|
by Saeed A. Qureshi,
Ph.D. from Principia-Scientific Website
Most of the time, people make money by providing products and services which benefit the public.
For example,
By the way, if Microsoft had not existed, it is unlikely that Amazon would have existed.
Working so long with Microsoft, it is understandable that he might have felt that field might have been saturated, and further progress to his liking might not happen.
So, he needed a different area and idea to explore.
On the face of it, it is
a fantastic idea for someone with extensive computing knowledge and
a deep pocket.
Multiple repeats and various combinations and permutations of these four letters are considered the basis of life and varieties of life's variations and diseases.
So, understandably, if
one could master these combinations and permutations (commonly known
as sequences or sequencing) of these quaternary sets of letters, one
would decipher the life and effectively address the deviation (such
as sickness/illness).
So, for Mr. Gates, having vast sums of money and computing expertise would appear a perfect opportunity for a new business adventure on a grand scale.
With the idea in mind,
one could speculate that Mr. Gates might have entered into the world
of vaccine development, in
particular gene-based such as the mRNA type, i.e., mRNA (the
four-letter sequence) interacting with (another quaternary letter
sequences) - the viruses...
So, he would join forces with medical experts, who are considered knowledgeable in quaternary lettering sets and health providers at national (CDC - FDA) and international levels (WHO).
The ground has been set
for remarkable "scientific" and "health" endeavors by designing
genes and then modifying genes using effective computer models; who
could be better in it than Mr. Gates himself.
It is like electricity or
electrons that have been taken care of. However, the movement and
storage of electrons were to be done by computing (the success story
of Microsoft).
On the other hand, he would rely on the resources and knowledge of genetic quaternary letterings through experts commonly referred to as medical experts and scientists who have been working in the area for many decades and have made all kinds of claims of success in the area.
This virus (sequence) requires a shorter version of the quaternary letters to fix the "bad guy" (virus) with missile precision and accuracy.
As this is all based on letters and their sequences matching, the technique is supposed to work with mathematical and computer precision and presumably no or little chance of failure.
At the same time, the standard animal and human efficacy and safety studies were considered irrelevant and useless as sequencing-based science was presumed to be precise considering its mathematical foundation.
Therefore, proper and
standard safety and efficacy studies may be regarded as
old-fashioned, unnecessary, and thus generally disregarded.
The quaternary lettering does not represent the virus or any disease-causing agents:
This false and fictional
concept is made up and promoted by medical experts, supported by
virologists, microbiologists, molecular biologists, and others.
Physicians, virologists, immunologists, microbiologists, and molecular biologists made another fundamental incorrect assumption.
They called the step of
culturing the swab content with a medium (having numerous known and
unknown ingredients) the isolation of the virus.
Scientifically if the claim is that the virus exists, it must be shown first to exist physically, with a specimen in a test tube or vial.
Then, one needs to extract and isolate the RNA from this isolated pure virus specimen and establish its composition and structure.
On the other hand, based on lab experimentation (culturing), claims have been made that,
This is how the science
of virology is described in the medical literature for viruses, PCR
test, and (mRNA)
vaccines - pure and simple imaginary...!
With some initiators (called primers) and doing a simple repeat (cycles) of a chemical reaction (PCR) comes some sequence that is claimed to represent the disease-causing virus.
In short,
This is how the virus's concept is described in the literature (books and journals) of microbiology, immunology, virology, molecular biology, medicine, etc.
The long, unreadable (gibberish), and non-understandable sequences of the quaternary letter sets become the virus or its representation authenticated (certified) by peers.
Anyone who would read
such books and listens to such experts will believe in the
"science."
However, the sequenced-based virus story is presented as if actual science was followed, i.e., the virus was isolated, and its RNA sequence was established.
This is the fraud
part because no one can consider culturing as isolating or
purifying substances. This is not an oversight but a deliberate
attempt to deceive the public or other knowledgeable people.
At present, one cannot even be sure that the coronavirus has RNA or DNA because no one has isolated and studied the virus:
However, the computer or sequenced-based science, which for all practical purposes is fake and fraudulent, has effectively promoted as a future treatment or cure for every ailment. That is, vaccines made to order for every treatment from infections to cancer... scientifically, pure and simple nonsense.
In reality, and
scientifically speaking, when there is no virus, it is impossible to
develop a test for it (link),
and there cannot be a treatment for a non-existing virus or disease
(link).
The (PCR) test positives/negatives (an indicator of virus) remained similar with or without vaccination. So, rather than considering the vaccine's ineffectiveness, claims were made that efficacy got reduced or the virus mutated to different variants.
Why did effectiveness get reduced?
On the other hand,
efficacy claims were moved from protection from the virus to
protecting from serious illness and death of the patients without
any experimental data.
Literature started showing the ineffectiveness of the treatment or approach, for example,
Even Mr. Gates indicated,
Wow, there appears to be a crack in the "science"...
The amazing part is that even with the clear evidence of a lack of effectiveness, with substantial severe side effects, including deaths, the vaccination and testing promotion continues with the full force of coercion.
Why is so?
However, in reality, it is not a science profession (link) - this is where lies start.
These professionals are
never trained in science and never practice science. All their
claims related to science are simply baseless and non-scientific.
They establish their scientific claim by "ordering science" from other professions for generating (virtual) viruses, developing tests for them and faking their isolation, computer modeling their structures and designs, etc.
It is hard to believe that everything mentioned about viruses during the past three to four decades has been based on this fake science...
For example, a PCR test is not a test for the virus or its RNA because a chemical test (which a PCR test is supposed to be) requires a reference, which in this case is the virus or RNA.
Therefore, claiming that a test is available for the virus or RNA is a false scientific claim (link).
Everything else is based on testing, i.e., monitoring pandemics and developing vaccines, which have to become null and void.
But unfortunately, the situation can't be reversed or corrected.
The medical profession has lost its pride, respect, and relevance.
It needs to regain it by competing with other alternate medicine practitioners judged by the public or patients and not by,
...exactly like any other
business.
|
