by Jon Rappoport
People have 'Coronavirus'?
Let's go to the
tests and find out
Lockdown of the population,
and the virus
The other day, I was in a UPS store, and a customer was paying for a
large box he was sending to Florida. I asked him what was in the
The 'new economy'...
The majority of the people stripping items off store shelves know
nothing about the virus, and if they did, they wouldn't care.
They're acting like frothing marauders because other people are,
"I've got to get
paper towels and pet food because everyone else is hoarding
Now there's REAL
If no one were
hoarding, store shelves would be adequately stocked, and
shopping would be a relatively calm affair.
the advice to maintain "social distancing," and wall-to-wall
propaganda about "transmission of the virus" have resulted in,
mass cancelation of
public events and the shuttering of large venues.
Untold numbers of
small businesses are in serious trouble.
This is a direct attack on the economy.
It is also a ripping
of the right to "peaceably assemble," one of the natural
freedoms embodied in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution.
"the threat to public
safety and health" is invoked to override freedoms and rights.
You would think the
public sees through this tired excuse for dictatorial control,
but it is not the case.
Parental government as a
concept and a practice has invaded minds.
"Well, sure, they're
taking care of us."
If you believe that,
I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon...
At another level, quarantines serve to enforce the idea that all
people are medical patients for their whole lives - and, therefore,
they must follow medical orders.
For what? For all
possible diseases and infections...
As far as the coronavirus is concerned, forget about contagion and
transmission for the moment.
What about the
widespread diagnostic test for the virus in humans?
Is this PCR test
Is it useful?
I keep coming back to the
issue, because the whole designation of a "coronavirus case," if it
means anything at all, depends on the veracity of the test - not in
a lab or a medical journal, but in life, in the world.
I repeat what I wrote in a recent article:
Outside of China, the
most widely used test is called
It must be done with
tremendous care, because contamination with irrelevant microbes and
cellular material can yield a misleading and absurd result.
The PCR, it is claimed, can take a tiny, tiny bit of material from a
patient and blow it up many times, so it can be identified.
"This is the
coronavirus. This patient is infected."
Not only that, the test's
proponents assert that, quite easily, the PCR can also determine the
AMOUNT of virus in the patient's body.
Why is that vitally
important? Because, to even begin talking about the patient ever
getting sick, he must have millions and millions of coronavirus
actively replicating in his body.
There are people (and I'm one of them) who challenge the claim that
the PCR can show how much virus is in the patient's body. The
experts try to brush us off - we don't understand the intricacies
of the test, it's highly technical, we're not qualified to make a
I've been searching for a way around this futile argument.
In the process, I've
discovered something important about the PCR.
I SEE NO EVIDENCE
THAT THE ACCURACY OF THE TEST HAS EVER BEEN PROVEN...
Let me explain.
You bring your car to
a good repair shop.
The mechanics hook it
up to a device and run a test to diagnose what's causing the car
Who says their tests
are accurate? At some point in the past, these diagnostic
procedures have been vetted, to make sure they work properly.
And sure enough, when the mechanics say,
"We've found the
...and when they
correct that problem, you drive the car and it doesn't stall
This is called a
This is not the situation re the PCR. Its proponents claim it can
count how much virus is in a patient's body - how much of a
But where is the
proof, in real-life terms, that the PCR can do that?
How was that proof
When I say proof, I don't
mean technical mumbo-jumbo.
I'm not referring to the
highly dense language these scientists use among themselves. I'm
talking about real live human patients, and results.
After all, if the PCR is being used to diagnose people, and if the
results are being used to count the number of coronavirus cases in
various countries, and if the number of cases forms the basis for,
say, locking down the whole of Italy in a mass quarantine…
THE TEST IS
IMPORTANT, WOULDN'T YOU SAY...?
I have seen no
wide-ranging proof that the PCR was ever checked properly, when it
was first introduced, to show it could do what researchers say it
WHO TESTED THE
I have come up with a process - a simple process - which will check
the veracity of the PCR.
It should have been
carried out decades ago.
The fact that it
wasn't is an enormous scandal.
Here it is.
From a hundred
patients, very small tissue samples are taken.
The PCR lab people
don't take the samples.
They don't ever see
the patients or know who they are.
The lab professionals run these hundred samples through the PCR,
obtain results, and then report:
what virus did
they find in each case, and how much of that virus did they
Let's say, in six
instances, the lab techs claim they found a great amount of
virus in the patients.
Well, those patients should be sick.
Are they? ARE THEY...???
that patients 4, 9, 32, 54, 65, and 86 all have a huge amount of
virus in their bodies."
"Interesting. Thanks. Let's see. Hmm. Turns out these people are
fit as a fiddle. Not sick. I guess your test didn't work. It's a
Or maybe the test does
work. The six patients are sick.
LET'S FIND OUT... IN THE
WORLD, NOT IN 'JOURNALS'...
That's what I mean by real-life results. No jive, no
There is more.
This experiment with
the hundred patients? It should be done, not just once, but many
A hundred patients
here at this facility, a hundred patients there at that
Thirty or forty
different facilities, and thirty or forty different sets of a
It should be done by
independent scientists without conflicts of interest.
It should have been done decades ago.
I see no evidence that it
THE TEST WAS
NEVER PROPERLY TESTED - A GIANT SCANDAL
Think about what that means.
Now let's go to China, where we're told the majority of people who
"have the virus" reside.
What diagnostic test
are they using there? CT scans of the lungs.
Looking for what?
Why? Because it's
being called the number one symptom of coronavirus infection.
They're kidding, right?
Well, pneumonia has
many causes, none of which needs the presence of a coronavirus.
That's number one.
Number two, roughly
300,000 people in China die of pneumonia every year -
long before the supposed coronavirus emerged.
And number three, in
the city of Wuhan, where the "epidemic" supposedly started, the
air quality is horrific. Last summer, protests on the streets of
Wuhan attested to citizen outrage at the problem.
And, breaking news:
quality can cause pneumonia - no germs of any kind necessary...
But of course, we can
sweep all these concerns off the table because, well, who cares
about the accuracy of tests?
If people in Los Angeles
are fighting over who gets the last six rolls of toilet paper,
that's all the proof we need:
this is a global
epidemic caused by a 'virus'...
Finally, I'll make a few comments concerning the 'BUT WHAT ABOUT
They have endless
questions centering on reports of corona cases in this country,
that country, this city, that town, another planet, another
I have answered some
of those questions...
There is a basic point
covering all the questions:
DO NOT ASSUME THE
PEOPLE WHO ARE SICK IN VARIOUS PLACES ARE ALL SUFFERING FROM THE
SAME CAUSE. You might want to read that statement several times.
Since the diagnostic tests for the virus are inaccurate,
wrong-headed, and absurd, the LUMPING OF ALL THESE SICK PEOPLE
EVERYWHERE UNDER THE SAME LABEL - CORONAVIRUS - IS MEANINGLESS
AND DECEPTIVE. Don't fall for it. Be smarter than that. Stop
trying to use one explanation to account for all supposed cases
of the virus.
And furthermore, don't make the false assumption that all these
reported coronavirus cases are the result of NEW disease or
never- before-seen disease.
Where people are
genuinely ill, many or most of them have the same health
conditions that have been affecting humans for a long, long time
- now recycled and re-labeled CORONAVIRUS.
I'm giving you insights I
gained in 1987 while researching
In a nutshell, I took
the groups the CDC claimed were at high-risk for AIDS -
Haitians, Africans in certain countries, IV street drug users,
gay men, hemophiliacs - and found that, for the most part, the
groups were suffering from very old diseases and
long-standing horrendous environmental conditions.
Nothing to do with HIV.
And where new illness was
present, the causes were mainly chemical toxicity.
"It has to be all
coronavirus or all something else."
Wrong. False. Misguided.
Baloney. Start over...
I discovered this central con-hustle of the medical cartel
34 years ago, and it applies precisely and across the board, in the
For example, for those people researching
5G technology and its harmful
health effects, stop stretching your necks trying to prove that 5G
has to be THE real and single cause of ALL supposed 'corona
If you show 5G
applies to one or two areas where people are being falsely
labeled with the virus, you've done a major service. If you
can't prove 5G applies to other areas, that's not a problem.
We're looking at multiple factors here.
Some people are
sick because of X. Others because of Y. Others because of Z.
Still others are not sick at all...
But ALL OF
THEM are being falsely corralled under the LABEL of "coronavirus"...
We don't need to replace
one fake label with another single label.
Frankly, to use a
technical term, this bullshit needs to stop...
If you're somewhat puzzled by this article, go back and read it
again. Keep doing that until it comes clear.
I say this because,
in 1987, I had the same facts in front of me, the same basic
facts I have presented in this article - and it took me three
months to realize the implications and see where I'd bought the
The biggest con of all:
THIS EPIDEMIC 'IS ONE
No. It isn't...