by A Lily Bit
July 26, 2024
from ALilyBit Website

Italian version

The Whole East-West Conflict

has been Orchestrated to Sell You a

Centralized Monetary System

and Global Government Programs

as the "Solution"...

For years, I've been sounding the alarm about the impending economic war between the East and the West - it was never a matter of if, but when.

The timing of this conflict is no accident; it's a matter of convenience for those who pull the strings behind the scenes.

To truly understand geopolitics, one must acknowledge that international conflicts are carefully orchestrated to serve the interests of a select group of powerful "elites."

Those who blindly attribute these events to mere coincidence are doing themselves a disservice, as they will never comprehend the true reasons behind the calamities befalling them and the world at large.

In my article, "The Danger of Co-option and False Prophets," I outlined the web of connections between the Kremlin and globalist institutions such as,

• the World Economic Forum (WEF)

• the Bank of International Settlements (BIS)

• the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

• influential figures like Henry Kissinger...

Moreover, I highlighted the ties between Russia and international banks like Goldman Sachs.

Despite the war in Ukraine and Russia's annexation of Crimea, these connections remain intact, as Russia has long been entwined in the globalist agenda.

China's collusion with globalist institutions reaches new heights, as it has amassed trillions in debt to satisfy the IMF's prerequisites for joining the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket of currencies.

This move from a debt-free nation to one buried in debt is a clear indication of China's commitment to the globalist centralization agenda.

The notion that China is an "anti-globalist" power is nothing more than a carefully orchestrated opera of "feel-good"-bullshit.

I grow weary of reiterating,

the well-established connections between eastern nations and the globalist institutions.

The evidence is clear and abundant, thanks to the groundbreaking work of researchers like Antony Sutton, who exposed these machinations long before I entered the scene.

The true purpose of engineering a war becomes apparent when one considers the benefits of manipulating both sides of a conflict.

Beyond the immediate gains, chaos serves as a catalyst for advancing oppressive agendas that would otherwise face public resistance during times of peace.

In this analysis, I propose that we shift our focus from the mere existence of war to the intricacies of its development and timeline.

By understanding the stages of this impending economic conflict, we may be better prepared to mitigate its impact and potentially alter its course.

First and foremost, it is crucial to recognize that the initiative lies with the eastern nations.

Their actions will set the pace for the unfolding of events, and understanding their motivations and strategies is key to anticipating the trajectory of this looming conflict.

Marxists, in their philosophy, grasped a fundamental truth:

true wealth is derived from resources, the means of production, and labor.

However, their misguided focus on confiscating these elements while promoting the illusion of public benefit is where their ideology falls short.

Eastern nations continue to recognize the essence of genuine wealth, as they understand that even with vast sums of money, an economy is doomed without a solid manufacturing foundation and resource development.

 

This simple yet profound principle eludes the Western world, which has largely forsaken its means of production and hampered resource exploration through contrived environmental concerns such as "carbon pollution."

The East has managed to avoid this pitfall, preserving its long-term productivity.

 

Consequently, they hold a distinct advantage in the event of a global economic conflict.

However, the true catalyst for the progression of an economic world war lies in the combination of participating nations and their trade agreements.

The interconnectedness of these factors will significantly influence the trajectory and outcome of such a conflict.

Russia and China have been diligently fostering bilateral trade arrangements designed to circumvent the U.S. dollar for years.

 

This strategic alliance, rooted in economic sensibility, unites Russia's abundant natural resources with China's expansive manufacturing and export capabilities.

A prime example of this partnership is the recent 30-year oil and gas agreement between the two nations, valued at hundreds of billions of dollars.

This historic deal coincides with the ongoing construction of a major pipeline from Russia to China, set for completion by 2025.

 

India, too, has secured arrangements for increased oil shipments from Russia, opting to transact without the involvement of the U.S. dollar.

 

The allure of competitive pricing amidst a backdrop of surging energy prices worldwide further bolsters the attractiveness of Russian resources.

The remaining BRICS nations (Brazil, India, China, and South Africa) have remained steadfast in their trade relationships with Russia, undeterred by Western sanctions and the exclusion of Russian banks from the SWIFT international payments network.

The formation of this trading bloc has significant implications for the timeline of a potential global economic conflict...

By establishing robust, self-sufficient economic networks, these nations are better positioned to withstand external pressures and navigate the challenges of a world war.

The interconnectedness of these trade agreements and the resilience they foster will undoubtedly influence the progression and outcome of any future conflict.

In the unfolding economic war, the true objective is not to target Russia or China, but rather to undermine the U.S. dollar and the American economy.

While the consequences of such a conflict will reverberate globally, it is our economy that remains uniquely vulnerable due to its unwavering dependence on the U.S. dollar's status as the global reserve currency.

An economic war, waged with strategic weapons and tactics, presents a formidable challenge - one that we, as Americans, are ill-equipped to overcome. The dollar's global reserve status, once considered a strength, has now become our Achilles' heel.

As the world's gaze remains fixed on the armed conflict in Ukraine, few recognize that the most devastating blows will be felt right here on our own shores - without a single bullet fired.

The sanctions imposed on Russia are but a single facet of the issue, as they contribute to a broader decoupling from the dollar trade...

However, the true crux of the matter lies with the BRICS nations and their extensive network of trading partners, who will collectively resist accepting such sanctions.

Their economic interdependence has fostered a resilience that will prove difficult to dismantle.

A compelling example of the potential consequences of this economic war can be observed in Hungary's declaration to maintain its current levels of Russian oil and gas imports.

This decision, driven by the need to avert an energy crisis within its borders, is a harbinger of similar choices being made by other nations worldwide.

If NATO continues to advocate for Russia's economic isolation, it is inevitable that these countries will seek to distance themselves from the U.S. dollar as their reserve currency.

The root of this shift can be traced back to the Biden administration and the European Union's decision to sanction Russia, which included freezing Russia's U.S. dollar accounts and severing its connection to the international payments platform.

This act of economic warfare exposed a chilling possibility:

if the West can financially isolate Russia, they could do the same to any other nation, including the United States.

Zoltan Poszar, Credit Suisse's global head of interest rate strategy, offered a sobering assessment during an interview with Bloomberg's "Odd Lots" show:

"Wars tend to turn into major junctures for global currencies, and with Russia losing access to its foreign currency reserves, a message has been sent to all countries that they can't count on these money stashes to actually be theirs in the event of tension.

 

As such, it may make less and less sense for global reserve managers to hold dollars for safety, given that they could be taken away right when they're most needed."

As global tensions rise, nations are increasingly recognizing the risks associated with dependence on U.S. and Western financial systems and currencies.

This shift in perception, fueled by the West's actions against Russia, may ultimately lead to a reevaluation of the role of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency.

Indeed, the very architects of this economic conflict - the establishment elites in the US and Europe - are inadvertently setting the stage for the demise of the U.S. dollar.

The currency's status hinges on the faith and belief in its demand, and any decline in this demand, triggered by global sanctions, could result in a massive influx of U.S. dollars held in overseas banks returning to the U.S.

This flood of greenbacks would plunge the nation further into a stagflationary crisis.

It appears that the globalists are fully cognizant of these potential consequences and are, in fact, relying on them. The ramifications of their actions, while devastating for the general population, could serve to further their own interests and objectives.

The year 2030 looms large in the plans of globalist institutions such as the,

• United Nations

• IMF

• WEF,

...who consistently refer to it as the culmination of their Great Reset agenda.

Should a global economic crisis serve as the catalyst, as it seems to be, a few years would be required for the collapse to unfold and for the introduction of a "solution" to the problem.

Consequently, the economic war must escalate rapidly in the coming years.

Currently, we are witnessing 40-year highs in inflation and significant supply chain disruptions. Furthermore, multiple globalist foundations are "predicting" worldwide food shortages within the next 3 to 6 months.

I anticipate that the conflict will escalate to include China within the next year, with the majority of the damage being inflicted by the end of 2025 .

The pace at which exporters, primarily China, divest from the dollar will be the primary trigger for this accelerated war.

The WEF's Great Reset agenda and the IMF's Special Drawing Rights global digital currency initiative necessitate the demise of the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency.

This is a process that globalists have openly discussed for some time, and it is not a mere "conspiracy theory" but rather a "conspiracy reality."

The IMF has frequently argued that the global currency framework must be "managed" by a centralized entity capable of preventing national governments from manipulating currency trade for their own benefit, including digital currencies.

The stage has been meticulously set for this narrative.

The U.S., especially under a new Trump presidency, will be portrayed as an example of the perils of nationalism and the dangers of entrusting a single nation with the power of a world reserve currency.

The temptation for governments to engage in excessive money creation and debt-financed spending sprees, resulting in the fabrication of new money to pay for old debts, devalues and degrades the dollar's purchasing power worldwide.

Consequently, it is only "logical" that a global central authority, devoid of national loyalties, assumes control of an "international" reserve currency, right?

Perhaps a multi-currency-based basket system, or possibly a single world currency, to prevent any future abuses of power and tragedies from recurring.

Wouldn't that instill a sense of safety?

Do not be deceived - the chaos of a global conflict, be it economic or kinetic, and the demise of the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency, serves as the perfect pretext for the "logical" emergence of a global financial oligarchy.

Unlike its predecessors, this ruling council would operate in broad daylight, its authority "official" and its control established as essential for global stability.

This pattern of centralization has emerged following every major war or conflict:

the argument is made that national sovereignty is the root cause, and that nation-states should not exist because differing ideas can lead to conflict.

After World War I, the League of Nations was introduced; after World War II, the UN and the IMF were established.

In the aftermath of today's economic World War III, globalists will attempt to implement a one-world currency and global economic governance program.

"In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

Richard Gardner

Foreign Affairs, 1974

Globalists argue that a homogeneous global collective with a single hive mind is preferable, as it would prevent any potential conflicts.

However, they conveniently reserve the right to form their own group, with the intent of reaping all the benefits of the crisis and consolidating power from the ensuing panic.

Beware the machinations of those who seek to exploit chaos for their own gain, dismantling national sovereignty and consolidating power in the process...