by Jeffrey A. Tucker
The first level has presented a chaotic narrative of the previously unthinkable.
A killer virus that turned out to be what many people said it was in February 2020:
But that template and the ensuing campaign of
fear and emergency rule gave rise to astonishing changes in our
lives.
The cure for the disease itself caused tremendous
damage to health including death, a subject about which everyone
cared intensely before the shot and then strangely forgot about
after.
However, and simultaneously, other forms of protest were encouraged, insofar as they were motivated by a more proper political agenda against structural injustices in the old system of law and order.
That was a strange confluence of events, to say
the least...
The old Declarations of rules on the Internet put free speech as a first principle.
Today, the hosting website of the most famous one, signed by Amnesty International and the ACLU, is gone, almost as if it never existed.
In 2022, it came to be replaced by a White House Declaration on the Future of the Internet, that extols stakeholder control as the central principle.
All the while, once-trusted sources of information - media, academia, think tanks - have steadfastly refused to report and respond in truthful ways, leading to a further loss of public trust not just in government and politics but also in everything else, including corporate tech and all the higher order sectors of the culture.
Also part of this has been a political crisis in many nations, including the use of sketchy election strategies justified by epidemiologic emergency:
Here we find one of many overlapping parallels to a scenario hardly ever imagined:
Crucially and ominously, all of these mind-blowing developments took place in roughly similar ways the world over, and with the same language and model.
Everywhere people were told "We are all in this together," and that social distancing, masking, and vaxxing was the correct way out.
Media was also censored everywhere, while anti-lockdown protestors (or even those who simply wanted to worship together in peace) were treated not as dissidents to be tolerated but "irresponsible spreaders of disease"...
Can we really pretend that all of this is normal, much less justified?
Really...?
We all have a different starting place and journey but each of us has the following in common.
We've realized that official sources, the ones we've trusted in the past, are not going to make any sense of the above for us. We have to seek out alternatives and put the story together ourselves.
And this we must do because the only other choice is to accept that all of the above consists of a random series of disconnected and pointless events, which is surely not true.
That leads to the second layer of comprehension:
Here is where we find the real drama and incalculable difficulties.
At the dawn of lockdowns, what appeared to be a primitive public health error seemed to be taking place.
Surely such preposterous advice would be revealed soon as the nonsense it was.
As time went on, more and more anomalies appeared that made that judgment seem naive.
As it turns out, what was actually taking place had something to do with a move on the part of security and intelligence services.
There were early initial reports that the virus itself might have been leaked from a US-backed lab in Wuhan, which introduces the entire subject of the US bioweapons program.
This is a very deep rabbit hole itself, thoroughly exposed in Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s The Wuhan Cover-Up.
There was a reason that topic was censored:
And as it turns out, the vaccine itself was able to bypass the normal approval process by slipping through under the cover of emergency.
As the evidence continues to roll in, more and more rabbit holes appear, thousands of them.
Each has a name:
...and many more besides.
Each of these subject areas has threads or thousands of them, each connecting to more and to each other. At this point, it is simply not possible for a single person to follow it all.
To those of us who have been steeped in following the revelations day by day, and trying to keep up with putting them together into a coherent model of what happened to us, and what is still going on, the ominous reality is that,
Nothing operates today as it did in 2019.
It's not just that functioning broke. It was broken and then replaced. And the surreptitious coup d'état with no shots fired is still ongoing, even if that is not the headline.
Of this fact, many of us today are certain.
There are no reliable polls. We are left to guess.
If any of us in 2019 believed we had our finger on the pulse of the national mood or public opinion generally, we certainly do not anymore.
Nor do we have access to the inner workings of government at the highest levels, much less the conversations going on among the winners of our age, the well-connected ruling elites who seemed to have gamed the entire system for their own benefit.
It's so much easier to regard the whole thing as a giant confusion or accident on grounds that only cranks and crazies believe in conspiracy theories.
The trouble with that outlook is that it posits something even more implausible; that something this gigantic, far-reaching, and dramatic could have happened with no real intentionality or purpose or that it all fell together as a huge accident.
Brownstone Institute has published more than 2,000 articles and 10 books exploring all over the above topics. Other venues and friends are out there helping us with this research and discovery, issue by issue.
Even so, a great deal of responsibility falls on this one institution, the main work of which is providing support for dissident and displaced voices, which is implausible since it was only founded three years ago.
As for the intellectuals we once revered for their curiosity and wisdom, most seem to have gone into hiding, either unable to adapt to the new realities or just unwilling to risk their careers by exploring hard topics.
It's understandable but still tragic...
Most are happy to pretend like nothing happened or celebrate the change as nothing but progress... As for journalists, the New York Times publishes daily commentaries dismissing the Constitution as a dated anachronism that has to go and no one thinks much about it.
There is a lot to sort out. So much has changed so quickly. No sooner than the dust seems to be settling from one upheaval, there is another and then another.
Keeping up with it all causes a level of psychological brain scramble on a scale we've never previously experienced.
It's easier to wait for the historians to tell the next generation what happened.
But maybe, just maybe, by stepping up and telling the story as we see it in real time, we can make a difference in stopping this madness and restoring some sane and normal freedom back to the world...!
|