For years now, experiencers have written about a category of extraterrestrials who so greatly exceed aliens like the grays, for example, that descriptions sometimes fall short. Such aliens have been described as “non-physical” or hyper-dimensional.
In Jim Marrs’ book Alien Agenda, government-trained remote viewers reported that such aliens are physical but originated during a succession of previous universe cycles (something like a previous universe, but not exactly). Instead, according to such reports, they’re all part of the same, overall universe. In order for that to be possible, the universal continuum, itself, would have to be much older than 13 billion years.
String theorists suggest that a
previous “brane,” a sheet-like fabric of time existing
in a previous universe, could have connected with our “brane” to
cause the current universe to come into form. US
science journals are fairly conservative in speculating about a
multiverse, preferring to limit their articles to sketchy
notions about a fifth dimension, or mathematical models of extra
dimensions (i.e. “branes” as some string theorists
See Michio Kaku’s article about escaping to another universe. In New Scientist, one British scientist argued that a new model of physics could be premised on a more flexible notion of time, alone.
Yet another suggested that during a previous universe cycle, aliens endangered by waning energy conditions could have engineered a new universe into being. He didn’t suggest how they might have done so, but other theorists like Steven Hawking have suggested that by manipulating the energy vs. negative energy status of a black hole, a kind of white hole could conceivably be created.
In short, the old Einstein limit could be exceeded.
This has far-reaching implications.
Remember Tom Bearden’s reciprocity discussed in earlier pages? It says that when light converges from three different directions so that it cancels out, the energy bleeds into electrogravity - and conversely, if electrogravity converges so that it cancels out, it bleeds back into light waves.
Believe it or not, that may be the basic recipe for creating a new universe.
By posting drone ships near black holes (massive reservoirs of negative energy) while removing all participating aliens to contained craft far out in space, a new universe could be created.
electrogravity (and related phenomena) would have to be modeled
and manipulated to “create” discrete
structures of space and quanta in a successive cycle. Any
civilization intent on doing so would no doubt wait until
this universe was nearing the end of its habitability. To do so
would be a major feat and would have enduring political and
would likely have been created by aliens who had
previously shielded themselves in order to survive the shock and
black holes combine). It would also have been refined by aliens who
had previously moved to small, icy planets
where an electrogravity (and “magneto-gravitic”) field had to be
effected in order to contain an atmosphere and do
terra-forming (stabilization of an atmosphere and a water cycle to
allow for habitation).
alternative way of thinking about such technologies is
that they are based on a more advanced physics of “effects” rather
than the “forces” of Bob Lazar’s model. Such
effects can cohere on higher levels yet the social lessons that must
accompany such technologies haven’t yet been
learned by criminal elitists on this planet. That is one of the
major dilemmas of our time and must be resolved before
too much damage is done to this planet.
* The French
government has been less retarded than the US government in
publishing its findings about aliens, i.e. the French defense
COMETA report, and the year 2004
report “UFO’s the Evidence” by Dr Jean Jacques Velasco,
head of SEPRA, a unit of the French equivalent of NASA.
At the time, we,
humans, were trying to put what we were seeing into larger, coherent
perspective, so I assumed the given alien was
either unusually presumptuous or that something was going on that
far exceeded the Verdants. In fact, there had
been other remarks of the sort, statements that coolly and
confidently put the Verdants in their place, as though the
alien(s) making the statements had large-scale insights of some
For years prior to the event, I’d interacted with aliens closer on the evolutionary scale to humans, so I wasn’t one to be unduly impressed by basic, off-world capabilities and electrogravity. But the looped-time incident was vivid and deliberate, far beyond the capabilities of gray/federation aliens (a fact that gray/federation aliens seemed to acknowledge later) and was done to make a statement of some sort. It essentially took the lid off of the Verdant-imposed ceiling over humankind.
Apparently, there were more advanced others of some unspecified sort.
Being a critic of Verdant
provocations, I felt it necessary to state a basic truth about the
More noteworthy, of course, are the efforts of alien
individuals who go out of their way to report on
the subject. My investigations into Verdant doings are more explicit
than those of most humans. In part, this stems
from ongoing help and information offered by sympathetic,
non-federation aliens, some of which is noted in previous
chapters (i.e. re remote probing).
The hyperversal alien suggested that I shouldn’t verge on the notion of violence toward grays.
Apparently a non-sexual of a seemingly gentle sort, he suggested that the gray story was a complicated one that merited deeper, moderated reserve. I said I hadn’t advocated harming the grays, but had argued otherwise for years, mindful of the Verdant-related debacle that killed the grays’ home planet, causing the grays to lose the only mature, naturally evolved biome that may ever be allowed them.
The -X3 alien/spokesperson replied that a human collective premise will arrive at some vaguely gray-like status, over time, irregardless of short-term human choices. I countered that –X3 fails to make basic, legal distinctions, that –X3’s cohort population isn’t actively engaged here, nor is –X3’s cohort doing basic, day-to-day physical duty here.
One of –X3’s related associates,
using a staged Verdant-like filter, countered that I, myself, am not
yet “effective” in correcting certain problems here
(human violence, inequality, etc). I countered that further time is
necessary to both propagate and evolve a more
advanced planetary basis to correct such problems.
–X3 replied glibly and without detail, saying that humans
would arrive at some collective premise,
anyway - essentially rationalizing that violently schemed Verdant ends
justify the means, perhaps… At this juncture,
other aliens, some of a hyperversal character, offered critiques of
–X3. This was greatly helpful, in that we, humans,
were over our heads in a subject about which we knew little.
–Xn said that the –X3’s had directed Verdants to our location in the Milky Way, effectively aiding the Verdants in initiating activities here. –Xn also noted that –X3’s group deliberately informs Verdants of the location of some newly technological planets like our own, hence the –X3’s apparently rationalize that some planets will be killed - which could, in some ways, accommodate certain of the –X3’s.
One or more of the –Xn’s elucidated that some of the –X3 population’s associates do so as a deliberate strategy. At this juncture, –X3 was listening attentively and had ample opportunity to correct -Xn if this were untrue, but he didn’t, which may be tacit admission that the allegation was correct. In alien community-of-mind communications, honesty isn’t merely optional, it is required because dishonesty is easily detectable and lacks coherence, hence dishonesty has a failed, seemingly more physical, anatomical character.
Honesty is more intelligent because it connects on a larger, finer scale through shared, scientific transparency (even if, at times, honesty may feel uncomfortable).
One hyperversal stated that the –X3’s had to change, in part, to a lighter elemental composition in order to ride out and survive the initiation of a new universe cycle.
Whether this involved selectively using electrogravity to simply remove heavy elements, or a more complex genetic strategy, I can’t say.
* Later, at various junctures hyperversal aliens indicated that the huge, orb-like UFO’s with darkened centers that swarm around the US space shuttle in Canadian public television engineer Martyn Stubbs’ copy of NASA video (showing part of the shuttle tether experiment) are hyperversal aliens’ craft making a deliberate, visual appearance for human eyes.
The –X3’s and the -Xn‘s both defer to, and appear to interact with, a larger host of other hyperversal populations. Indeed, some of the other hyperversals are so advanced that they challenge one’s notion of possibilities.
For example, one (or more) of them later demonstrated an ability to literally pose what would happen, or would have happened were a human (myself, in this case) to have chosen unwisely/unecologically at a given moment. In a literally awesome display, the hyperversal (not a -X3, by the way) drew upon a variety of time horizons, of sorts, to quickly elucidate various outcomes that would happen to me were a variety of bad choices made.
The strange part
of the demonstration was that it appeared to bend time around, to
reach both back and forward in time, in order to
do so - across a multiplicity of actual “event horizons.” No
federation alien has demonstrated such a capability, to my
Perhaps you, the reader, have witnessed extraordinarily intelligent manifestations of hyperversal consciousness communicating sentient implications of right and wrong, good ecology and analysis vs. bad. The reason you may have witnessed such is that hyperversals can both ghost, and see through, the activities of lesser aliens. They can do so without leaving much trace. Their capabilities leave one thinking that the old notion of physical limits is a most specious pretension.
We all inter-dimension, apparently, hence many our old 20th century conventions
are drastically inadequate.
I countered that Verdant-related Biderman-DuPonts were among the worst of same, to begin with (this is widely, specifically known off-world, hence I wasn’t dropping a new idea into the mix).
Later –X3 allowed that the Verdants
could be wrong in their strategy, of course. At the time, I was
looking for diversity of origin and outlook among the –X3’s after
various other hyperversals’ critiques had been noted, which was
encouraging. –X3 argued that the grays played a vital role in
introducing humans to advanced concepts, collective considerations
and genetic/nonsexual considerations, etc. I countered that our
non-destructive, non-colonizing, non planet-killing neighbors may do
that better - without mobbing up the situation in self-interested,
argued the concept of basic, universal law (laws common to all
societies) with specific adjustments, allowing for evolution and regeneration in certain cases. In reply, –X3 tended
toward generality and bland remarks that we
would ultimately arrive at collective reckonings, anyway. –X3 also
said we don’t need to kill grays (for whom –X3’s
have some liabilities), that, instead, we can prevail through
informed awareness (this was stated with emphasis).
This was an important, if
not epochal, point. –X3 was thus posed as having
assumed that the Verdant scheme would foul our collective
large-scale convention, disallowing our large-scale
capability and preventing us from returning to existence via the
next universal cycle (to be effected at some future
Later, one alien associated with the –X3’s asked (re the Verdants):
This kind of
thinking assumes, de facto, that mega-populations (like the
have some common characteristics. Basic issues
surrounding mega-populations will be discussed in a later chapter.
Other hyperversals attending to the exchange noted that by using a
hybrid intermediary (who seems to have some
human characteristics), the –X3’s had previously argued that any use
of electrogravity here by recently evolved
aliens, took away from –X3’s system’s vital duration, dimming the
minds/lifetimes of their progeny by shortening the
duration of their calculated cycle. The individual was trying to
argue that excess use of electrogravity would endanger the
sensitivities of yet more-advanced hyperversals.
next night, this opened up a remarkably coherent
human-community consideration of the subject.
In other words, are we all lumped into
the undesirable category?
In this regard, some of the –X3’s appear to be vulnerable to, and can be held to, basic honesty.
We all agreed that life must be shared and respected,
but the –X3 premise and their Verdant links
throw a cruel and calculated bone into our situation. I would be
remiss if I didn’t note that the –X3’s are apparently
but one group within a much larger, interacting variety of
hyperversals. There is highly thoughtful diversity among hyperversals.
In response, –X3 says the –X3’s are more consistent than that. The question is open to further consideration, but the competing hyperversal’s report about the “more capable” and “return to” assumption lingers. In other words, among some hyperversals is there a kind of bias against this universe cycle’s recently evolved aliens?
–X3 may not
be able to see the present, all-of-time
implications of indirectly propagating Verdant crimes while not
exposing them, not organizing a better collective
present, the Verdants seem to have reached
their own sustainable limit, yet they continue to reproduce sexually
and intrude upon, then deprive numerous lesser
populations of resources. The Verdant case, coupled with the –X3’s
compromised posture, suggests that in this part
of the Virgo supercluster the –X3’s may not be as effective as they
may be elsewhere. The inference owes to the
predatory habits and sheer, inflated greed of the Verdant
In other words, humans are caught within a kind of fail-safe duality:
Apparently, more advanced populations don’t leave much room for upstart primitives to propagate outward.
aired by a competing alien at this juncture was
that the –X3’s consider all current cycle aliens as primitive, if
not dangerously undesirable, hence their prototypical
treatment of humans as a people.
Note: several months ago, one of the –Xn’s stated that, due to the nature of the interactions to which I am party, at least “30,000” humans and others “have to” keep track of the interactions, to some extent. Given the fact that such interactions stand out in semi-public profile, due to ongoing alien inputs, I’m not surprised to hear such a number.
In years past, had I foreseen what is now happening here and elsewhere on the globe, I would have marveled at both the events, and the order, the humble clarity with which they have occurred, the absence of weirdly backward human interlocutors.
Instead, I encouraged others to pick
up in terms of the best and most advanced of all
contemporary aliens (anywhere), to try as best we can to not go
back, thereafter. Apparently, the lessons of other
kinds aren’t lost on us because transformations of the sort
profoundly change the thoughts of humans who communicate such
understandings to others.
This was demonstrated through amplification of an electrogravity field inside my own head, while a friendly, non-federation alien commented on the process, saying that the grays escaped by psychotronically coordinating an energy weapon activated from outside, not by simply using their thought waves. I felt sharp pain due to sudden pressure pushing outward from within all of my brain structure.
On another occasion, what appeared to be a –X3 hybrid (or a related alien) used electrogravity to put a kind of Dt freeze on my liver function, causing mild pain there for days, after I’d mentioned that the Verdant strategy toward Earth smacked of “a war-like tactic.” I was advised to discontinue remote probing of the Verdants’ main ship while a “potentially lethal” use of energy was being directed toward me.
I held off for about 10 days.
(* I should note that, at the time, I was smack in the middle of
sharply worded, direct exposures of Verdant doings here, which
proved extremely embarrassing for them - exposures partly informed by
This has been stated over and over again by hyperversals. So, hyperversals probably trade with lesser empires/collectives like that of the Verdants.
This poses a risk to humans, in that, should we fail, our
system could conceivably be cannibalized by both Verdants and hyperversals, i.e. Verdants taking nearby planets where
they have reportedly stationed their
enclaves, or the –X3’s using other relic aspects of our system. To
some this may seem a far-fetched assertion, yet
aliens have repeatedly stated that a biological beauty like Earth is
rare and coveted.
For example, do the –X3’s distance themselves from evolving populations like ours in order to avoid being asked for direct help in cases of conflict?
If such were the case, they wouldn’t have to concern themselves with posing actual, physical aid to lesser populations. Hyperversals would be reluctant to do so, as is consistent with their plan to cultivate responsibility among younger populations, plus their need to veil as much of their technology and capacities from the greedy hands of other aliens like the Verdants.
On other occasions, I’ve noted –X3’s acting with a kind of “fill factor” presumption: the mistaken notion that they can scan out all of the intelligent implications in the space-time surrounding a situation like that of Earth.
This can cause a –X3 to lapse into self-centered, singular misconception, as though he/she occupies or is equal to all that he/she can access. In other words, a hyperversal can confuse his or her awareness of the universe (inherently limited), with the larger universe, itself. It’s an easy mistake to make.
There’s an illusory quality to
time that humans are only beginning to understand, basic questions
about the limits of a larger kind of out-of-body
awareness. There are subtle event horizons in time that can easily deceive one.
As one –Xn critic of the –X3’s noted, some of the –X3’s more distressing shortcomings can be attributed to their basic “biology,” their animal origins.
One coldly calculating
security section affiliated with the –X3’s sometimes hews
so closely to the Verdant routine that I must re-examine a given
interaction to sort out which group was trying to
stump humans and cause them to lapse into low-order, concretized
notions of life: the security section, or the Verdants?
* About 18 months after I first learned about hyperversals, a –Xn hyperversal stated that one apparent leader in the given hyperversal security section is from a larger elliptical galaxy.
At various junctures there had been cryptic indications that hyperversals either living in or tasked to the large elliptical galaxy Centaurus A (neighboring the Verdants) were among this security section. I had noted the one leader, in particular, on numerous occasions.
The –Xn hyperversal further stated that the given (security section) hyperversal had essentially been “in his retirement garden” when a disturbance occurred that threatened the planned stability of his (either home or assigned) galaxy.
In other words, the security-tasked hyperversal who appears surrounding the Verdants may have had mixed sentiments about how Verdants were later steered outward into other galaxies.
* I’ll refer to this
(presumably Centaurus A) hyperversal and his security section in