by Alex Newman
05 November
2018
from
TheNewAmerican Website
Regional governance amongst nations works in tandem
with regionalism within nations, such as with
Councils of Governments in the U.S.
Both are purposely designed to destroy the
nation-state, making way for Sustainable
Development, aka Technocracy.
Source
Creating a New
World Order Out of Regional Orders
The
Deep State's globalist plan for
what insiders refer to as the "New
World Order" - basically, a global government controlled
by themselves - begins with submerging the sovereignty of
nation-states into regional "orders."
These are better
understood as regional governments built using "free trade" deals as
the foundation, with
the European Union serving as the
premier example.
How do we know this is
the plan? Because top Deep State globalists have said so
publicly and repeatedly, and because that is the exact strategy
being pursued openly.
All over the world, pseudo-"free trade" agreements and other
sovereignty-shredding schemes are being used to transfer more and
more power to transnational bureaucracies and courts.
And eventually, these
regional orders will be interwoven into an overlapping patchwork of
multilateral regimes on the road to creating a truly global
authority, perhaps under
the United Nations or some less-discredited
future global body. At least, that is the globalist plan.
But it is starting to
show major cracks amid historic public backlash.
As far back as 1950, globalists had openly revealed their agenda for
global government under the United Nations.
In his book
War or Peace, for example,
global government-promoting
Council on Foreign Relations
co-founder John Foster Dulles spelled it out clearly.
"The United Nations
represents not a final stage in the development of world order,
but only a primitive stage," Dulles wrote.
"Therefore its
primary task is to create the conditions which will make
possible a more highly developed organization."
In the same book, Dulles
went on to argue that the existing UN Charter was strong enough to
serve as the foundation for a world government.
"I have never seen
any proposal made for collective security with 'teeth' in it, or
for 'world government' or for 'world federation,' which could
not be carried out either by the United Nations or under the
United Nations Charter," he said.
Unfortunately for
globalists, though, humanity was not yet ready to surrender its
sovereignty to an all-powerful world government.
Thus, regionalization...
In a 1962 report
headlined "A
World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations,"
financed by the U.S. State Department, CFR member and longtime State
Department official Lincoln Bloomfield argued that global
government could be brought about via regionalism.
In the plan, he proposed
that,
"ever larger units
evolve through customs unions, confederation, regionalism, etc.,
until ultimately the larger units coalesce under a global
umbrella."
Sound familiar?
Of course, that is
precisely the strategy that has been used, primarily relying on
"free-trade" schemes - in addition to going to war and threatening
war, other key tactics highlighted in the Bloomfield report.
By 1974, almost a quarter of a century after
CFR founder Dulles wrote his
infamous book, the globalist organization's mouthpiece, the magazine
dubbed
Foreign Affairs, was
telegraphing its strategy of globalism via incrementalism to
globalist insiders and useful idiots everywhere.
"In short, the 'house
of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather
than from the top down," wrote former Deputy Assistant Secretary
of State Richard N. Gardner in April of 1974.
"An end run around
national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish
much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
In short, globalists
recognized the reality that people were not willing to relinquish
control over their own nations and their own destinies all at once.
Instead, the plan would
have to be pursued slowly, quietly, and deceptively.
And so, piece by piece,
sovereignty was eroded using tools such as "free trade,"
international agreements, regional military alliances such as the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO),
and more.
Central to the plot was
convincing nations and peoples to surrender sovereignty not to some
global government-in-waiting right away, but to regional
organizations.
Consider former National Security Advisor
Zbigniew Brzezinski, a longtime
CFR member and one of the key figures behind globalist mastermind
David Rockefeller's
Trilateral Commission.
In 1995, speaking at
former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev's "State of the World
Forum," attended by The New American magazine's senior editor
William F. Jasper, Brzezinski outlined the plan clearly,
perhaps assuming he was speaking just to fellow globalists and
friends.
"We cannot leap into
world government in one quick step," he said.
"In brief, the
precondition for eventual
globalization - genuine
globalization - is progressive regionalization, because thereby
we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units."
Also in 1995, the
UN-created "Commission
on Global Governance" - yes, it really was called the
"Commission on Global Governance" - outlined precisely the same
strategy in its "Our
Global Neighborhood" report.
"The UN must gear
itself for a time when regionalism becomes more ascendant
worldwide and assist the process in advance of that time," wrote
the globalists on the UN commission, foreshadowing the strategy
that was about to go into overdrive.
"Regional
co-operation and integration should be seen as an important and
integral part of a balanced system of global governance."
Regional
Governments Everywhere
This regionalization and "integration" as a steppingstone toward
globalization of political and economic power is exactly what is
happening worldwide.
Here are some of the more
prominent examples - it is in no way an exhaustive list:
-
European Union
The EU is by far the most
developed supranational regime in the world, with former
Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev approvingly describing it
as "the new European Soviet" during a 2000 visit to Britain.
Originally, it
started as a "Coal
and Steel" agreement between six nations after
World War II. With key support of Deep State institutions
such as Bilderberg, the CFR, the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), and more, it gradually usurped more and more power
under the guise of "free trade."
Over the decades,
it morphed into the European Economic Community, the
European Community, and finally, the European
Union.
By 2012, then-EU
Commission President José Manuel Barroso, a former
Maoist revolutionary, was boasting of the machinations that
The New American had been warning of for decades, a
plot that globalists had generally denied as the EU was
forming.
"We will need
to move toward a federation," he said. "This is our
political horizon."
Today, the EU has
a single currency, a law-enforcement agency, a
proto-continental military, and much more.
Brussels, where
the monster is headquartered, has stolen more power than
even the U.S. federal government has taken from U.S. states
in some areas, purporting to have the authority to veto
national budgets passed by member states' elected
parliaments.
Despite being
opposed by citizens in referendums at virtually every turn,
the EU is still working to become "deeper" by usurping more
power, and "wider" by adding more and more members.
It is also
working to export its globalist model of total centralized
power to other regions of the world.
-
African Union
The AU is another one of
the more advanced regional unions smashing national
sovereignty and imposing unelected, supranational rulers on
diverse peoples.
Already, the AU
has a "Parliament," a military, a "Court of Justice," and
more. It is working on a continental currency, too.
Because Africa is
so vast and undeveloped, the globalist overlords are
actually using the same plan they are pursuing at the global
level to subsume nation-states, but on a continental scale.
Consider the emerging "Tripartite Free Trade Area."
Under the plan,
various "free trade" areas on the African continent are to
eventually be merged into a single, continent-wide "free
trade" regime with open borders from Cape Town to Cairo, and
a single African passport.
For a sneak
preview of the future under this regional regime, consider
that genocidal Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe was made
chairman of the AU before being overthrown by his own
military.
And of course, it
is an undisputed fact that outsiders - primarily the U.S.
government, the EU, and the dictatorship enslaving China -
are funding and imposing the AU on Africans.
Beijing built the
AU headquarters. The EU, meanwhile, funds more than 80
percent of the AU's program budget.
-
Union of South American States
In South America,
globalists and communists have foisted on the peoples an
emerging superstate known as UNASUL or
UNASUR, depending on the
language.
Inspired by the
EU, the forces behind this sovereignty-shredding scheme
envision a United States of South America, complete
with a South American military, currency, parliament, and
more.
Until recent
disagreements over the socialist dictatorship enslaving
Venezuela caused some member states to temporarily suspend
their participation, the socialist- and communist-dominated
supranational body was quickly usurping a vast array of
powers from member states.
And as is the
case in other parts of the world being subsumed under
regional governments, UNASUL/UNASUR is merely one of a vast
constellation of supranational institutions in Latin America
working to "integrate" the formerly sovereign nation-states
into a "regional order," to be followed by the "world
order."
Others include,
-
MERCOSUR
-
the
Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA)
-
the
Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC),
...and many
others.
-
Eurasian Union
In "Eurasia,"
Russian strongman Vladimir Putin is spearheading the
creation of what is currently known as the Eurasian Economic
Union, or
EEU.
It brings
together Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and
Kyrgyzstan, with other countries being inducted.
Eventually, they
hope to expand the union to include other former Soviet
states, particularly from the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS).
"It took
Europe 40 years to move from the European Coal and Steel
Community to the full European Union," Putin observed in
an op-ed for Izvestia, adding that the Eurasian Union is
"proceeding at a much faster pace because we could draw
on the experience of the EU and other regional
associations."
The harmonized
Eurasian regulatory regime is,
"in most
cases consistent with European standards," he added,
noting that it was "based on World Trade Organization
principles," while promising that the union would "help
ensure global sustainable development."
Putin noted that
eventually, the EU and the Eurasian Union could create a,
"harmonized
community of economies stretching from Lisbon to
Vladivostok, a free trade zone and even employing more
sophisticated integration patterns" that would pursue
"coordinated policies in industry, technology, the
energy sector, education, science, and also to
eventually scrap visas."
Ultimately,
"existing
regional institutions, such as the EU, NAFTA, APEC,
ASEAN inter alia," would become "the integration bricks
that can be used to build a more sustainable global
economy."
Top EU leaders
have echoed that rhetoric exactly.
Note the
reference to
NAFTA, too.
Around the world, there
is a dizzying array of other "integration" schemes working to
amalgamate once-sovereign nation-states into regional unions.
For instance, in the
Middle East, the already functioning Gulf Cooperation Council
(GCC)
is becoming a supranational regime over the nations of the Arabian
Peninsula.
Meanwhile, globalists
from the CFR and beyond are working to put the entire region under
what they tout as a "Middle East Union."
"Just as a warring
[European] continent found peace through unity by creating what
became the EU, Arabs, Turks, Kurds and other groups in the
region could find relative peace in ever closer union," claimed
Mohamed "Ed" Husain, an "adjunct senior fellow for Middle
Eastern studies" at the CFR, in a 2014 piece
published in the Financial Times.
In South East Asia, the
"Association of South East Asian Nations," more commonly known as
ASEAN, is doing the same.
In North America,
globalist architect
Henry "New
World Order" Kissinger
described NAFTA, which set up international tribunals and
bureaucracies, as,
"the most creative
step toward a New World Order taken by any group of countries
since the end of the Cold War."
Worldwide
Deception
There is no populated region on Earth not being subsumed under
regional government right now.
Obviously, the notion
that people all around the world just woke up one day seeking to
surrender sovereignty to a regional government is ludicrous. It was
all by design, of course. But all along, those responsible were
deceiving the public.
For instance, while
shackling the United Kingdom to the emerging European superstate,
then-British Prime Minister Edward Heath blatantly lied.
"There are some in
this country who fear that in going into Europe we shall in some
way sacrifice independence and sovereignty," Heath said in a
January 1973 prime ministerial TV broadcast.
"These fears, I need
hardly say, are completely unjustified."
Of course, not only were
those concerns completely justified, they underestimated the
subversion of sovereignty that would be taking place.
By 2016, the British
people had wised up, with more people voting to secede from the EU
with Brexit than have ever voted
for anything in U.K. history. Globalists are now doing everything
possible to overturn the vote, again using deception.
Almost three decades after Heath's lies, in a July 13, 2000
interview with the newspaper La Stampa, then-Italian Prime
Minister Giuliano Amato outlined the strategy of deception.
"The Union is the
vanguard of this changing world: it indicates a future of
princes without sovereignty," he said.
"The new entity is
faceless and those who are in command can neither be pinned down
nor elected... That is the way Europe was made too:
by creating
communitarian organisms without giving the organisms
presided over by national governments the impression that
they were being subjected to a higher power...
I don't think it is a
good idea to replace this slow and effective method - which
keeps national States free from anxiety while they are being
stripped of power - with great institutional leaps.
Therefore I prefer to
go slowly, to crumble pieces of sovereignty up little by little,
avoiding brusque transitions from national to [EU] federal
power."
Global Merger
of Regions
Globalists have been getting bolder in recent years, speaking openly
of their machinations and intentions.
For instance, former
National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
outlined the same plot to advance globalism as his co-conspirator
Brzezinski did two decades earlier at Gorbachev's confab, just
more openly.
"The contemporary
quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to
establish a concept of order within the various regions and to
relate these regional orders to one another," Kissinger
explained in an excerpt from his book World Order that appeared
on August 29, 2014, under the headline "Henry Kissinger on the
Assembly of a New World Order" in the Wall Street Journal.
Calling for a,
"structure of
international rules and norms" that is "fostered as a matter of
common conviction," he praised, in particular, developments on
the other side of the Atlantic.
"Europe has set out
to transcend the state," Kissinger said.
Despite the use of opaque
and sterile language, it is clear that Kissinger was calling for the
world's nations and peoples to be divided up into "regional orders"
as a prelude to the "New World Order" finale.
And as the EU works to transcend the nation-state at home, it is
working simultaneously to do the same worldwide, including in
North America.
In a revealing document
released in June 2016, the EU actually vowed to,
"support cooperative
regional orders worldwide," including in the Americas, while
touting global governance composed of regional governments based
on a "strong UN."
"We will invest in
regional orders, and in cooperation among and within regions,"
the superstate declared in its "Global Strategy" document,
echoing almost precisely the schemes outlined by Kissinger in
his book World Order.
"And we will promote
reformed global governance... The EU will strive for a strong UN
as the bedrock of the multilateral rules-based order."
Ironically, the EU
document acknowledges that people are upset with the globalist
agenda.
Indeed, the EU "Global
Strategy" document was released just five days after Brexit sent
shock waves through the globalist movement worldwide.
But the official document
goes on to suggest that surreptitiously undermining self-government
around the world to build regional governments is all for the good
of humanity, and so it must be pursued anyway.
"In a world caught
between global pressures and local pushback, regional dynamics
come to the fore," the document argued.
"Voluntary forms of
regional governance offer states and peoples the opportunity to
better manage security concerns, reap the economic gains of
globalization, express more fully cultures and identities, and
project influence in world affairs."
Eventually, as Kissinger
and others explained, after these regional governments are in full
control, the plan is to begin merging them with each other in
overlapping regional governments, again using "trade" as the
pretext.
The Transatlantic
Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP),
for example, was aimed at bringing the EU and North America together
under transatlantic bureaucracies, a longtime globalist goal that
has been worked on for generations.
This transatlantic
union would then create regulations and supranational kangaroo
courts over more than half of global GDP.
On the other side of the United States, the Trans-Pacific
Partnership (TPP)
did virtually the same thing.
Taken together, the
supranational regulatory regime that would emerge from the "trade"
regimes would govern virtually the entire global economy, with even
nations that were not technically under its thumb being forced to
submit just to continue participating in trade.
If the United States' people do not actively oppose these plans en
masse, the result will be the end of self-government, liberty,
prosperity, and Western civilization...
|