineer, any
number of countries with the technological infrastructure could
And that last point raises another disturbing
possibility, for not only could such technologies be built by almost
any country, any corporation with the technological
know-how could do so as well.
For that matter, even their use by the
intelligence "community" would be difficult to prevent, for rogue
factions could always do so simply by dint of the
compartmentalization of such agencies; all that would be necessary
is the authorization, which can easily be obtained in a variety of
So the real
who is doing this, and why?
Initially, when the
attacks in Cuba first occurred, I fingered such technologies as the
means, but questioned the "blame Cuba" scenario. While Cuba might
have obtained such technology from Russia, or even produced it on
its own, it had little motivation to use it.
After all, why endanger
the recent reestablishment of relations? It had nothing to gain by
its use. When the attacks spread to China, again, the same scenario
holds, even in the atmosphere of increased tensions with China.
country had little to gain from such attacks, and quite a great deal
to lose if it could ever be proven it was behind them.
Now, however, with
the attacks having spread around the world, we are looking at a very
different scenario than isolated attacks in this or that country.
We're looking at a global phenomenon, and therefore, at a global
network with access to such technology, technology which itself has
been dispersed around the world (or, in yet another scenario,
perhaps broadcast from space-based platforms.)
In either case, this
narrows the list of potential culprits considerably.
countries, obviously, would have a global reach with their
intelligence agencies, and would have access to such technologies.
One may think of "the usual list of powers" here.
Few of them would
have the motivation for doing so however, as the risk is too great.
My suspicion and
high octane speculation remains focused on the one type of actor
that no one wants to think about: a non-state actor with global
reach, and that would have access to the corporations able to
construct such equipment.
My mind returns to those strange
statements made by the Russian economist, Dr. Tatiana Koryagina, in Pravda shortly
9/11, that the USA would soon be
attacked on its own soil, by
a small global network of
very powerful people, with trillions at
July 12, 2001, Page
One report in Pravda also detailed
its own interview with Dr. Koryagina
Here is an excerpt:
All the participants at the hearings stated that America is
a huge financial pyramid which will crash soon. Still, it is
hard to understand how this could happen in the first and
richest country of the world - without a war, without
missile or bomb strikes?
Koryagina: Besides bombs and missiles, there are
other kinds of weaponry, much more destructive ones...
Pravda: Well, economic theory. But how it is possible for
you to give an exact date [for the U.S. crash] - August 19?
Koryagina: The U.S. is engaged in a mortal economic game.
The known history of civilization is merely the visible part
of the iceberg.
There is a shadow economy, shadow politics
and also a shadow history, known to conspirologists. There
are [unseen] forces acting in the world, unstoppable for
[most powerful] countries and even continents.
Pravda: Just these forces intend to smash America on August
Koryagina: There are international "super-state" and
"super-government" groups. In accordance with tradition, the
mystical and religious components play extremely important
roles in human history.
One must take into account the
shadow economy, shadow politics and the religious component,
while predicting the development of the present financial
Pravda: Still, I don't understand what could be
done to this giant country [the U.S.], whose budget is
calculated in the trillions of dollars.
Koryagina: It is possible to do anything to the U.S...
whose total debt has reached $26 trillion. Generally, the
Western economy is at the boiling point now.
financial actives of $300 trillion are hanging over the
planet. At any moment, they could fall on any stock exchange
and cause panic and crash.
The recent crisis in Southeast
Asia, which touched Russia, was a rehearsal.
Pravda: What is the sense of smashing just America?
Koryagina: The U.S. has been chosen as the object of
financial attack because the financial center of the planet
is located there. The effect will be maximal.
waves of economic crisis will spread over the planet
instantly and will remind us of the blast of a huge nuclear
Pravda: Did Russia's crisis of 1998 have this
Koryagina: ...The Russian crisis of 1998 was preconditioned
by internal factors. Yeltsin's policy enlarged its
consequences. Now we have President Putin, and this is a
Pravda: What do we have to do now?
Koryagina: Recommendations, compiled by the Duma Commission
of Economic Politics after the recent Duma hearings, offer
instruction on what should be done to escape the
consequences of a world crisis inspired by a financial
catastrophe in the U.S.
This document will be sent
- or has
already been sent - to President Putin.
Pravda: What should Russian citizens do?
Koryagina: They should start changing their dollars for
rubles. President Putin and the Russian Central Bank are
already taking the necessary healthy measures.
high chances that after 19 August the ruble will become a
very good currency.
Pravda: Why 19 August, say, and not the 21st?
Koryagina: Some fluctuation in this date is possible.
Serious forces are acting against THOSE WHO ARE NOW
PREPARING THE ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES.
August, with very high probability, will bring the financial
catastrophe to the U.S... The last 10 days of August have
especial importance from a religious-sensible point of view.
[End of excerpt]
Dr. Alexandr Nemets
Sept. 17, 2001