by Jeffrey A. Tucker
October 13,
2023
from
BrownStone Website
Jeffrey A. Tucker 5is Founder and President of the
Brownstone Institute.
He
is also Senior Economics Columnist for Epoch Times,
author of 10 books, including Liberty or Lockdown, and
thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular
press.
He
speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social
philosophy, and culture. |
In the course of almost four years, and really dating back a decade
and a half, I've managed to read most of the writings of the
intellectuals, titans of industry, and government officials who
constructed,
the strange
reality of 2020 and after...!
They wanted to conduct a
science
experiment on the human
population...
Because infectious
disease knows no borders,
they knew for sure it
would have to be a global one.
They had every detail worked out in their models.
They knew how far
apart people would need to stand.
They knew that the
best way to stop any common virus from spreading would be total
isolation of the whole human population insofar as that was
possible...
Families could not do
that of course but they figured that they could live in different
rooms or simply stay six feet apart.
If they couldn't do that,
they could
mask up.
It goes without saying - but they said it anyway because their
models told them so - that indoor and outdoor venues where people
gathered had to be closed (those were the exact words
issued by
the White House on March 16, 2020).
The scheme was deployed,
-
first in China
-
then Northern
Italy
-
then the United
States,
...and the rest of the
world fell in line, all but a handful of nations including Sweden,
which faced many months of brutal criticism for allowing freedom for
its citizens.
It's truly hard to imagine what the architects of this barbaric
policy believed would happen next.
Is it as simple (and
ridiculous) as believing that a respiratory virus would just
disappear...?
Or that a potion
would show up in time to inoculate the whole population even
though no one has ever successfully come up with something like
that before...?
Is that what they
believed...?
Maybe... or maybe it was
just fun or otherwise remuneratively advantageous,
to try out a grand
and global experiment on the human population...
Certainly it was
profitable for many, even if it wrecked the social, cultural,
economic, and political lives of billions of people.
Even as I write those
words, it's hard to believe they are not out of some dystopian
fiction.
And yet this is
what happened...!
Almost immediately, the
idea of human rights took a back seat. Obviously so.
So did the idea of equal
freedom: that was immediately on the chopping block.
By edict, the human
population was divided into categories. It began with essential
and nonessential, distinctions drawn from military protocols
that suddenly pertained to the whole of the civilian world.
That was only the
beginning of the stark divisions.
The stigmatization of the
sick began immediately too.
Were they sick
because they were insufficiently compliant...?
Did they disobey the
protocols...?
In a hundred years of
public health, we've not seen this level and scale of demarcation.
Some of this was attempted during
the AIDS crisis (pushed by none
other than
Anthony Fauci) but not this
aggressively or comprehensively.
In those days, you could feel the concern for basic rights and
freedom slipping, and with it the moral conscience of the public
mind.
From the beginning, it
felt like martial law and the population was being divided:
-
sick vs. well
-
compliant vs.
noncompliant
-
essential vs.
non-essential
-
elective
surgeries vs. emergencies needing medical services
And so on...
And this expanded dramatically over the coming months. When face
coverings came along, it was masked vs unmasked.
When some states started
opening, it became,
-
red vs. blue
-
Us vs. them...
When the vaccine came
along, the ultimate division hit, piling upon and swamping all the
others:
vaccinated vs.
unvaccinated...
The mandates massively
disrupted the labor force.
The public accommodations
of whole cities were shut off to the unvaccinated, so that
noncompliant citizens could not go to restaurants, bars, libraries,
theaters, or other public places.
Even houses of worship
went along even though they didn't have to, breaking their
congregations into two parts.
Behind all of this was a political motive that traces to a text that
every high expert still celebrates as a prescient and decisive
refutation of liberal values:
Carl Schmitt's
Concept of the Political from
1932...
This essay is utterly
dismissive of human rights on grounds that such notions do not
sustain robust states.
He was of course a
Nazi jurist and his thought laid the groundwork for the
demonization of the Jews and the march of the totalitarian
state.
In Schmitt's mind, the friend/enemy distinction is the best method
of rallying the people around a grand cause that gives life meaning.
This impulse is what gives strength to the state.
He goes further:
the friend/enemy
distinction is best ignited in the reality of bloodshed:
"The state as the
decisive political entity possesses an enormous power:
the
possibility of waging war and thereby publicly disposing
of the lives of men.
The jus belli
contains such a disposition.
It implies a
double possibility:
the right to
demand from its own members the readiness to die and
unhesitatingly to kill enemies."
If for years, you have
asked the question,
"Where does this
end?"...
We now have our answer,
which seems inevitable in retrospect:
War...!
We are looking at the
deaths of innocents and probably this as just the beginning.
The lockdowns broke not only the
old moral codes and agreed-upon limits to state power.
It broke the human
personality and spirit the whole world over.
It gave rise to a
bloodlust that was barely beneath the surface.
States went crazy in
bullying and dividing their citizens.
It happened nearly
everywhere but Israel was a leading case in point, as Brownstone
has pointed out repeatedly. The
citizenry has never been more divided and the state never more
distracted from security concerns.
The delicate peace was
shattered in shocking ways on October 8, 2023 in a
ghastly attack that revealed the
worst security failure in the vulnerable state in its history.
That incident then encouraged and further unleashed the
apocalyptics, whole peoples determined to take the next step in
the dehumanization of the population and the use of appalling means
of doing the unthinkable:
extermination,
a word now thrown around as if it is fine and normal to speak
this way...
This conflict has now
reached further into the politics of every country and down to every
civic association, communities of intellectuals, and personal
friendship.
As Schmitt might have
loved - and what
Bret Weinstein calls
Goliath (the unity of
administrative state, media, corporate power, and elite tech
platforms) surely celebrates - everyone is being turned into the
category of 'friend and enemy'...
We are reminded at last of how incredibly fragile civilization - and
the peace and freedom that gives rise to it - truly is.
We should worry that
in the drama of the moment, the history recounted above will be
discarded from human memory.
The plans for
virus eradication failed so badly that many of its
perpetrators are desperate for a dramatic change of subject so
that they can avoid responsibility.
Again, this is the
desire, and it might even be the plan.
This simply cannot be allowed to happen.
Those of us with
memories of civilized life, including universal rights and
freedoms, cannot stay silent or get emotionally drawn in to the
point that we are willing to forget what was done to us, the
damage it inflicted on public culture, and the moral conduct a
civilized people expect.
Every war
is preceded by a period of,
From there it is a simple
matter of flipping the switch.
Brownstone was founded in light of the above history to shine
a light on higher ideals, not a Schmittian war between friends
and enemies but,
societies of
compassion, dignity, freedom, rights, and the exercise of human
volition against all threats and uses of violence public and
private.
This is our guiding light
now and always.
Apocalypticism
builds nothing:
It only destroys.
It's the
instantiation of the philosophy of The Joker.
No nation and no
community can survive it.
Few of us knew or fully
understood the depth of depravity just beneath the thin veneer of
civilization that had previously dominated the large expanse of our
lives.
It was the maniacal
experiment in disease control only a few years ago that
triggered this bout of man's inhumanity to man.
There is a burning need
to know how this came about and why,
and take
measures, now desperate ones, to put back into the
Pandora's box all that was released...!
|