by Paul Joseph Watson
June 26, 2009
from
PrisonPlanet Website
|
The elite agenda for global population
control is not a “conspiracy theory,” it is on the record and
documented |
There are still large numbers of people amongst
the general public, in academia, and especially those who work for the
corporate media, who are still in denial about the on-the-record stated
agenda for global population reduction, as well as the consequences of this
program that we already see unfolding.
We have compiled a compendium of evidence to prove that the elite have been
obsessed with eugenics and its modern day incarnation, population control,
for well over 100 years and that goal of global population reduction is
still in full force to this day.
The World’s Elite Are
Discussing Population Reduction
As was reported only last month by the London Times, a “secret billionaire
club” meeting in early May which took place in New York and was attended by
David Rockefeller, Ted Turner,
Bill Gates and others was focused around “how
their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population”.
We questioned establishment media spin which portrayed the attendees as
kind-hearted and concerned philanthropists by pointing out that Ted Turner
has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would
cull the human population by a staggering 95%. He has also called for a
Communist-style one child policy to be mandated by governments in the west.
In China, the one child policy is enforced by means of taxes on each
subsequent child, allied to an intimidation program which includes secret
police and “family planning” authorities kidnapping pregnant women from
their homes and performing forced abortions.
Of course, Turner completely fails to follow his own rules on how everyone
else should live their lives, having five children and owning no less than 2
million acres of land.
In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population
reduction, namely through
United Nations programs, leading the way for the
likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates’ father has long been
a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist).
The notion that these elitists merely want to slow population growth in
order to improve health is a complete misnomer. Slowing the growth of the
world’s population while also improving its health are two irreconcilable
concepts to the elite.
Stabilizing world population is a natural
byproduct of higher living standards, as has been proven by the
stabilization of the white population in the west. Elitists like David
Rockefeller have no interest in “slowing the growth of world population” by
natural methods, their agenda is firmly rooted in the pseudo-science of
eugenics, which is all about “culling” the surplus population via draconian
methods.
David Rockefeller’s legacy is not derived from a well-meaning
“philanthropic” urge to improve health in third world countries, it is born
out of a Malthusian drive to eliminate the poor and those deemed racially
inferior, using the justification of
social Darwinism.
As is documented in Alex Jones’ seminal film
Endgame, Rockefeller’s father,
John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics to Germany from its origins in
Britain by bankrolling the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute which later would form a
central pillar in the Third Reich’s ideology of the Nazi super race.
After
the fall of the Nazis, top German eugenicists were protected by the allies
as the victorious parties fought over who would enjoy their “expertise” in
the post-war world.
As Dr.
Len Horowitz writes,
“In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized
the U.S. eugenics movement in their own family offices, with spinoff
population-control and abortion groups. The Eugenics Society changed its
name to the Society for the Study of Social Biology, its current name.”
“The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in
England, apparently repaying Britain for the fact that British capital
and an Englishman-partner had started old John D. Rockefeller out in his
Oil Trust. In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted what
they called Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official reports that they
would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as
eugenics.”
“With support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set
up a sub-committee called the International Planned Parenthood
Federation, which for 12 years had no other address than the Eugenics
Society.
This, then, is the private, international apparatus which has
set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag.”
In the latter half of the 20th century, eugenics
merely changed its face to become known as “population control”.
This was crystallized in
National Security Study
Memorandum 200, a 1974 geopolitical strategy document prepared by
Rockefeller’s intimate friend and fellow Bilderberg member
Henry Kissinger,
which targeted thirteen countries for massive population reduction by means
of creating food scarcity, sterilization and war.
Henry Kissinger
In the now declassified 1974
document,
National Security Memorandum 200,
Kissinger outlines the plan to
use food scarcity as a weapon in order to achieve population reduction in
lesser-developed countries.
The document, declassified in 1989, identified 13 countries that were of
special interest to U.S. geopolitical objectives and outlined why population
growth, and particularly that of young people who were seen as a
revolutionary threat to U.S. corporations, was a potential roadblock to
achieving these objectives.
The countries named were:
-
India
-
Bangladesh
-
Pakistan
-
Nigeria
-
Mexico
-
Indonesia
-
Brazil
-
the Philippines
-
Thailand
-
Egypt
-
Turkey
-
Ethiopia
-
Colombia
The study outlined how civil disturbances affecting the “smooth flow of
needed materials” would be less likely to occur “under conditions of slow or
zero population growth.”
“Development of a worldwide political and
popular commitment to population stabilization is fundamental to any
effective strategy. This requires the support and commitment of key LDC
leaders. This will only take place if they clearly see the negative
impact of unrestricted population growth and believe it is possible to
deal with this question through governmental action,” states the
document.
The document called for integrating “family
planning” (otherwise known as abortion) with routine health services for the
purposes of “curbing the numbers of LDC people,” (lesser-developed
countries).
The report shockingly outlines how withholding food could be used as a means
of punishment for lesser-developed countries who do not act to reduce their
population, essentially using food as a weapon for a political agenda by
creating mass starvation in under-developed countries.
“The allocation of scarce PL480 (food)
resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in
population control as well as food production,” states the document.
Later in the document, the idea of enforcing
“mandatory programs” by using food as “an instrument of national power” is
presented.
The document states that the program will be administered through the United
Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), thereby,
“avoiding the danger that some LDC leaders
will see developed-country pressures for family planning as a form of
economic or racial imperialism; this could well create a serious
backlash.”
As Jean Guilfoyle writes,
“NSSM 200 was a statement composed after the
fact."
During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the U.S.
had worked diligently behind the scenes to advance the population-control
agenda at the United Nations, contributing the initial funding of $1
million.
A Department of State telegram, dated July 1969, reported the support of
John D. Rockefeller III, among others, for the appointment of Rafael
Salas of the Philippines as senior officer to co-ordinate and administer the
UN population program. The administrator of the UN Development Program
reported confidentially that he preferred someone such as Salas who had the
“advantage of color, religion (Catholic) and conviction.”
A comprehensive outline of what is contained in the National Security
Memorandum document can be read at
here.
Evidence of the actual consequences of this program can be found with the
link between vaccines and sterilization, as well as other diseases such as
cancer, in both the west and the third world.
In the following video clip, after an introduction by Alex Jones, women of
the Akha tribe who live predominately in Thailand, describe how they
miscarried shortly after
taking vaccines when they were eight months
pregnant.
The videos below highlight the efforts of supporters of the Akha
tribe to get answers from the University of Oregon and
the United Nations,
who provided funding for the vaccination and sterilization programs.
Further evidence of the link between vaccinations, birth control, cancer and
other diseases can be researched here.
In the 21st century, the eugenics movement has changed its stripes once
again, manifesting itself through the global carbon tax agenda and the
notion that having too many children or enjoying a reasonably high standard
of living is destroying the planet through global warming, creating the
pretext for further regulation and control over every facet of our lives.
As we have tirelessly documented, the elite’s drive for population control
is not based around a benign philanthropic urge to improve living standards,
it is firmly routed in eugenics, racial hygiene and fascist thinking.
The London Times reports that
the
secret billionaire cabal, with its
interest in population reduction, has been dubbed ‘The Good Club’ by
insiders. This couldn’t be further from the truth.
Anyone who takes the time to properly research
the origins of the “population control” movement will come to understand
that the Rockefeller-Turner-Gates agenda for drastic population
reduction, which is now clearly manifesting itself through real
environmental crises like,
...has its origins in the age-old malevolent
elitist agenda to cull the human “chattel” as one would do to rodents or any
other species deemed a nuisance by the central planning authorities.
Sterilization And
Eugenics Returns In Popular Culture
We are now seeing the return of last century’s eugenicist movement through
the popular promotion of sterilization as a method of birth control.
A popular women’s magazine in the UK recently featured an article entitled,
Young, Single and Sterilized, in which
women in their 20’s discussed why they had undergone an operation to prevent
them from ever having children.
The article is little more than PR for a
“women’s charity” called Marie Stopes International, an organization
that carries out abortions and sterilizations and was founded by a Nazi
eugenicist who advocated compulsory sterilization of non-whites and “those
of bad character”.
In the article, sterilization is lauded as an “excellent method of birth
control” by Dr. Patricia Lohr of the British Pregnancy Advisory
Service.
The article includes an advertisement that encourages women to seek “more
information about sterilization” by contacting Marie Stopes International.
We read that,
“Over the past year, a quarter of the women
who booked a sterilization consultation with women’s charity Marie
Stopes were aged 30 or under.”
Marie Stopes was a feminist who opened
the first birth control clinic in Britain in 1921 as well as being Nazi
sympathizer and a eugenicist who advocated that non-whites and the poor be
sterilized.
Stopes, a racist and an anti-Semite, campaigned for selective breeding to
achieve racial purity, a passion she shared with Adolf Hitler in adoring
letters and poems that she sent the leader of the Third Reich.
Stopes also attended the Nazi congress on population science in Berlin in
1935, while calling for the,
“compulsory sterilization of the diseased,
drunkards, or simply those of bad character.”
Stopes acted on her appalling
theories by concentrating her abortion clinics in poor areas so as to reduce
the birth rate of the lower classes.
Stopes left most of her estate to the
Eugenics Society, an organization that
shared her passion for racial purity and still exists today under the new
name
The Galton Institute.
The society has included members such as:
Ominously,
The Galton Institute website promotes its support and funding
initiative for,
“the practical delivery of family planning facilities,
especially in developing countries.”
In other words, the same organization
that once advocated sterilizing black people to achieve racial purity in the
same vein as the Nazis is now bankrolling abortions of black babies in the
third world.
While the issue of abortion is an entirely different argument, most would
agree that no matter how extreme it sounds, a woman has the right to
sterilize herself if she so chooses, just as a man has the right to a
vasectomy.
But when a magazine aimed primarily at young women all but encourages girls
as young as 20 to have their fallopian tubes tied in order to prevent the
“irritation” of children entering their lives and then advertises an
organization founded by a Nazi eugenicist that can perform the operation,
something has to be amiss.
Even more shocking than this is the fact that the majority of people in the
UK routinely express their support for society’s “undesirables” to be
forcibly sterilized by the state, harking back to a time when such a thing
was commonplace right up to the 1970’s in some areas of America and Europe.
Marie Stopes,
the Nazi and pioneering eugenicist
who sent love letters to Hitler,
honored recently by the Royal Mail.
As we highlighted at the time, respondents to a Daily Mail article
about Royal Mail honoring Marie Stopes by using her image on a commemorative
stamp were not disgusted at Royal Mail for paying homage to a racist Nazi
eugenicist, but were merely keen to express their full agreement that
those deemed not to be of pure genetic stock or of the approved character
should be forcibly sterilized and prevented from having children.
“A lot of people should be sterilized, IMO.
It’s still true today,” wrote one.
“Just imagine what a stable, well-ordered society we’d have if
compulsory sterilization had been adopted years ago for the socially
undesirable,” states another respondent, calling for a
“satellite-carried sterilization ray” to be installed in space to zap
the undesirables.
Shockingly, another compares sterilization and
genocide of those deemed inferior to the breeding and culling of farmyard
animals, and says that such a move is necessary to fight overpopulation and
global warming.
Here is the comment in full from “Karen” in
Wales:
We breed farm animals to produce the best
possible stock and kill them when they have fulfilled their purpose. We
inter-breed pedigree animals to produce extremes that leave them open to
ill-health and early death. It is only religion that says humans are not
animals. The reality is that we are simply intelligent, mammalian
primates.
The world population of humans has increased from 2 billion to 6.5
billion in the last 50 years. This planet can support 2 billion humans
comfortably. 6.5 billion humans use too many resources and leads to
global warming, climate change and a very uncertain future for all of us
- humans and all other life sharing this planet with us.
Marie Stopes believed in population control and
in breeding the best possible humans. So did Hitler. Neither of the aims are
bad in themselves. It is how they are achieved that is the problem. The fact
that we still remember Marie Stopes is an achievement in itself.
The nature of these comments is so fundamentally sick and twisted that one
is tempted to dismiss them as a joke - but these people are deadly serious.
Presumably they would also agree with China’s one child policy, which is
routinely enforced by intimidation as young pregnant women are grabbed off
the streets by state goons and taken to hospitals where forced abortions are
carried out.
Now with popular women’s magazines advising women in their 20’s where they
can go to be sterilized and ensure a lifetime of partying and carefree sex,
it’s no surprise that experts predict that by 2010 one in four western women
will be child free for life.
The yearning to have children is the most beautiful, natural and innate
emotion either a man or a woman can possibly experience.
That is not to say that it’s always wrong for
some people not to have children - extreme circumstances can justify such a
decision. But to have yourself sterilized because you find children to be an
“irritant” and want to live a life free of responsibility or consequences is
an awful message to send to young women, especially in the sex-saturated
entertainment culture that we are now forced to endure.
Furthermore, the outright promotion of
Marie Stopes International as ‘the
place to go’ to get sterilized if you’re under 30 is stomach-churning
considering the fact that the origins of this organization can be found in
Nazi ideology, racist and backward early 20th century eugenics and a
long-standing agenda to cull the population of undesirables, an abhorrent
belief still held by elites across the planet today.
Genocidal Population
Reduction Programs Embraced By Academia
One such individual who embraces the notion that humans are a virus that
should be wiped out en masse for the good of mother earth is Dr.
Eric R. Pianka, an American biologist based at the University of Texas in Austin.
Dr Erik Pianka,
the American biologist
who advocated the mass genocide of 90% of the human race
and was applauded
by his peers.
During a speech to the Texas Academy of Science in March 2006, Pianka
advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the world’s population through the
airborne ebola virus. The reaction from scores of top scientists and
professors in attendance was not one of shock or revulsion - they stood and
applauded Pianka’s call for mass genocide.
Pianka’s speech was ordered to be kept off the record before it began as
cameras were turned away and hundreds of students, scientists and professors
sat in attendance.
Saying the public was not ready to hear the information presented, Pianka
began by exclaiming,
“We’re no better than bacteria!”, as he
jumped into a doomsday malthusian rant about overpopulation
destroying the earth.
Standing in front of a slide of human skulls,
Pianka gleefully advocated airborne Ebola as his preferred method of
exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of
its faster kill period.
Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths
imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs.
The body
literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every
orifice.
Pianka then cited the Peak Oil fraud as another
reason to initiate global genocide.
“And the fossil fuels are running out,” he
said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be
about one-third as many people.”
Later, the scientist welcomed the potential
devastation of the avian flu virus and spoke glowingly of China’s enforced
one child policy, before zestfully commenting,
“We need to sterilize everybody on the
Earth.”
At the end of Pianka’s speech the audience
erupted not to a chorus of boos and hisses but to a raucous reception of
applause and cheers as audience members clambered to get close to the
scientist to ask him follow up questions.
Pianka was later presented with a
distinguished scientist award by the Academy. Pianka is no crackpot. He has
given lectures to prestigious universities worldwide.
Indeed, the notion that the earth’s population needs to be drastically
reduced is a belief shared almost unanimously by academics across the
western hemisphere.
In 2002, The Melbourne Age reported on newly uncovered documents detailing
Nobel Peace Prize winning microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet’s plan to
help the Australian government develop biological weapons for use against
Indonesia and other “overpopulated” countries of South-East Asia.
From the article:
Sir Macfarlane recommended in a secret
report in 1947 that biological and chemical weapons should be developed
to target food crops and spread infectious diseases. His key advisory
role on biological warfare was uncovered by Canberra historian Philip
Dorling in the National Archives in 1998.
“Specifically to the Australian situation, the most effective
counter-offensive to threatened invasion by overpopulated Asiatic
countries would be directed towards the destruction by biological or
chemical means of tropical food crops and the dissemination of
infectious disease capable of spreading in tropical but not under
Australian conditions,” Sir Macfarlane said.
The Victorian-born immunologist, who headed the Walter and Eliza Hall
Institute of Medical Research, won the Nobel prize for medicine in 1960.
He died in 1985 but his theories on immunity and “clonal selection”
provided the basis for modern biotechnology and genetic engineering.
Controversy surrounding the comments of another
darling of scientific academia, geneticist James Watson, who told a
Sunday
Times newspaper interviewer that black people are inherently less
intelligent than whites, should come as no surprise to those who are aware
of Watson’s role in pushing the dark pseudo-science of eugenics.
Watson told the interviewer that he was,
“inherently gloomy about the
prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact
that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says
not really”.
Watson was the Head of the
Human Genome Project until 1992 and is best known
for his contribution to the discovery of DNA, an achievement that won him
the Nobel Peace prize in 1962.
But what most people are unaware of is the fact that Watson has played an
integral role in advancing the legitimacy of the eugenics/population
reduction movement for decades.
Watson is a strong proponent of genetic screening, a test to determine
whether a couple is at increased risk of having a baby with a hereditary
genetic disorder.
Since such screening obviously increases the rate of abortions of babies
considered “imperfect,” many have slammed its introduction as nothing more
than a camouflage for eugenics or “voluntary eugenics” as British philosophy
professor Philip Kitcher labeled it.
Watson’s advocacy of genetic engineering stretched to his call for the
“really stupid” bottom 10% of people to be “cured”.
Watson even urged woman to be given carte blanche to abort babies should
tests determine that they are likely to be homosexual, despite the vast body
of evidence indicating homosexuality is a result of environment rather than
genetic code.
The geneticist has gone so far as to promote the idea of creating a kind of
Nazi super-race, where the attractive and physically strong are genetically
manufactured under laboratory conditions.
“People say it would be terrible if we made
all girls pretty. I think it would be great,” said Watson.
Dr. Erik Pianka’s doomsday warning of the
population bomb, for which he presented no evidence whatsoever, is complete
pseudo-science.
Populations in developed countries are declining
and only in third world countries are they expanding dramatically.
Industrialization itself levels out population trends and aside from this,
world population models routinely show that the earth’s population will
level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that.
“The population of the most developed
countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050,”
states a United Nations report.
Conservation International’s own study revealed
that 46% of the earth’s surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land
areas not including sea.
Think about the magnitude of Pianka’s statements. He wants to kill nine out
of every ten members of your family and he wants to kill them in one of the
most painful and agonizing ways imaginable.
If Pianka, or ‘The Lizard Man’ as he likes to be called, is so vehement in
embracing the necessity of culling the human population, will he step forward
to be the first one in line? Will he sacrifice his children for the
so-called greater good of the planet? We somehow doubt it.
Will the students and other top academics who so enthusiastically greeted
his ideas go home and kill themselves for the cause if it is so righteous?
It was noted how Pianka presented his argument with the kind of glee that
you would see in a demented serial killer before dispatching his victim.
This is an attitude we have encountered again and again. To discuss killing
90% of the world’s population via a horrific plague is sick enough within
itself but you would at least expect its advocates to be serious and sober
in their approach to the subject.
The opposite seems to be the case, where the
subject is aired in a context of lighthearted lip-smacking and hand-rubbing
as if the individual was about to sink his teeth into a T-bone steak.
This window gives us a clear view of exactly why these deranged bastards
encompass this ideology. They love death and their lives are motivated by
dark influences very different to you or I.
Throughout history, elites have invented justifications for barbaric
practices as a cover for their true agenda of absolute power and control
over populations.
More Examples Of
Population Reduction & Eugenics
From 1932 until 1972, the
Tuskegee Study Group (pictured below) deliberately
infected poor black communities in Alabama with syphilis without their
consent and withheld treatment as the diseased rampaged through the town
killing families.
In 1951 the Israeli government used US government provided technology to
irradiate 100,000 Jewish children in a mass atomic experiment with an entire
generation of Sephardi youths used as guinea pigs.
6,000 died immediately
after the experiments and the rest suffered for the rest of their lives with
debilitating illnesses and cancer. As we have documented, members of the elite are
quite open in their feverish lust to commit mass murder and ethnic
cleansing.
In the foreword to his biography If I Were An
Animal, Prince Philip, another closet Nazi, wrote,
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I
would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something
to solve overpopulation.”
This is just one of many on the record
statements where Prince Philip has advocated his desire to “cull” the
surplus human population. In another speech, he even lambasted the fact that
lives were saved in Sri Lanka through Malaria treatments because it meant
there were three times as many mouths to feed.
One of the most chilling admissions of the elitists’ deadly intent to
forcibly commit genocide to reduce global population came from the lips of
the late Jacques Cousteau, the sainted environmental icon.
In an interview with the UNESCO Courier for
November 1991 the famed oceanographer said:
“The damage people cause to the planet is a
function of demographics - it is equal to the degree of development. One
American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshis. The
damage is directly linked to consumption. Our society is turning toward
more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to
cancer….”
“This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world
population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible
thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.”
It is important to stress that this essay merely
scratches the surface of both the stated goals of global population
reduction from elitists and insiders, along with concrete examples of these
programs being carried out.
We could not possibly list them all in one
article because this would take a book the length of an encyclopedia.
Further information is covered in
Alex Jones’s Endgame, a pertinent segment
from which can be viewed below.