AlienMind

The Verdants

12. - Hyperversals: a New Category of Aliens?
 

For years now, experiencers have written about a category of extraterrestrials who so greatly exceed aliens like the grays, for example, that descriptions sometimes fall short. Such aliens have been described as “non-physical” or hyper-dimensional.

In Jim Marrs’ book Alien Agenda, government-trained remote viewers reported that such aliens are physical but originated during a succession of previous universe cycles (something like a previous universe, but not exactly). Instead, according to such reports, they’re all part of the same, overall universe. In order for that to be possible, the universal continuum, itself, would have to be much older than 13 billion years.

Cosmologists have toyed with the idea of a re-cycling universe, yet until articles about negative energy and marginally faster-than-light physics were published during recent years, a re-cycling universe was largely considered impossible. All evidence pointed toward one tiny singularity at the beginning of time. From such
perspective, there was nothing, there could have been nothing before that first zero moment. The problem with such models was that they were all based on scant knowledge about black holes, in the first place.

More recently, the notion of a multiverse - a succession of interconnected, or inter-dimensioning universes, has been advanced by cosmologists.

String theorists suggest that a previous “brane,” a sheet-like fabric of time existing in a previous universe, could have connected with our “brane” to cause the current universe to come into form. US science journals are fairly conservative in speculating about a multiverse, preferring to limit their articles to sketchy notions about a fifth dimension, or mathematical models of extra dimensions (i.e. “branes” as some string theorists call them).

Non-US magazines like New Scientist discuss multiversal possibilities more freely, i.e. Marcus Chown’s well-reasoned excursions into the subject.

See Michio Kaku’s article about escaping to another universe.  In New Scientist, one British scientist argued that a new model of physics could be premised on a more flexible notion of time, alone.

Yet another suggested that during a previous universe cycle, aliens endangered by waning energy conditions could have engineered a new universe into being. He didn’t suggest how they might have done so, but other theorists like Steven Hawking have suggested that by manipulating the energy vs. negative energy status of a black hole, a kind of white hole could conceivably be created.

In short, the old Einstein limit could be exceeded.

Hawking theorized that particles or quanta (discrete packets of energy) could escape from a black hole if “negative energy” fluctuations caused by “tidal shifts” within a black hole were to allow particles to briefly exceed the speed of light and escape the black hole -  provided, of course, they slowed down for an equally brief period of time after escaping the event horizon.

For years Hawking bet colleagues that no information, no recognizable pattern within such quanta, could escape a black hole. Then, in 2004, Hawking reversed himself and admitted that he’d probably lost the bet. New models showed that information (a kind of order) contained within what goes into a black hole, could escape from a black hole, although Hawking suggests that we might not be able to decipher it, given the mainstream assumption that there are no faster-than-light physics (an assumption that aliens say is incorrect).

So, although theorists like Hawking still debate whether we might be able to see a “naked” singularity, a physically detectable black hole that somehow exceeds its event horizon, the question of whether black holes have a measurable “memory,” of sorts, has now come into mainstream scientific play. The possibility that information can somehow be cycled through black holes is now discussed by internationally recognized theorists. (See Scientific American, Nov. 2004)

This has far-reaching implications.

For example, as was noted earlier, if, toward the end of a given universe cycle (its habitable stability) aliens were to coordinate their actions universally, they could post electrogravity craft near all black holes in the universe in order to create a new universe cycle. By sharply tilting the energy vs. negative energy balance of all such black holes at the same time, they could cause them to “bleed into” a white hole, a new universe.
 

Remember Tom Bearden’s reciprocity discussed in earlier pages? It says that when light converges from three different directions so that it cancels out, the energy bleeds into electrogravity - and conversely, if electrogravity converges so that it cancels out, it bleeds back into light waves.

Believe it or not, that may be the basic recipe for creating a new universe.

By posting drone ships near black holes (massive reservoirs of negative energy) while removing all participating aliens to contained craft far out in space, a new universe could be created.

Different kinds of electrogravity (and related phenomena) would have to be modeled and manipulated to “create” discrete structures of space and quanta in a successive cycle. Any civilization intent on doing so would no doubt wait until this universe was nearing the end of its habitability. To do so would be a major feat and would have enduring political and ecological implications.

For example, aliens with inadequate, primitive technology might be killed by the creation of a new universe. Presumably, only aliens with advanced electrogravity and other alternate-cycle technology would be able to survive such a transition. And where would they get such technology?

It would likely have been created by aliens who had previously shielded themselves in order to survive the shock and radiation of supernovas and hypernovas (when black holes combine). It would also have been refined by aliens who had previously moved to small, icy planets where an electrogravity (and “magneto-gravitic”) field had to be effected in order to contain an atmosphere and do terra-forming (stabilization of an atmosphere and a water cycle to allow for habitation).

Apparently, “magneto-gravitics” is another kind of destructive interference (like that of the TR-3B) involving high-energy fields or plasmas that are spun around at high r.p.m.’s through toroidal (circular) tubes. Magnetogravitics are now produced by black budget manipulators in the United States, reportedly.

See “Classified Advanced Antigravity Aerospace Craft Utilizing Back-engineered Extraterrestrial Technology” by Richard Boylan.

Boylan suggests that even more-advanced, reverse engineered technologies produced by humans tease the “strong force” out of the inner atomic nuclei of heavy “trans-uranic” elements like “Element 115” reported by Bob Lazar. All such technologies are premised on negative energy (or alternate) cycles and apparently involve destructive interference of different (or combined) sorts.

* One alternative way of thinking about such technologies is that they are based on a more advanced physics of “effects” rather than the “forces” of Bob Lazar’s model. Such effects can cohere on higher levels yet the social lessons that must accompany such technologies haven’t yet been learned by criminal elitists on this planet. That is one of the major dilemmas of our time and must be resolved before too much damage is done to this planet.

The initiation of a new universe cycle would be an awe-inspiring, beautiful moment but would be fraught with contradictions and the need for all advanced “hyperversal” aliens to both coordinate, and act together at the very same moment. Peaceful coordination on such a scale doesn’t just happen by itself. It would have to be accomplished. It would require humility, a shared vision of all participating aliens in the universe. All such aliens would have to reduce their numbers in order to survive the moment. Greed and violence would have to be overcome.

So, what would be the main theme among such beings? Once again, a shared ecology, not a piggish scramble for real estate. Living within an already inhabited, hyper-advanced universe, humans who might think that greed is the best way to get ahead of the alien pack would probably be seen as weird, undesirable primitives. According to numerous aliens’ reports, larger precedent has already been set. Regimes of violent, classist greed are less able to maintain a survivable ecology. Entire planets “die,” at intervals. In some cases, they are manipulated toward such ends.

Those who suspect that this discussion about hyperversal aliens is headed in a certain direction are correct.

On May 6, 2004 one apprehensive population of hyperversal aliens, or hyperversals, initiated explicit contact here, in no uncertain terms, by stating that, yes, they did originate during a previous universe cycle. As far as I know, this was the first time such aliens had gone semi-public in announcing their existence. Certain official sources here, on Earth, had previously hinted at such beings, i.e. in one rumored French government report.

* The French government has been less retarded than the US government in publishing its findings about aliens, i.e. the French defense ministry’s COMETA report, and the year 2004 report “UFO’s the Evidence” by Dr Jean Jacques Velasco, head of SEPRA, a unit of the French equivalent of NASA.

Years earlier, an unusually advanced, non-federation alien had almost casually remarked, here, that the Verdants are seen as efficient ciphers, scribes who tend to, and compile data that more advanced aliens can later draw upon. This was stated in passing, but was starkly different in character from previous aliens’ remarks.

At the time, we, humans, were trying to put what we were seeing into larger, coherent perspective, so I assumed the given alien was either unusually presumptuous or that something was going on that far exceeded the Verdants. In fact, there had been other remarks of the sort, statements that coolly and confidently put the Verdants in their place, as though the alien(s) making the statements had large-scale insights of some unknown sort.

For example, one day several years ago while I lay awake in bed, the more advanced (than Verdant) aliens demonstrated their capabilities by seeming to change both the nature and the order of time, its very structure, right before me as I lay, eyes closed but “watching” attentively! Years later, another hyper-advanced alien explained that they had simply looped time in more complex ways.

For years prior to the event, I’d interacted with aliens closer on the evolutionary scale to humans, so I wasn’t one to be unduly impressed by basic, off-world capabilities and electrogravity. But the looped-time incident was vivid and deliberate, far beyond the capabilities of gray/federation aliens (a fact that gray/federation aliens seemed to acknowledge later) and was done to make a statement of some sort. It essentially took the lid off of the Verdant-imposed ceiling over humankind.

Apparently, there were more advanced others of some unspecified sort.

Back to the morning of May 6, 2004 - years afterward: I awoke on May 6 after experiencing sleep interruptions done by federation-related aliens when someone such as myself stands out for sharply criticizing their activities. The night before I’d been involved in an argument during which, as an aside, I firmly, but reluctantly warned “grays” that humans have a right to defend against the type of scheme that appears to have killed the original gray planet (reportedly in the Large Magellenic Cloud - image right), which furthered Verdant predations there.

Being a critic of Verdant provocations, I felt it necessary to state a basic truth about the human predicament.

For years, I had argued the grays’ case against the Verdants while investigating the manipulated-conflict scheme that alien sources say Verdants imposed on the original gray planet, which led to its death. I’m seen as unusual for having done so.

More noteworthy, of course, are the efforts of alien individuals who go out of their way to report on the subject. My investigations into Verdant doings are more explicit than those of most humans. In part, this stems from ongoing help and information offered by sympathetic, non-federation aliens, some of which is noted in previous chapters (i.e. re remote probing).

Again, on the night of May 5, 2004 I’d warned grays that humans could logically be expected to use lethal force to ward off abductors working a takeover and possible planet-killing Verdant scheme here. It was the first time I’d “spoken” so bluntly, and I discerned that various aliens attending to the exchange felt that a critical threshold had been reached.

Little did I know who would respond, later…

Early the next morning, I was awoken and critiqued (the usual kind of communicated exchange) by a hyper-advanced alien I’d previously criticized for acting like “the boy in the bubble” by offering comments from highly advanced, yet idealized remove from the Verdants’ brutal scheme here. The hyper-advanced alien was clearly more evolved than the Verdants yet seemed to loft any argument about Verdants into cryptic, large-scale terms, attributing a seemingly round quality to such considerations. Given Verdant violations here, I’d expected more trenchant legal distinctions, at least some acknowledgement that humans have valid grievances.

Then, quite unexpectedly, the given alien admitted that his population had evolved before what humans call the Big Bang! He also hinted that the current universe cycle had been engineered, in part. It was a semi-public admission that life had existed in great number during a previous universe cycle. In short, if the report is correct, the universe is much older than a mere 12.7 billion years. Then, in order to demonstrate that the story was told in earnest, the alien opened up the entire context of previous, related demonstrations, noting that they were the work of his kind. The experience had the same depth, a different feel from the coarser, more crudely framed Verdant doings.

Later that day, one of the hyperversal aliens showed a graphic “visual” record of how it was for them to sit in a contained hyper-environment as our current-cycle universe was initiated billions of years ago. In the visual, a crowd of aliens stood within a large, contained space. Containing them overhead was a large orb-shaped, electrogravitically-effected shield at the moment when the old universe was manipulated to initiate a new cycle, a new extension of the then-failing old “universe.”

The subject was treated with deep gravity, a most somber message. Those who witnessed it were awed; we’d never imagined anything like it. The best approximation would be to imagine that you live on a small planet or a very large, rounded, artificial “craft” at the exact moment when a big supernova, or worse yet, a big hypernova occurs (caused by combining black holes), which would kill everyone, were they not shielded.

In the hyperversal alien’s graphic, a momentous, apprehensive pause ensued as they watched the dome above rush with a muted red-orange color: some vast, cataclysmic event described as the initiation of a new universe cycle. It resembled the contained weathering of a supernova/hypernova and appeared to involve fades of body, like those described by the Elders when they travel at faster-than-light speeds. Tense, eerie quiet ensued, a collective pause of an extraordinary sort as the moments passed.

Of course, humans found this profound, deeply wrought with implications. It was a day that one remembers for life, a major marker that seemed to redefine a number of basic assumptions.

Nonetheless, we were on the watch for fawning and simplistic tendencies, the inability of some humans to maintain their acumen beyond such a threshold, to hold up their critical awareness. Although it was a profound moment in the history of human-alien interactions, I nonetheless walked the hyperversal who initiated the contact through a series of questions.

Mindful of the context in which the given hyperversal alien had initiated explicit, open contact as a hyperversal (at a moment surrounding remarks about a human defense against the Verdant IFSP scheme), I mentioned the above-noted human “direct operatives” (one a Swiss-French arms manufacturer and former mutual funds owner in the US, the other a leading Jewish financier in Europe - R...?) who reportedly further the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) scheme here.

The hyperversal alien suggested that I shouldn’t verge on the notion of violence toward grays.

Apparently a non-sexual of a seemingly gentle sort, he suggested that the gray story was a complicated one that merited deeper, moderated reserve. I said I hadn’t advocated harming the grays, but had argued otherwise for years, mindful of the Verdant-related debacle that killed the grays’ home planet, causing the grays to lose the only mature, naturally evolved biome that may ever be allowed them.

Due to their misfortune, some of the grays are perpetual guest-dependents tasked by the Verdants.

The hyper-advanced alien who initiated contact is part of a population I tentatively refer to as the –X3’s ( “-“ for negative energy users, “X” for hyperversals, and “3” for the fact that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third, more complicated dynamic).

The -X3 alien/spokesperson replied that a human collective premise will arrive at some vaguely gray-like status, over time, irregardless of short-term human choices. I countered that –X3 fails to make basic, legal distinctions, that –X3’s cohort population isn’t actively engaged here, nor is –X3’s cohort doing basic, day-to-day physical duty here.

One of –X3’s related associates, using a staged Verdant-like filter, countered that I, myself, am not yet “effective” in correcting certain problems here (human violence, inequality, etc). I countered that further time is necessary to both propagate and evolve a more advanced planetary basis to correct such problems.

I said that Verdants propagate conflict, essentially enslaving grays through lies, deception and destruction that allows a corrupt, overgrown population of sexuals (the Verdants) to lead nonsexuals (grays), which could be dangerous.

–X3 replied glibly and without detail, saying that humans would arrive at some collective premise, anyway - essentially rationalizing that violently schemed Verdant ends justify the means, perhaps… At this juncture, other aliens, some of a hyperversal character, offered critiques of –X3. This was greatly helpful, in that we, humans, were over our heads in a subject about which we knew little.

I tentatively refer to the hyperversals who criticize the –X3’s as –Xn’s (n for a possible extra integer and/or character). The –Xn’s are another group or faction of hyperversals who are either equal to, or more advanced than the –X3’s. Again, one must remember that, toward the end of a previous universe cycle, there would then have been many advanced aliens, some of different origins from different systems. Some would now be more independent-minded, more rigorous in their thinking than others, i.e. those from collectives that might, at times, favor the bland generalizations of a given community.

–Xn said that the –X3’s had directed Verdants to our location in the Milky Way, effectively aiding the Verdants in initiating activities here. –Xn also noted that –X3’s group deliberately informs Verdants of the location of some newly technological planets like our own, hence the –X3’s apparently rationalize that some planets will be killed - which could, in some ways, accommodate certain of the –X3’s.

One or more of the –Xn’s elucidated that some of the –X3 population’s associates do so as a deliberate strategy. At this juncture, –X3 was listening attentively and had ample opportunity to correct -Xn if this were untrue, but he didn’t, which may be tacit admission that the allegation was correct. In alien community-of-mind communications, honesty isn’t merely optional, it is required because dishonesty is easily detectable and lacks coherence, hence dishonesty has a failed, seemingly more physical, anatomical character.

Honesty is more intelligent because it connects on a larger, finer scale through shared, scientific transparency (even if, at times, honesty may feel uncomfortable).

One hyperversal stated that the –X3’s had to change, in part, to a lighter elemental composition in order to ride out and survive the initiation of a new universe cycle.

Whether this involved selectively using electrogravity to simply remove heavy elements, or a more complex genetic strategy, I can’t say.

* Later, at various junctures hyperversal aliens indicated that the huge, orb-like UFO’s with darkened centers that swarm around the US space shuttle in Canadian public television engineer Martyn Stubbs’ copy of NASA video (showing part of the shuttle tether experiment) are hyperversal aliens’ craft making a deliberate, visual appearance for human eyes.

The –X3’s and the -Xn‘s both defer to, and appear to interact with, a larger host of other hyperversal populations. Indeed, some of the other hyperversals are so advanced that they challenge one’s notion of possibilities.

For example, one (or more) of them later demonstrated an ability to literally pose what would happen, or would have happened were a human (myself, in this case) to have chosen unwisely/unecologically at a given moment. In a literally awesome display, the hyperversal (not a -X3, by the way) drew upon a variety of time horizons, of sorts, to quickly elucidate various outcomes that would happen to me were a variety of bad choices made.

The strange part of the demonstration was that it appeared to bend time around, to reach both back and forward in time, in order to do so - across a multiplicity of actual “event horizons.” No federation alien has demonstrated such a capability, to my knowledge.

More importantly, the other, more advanced (than -X3) populations appear to be more capable than the –X3’s yet are more finely, deeply integrated into the continuum. Some of their existence and doings appear to dimension right through us and our surroundings, in that other universe cycles appear to either echo through ours via different directions in time, or co-exist with us - with much larger implications.

Perhaps you, the reader, have witnessed extraordinarily intelligent manifestations of hyperversal consciousness communicating sentient implications of right and wrong, good ecology and analysis vs. bad. The reason you may have witnessed such is that hyperversals can both ghost, and see through, the activities of lesser aliens. They can do so without leaving much trace. Their capabilities leave one thinking that the old notion of physical limits is a most specious pretension.

We all inter-dimension, apparently, hence many our old 20^th century conventions are drastically inadequate.

Again, to return to that first May 6, 2003 interaction with hyperversals: Mindful of my concerns about recent IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) manipulations in US history, –X3 posed that presidents Kennedy and Johnson were simply (in context of the 1965 Indonesian genocide and the US assassinations) tools of elitist indifference, a failed violent strategy.

I countered that Verdant-related Biderman-DuPonts were among the worst of same, to begin with (this is widely, specifically known off-world, hence I wasn’t dropping a new idea into the mix).

Later –X3 allowed that the Verdants could be wrong in their strategy, of course. At the time, I was looking for diversity of origin and outlook among the –X3’s after various other hyperversals’ critiques had been noted, which was encouraging. –X3 argued that the grays played a vital role in introducing humans to advanced concepts, collective considerations and genetic/nonsexual considerations, etc. I countered that our non-destructive, non-colonizing, non planet-killing neighbors may do that better - without mobbing up the situation in self-interested, colonial fashion.

I argued that our best strategy is to reduce population, to work toward a better ecology than Verdants exemplify.

I argued the concept of basic, universal law (laws common to all societies) with specific adjustments, allowing for evolution and regeneration in certain cases. In reply, –X3 tended toward generality and bland remarks that we would ultimately arrive at collective reckonings, anyway. –X3 also said we don’t need to kill grays (for whom –X3’s have some liabilities), that, instead, we can prevail through informed awareness (this was stated with emphasis).

Two or more other –Xn‘s critiqued (the given) –X3, who I accused of failing to make basic distinctions for Verdant mass crimes against humans.

One sharply worded –Xn critique of the -X3’s fleshed out -X3’s reasoning and said that if we (the larger, non-Verdant convention) were to correct Verdants and cohere on a larger scale, we would be “more capable” because “we would (potentially) be able to return to” the next universe cycle. At the time –Xn was dimensioning through and elucidating the truth of –X3’s argument.

This was an important, if not epochal, point. –X3 was thus posed as having assumed that the Verdant scheme would foul our collective large-scale convention, disallowing our large-scale capability and preventing us from returning to existence via the next universal cycle (to be effected at some future date).

Wary of any –X3 assumption that might condemn humans to failure, I followed up on the subject at intervals.

Later, one alien associated with the –X3’s asked (re the Verdants):

“Do you know what they later become?”, hinting that the federation may be tasked with end-of-cycle duties - after Verdants have evolved considerably.

This kind of thinking assumes, de facto, that mega-populations (like the –X3’s) have some common characteristics. Basic issues surrounding mega-populations will be discussed in a later chapter.
 

Other hyperversals attending to the exchange noted that by using a hybrid intermediary (who seems to have some human characteristics), the –X3’s had previously argued that any use of electrogravity here by recently evolved aliens, took away from –X3’s system’s vital duration, dimming the minds/lifetimes of their progeny by shortening the duration of their calculated cycle. The individual was trying to argue that excess use of electrogravity would endanger the sensitivities of yet more-advanced hyperversals.

This was done with a melodramatic flare, as though a hyperversal child would be endangered, dimmed out at a vulnerable time. Knowing that Verdants squander vast amounts of energy at the expense of other peoples, I preferred to wait for better, more scientific evidence. Later, a less dogmatic hyperversal admitted that if humans were to opt for a conventional energy strategy, coupled with tightly limited, fine-scale use of electrogravity, such usage would threaten hyperversals no more than a falling stone upon a mountain might threaten a human.

So, I raised the basic question: Can we not all share?

Later, the next night, this opened up a remarkably coherent human-community consideration of the subject.

To help walk humans through the stiffly posed conundrum of the –X3’s first explicit interactions here, one of the –Xn’s argued that –X3 fails to dimension time as we all must, hence –X3 argues a blandly generalized bias against this universe cycle’s lifeforms.

In other words, are we all lumped into the undesirable category?

Again, taking time away from my normal working routine (for obvious reasons) I returned the conversation to questions of basic ecology, population reduction and non-violence - basic neighborly considerations. I had one lingering question about the –X3’s: whether the –X3’s are “capable” of sorting out disputes in our neighborhood in terms of the pending merger of the Milky Way-Andromeda community vs. the bizarrely manipulative Verdant scheme, here, at the moment.

In this regard, some of the –X3’s appear to be vulnerable to, and can be held to, basic honesty.

We all agreed that life must be shared and respected, but the –X3 premise and their Verdant links throw a cruel and calculated bone into our situation. I would be remiss if I didn’t note that the –X3’s are apparently but one group within a much larger, interacting variety of hyperversals. There is highly thoughtful diversity among hyperversals.

So, is the –X3’s premise elitist (albeit a commonality)?

In response, –X3 says the –X3’s are more consistent than that. The question is open to further consideration, but the competing hyperversal’s report about the “more capable” and “return to” assumption lingers. In other words, among some hyperversals is there a kind of bias against this universe cycle’s recently evolved aliens?

–X3 may not be able to see the present, all-of-time implications of indirectly propagating Verdant crimes while not exposing them, not organizing a better collective response.

Moreover, the disproportionate size of the Verdant population and their abuse of vulnerable peoples suggests that the –X3’s may have failed to curb an epic offender, if indeed they ever even intended to do so in the first place (although they may have a multi-faceted policy re the Verdants).

At present, the Verdants seem to have reached their own sustainable limit, yet they continue to reproduce sexually and intrude upon, then deprive numerous lesser populations of resources. The Verdant case, coupled with the –X3’s compromised posture, suggests that in this part of the Virgo supercluster the –X3’s may not be as effective as they may be elsewhere. The inference owes to the predatory habits and sheer, inflated greed of the Verdant population.

Question remains as to whether a kind of deal was struck with the Verdants, one that may be regarded as having compromised our neighboring populations. They may do a limited kind of trade with each other. Worse yet, at times the –X3’s appear to view newly-evolved populations in basically prototypical terms, in that –X3’s sometimes lapse into a coldly distanced forgetfulness about their own essentially animal “nature” and origins.

On the other hand, the –Xn‘s timely ability to counter certain –X3 assumptions offers hope within the –X3 context. However, such hope is only as good as is the human ability to transcend the Verdant scheme, which, at the moment, has assumed epic proportions.

In other words, humans are caught within a kind of fail-safe duality:

we either overcome the animal tendencies of our most corrupt, planet-destroying elites (among the worst of whom are “direct” IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets - operatives, reportedly) or we could easily perish.

Apparently, more advanced populations don’t leave much room for upstart primitives to propagate outward.

One critique aired by a competing alien at this juncture was that the –X3’s consider all current cycle aliens as primitive, if not dangerously undesirable, hence their prototypical treatment of humans as a people.

In view of the above, it appears that we need to work out a better human awareness of basic hyper-dynamics, the actual history and implications of a deeply inhabited universe. For example, given the –X3’s aloofness and prototypical mindset, we may need to field a tighter legalistic, more deeply communicated collective response to Verdant-like abusers of the local ecology. On the other hand, the simple existence of a secure hyperversal community like the –X3’s has implications that could transcend the fear-mongering predations of the Verdants.

On balance, this and other evidence for the existence of advanced, hyperversal aliens suggest that we live in a universe that is smarter than had previously seemed possible.

As for myself, I’m but one, small part of a community of like-minded others who study such situations closely. I’m impressed by the smooth and attentive humility of the many humans who witnessed the above, the clean, clear way that collective human reasoning has developed in such regard.

Note: several months ago, one of the –Xn’s stated that, due to the nature of the interactions to which I am party, at least “30,000” humans and others “have to” keep track of the interactions, to some extent. Given the fact that such interactions stand out in semi-public profile, due to ongoing alien inputs, I’m not surprised to hear such a number.

In years past, had I foreseen what is now happening here and elsewhere on the globe, I would have marveled at both the events, and the order, the humble clarity with which they have occurred, the absence of weirdly backward human interlocutors.

 
Even before the hyperversals manifested openly here, I had suggested that it is meaningless for humans to re-invent the stone, so to speak.

Instead, I encouraged others to pick up in terms of the best and most advanced of all contemporary aliens (anywhere), to try as best we can to not go back, thereafter. Apparently, the lessons of other kinds aren’t lost on us because transformations of the sort profoundly change the thoughts of humans who communicate such understandings to others.

I should note that information in this book hasn’t come to me easily. Instead, it followed after years of struggle, direct IFSP deceptions and misrepresentations. In the process, I’ve endured daily spats, both with IFSP aliens and with one contingent of –X3-related others (i.e. hybridized intermediaries) who at times try to steer humans into the Verdant fold.

 
The –X3-related contingent’s prime, stated reason? To effect a human change from sexual reproduction, to non-sexual in order to put humans on a more ecological footing.

In addition, during the course of various discussions, political and scientific information sharing, and more, I was shown that grays used electrogravity (or another combination of negative energy fluctuations) to kill US soldiers who attempted to prevent roughly 60 grays from escaping captivity in an underground US base some years back.

This was demonstrated through amplification of an electrogravity field inside my own head, while a friendly, non-federation alien commented on the process, saying that the grays escaped by psychotronically coordinating an energy weapon activated from outside, not by simply using their thought waves. I felt sharp pain due to sudden pressure pushing outward from within all of my brain structure.

On another occasion, what appeared to be a –X3 hybrid (or a related alien) used electrogravity to put a kind of Dt freeze on my liver function, causing mild pain there for days, after I’d mentioned that the Verdant strategy toward Earth smacked of “a war-like tactic.” I was advised to discontinue remote probing of the Verdants’ main ship while a “potentially lethal” use of energy was being directed toward me.

I held off for about 10 days.

(* I should note that, at the time, I was smack in the middle of sharply worded, direct exposures of Verdant doings here, which proved extremely embarrassing for them - exposures partly informed by non-federation aliens.)

Over time, now that I’m able to distinguish –X3 related communications from those of other aliens, I’ve come to see that the –X3’s can be highly manipulative, themselves. They prefer to remotely ghost the Verdants, in part to give humans a direct, unmistakable taste of what the Verdant collective is actually like, or could be expected to do if humans were to capitulate. In part, the –X3’s see a need to tend to the situation here. Without a doubt, the –X3’s and other hyperversals see the Verdants as less evolved than they are. Hyperversals tend to act as though Verdants don’t pose a major risk to them.

Nonetheless, hyperversals stress that humans shouldn’t act in ways that might allow the Verdants remote entry to, hence the opportunity to copy, hyperversal technology for which the Verdants might not be responsible. The consequences could be fatal, both to humankind, and other populations, given previous Verdant offenses.

More importantly, hyperversals appear to live in or near every major galaxy in this universe.

This has been stated over and over again by hyperversals. So, hyperversals probably trade with lesser empires/collectives like that of the Verdants.

This poses a risk to humans, in that, should we fail, our system could conceivably be cannibalized by both Verdants and hyperversals, i.e. Verdants taking nearby planets where they have reportedly stationed their enclaves, or the –X3’s using other relic aspects of our system. To some this may seem a far-fetched assertion, yet aliens have repeatedly stated that a biological beauty like Earth is rare and coveted.

Given that hyperversals appear to inhabit and influence galaxies like our own, further questions arise.

For example, do the –X3’s distance themselves from evolving populations like ours in order to avoid being asked for direct help in cases of conflict?

If such were the case, they wouldn’t have to concern themselves with posing actual, physical aid to lesser populations. Hyperversals would be reluctant to do so, as is consistent with their plan to cultivate responsibility among younger populations, plus their need to veil as much of their technology and capacities from the greedy hands of other aliens like the Verdants.

At times, I’ve detected a hint of genetic elitism among the –X3’s and their associates. Sometimes it almost seems as though their hyper-advanced technology allows them to coast along on autopilot.

On other occasions, I’ve noted –X3’s acting with a kind of “fill factor” presumption: the mistaken notion that they can scan out all of the intelligent implications in the space-time surrounding a situation like that of Earth.

This can cause a –X3 to lapse into self-centered, singular misconception, as though he/she occupies or is equal to all that he/she can access. In other words, a hyperversal can confuse his or her awareness of the universe (inherently limited), with the larger universe, itself. It’s an easy mistake to make.

There’s an illusory quality to time that humans are only beginning to understand, basic questions about the limits of a larger kind of out-of-body awareness. There are subtle event horizons in time that can easily deceive one.
 

As one –Xn critic of the –X3’s noted, some of the –X3’s more distressing shortcomings can be attributed to their basic “biology,” their animal origins.

One coldly calculating security section affiliated with the –X3’s sometimes hews so closely to the Verdant routine that I must re-examine a given interaction to sort out which group was trying to stump humans and cause them to lapse into low-order, concretized notions of life: the security section, or the Verdants?

 

* About 18 months after I first learned about hyperversals, a –Xn hyperversal stated that one apparent leader in the given hyperversal security section is from a larger elliptical galaxy.

At various junctures there had been cryptic indications that hyperversals either living in or tasked to the large elliptical galaxy Centaurus A (neighboring the Verdants) were among this security section. I had noted the one leader, in particular, on numerous occasions.

The –Xn hyperversal further stated that the given (security section) hyperversal had essentially been “in his retirement garden” when a disturbance occurred that threatened the planned stability of his (either home or assigned) galaxy.

In other words, the security-tasked hyperversal who appears surrounding the Verdants may have had mixed sentiments about how Verdants were later steered outward into other galaxies.

* I’ll refer to this (presumably Centaurus A) hyperversal and his security section in later pages.