|
Mary-Jean Harris, BSc, MSc
(physics), contributed to this article.
From this standpoint, climate alarmism has become
nothing short of a religion, one that has been taking over societies
around the world.
Margaret Anna Alice, a writer focusing on propaganda and psychology, writes in her Canaries essay about how she lost her "religion" of climate alarmism, which for her had been an "inviolable belief."
Pope Leo in bizarre green ritual. X/screencap
She writes that,
Additionally, "sermons" cite the "sacred texts" of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), shaming everyday citizens into believing that they are contributing to a devastating environmental catastrophe.
It is only by aligning themselves with the
religion of climate alarmism that they will be redeemed from their
sins, namely, by giving up their standards of living and putting
their hard-earned money toward expensive projects to reduce
carbon dioxide (CO2)
or subsidize intermittent and expensive
renewable power such as
wind and
solar.
Yet data corruption abounds at the IPCC and other official institutions, and for decades, few scientists have had the courage to speak out against it with their livelihoods on the line.
These "heretics" are ostracized, lose their jobs, or are refused funding. But the tide is shifting.
With the serious consequences of climate policies being enacted, now is the time to reveal that the climate scare is based on corruption and flawed ideology.
Governments will spend trillions of dollars and drive their citizens into poverty if we continue down the route to Net Zero.
IPCC contributor Mike Hulme admitted that,
And the scientists and experts writing in
Canary in a Climate World: Climate Realism vs. the Net Zero Myth
are also disseminating crucial information to help us better
understand the climate and the policies that have stifled our
society's growth for decades.
Climate alarmist forecasts are not scientific theories because NONE of their predictions have come true...
Yet true science is about how well a theory's predictions agree with observations and how well it can predict previously unobserved phenomena.
Climate alarmism has failed this crucial test, and so it,
Dr. Happer compares climate alarmism to the geocentric view of the universe in the 1600s during the time of the scientist Giordano Bruno.
Bruno was burned alive by Pope Clement VIII for promoting the idea that,
...and later that century, Galileo Galilei was nearly subjected to the same fate for similar views.
But the church did not want to look at the evidence:
For another inside view, astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon writes in his Canaries essay that,
Researchers are trained to ask "safe" questions that align with the current dogma, and reviewers censor any research papers that question the status quo.
Indeed, it has become an orthodoxy that parallels a religious sect.
But science is antithetical to dogma:
And so most research into climate change is running counter to science entirely.
Science is always evolving, and when evidence
arises that contradicts a scientist's previous theories, they must
question their previous assumptions and adjust their theories
accordingly.
His inside view of the scientific process of publication has led him to conclude that,
Dr. Christy suggests forming a "Red Team" report from experts with alternative views on climate change.
But the truth will eventually win out: with any luck, sooner rather than later.
Dr. Happer gives us hope, saying that,
The torch is in your hands:
The choice is yours...!
|
