|
by Jon Rappoport
January 28-29, 2016
from
JonRappoport Website
Spanish version
Is the Dreaded Zika Virus Another
Giant Scam?
January 28, 2016
Hysteria sells and…
It's hysteria time again. Let me run it
down for you.
This is the word:
The
dreaded Zika virus! Watch out! It's carried by mosquitoes! It can
cause birth defects - babies are born with very small heads and
impaired brains!
Here are a few scare headlines that were
running
on Drudge as of 1/26:
"Brazil sends 200,000 soldiers to stop spread of Zika."
"Stay away from Rio if you're pregnant."
"'Losing battle' against mosquito."
"Virus threatening two continents."
Want more hysteria...?
The Daily Mail indicates pregnant women
are being warned not to travel to 22 countries in Latin America and
Africa.
Several Zika cases are being reported in,
Then we have this from the Washington
Post ("As
Zika virus spreads, El Salvador asks women not to get pregnant until
2018," 1/22/2016):
"The rapid spread of the Zika virus
has prompted Latin American governments to urge women
not to get pregnant for up to two
years, an extraordinary precaution aimed at avoiding birth
defects believed to be linked to the mosquito-borne illness.
"…a
potentially culture-shaping phenomenon in which the populations
of several nations have been asked to delay procreation.
The World Health Organization says at least 20 countries or
territories in the region, including Barbados and Bolivia,
Guadeloupe and Guatemala, Puerto Rico and Panama, have
registered transmission of the virus."
So we now have governments warning women
not to get pregnant.
A new form
of depopulation.
Don't get pregnant...
If you do, and a mosquito bites you, you
could give birth to a severely damaged child. Not only that, we have
massive advisories against travel, for pregnant women. And 200,000
soldiers in Brazil, the site of the upcoming Olympics, are going
door to door and distributing information about this new "plague."
Are the soldiers also telling men and women not to have sex? Who
knows?
So let's take a little side trip to Scam
City and examine the science behind the Zika virus and the assertion
that it is causing birth defects.
Before a virus can be said to cause
disease, a few procedures need to occur:
-
First, the virus must be
proved to exist. It has to be isolated from a human carrier as
diseased tissue, and then that tissue has to be put under an
electron microscope, where many, many (Zika) viruses can be seen.
-
Second, tests have to be run on many suspected human cases, and
these tests have to reveal very large amounts of Zika in the body.
That's your basic starter kit for deciding that a virus might be
causing actual human disease.
In examining the published literature on
Zika, so far I see no reports of diseased-tissue removal from a
human, followed by electron microscope photos revealing large
amounts of Zika.
As far as diagnostic tests on suspected
human cases are concerned, I see, as usual, two major types of
testing:
I'll briefly review
the egregious flaws in these tests.
Antibodies are immune-system scouts
which identify invaders in the body.
- The antibodies ID these
villains so other elements of the immune system can repel and
destroy them. When a test shows that antibodies geared to a specific
virus/villain (like Zika) are present in the body, it means the body
has contacted that Zika virus - if the test was done well and didn't
come up with a falsely-positive result.
False positives are
frequent. But more disastrously,
proving the body had contact with a specific virus says absolutely
nothing about whether the patient is sick or will get sick.
In fact, before 1985, a positive antibody test was generally taken
to be a good sign: the body's immune system had encountered and
overcome the invader. After 1985, the "science" was turned upside
down: a positive test meant the person was sick or going to get
sick. And that meant, of course, more (false) diagnoses of disease
and more profit from treatments.
In announced "epidemics," health
agencies can falsely inflate the numbers of cases to the moon.
- The PCR is a very sophisticated and
tricky test to run. It is prone to errors. It takes a tiny, tiny
amount of material assumed to be a fragment of a virus, and it
amplifies (blows up) that fragment so it can be observed.
The first
problem with the test is:
The second problem is:
The test,
despite claims to the contrary, says nothing reliable about the amount of virus (like Zika) that is in the patient's body. Why
is this important? Because you need a great deal of virus in the
body to begin to say it is causing disease. A very small amount is
trivial.
With these two useless tests in tow -
the antibody and the PCR - researchers and doctors don't have a
meaningful clue about whether a patient is ill as a result of Zika
infection.
All case-number reports are suspect, to say the very
least.
Therefore, attributing very serious
problems to Zika on a worldwide basis is insupportable and
speculative. It isn't science. And to make the leap to claiming the
virus is causing pregnant women to give birth to babies with very
small heads and impaired brains is absurd.
Who benefits from this Zika "science"?
Certainly, the people who are releasing
genetically engineered (GE)
mosquitoes as a form of disease-prevention. The big honcho is a
company named
Oxitec.
So far, the GE mosquitoes are being used to
curtail dengue fever in,
-
Brazil
-
Malaysia
-
the Cayman Islands
Florida is next up on the
agenda...:
But with Zika coming on
strong in the press as a "mosquito-carried plague," how long will it
be before special bugs are modified to save the planet from this new
threat…
Just a few problems with the GE
mosquitoes, though.
A town in Brazil has reported continuing
elevated levels of dengue fever since the GE (genetically
engineered) mosquitoes have been introduced to combat that disease.
The scientific hypothesis is:
the
trickster GE bugs (males) will impregnate natural females, but no
actual next generation will occur beyond the larval stage.
However, this plummeting birth rate in
mosquitoes is the only "proof" that the grand experiment is safe.
No
long-term health studies have been done - this is a mirror of what
happened when GMO crops were introduced: no science, just bland
assurances.
Needless to say, without extensive lab
testing, there is no way to tell what these GE mosquitoes are
actually harboring, in addition to what researchers claim. That's a
major red flag.
Wherever these GE mosquitoes have been
introduced, or are about to be introduced, the human populations
have not been consulted for their permission. It's all being done by
government and corporate edict.
It's human experimentation
on a
grand scale...
There are concerns that, if indeed the
dengue-carrying mosquitoes are actually wiped out, the vacuum may be
filled by another dengue carrier, the Asian Tiger Mosquito - which
breeds much faster.
Other than that, everything is perfect.
Let's have a big parade and welcome genetically-engineered
mosquitoes to planet Earth.
Back to the Zika virus:
what actually is causing mothers to
give birth to babies with very small heads and impaired brains?
If this is indeed a fairly recent
phenomenon, I would start with a deep and very specific
investigation of the genetically engineered mosquitoes that were
recently released in Brazil to decimate the dengue-fever mosquitoes.
Then I would pay attention to a report
like this (Rio Times, 5/5/15,
"Brazil Shown to Be Largest Global Consumer of Pesticides"):
"The use of pesticides in Brazil
grew by more than 162 percent from 2000 to 2012, according to
the latest report by the Brazilian Association of Collective
Health (ABRASCO), making the country the number one consumer of
pesticides in the world.
According to the entity, the Brazilian
agriculture sector purchased more than 823,000 tons of
pesticides in 2012."
"The ABRASCO report, titled 'An Alert of the Impacts of Pesticides on Health',
was released last week in Rio de Janeiro. The report includes
scientific studies including data from the National Cancer
Institute that shows a direct link between the use of pesticides
and health problems."
A quote inside the report:
"Not only are we using more
[pesticides] but we are using more powerful, stronger
pesticides. We have been forced to import pesticides which were
not even allowed in Brazil to combat pests which attacked GM
soybean and cotton plants…"
"…22 of the fifty main active
ingredients used in pesticides in Brazil today have been banned
in most other countries. "
How about an in-depth investigation, on
the ground, probing the connection between these pesticides and
birth defects?
Or is it better, for the chosen few, to
use a virus as a false cover story, in order to explain away
horrendous damage from what amounts to chemical warfare?
***
Try this study, published in
Environmental Health Perspectives on July 1, 2011: "Urinary
Biomarkers of Prenatal Atrazine Exposure..."
Here is a quote referring to what is now
being called a prime Zika effect:
"The presence versus absence of quantifiable
levels of [the pesticide] atrazine or a specific atrazine
metabolite was associated with fetal growth restriction… and
small head circumference…
Head circumference was also inversely
associated with the presence of the herbicide metolachlor."
Getting the picture?
Of course, both
Atrazine and
metolachlor
pesticides are used in Brazil. Why is this connection to birth
defects being overlooked? If this is still a serious question, in
this day and age, and if the answers aren't obvious, the questioner
just arrived from Pluto.
I have walked the path of
making these connections since 1987. The covert-op is
played exactly like the old shell game. Look here, don't look there.
This is important, that means nothing.
Tons and tons and tons of various
pesticides and other poisonous chemicals… but forget that, it's all
because of a virus.
"A virus" is the best false cover story
ever invented.
Zika Freakout - The Hoax and the
Covert-Op Continue
January 29, 2016
If you want to hide anything on this
planet, twist it into a (fake) story about a virus. You're home
free.
This is my second article on the Zika-virus
scam (above, is first one).
I've been to these rodeos before:
-
HIV
-
West Nile
-
Swine Flu
-
SARS
-
Ebola
In each case, a virus is blamed for illness and
death that actually arises from other causes.
The Zika virus, now being blamed for the
birth of babies with very small heads and impaired brains, has been
around for a long time - late 1940s, early 1950s - and suddenly,
without warning or reason, after inducing, at best, mild illness,
it's producing horrendous damage?
This is called a clue.
A clue that
scientific liars are lying. Furthermore, many of the women who are
giving birth to deformed babies test negative for the presence of
the Zika Virus. So, what is causing babies to be
born with very small heads and brain damage?
While researching my first book in
1987-8,
AIDS INC., I concluded:
don't assume there is only one cause for illness.
That can be very misleading. Various factors can combine to
produce disease and death.
For example, in the case of this "Zika"
phenomenon:
One:
Pesticide use in Brazil
Brazil, the center of the "Zika"
crisis, uses more pesticides than any nation in the world. Some
of these are banned in 22 other countries.
And as for babies born with smaller
heads, here is a study from Environmental Health Perspectives
(July 1, 2011),
"Urinary Biomarkers of Prenatal Atrazine Exposure...":
"The presence versus absence of quantifiable
levels of [the pesticide] atrazine or a specific atrazine
metabolite was associated with fetal growth restriction… and
small head circumference…
Head
circumference was also inversely associated with the
presence of the herbicide metolachlor."
Atrazine and metolachlor are both
used in Brazil.
Two: The
TdaP vaccine
This is a case of suspicious
correlation.
A study posted in the US National Library of
Medicine, "Pertussis in young infants
- A severe vaccine-preventable
disease," spells it out:
"…in late 2014, the [Brazilian] Ministry of Health announced
the introduction of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women
in Brazil."
Obviously, pregnant women are the
target group; they are giving birth to babies with smaller heads
and brain damage, and the recommendation for them to take the
vaccine was recent; 2014.
Barbara Loe Fisher, of the
National Vaccine
Information Center, writes:
"Drug companies did not test the safety and
effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to
pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S
and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other
biological responses to these vaccines that could affect
pregnancy and birth outcomes…
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) lists influenza and Tdap vaccines as
either Pregnancy Category B or C biologicals which means
that adequate testing has not been done in humans to
demonstrate safety for pregnant women and it is not known
whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect
reproduction capacity.
The
manufacturers of influenza and Tdap vaccines state that
human toxicity and fertility studies are inadequate and warn
that the influenza and Tdap vaccines should 'be given to a
pregnant woman only if clearly needed'."
Three:
Genetically engineered mosquitoes that have already been
released in Brazil to "combat" dengue fever
- A project
implemented by Oxitec, a company supplied with grant money from
Bill Gates -
A town in Brazil has reported
continuing elevated levels of dengue fever since the GE
(genetically engineered) mosquitoes have been introduced to
combat that disease.
The scientific hypothesis is: the
trickster GE bugs (males) will impregnate natural females, but
no actual next generation will occur beyond the larval stage.
However, this plummeting birth rate in mosquitoes is the only
"proof" that the grand experiment is safe.
No long-term health
studies have been done - this is a mirror of what happened when GMO crops were introduced: no science, just bland assurances.
Needless to say, without extensive
lab testing, there is no way to tell what toxic elements these
GE mosquitoes may actually be harboring, in addition to what
researchers claim. That's a major red flag.
Wherever these GE mosquitoes have
been introduced, or are about to be introduced, the human
populations have not been consulted for their permission.
It's
all being done by government and corporate edict. It's human
experimentation on a grand scale.
Four:
Pesticide manufacturing in Brazil
Reuters, May 19, 2015,
"Brazil prosecutors seek $16 million from pesticide makers":
"Brazilian prosecutors said on Monday they
would seek at least 50 million reais ($16.6 million) from
multinational pesticide manufacturers for alleged safety
violations at a collection facility for used pesticide
containers…
Those manufacturers, prosecutors said, include
the Brazilian units of,
The charges come as
scientists, regulators, public health officials and
consumers increasingly complain that Brazil's ascent as an
agricultural powerhouse has led to unsafe and excessive use
of pesticides.
Reuters reported in April that
at least four foreign
manufacturers sell pesticides in Brazil that they are not
allowed to sell in their home markets."
How convenient for these corporate
giants to evade blame for horrific birth effects - out of
nowhere a virus is touted as the cause.
Five:
Severe and endemic malnutrition, lack of basic sanitation, and
grinding poverty
These are major factors in all
illness and death, in the areas where they are prevalent (e.g.,
major parts of Brazil).
Suppression of the immune system is the
result, and anything that then comes down the pipeline, germs or
manmade toxic substances, become catastrophic to the body.
Six:
Anti-mosquito sprays
The Guardian, January 26, 2015,
"Brazil is
'badly losing' the battle against Zika virus, says
health minister":
Sprays are now being given out
to 400,000 pregnant women in Brazil.
Naturally, the sprays
are toxic. What better way to multiply the attack on mothers
and their unborn children? For example, widely used
organophosphates in sprays can be highly disruptive to the
nervous system.
Some or all of these six elements I've
listed, in combination, form a sustained attack on human life.
And as I keep stressing,
the virus becomes the formidable cover story that conceals the truth.
And don't forget the Rio Olympic Games,
coming up in August. There are multiple scenarios which could play
out in front of a global television audience.
Every fake epidemic is, in part,
designed to create fear and induce blind compliance to medical and
government dictates. The germ is positioned as the "tiny terrorist"
in this stage play.
In my first book, AIDS INC.
(1988), I indicated that covert medical ops are the most dangerous,
because they appear to be politically neutral, they fly under no
flag, and they claim to forward only humanitarian aims.
But in fact,
modern "Rockefeller Medicine" is built as a vast partner in
the
Globalization of the planet.
Its vision is a universal in-utero-to-cradle-to-grave
system for the human race:
every human walks a bleak lifelong path
of disease-diagnosis after diagnosis, receiving toxic drugs and
vaccines at every turn, which weaken his body and mind, and make him
unable to consider what is happening outside his perimeter of
suffering or resist political totalitarianism.
Medical freedom means:
the freedom to
refuse medical care, and it's based on knowledge of destructive
effects.
This freedom must win, against any odds.
"Official science" is a
contradiction in terms, and a grand illusion...
|
