|
by The Exposé
March 29, 2024
from
Expose-News Website
The World Economic Forum (WEF)
and its fellow unelected globalist leaders (above image) are pushing for
governments around the world to phase out fossil fuels...
Leading experts have spoken out against their
plans and are warning the public that the WEF's "Net
Zero" goal to eliminate fossil fuels will result in the
deaths of over four billion people or more.
The "Net Zero" target to end fossil fuel use is part of the WEF and
UN's "Agenda 2030"
and "Agenda 2050" plans for humanity and involves
dramatically reducing fossil reliance by 2030 and completely
eliminating their use by 2050.
The WEF continues to push its agenda and has been calling for
taxpayers worldwide to pay $3.5 trillion per year,
which they insist is necessary to fund the
"noble" global power in order to meet the globalist
organization's "Net Zero" goal of "decarbonizing" the planet.
However, critics argue that "decarbonization" is
just a euphemism for the WEF's anti-human
agenda and experts are raising the alarm about what this will
actually mean for civilization, which includes the death of over
four billion people...
Starvation
Danish statistician Bjørn Lomborg is just
one who has warned that ending fossil fuel use will lead to the
deaths of around half of the world's population through starvation
alone.
"4 billion people are dependent on fossil
fertilizer for food," Lomborg notes.
"Without it, 4 billion will starve to death."
"It is time to call out the astoundingly
destructive and misanthropic campaigners," he declared.
The article Lomborg was responding to was by
British economist Neil Record in the Telegraph, who argued
that the number of people that might die was closer to six billion.
Six Billion Would Die in a Year
Neil Record
reported:
"If we literally just stopped using fossil
fuels and did without the natural resources on which the world,
its economies and populations depend, most likely six billion
people would die within a year.
"Breaking down what would happen in a world
without fossil fuels", Record notes that "most people would
suffer blackouts due to the grid being so seriously compromised,
possibly fatally, and they may be widespread and permanent."
From day one, gas users would be the first to
feel the change of,
...and in 10 or 15 days, the UK
would have to turn off its gas distribution system as it would be
unable to maintain pressure.
In turn, the domestic supply would be shut down
too - gas would stop flowing, and some 21 million households (74% of
the population) would no longer have heating, hot water, and cooking
facilities.
"In their panic, people might turn to
electricity for their cooking and heating, but wait…" says
Record, who adds, "the UK
electricity grid relies on natural gas as its 'buffer' energy
source.
Every day, demand varies according to
consumer demand, and the other main energy supplier, renewables,
are highly variable and can only power the grid when gas is
picking up the lion's share of the gap between their output and
consumer demand."
Source
So the moment that the main gas distribution
system is de-pressurized, the grid-balancing system fails and power
cuts ensue.
Electricity demand would have rocketed through
the switch to electric space heating, cooking and water-heating, and
so it seems very likely that the sudden excess demand would be
undeliverable, and therefore that the grid would spiral into
uncontrollability resulting in no electricity.
This also means there would be no communication
systems no mobile phones and no television.
Without power, there will be no running water
and no heating and the most vulnerable people will start to die,
according to Record.
Initially, this will be the elderly in their own
homes, then in hospitals when the diesel backup generators run out
of fuel.
Within the first 25 days new,
"existential problems emerge for ordinary
people in the form of food availability and distribution."
Source
Starvation Begins From
Day 25
Day 25
By the twenty-fifth day, diesel and petrol
are likely to have run dry, although.
Record says that he is probably being
generous with the timing here, but what this will mean is that
food distribution would fail, and so as most of the population
are entirely dependent on bought food they will begin to starve.
Interestingly, it will be only the isolated
rural communities, and those who are agriculturally
self-sufficient would be relatively unaffected.
Day 50
Many people in urban areas would now be near
death from starvation, Record claims, and
"law and order would have broken down"
and due to the "increasingly desperate search for the means
of survival" he suspects there will have been "mass conflict
and slaughter taking place."
Without the sanitary conditions that we have
due to power, water supply, and sewage flow, we will see a
return of Victorian diseases such as cholera and
dysentery.
Day 100
Money and status will be irrelevant as time
passes and just three months after the world stops oil, Neil
Record guesses that around half of the world's population
of approximately four billion, people would be dead,
"The first to die would be the urban
poor; then the middle and upper classes"
Again, the survivors would be those in rural
areas and able to live off local agricultural produce or live
off dwindling food stocks.
For fifty-five percent of people in urban areas,
it will be almost impossible to access food
and safe water as there will be none of the normal distribution
routes for food or storage facilities (chillers/freezers)
without electricity, and without pumped water, clean water would
be unavailable, or close to impossible to access.
Source
A Year Without Oil - Murder and
Mayhem
Day 365
After
a year without oil Record says
"perhaps a further two billion people
would have starved or frozen to death, leaving, say, two
billion left alive remaining food stocks would have been
exhausted or spoiled, and the inevitable breakdown of law
and order would have meant many would meet a violent end."
"Competition for scarce resources, so
elegantly solved by the invention of markets and prices,
would be replaced by murder and mayhem"
There is now no going back as the means to
reverse the just stop oil experiment would have gone.
"The mass extinction would have robbed
societies of their cultures, education, and survival
techniques. A new dark age would ensue",
...and as Record says this is a nightmarish
scenario, but claims that everything in this scenario is well
supported by fact.
Source
Meadows Depopulation
Members of the WEF have repeatedly
suggested that mass reductions in the number of humans on
earth would help the organization reach its green agenda goals,
and as being reported,
Dennis Meadows who is a celebrated member of the WEF,
"has called for
a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans."
Meadows is one of the main authors of the
Club of Rome's 1972
pro-depopulation book "The
Limits to Growth"
and an honorary
member of the Club of Rome as well as a member
of the World Economic Forum (WEF),
argues that the goal can be achieved "peacefully."
Dennis Meadows
Meadow's book was published over 50 years ago,
but his ideology appears to still align with the WEF's anti-human,
depopulation agenda, of today...!
He argued that,
"most of the world's population must be wiped
out so that the survivors can 'have freedom' and a 'high
standard of living.'
'The survivors' are a select few, however,
and it is unlikely that many of us will be included. (It's that
big club again)."
Source
One Way or Another
Experts who have warned of the dangers associated
with stopping oil should not be ignored, it is blatantly obvious
that our unelected leaders are not interested in our
well-being.
Those who have been promised a privileged
position in the
depopulated world of the future, have many ways they
hope to achieve their aims, whether it be through,
...etc, etc, they aim to get us, one way or
another, and stopping oil is just one more way...
Resources
|
