by Hesh Goldstain
September 13, 2014
republished April 27, 2021
of the warnings presented in this post (from 2014) are
no longer a 'Conspiracy Theory'… they are being
implemented step by step, which is easily noticeable as
the reality today (2020-2021).
Notice how nearly all the points in the chapter below
match exactly the
World Economic Forum agenda
In the continuing saga of Dr.
Richard Day's 1969 explicit
depiction of how the world's population would be controlled and
reduced, bear in mind that these are not the ramblings of a singular
lunatic but the conspiracy imposed upon us by the rich and famous in
an effort to have more of the Earth's resources at their disposal.
As you read this and much
more to follow, see how much as already been implemented.
The key is to remain as healthy as possible so as to not be
subjected to synthetic chemical drugs, vaccines, the medical
profession, poisonous and health debilitating
GMOs, the large and major food
companies that contribute heavily to defeat GMO labeling bills, the
bought and paid for mainstream media, and of course our elected
politicians that have lost sight of a government of, for, and by the
The Ultimate Conspiracy
About a year ago or so I wrote and article about the
New World Order implementation and
the eugenics plan.
This plan was let out of
the closet, so to speak, by Dr.
who was a Professor of Pediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical School
in New York.
He also served as Medical
Director of Planned Parenthood Federation of America and was
a profound atheist and an insider of the New World Order.
Dr. Day gave a lecture to the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society in 1969
where he let the hushed cat out of the bag.
His lecture was taped
and those tapes were finally transcribed (far below).
Basically, the agenda is
to corrupt morality, encourage unrestricted sense gratification, and
eliminate or ridicule religiosity, spirituality, common sense, and
the concept of right or wrong.
As I have a copy of those tape transcriptions I will endeavor to
share them with you so you can see the realities that have come and
will continue to come our way. It will be up to each and every one
of us to pick a side. There is no middle road.
How we conduct ourselves
and what we impart to our children and loved ones will determine our
integrity one way or another.
So, in this article, I will simply list the agendas to be followed
in forthcoming articles with more elaboration.
Suffice it to say that the powers to be want our world to go to hell
in a handbasket so they can dictate activity, consciousness, and
work toward ultimate control over each and every one of us.
The introduction to Dr. Day's lecture began with:
"Is there a power, a
force or a group of men organizing and directing change?
Everything is in place and nobody can stop us now.
People will have to
get used to change".
The real and stated goals
are as follows:
purpose of sex - sex without reproduction and reproduction
universally available to all
Sex education as
a tool of world government
abortion as population control
homosexuality as a means of population control
diminish in importance
the "demise pill"
to affordable medical care makes eliminating the elderly
control over medicine
New difficult to
diagnose and untreatable diseases
cancer cures as a means of population control
attacks as a form of assassination
Education as a
tool for accelerating the onset of puberty and evolution
religions. The old religions will have to go
Bible through revisions of key words
The churches will
education as a tool of indoctrination
More time in
schools, but not learning anything
has access to information
Schools as the
hub of the community
Some books would
just disappear from the libraries
abuse to create a jungle atmosphere
The need for more
jails and using hospitals as jails
No more security
Crime used to
American industrial pre-eminence
populations and economies - tearing social roots
Sports as a tool
of social change
Sex and violence
inculcated through entertainment
restrictions and implanted I.D.s
Food control (my
comment - "hello
(my comment - the
HAARP project and hurricane
Know how people
respond and make them do what you want
implants, and televisions that watch you
Home ownership a
thing of the past
The arrival of
the totalitarian global system
I'm sure by now you are
aware of how much of this has already been implemented.
Below, each of the above topics is explained as to how Dr. Day
presented them. We obviously have more to fight against than the
non-labeling of GMO foods.
The tapes were
recorded and transcribed by Dr.
Lawrence Dunegan, a former student of Dr. Day.
The Plot to
Control and Reduce the Population
NEW DIFFICULT TO
DIAGNOSE AND UNTREATABLE DISEASES
Next heading to talk about is Health and Disease.
He said there would
be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before.
Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable - at
least for along time.
No elaboration was
made on this, but I remember, not long after hearing this
presentation, when I had a puzzling diagnosis to make, I would
"is this was what
he was talking about? Is this a case of what he was talking
Some years later, as
AIDS ultimately developed, I think AIDS was at least one example
of what he was talking about.
I now think that AIDS
probably was a manufactured disease.
CANCER CURES AS A MEANS OF POPULATION CONTROL
"We can cure
almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the
Rockefeller Institute, if it's ever decided that it should
But consider - if
people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become
overpopulated. You may as well die of cancer as something
Efforts at cancer
treatment would be geared more toward comfort than toward cure.
There was some
statement that ultimately the cancer cures which were being
hidden in the Rockefeller Institute would come to light because
independent researchers might bring them out, despite these
efforts to suppress them.
But at least for the
time being, letting people die of cancer was a good thing to do
because it would slow down the problem of overpopulation.
HEART ATTACKS AS A FORM OF ASSASSINATION
Another very interesting thing was heart attacks.
"There is now a
way to simulate a real heart attack. It can be used as a
means of assassination."
Only a very skilled
pathologist who knew exactly what to look for at an autopsy,
could distinguish this from the real thing. I thought that was a
very surprising and shocking thing to hear from this particular
man at that particular time.
This, and the
business of the cancer cure, really still stand out sharply in
my memory, because they were so shocking and, at that time,
seemed to me out of character.
He then went on to
talk about nutrition and exercise sort of in the same framework.
People would not have to .. people would have to eat right and
exercise right to live as long as before. Most won't. This in
the connection of nutrition, there was no specific statement
that I can recall as to particular nutrients that would be
either inadequate or in excess.
In retrospect, I tend
to think he meant high salt diets and high fat diets would
predispose toward high blood pressure and premature
arteriosclerotic heart disease.
And that if people
who were too dumb or too lazy to exercise as they should then
their dietary .. their circulating fats go up and predispose to
And he said something
about diet information - about proper diet - would be widely
available, but most people, particularly stupid people, who had
no right to continue living anyway, they would ignore the advice
and just go on and eat what was convenient and tasted good.
There were some other
unpleasant things said about food. I just can't recall what they
were. But I do remember of .. having reflections about wanting
to plant a garden in the backyard to get around whatever these
contaminated foods would be. I regret I don't remember the
details .. the rest of this .. about nutrition and hazardous
nutrition. With regard to Exercise.
He went on to say
that more people would be exercising more, especially running,
because everybody can run. You don't need any special equipment
or place. You can run wherever you are.
As he put it,
"people will be
running all over the place."
And in this vein, he
pointed out how supply produces demand.
And this was in
reference to athletic clothing and equipment. As this would be
made more widely available and glamorized, particularly as
regards running shoes, this would stimulate people to develop an
interest in running and .. as part of a whole sort of public
propaganda campaign. People would be encouraged then to buy the
attractive sports equipment and to get into exercise. Again ..
well in connection with nutrition he also mentioned that public
eating places would rapidly increase.
That .. this had a
connection with the family too. As more and more people eat out,
eating at home would become less important. People would be less
dependent on their kitchens at home. And then this also
connected to convenience foods being made widely available -
things like you could pop into the microwave. Whole meals would
be available pre-fixed.
And of course. we've
now seen this... and some pretty good ones. But this whole
different approach to eating out and to .. previously prepared
meals being eaten in the home was predicted at that time to be
brought about - convenience foods. The convenience foods would
be part of the hazards.
Anybody who was lazy
enough to want the convenience foods rather than fixing his own
also had better be energetic enough to exercise. Because if he
was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food, then
he didn't deserve to live very long. This was all presented as
sort of a moral judgment about people and what they should do
with their energies.
People who are smart,
who would learn about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough
to eat right and exercise right are better people - and the kind
you want to live longer.
AS A TOOL FOR ACCELERATING THE ONSET OF PUBERTY AND EVOLUTION
Somewhere along in here there was also something about
accelerating the onset of puberty.
And this was said in
connection with health, and later in connection with education,
and connecting to accelerating the process of evolutionary
There was a statement
"we think that we
can push evolution faster and in the direction we want it to
I remember this only
as a general statement. I don't recall if any details were given
ALL RELIGIONS…THE OLD RELIGIONS WILL HAVE TO GO
Another area of discussion was Religion. This is an avowed
And he said,
"Religion is not
necessarily bad. A lot of people seem to need religion, with
it's mysteries and rituals - so they will have religion. But
the major religions of today have to be changed because they
are not compatible with the changes to come.
The old religions
will have to go. Especially Christianity. Once the Roman
Catholic Church is brought down, the rest of Christianity
will follow easily.
Then a new
religion can be accepted for use all over the world. It will
incorporate something from all of the old ones to make it
more easy for people to accept it, and feel at home in it.
Most people won't be too concerned with religion.
They will realize
that they don't need it."
THE BIBLE THROUGH REVISIONS OF KEY WORDS
In order to do this, the Bible will be changed. It will be
rewritten to fit the new religion.
Gradually, key words
will be replaced with new words having various shades of
meaning. Then the meaning attached to the new word can be close
to the old word - and as time goes on, other shades of meaning
of that word can be emphasized and then gradually that word
replaced with another word.
I don't know if I'm
making that clear. But the idea is that everything in Scripture
need not be rewritten, just key words replaced by other words.
And the variability
in meaning attached to any word can be used as a tool to change
the entire meaning of Scripture, and therefore make it
acceptable to this new religion.
Most people won't
know the difference; and this was another one of the times where
"the few who do
notice the difference won't be enough to matter."
CHURCHES WILL HELP US!"
Then followed one of the most surprising statements of the whole
"Some of you
probably think the Churches won't stand for this," and he
went on to say, "the churches will help us!"
There was no
elaboration on this, it was unclear just what he had in mind
when he said, "the churches will help us!"
In retrospect I think
some of us now can understand what he might have meant at that
I recall then only of
thinking, "no they won't!" and remembering our Lord's words
where he said to Peter,
"Thou art Peter
and upon this rock I will build my Church, and gates of Hell
will not prevail against it."
So .. yes, some
people in the Churches might help. And in the subsequent 20
years we've seen how some people in Churches have helped. But we
also know that our Lord's Words will stand, and the gates of
Hell will not prevail.
RESTRUCTURING EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF INDOCTRINATION
Another area of discussion was Education.
And one of the
things; in connection with education that remember connecting
with what he said about religion was in addition to changing the
Bible he said that the classics in Literature would be changed.
I seem to recall Mark Twain's writings was given as one example.
But he said, the
casual reader reading a revised version of a classic would never
even suspect that there was any change. And, somebody would have
to go through word by word to even recognize that any change was
made in these classics, the changes would be so subtle.
But the changes would
be such as to promote the acceptability of the new system.
IN SCHOOLS, BUT THEY "WOULDN'T LEARN ANYTHING."
As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more
time in schools, but in many schools they wouldn't learn
They'll learn some
things, but not as much as formerly. Better schools in better
areas with better people - their kids will learn more. In the
better schools learning would be accelerated.
And this is another
time where he said,
"We think we can
By pushing kids to
learn more he seemed to be suggesting that their brains would
evolve, that their offspring would evolve .. sort of pushing
evolution .. where kids would learn and be more intelligent at a
younger age. As if this pushing would alter their physiology.
Overall, schooling would be prolonged.
This meant prolonged
through the school year.
I'm not sure what he
said about a long school day, I do remember he said that school
was planned to go all summer, that the summer school vacation
would become a thing of the past. Not only for schools, but for
People would begin to
think of vacation times year round, not just in the summer. For
most people it would take longer to complete their education. To
get what originally had been in a bachelor's program would now
require advanced degrees and more schooling. So that a lot of
school time would be just wasted time.
Good schools would
become more competitive. I inferred when he said that, that he
was including all schools - elementary up through college - but
I don't recall whether he said that. Students would have to
decide at a younger age what they would want to study and get
onto their track early, if they would qualify.
It would be harder to
change to another field of study once you get started. Studies
would be concentrated in much greater depth, but narrowed. You
wouldn't have access to material in other fields, outside your
own area of study, without approval.
This seem to be more
.. where he talked about limited access to other fields .. I
seem to recall that as being more at the college level. high
school and college level, perhaps. People would be very
specialized in their own area of expertise.
But they won't be
able to get a broad education and won't be able to understand
what is going on overall.
WHO HAS ACCESS TO INFORMATION
He was already talking about computers in education, and at that
time he said anybody who wanted computer access, or access to
books that were not directly related to their field of study
would have to have a very good reason for so doing.
would be denied.
SCHOOLS AS THE HUB
OF THE COMMUNITY
Another angle was that the schools would become more important
in people's overall life.
Kids in addition to
their academics would have to get into school activities unless
they wanted to feel completely out of it. But spontaneous
activities among kids.. the thing that came to my mind when I
heard this was - sand lot football and sand lot baseball teams
that we worked up as kids growing up.
I said the kids
wanting any activities outside of school would be almost forced
to get them through the school.
There would be few
Now the pressures of
the accelerated academic program, the accelerated demands, where
kids would feel they had to be part of something - one or
another athletic club or some school activity - these pressures
he recognized would cause some students to burn out.
ones will learn how to cope with pressures and to survive.
There will be some help available to students in handling
stress, but the unfit won't be able to make it. They will
then move on to other things."
In this connection
and later on in the connection with drug abuse and alcohol abuse
he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be
In all the pushing
for achievement, it was recognized that many people would need
help, and the people worth keeping around would be able to
accept and benefit from that help, and still be super achievers.
Those who could not
would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable
- "expendable" I guess is the word I want.
Education would be
lifelong. Adults would be going to school. There'll always be
new information that adults must have to keep up. When you can't
keep up anymore, you're too old. This was another way of letting
older people know that the time had come for them to move on and
take the demise pill.
If you got too tired
to keep up with your education, or you got too old to learn new
information, then this was a signal - you begin to prepare to
get ready to step aside.
WOULD JUST DISAPPEAR FROM THE LIBRARIES…"
In addition to revising the classics, which I alluded to awhile
ago .. with revising the Bible, he said,
"some books would
just disappear from the libraries."
This was in the vein
that some books contain information or contain ideas that should
not be kept around. And therefore, those books would disappear.
I don't remember exactly if he said how this was to be
accomplished. But I seem to recall carrying away this idea that
this would include thefts.
That certain people
would be designated to go to certain libraries and pick up
certain books and just get rid of them. Not necessarily as a
matter of policy - just simply steal it. Further down the line,
not everybody will be allowed to own books.
And some books nobody
will be allowed to own.
Another area of discussion was laws that would be changed. At
that time a lot of States had blue laws about Sunday sales,
certain Sunday activities. He said the blue laws [Sunday laws]
would all be repealed.
Gambling laws would
be repeated or relaxed, so that gambling would be increased. He
indicated then that governments would get into gambling. We've
had a lot of state lotteries pop up around the country since
And, at the time, we
were already being told that would be the case.
"Why should all
that gambling money be kept in private hands when the State
would benefit from it?" was the rational behind it.
But people should be
able to gamble if they want to. So it would become a civil
activity, rather than a private, or illegal activity.
Bankruptcy laws would
be changed. I don't remember the details, but just that they
would be. And I know subsequent to that time they have been.
Antitrust laws would
be changed, or be interpreted differently, or both. In
connection with the changing anti-trust laws, there was some
statement that in a sense. competition would be increased. But
this would be increased competition within otherwise controlled
circumstances. So it's not a free competition.
I recall of having
the impression that it was like competition but within members
of a club. There would be nobody outside the club would be able
Sort of like teams
competing within a professional sports league .. if you're the
NFL or the American or National Baseball Leagues - you compete
within the league but the league is all in agreement on what the
rules of competition are - not a really free competition.
ENCOURAGEMENT OF DRUG ABUSE TO CREATE A JUNGLE ATMOSPHERE
Drug use would he increased. Alcohol use would be increased.
efforts against drugs would be increased. On first hearing that
it sounded like a contradiction. Why increase drug abuse and
simultaneously increase law enforcement against drug abuse? But
the idea is that, in part, the increased availability of drugs
would provide a sort of law of the jungle whereby the weak and
the unfit would be selected out.
There was a statement
made at the time:
"Before the earth
was overpopulated, there was a law of the jungle where only
the fittest survived. You had to be able to protect yourself
against the elements and wild animals and disease. And if
you were fit you survived.
But now we've
become so civilized - we're over civilized - and the unfit
are enabled to survive only at the expense of those who are
And the abusive drugs
then, would restore, in a certain sense, the law of the jungle,
and selection of the fittest for survival. News about drug abuse
and law enforcement efforts would tend to keep drugs in the
And would also tend
to reduce this unwarranted American complacency that the world
is a safe place, and a nice place.
The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse would be
both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and
the weak would respond to the promotions and therefore use and
abuse more alcohol.
Drunk driving would
become more of a problem; and stricter rules about driving under
the influence would be established so that more and more people
would lose their privilege to drive.
RESTRICTIONS ON TRAVEL
This also had connection with something we'll get to later about
overall restrictions on travel.
Not everybody should
be free to travel the way they do now in the United States.
People don't have a need to travel that way. It's a privilege!
It was kind of the high-handed the way it was put. Again, much
more in the way of psychological services would be made
available to help those who got hooked on drugs and alcohol.
The idea being, that
in order to promote this - drug and alcohol abuse to screen out
some of the unfit - people who are otherwise are pretty good
also would also be subject to getting hooked. And if they were
really worth their salt they would have enough sense to seek
psychological counseling and to benefit from it.
So this was presented
as sort of a redeeming value on the part of the planners. It was
as if he were saying, "you think we're bad in promoting these
evil things - but look how nice we are - we're also providing a
FOR MORE JAILS, AND USING HOSPITALS AS JAILS
More jails would be needed. Hospitals could serve as jails. Some
new hospital construction would be designed so as to make them
adaptable to jail-like use.
This is the continuation of Dr. Day's lecture in 1969 to finally
speak openly about the "powers" and the "haves" plan to control and
reduce the population.
There is one more part to
finish his heinous, impersonal, atheistic ramblings. Unfortunately,
his ramblings are the plans propagated by the Rockefellers, early,
and to the Gates in modern day.
After presenting his
final criminality I will finish with an epilogue, which will put it
all in perspective and in your hands to deal with.
RESTRICTIONS AND IMPLANTED I.D.
Travel, instead of being easy for old folks, would become very
People would need
permission to travel and they would need a good reason to
travel. If you didn't have a good reason for your travel you
would not be allowed to travel, and everyone would need ID.
This would at first
be an ID card you would carry on your person and you must show
when you are asked for it. It was already planned that later on
some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the
skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual
This would eliminate
the possibility of false ID and also eliminate the possibility
of people saying "Well, I lost my ID."
The difficulty about
these skin implants was that the ID was stated to be getting
material that would stay in or under the skin without causing
foreign body reaction whereby the body would reject it or cause
infection, and that this would have to be material on which
information could be recorded and retrieved by some sort of
scanner while it was not rejected by the body. Silicon was
mentioned. Silicon at that time was thought to be well
It was used to
augment breasts. Women who felt their breasts were too small
would get silicon implants, and I guess that still goes on.
At any rate silicon
was seen at that time as the promising material to do both: to
be retained in the body without rejection and to be able to
retain information retrievable by electronic means.
Food supplies would come under tight control. If population
growth didn't slow down, food shortages could be created in a
hurry and people would realize the dangers of overpopulation.
the population slows down or not the food supply is to be
brought under centralized control so that people would have
enough to be well-nourished but they would not have enough to
support any fugitive from the new system. In other words, if you
had a friend or relative who didn't sign on, and growing ones
own food would be outlawed.
This would be done
under some sort of pretext. In the beginning I mentioned there
were two purposes for everything - one the ostensible purpose
and one the real purpose, - and the ostensible purpose here
would be that growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would
spread disease or something like that.
So the acceptable
idea was to protect the consumer but the real idea was to limit
the food supply and growing your own food would be illegal.
And if you persist in
illegal activities like growing your own food, then you're a
There was a mention then of weather. This was another really
"We can or soon
will be able to control the weather."
"I'm not merely
referring to dropping iodide crystals into the clouds to
precipitate rain that's already there, but REAL control."
And weather was seen
as a weapon of war, a weapon of influencing public policy (does
the HAARP project ring a bell?). It could make rain or withhold
rain in order to influence certain areas and bring them under
your control. There were two sides to this that were rather
"On the one hand
you can make drought during the growing season so that
nothing will grow, and on the other hand you can make for
very heavy rains during harvest season so the fields are too
muddy to bring in the harvest, and indeed one might be able
to do both."
There was no
statement how this would be done. It was stated that either it
was already possible or very, very close to being possible.
He said that very few people really know how government works.
Something to the
effect that elected officials are influenced in ways that they
don't even realize and they carry out plans that have been made
for them and they think that they are authors of the plans.
But actually they are
manipulated in ways they don't understand.
PEOPLE RESPOND - MAKING THEM DO WHAT YOU WANT
Somewhere in the presentation he made two statements that I want
to insert at this time. I don't remember just where they were
made, but they're valid in terms of the general overall view.
"People can carry
in their minds and act upon two contradictory ideas at one
time, provided that these two contradictory ideas are kept
far enough apart."
And the other
"You can know
pretty well how rational people are going to respond to
certain circumstances or to certain information that they
So, to determine
the response you want you need only control the kind of data
or information that they're presented or the kinds of
circumstance that they're in; and being rational people
they'll do what you want them to do.
They may not
fully understand what they're doing or why."
Somewhere in this connection, then, was the statement admitting
that some scientific research data could be - and indeed has
been - falsified in order to bring about desired results. And
here was said, "People don't ask the right questions. Some
people are too trusting."
Now this was an
interesting statement because the speaker and the audience all
being doctors of medicine and supposedly very objectively,
dispassionately scientific and science being the be all and
end-all... well to falsify scientific research data in that
setting is like blasphemy in the church... you just don't do
Anyhow, out of all of
this was to come the New International Governing Body, probably
to come through the U.N . and with a World Court, but not
necessarily through those structures. It could be brought about
in other ways. Acceptance of the U.N . at that time was seen as
not being as wide as was hoped. Efforts would continue to give
the United Nations increasing importance.
People would be more
and more used to the idea of relinquishing some national
sovereignty. Economic interdependence would foster this goal
from a peaceful standpoint. Avoidance of war would foster it
from the standpoint of worrying about hostilities. It was
recognized that doing it peaceably was better than doing it by
war. It was stated at this point that war was "obsolete."
I thought that was an
interesting phrase because obsolete means something that once
was seen as useful is no longer useful. But war is obsolete...
this being because of the nuclear bombs war is no longer
controllable. Formerly wars could be controlled, but if nuclear
weapons would fall into the wrong hands there could be an
unintended nuclear disaster. It was not stated who the "wrong
We were free to infer
that maybe this meant terrorists, but in more recent years I'm
wondering whether the wrong hands might also include people that
we've assumed that they've had nuclear weapons all along...
maybe they don't have them. Just as it was stated that industry
would be preserved in the United States - a little bit just in
case the world wide plans didn't work out; just in case some
country or some other powerful person decided to bolt from the
pack and go his own way, one wonders whether this might also be
true with nuclear weapons.
When you hear that...
he said they might fall into the wrong hands, there was some
statement that the possession of nuclear weapons had been
tightly controlled, sort of implying that anybody who had
nuclear weapons was intended to have them. That would
necessarily have included the Soviet Union, if indeed they have
them. But I recall wondering at the time, "Are you telling us,
or are you implying that this country willingly gave weapons to
At that time that
seemed like a terribly unthinkable thing to do, much less to
The leaders of the
Soviet Union seem to be so dependent on the West though, one
wonders whether there may have been some fear that they would
try to assert independence if they indeed had these weapons. So,
I don't know. It's something to speculate about perhaps... Who
did he mean when he said, "If these weapons fall into the wrong
terrorists. Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not
by peaceful cooperation - everybody willingly yielding national
sovereignty - then by bringing the nation to the brink of
nuclear war. And everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is
created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a
strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people
would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve
peace, and thereby this would bring in the New International
This was stated and
very impressive thing to hear then... "If there were too many
people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a
need to use one or two - possibly more - nuclear weapons. As it
was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that
"We mean business." That was followed by the statement that, "By
the time one or two of those went off then everybody - even the
most reluctant - would yield."
He said something
about "this negotiated peace would be very convincing", as kind
of in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was
rehearsed but nobody would know it. People hearing about it
would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between
hostile enemies who finally had come to the realization that
peace was better than war.
In this context
discussing war, and war is obsolete, a statement was made that
there were some good things about war... one, you're going to
die anyway, and people sometimes in war get a chance to display
great courage and heroism and if they die they've died well and
if they survive they get recognition.
So that in any case,
the hardships of war on soldiers are worth it because that's the
reward they get out of their warring. Another justification
expressed for war was, if you think of the many millions of
casualties in WWI and WWII, well. suppose all those people had
not died but had continued to live, then continued to have
There would be
millions upon millions and we would already be overpopulated, so
those two great wars served a benign purpose in delaying
over-population. But now there are technological means for the
individual and governments to control over-population so in this
regard war is obsolete.
It's no longer
needed. And then again it's obsolete because nuclear weapons
could destroy the whole universe. War, which once was
controllable, could get out of control and so for these two
reasons it's now obsolete.
There was a discussion of terrorism.
Terrorism would be
used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism
at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United
States. It could become necessary in the United States if the
United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the
But at least in the
foreseeable future it was not planned. And very benignly on
their part. Maybe terrorism would not be required here, but the
implication being that it would be indeed used if it was
Along with this came
a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway
and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans
that the world is indeed a dangerous place... or can be if we
don't relinquish control to the proper authorities.
There was discussion of money and banking. One statement was,
"Inflation is infinite. You can put an infinite number of zeros
after any number and put the decimals points wherever you want",
as an indication that inflation is a tool of the controllers.
Money would become
predominately credit. It was already... money is primarily a
credit thing but exchange of money would be not cash or palpable
things but electronic credit signal. People would carry money
only in very small amounts for things like chewing gum and candy
bars. Just pocket sorts of things.
Any purchase of any
significant amount would be done electronically. Earnings would
be electronically entered into your account. It would be a
single banking system.
May have the
appearance of being more than one but ultimately and basically
it would be one single banking system, so that when you got paid
your pay would be entered for you into your account balance and
then when you purchased anything at the point of purchase it
would be deducted from your account balance and you would
actually carry nothing with you.
Also computer records
can be kept on whatever it was you purchased so that if you were
purchasing too much of any particular item and some official
wanted to know what you were doing with your money they could go
back and review your purchases and determine what you were
There was a statement
that any purchase of significant size like an automobile,
bicycle, a refrigerator, a radio or television or whatever might
have some sort of identification on it so it could be traced, so
that very quickly anything which was either given away or stolen
- whatever - authorities would be able to establish who
purchased it and when.
Computers would allow
this to happen. The ability to save would be greatly curtailed.
People would just not
be able to save any considerable degree of wealth. There was
some statement of recognition that wealth represents power and
wealth in the hands of a lot of people is not good for the
people in charge so if you save too much you might be taxed. The
more you save the higher rate of tax on your savings so your
savings really could never get very far.
And also if you began
to show a pattern of saving too much you might have your pay
cut. We would say, "Well, your saving instead of spending. You
really don't need all that money."
That basically the
idea being to prevent people from accumulating any wealth which
might have long range disruptive influence on the system. People
would be encouraged to use credit to borrow and then also be
encouraged to renege on their debt so they would destroy their
The idea here is
that, again, if you're too stupid to handle credit wisely, this
gives the authorities the opportunity to come down hard on you
once you've shot your credit. Electronic payments initially
would all be based on different kinds of credit cards... these
were already in use in 1969 to some extent. Not as much as now.
But people would have
credit cards with the electronic strip on it and once they got
used to that then it would be pointed out the advantage of
having all of that combined into a single credit card, serving a
single monetary system and then they won't have to carry around
all that plastic.
SURVEILLANCE, IMPLANTS, AND TELEVISIONS THAT WATCH YOU
So the next step would be the single card and then the next step
would be to replace the single card with a skin implant.
The single card could
be lost or stolen, give rise to problems; could be exchanged
with somebody else to confuse identify. The skin implant on the
other hand would be not losable or counterfeitable or
transferrable to another person so you and your accounts would
be identified without any possibility of error.
And the skin implants
would have to be put some place that would be convenient to the
skin; for example your right hand or your forehead. At that time
when I heard this I was unfamiliar with the statements in the
Book of Revelation. The speaker went on to say, "Now some of you
people who read the Bible will attach significance to this to
the Bible," but he went on to disclaim any Biblical significance
at all. This is just common sense of how the system could work
and should work and there's no need to read any superstitious
Biblical principals into it.
As I say, at the time
I was not very familiar with the words of Revelations. Shortly
after I became familiar with it and the significance of what he
said really was striking. I'll never forget it. There was some
mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to
surveillance by providing radio signals.
This could be under
the skin or a dental implant... put in like a filling so that
either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified
by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could
be located at any time or any place by any authority that wanted
to find him. This would be particularly useful for somebody who
broke out of prison. There was more discussion of personal
One more thing was
said, "You'll be watching television and somebody will be
watching you at the same time at a central monitoring station."
Television sets would have a device to enable this. The T.V. set
would not have to be on in order for this to be operative.
Also, the television
set can be used to monitor what you are watching. People can
tell what you're watching on TV and how you're reacting to what
you're watching. And you would not know that you were being
watched while you were watching your television. How would we
get people to accept these things into their homes? Well, people
would buy them when they buy their own television.
They won't know that
they're on there at first. This was described by being what we
now know as Cable TV to replace the antenna TV. When you buy a
TV set this monitor would just be part of the set and most
people would not have enough knowledge to know it was there in
the beginning. And then the cable would be the means of carrying
the surveillance message to the monitor. By the time people
found out that this monitoring was going on, they would also be
very dependent upon television for a number of things.
Just the way people
are dependent upon the telephone today. One thing the television
would be used for would be purchases. You wouldn't have to leave
your home to purchase. You just turn on your TV and there would
be a way of interacting with your television channel to the
store that you wanted to purchase.
And you could flip
the switch from place to place to choose a refrigerator or
clothing. This would be both convenient, but it would also make
you dependent on your television so the built-in monitor would
be something you could not do without. There was some discussion
of audio monitors, too, just in case the authorities wanted to
hear what was going on in rooms other than where the television
monitor was, and in regard to this the statement was made,
Any wire that
went into your house, for example your telephone wire, could
be used this way.
I remember this in
particular because it was fairly near the end of the
presentation and as we were leaving the meeting place I said
something to one of my colleagues about going home and pulling
all of the wires out of my house.. except I knew I couldn't get
by without the telephone.
And the colleague I
spoke to just seemed numb. To this day I don't think he even
remembers what we talked about or what we hear that time, cause
I've asked him. But at that time he seemed stunned. Before all
these changes would take place with electronic monitoring, it
was mentioned that there would be service trucks all over the
place, working on the wires and putting in new cables.
This is how people
who were on the inside would know how things were progressing.
OWNERSHIP A THING OF THE PAST
Privately owned housing would become a thing of the past. The
cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so
high that most people couldn't afford it. People who already
owned their houses would be allowed to keep them but as years go
by it would be more and more difficult for young people to buy a
Young people would
more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or
condominiums. More and more unsold houses would stand vacant.
People just couldn't buy them. But the cost of housing would not
come down. You'd right away think, well the vacant house, the
price would come down, the people would buy it.
But there was some
statement to the effect that the price would be held high even
though there were many available so that free market places
would not operate. People would not be able to buy these and
gradually more and more of the population would be forced into
small apartments. Small apartments, which would not accommodate
very many children.
Then as the number of
real homeowners diminished they would become a minority. There
would be no sympathy for them from the majority who dwelled in
the apartments and then these homes could be taken by increased
taxes or other regulations that would be detrimental to home
ownership and would be acceptable to the majority.
would be assigned where they would live and it would be common
to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your
not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all
be under the control of a central housing authority.
Have this in mind in
1990 when they ask,
bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do
you have a finished game room?."
This information is
personal and is of no national interest to government under our
existing Constitution. But you'll be asked those questions and
decide how you want to respond to them.
OF THE TOTALITARIAN GLOBAL SYSTEM
When the new system takes over people will be expected to sign
allegiance to it, indicating that they don't have any
reservations or holding back to the old system.
"There just won't
be any room", he said, "for people who won't go along. We
can't have such people cluttering up the place so such
people would be taken to special places".
And here I don't
remember the exact words, but the inference I drew was that at
these special places where they were taken, then they would not
live very long. He may have said something like, "disposed of
humanely", but I don't remember very precisely... just the
impression the system was not going to support them when they
would not go along with the system.
That would leave
death as the only alternative. Somewhere in this vein he said
there would not be any martyrs. When I first heard this I
thought it meant the people would not be killed, but as the
presentation developed what he meant was they would not be
killed in such a way or disposed of in such a way that they
could serve as inspiration to other people the way martyrs do.
Rather he said something like this. "People will just
Just a few additional
items sort of thrown in here in the end which I failed to
include where they belong more perfectly. One: The bringing in
of the new system he said probably would occur on a weekend in
the winter. Everything would shut down on Friday evening and
Monday morning when everybody wakened there would be an
announcement that the New System was in place.
During the process in
getting the United States ready for these changes everybody
would be busier with less leisure time and less opportunity to
really look about and see what was going on around them.
Also, there would be
more changes and more difficulty in keeping up as far as one's
investments. Investment instruments would be changing. Interest
rates would be changing so that it would be a difficult job with
keeping up with what you had already earned. Interesting about
automobiles; it would look as though there were many varieties
of automobiles, but when you look very closely there would be
They would be made to
look different with chrome and wheel covers and this sort of
thing, but looking closely one would see that the same
automobile was made by more than one manufacturer. This recently
was brought down to me when I was in a parking lot and saw a
small Ford - I forget the model - and a small Japanese
automobile which were identical except for a number of things
like the number of holes in the wheel cover and the chrome
around the plate and the shape of the grill. But if you looked
at the basic parts of the automobile, they were identical.
They just happened to
be parked side-by-side where I was struck with this and I was
again reminded of what had been said many years ago. I'm
hurrying here because I'm just about to the end of the tape.
Let me just summarize
her by saying, all of these things said by one individual at one
time in one place relating to so many different human endeavors
and then to look and see how many of these actually came
about... that is changes accomplished between then and now [1969
- 1988] and the things which are planned for the future, I think
there is no denying that this is controlled and there is indeed
The question then becomes what to do?
I think first off, we
must put our faith in God and pray and ask for his guidance. And
secondly do what we can to inform other individuals as much as
possible, as much as they may be interested. Some people just
don't care, because they're preoccupied with getting along in
their own personal endeavors.
But as much as
possible I think we should try to inform other people who may be
interested, and again... put our faith and trust in God and pray
constantly for his guidance and for the courage to accept what
we may be facing in the near future. Rather than accept peace
and justice, which we hear of so much now... it's a cliché.
Let's insist on
liberty and justice for all.
The Plot to
Control and Reduce the Population - Epilogue
First and foremost, what Dr. Day spoke openly about in 1969 started
in Hitler's day.
Despite his losing the
I.G. Farben and other "haves"
decided to push forward.
Twenty-two years after
Dr. Day's lecture, which would be in 1991, two of Day's buddies,
Randy Engel and Dr. Lawrence Dunegan had a chat about it. After
their thoughts we'll get to modern day atrocities.
When discussing cancer cures they talked about numerous cancer cures
sitting at the Rockefeller Institute and withheld from the public
and the medical profession.
While Dr. Day spoke about
this, he also said,
"You will forget most
or much of what I'm going to tell you tonight".
Why would they forget? Do
you think a huge sumptuous meal and unlimited alcohol would have
anything to do with that? Even then people were dumbed down.
When talking about
changing the image of the doctor it was to turn them into a
high-paid technician rather than a professional who exercises
independent judgment on behalf of his independent patient.
Looking at today's
physician, for the most part you see a "hooker" for the Big pHarma
"pimp" treating a symptom endlessly with toxic, synthetic chemicals
instead of trying to dig for the cure. And what does this lifetime
of filling the body with endless toxic chemicals do? It shortens the
Then they compared the
Americans to the Europeans and said that the Americans were too
trusting and never ask the right questions while the Europeans were
more skeptical and more sophisticated.
The Americans had a lack
of discernment and were easily tricked because they were too
trusting. In other words, if you want someone to do something and
you know that initially he might balk at it because it's against his
morals or religious beliefs, you have to substitute another reason
that will be acceptable.
And then, after he
accepts it, it will be a done deal and there would be no turning
In this vein, look how
quickly so-called AIDS education was introduced and ultimately
accepted. If a group wanted to introduce the concept of sodomy or
initiate sex earlier and earlier in children and that was the reason
given, most parents would not go for it. So, you change the reason
and it's accepted.
And the new reason was to
protect the children from AIDS. So now that education is available
from K to 12 grades. But, it is a great boon to the homosexual
network because they now have access to the kids from their earliest
You see, the emphasis on
youth was stated explicitly because people beyond a certain age are
set in their ways and they are not likely to change or discard their
But the kids are pliable
and can be molded in any direction you want to point them in. So,
you target the young because they will be around a lot longer than
the old fogies that will be dying off anyway.
Dr. Day recognized
homosexual activity as a bizarre abnormal behavior, but that
activity was just another element in the law of the jungle because,
"people who are
stupid enough to go along with it are not fit to inhabit the
planet and they will just go by the wayside. And if you are dumb
enough to be convinced by the promotion of homosexuality you
don't deserve a place and we'll be rid of you soon enough. The
people who will survive this are also smart enough not to be
deluded by our propaganda".
The guy was a true
From this promotion of
homosexuality came the concept of downgrading or eliminating God
from the equation altogether.
The concept of not being
able to see Him led to the propaganda of doubting His existence.
After all, since God heartily denounced, rejected and punished
homosexual behavior, if you can Him out of the picture than anything
goes. Wait and see how long it will be before pedophilia emerges big
exists right now
in the Catholic Church. And what
happens when a priest is found to be a pedophile? He is sent to
When Dr. Day attacked
religion, because he was an atheist, he advocated creating "our own
religion", because in doing so they could then define what religion
And their target - the
Roman Catholic Church.
"Once that falls, the
rest of Christianity will be easy".
Along these lines there
was an article in the Honolulu Star Advertiser on November
11, 2013 about a church service in Los Angeles made up of atheists
finding camaraderie without religion.
dovetails with new studies that show an increasing number of
Americans drifting away from any religious affiliation".
The Pew Forum on Religion
& Public Life released a study last year that found 20 percent of
Americans say they have no religious affiliations, which was an
increase from 15 percent in the last five years.
Maybe the concept of
abandoning religious or spiritual values has not encompassed all of
society, but as you can see it is growing. And what fruit does a
Godless society bear? Chaos, control and reduction.
Regarding the Bible, Dr.
Day said the plan was underfoot to change wording. As he put it,
"Words are weapons". An example would be changing the word "alter"
to "table" or "sacrifice" to "meal". When you change words, you
change ideas and thoughts.
Take the word "gay" for
Years ago it meant
"happy". Today, it's a pervert and never used in any other way. Then
we have "sex education". Is that not just a euphemism for
conditioning? And why was the word "homophobe" created? The answer
That being the case, why
has the word "heterophobe" never been used in the mainstream media?
"Pimps. Hookers and
Let's look at the reason
for promoting abortion: when you kill them off early you will left
with "oldies" that will die sooner with fewer behind them. Does this
not blend in perfectly with population reduction?
So the concept of sex without reproduction was greatly emphasized.
Hello birth control pills, abortions at will, and sense enjoyment "ubber
Hitler said, "Deutchland
ubber alles" (Germany over all others).
Now it's sex over
The subject of population control was easily solved. The use of
microchips solved that issue. By implanting microchips population
control is simplified. Everything about an individual will be
Their money, their sex
lives, their contacts, their thoughts will be made available for the
Try to buck the system
and your plug gets pulled. At that point you will have no life. But
the "haves" will be exempt from that and will have their privacy
reserved. No one else!
When it comes to music the young and the old have different tastes.
The old like it quiet and the young like it loud and busy. The
problem that this creates is turmoil in the family because of the
sound variations in the house. So, in rebellion the youth take to
the streets or vacate the house causing family dissention and
To implement these changes the "New Authority" would have to present
itself and its ideas.
What better time than in
the winter on a weekend. The reason for this is that in the winter
people are less apt to travel and on the weekend government agencies
are closed making it so no one would be able to question anything.
Also, an agreement would
have to be signed. Sign and you're good. Don't sign any you will get
any electrical impulses in your bank accounts, no impulses to pay
your electric bills or your mortgage or buy food. So, when the
impulses are gone, so is your livelihood and means of existence.
Your expenditures, through electronic surveillance would be tightly
If you spend too much
money at your supermarket someone would come to you and say,
"How come? What are
you doing with all this food? You don't look fat. You don't have
that many people to feed. We know you are not entertaining. What
are you doing with all that food?"
God forbid you reply,
"I have seven people
in my basement who object to the New World Order and I'm feeding
Then you would be told
that they do not belong there and you cannot feed them, and since
you are sympathetic to them maybe your allegiance isn't very
Look what happened in China when they wanted to enforce the "one
child family" concept. All education for the second child was cut
off, and food rations were cut, and if someone found a way around
that the government instituted compulsory abortions and compulsory
plugging in of the IUD's.
In the USA we have Planned Parenthood espousing "freedom of choice".
Really? One of the
medical directors of Planned Parenthood, Dr. Allen Gootmacher,
"Well, if people
limit their families and do what we say, fine. But, if we need
compulsory population control, we're going to have it".
The New World Order is
not supportive of homeless people living in boxes on the street.
In keeping with the
actions of the Nazi's and the Communists, people came in the middle
of the night and by morning all those people were gone. Where did
they go? Don't ask. After all, when a person lives in a box he is
So, a truck comes at
night and removes the litter. If you ask questions you draw
attention to yourself. So, you mind your own business and step over
the starving man on the street who didn't play ball.
I was recently visiting a high school buddy who lived in a
retirement home in New Jersey. I noticed that the exit was
convoluted and not simple. So, here's this little retirement
community with one exit and entrance, no young people, and a hassle
to get out of. Why? Maybe to minimize the times someone leaves so
they stay home longer.
So, for everyone reading this, make sure that your kids see their
grandparents frequently no matter how much that entails. If you see
someone infrequently you forget they exist. If you forget they
exist, love is lost. When that happens and you tell your child
his/her grampa or gramma died, the last thing you want to hear is ,
Back in the late 30's and early 40's, manure was the fertilizer and
the soil, being rich in sulfur, kept people healthy.
The Rockefeller, under
the guise of enabling the farmer to plant more crops and less time
shoveling shit, switched to the petro-chemical fertilizers and
killing all the sulfur in the soil. Illnesses abounded.
Then the food companies got involved and figured out if they could
extend shelf life they could make more profit. This opened the door
to synthetic chemicals being added to the food.
The pharmaceutical industry paid for more advertising and the
mainstream media began running more drug ads in the newspapers and
on television. That was unheard of in the 40's and early 50's.
Enter the biotech industry supplying us with heavily pesticide and
insecticide sprayed foods telling us they were safe. Does anyone
remember the Viet Nam war and the use of Agent Orange, which left
enormous amounts of people dealing with illnesses and kids born with
birth defects for the rest of their lives?
Yet, Monsanto says that
the corn-fields in the U.S. sprayed with 2-4-D, Agent Orange's
active ingredient is safe to eat.
Back in the 50s, fluoride used to be disposed of in lead-lined drums
as a toxic waste product to the tune of millions of dollars a year.
That was easily fixed.
A PR campaign was
undertaken and now it is dumped into the water supply as a dental
cavity panacea and those polluters rake in millions of dollars a
There's a couple of
interesting facts about fluoride:
NYC and Boston
have been fluoridated since the 60's and experience a dental
cavity rate 4 times higher than the national average.
How come no one
spends time teaching people about how to brush and floss the
teeth or how the ingestion of sugar leads to cavities?
In the year 2000,
Hawaii's Dental Chief, Dr. Mark Greer, said on Hawaii Public
Radio that the toxicology tests proved that fluoride was
safe and effective.
The problem with
that statement is that the only independent toxicology
report on fluoride was done by the National Research Council
They found that
fluoride, in excess of .8ppm, was extremely detrimental to
one's health (at present, in addition to fluoride in the
water supply and people ingesting foods sprayed with
fluoridated water, people are getting 8ppm on a daily
In 2003, we had a fluoride hearing in Honolulu. I followed
Dr. Greer in testimony. I said that Dr. Greer was
multi-faceted and that he missed his calling. He should have
been president of the Liar's Club.
I then said I
called our Dental Chief and liar in front of at least 300
people and said that I open a defamation of character
I then asked if
there was a lawyer in the house and if there was, I begged
him to take the case because in trial Dr. Greer would have
to present the toxicology report he referred to, which does
Ten years later, except for the military bases, no fluoride
in Hawaii's water supply and no lawsuit.
So, here we are.
All the things that Dr.
Day spoke about get implemented little by little. But, we have three
things we have no control over and three things we have control
We have no control over
getting old, no control over dying, and no control over karma. What
we have control over is being healthy, being fit, and actually
having a relationship with God.
To be healthy we should adhere to a plant-based diet centered around
organics and avoiding GMOs at all costs. So, if soy, corn or cotton
products do not say "organic" or "non-GMO", you must not eat them.
Also, plant-based foods
leave the body in two to four days, while flesh based foods leave
the body in four to seven days.
My question is,
if flesh foods stay
in the body up to seven days, where do all those poisons go?
If eating a plant-based
diet not centered around organics you will need to detoxify your
The options are chlorella
and spirulina or organic sulfur crystals, which you can read about
below. But, the point is to take responsibility for yourself and get
out from under your doctor's grip with toxic, synthetic chemicals.
To get fit, those long things below your waist are legs and putting
one in front of the other is called walking and this is the simplest
form of exercise. An hour a day keeps the doctor away...
Connecting with God is easy. In Psalms it constantly tells us His
names will save us. He has millions of names that all refer to
aspects of his personality.
Jehovah means the
Eloi or Eluhaynu
means the Dear Friend
Krishna means the
Allah means the
Protector of the Cows
Govinds means the
One that Pleases the Senses
Abba means Father
So, find a name of His
you like and talk to Him. As He is in your heart, He will know if
you are serious.
Let you be in control of your life not some government run by