Bill Gates
is WHO's No. 1 funder
In April 2020,
Donald Trump,
suspended U.S. funding to WHO
while the administration conducted a review into its,
"role in
severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus."
This clearly propelled the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation into the WHO's No.1 funder slot.
Upon election,
President
Joe Biden,
reversed the Trump
administration decision, restoring U.S. funding to WHO.
However,
Bill Gates is still the
No. 1 funder, contributing more
to WHO's $4.84 billion biennial budget than any member-state
government. Gates has used his money strategically to infect the
international aid agencies with his distorted self-serving
priorities.
The U.S. historically has been the largest direct
donor to WHO.
However, Bill Gates contributes to WHO via multiple avenues,
including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as GAVI,
which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with
WHO, the World Bank and various vaccine manufacturers.
As of 2018, the cumulative contributions from the Gates
Foundation and GAVI made Gates the unofficial top sponsor of the
WHO, even before the Trump administration's 2020 move to cut all
his support to the organization.
And in fact, Gates gives so
much that Politico wrote a
highly-critical article about
his undue financial influence over the WHO's operations in 2017,
which Politico said was causing the agency to spend:
"... a disproportionate amount of its resources on projects with
the measurable outcomes Gates prefers...
His sway has NGOs and
academics worried. Some health advocates fear that because the
Gates Foundation's money comes from investments in big business,
it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to
undermine WHO's role in setting standards and shaping health
policies."
Plus, Gates,
"also routes funding to WHO through SAGE [Strategic
Advisory Group of Experts] and UNICEF and Rotary International
bringing his total contributions to over $1 billion," Kennedy
explains in the book, adding that these tax-deductible donations
give Gates both leverage and control over international health
policy, "which he largely directs to serve the profit interest
of his pharma partners."
As noted in the featured film, when it was founded, WHO could
decide how to distribute its contributions.
Now, 70% of its
budget is tied to specific projects, countries or regions, which
are
dictated by the funders.
As
such, Gates' priorities are the backbone of WHO, and it wasn't a
coincidence when he said of WHO,
"Our priorities are your
priorities."
"Gates' vaccine obsession has diverted WHO's giving from poverty
alleviation, nutrition, and clean water to make vaccine uptake
its preeminent public health metric.
And Gates is not afraid to
throw his weight around," according to Kennedy's book.
"...The
sheer magnitude of his foundation's financial contributions has
made Bill Gates an unofficial - albeit unelected - leader of the
WHO."
Pharma &
WHO cashing checks in previous 'pandemic's
During the 2009 H1N1 (swine flu) 'pandemic', secret agreements
were made between,
-
Germany
-
Great Britain
-
Italy
-
France,
...with
the pharmaceutical industry before the H1N1 'pandemic' began,
which stated that they would purchase H1N1 flu vaccinations -
but only if a 'pandemic' level 6 was declared by WHO.
The "TrustWHO" documentary shows how, six weeks before the
'pandemic' was declared, no one at WHO was worried about the
virus, but the media was nonetheless exaggerating the dangers.
Then, in the month leading up to the 2009 H1N1
'pandemic', WHO
changed the official definition of 'pandemic', removing the
severity and high mortality criteria and leaving the
definition of a 'pandemic' as,
"a
worldwide epidemic of a disease."
This switch in definition allowed WHO to declare swine flu a
'pandemic' after only 144 people had died from the infection
worldwide.
In 2010, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, then head of health at
the Council of Europe,
accused pharmaceutical companies
of influencing WHO's 'pandemic' declaration, calling swine flu a
"false 'pandemic'" that was driven by Big Pharma, which cashed in
on the health scare.
According to
Wodarg, the swine flu
'pandemic'
was,
"one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."
In
the investigation into WHO and Big Pharma's falsification of a
'pandemic', an
inquiry stated:
"... in order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against
flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official
agencies responsible for public health standards to alarm
governments worldwide and make them squander tight health
resources for inefficient vaccines strategies, and needlessly
expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown
amount of side effects of insufficiently tested vaccines."
While governments ended up with stockpiles of vaccines they
would never use, many of those who received the H1N1 swine flu
vaccine
suffered from adverse effects
including Guillain-Barre syndrome, narcolepsy, cataplexy and
other forms of brain damage.
The
origins cover-up
WHO's investigation into
Covid-19's origin was also a "fake"
investigation from the start.
China was allowed to hand pick the
members of the WHO's investigative team, which included
Peter Daszak, Ph.D., who has close professional ties to the
Wuhan
Institute of Virology.
The inclusion of Dazsak on this team virtually guaranteed the
dismissal of the lab-origin theory, and in February 2021, WHO
cleared the institute and two
other biosafety level 4 laboratories in Wuhan, China, of
wrongdoing, saying these labs had nothing to do with the
COVID-19 outbreak.
Only after backlash, including an
open letter signed by 26
scientists demanding a full and unrestricted forensic
investigation into the pandemic's origins, did WHO enter damage
control mode, with Director General
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
and 13 other world leaders joining the U.S. government in
expressing,
"frustration with
the level of access China granted an international mission to
Wuhan."
A couple of noteworthy points - Gates handpicked Ghebreyesus as
WHO's director general, not because of his qualifications -
Tedros has no medical degree and a background that includes
accusations of human rights violations - but due to his loyalty
to Gates, again according to Kennedy's book.
Further, WHO's allegiance to China was secured years earlier,
when China secured WHO votes to ensure its candidates would
become director-general.
A Sunday Times investigation also
revealed that WHO's independence was severely compromised and
its close ties to China allowed COVID-19 to spread in the early
days of the 'pandemic' while obfuscating the investigation into
its origins.
According to
the Sunday Times:
"The WHO leadership prioritized China's economic interests over
halting the spread of the virus when Covid-19 first emerged.
China exerted ultimate control over the WHO investigation into
the origins of Covid-19, appointing its chosen experts and
negotiating a backroom deal to water down the mandate."
WHO's
China ties played 'decisive role' in 'pandemic'
On Jan. 28, 2020, four weeks after Taiwan had alerted WHO that a
mysterious respiratory illness was spreading in China, WHO had
not yet taken action and continued to praise China.
Tedros even praised China for their transparency and said the
Chinese president had,
"shown 'rare leadership' and deserved
'gratitude and respect' for acting to contain the outbreak at
the epicenter," the
Sunday Times reported.
"These
'extraordinary steps' had prevented further spread of the virus,
and this was why, he said, there were only 'a few cases of
human-to-human transmission outside China, which we are
monitoring very closely'."
Speaking with the Sunday Times, professor
Richard Ebright of
Rutgers University's Waksman Institute of Microbiology in New
Jersey,
said it was this close
connection that ultimately steered the course of the 'pandemic':
"Not only did it have a role; it has had a decisive role. It was
the only motivation.
There was no scientific or medical or
policy justification for the stance that the WHO took in January
and February 2020. That was entirely premised on maintaining
satisfactory ties to the Chinese government.
"So at every step of the way, the WHO promoted the position that
was sought by the Chinese government... the WHO actively resisted
and obstructed efforts by other nations to implement effective
border controls that could have limited the spread or even
contained the spread of the outbreak.
"It is impossible for me to believe that the officials in
Geneva, who were making those statements, believed those
statements accorded with the facts that were available to them
at the time the statements were made.
It's hard not to see that
the direct origin of that is the support of the Chinese
government for Tedros's election as director-general …
"This was a remarkably high return on [China's] investment with
the relatively small sums that were invested in supporting his
election. It paid off on a grand scale for the Chinese
government."
WHO
corruption runs deep
Even prior to the 'pandemic', WHO had released
a statement that it had been in
discussions with Facebook to,
"ensure people can access
authoritative information on vaccines and reduce the spread of
inaccuracies."
At WHO's first Global
Vaccination Summit, held in Brussels in September 2019, Jason
Hirsch, Facebook's public policy manager, alluded to the
censorship and media manipulation that was to come:
"The first thing that we are doing is reducing the distribution
of misinformation about vaccinations and the second thing that
we are doing is increasing exposure to credible, authoritative
content on vaccinations."
Rather than putting public health first, such as pushing for
safety studies into vaccination, WHO's history clearly
illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and other industries.
WHO, for instance,
has
downplayed the health effects
caused by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, stating that only
50 deaths were directly caused by the incident and,
"a total of
up to 4,000 people could eventually die of radiation exposure"
from the disaster.
WHO signed an agreement with the International Atomic Energy
Agency, which is "promoting peaceful use of atomic energy," in
1959, making it subordinate to the agency in relation to
ionizing radiation.
WHO's response to the Fukushima radiation disaster in 2011 was
also
criticized, with evidence of a
high-level cover-up.
WHO once again downplayed the risks,
stating,
"the predicted risks
are low and no observable increases in cancer rates above
baseline rates are anticipated."
WHO also received more than $1.6 million from
opioid giant Purdue from 1999
to 2010 and used industry-supported opioid data to incorporate
into its official pro-opioid guidelines.
According to the Alliance of
Human Research Protection, WHO's collaboration with Purdue led
to expanded opioid use and global addiction.
Due to its acceptance of private money, a review in the Journal
of Integrative Medicine & Therapy went so far as to say the
corruption of WHO is the,
"biggest threat to the world's public
health of our time",
...particularly as it relates to WHO's drug
recommendations - including its "list
of essential medicines" - which it believes is biased
and not reliable.
Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily
conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a
guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.
