|
May 18, 2021 from HealthImpactNews Website
But the reason this video
clip of his presentation is circulating through the Internet today,
is because of what he said over 25 years ago about
Anthony Fauci, and others at
the National Institute of Health (NIH) at that time.
that is more than what the President of the United States draws, and he obviously has more power over public health policy than any U.S. President ever has.
We printed many articles on Anthony Fauci in 2020, and in case anyone wants to accuse me of exaggerating, let's do a review of some of the crimes Anthony Fauci has been involved in for the past few decades.
We published an article
in May of 2015 highlighting this horrible practice that is legal in
the U.S. See:
Medical Kidnapping in the U.S. - Kidnapping Children for Drug Trials
Source
In a 2011 article in the Journal Pediatrics, researchers discussed the problem of recruiting children for participation in clinical trials for drug testing.
Researchers from Ohio
State University (Columbus) and Case Western Reserve University,
confirm that the US federal government is mandating that children be
included in clinical research studies.
In 2005, a hearing with the title "Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials" was held by the U.S. House of Representatives.
The Subcommittee on Human
Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, investigated whether
adequate safeguards were in place to protect foster children from
being forced to participate in drug studies.
The same group of people
who have been involved
in HIV/AIDS research to develop an HIV
vaccine, a vaccine which has never come to market, are the same
group of people now working with the U.S. Government to develop a COVID vaccine.
Faith Dyson recently published an article on Facebook titled What was Fauci's Role in Funding Tuskgegee-Like AIDS Experiments on Foster Children in Seven U.S. States?
She relies heavily on the work of investigative journalist Liam Scheff, and his research published in the book, The House That AIDS Built, which can be found online here.
Phil Crane, right, meets with President George W. Bush and Representative Bill Thomas of Committee on Ways and Means.
As we found out in our own investigative report back in 2015, Congress knew about these medical experiments being conducted on foster children and conducted a hearing in 2005, with the title "Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials."
The transcript of these hearings used to be on the House.gov website, but since we published our article it has been removed. A copy can be found at Archives.org here.
Liam Scheff details what some of these foster children went through in his book.
Does the issue of "inaccurate tests" sound familiar?
It should, because we are seeing the exact same thing today with COVID tests.
Faith Dyson writes about her reaction after reading Liam Scheff's reports:
Read the entire article by Faith Dyson here.
Judicial Watch Sues the FDA to Obtain Records on Purchases of "Fresh and Never Frozen" Fetus Parts for HIV/AIDS Research
Last year we published an interview between Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Theresa Deisher regarding the use of human fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines.
Most of the COVID vaccines being developed are using human fetal tissue to culture the coronavirus.
One of the more interesting questions Mr. Kennedy asked Dr. Deisher was why the manufacturers of vaccines switched from exclusively using animal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines, to start using aborted fetal tissue some years back.
Dr. Deisher's reply was that the industry was getting a lot of pressure from the animal rights movement to stop using animals for experimentation.
Mr. Kennedy was shocked, and stated:
Dr. Deisher replied:
On June 23, 2020, Judicial Watch announced that they had obtained records showing that the FDA paid for "Fresh and Never Frozen" human fetal parts for use in "Humanized Mice" creation in the past for HIV/AIDS research.
On February 13, 2020, Judicial Watch announced:
The Trump Administration put a ban on using aborted human fetal tissue in federally funded research, but during the COVID Plandemic some members of Congress petitioned to get an exemption for COVID-19 research. (Source)
Read the full article here.
Biden's Border Crisis is Worse Than Most People Realize
Today under the Biden administration, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors are crossing the border from Mexico into the United States with no documentation.
All of those children will enter into the Foster Care system, where many of them will be used for drug research, probably for future versions of the new mRNA bioweapons wrongly called "vaccines."
Others will face a far worse fate, either being sexually trafficked or murdered outright for body parts, or to make the drug Adrenochrome. Adrenochrome is blood from young children who produce high levels of adrenalin just before they are murdered, often through Satanic ritual abuse. Learn more about Adrenochrome here, here, and here.
When you look at Anthony Fauci on TV, does he look more like a 60-year-old man, or an 80-year-old man?
He is 80 years old. Does he consume Adrenochrome to stay looking young?
Anthony Fauci - 40 Years of Lies From AZT to Remdesivir
This article was written by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter and published on Off-Guardian.org last year.
Some excerpts:
Because with a current annual budget of almost six billion dollars, Fauci's institute is a giant in AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and autoimmune research - while he himself is perhaps the most powerful man in the global virus circus.
The abundance of lies Fauci puts into the world is so great that you don't even know where to start to enumerate them all. One of the many topic fields he is sending out factually untenable statements to the whole world is without question COVID-19.
In order to become aware of this, one has to realize that:
Thus, Fauci's narratives about the alleged novel coronavirus become downright a fairy tale.
And a fairy tale teller, a modern-day Munchausen "Baron of Lies", Fauci has been since he became the director of the NIAID in 1984 - the year Ronald Reagan was US president and AIDS was put on the world stage.
This was a turning point in modern world history. Since then the virus hunters enjoy god-like status, and this was accomplished by lies and deceit.
Fauci played a decisive role in its creation, and the parallels to the "installation" of COVID-19 are striking.
How Fauci's Falsehoods turned AZT into a "magic bullet"
How could this happen? Not least due to the swine flu disaster in 1976 in which 50 million US citizens were persuaded to get vaccinated, resulting in side effects in 20 percent to 40 percent of recipients, including paralysis and even death, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) came into unsettled political waters at the end of the 1970s.
As a result, the great contemplation began at these two most powerful organizations related to health politics and biomedical science. In fact, Red Cross officer Paul Cumming told the San Francisco Chronicle in 1994 that "the CDC increasingly needed a major epidemic" at the beginning of the 1980s "to justify its existence." And the HIV/AIDS theory was a salvation for American epidemic authorities.
As a result,
Among those who jumped over from cancer research to AIDS research, the best known is Robert Gallo.
And it started with big lies.
The most important one was announced in April 1984 by Gallo, working under Fauci, when he claimed in a press conference that gained worldwide attention that,
NB. Gallo's papers were printed in the journal Science over one week after his press conference and also after he had filed a patent application for an antibody test later misleadingly named "HIV test".
Thus, nobody was able to review his work prior to his spectacular TV appearance, and for some days afterwards.
This presented a severe breach of professional scientific etiquette. And as review later showed Gallo's studies did not deliver any proof for the virus thesis. [1]
Mullis confirmed it as well:
Mullis even had the opportunity do ask Montagnier personally about a reference proving that HIV causes AIDS. But he couldn't name one. "It was damned irritating," as Mullis reported. "If Montagnier didn't know the answer, who the hell did?" Of course, whoever is in possession of a solid peer-reviewed study that proves that HIV causes AIDS may please present it to me or my co-author!
I have searched for such a study by myself, but haven't found it, either. I have also approached Anthony Fauci and his NIAID several times asking them, among other things, to send me such a study showing that HIV is a retrovirus that causes a deadly infection.
Finally, I was told by Hillary Hoffman from the NIAID's News and Science Writing Branch that:
About this practice of refusing to answer questions Horace F. Judson, historian of molecular biology, wrote in his book The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science:
Calling AZT trials "scientifically controlled" is like referring to garbage as "haute cuisine"
Such behavior, which smells of misconduct, runs like a golden thread through Fauci's 36-year history as director of the NIAID.
A particularly blatant example is the approval of azidothymidine - commonly known as AZT - that became the first authorized AIDS medication.
The basis for this was the so-called Fischl study which was published in July 1987 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) - and already then Fauci was in charge of federal AIDS funding.
John Lauritsen, journalist, Harvard analyst and active in the Gay Rights Movement since the 1970s, had viewed the FDA documents on the Fischl study and came to the conclusion that the study was "fraud"; the Swiss newspaper Weltwoche termed the experiment a "gigantic botch-up" and NBC News in New York branded the experiments, conducted across the US, as "seriously flawed."
Even the FDA toxicology analyst Harvey I. Chernov concluded - months before publication of the mentioned pivotal AZT study - in an FDA document obtained under the Freedom Of Information Act by John Lauritsten that:
The Fischl experiments were, in fact, stopped after only four months, after 19 trial subjects in the placebo group (those who did not receive AZT, but rather an inactive placebo) and only one participant from the so-called verum group (those who were officially taking AZT) had died. Through this, according to the AIDS establishment, the efficacy of AZT appeared to be proven.
But the Fischl study was not even worth the paper it was printed on.
Not only was it financed by AZT manufacturer Wellcome (today GlaxoSmithKline), which is clearly a conflict of interest, but it was "clear that Fauci's NIH and the FDA had far too 'cozy' a relationship with Burroughs-Wellcome," as Lauritsen writes.
Apart from that, the study was stopped after only four months.
A clinical trial observation period of only four months is much too short to be informative, considering the usual practice of administering AIDS medications over years, or even a lifetime.
Moreover, the Fischl study had been conducted in a downright fraudulent manner.
For example, the double-blind conditions of the study (according to which neither the researchers nor patients should have known who was taking AZT and who was taking placebos) were no longer existent after a short time.
NBC lead reporter Perri Peltz stated in 1988, that almost immediately everyone knew who was getting what. Patients told how they can distinguish AZT from placebo by the taste.
Furthermore, the FDA documents show that the study results were distorted.
For example, sicker patients were placed in the placebo group or because the group that swallowed AZT (and therefore had to cope with the severe side effects) received more supportive medical services than the placebo subjects.
NBC reported that there was widespread tampering with the rules of the Fischl trial.
The rules had been violated coast to coast, and if all patients with protocol violations were dropped, there wouldn't be enough to be able to continue the study.
Same Old Scam: From AZT to "swine flu" vaccines, PrEP & remdesivir
The list of Fauci's assertions, which he must know he cannot substantiate scientifically, is almost endless.
In the context of so-called "bird flu" (H5N1) which was exaggerated to a world threat by the WHO, politicians, scientists and the mainstream media between 2003 and 2005, Fauci predicted that "even in the best-case scenarios" it would "cause 2 to 7 million deaths" worldwide.
As the journalist Michael Fumento writes in his article:
In fact, even the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that by May 16, 2006, H5N1 had killed "only" 100 people.
Equally unsubstantiated was Fauci's aggressive promotion of H1N1 influenza ("swine flu") vaccine in 2009. Back then he was reassuring that serious adverse events were "very, very, very rare".
Unfortunately, this statement was also irresponsibly unfounded, because the underlying studies were fast-tracked ones and lacked solid double-blind placebo-controls.
There were also heavy conflicts of interests.
To make matters worse, only one year later, in 2010, the Swedish Agency for the Regulation of Prescription Drugs reported cases of children and adolescents suffering from narcolepsy after a swine flu vaccination - a neurological disorder that leads to a disturbance of the circadian rhythm (the biological clock that regulates the sleep-wake cycle).
Further analysis confirmed that the Pandemrix vaccine also caused the disease in vaccinated people in other countries. That the swine flu vaccine causes narcolepsy has been confirmed by the courts.
Nevertheless, Fauci did not let himself be put off.
In December 2015, for instance, the NEJM published his article Ending the HIV–AIDS Pandemic: Follow the Science. In this piece he made a case for "dramatically scale up HIV testing and treatment around the world" - including preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), i.e.,
That is to say, healthy people should take highly toxic drugs.
But here again: As self-assured as he presents his statements, he was not prepared to substantiate them factually.
In my mentioned request to the NIAID, in relation to his 2015 article about PrEP I asked:
Unfortunately, as mentioned, Hillary Hoffman from NIAID just let me know that:
Another example of a Fauci farce is Gilead Sciences' rapid-release drug remdesivir, which was approved on May 2, 2020 in the context of COVID-19 for emergency use only.
A few days before, the NIAID director claimed that a study found remdesivir would reduce recovery time and reduce mortality.
This can only be described as another scandal in which Fauci plays a central role - especially when you look at the fraudulent way in which the drug was approved and which is very similar to the way AZT was authorized in 1987.
An article from the Alliance for Human Research and Protection (AHRP) - Fauci's Promotional Hype Catapults Gilead's remdesivir - brought up the following painful subject:
But while the Chinese study that Fauci denigrated, was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center peer-reviewed, published study in a premier journal, The Lancet, with all data available, the NIAID-Gilead study results the remdesivir approval is based on have not been published in peer-reviewed literature - nor have details of the findings been disclosed.
By the way, regarding Fauci's financial relations with Gilead, there is a petition that requests that he discloses them, since he hasn't done it yet.
What the virus tsar also failed to disclose to the public in his promotional pronouncement of remdesivir was that the primary outcomes of the study that led to its emergency use approval were changed on April 16, 2020. Changes in the primary outcome are posted on clinicaltrials.gov.
Where previously there was an 8-point scale, which also included the deceased patients, from then on there has been only a 3-point scale, which leaves the deceased patient out of the equation and which at the same time only measures the time until recovery or being released from the hospital.
And Reuters News reported that respected prominent leaders in the medical community - such as Steven Nissen MD, the chief academic officer at the Cleveland Clinic and Eric Topol MD, director and founder of the Scripps Research Translational Institute in California - were unimpressed by remdesivir's tentative, modest benefit at best.
Referring to the Lancet report, Topol stated:
As for the NIAID modest results, Dr Topol was unimpressed:
The change in primary outcome measures raised serious red flags for scientists; but was largely ignored by the mainstream media which mostly repeated Fauci's promotional script.
Steve Nissen told The Washington Post:
As you can guess, all the questions I have asked the NIAID regarding remdesivir have remained unanswered as well… [7]
How toxic remdesivir is, is also shown by the fact that just recently, on October 2, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the regulator of medicinal products of the European Union, started a safety review of remdesivir.
Reason: Some patients taking the drug reported serious kidney problems.
About two weeks later, on October 15, the WHO reported that in its own trial named "Solidarity" which started in March this year remdesivir not only failed to produce any measurable benefit in terms of mortality reduction, but that it also didn't reduce the need for ventilators, or the length of hospital stays.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr's organization Children's Health Defense pointed this out on October 23 on its website. Fauci, by contrast, again remained silent about this study.
But Gilead shot ahead and commented in all seriousness "it is unclear if any conclusive findings can be drawn from the [Solidarity] study results," because the trial hadn't been peer reviewed or published in a scholarly journal.
But this comment is downright ridiculous.
On the one hand, it was no less a figure than Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO, who initiated this multi-center, global Solidarity trial (more than 11,300 adults with Covid-19 in 405 hospitals in 30 countries) for the very reason that:
Moreover, Gilead forgot to mention in its statement that the pivotal trial of remdesivir leading to its emergency use approval, as outlined, had not been peer reviewed and published in a solid journal on the day of its approval (May 2nd), either, and that it was seriously flawed.
Nevertheless, the study funded by Fauci's NIAID has been finally published on October 8 in the New England Journal of Medicine (i.e. in the same journals as the fraudulent pivotal trial of AZT).
The only alleged benefit reported was a shorter recovery time for patients receiving remdesivir compared to those in the placebo group.
But this result has no validity, not only because of the seriously flawed underlying data. The way in which this drug got its approval is very reminiscent of the outlined fraudulent way in which AZT received its approval in 1987 in an alleged placebo trial.
But in reality, almost from the beginning, everyone knew who was getting what (AZT or placebo) and patients even had their pills analyzed in the craving for the alleged miracle drug.
Who wants to rule out that this did not happen with remdesivir as well?
Especially since the placebo subjects in the remdesivir study did not receive a real placebo.
Instead, the bulk of the patients got a "placebo" containing the same ingredients as remdesivir except the agent, for example sulfobutylether-beta-cyclodextrin, which can cause serious damage.
Hydroxychloroquine illustrates Fauci's Mendacity
The story of the drug hydroxychloroquine also illustrates Fauci's phoniness. At the end of March, US president Trump called this agent "a gift from God", while Fauci warned against jumping on conclusions.
On May 27, Fauci even stated on CNN about hydroxychloroquine,
And his comments came days after the Lancet published a 96,000-patient observational study that concluded that hydroxychloroquine had no effect on Covid-19 and may have even caused some harm.
Too bad that shortly after, this Lancet study was retracted, because:
Hence, Fauci's assertion on May 27,
Or as Politico put it on May 27:
In fact, in 2005 the Virology Journal published an article concluding that chloroquine (of which hydroxychloroquine is a slightly milder derivative) is a "potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus" dubbed SARS-CoV-1, as health care expert Kevin Corbett points out in a Twitter post on October 26.
And so-called SARS-CoV-2 is claimed to be genetically related to so-called SARS-CoV-1.
Of course, the Virology Journal study lacks validity because the science behind SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 is totally unfounded, and not least also because the study was just a cell culture and not a patient trial.
But Fauci is the world's number one herald of the official corona narrative, and the study has been conducted by CDC scientists. So he should actually be totally convinced that chloroquine (and thus also hydroxychloroquine) is helpful in the context of corona.
Nevertheless, Fauci was unequivocal on Wednesday May 27, saying that "the data are clear right now" that hydroxychloroquine is not effective against the coronavirus.
This is why I asked Fauci's NIAID,
But I have not received an answer to this question, either.
Conversely, this does not mean that the effectiveness of the drug has been properly proven. Let's not forget that hydroxychloroquine is far from a candy, it can have many serious side effects and even be fatal by causing cardiac arrhythmias, for example.
Especially if it is given in higher doses, which is what happened in the treatment of so-called COVID-19 patients.
As mentioned, the experimental administration of high doses of potentially lethal drugs such as hydroxychloroquine is the major factor for the excess mortality observed in some (but not all!) countries.
Risch belongs to the best-known researchers who see a potential curative effect in the drug. The relevant studies with COVID-19 patients,
A view that is also expressed, for example, in the almost 40-page inquiry of Paul V. Sheridan to Fauci with copies sent to President Trump and others.
But even if we assume that administering hydroxychloroquine in lower doses alone, or in combination with an antibiotic and possibly zinc, to so-called COVID-19 patients may help decreasing the hospitalization and mortality risk, for instance, there is definitely no solid proof that this is due to an antiviral/anti-SARS-CoV-2 effect, as claimed.
So the only conclusion would be that the positive effect is due to hydroxychloroquine having an anti-inflammatory effect, antibiotics clearing pathogenic bacteria and zinc boosting the immune system and metabolism function.
Furthermore, it must be considered in this context that administering hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with an antibiotic and maybe zinc cannot be at all a sustainable long-term therapy nor does it represent a real causal therapy.
This approach also just follows,
An approach that finally is just escapist.
This was expressed by Allan Brandt, a medical historian at Harvard Medical School, stating in his book No Magic Bullet - The promise of the magic bullet has never been fulfilled.
Apart from that, there is only one way to prove that a drug or a combination of agents help reducing mortality or hospitalization or is effective in relation to any other clinical endpoint, that is if you do compare it with a real placebo.
As Marcia Angell, former Editor in Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, states quite rightly in her book The Truth About the Drug Companies:
Unfortunately, there is no such placebo-study for hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 showing that this drug is superior compared to doing nothing.
In this context, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote on August 2 on Instagram,
On this point one can indeed only agree with the virus tsar.
And at the beginning of June, researchers reported the results of the first gold-standard clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine in Covid-19, concluding that it did not perform any better than placebo.
But here as well Fauci's hypocrisy shows up in the end.
Not only did the results of the said "first gold-standard" placebo study become known only at the beginning of June - thus a couple of days after Fauci made his unfounded claim that,
Also,
Read the full article (there's more!) at Off-Guardian.org.
And regarding Kary Mullis, mentioned in the Off-Guardian article, who received the Nobel Prize for his invention of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test, this is what he had to say about Fauci before he died:
Trump's Operation Warp Speed 'Dream Team':
The rich get richer. The global vaccine leaders who all worked together in the past trying to develop an mRNA vaccine for HIV/AIDS are now all on the U.S. Government payroll (Except Bill Gates - at least not directly.) Top row left to right: CDC Director Robert Redfield, Bill Gates, Operation Warp Speed Director Dr. Moncef Slaoui. Bottom row next to President Trump: Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Dr. Deborah Birx.
Trump's "Warp Speed" Funding Now Includes HIV Vaccines for Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci's Pet Projects
Some excerpts:
Ben Adams reports:
How clever!
After years of spending hundreds of millions of dollars of U.S. government funding to develop an HIV/AIDS vaccine with no success, now they can utilize the fast-tracking emergency authorized funds for the COVID vaccine through Operation Warp Speed to continue their quest for an HIV RNA vaccine.
The funding will be used to start more than 100 clinical trials in the U.S. and around the world.
One has to wonder where they are going to find all these "volunteers" to participate in so many vaccine trials?
We know from the history of past HIV drug trials, that many children who were the ward of the State were enrolled to these trials, because they had been removed from their parents and put into Foster Care, where the state has total control over their lives, including enrolling them in experimental drug trials.
Full article here...
Judy Mikovits
So of all the scientists who worked at the NIH to develop AIDS drugs, were they all corrupt?
No. One of them became a whistleblower, Dr. Judy Mikovits.
I met Judy in 2015, just shortly after the gag order against her was lifted. I was so shocked by what she was telling me, that I assigned my top investigative reporter at that time, John Thomas, to interview her and publish a series of articles.
See:
In May of 2020, filmmaker Mikki Willis released a trailer on a film he was producing on the Coronavirus fraud: PlanDemic.
In the trailer he interviewed Dr. Judy Mikovits.
I don't think even Mr. Willis could have predicted how popular that trailer would become. It was quickly yanked from YouTube, Facebook, and all social media sites, but we had a copy, as did many others, and that interview went viral in a big way.
By some estimates, almost 1 billion people around the world watched it.
In this interview,
If you have never seen it, this is MUST viewing:
Plandemic - Interview With Dr. Judy Mikovits
ConclusionIt is Time for Anthony Fauci to be Removed from Government and be Tried for his Crimes Against Humanity
EVERYTHING published in this article is OLD information.
Yet for some reason, Fauci is now on the hot seat for his involvement in the Wuhan lab and the creation of a COVID-19 bioweapon.
Senator Rand Paul and others are finally starting to ask questions and raise some concerns, but none have gone far enough yet, as nobody has dealt with the abundance of evidence contained in this article.
Is Fauci too untouchable to face justice?
Maybe here on earth, but justice will most certainly catch up to him at some point, hopefully sooner than later, to stop the carnage of human lives this man has caused, all funded by the American taxpayers...
|
