|
April 20, 2021
Due to its widespread acceptance by the world's national
governments, it has been extremely successful in assuming the helm
to monitor regional and global infectious diseases and dictate
medical intervention policies to international health agencies.
For approximately a year the WHO has propagated the belief that the
first line of defense for curtailing
the COVID-19 'pandemic' is
self-isolation, distancing, masks and, ultimately, vaccination.
Despite it's mega-pharmaceutical interests and consultants representing private vaccine interests, in the past the WHO has had the audacity to ridicule the pharmaceutical industry of corruption.
These are similar charges that have been leveled against the WHO.
An article in the National Review called the WHO,
In his book, Immunization - How Vaccines Became Controversial, University of Amsterdam professor emeritus Dr. Stuart Blume raises the serious problem of the WHO's most influential advisors on emergency health conditions, such as the current Covid-19 'pandemic' and earlier the 2009 H1N1 swine flu scare that never was,
During times of global emergencies and crises, the WHO confers with a separate group of advisors outside its formal sitting Strategic Advisory Group of Experts or SAGE:
We would add that the WHO's level of incompetence has resulted in serious misinformation about pandemics, medical risks of vaccines and other health-threatening chemicals.
For example, during the early stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, the organization reported it could not find any evidence of human transmission.
However, the WHO has repeatedly kowtowed to China's demands and unscrupulously accepts whatever statistics and statements the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) provides.
Responding to a petition signed by over 700,000 signatories demanding the resignation of the current WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom, Japan's Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso told the Japanese parliament that the organization,
...for favoring China's policy to stall and obstruct international investigations and for lauding unsubstantiated praise on the country's transparency and handling of the 'pandemic'.
Back on December 31, 2019, Taiwan - which has been barred from WHO membership due to China's political maneuvering - had been warning of a possible human-to-human transmission contrary to the wet-market narrative, but this was largely ignored in order to avoid upsetting the CCP.
The UK's Sunday Times reported that Chinese scientists were forced to destroy their proof of the virus shortly after its discovery.
In the province of Hubei, authorities ordered the cessation of further testing and the destruction of existing samples. Other researchers who made efforts to warn the public were punished.
Writing for The Hill, University of Texas at San Antonio professor Bradley Thayer wrote:
Thayer concludes,
He has no formal medical training as a physician or any international management experience in global health.
Many others have voiced similar criticisms pointing out Tedro's unsuitable background.
Moreover, the Director General's conflicts of interest with China abound. Immediately before and after his tenure as the Health Minister for Ethiopia's ruling Communist party, the Tigray People's Liberation Front, China had donated an estimated $60 million to the terrorist government and its social programs.
Now heading the WHO, Tedros appears to continue lobbying on China's behalf.
In 2017, the Washington Post noted the fundamental problem:
Upon assuming his new position at the WHO, Tedros had left Ethiopia's healthcare system in ruin.
As one young healthcare worker reported, there was no,
During the more recent re-investigation of SARS-CoV-2 origins, the Chinese authorities refused to provide raw case data and created repressive conditions to curtail reliable analysis and disclosure.
The WHO's final report concluded that the virus had an animal origin and did not escape Wuhan's high security pathogen laboratory.
But there are viable reasons to discredit the report as untrustworthy at best and perhaps intentionally deceptive.
The team simply inspected seafood and open-air markets.
Consequently, the WHO team returned empty handed and without laboratory records for a proper forensic examination.
Most problematic is the appointment of Peter Daszak on the WHO's group to carry out the investigation.
Daszak, the founding president of the shadowy non-profit organization EcoHealth Alliance, has headed many hunting adventures worldwide to identify the emergence of potential pathogens that could become pandemics.
With the intention to divert attention away from an escaped laboratory virus, Daszak stated on a Going Viral podcast there was no evidential reason to visit and inspect the Wuhan laboratory.
According to Independent Science News, despite Daszak's denial of a lab origin:
The research at the Wuhan lab included ‘gain of function" efforts on coronaviruses, and received funds directly approved by Anthony Fauci. Newsweek reports the NIH had given a total of $7.4 million to the Chinese lab for the research.
The organization has received over $100 million from a variety of sources, including the Department of Defense, Homeland Security, the NIH and undisclosed amounts from the Chinese government.
Daszak himself has authored 25 studies funded by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, think tanks, universities, military institutions, and ministries directly connected with the Chinese Communist Party.
Given the halls of power within the WHO, we are outlining some of the more salient reasons why the organization's declarations about infectious diseases, pandemics and vaccination should not be trusted.
Vaccine Promotional Misconduct
For many years the WHO's recommendations for certain vaccines were kept secret.
Writing in a 2006 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Dr. Marc Girard uncovered,
Dr. Girard testified as a medical expert for a French court in a criminal trial against the WHO after French health officials obliged the organization to launch its universal Hepatitis B vaccine campaign. The campaign resulted in the deaths of French children.
Girard gained access to confidential WHO documents. He noted that the WHO's,
He further accused the WHO serving,
Now during the Covid-19 'pandemic', as early as last July, the WHO approved of China's first vaccine for emergency use, long before it had undergone proper clinical trials and much earlier than Moderna's and Pfizer's mRNA vaccines' approval.
Orchestration of Pandemic Panics
Before the current COVID-19 'pandemic', there was the H1N1 swine flu scare in 2009.
However, at the very start the WHO's fear mongering of a global contagion that could exceed the death counts of the 1918 Spanish flu 'pandemic' was solely based on false rhetoric rather than empirical evidence.
The fabrications are believed to have originated from the WHO's senior consultant on viral outbreaks who happens to carry the reputation of being one of the world's leading 'pandemic' alarmists: Dr. Albert Osterhaus, nicknamed "Dr. Flu."
At the time, Osterhaus was head of the Department of Virology at Erasmus University in the Netherlands.
When the swine flu scare appeared, he was also the president of the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI), an organization funded by the major vaccine manufacturers including Baxter, MedImmune, Glaxo, Sanofi Pasteur and others.
It was also Osterhaus who transformed an otherwise potentially bad flu season into a global 'pandemic'.
The WHO has been criticized harshly in the media for changing the definition of a "'pandemic'" and in doing so has been charged with benefitting the pharmaceutical industry.
The British Medical Journal reported that the WHO failed to report conflicts of interest in its H1N1 advisory group. The journal's Editor-in-Chief Fiona Godlee wrote:
The former head of the prestigious Cochrane Database Collaboration's vaccine studies, Dr. Tom Jefferson, told a Der Spiegel interviewer,
When the 2009 H1N1 influenza strain appeared, the WHO rushed forward to mangle its earlier criteria that would realistically define a 'pandemic'. The organization intentionally removed reference to a pathogen's "severity" as a necessary requirement.
Moreover, the WHO's decision to label the outbreak as a 'pandemic' was not based upon its own permanent vaccine experts but on the recommendations of a non-disclosed group of outside consultants.
According to a financial forecast published by JP Morgan, the collaboration between the WHO and Osterhaus's ESWI to orchestrate the 'pandemic' would have profited the pharmaceutical industry up to $10 billion. Der Spiegel reported:
In 2010, the EU's Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe launched an investigation into the evidence that the WHO had created "a fake 'pandemic'" in order to financially benefit the pharmaceutical giants' vaccine market and to strengthen the influence private drug interests have over the health organization.
The Assembly's chairperson Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg charged the WHO's fake 'pandemic' as,
Epidemic of Conflict of Interests
According to former World Bank geopolitical analyst Peter Koenig, about half of the WHO's budget is derived from private sources - primarily pharmaceutical companies but also other corporate sectors including the telecommunication and agro-chemical industries.
It also receives large donations from large philanthropic organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI.
Eleven years ago, Gates had committed $10 billion to the WHO; after the US, his Foundation is its second largest donor providing 10 percent of its funding. His financial commitment aligned with his global ambition to "make this the decade of vaccines."
Koenig also believes that Tedros's appointment was due to Gates' influence. This may carry some truth because Tedros is a former Chair of GAVI's Vaccine Alliance.
Barbara Loe Fisher at the National Vaccine Information Center estimates that,
There is also the deep personal and financial relationship between Gates and the Chinese Communist government that demands further investigation. Gates is a member of the Chinese Academy of Science.
For the moment, the WHO has been advising against Covid-19 vaccine passports as a mandate to travel.
Nevertheless, China has already launched encrypted digital certificates as proof of vaccination.
Given Gates' close relationship with Chinese officials, perhaps he is awaiting on China to establish a precedent for other nations to agree on a global mandate that will eventually be propagated by the Gates' network and the World Economic Forum and its Great Reset.
During a 2020 TED talk, Gates had already revealed that digital vaccine passports may be necessary; that part of his speech was edited from the original video, however, Robert Kennedy Jr. tracked down the original footage.
Gates has also,
Finally, Gates shares the Chinese Communist Party's interests in collecting and ‘mining" citizens' DNA.
A 60 Minutes expose presented the covert activities of BGI Genomics, a CCP-linked firm that has exported Covid-19 tests to "collect, store and exploit biometric information" on American citizens.
Independent investigations reveal that the Gates Foundation has collaborated with BGI and it was through Gates' influence over Obama that the Chinese company entered the US market.
BGI's RT-PCR kit was promoted by the WHO back in May 2020 for first line emergency diagnostic use. The rationale was that the test was highly sensitive, specific and user-friendly.
Subsequently the EU, FDA, and the Australian, Canadian and Japanese health ministries rapidly purchased and deployed it. On its website, the Gates Foundation acknowledges its role in having the PCR tests supplied to the WHO.
Three months later, Sweden filed complaints after reports of a high percentage of false positives from the Chinese tests.
There is in our opinion little doubt that the WHO is another one of Gates' bought off entities for furthering his personal agenda to promote vaccines, genetically modified seeds and chemical agriculture in the developing world.
Vaccine Adverse Effects Monitoring System Needs Overhaul
The WHO's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety is the group responsible for administering vaccine programs in poorer, developing countries. It is also responsible for gathering data on incidents of vaccine injuries.
Any deaths following vaccination campaigns are ignored and ruled as coincidental.
This policy is based on the erroneous assumption that if no one died during a vaccine's clinical trials, then the vaccine should be regarded as automatically safe and unrelated to any deaths that might occur later.
Consequently, the WHO's monitoring system is seriously flawed and requires a major overhaul.
One of the more controversial incidences was the WHO's collaboration with the Bill Gates' GAVI campaign to launch the Pentavalent vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, HIP and Hepatitis B) in Africa and later in South and Southeast Asia.
In India, health officials recorded upwards to 8,190 additional infant deaths annually following Pentavalent campaign. The WHO's response was to reclassify its adverse event reporting system to disregard "infant" deaths altogether.
Dr. Jacob Puliyel, a member of the Indian government's National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization concluded:
WHO's Double Standards of Vaccine Safety
A more recent scandal erupted during the WHO's Global Vaccine Safety Summit convened in December 2019.
Days before the summit, one of the WHO's medical directors for vaccination, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, appeared in a public advertisement touting the unquestionable safety of vaccines and ridiculing parents who speak out against vaccination.
She assured viewers that the WHO was in control of matters and monitored any potential adverse risks carefully.
However, during the Summit, the same Dr. Swaminathan acknowledged vaccine health risks and stated:
Another Summit participant, Dr. Heidi Larson stated:
And more noteworthy were the statements by Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator of the WHO's Initiative for Vaccine Research,
In other words, what the WHO presents to the public contradicts what is discussed behind closed doors, another example of the veil of secrecy the organization operates within.
Now we are witnessing more countries halting further administration of AstraZeneca's Covid vaccine, a vaccine Trump had committed $1.2 billion towards its development.
Subsequently the CDC paused Johnson & Johnson's similar engineered adenovirus vaccine in order to investigate its association with an otherwise rare condition of fatal blood clotting.
The WHO on the other hand has ignored these nations' ethical responsibility to adhere to the precautionary principle.
Its own review claimed there were no blood clot links to AstraZeneca's vaccine.
Later the WHO changed its tune to "plausible" after EU regulators found a causal link and the New England Journal of Medicine published two studies providing specific details confirming these adverse reactions.
Although acknowledging these risks, the WHO has continued to recommend that mass vaccination proceed as if there were no red alarms.
WHO's Depopulation Efforts with Vaccines
Without doubt, the most nefarious activity conducted by the WHO is its alleged support and distribution of vaccines to poorer developing countries that may have been intentionally designed to decrease population rates.
Back in 1989, the WHO sponsored a symposium at its Geneva headquarters on "Antifertility Vaccines and Contraceptive Vaccines."
The symposium presented proposals for vaccines that were later discovered to have been laced with the sterilizing hormones HCG and estradiol; the former prevents pregnancy and triggers spontaneous abortions and miscarriages, and the latter can turn men infertile.
In 2015, the Kenyan Conference of Catholic Bishops reported its discovery of a polio vaccine laced with estradiol that was manufactured in India and distributed by the WHO.
A year earlier, Dr. Wahome Ngare from the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association uncovered a tetanus vaccine specifically being administered to women, also distributed by the WHO, that contained the HCG hormone.
All of the polio vaccine samples tested contained HCG, estrogen-related compounds, follicle stimulating and luteinizing hormones, which will damage sperm formation in the testes.
Even more disturbing, this vaccine was going to be administered to children under five years of age.
However, this is not the first time the WHO appears to have made efforts to use vaccination campaigns for depopulation.
A decade earlier, in 2004, the WHO, UNICIF and CDC launched a vaccination campaign to immunize 74 million African children during a polio outbreak.
The initiative encountered a serious obstacle. In Nigeria, laboratory tests on the WHO's vaccine samples resulted in the presence of estrogen and other female hormones.
And in the mid-1990s, a tetanus vaccine being administered to Nicaraguan and Filipino girls and women in their child-bearing years was discovered to contain HCG, which accounted for a large number of spontaneous abortions that were reported by Catholic health workers.
Illegal Vaccine Experiments
In 2014, The Economic Times of India published a report that provided details of a joint venture between the WHO and the Gates Foundation to test an experimental HPV vaccine on approximately 16,000 tribal girls between the ages of 9 and 15 unwittingly.
The experiment was conducted in 2008, and the vaccine is now what we commonly know as Gardasil. Many of the girls, the report states, became ill and some died.
The following year the WHO and Gates Foundation conducted a similar experiment on 14,000 girls with the HPV vaccine Cervarix.
Again "scores of teenage girls were hospitalized."
Investigations led by Indian health officials uncovered gross violations in India's laws regarding medical safety.
In numerous cases there was no consent and the children had no idea what they were being vaccinated for. The Indian Supreme Court has taken up a case against the duo for criminal charges.
There are many other questionable activities that the WHO has been involved with over the years. However, the above provide sufficient evidence to argue the case that, at least within the upper echelons of the WHO, global health does not stand in high priority.
The organization employs over 7,000 people around the world and most of these have deep concern for improving the lives of populations in poor and developing nations.
On the other hand, the WHO's leaders are there largely because the powers of Washington, London and the pharmaceutical industry benefit by the organization advancing its agendas.
Of course, the WHO is not the only health entity with a legacy of corruption.
Corruption appears to be systemic throughout global health and national health agencies.
This topic was featured last year in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet.
Author Dr. Patricia Garcia writes:
Bear in mind, the WHO, along with Bill Gates and his Foundation, and Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Disease, are leading the efforts,
Already the Gates Foundation has given $1.75 billion for developing and distributing these vaccines.
Do you believe we can trust their judgment and the intense public relations effort that will immediately follow after such a vaccine reaches the market...?
|
