For short video, CLICK below image
FULL interview go
Are you God?
'Controversies' is a better word.
Because most of what Gates has been getting up to of late has been about defending himself about projects and relationships that he'd prefer not to be in the public domain.
his relationship with
Jeffrey Epstein, and, of course,
there's his bizarre fixation with vaccinating and funding the World
But then there's his fondness for popularizing the likelihood of pandemics. No other figure bangs on so much about vaccines and the need for humanity to protect itself from pandemics like Bill Gates.
Because he can. He has the money to buy attention. But the inevitable conclusion seems to be that he has some type of weird God Delusion... that he is completely, stark-raving, insane.
Oh and likes making a return on his self-fulfilling prophecies.
Gate's answer isn't especially definitive.
In 2018 it was all-in to mRNA as a salvation - the 'technology' that would inject hope into billions of arms in the fight against Covid-19.
Some of that
was purportedly sold last year at a significant price premium.
Another of Gates' chosen up-and-coming companies was Moderna.
not been for
Covid-19 it was looking like it may end up more like
But that didn't seem to stop people investing in it.
The key difference with Moderna was that it developed a relationship
with Gates who is, quite simply, the ultimate king-maker given his
near total control of the new philanthropy that is vaccine peddling.
Nope. You'll just have to understand a little bit about
how financial markets work, the process of IPOs, and why investors
like sure things.
Firstly, it's an American English acronym that means Initial Public Offer. In the United Kingdom we used to use the term "going public" or "floating". It's what happens when a company offers to trade its stock on a public exchange.
The initial public offer details what the company has been up to prior to the IPO. It also lists all the officers, their backgrounds, details of the products and services, and lots of financial information.
The process of going public is typically guided by an army of specialists - law firms acting on behalf of the company, tax advisors, accountants - all of whom earn vast amounts of fee income on the back of the IPO.
But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversees the process and insists that as much information as possible is made available to potential investors.
I'm going to return to IPOs - and specifically the Moderna IPO - a little later in this piece.
But at this stage I want you, dear reader, to hold this thought. The IPO represents a liquidity event. When company stock is listed on a public exchange the shares in that company can be bought and sold.
It may be that the stock is relatively illiquid if held by institutions unwilling to sell.
But this, too, has a market effect. It can drive the quoted price up. And this effect is why hedge funds often get involved in buying significant holdings in recently quoted firms.
They can dip in and out of the market - selling when the stock price is high and buying back when it's cheap.
And they tend to work very closely with the main underwriters of IPOs - typically the major investment banks like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs - to fully understand the IPO opportunity.
The investment roadshow is an opportunity for the investment banks to brief institutional investors on the opportunity. Some 11 investment banks were involved in Moderna's IPO.
They all wanted a share of the action, despite the obvious risks articulated in the Moderna S1:
Now, I've hinted in the subtitle of this piece that it's about the Covid-19 "pandemic".
If you're subscribing to this site, or even a visitor, you'll probably know - based on the dozens of previous articles I've written, or my Twitter feed - that I've always been in the libertarian camp.
Like many others - and many of the campaign groups I've supported - I've always voiced my opinion that lockdown was the greatest act of self-harm that nation-states could ever have imposed on themselves.
But the reason I've written this article is because I'm pretty sure I know now why they were imposed. I'm also pretty sure I know why so many nations coerced their people to take mRNA shots that were known not to be efficacious - and, potentially, even damaging.
And, clearly, I'm suggesting that financialization is at the heart of the theory.
One was the bizarre non-interview of Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, as he tried to find his way to the entrance of the World Economic Forum conference centre in Davos.
Bourla was intercepted by Avi Yemini of Rebel News, and a few of his colleagues.
Bourla said precisely nothing as he was asked a barrage of questions. And the video featuring Bourla's non-responsive interrogation was viewed, last time I looked, over 20 million times.
To put that in context, the BBC news bulletins in the UK reach
around 10-15 million in a week.
He couldn't engage or defend himself because he would have almost certainly have made a fool of himself or caused his PR help to have a word.
But the unanswered questions were left hanging in the air.
Now, according to George Webb, the self-styled "investigative journalist," the folks over at Project Veritas were a tad spooked by the fact that the Rebel News people got the Bourla scoop (even though he didn't actually say anything).
The proof was in the number of video eyeballs. Therefore, enter Jordan Walker, the subject of the Project Veritas sting operation.
Walker, who was secretly video
recorded over a dinner date, was apparently a senior scientist at
Pfizer who proceeded to spill the beans on Pfizer's use of "Directed
Evolution" - experimentation on monkeys to hone new mRNA vaccine
formulas effective on new Covid-19 variants.
Project Veritas pushed the hell out of the video sequences, George Webb spun it all into a new theory about the Boston Consulting Group (all terribly confusing), and everyone went hunting for proof that Walker was, in fact, a pizza thrower, a double-agent, a dodgy consultant, an actor, or all of the above.
Meanwhile Pfizer put out
some dodgy statements that said nothing much.
Indeed one is often left with the impression that the alternative media are creating a new, contorted narrative that obfuscates rather than focuses on the heart of the issue - market manipulation and greed and the egos of god-delusionists.
The video illustrated just one thing:
Many people are reliant on the governments of the world, and organizations funded by 'philanthropists', to know what Covid-19 is, and where it came from. An eager media tells us how to think, how to believe, and what conclusions we should reach about Bill Gates and pandemics.
But, the fact remains, many more died of the disease (as defined by health authorities) after the vaccination program than before - according to their data. Perhaps the statisticians messed up. Perhaps not...
And, meanwhile, excess deaths are going up just as Bill Gates exits
the mRNA market.
On leaving the hotel, luggage by our side, we looked up at the towers, reaching to infinity it seemed. Lots of taxi drivers and limo service touts encircled us. All were offering spectacular deals on rides to the airport.
We were saved by the hotel concierge who escorted us to a yellow cab.
No more so than in Wall Street, it seems.
Over the last few decades "entrepreneurs" have dreamt up some incredible get rich quick schemes. Everything has become financialised. Businesses and industries have been transformed to feed the entrepreneurs of Wall Street.
Slow moving industries have been forced to be fast.
They knew how to work the networking opportunities at Davos rather than a tropical diseases summit in Lesotho.
Case in point:
Moderna's IPO was in late 2018.
The company unashamedly built itself
on mRNA (messenger RNA "technology"). In effect, Moderna modeled
itself more on a Silicon Valley technology start-up than a typical
drugs company. mRNA, it claimed, was essentially software.
However, this summary hid systemic problems in the company.
Whitney Webb's analysis of Moderna's business model and IPO, published in 2021, detailed the mess that was unfolding in the company even after the IPO:
Whitney's paper detailed just how these problems dogged the company even as it worked to develop a Covid-19 "vaccine".
In particular, there were fundamental issues with the method for delivering the mRNA to the patients' bodies using a system called V1GL - a nanoparticle delivery system.
This technology was not even developed by Moderna. It was licensed from a company called Acuitas. But even this licensing arrangement was complicated.
Candidate drugs were seen to be too toxic to be delivered to subjects - and the delivery system seemed to be the major issue. Indeed the toxicity was such that the company started looking for use-cases where only one dose might be required - hence vaccines.
And either by coincidence, or design,
both Anthony Fauci of the NIAID and Rick Bright of BARDA, became
champions for Moderna and its claimed ability to develop vaccines
more rapidly than was considered previously possible.
The partnership between Moderna and the NIH to co-develop what would soon become Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine was being forged as early as January 7, 2020, long before the official declaration of the COVID-19 crisis as a pandemic and before a vaccine was proclaimed as necessary by officials and other individuals.
Not only did the COVID-19 vaccine quickly become the
answer to nearly all Moderna's woes but it also provided the
disruptive scenario necessary to alter the public's perceptions of
what a vaccine is and eliminate existing safeguards and bureaucracy
in vaccine approval.
And, in the process, a relatively modest number of people made a spectacularly large amount of money in stock in a company that had just IPO'ed a few months before.
And in the process of the
IPO the management of Moderna benefited greatly from a technology
and some fundamental tenets of virology that collectively could only
be described as pseudoscience.
Indeed there's a widespread acceptance - even among those who question the efficacy of the vaccine - that genomics and biochemistry can come together to prove, beyond doubt, that a miniscule airborne particle can literally sweep across the world and fundamentally reprogram our bodies for the worse.
even extend this argument to suggest that we can manufacture
antidotes to this little devastating particle, by using shambolic
technology that's never been proven or manufactured at scale. It
literally beggars belief.
There was no need for Moderna's products - or Pfizer's (based on similar conjectures and duff science). The drugs have no efficacy because the viruses they purport to protect people against have never been proven to exist (throat swabs and electron microscopes still don't show causality).
And it's almost certainly the case that the manufacture of such products at such scale will also expose people receiving such products to risks that are simply unnecessary.
Inevitably it means that Covid-19 is a narrative, a myth. It also means that the testing regimes for Covid-19 were also myths. It means that all the regulations, lockdowns, hand sanitizers, masks, everything... they too were part of the global lie that there was such a thing as a deadly disease that had never existed before and could spread like wildfire.
And that this happened just weeks
after the very idea of such a "pandemic" had already been gamed by
the global public health vaccine myth-makers.
Covid-19 deaths among the groups that are most likely to suffer the most severe consequences from respiratory disease - the elderly - were clearly the result of negligent healthcare. Invasive ventilation - recommended by the Chinese - resulted in deaths that could have been avoided.
The use of proven therapies - including antibiotics to treat infections associated with respiratory illness, like pneumonia - were considered inappropriate.
Elderly people died
alone in care homes, denied treatment regimens that were proven to
be effective prior to Covid-19.
Patients were denied access to general practitioners. Surgical procedures were cancelled. Diagnoses were missed. And the kill rate increased markedly.
The entire focus of the government and the media was
focused on a myth. And the myth was made worse by a mythical test
for a mythical thing. And lots of signs and masks and stuff made in
Viruses are likely ancient, and our deep evolutionary history is surely a tale of intricate co-evolution.
It is hard to imagine how any significant ecological niche would not have been colonised by them many times.
We discern only the narrowest slice of viral reality as we probe sequences.
Yet seldom is any viral taxonomy or phylogeny accompanied
by appropriate expressions of doubt or uncertainty. The pace with
which conjecture is taken as axiomatic is breathtaking.
A story must always be told of accompanying poverty, poison, life choices, self-abuse, diet or cognition.
This is so much the case with SARS-CoV-2 as to
render pointless any attempt to set a point estimate for its
fatality rate, other than to observe that it is very low - negligible
But the null hypothesis, in my view, is much more compelling: there was no novel virus.
There was, simply, incompetence, money-making, greed and terrible inhumanity inflicted on people who were most in need of care and the love of their families.
For this to have happened required the work of psychopaths.
CEOs of large corporations tend not to be challenged. Their views are held in high esteem by others who may ultimately succeed them and who emulate them.
I have met people I know to have revolting personality disorders but who can spew diversity or climate emergency mantras extremely effectively because they know that by doing so they perhaps might signal virtues that they know they don't have.
Unchallenged egos need to be fed, constantly, with projects, wealth
and power. They seek each other out - and no annual convention feeds
the souls of the soulless more than the World Economic Forum.
It, and the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group and World Health Organization (WHO) and GAVI (Bill Gates' vaccine 'charity') see themselves as moral custodians in projects that result in shareholder value to their corporate "partners".
The internecine relationship between the power players allow them to model and game rather than produce anything of value.
And so it stands to reason
that liquidity events that value the funders, "partners", global
leaders, hedge funds and NGOs will be hot-housed, nurtured and
promoted by embedded media organizations.
Something wicked came in 2020...
It wasn't a pandemic...