|
Concerningly, almost no one will entertain this possibility, despite the fact that molecular biology is the easiest discipline in which to cheat. That's because you really cannot do it without computers, and sequencing requires complex algorithms and, importantly, assumptions.
Tweaking algorithms and
assumptions, you can hugely alter the conclusions.
After all, the 'perpetrators' have significant control over the media.
So who do I mean by 'they' and 'the perpetrators'?
There are a number of candidates competing for this position, with their drug company accomplices, several of whom are named in Paula Jardine's excellent five-part series for TCW, High on the list is,
But that doesn't answer the question,
In my view, they are doing their darnedest to make sure you regard this event exactly as they want you to. Specifically,
I'm not alone in believing that myself at the beginning of the 'pandemic', but over time I've seen sufficient evidence to cast strong doubt on that idea.
Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d'état, I have put myself in the position of the most senior, hidden perpetrators.
In a Q&A,
Those top decision-makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is intolerable to them.
They crave total control, and the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action:
The alternative I think they've used is to add one more lie to the tall stack of lies which has surrounded this entire affair.
This lie is that
there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus which,
crucially, caused massive-scale illness and deaths. In fact, there
hasn't.
This fits with cheating about genetic sequences, PCR test protocols (probes, primers, amplification and annealing conditions, cycles), ignoring contaminating genetic materials from not only human and claimed viral sources, but also bacterial and fungal sources.
Notice the soft evidence that our political and cultural leaders, including the late Queen, were happy to meet and greet one another without testing, masking or social distancing.
They had no fear. In the scenario above, a few people would have known there was no new hazard in their environment. If there really was a lethal pathogen stalking the land, I don't believe they'd have had the courage or the need to act nonchalantly and risk exposure to the virus.
The pattern of increased ACM is inconsistent with the presence of a novel respiratory virus as the main cause.
If I'm correct that there was no novel virus,
Now they want you only to consider how this 'killer virus' got into the human population.
Then there's the question as to,
I also need to point out that the perpetrators have hermetic control of the mass media via a Big Tech and government stranglehold documented in part here, here and here.
That's why they've found it so easy to censor people like me.
I believe that the perpetrators, who could be all or any of, ...and numerous others, planted the controversy about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 because a little embarrassment of the establishment was a small price to,
And they have got away with it to date...
To this point, an ex-pharmaceutical industry executive Sasha Latypova, speaking with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on his podcast of last Thursday, March 16, describes the extensive evidence of the contracts and relationships that were in place before the Covid era.
Contracts were signed for billions of dollars in February 2020.
Also, the amounts of any specific DNA sequence required and held in store by commercial suppliers would be milligrams or perhaps grams at a stretch.
So it was always completely unfeasible, regardless of how much money was thrown at the problem, to have accomplished what they claim to have done in a short time.
Consequently, no other conclusion is supported by the facts than that it's a huge crime, extensively planned.
Logically we're left with a leak or, as I argue, a lie plus a PsyOp.
The former may or may not be possible, but what isn't arguable is that something like this could be done and would be likely to run smoothly, with a real pathogen.
Almost any outcome but the one presumably wanted is likely if a pathogen is released. I can reach no other conclusion than that it's fake.
In closing, I'm not saying people weren't sick or that they didn't die in huge numbers.
People were made sick and some killed by all the pre-existing causes, amplified by fear, resulting in immuno-suppression and then a host of revolting actions.
Note even the official overlap of signs and symptoms of 'Covid-19' and existing illnesses.
That didn't happen
in care homes.
I'm sure they're pretty content with getting at least one needle into 6,000,000,000 people.
The indications are that ways to force you to accept ten more have been anticipated, because that's the number of doses your government has agreed to purchase.
Purchasing what...?
Well, it's already been mooted that all existing vaccines are to be reformatted as mRNA types. If this happens, I don't believe anyone injected ten more times is likely to escape death or severe, life-limiting illnesses.
Inducing your body to manufacture non-self proteins will axiomatically induce an autoimmune attack by your own body.
Your disease will be related to where the injected dose goes and of course the consistency of that injected product. They've been horribly erratic so far.
It's not certain they ever could have been made and launched if they had been subject to the usual quality requirements and not granted 'emergency use' authorizations.
Of course, as we
now know, the regulators played an important role beyond lying for
the US military, the organization which made the original orders for
'vaccines', and set all the contractual conditions for companies
such as Moderna and
Pfizer.
It's another lie. It's what they do.
It's all they do...
If you follow the official narrative and I'm right, you and your children will lose all your freedoms and probably your lives. If you believe what I'm saying and I'm wrong, you'll be laughed at.
These options aren't faintly balanced.
It's not a safe position, keeping your counsel and your head down.
It's the most dangerous thing you could do.
|
