by Brandon Smith
their "Great Reset" scheme. Brandon Smith of alt-market.com speculates that, while Trump's tariffs disrupt globalism, could they also accelerate the very crisis globalists need to impose their vision...?
The news feeds are buzzing this week over the recent meeting between Russia, China and India at the Chinese port city of Tianjin.
Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi made sure to present a unified front at the event in economic terms.
Furthermore,
The Shanghai Cooperation Gathering is being treated as a warning to the U.S. in the face of trade tensions.
News flash for those who are unaware:
It's nothing new...
But they have a limited ability to carry out their goals without outside help.
What's behind the BRICS alliance?
I've been tracking the formation of the BRICS alliance since 2009 and the driving motive behind the economic bloc has always been to break from the dollar as the world reserve currency.
Exactly as BRICS analyst Dr. Pablo Ibaņez explained to Phillip Patrick in July:
BRICS analyst and geopolitics expert Professor Pablo Ibaņez explains the primary goal of the Brics2025 summit...
Video also HERE...
BRICS leaders have been calling for the end of the dollar and the introduction of a new global currency system for years.
Their plan is not as focused on the global East as many people assume. That is to say, if you're hoping the BRICS are going to "end globalism," you are sorely mistaken.
In fact, in 2009 both Russia and China put forward the notion of a global currency managed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Now, many people think the U.S. controls the IMF.
Globalists are only loyal to their own agenda.
The globalist role in dedollarization
Some people might argue that the situation has changed dramatically since 2009, but I disagree.
China is now inexorably tied to the IMF's SDR synthetic currency. Russia remains an active member of the IMF despite the war in Ukraine.
It's important to understand that there are always two different timelines when it comes to world events. There is the more publicized international theater of mainstream media and press conferences on the one hand.
And then there are the back-office operations of globalist institutions that happen in the shadows.
In my view, globalists are not necessarily behind every conflict or crisis. But they do position themselves to take advantage whenever possible. Globalists also play both sides of every conflagration in order to gain the most benefit.
In other words, groups like the IMF, World Bank, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the World Economic Forum (WEF) and trillion-dollar asset-management megacorporations like Blackrock and Vanguard have no loyalties.
It's no secret what this "New World Order" is intended to look like.
The Davos crowd has openly discussed their visions for years and during the pandemic they ripped the mask off and reveled in the inevitable implementation of their Great Reset agenda...
To summarize, this is what the elites want for the future economy:
These carbon taxes are then redistributed to incentivize cooperation at a nation-by-nation level.
Ultimately, the globalists want to introduce a Universal Basic Income (UBI) to make every individual dependent on centralized government for their needs. Essentially, to bribe people just enough they never think of rebelling.
This is what the Davos elite mean when they talk about the Great Reset. A complete and total destruction of financial privacy and economic freedom.
The Great Reset vs. the Trump Reset
I have noted in recent articles, however, that the globalists have grown disturbingly quiet in the past year.
I've seen the media and a number of central bankers and political leaders refer to this issue as Donald Trump's "economic reset" and I find this narrative fascinating.
Trump's reset, if we're to call it that, seems to be rooted in the reversal of the post-WWII Bretton-Woods agreement in which the U.S. was made the de facto financial engine of the global economy.
This was when the dollar's status as global reserve currency was solidified.
The formation of NATO meant America became both the consumption hub for the West and the global police force.
When it comes to Trump's reset, many presidents have used targeted tariffs since WWII, but none have enforced sweeping tariffs like Trump.
Often compared to the Smoot-Hawley tariffs under Herbert Hoover which are sometimes (incorrectly) blamed for the Great Depression, Trump's tariffs throw a monkey wrench into the gears of global trade.
As I've noted many times, global corporations are not the result of a free market.
If a company is "too big to fail" and is thus entitled to taxpayer cash through bailouts and money-printing, then by definition they are not the result of a free market.
Why should we care if they get taxed through tariffs?
Frankly, I think corporate globalism and economic interdependency should be abolished, by force if necessary.
Trump's tariffs along with his cuts to foreign subsidies and other economic policies could, in a few years, completely disrupt globalism as we know it.
But here's the rub:
As noted earlier, the formation of close ties between the BRICS nations has been ongoing since 2009 and their key goal has been to end the structures put in place by the Bretton-Woods agreement.
Whether the BRICS know it or not, their efforts to develop CBDCs and unseat the U.S., play directly into the globalist game plan.
The IMF and the BIS have been working diligently (and quietly) to build a cross-border CBDC framework and the IMF has been planning its own global digital currency built around the SDR basket.
The BIS sometimes refers to this system as a "Unified Ledger."
Trump's Tariffs and the End of Globalism
I support Trump's tariffs for a number of reasons.
I also realize that nothing is going to change unless drastic measures are taken in the near term.
And I also understand the reality of our current situation.
Think about it:
***
One way or another, the existing economic interdependency must end.
But if we're going to take this path, then we must also dismantle all globalist organizations in the process.
Here's how I expect the globalists to fight back...
They cannot be allowed to use our necessary reforms as as springboard to achieve the evils of their Great Reset.
Any real reset will require us to make the destruction of globalist institutions a priority...
|