by Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 01,
2023
from
Mercola Website
Story at-a-glance
-
The
World Health Organization's upcoming 'pandemic' treaty and
the International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments are
part of a global "soft coup" to strip nations of their
sovereignty and people of their bodily autonomy and
freedom
-
The
WHO wants to put into law a requirement that nations
must censor their citizens, so that only public health
messages aligned with the WHO's recommendations can be
shared
-
The
IHR amendments specify that the WHO will dictate which
drugs countries must use, and which they cannot, in the
event of a 'pandemic' - and possibly outside of pandemics
as well
-
The
IHRs have been in existence since 1969, but in the
current draft of the IHR amendments - the WHO's
recommendations - become edicts that must be followed
rather than recommendations that nations can ignore at
will
-
The
treaty demands the fast-tracking of vaccines, along with
liability waivers for vaccine manufacturers. The EU,
U.S. and CEPI have already proposed a plan to develop
vaccines in 100 days
-
The
treaty will apply to all nations that sign on, all the
time, even when there are no pandemics
We're in the
Middle of a Global Coup.
Here's How We
Stop It...
Freedom organizations around the world
are uniting for
a single cause:
to get the word
out about
how the WHO
intends to take control
over all
aspects of everyone's lives,
right down to
what you can eat,
where you can go
and what
vaccines you must get.
Find out here
how it will work...
In this interview board-certified internist and biological warfare
epidemiologist Dr.
Meryl Nass discusses the dangers posed by
the World Health Organization's (WHO) upcoming
'pandemic'
treaty and the International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments.
She also wrote
about this in a recent article titled "The
WHO's Proposed Treaty Will Increase Manmade Pandemics." 1
"I've been reading the different
drafts of the amendments and the 'pandemic' treaty that have been
put forward," she
says.
"They're a mix of things,
different ideas put forward by the different [member] countries.
And then there's a group within the WHO that tries to harmonize
them, and also make sure that what the WHO wants is in them.
I had finally read through, line
by line, the June 2nd, most recent draft of a
'pandemic' treaty, and it had things that were much worse and more
explicit in it than before, and I felt compelled to start
writing about it.
Then, after I'd written a short
piece, I realized it was too important and I needed to write a
long piece with background and links, and try to get the message
out to a lot of people.
Because the only reason these
documents and the plan - the biosecurity agenda through the
'pandemic' treaty and the International Health Amendments - have
gotten as far as they have is because nobody has read them.
[People] don't understand what the
plan is, and may not understand the back-story."
Converging Agendas With
Identical Goals
It's important to
realize that many different aspects of the grand plan are being put
into motion by a variety of sectors and globalist organizations at
the same time, and while they may appear independent of each other,
they're all leading us in the same direction, toward a unified goal,
namely,
We have development
of a new financial apparatus involving the rollout of a
central bank digital currency (CBDC),
for example.
"At the same time,
the U.N. also
wants into the action,"
Nass says.
"It wants to be able to declare
global shocks and manage them. And those could be the ones that
the WHO wants to manage, which is biological warfare and
pandemics that occur in more than one country.
So, the U.N. has listed those two,
but also all sorts of other potential global shocks, like
climate change, supply chain interruptions, cyber events, and
even events in outer space.
And they finalize it with black
swan events, which means anything the U.N. wants to designate as
a global shock can be one, and then the U.N. will come out with
its management of that event.
So, the secretary general of the
U.N. (António
Guterres) is asking its members... at the annual meeting of the U.N.
General Assembly, to give it permission to create this global
emergencies platform... which will give the secretary general
and the U.N. authority to manage global shocks.
Also at that meeting, the WHO and
the U.N. are coming together to try to divvy up how things are
going to go for biological warfare and pandemics that affect
more than one country.
So, look for information coming
out on that on September 20."
Why Was the 'pandemic'
Treaty Introduced?
The WHO proposed
the initial plan to grant itself the power to issue global emergency
instructions in 2021.
The claim was that
nations had handled the COVID 'pandemic' so poorly, we need a
centralized organization to manage the next 'pandemic' better.
"Of course, it was laid out in
terms of equity, like the rich countries didn't give the poor
countries enough vaccines, etc... and so many people died.
What is never said is that, in
fact, almost all the countries of the world were following the
WHO's guidance, and that is what caused
this last 'pandemic' to be
so devastating.
The economic implications were all
as a result of the lockdowns, the resulting supply chain
interruptions, the closure of schools, etc.
So, although the WHO wants this
great power, it hasn't said that it's going to do anything
differently.
Nobody at the level of the WHO,
the U.N., or the United States public health authorities or the
president has said they did anything wrong.
What they want to do is more of
the same, and I mean more, lots more,"
Nass says.
WHO Wants To Be a
Centralized Ruler of All
For example, they
want to put into law the requirement that nations must censor their
citizens, so that only public health messages aligned with the WHO's
recommendations can be shared.
Already, YouTube
has announced they will henceforth censor all health information
that does not conform to the WHO's narrative. But that censorship is
nothing compared to what's to come.
The amendments to
the International Health Regulations (IHRs) also specify that
the WHO will dictate,
which drugs countries must use, and which they
cannot, in the event of a 'pandemic' - and possibly outside of
pandemics as well...
As explained by
Nass:
"The 'pandemic' treaty... is a
completely new document, and each draft has been different than
the one before. In the current draft, the director general of
the WHO doesn't even need to declare a 'pandemic'.
The 'pandemic' treaty will be in
effect all the time."
The IHRs have been
in existence since 1969, but in the current draft of the IHR
amendments, the WHO's recommendations become edicts that must be
followed rather than recommendations that nations can ignore at
will.
In their current
form, the amendments do require the director-general of the WHO to
declare a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC)
before he can start giving orders, but there are no standards for
what a PHEIC is.
It could be
anything.
He would also have
the power to declare a "potential" 'pandemic', even with limited or no
evidence.
All Vaccines Will Be
Fast-Tracked and Untested
The treaty also
demands the fast-tracking of vaccines, along with liability waivers
for vaccine manufacturers.
According to
Nass,
...have already proposed a plan to
develop vaccines in 100 days and manufacture enough for everyone in
the country in another 30 days.
"It's a completely crazy idea
because you don't have time to test the vaccines in human beings
if you're developing them in 100 days,"
Nass says.
"The COVID vaccines were developed
in 326 days... That was
the Pfizer vaccine. And the
median testing in humans was only two months or less.
We gave the vaccines to billions of people, and we only found
out later what the side effects were. We still don't have a
totally clear view of all the side effects and how often they
occur, because our countries have
hidden the data...!
Today, when FDA is letting things
get through right and left without good tests,
It's hard to make a good vaccine.
Many have to be thrown away before
you get to a safe and effective one.
That is, unless you have a
complete waiver of liability, and then you can inject people
with anything. And there are no manufacturing standards, no
safety standard, no efficacy standard.
The only 'standard' is that
the
FDA commissioner needs to hope that the benefits outweigh the
risks."
Never-Ending Pandemics
Ahead
Both the treaty and
the IHR amendments require nations to perform extensive
biosurveillance, year-round, and perform genomic sequencing on all
pathogens collected.
Well, if we're
testing people, livestock, wild animals, farms and factories all the
time, we'll always be able to find pathogens with 'pandemic'
potential.
So, this will give
rise to a never-ending series of 'pandemic' and "potential
pandemic"
declarations. Any and all of these declarations could then result in
lockdowns and new vaccine requirements.
And, importantly,
these documents will supersede all domestic laws if implemented, so
not even the U.S. Constitution will be able to save us.
Door To Freedom
To prevent this
nightmare, Nass has founded a new organization called Door To
Freedom (doortofreedom.org),
which seeks to educate people around the world about what the
'pandemic' treaty and IHR amendments are, and how they will change
life as we know it, and strip us of every vestige of freedom.
Door To Freedom
has created a poster to explain the impacts the 'pandemic' treaty and
IHR amendments will have.
Source
Please
download this poster and share it with everyone you know.
Also put it up on
public billboards and places where communities share information.
"The WHO appears to be nervous
about the fact that some of these bits of information are in
fact making it into the mainstream,"
Nass says,
"and so they themselves have made
little short videos with
Tedros and other people at
the WHO denying that this is a sovereignty grab - claiming that
the WHO is not even going to be a party of the treaty, etc.
Most of their claims are lies. So,
it will be confusing.
But the WHO is definitely a party
to this treaty. The WHO intends - in the June 2, 2023, version,
which is called the
Bureau Draft
- to take management of certain aspects of 'pandemic' control."
Who Will Vote on the
Treaty and IHR Amendments?
The IHR amendments
will only require a 50% vote of whoever is in the room at the time
of the vote, which will take place at the World Health Assembly's
annual meeting in May 2024. 2
Countries will then
have only 10 months to send a formal opt-out to the WHO if the
amendments pass. Barring an opt-out, all countries will then be
required to comply with WHO directives.
Nations that have
not officially opted out will then be bound by the new terms laid
out in the amendments.
The 'pandemic' treaty
will also be voted on during that meeting. It will require
two-thirds vote in favor by the members that are in the room and
will go into effect one month after 30 nations have ratified it.
The amendments
require an active opt-out, while the treaty requires an active
opt-in.
Any nation that has
not signed the treaty will be excluded from its terms.
Those who sign the
treaty must wait three years before they can get out.
"That's important to remember,
because I don't think too many people want to give the WHO three
years of directing them how to manage public health emergencies
before they can can say no,"
Nass says.
It is important to
be aware that the treaty will be in force all the time.
It won't require a
'pandemic' to give the WHO director-general the power to surveil and
censor the entire world, 24/7. Furthermore, as currently drafted,
the treaty has essentially blank pages, to be filled in later...
New committees will
form, and they will determine how the treaty provisions will be
carried out and enforced. They can add new provisions too.
This is like giving
a blank check to the WHO to impose whatever it wants on the world's
people.
Action Items
While the situation
seems incredibly bleak, Nass insists there are many things we can do
to prevent the WHO's power grab, including the following:
-
Call
your congressman or congresswoman and urge them to
sponsor
H.R.79 - The WHO Withdrawal Act, 3
introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, which calls for
defunding and exiting the WHO.
At the
time of this writing, it has 51 cosponsors, all of them
Republicans.
We
cannot get this bill passed without Democrats, so we
need to get them to understand what's at stake.
As
noted by Nass:
"That means 51
congressmen have already been convinced about how
bad this is. We the people have to get educated and
then push it out to more members of Congress.
These provisions are
so terrible, if you stand up in front of a room and
say,
'My congresswoman
is voting to give away our sovereignty, to have
the WHO take away our medications, to transfer
our intellectual property to other nations,'
everyone will say 'That person is terrible.'
So, there's a lot of
opportunity to embarrass your members of Congress if
they don't understand what this is and vote to get
out. I think that's our best bet."
The Sovereignty Coalition
is making it easier for everyone to make their voices
heard.
Its
Help the House Defund the WHO page will allow you to
contact all of your elected representatives with just a
few clicks.
Simply
fill out the required field, click submit, and your
contact information will be used to match you with your
elected representatives.
In 2021, the
U.S. introduced several new amendments that were rejected by
other nations, so when it came to a vote in 2022, the U.S.
rescinded most of them.
If we can make
enough noise and get a wellspring of people to push back, saying
we will not accept these terms, many of the amendments may
simply be withdrawn before they come to a vote in 2024.
The WHO is
trying to achieve this soft coup on the sly, and exposing,
how
these amendments will eliminate human rights and bodily
autonomy, and strip our nation of its sovereignty, will force
them to take a step back, because while they are tyrants, they
don't want to be identified as such.
We Must Stop the Funding
of Our Demise
Also be sure to
sign up for Door To Freedom's newsletter so that you can take
action when WHO-related bills come up.
We need to oppose
all funding of the global biosecurity agenda, and Door To Freedom
will alert you when it's time to call on your representatives to
oppose funding measures that will further the biosecurity agenda.
Other newsletters
that will help you stay abreast on this issue are
Children's Health Defense and
Stand
for Health Freedom.
The U.S. has
already contributed money to a financial intermediary fund set up
through the
WHO and the
World Bank.
But that fund
is still many billions short of what it wants, so the WHO is
looking for member states to dramatically increase their
contributions...
The U.S. also
committed $5 billion over five years to the global biosecurity
agenda when it passed the National Defense Authorization Act in
December 2022.
So, those
contributions are now part of U.S. law, and they're part of Biden's
proposed budget for 2024.
Another $20 billion
in mandated spending by the Department of Health and Human Services
has been requested in the president's FY 2024 budget request to
Congress for International 'pandemic' Preparedness.
More money will
also be allocated for this purpose by the Departments of Defense and
Homeland Security.
Additional funds
may also be allocated through the State Department, USAID, the
Department of Agriculture and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
In all, the U.S. is
already set to spend some $30 billion a year on global 'pandemic'
preparedness, and part of that is for surveillance of our social
media and the internet, and biosurveillance for pathogens with
'pandemic' potential.
It seems that with
so much money sloshing around, a large number of vested interests
support the WHO plan.
However, when we
citizens reach out en masse, politicians oftentimes are compelled to
appease their constituents, especially when it comes to turning over
state and federal authority for health to unelected officials of the
WHO, an organization well-known for corruption, which unabashedly
caters to its biggest 'donors', particularly
Bill Gates.
A recent example is
offered by Nass:
"There's a group called the
Sovereignty Coalition
that we are part of.
They have the ALIGN Act software
and this enables people going to their website, with two or
three clicks, to send needed messages to the president, your
congressman, senators, governors, etc., and that was used.
So, when the funding bill came up
a month or two ago for the State Department - and funding for
the WHO is in that bill - the Republicans had cut funding in
their markup, because... we got over 4,000 calls and emails to
every member of the committee the night before."
So, thanks to that
outreach, the State Department Foreign Operations
appropriations bill draft now has zero funding for the WHO in it.
As noted by Nass:
"Now that is extraordinary.
I'm sure they're going to try to
sneak it in somewhere else, but right now the United States has
defunded the WHO in the pending legislation, which needs to be
voted on, I believe by the end of October.
Stand for Health Freedom also has
something like that, and Children's Health Defense also has
ALIGN Act software. So, we can make this happen.
When bills are coming up, when
important things are happening, we can get out the action alerts
and get people to take action. That's already in place.
It's tremendously important, and
we'll continue to do that."
We Must Connect the Dots
for People
A common question
is,
Who
is responsible for this global coup?
Also, who's in
charge of it?
And why are
they doing it, exactly...?
"The answer is, we don't know
who's doing it,"
Nass says,
"but we know there are some
very evil, rich people that are [part of it].
We know that
Klaus Schwab
is part of their apparatus.
We know that the World
Economic Forum's
Young Global Leaders - that Schwab has
raised up for the last 30 years - are a big part of
implementing these things in their countries...
They're like a large
Skull and Bones
club where they work together.
They come together for
meetings, and their job is to elevate each other into
powerful positions in industry and government... So, we have
to make people aware of the role of these secret societies,
and how they are being used to bring in bad programs.
People are already noticing
the terrible inflation in the United States, and that's due
to the money printing.
They had to do the money
printing to bribe the schools, the hospitals, the
industries, the pharmaceutical makers, and
the media in
particular, to push this whole 'pandemic' narrative through
and make us do what they wanted.
Now everybody thinks we're
coming up for another 'pandemic' soon.
The FDA is pushing out a new
COVID vaccine in the middle of September.
What are they going to do
to us next?
Are they going to be able
to print money again and dole out $10 trillion of our
grandchildren's money?
I think people are starting to
understand this money printing inflationary spiral, and how
it impoverishes us for the benefit of a small group.
Those are bits of information
- what is needed is connecting the dots. So, in my article,
I tried to connect a lot of dots...
Everything in our lives is
changing at the same time and people are so confused. We
need those who are paying close attention and know how to
write to start explaining how these things are connected.
We've got nine months until
the WHO will vote on these two documents...
At the beginning of May, I was
invited to the
International COVID Summit at the European
Parliament
in Brussels, and my talk was on the IHR
amendments.
I prepared a 10-minute talk...
but at the last minute the sponsors said,
'Look, you only
have five minutes because we've run over'...
So, I'm like,
'Oh my God, what do I do?'
I looked at my slides; what are
the main points?
And I gave a five-minute talk.
I thought it must be terrible...
Well, somebody made a
three-minute, and somebody made a four-minute, and a
five-minute little video of it and sent it around on Twitter
and TikTok:
Now people have added sound
and they've added images.
The thing has garnered
millions of views. It's extraordinary.
But it's because I start off
saying,
'We are experiencing a
soft coup. This is what's happening. This is what the
WHO is doing.'
And it's so short, people are
able to watch it.
They see this little old lady
who is speaking in a very measured way, and they see the
European Parliament insignia behind me, and they're saying,
'Oh my god, maybe this is
real.'
So that little thing has
gotten 5 million to 10 million views and TikTokers are now
adding to it. So, I think this whole issue of the WHO trying
to grab our sovereignty is very meaningful to people.
We just have to figure out the
right messages, get them out there, and we'll win."
Where to Learn More
Door To Freedom
is unique in that it is trying to introduce these highly complex,
interlocking aspects of the global power grab in bite-sized pieces.
The website has
dozens of short summary articles and videos, with longer in-depth
pieces for those who want to dive deeper.
We also publish
each new draft of the IHR amendments and the treaty as they come
out, and I encourage people to have a look at the actual documents.
So, to get a good
grasp of what's at stake, be sure to bookmark
doortofreedom.org, and start sifting through it.
Also, share the
site with others and encourage them to learn more.
"We've put up the documents so
people can read them,"
Nass says.
"We have about 30 two-minute reads
about the documents, about what's going on, about all sorts of
things, trying to connect the dots on transhumanism, CBDCs,
child sex education.
And we have a large number of
longer articles about related subjects.
So if you go to the site, it will
give you an education about the massive global changes that the
globalist cabal is bringing forward right now.
As we speak, we're in the middle
of the coup. The coup isn't next year. It's not when these
documents get voted on. We're in the middle of it now. The
documents are part of it.
Once we've completed everything on
the website... we will start building a worldwide coalition of
organizations to fight all of this. That's the next step.
Children's Health Defense... are
taking up this issue of the WHO, and there are many other
organizations I'm working with: Stand for Health Freedom,
organizations in England, in the European Union [and] South
Africa...
We want to then start pushing
regular messaging to the world that will be the same everywhere.
Education is the answer, because
even if we beat back the WHO, if we don't beat back this entire
agenda, the globalists will hit us with something else, either
through the U.N. or through other multilateral organizations, or
through national laws that are draconian.
[We must] make people understand
what's happened over these last few years, where it's coming
from, what led up to it and where it's going. And I think that's
the best we can do. It's really important that we retain our
ethics, our morals.
We don't want to manipulate
people.
We've all been manipulated, we've
been mind-controlled. The media, the advertising, the education
system have all been trying to limit the way people think...
We want you to open your minds, be
able to identify propaganda when you see it, so that you can
learn to think clearly for yourself...
That's when we win."
Video
Download Interview Transcript
Video Link
Sources and References
|