Hello.
I am Reiner Fuellmich
and I have been admitted to the Bar in Germany and in California
for 26 years.
I have been
practicing law primarily as a trial lawyer against fraudulent
corporations such as Deutsche Bank, formerly one of the world’s
largest and most respected banks, today one of the most toxic
criminal organizations in the world; VW, one of the world’s
largest and most respected car manufacturers, today notorious
for its giant diesel fraud; and Kuehne and Nagel, the world’s
largest shipping company. We’re suing them in a
multi-million-dollar bribery case.
I’m also one of four members of the German Corona Investigative
Committee. Since July 10, 2020, this Committee has been
listening to a large number of international scientists’ and
experts’ testimony to find answers to questions about the corona
crisis, which more and more people worldwide are asking.
All the above-mentioned cases of corruption and fraud committed
by the German corporations pale in comparison in view of the
extent of the damage that the corona crisis has caused and
continues to cause.
This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be
renamed a "Corona Scandal" and those responsible for it must be
criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages.
On a political level,
everything must be done to make sure that no one will ever again
be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity
or to attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas. And
for this reason I will now explain to you how and where an
international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort
case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile
unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever
committed.
Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with
the Nuremberg trials after World War II, that is, when they
dealt with the main war criminals of the Third Reich. Crimes
against humanity are today regulated in section 7 of the
International Criminal Code. The three major questions to be
answered in the context of a judicial approach to the corona
scandal are:
Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR-test pandemic?
Specifically, does a positive PCR-test result mean that the
person tested is infected with Covid-19, or does it mean
absolutely nothing in connection with the Covid-19 infection?
Do the so-called
anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face
masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to
protect the world’s population from corona, or do these measures
serve only to make people panic so that they believe - without
asking any questions - that their lives are in danger, so that
in the end the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate
huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody
tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic
fingerprints?
Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied,
more so than any other country, by the chief protagonists of
this so-called corona pandemic,
-
Mr.
Drosten, virologist at
charity hospital in Berlin
-
Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and head of
the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI
-
Mr.
Tedros, Head
of the World Health Organization or WHO,
...because Germany is
known as a particularly disciplined country and was therefore to
become a role model for the rest of the world for its strict
and, of course, successful adherence to the corona measures?
Answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the
allegedly new and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused
any excess mortality anywhere in the world, and certainly not
here in Germany.
But the anti-corona measures, whose only basis
are the PCR-test results, which are in turn all based on the
German Drosten test, have, in the meantime, caused the loss of
innumerable human lives and have destroyed the economic
existence of countless companies and individuals worldwide.
In Australia, for
example, people are thrown into prison if they do not wear a
mask or do not wear it properly, as deemed by the authorities.
In the Philippines, people who do not wear a mask or do not wear
it properly, in this sense, are getting shot in the head.
Let me first give you a summary of the facts as they present
themselves today.
The most important thing in a lawsuit is to
establish the facts - that is, to find out what actually
happened. That is because the application of the law always
depends on the facts at issue. If I want to prosecute someone
for fraud, I cannot do that by presenting the facts of a car
accident.
So what happened here regarding the alleged corona
pandemic?
The facts laid out below are, to a large extent, the result of
the work of the Corona Investigative Committee.
This Committee was
founded on July 10, 2020 by four lawyers in order to determine,
through hearing expert testimony of international scientists and
other experts:
How dangerous is
the virus really?
What is the significance of a positive PCR test?
What collateral damage has been caused by the corona
measures, both with respect to the world population’s
health, and with respect to the world’s economy?
Let me start with a
little bit of background information.
What happened in May 2019
and then in early 2020? And what happened 12 years earlier with
the swine flu, which many of you may have forgotten about? In
May 2019, the stronger of the two parties which govern Germany
in a grand coalition, the CDU, held a Congress on Global Health,
apparently at the instigation of important players from the
pharmaceutical industry and the tech industry. At this Congress,
the usual suspects, you might say, gave their speeches. Angela
Merkel was there, and the German Secretary of Health, Jens Spahn.
But, some other people, whom one would not necessarily expect to
be present at such a gathering, were also there: Professor
Drosten, virologist from the Charite hospital in Berlin;
Professor Wieler, veterinarian and Head of the RKI, the German
equivalent of the CDC; as well as Mr. Tedros, philosopher and
Head of the World Health Organization (WHO). They all gave
speeches there.
Also present and
giving speeches were the chief lobbyists of the world’s two
largest health funds, namely the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.
Less than a year later, these
very people called the shots in the proclamation of the
worldwide corona pandemic, made sure that mass PCR tests were
used to prove mass infections with Covid-19 all over the world,
and are now pushing for vaccines to be invented and sold
worldwide.
These infections, or rather the positive test results that the
PCR tests delivered, in turn became the justification for
worldwide lockdowns, social distancing and mandatory face masks.
It is important to note at this point that the
definition of a
pandemic was changed 12 years earlier.
Until then, a
pandemic was considered to be a disease that spread worldwide
and which led to many serious illnesses and deaths.
Suddenly, and for
reasons never explained, it was supposed to be a worldwide
disease only. Many serious illnesses and many deaths were not
required any more to announce a pandemic. Due to this change,
the WHO, which is closely intertwined with the global
pharmaceutical industry, was able to declare the swine flu
pandemic in 2009, with the result that vaccines were produced
and sold worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept
secret until today.
These vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the
swine flu eventually turned out to be a mild flu, and never
became the horrific plague that the pharmaceutical industry and
its affiliated universities kept announcing it would turn into,
with millions of deaths certain to happen if people didn’t get
vaccinated.
These vaccines also
led to serious health problems. About 700 children in Europe
fell incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely
disabled. The vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers’ money
had to be destroyed with even more taxpayers’ money.
Already then, during the swine flu, the German virologist
Drosten was one of those who stirred up panic in the population,
repeating over and over again that the swine flu would claim
many hundreds of thousands, even millions of deaths all over the
world. In the end, it was mainly thanks to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg
and his efforts as a member of the German Bundestag, and also a
member of the Council of Europe, that this hoax was brought to
an end before it would lead to even more serious consequences.
Fast forward to March of 2020, when the German Bundestag
announced an Epidemic Situation of National Importance, which is
the German equivalent of a pandemic in March of 2020 and, based
on this, the lockdown with the suspension of all essential
constitutional rights for an unforeseeable time, there was only
one single opinion on which the Federal Government in Germany
based its decision.
In an outrageous violation of the
universally accepted principle "audiatur et altera pars", which
means that one must also hear the other side, the only person
they listened to was Mr. Drosten.
That is the very person whose horrific, panic-inducing prognoses
had proved to be catastrophically false 12 years earlier. We
know this because a whistleblower named David Sieber, a member
of the Green Party, told us about it.
He did so first on
August 29, 2020 in Berlin, in the context of an event at which
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. also took part, and at which both men
gave speeches. And he did so afterwards in one of the sessions
of our Corona Committee.
The reason he did this is that he had become increasingly
sceptical about the official narrative propagated by politicians
and the mainstream media. He had therefore undertaken an effort
to find out about other scientists’ opinions and had found them
on the Internet. There, he realized that there were a number of
highly renowned scientists who held a completely different
opinion, which contradicted the horrific prognoses of Mr.
Drosten.
They assumed - and
still do assume - that there was no disease that went beyond the
gravity of the seasonal flu, that the population had already
acquired cross- or T-cell immunity against this allegedly new
virus, and that there was therefore no reason for any special
measures, and certainly not for vaccinations.
These scientists include Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford
University in California, a specialist in statistics and
epidemiology, as well as public health, and at the same time the
most quoted scientist in the world; Professor Michael Levitt,
Nobel prize-winner for chemistry and also a biophysicist at
Stanford University; the German professors Kary Mölling,
Sucharit Bhakti, Klud Wittkowski, as well as Stefan Homburg; and
now many, many more scientists and doctors worldwide, including
Dr. Mike Yeadon.
Dr. Mike Yeadon is
the former Vice-President and Scientific Director of Pfizer, one
of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. I will
talk some more about him a little later.
At the end of March, beginning of April of 2020, Mr. Sieber
turned to the leadership of his Green Party with the knowledge
he had accumulated, and suggested that they present these other
scientific opinions to the public and explain that, contrary to
Mr. Drosten’s doomsday prophecies, there was no reason for the
public to panic.
Incidentally, Lord Sumption, who served as a
judge at the British supreme court from 2012 to 2018, had done
the very same thing at the very same time and had come to the
very same conclusion: that there was no factual basis for panic
and no legal basis for the corona measures.
Likewise, the former President of the German federal
constitutional court expressed - albeit more cautiously -
serious doubts that the corona measures were constitutional. But
instead of taking note of these other opinions and discussing
them with David Sieber, the Green Party leadership declared that
Mr. Drosten’s panic messages were good enough for the Green
Party. Remember, they’re not a member of the ruling coalition;
they’re the opposition.
Still, that was
enough for them, just as it had been good enough for the Federal
Government as a basis for its lockdown decision, they said. They
subsequently, the Green Party leadership called David Sieber a
conspiracy theorist, without ever having considered the content
of his information, and then stripped him of his mandates.
Now let’s take a look at the current actual situation regarding
the virus’s danger, the complete uselessness of PCR tests for
the detection of infections, and the lockdowns based on
non-existent infections. In the meantime, we know that the
health care systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed
by Covid-19.
On the contrary, many
hospitals remain empty to this day and some are now facing
bankruptcy.
The hospital ship Comfort, which anchored in New York at the
time, and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never
accommodated more than some 20 patients. Nowhere was there any
excess mortality. Studies carried out by Professor Ioannidis and
others have shown that the mortality of corona is equivalent to
that of the seasonal flu.
Even the pictures
from Bergamo and New York that were used to demonstrate to the
world that panic was in order proved to be deliberately
misleading.
Then, the so-called "Panic Paper" was leaked, which was written
by the German Department of the Interior. Its classified content
shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that, in fact, the population
was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and mainstream
media.
The accompanying irresponsible statements of the Head of
the RKI - remember the [German] CDC - Mr. Wieler, who repeatedly
and excitedly announced that the corona measures must be
followed unconditionally by the population without them asking
any question, shows that that he followed the script verbatim.
In his public statements, he kept announcing that the situation
was very grave and threatening, although the figures compiled by
his own Institute proved the exact opposite.
Among other things, the "Panic Paper" calls for children to be
made to feel responsible - and I quote - "for the painful
tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not
follow the corona rules", that is, if they do not wash their
hands constantly and don’t stay away from their grandparents.
A word of
clarification: in Bergamo, the vast majority of deaths, 94% to
be exact, turned out to be the result not of Covid-19, but
rather the consequence of the government deciding to transfer
sick patients, sick with probably the cold or seasonal flu, from
hospitals to nursing homes in order to make room at the
hospitals for all the Covid patients, who ultimately never
arrived.
There, at the nursing homes, they then infected old people with
a severely weakened immune system, usually as a result of
pre-existing medical conditions. In addition, a flu vaccination,
which had previously been administered, had further weakened the
immune systems of the people in the nursing homes. In New York,
only some, but by far not all hospitals were overwhelmed.
Many people, most of whom were again elderly and had serious
pre-existing medical conditions, and most of whom, had it not
been for the panic-mongering, would have just stayed at home to
recover, raced to the hospitals.
There, many of them
fell victim to healthcare-associated infections (or nosocomial
infections) on the one hand, and incidents of malpractice on the
other hand, for example, by being put on a respirator rather
than receiving oxygen through an oxygen mask.
Again, to clarify: Covid-19, this is the current state of
affairs, is a dangerous disease, just like the seasonal flu is a
dangerous disease. And of course, Covid-19, just like the
seasonal flu, may sometimes take a severe clinical course and
will sometimes kill patients.
However, as autopsies have shown, which were carried out in
Germany in particular, by the forensic scientist Professor Klaus
Püschel in Hamburg, the fatalities he examined had almost all
been caused by serious pre-existing conditions, and almost all
of the people who had died at the very at a very old age, just
like in Italy, meaning they had lived beyond their average life
expectancy.
In this context, the following should also be mentioned: the
German RKI - that is, again the equivalent of the CDC - had
initially, strangely enough, recommended that no autopsies be
performed.
And there are
numerous credible reports that doctors and hospitals worldwide
had been paid money for declaring a deceased person a victim of
Covid-19 rather than writing down the true cause of death on the
death certificate, for example a heart attack or a gunshot
wound. Without the autopsies, we would never know that the
overwhelming majority of the alleged Covid-19 victims had died
of completely different diseases, but not of Covid-19.
The assertion that the lockdown was necessary because there were
so many different infections with SARS-COV-2, and because the
healthcare systems would be overwhelmed is wrong for three
reasons, as we have learned from the hearings we conducted with
the Corona Committee, and from other data that has become
available in the meantime:
A. The lockdown
was imposed when the virus was already retreating. By the
time the lockdown was imposed, the alleged infection rates
were already dropping again.
B. There’s already protection from the virus because of
cross- or T-cell immunity. Apart from the above mentioned
lockdown being imposed when the infection rates were already
dropping, there is also cross- or T-cell immunity in the
general population against the corona viruses contained in
every flu or influenza wave. This is true, even if this time
around, a slightly different strain of the coronavirus was
at work. And that is because the body’s own immune system
remembers every virus it has ever battled in the past, and
from this experience, it also recognizes a supposedly new,
but still similar, strain of the virus from the corona
family. Incidentally, that’s how the PCR test for the
detection of an infection was invented by now infamous
Professor Drosten.
At the beginning of January of 2020, based on this very
basic knowledge, Mr. Drosten developed his PCR test, which
supposedly detects an infection with SARS-COV-2, without
ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China, only
having learned from social media reports that there was
something going on in Wuhan, he started tinkering on his
computer with what would become his corona PCR test. For
this, he used an old SARS virus, hoping it would be
sufficiently similar to the allegedly new strain of the
coronavirus found in Wuhan. Then, he sent the result of his
computer tinkering to China to determine whether the victims
of the alleged new coronavirus tested positive. They did.
And that was enough for the World Health Organization to
sound the pandemic alarm and to recommend the worldwide use
of the Drosten PCR test for the detection of infections with
the virus now called SARS-COV-2. Drosten’s opinion and
advice was - this must be emphasized once again - the only
source for the German government when it announced the
lockdown as well as the rules for social distancing and the
mandatory wearing of masks. And - this must also be
emphasized once again - Germany apparently became the center
of especially massive lobbying by the pharmaceutical and
tech industry because the world, with reference to the
allegedly disciplined Germans, should do as the Germans do
in order to survive the pandemic.
C. And this is the most important part of our fact-finding:
the PCR test is being used on the basis of false statements,
NOT based on scientific facts with respect to infections. In
the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary
to the assertions of Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do
NOT give any indication of an infection with any virus, let
alone an infection with SARS-COV-2.
Not only are PCR
tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is
correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the
inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly
emphasized. Instead, they’re simply incapable of diagnosing any
disease.
That is: contrary to
the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have
been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive
PCR-test result does not mean that an infection is present. If
someone tests positive, it does NOT mean that they’re infected
with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-COV-2 virus.
Even the United States CDC, even this institution agrees with
this, and I quote directly from page 38 of one of its
publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests, dated July
13, 2020.
First bullet point
says:
"Detection of
viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus
or that 2019 nCOV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent
for clinical symptoms."
Second bullet point
says:
"The performance
of this test has not been established for monitoring
treatment of 2019 nCOV infection."
Third bullet point
says:
"This test cannot
rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral
pathogens."
It is still not clear
whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation
of the Wuhan virus, so that nobody knows exactly what we’re
looking for when we test, especially since this virus, just like
the flu viruses, mutates quickly.
The PCR swabs take
one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the
human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to
make it visible. Everything over 35 cycles is - as reported by
the New York Times and others - considered completely unreliable
and scientifically unjustifiable. However, the Drosten test, as
well as the WHO-recommended tests that followed his example, are
set to 45 cycles.
Can that be because
of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible
and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a
large number of infections have been detected?
The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter.
That means that a positive result may happen because the test
detects, for example, a piece of debris, a fragment of a
molecule, which may signal nothing else than that the immune
system of the person tested won a battle with a common cold in
the past.
Even Drosten himself declared in an interview with a German
business magazine in 2014, at that time concerning the alleged
detection of an infection with the MERS virus, allegedly with
the help of the PCR test, that these PCR tests are so highly
sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may
test positive.
At that time, he also became very much aware of the powerful
role of a panic and fear-mongering media, as you’ll see at the
end of the following quote. He said then, in this interview:
"If, for example, such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucosa
of a nurse for a day or so without her getting sick or noticing
anything, then she’s suddenly a MERS case. This could also
explain the explosion of case numbers in Saudi Arabia. In
addition, the media there have made this into an incredible
sensation."
Has he forgotten this? Or is he deliberately concealing this in
the corona context because corona is a very lucrative business
opportunity for the pharmaceutical industry as a whole?
And for Mr. Alford
Lund, his co-author in many studies and also a PCR-test
producer. In my view, it is completely implausible that he
forgot in 2020 what he knew about the PCR tests and told the
business magazine in 2014.
In short, this test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all
false claims stating that it can. An infection, a so-called
"hot" infection, requires that the virus, or rather a fragment
of a molecule which may be a virus, is not just found somewhere,
for example, in the throat of a person without causing any
damage - that would be a "cold" infection.
Rather, a "hot"
infection requires that the virus penetrates into the cells,
replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore
throat. Only then is a person really infected in the sense of a
"hot" infection, because only then is a person contagious, that
is, able to infect others. Until then, it is completely harmless
for both the host and all other people that the host comes into
contact with.
Once again, this means that positive test results, contrary to
all other claims by Drosten, Wieler, or the WHO, mean nothing
with respect to infections, as even the CDC knows, as quoted
above.
Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists worldwide
assume that there has never been a corona pandemic, but only a
PCR-test pandemic. This is the conclusion reached by many German
scientists, such as professors Bhakti, Reiss, Mölling, Hockertz,
Walach and many others, including the above-mentioned Professor
John Ioannidis, and the Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt
from Stanford University.
The most recent such opinion is that of the aforementioned Dr.
Mike Yeadon, a former Vice-President and Chief Science Officer
at Pfizer, who held this position for 16 years. He and his
co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific
paper in September of 2020 and he wrote a corresponding magazine
article on September 20, 2020.
Among other things,
he and they state - and I quote:
"We’re basing our
government policy, our economic policy, and the policy of
restricting fundamental rights, presumably on completely
wrong data and assumptions about the coronavirus. If it
weren’t for the test results that are constantly reported in
the media, the pandemic would be over because nothing really
happened.
Of course, there
are some serious individual cases of illness, but there are
also some in every flu epidemic. There was a real wave of
disease in March and April, but since then, everything has
gone back to normal. Only the positive results rise and sink
wildly again and again, depending on how many tests are
carried out.
But the real
cases of illnesses are over. There can be no talk of a
second wave. The allegedly new strain of the coronavirus is
…"
Dr. Yeadon continues,
"… only new in
that it is a new type of the long-known corona virus. There
are at least four coronaviruses that are endemic and cause
some of the common colds we experience, especially in
winter.
They all have a
striking sequence similarity to the coronavirus, and because
the human immune system recognizes the similarity to the
virus that has now allegedly been newly discovered, a T-cell
immunity has long existed in this respect. 30 per cent of
the population had this before the allegedly new virus even
appeared.
Therefore, it is
sufficient for the so-called herd immunity that 15 to 25 per
cent of the population are infected with the allegedly new
coronavirus to stop the further spread of the virus. And
this has long been the case."
Regarding the
all-important PCR tests, Yeadon writes, in a piece called "Lies,
Damned Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False
Positives", dated September 20, 2020, and I quote
"The likelihood
of an apparently positive case being a false positive is
between 89 to 94 per cent, or near certainty."
Dr. Yeadon, in
agreement with the professors of immunology Kamera from Germany,
Kappel from the Netherlands, and Cahill from Ireland, as well as
the microbiologist Dr. Arve from Austria, all of whom testified
before the German Corona Committee, explicitly points out that a
positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been found.
The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is
- and I quote:
"Simply the
presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact
virus, which could be a piece of dead virus, which cannot
make the subject sick, and cannot be transmitted, and cannot
make anyone else sick."
Because of the
complete unsuitability of the test for the detection of
infectious diseases - tested positive in goats, sheep, papayas
and even chicken wings - Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan,
Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, writes that
the Covid virus would never disappear if this test practice were
to be continued, but would always be falsely detected in much of
what is tested.
Lockdowns, as Yeadon
and his colleagues found out, do not work.
Sweden, with its laissez-faire approach, and Great Britain, with
its strict lockdown, for example, have completely comparable
disease and mortality statistics. The same was found by US
scientists concerning the different US states. It makes no
difference to the incidence of disease whether a state
implements a lockdown or not.
With regard to the now infamous Imperial College of London’s
Professor Neil Ferguson and his completely false computer models
warning of millions of deaths, he says that - and I quote:
"No serious
scientist gives any validity to Ferguson’s model." He points
out with thinly veiled contempt - again I quote:
"It’s important that you know, most scientists don’t accept
that it …" - that is, Ferguson’s model - "was even faintly
right. But the government is still wedded to the model."
Ferguson predicted 40
thousand corona deaths in Sweden by May and 100 thousand by
June, but it remained at 5,800 which, according to the Swedish
authorities, is equivalent to a mild flu.
If the PCR tests had not been used as a diagnostic tool for
corona infections, there would not be a pandemic and there would
be no lockdowns, but everything would have been perceived as
just a medium or light wave of influenza, these scientists
conclude.
Dr. Yeadon in his
piece, "Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly
Danger of False Positives, writes:
"This test is
fatally flawed and must immediately be withdrawn and never
used again in this setting, unless shown to be fixed." And,
towards the end of that article, "I have explained how a
hopelessly performing diagnostic test has been, and
continues to be used, not for diagnosis of disease, but it
seems solely to create fear".
Now let’s take a look
at the current actual situation regarding the severe damage
caused by the lockdowns and other measures. Another detailed
paper, written by a German official in the Department of the
Interior, who is responsible for risk assessment and the
protection of the population against risks, was leaked recently.
It is now called the "False Alarm" paper.
This paper comes to
the conclusion that there was that there was and is no
sufficient evidence for serious health risks for the population
as claimed by Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, but - the author says
- there’s very much evidence of the corona measures causing
gigantic health and economic damage to the population, which he
then describes in detail in this paper.
This, he concludes,
will lead to very high claims for damages, which the government
will be held responsible for. This has now become reality, but
the paper’s author was suspended.
More and more scientists, but also lawyers, recognize that, as a
result of the deliberate panic-mongering, and the corona
measures enabled by this panic, democracy is in great danger of
being replaced by fascist totalitarian models.
As I already
mentioned above, in Australia, people who do not wear the masks,
which more and more studies show, are hazardous to health, or
who allegedly do not wear them correctly, are arrested,
handcuffed and thrown into jail.
In the Philippines, they run the risk of getting shot, but even
in Germany and in other previously civilized countries, children
are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with
quarantine regulations, distance regulations, and mask-wearing
regulations.
According to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified
before the Corona Committee, children are traumatized en masse,
with the worst psychological consequences yet to be expected in
the medium- and long-term. In Germany alone, to bankruptcies are
expected in the fall to strike small- and medium-sized
businesses, which form the backbone of the economy.
This will result in
incalculable tax losses and incalculably high and long-term
social security money transfers for - among other things -
unemployment benefits.
Since, in the meantime, pretty much everybody is beginning to
understand the full devastating impact of the completely
unfounded corona measures, I will refrain from detailing this
any further.
Let me now give you a summary of the legal consequences. The
most difficult part of a lawyer’s work is always to establish
the true facts, not the application of the legal rules to these
facts. Unfortunately, a German lawyer does not learn this at law
school but his Anglo-American counterparts do get the necessary
training for this at their law schools.
And probably for this
reason, but also because of the much more pronounced
independence of the Anglo-American judiciary, the Anglo-American
law of evidence is much more effective in practice than the
German one.
A court of law can only decide a legal dispute correctly if it
has previously determined the facts correctly, which is not
possible without looking at all the evidence. And that’s why the
law of evidence is so important. On the basis of the facts
summarized above, in particular those established with the help
of the work of the German Corona Committee, the legal evaluation
is actually simple.
It is simple for all
civilized legal systems, regardless of whether these legal
systems are based on civil law, which follows the Roman law more
closely, or whether they are based on Anglo-American common law,
which is only loosely connected to Roman law.
Let’s first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the
measures. A number of German law professors, including
professors Kingreen, Morswig, Jungbluth and Vosgerau have
stated, either in written expert opinions or in interviews, in
line with the serious doubts expressed by the former president
of the federal constitutional court with respect to the
constitutionality of the corona measures, that these measures -
the corona measures - are without a sufficient factual basis,
and also without a sufficient legal basis, and are therefore
unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately.
Very recently, a judge, Thorsten Schleif is his name, declared
publicly that the German judiciary, just like the general
public, has been so panic-stricken that it was no longer able to
administer justice properly.
He says that the
courts of law - and I quote,
"have all too
quickly waved through coercive measures which, for millions
of people all over Germany, represent massive suspensions of
their constitutional rights. He points out that German
citizens - again I quote - "are currently experiencing the
most serious encroachment on their constitutional rights
since the founding of the federal republic of Germany in
1949".
In order to contain
the corona pandemic, federal and state governments have
intervened, he says, massively, and in part threatening the very
existence of the country as it is guaranteed by the
constitutional rights of the people.
What about fraud, intentional infliction of damage and crimes
against humanity?
Based on the rules of criminal law, asserting false facts
concerning the PCR tests or intentional misrepresentation, as it
was committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and WHO, as well as the
WHO, can only be assessed as fraud. Based on the rules of civil
tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage.
The German professor
of civil law, Martin Schwab, supports this finding in public
interviews. In a comprehensive legal opinion of around 180
pages, he has familiarized himself with the subject matter like
no other legal scholar has done thus far and, in particular, has
provided a detailed account of the complete failure of the
mainstream media to report on the true facts of this so-called
pandemic.
Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and Tedros of the WHO all knew, based on
their own expertise or the expertise of their institutions, that
the PCR tests cannot provide any information about infections,
but asserted over and over again to the general public that they
can, with their counterparts all over the world repeating this.
And they all knew and
accepted that, on the basis of their recommendations, the
governments of the world would decide on lockdowns, the rules
for social distancing, and mandatory wearing of masks, the
latter representing a very serious health hazard, as more and
more independent studies and expert statements show.
Under the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been
harmed by these PCR-test-induced lockdowns are entitled to
receive full compensation for their losses. In particular, there
is a duty to compensate - that is, a duty to pay damages for the
loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed employed
persons as a result of the lockdown and other measures.
In the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused,
and continue to cause, such devastating damage to the world
population’s health and economy that the crimes committed by
Messrs.
Drosten, Wieler and
the WHO must be legally qualified as actual crimes against
humanity, as defined in section 7 of the International Criminal
Code.
How can we do something? What can we do? Well, the class action
is the best route to compensatory damages and to political
consequences. The so-called class action lawsuit is based on
English law and exists today in the USA and in Canada.
It enables a court of
law to allow a complaint for damages to be tried as a class
action lawsuit at the request of a plaintiff if:
As a result of a
damage-inducing event …
A large number of people suffer the same type of damage.
Phrased differently,
a judge can allow a class-action lawsuit to go forward if common
questions of law and fact make up the vital component of the
lawsuit. Here, the common questions of law and fact revolve
around the worldwide PCR-test-based lockdowns and its
consequences.
Just like the VW
diesel passenger cars were functioning products, but they were
defective due to a so-called defeat device because they didn’t
comply with the emissions standards, so too the PCR tests -
which are perfectly good products in other settings - are
defective products when it comes to the diagnosis of infections.
Now, if an American or Canadian company or an American or
Canadian individual decides to sue these persons in the United
States or Canada for damages, then the court called upon to
resolve this dispute may, upon request, allow this complaint to
be tried as a class action lawsuit.
If this happens, all affected parties worldwide will be informed
about this through publications in the mainstream media and will
thus have the opportunity to join this class action within a
certain period of time, to be determined by the court. It should
be emphasized that nobody must join the class action, but every
injured party can join the class.
The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is
needed, namely to try the complaint of a representative
plaintiff who is affected in a manner typical of everyone else
in the class. This is, firstly, cheaper, and secondly, faster
than hundreds of thousands or more individual lawsuits.
And thirdly, it
imposes less of a burden on the courts. Fourthly, as a rule it
allows a much more precise examination of the accusations than
would be possible in the context of hundreds of thousands, or
more likely in this corona setting, even millions of individual
lawsuits.
In particular, the well-established and proven Anglo-American
law of evidence, with its pre-trial discovery, is applicable.
This requires that all evidence relevant for the determination
of the lawsuit is put on the table. In contrast to the typical
situation in German lawsuits with structural imbalance, that is,
lawsuits involving on the one hand a consumer, and on the other
hand a powerful corporation, the withholding or even destruction
of evidence is not without consequence; rather the party
withholding or even destroying evidence loses the case under
these evidence rules.
Here in Germany, a group of tort lawyers have banded together to
help their clients with recovery of damages. They have provided
all relevant information and forms for German plaintiffs to both
estimate how much damage they have suffered and join the group
or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when
it goes forward either in Canada or the US.
Initially, this group
of lawyers had considered to also collect and manage the claims
for damages of other, non-German plaintiffs, but this proved to
be unmanageable.
However, through an international lawyers’ network, which is
growing larger by the day, the German group of attorneys
provides to all of their colleagues in all other countries, free
of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions
and testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot
detect infections.
And they also provide
them with all relevant information as to how they can prepare
and bundle the claims for damages of their clients so that, they
too, can assert their clients’ claims for damages, either in
their home country’s courts of law, or within the framework of
the class action, as explained above.
These scandalous corona facts, gathered mostly by the Corona
Committee and summarized above, are the very same facts that
will soon be proven to be true either in one court of law, or in
many courts of law all over the world.
These are the facts that will pull the masks off the faces of
all those responsible for these crimes.
To the politicians
who believe those corrupt people, these facts are hereby offered
as a lifeline that can help you readjust your course of action,
and start the long overdue public scientific discussion, and not
go down with those charlatans and criminals.
Thank you.
