|
by Patrick Delaney
April 07,
2021
from
LifeSiteNews Website
Dr. Mike Yeadon
Source
"Look out the
window, and think,
'why is my
government lying to me
about something
so fundamental...?'"
Dr.
Michael Yeadon,
Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy &
Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new
medicines research and retired from
the pharmaceutical giant with "the most senior research position" in
his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews in a telephone interview.
He addressed the "demonstrably false" propaganda from governments in
response to COVID-19, including the "lie" of dangerous variants, the
totalitarian potential for "vaccine passports," and the strong
possibility we are dealing with a "conspiracy" which could lead to
something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and
massacres of the 20th century.
His main points included:
-
There is "no
possibility" current variants of COVID-19 will escape
immunity. It is "just a lie."
-
Yet, governments
around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we
are witnessing not just "convergent opportunism," but a
"conspiracy." Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms
are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of
the truth.
-
Pharmaceutical
companies have already begun to develop unneeded "top-up"
("booster") vaccines for the "variants." The companies are
planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to
the current experimental
COVID-19 "vaccine"
campaign.
-
Regulatory
agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the
European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these
"top-up" vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections
which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug
companies will not be required to "perform any clinical
safety studies."
-
Thus, this
virtually means that design and implementation of repeated
and coerced mRNA vaccines "go from the computer screen of a
pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions
of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for
which there is absolutely no need or justification."
-
Why are they
doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of
vaccine passports along with a "banking reset" could issue
in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen.
Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, "mass
depopulation" remains a logical outcome.
-
The fact that
this at least could be true means everyone must "fight like
crazy to make sure that system never forms."
Dr. Yeadon began
identifying himself as merely a "boring guy" who went,
"to work for a big
drug company... listening to the main national broadcast and
reading the broad sheet newspapers."
Continuing, he said:
"But in the last year
I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in
the faces of the British people about everything to do with
this coronavirus. Absolutely
everything...
It's a fallacy this
idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don't have
symptoms, but you are a source of a virus.
That
lockdowns 'work',
that
masks have a 'protective value'
obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary
things and we even need to close international borders in case
some of these nasty foreign variants get in.
"Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based
vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some
'top-up' vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.
"Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is
demonstrably false.
But our entire
national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but
they are all wrong."
'Conspiracy' and not
just 'convergent opportunism'
"But what I would
like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that's
probably going to be the end game for this whole event, which I
think is probably a conspiracy.
Last year I thought
it was what I called 'convergent opportunism,' that is a bunch
of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a
world in chaos to push us in a particular direction.
So it looked like it
was kind of linked, but I was prepared to say it was just
convergence."
"I [now] think that's naïve.
There is no question
in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world
have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or
created the pandemic.
One of those two
things is true because the reason it must be true is that
dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same
lies and doing the same inefficacious things
that demonstrably cost lives.
"And they are talking the same sort of future script which is,
'We don't want
you to move around because of these pesky varmints, these
'variants' - which I call 'samiants' by the way, because
they are pretty much the same - but they're all saying this
and they are all saying 'don't worry, there will be 'top-up'
vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.'
They're all saying
this when it is obviously nonsense."
Possible end
game - Vaccine 'passports' tied to spending allowances, thorough
control
"I think the end game
is going to be, 'everyone receives a vaccine'… Everyone on the
planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite
mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.
"When they do that every single individual on the planet will
have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which
will be 'vaccinated,' or not... and whoever possesses that, sort
of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to
control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either
cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular
transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that
one human population database decide.
And I think that's
what this is all about because once you've got that, we become
playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that
database want it.
"For example,
you might find that after a banking reset that you can only
spend through using an app that actually feeds off this
[database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag."
"And, yes,
certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious
use for these
vaccine passports, as they are called, but I've heard talk
of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into
public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they
wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the
future without the appropriate privilege on your app.
"But even if
that's not [the] true [intent of the vaccine campaign], it
doesn't matter, the fact that it
could be true means everyone [reading] this should
fight like crazy to make sure
that [vaccine passport] system never forms."
"[With such a
system], here is an example of what they could make you do, and
I think this is what they're going to make [people] do.
"You could
invent a story that is about a virus and its variations, its
mutations over time.
You could
invent the story and make sure you embed it through the captive
media, make sure that no one can counter it by censoring
alternative sources, then people are now familiar with this idea
that this virus mutates, which it does, and that it produces
variants, which is true [as well], which could
escape your immune system,
and that's a lie.
"But,
nevertheless, we're going to tell you it's true, and then when
we tell you that it's true and we say 'but we've got the cure,
here's a top-up vaccine,' you'll get a message, based on this
one global, this one ID system:
'Bing!' it
will come up and say 'Dr. Yeadon, time for your top-up
vaccine. And, by the way,' it will say 'your existing immune
privileges remain valid for four weeks.
But if you
don't get your top-up vaccine in that time, you will
unfortunately detrimentally be an "out person," and you
don't want that, do you?'
So, that's how
it'll work, and people will just walk up and they'll get their
'top-up'
vaccine."
Gov't lies, Big Pharma
moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible
'mass-depopulation'
"But I will
take you through this, Patrick, because I am qualified to
comment.
I don't know
what
Vanden Bossche is about. There was no possibility at all,
based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000
or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e.
become more 'dangerous'].
"Nevertheless,
politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are
saying that they are. They're lying. Well, why would you do
that?
"Here's the
other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said,
several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our
gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development,
and we can help you.
"And here's the
real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration]
FDA, the Japanese medicines agency, the
European Medicines Agency, have gotten together and
announced... since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar
to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use
authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to
perform any clinical safety studies.
"So, you've got
on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying
to you that variants are different enough from the current virus
that, even if you're immune from natural exposure or
vaccination, you're a risk and you need to come and get this
top-up vaccine.
So, I think
neither of those are true. So why is the
drug company making the top-up vaccines?
And [with] the
regulators having got out of the way - and if Yeadon is right,
and I'm sure I am or I wouldn't be telling you this -
you go from the computer screen
of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of
millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which
there is absolutely no need or justification.
"And if you
wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and
could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say 'let's put
it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month
period,' or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you
encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible].
Biotechnology provides you with,
limitless ways, frankly, to injure or
kill billions of people...
"And since I
can't think of a benign explanation for any of the steps:
variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies… it's not only
that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps
described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of
resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just
described:
unknown,
and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of
potentially billions of people for no reason.
"I'm very
worried... that pathway will be used for
mass depopulation,
because I can't think of any benign explanation."
'Absurdly impossible'
variants will escape immunity, 'just a lie'
"If I can show
you that one major thing that governments around the world are
telling the people is a lie, you should take my 32 years of
experienced opinion that says, most of it, if not all of it, is
a lie."
"The most
different variant is only 0.3% different from the original
sequence as emailed out of Wuhan in... January 2020.
0.3% [is] the
one [variant] that is the most
different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it
is,
'all of the variants are not less than
99.7% identical to
each other.'
"Now, you might
be thinking, 'hmm, 0.3%, is that enough [to escape immunity and
become more dangerous]?' The answer is
no. Get away, ya know, get
out of here...
"The human
immune system is a thing of wonder.
What it does is
when it faces a new pathogen like this, you've got
professional cells, they're called
professional antigen-presenting cells - they're kind of
rough tough things that tend not to succumb to viruses.
And their job
is to grab foreign things in the near environment and tear them
limb from limb [inside the cell]. They really cut them up into
hundreds of pieces.
And then they
present these pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits
of your immune system, and amazingly, because of the variability
that nature gave you, huge variability to recognize foreign
things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20 different specific
motifs that it spots about this virus.
They're called
epitopes,
basically they're just like little photographs of the details
about this virus.
That's what
they do. And that is what is called your repertoire, your immune
repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups,
of different bits of this virus.
"Now, if a tiny
piece of the virus changes, like the .3% I've just described, if
you are re-infected by that variant, your professional cells tear
into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and
lo and behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and
recognized, are still there in the variants.
"There is absolutely no chance
that all of them will fail to be recognized and that is what is
required for immune escape, to escape your immunity.
It must present to you as a new pathogen.
It must be
sufficiently different that, when it is cut up by your
professional checker cells, it won't find mostly the same thing
it has seen before. And that is
just absurdly impossible when you have only varied .3%, so it is
99.7% (similar).
"You can go and
check that by looking at papers by a person called
Alison
Tarke. There is also
Shane Crotty, and all of the other co-authors.
"And before
them, coming from my theoretical understanding of multi-locus
immunity, which is what I just badly tried to describe, to what
actually happens... If your [immune system] is presented with
something that contains even half of those similar pieces, there
is no way your body will say, 'that's a new pathogen.'
"And, so, the idea that 0.3% could
even have a chance of getting around immunity is just a lie.
It's not [even] like an opinion difference.
"I don't think
3% would be enough. That's 10 times more variation than has
occurred in 16 months [with this virus]. I don't even think 30%
difference would be enough.
So, I'm saying
that 100 times more variation than has actually happened, would
still leave me putting a big bet
on the human immune system not being fooled that these are new
pathogens.
"I've chatted
this over with several professors of immunology and they agreed
with me, it's like, 'why are you asking me this?'
"So, I think
that what I've just said is that governments and their advisors
in multiple countries are lying about variants. That's a massive
thing! You should check it out. Your readers should check it
out. If it's true, don't you think it's terrifying?! It was when
I realized it.
"So, they're
lying about variants, and then, of course, since [the variants]
are not really different, you do not need a 'top-up' vaccine.
Now you should be getting the
hairs on the back of your neck up, because they are
making them right now!"
"They are
making
billions of vials of it. And they will be available by the
end of the year.
"And I think
they'll require people to first, be on the vaccine passport
one-world database, and then it will roll up into the top-ups,
and if it takes a bit longer it will take a bit longer.
"But this is
not going away. It won't go away until enough people, if they
ever do, say 'you're a bunch of frauds and we are taking our
freedoms back, so you can just stop doing this.'
"Because one
person shouting into the wilderness and all of the other
academics looking the other way, will have us just going down
this pipe maybe a week later than if I hadn't said anything, but
we're still going down to
hell.
"So, that's why
I'm frightened.
"The variants
aren't different. I call them 'samiants'… they're pretty much
the same. They're not different.
Therefore, you
don't need a top-up vaccine, so don't go near any of them."
'Why is my government
lying to me?' - Because 'they are going to kill you'
"[And if you
recognize that our governments are involved in a major
verifiable lie], don't just turn your computer off and go to
supper.
Stop...
Look out the
window, and think,
'why is my
government lying to me about something so fundamental?'
Because, I
think the answer is, they are
going to kill you using this method. They're going to kill you
and your family.
"The
eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a
really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some
unspecified thing that will damage you.
I have no idea
what it will actually be, but it won't be a vaccine because you
don't need one. And it won't kill you on the end of the needle
because you would spot that.
"It could be
something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at
various times between vaccination and the event, it will be
plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on
in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise,
or that of your children will look normal.
"That's what I
would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world's
population. And I think that's what they're doing."
"Now I don't
know [for certain] that they're going to use that [system] to
kill you, but I can't think of a benign reason, and with that
power they certainly could harm you, or control you, so you
should object [and strenuously oppose it]."
People can't deal with
this level of evil, but Soviets, Hitler, Mao show its possibility
"It's become
absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people,
friends, acquaintances... and they can tell I'm telling them
something important, but they get to the point [where I say],
'your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to
your death and that of your children,' and they can't begin to
engage with it.
And I think
maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank
their understanding of it because it is too difficult.
And my concern
is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with
the possibility that anyone is so evil…
"But I remind
you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century,
what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know,
Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war
era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on.
"We've only got
to look back two or three generations. All around us there are
people who are as bad as the people doing this. They're all
around us.
So, I say to
folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its
scale.
"But actually,
this is probably less bloody, it's less personal, isn't it? The
people who are steering this... it's going to be much easier for
them.
They don't have
to shoot anyone in the face. They don't have to beat someone to
death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make
them work until they die.
All of those
things did happen two or three generations back and our
grandparents or great grandparents were either victims of this,
or they were actually members of it, or at least they witnessed
it from overseas.
That's how
close we are...
"And all I'm
saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now
they are using molecular biology. And the people going along
with it, I think they would probably say,
'I was only following
orders,' which we have heard before...
"But I know,
because I have talked to lots of people, and some of them have
said,
'I don't
want to believe that you are right, so I'm going to just put
it away because if it is true, I can't handle it.'
And I think...
all you need to do is find a good reason to tell people,
'Don't take
the vaccine unless you're a medical risk of dying from the
virus!'
That seems to
me a pretty good line!"
Towards a solution
"I'm a
scientist, and I can tell you, talking to non-scientists, using
science as a tool, will not work. It will fail...
"So, we need
philosophers, people who understand logic, something
like that, [they have] to wrestle with this, and start
talking in a language people will understand.
Because if we
leave it with scientists, people like me, even though I'm
well-intentioned, I'm a gabbling alien as far as most people in
the street are concerned.
They won't
believe the government will lie to them, they don't believe the
government would ever do anything that will harm them, but they
are [doing such things]"...
| 
