Eliminating the Troublemaker Gene
Not all alien mega-populations are alike. Some, like Verdants, may
be more coldly
controlling than others.
Verdants and IFSP aliens say they offer
greater networks and benefits, more scientific and genetic aid than
is available to small alignments and independents. Meanwhile,
independent populations argue that independents who do their own
research are more rigorously responsible for their science. Their
awareness is simply configured differently. In some cases,
independents reportedly trade with other planets in order to meet
Eventually, of course, they participate in larger
Presumably like other mega-populations, Verdants genetically
engineer IFSP populations to have larger brains, better disease and
radiation resistance, and so on. Some IFSP gray aliens have even
been fitted with electronic implants in their brains, apparently for
security and communications purposes.
However, using more advanced
technology, Verdants can psychotronically monitor and influence
implanted grays if they want to, which raises an important question:
Are some genetic and other alterations designed to make a given
people easier to manage and control?
The question is especially relevant here, on Earth.
The IFSP is now
so deeply immersed in an abduction and breeding program here that
human abductees have been told they can be used for reproductive
purposes because they “belong to” the abductors. (Jacobs,
Secret Life, p. 128)
considers himself the IFSP’s leading "Councillor of Earth,” wrote me saying that the same aliens
did genetic improvements of humankind in
the past, hence they have a right to intervene here because we
belong to them.
Abductee “Emily” told David Jacobs about how gray
aliens see humans in terms of how we can be used. When a hybrid bred
by grays to look human argued with a gray about how he wanted a
fifteen year-old human abductee to be his sexual assignee, the gray
told him that the girl was “a resource, not a resort.” (The Threat,
In a similar vein,
Whitley Strieber once noted that his abductors’
main fear was human independence. Other abductees cite the
abductors’ plan to control Earth after an escalated crisis of some
Abductee Reshma Kamal told David Jacobs that a late-stage
hybrid (who looks nearly human) explained about his aliens:
he’s saying all they’re interested in, that no matter what happens
at all, is that they control.”
But why would a mega-population want to control other
Control allows them to quickly replace old ideas and conventions
with the mega-population’s preferences. Such people are easier to
assimilate and their planet’s resources easier to make use of,
afterwards. From the Verdant perspective, populations dispute less
among themselves when a more advanced authority is in control. But
how much control are we talking about?
Reshma Kamal was told that
after the aliens get their way here, on Earth, the abductors will
have total control and national governments won’t be necessary
because there will be “one system" with "one goal.”
Of course, the more drastic a target population’s predicament (i.e.
post-apocalyptic grays), the more quickly they can be altered and
assimilated, which suggests that some regime-minded mega-populations
may actually prefer to provoke escalated disasters on a target
planet in order to obliterate its previous identity. (In a different
vein, Naomi Klein’s book Shock Doctrine points to the same strategy
here by economics graduates of the University of Chicago, which was
founded by a Rockefeller.)
It’s a risky strategy because target
populations can be sharply critical of alien colonizers. They may be
reluctant to give up their independence, regardless of the
Sometimes, a target people’s own colonial history will have been
repressive. So, why would they trust an alien colonizer? Perhaps
they don’t, in some cases. Perhaps it’s
desperation that leads some into the fold.
More chilling still, are indications that Verdants may try to
eliminate other aliens’ genes for emotion and sensitivity, genes
that might otherwise cause them to criticize Verdants or dispute
further takeovers. If there were too much empathy and sensitivity in
their genetic makeup, IFSP aliens might resent the conflicts and
atrocities that Verdant breeding program operatives manipulate on
target planets, i.e. those allegedly schemed by the IFSP’s “direct
operatives” here on Earth or those that a Verdant said were
manipulated on two other planets.
Humans who wonder whether this is
actually happening need to remember: the IFSP is a colonizer that
has a long history of such doings. They admit it.
So, in order to reduce tensions in the IFSP, are the genes for
troublemaking simply eliminated?
To do so would pose a different kind of danger. On the one hand, if
certain genes are eliminated a target population may be less
war-like, less violent. They can be more easily controlled. On the
other hand, if they're too easily controlled they may sit passively
and watch while wars are provoked among a target people and crises
are manipulated for advantage during subsequent takeovers.
genetically altered populations are easily exploited by aggressive sexuals like Verdants. Genetically altered aliens may be less
capable of the empathy and outspokenness needed to protest
manipulated crimes against target peoples. Obedient, genetically
modified aliens may feel less need to speak out against Verdant
manipulations, both within the IFSP and externally.
Evidence for this is seen in abductee reports about: aliens who
inflicted great pain as though to condition abductees, and aliens
who watched while a dazed adult human was forced to rape an
adolescent female abductee, apparently as part of an experiment.
(Secret Life, p. 203-4) The IFSP’s reported use of girls as young as
age 11 for reproduction is further evidence of emotional disconnect.
Non-IFSP aliens allege much worse, i.e. crimes against humanity
attributed to the IFSP’s “direct operatives.”
Direct operatives may be cultivated by the IFSP to commit acts of
extreme cruelty against humans. Human female abductees told David
Jacobs about being raped by human-looking hybrids who then
threatened to abuse their children if the women didn’t cooperate.
Abductee Beverly said that when she was abducted an alien told her
that to allow such hybrid cruelty against her while she was in an
alien craft was necessary because, as the alien said,
expression is necessary.”
(The Threat, p. 206)
In other words, if
the alien wasn’t referring to genetic expression, such cruelty may
necessary for some aspects of the IFSP intervention.
Of course, IFSP aliens say their work introduces humans to higher
order community of mind, a deeper sentience, yet non-IFSP aliens
suggest that the IFSP isn’t yet a community of mind but is, instead,
a psychotronically-policed empire.
So, we see the irony of highly
intelligent, seemingly peaceful aliens who’ve been altered so that
they can quietly, obediently create and infiltrate direct operatives
onto a target planet to orchestrate epic crimes in the name of the
alignment's expansion, which they rationalize as an improvement.
Meanwhile, the IFSP’s internal propaganda probably isn’t about
takeovers and manipulated conflicts. Instead, a target population is
probably first stigmatized as primitive or dangerous before breeding
and manipulated conflict programs are begun to pacify them. IFSP
discussions about such policies can be made to sound quite
wholesome, from such perspective.
To a certain extent, IFSP aliens can be selectively bred so that
they will say little about atrocities and corruptions by IFSP
operatives on subsequent target planets. Verdants claim to have
eliminated bad genes in order to improve such aliens, yet after more
than 100 million years of interventions Verdants know how to locate,
identify, and eliminate or alter those troublemaker genes that can
be so unsettling.
The end result can be disastrous in some respects: inwardly
repressed, compliant subordinates who don’t quite feel the pain and
horror of a target population. And, by keeping the train of genetic
"improvements" ever in motion among IFSP dependent
populations, Verdants can step in and tinker with troublemaker genes
when discontent arises.
Abductee Andrea told Harvard’s Dr.
John Mack about the emotional
sterility of her abductors.
“They’ve lost their home inside
themselves… they’ve evolved to something that’s not quite right,
that has something lacking. Their heart centers are not as open as
they should be. They have a feeling level that they’ve bred out.”
(Passport to the
Cosmos, p. 249)
Other abductees say alien females
who work in nurseries raising babies harvested from abductees are
coolly mechanical and don’t handle the babies affectionately.
Abductees describe such aliens as emotionally sterile.
Some abductees say abducting aliens study them, curious about strong
human feelings that they, themselves, seem to lack. One human-alien
hybrid told abductee Reshma Kamal that he feels like a robot.
When Reshma asked if the hybrid had at least some feelings, the hybrid
“Even if I had those emotions, what good are they because
nothing will happen? We’re just here to do work…” Looking at his
alien superiors, the hybrid said, “We have to do everything they
say...It’s just like they’re in total control of everything.”
(The Threat, p. 170)
How do such aliens rationalize what would, to us, seem to be
oppressive abuse of others’ sensitivities?
Since the “three ellipticals” hyperversal faction and its hybrid intermediaries
became more voluble in 2004, in my case, IFSP aliens have
communicated less, except when stimulated to do so. They’ve been
pre-empted. Aliens of the “three ellipticals” faction say that
overly emotional tendencies are eliminated to prevent conflicts and
Although they try to be subtle about it, their
emphasis is clearly on security. They give out other messages about
effectively managing various populations in order to prevent
violence and enforce the larger ecology. *It’s important to remember
that the “three ellipticals” project may be loosely construed and
may not yet have gained sway in three large ellipticals because the
future Milky Way-Andromeda elliptical doesn’t appear to be a likely
prospect, at the moment.
The given hyperversals may anticipate more
complex outcomes than would Verdants.
Of course, competing aliens (and some hyperversals) argue that when
a population has the requisite science, they may decide to
genetically improve themselves and shouldn’t necessarily be
compelled to do so. Implicit in the perspective is the assumption
that one alien group or another will either help or will provoke an
emerging population to make genetic changes.
Already, at this early stage in human-alien relations we see a
distinct pattern. At some point, technology began to distort some
aliens’ social relations. Rather than pace their societies according
to planetary ecology, some aliens were overcome by conformity,
curiosity, and a desire to compete with other worlds, which led them
to take the natural ecology for granted.
Technology fed a desire for
mastery and control. Weapons were developed and large-scale
rivalries became troublesome, so various large regimes attempted to
exert control over other aliens. There have been varying degrees of
that, ranging from loosely structured associations to seemingly
absolutist arrogations on a multi-galaxy scale. Aliens conditioned
to think they must intervene elsewhere to maintain order won’t ask
your permission before they do so.
Technology and regime one-ness of mind have stifled some aliens’
ability to think independently. Like IFSP grays they may imply that,
in a sense, they’re only shells
of the larger sentience. Social identity is certainly more advanced
than detachment, but critical judgment has been impaired in some
aliens. When the opportunity arises, the dominant aliens of an
alignment may prefer to eliminate too much emotion in other aliens,
rather than too little.
Consequently, there are cascading misjudgments when the regime turns
its attentions elsewhere. Emerging populations are cited as bad
examples, and some planets are destroyed during psychotronic
propaganda-driven interventions. Complicating such situations are
greater rivalries and the fatal ironies that arise when one rigidly
structured misconception compounds another.
The result can be a
mismatch between the delicate, naturally evolved reality of an
emerging planet’s biomes and the policies of an intervening regime.
In some cases, genetic modifications cause infirmities: elimination
of vital genes, and greatly extended lifetimes that lead to coldly
indifferent geriatric conditions.
Alien technology can fix body
wounds but can’t repair the withered sensitivities of regime-minded
In error-prone hyperversal sections, we’ve seen how easy it is for
some to simply ignore the consequences of bad policy. Instead, a
doting or indifferent hyperversal may suffer a kind of hyperplexity:
the desire to know more, travel more, and do more on a grander scale
than other aliens (which is something of an irony, given
hyperversals’ need to down-scale).
During interventions where independent critique is most needed,
there may be nearly none in an aggregate like the IFSP. Instead,
epic crimes are easily rationalized in terms of an idealized (yet
incomplete) social whole. Although the most primitive kinds of
individuality will long have been replaced by community concerns, a
next-step kind of critique may have been stifled in the process.
Outwardly, IFSP aliens seem to be immune to doubts and regrets about
damage done to humans.
According to abductees, grays and other IFSP
dependents almost never raise objections or protest the IFSP’s
manipulated crimes and abductions. Has their ability to do so been
genetically marginalized, or is the IFSP so controlling and
hierarchical that grays fear to cause trouble, in the first place?
In my own case, I’ve noted resonant gray concern about what happened
their original planet and could also happen here, but it’s
cautious and minimal, possibly for fear of Verdants.
Remember, in some alien alignments (like that of the grays), an
older, dominant population has created a variety of hybridized,
genetically contrived sub-populations who have no independent
history, no independent cultural traditions or critique, which is
why they don’t question what, to you, seem to be abusive policies.
In other words, an entire branch of downstream history in that alien
alignment is one of hierarchical obedience, and planned, manipulated
populations (which is why we sometimes see a lack of sympathy,
flexibility, and new ideas among them).
There are entire planets
occupied by such populations.
And how do they think of their own history?
Since they were created
by an older alien population, they trace their history back to it.
Having no independent legal or literary tradition, they tend to be
passive and dependent, rather than actively self-determining.
Finally, did Verdants eliminate certain genes for emotion in
themselves, or did another population do that to them long ago?
Hopefully, our native alien neighbors have done a better job of
preserving their sensitivities and critical judgment. One
hyperversal alien noted a kind of "unformed quality" in some IFSP
aliens, a lack of rigorous critique, which could be a handicap.
Meanwhile, IFSP aliens say we can neither appreciate their motives
nor the life they lead until we’ve actually lived within, and have
become part of, their kind of group identity. In Verdant minds,
reportedly, we're all scheduled to be discontinued, replaced by
Verdant and gray-engineered prototypes via their breeding program.
But how do they think to accomplish that? So far, IFSP aliens
haven’t divulged specifics. They may fear the response that might
elicit from human governments.
The IFSP’s kind of genetic engineering has led to a new category of
phenomena that we must now study, psychologies and susceptibilities
that may pose obstacles to equal, legally protected order in this
part of the universe. Deliberate dulling of aliens’ sensitivities
can be dangerous. It leads to situations in which mass crimes can be
committed with little or no resistance. There must be alternatives.
Imagine how it is to be an IFSP alien:
When faced with loss of
career, medical and highly technological life-support options for
having objected to the abuse of another people, how many IFSP aliens
will feel it’s safe to take on the entire Verdant bureaucracy?
Such abuses can only erode democratic rights and equal consideration
for all peoples. Situations will arise in which intelligent,
technological target populations are regarded as little more than
animals. That, in itself, poses a new category of bias and
discrimination: a specious disdain much like racism.
Such issues are important in informed discussion of human contacts
with other worlds. Basic rights and protections must be preserved
here before they are dangerously compromised, unaware to the human
majority. While we’re still able to do so, we need to raise such
Some aliens regard such concerns as a breath of fresh air in what
can, at times, seem to be a stifling and unfair exopolitical
Ultimately, our finest contributions may have to do
with human rights, creativity, and the independent critical judgment
of our best legal reasoning.
Back to Contents