by Michael E. Salla, PhD
November 18, 2004
I would like to comment
on the recent events in the CIA and the top level
resignations that have occurred that with the new Director,
Porter Goss. It's clear that there is some payback happening
here for what occurred during the recent election when the CIA
played a role in leaking information about the Bush
administration. Some Senators such as John McCain describe
the CIA as a rogue institution and that it needed to
be reigned in. See the following story on this:
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/editorial/outlook/2906907
Well the question that can be raised is how do all these events
relate to exopolitics? On a conventional political level, we can see
this 'housecleaning' at the CIA as the triumph
of a hard-line neo-conservative approach to foreign policy over a
more moderate and cooperative approach to major foreign policy
issues. The CIA under Tenet did have a more
cautious approach to Iraq and this was consistently
ignored by the Bush administration, and Tenet and the
CIA were made the scapegoat for the manipulation of
intelligence material that supported the preemptive war.
The departure of Colin Powell from the Department of State
signifies that the Bush administration will not tolerate
dissent at the Cabinet level from the main foreign policy principles
that Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Cheney
are advocating. So we have all the signs of a recent power struggle
and that neo-conservatives have triumphed, and will set the
agenda for the next four years. This is where it becomes interesting
in terms of the
shadow government and
exopolitics.
It is fairly well known that the shadow government has been divided
by factional struggles over how to approach the ET
issue. One faction advocates a hard-line approach, while the other
is more tolerant and supportive of the ET presence.
Whistleblowers such as
Daniel Burisch have commented
extensively on these different approaches, and the factional
infighting that has occurred.
Now as I've argued in a number of papers, the US has a number of
agreements with ETs that started
under the Eisenhower administration.
In my view, the secret agreements with the ETs has
predictably led to diverging opinions within the shadow
government on how to respond to the ETs. One
position is that they can be trusted and can greatly assist humanity
through technology exchanges, assistance, etc. This is especially
championed by whistleblowers such as
Dan Burisch or
Michael Wolf who interacted
with the Gray ETs that participated in these
agreements. Individuals promoting this view basically have much
trust in the Grays from Zeta Reticulum,
and the Tall Grays from Orion, as
dependable allies in helping humanity emerge into an interplanetary
society.
The other position is that the ETs with whom the
agreements have been made can't really be trusted and this is where
one reads reports of a hard line approach to ETs
advocated by people such as
Col Philip Corso in his Day
After Roswell. Individuals promoting this hard-line approach are
very nationalistic and prepared to fight to maintain US independence
from manipulation by the Grays while simultaneously
seeking technology and assistance from the Grays in a variety of
joint projects such as at
Dulce, New Mexico.
I think that the struggle we've seen in the conventional political
system between a hard-line neo-conservative and more moderate
cooperative approach to foreign policy mirrors what has been
happening in the shadow government. So what we have now is evidence
of the emergence of a hard-line approach to the ET
presence. This takes me to the topic of extraterrestrial
disclosure since I believe that we are quickly reaching
that time when some announcement will be made. I think this
is inevitable since frankly as you have guessed by now, terrorism
is a pretty feeble enemy against the U.S., and there needs to be a
new enemy to justify the enormous military expenditure that is
occurring and the
black budget that is
covertly collected by the CIA.
This is an idea that Carol Rosin has been saying for years
based on her experiences with the corporate military world, and what
Werner Von Braun told her would eventually happen as
different threats would lose appeal. See report
HERE.
It seems that once terrorism becomes a toothless tiger, the
shadow government will draw
out the ET bogey after having exhausted everything
else. We know that in 2005, there will be a remake of War of the
Worlds by Steven Spielberg so there's a hint that some
kind of hard-line approach is very likely when it comes to ETs.
To sum up so far, the cleaning out of the CIA is
evidence of a power play by the neo-conservatives to edge out of key
positions more moderate and cooperative approaches to foreign
policy, and more covertly to the ET presence. This is
done in preparation for a disclosure announcement once it has
been concluded that the terrorist bogey has no psychological
impact on the American population. The likely spin to be placed on
the ETs is that while there have been a number of
agreements reached with them, they can't be trusted and so a
rigorous national security system has to be set up to monitor
them and the humans they interact with. All this will serve to
justify the vast national security system set in place to
monitor extraterresrials, and the vast black
budget created to fund this system.
Well the key question that can be asked is whether the triumph of
the neo-conservatives is a bad policy development or not when
it comes to ET affairs? Frankly, I'm divided on this.
On the one hand, I see a great threat posed by the agreements set
up with ETs from Zeta Reticulum and from
Orion. The research I've done on different ET races
shows that these ETs have a track record in subverting
worlds and using the captive population as a gene pool. A number of
contactees with alleged Nordices from a number
of worlds mention this kind of scenario, e.g.,
Billy Meier,
Alex Collier, Enrique
Castillo. For example, the following statement from an alleged
Nordic ET from Procyon exemplifies this
alarming scenario:
"The Grays
began to visit us, first a few as ambassadors, then as
specialists in various domains where their expertise could be
useful to us, as participants in different programs that
involved mutual collaboration, and finally as tourists. What had
begun as a trickle became a flood, as they came in
ever-increasing numbers, slowly but surely infiltrating our
society at all levels, penetrating even the most secret of our
elite power groups….
Just as on your
planet they began by unobtrusively gaining control over key
members of the CIA and KGB through
techniques unknown to them, such as telepathic hypnosis
that manipulates the reptilian levels of the brain,
so on Procyon through the same techniques … they
established a kind of telepathic hypnotic control over our
leaders. Over our leaders and over almost all of us, because
it was as if we were under a spell that was leading us to our
doom, as if we were being programmed by a type of ritual black
magic that we did not realize existed." (Detailed report
HERE)
On the other hand, a
national security crack down by neo-conservatives who play
the ET bogey also carries dangers in terms of how all
ET affairs would presumably be closely monitored and
subject to approval. Centralizing national security institutions and
limiting human extraterrestrial contacts to only those
approved by key government agencies carries risks as well. We
could well imagine the creation of a Fortress Terra
where only those ETs who trade technology with the
government will be officially approved. Such ETs will
be closely monitored as well as those citizens who have contact with
these. This could well mean the exclusion of the many positive
ET races that have assisted in the moral and spiritual
development of humanity, and who have declined to participate in
technology exchanges which they rightly perceived would be exploited
for weapons purposes. Excluding such positive extraterrestrial
races from interacting with humanity would make it possible for
extraterrestrial subversion to occur by those ETs with
whom agreements have been made (See detailed report
HERE).
I believe humanity is entering treacherous territory where we will
have to skillfully navigate between the dangers of ET subversion
by cooperating too closely with the Grays from
Zeta Reticulum/Orion or cracking down too hard on all
forms of ET contact. I still believe that the best
solution we have to dealing with the ET presence is to
have an open transparent system where private citizens are given a
more prominent role in the decision making about which ETs
to work with, and how to deal with problems of subversion,
manipulation etc., by some ETs (see report
HERE). Exopolitics
will soon burst into the public arena as an urgent set of policy
issues, we will do well to be prepared for the exopolitics issues
about to be thrust upon us.
|