by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Is Nibiru going to appear in April, 2003 as is being claimed by
certain New Age Gurus?
In a word, NO. And you can take that to the bank.
It is part of a
designed to drive believers over the edge and force legislation
against alternative ideas, research, and the free exchange of
information over the internet.
It is part of
Remember Hale Bopp? Remember Heaven's
Gate? Have we learned anything?
Read the following articles very carefully. Indeed,
Earth will very
likely experience cataclysms at some point in the future, but it
won't be because of the Planet Nibiru, and it isn't going to be in
2003. See also
Richard Hoagland's comments on the rumor of the
return of Nibiru. We couldn't have said it better.
COINTELPRO is at work in the New Age!
COINTELPRO was the FBI's secret program to undermine the popular
upsurge which swept the country during the 1960s. Though the name
stands for "Counterintelligence Program," the targets were not enemy
spies. The FBI set out to eliminate "radical" political opposition
inside the US.
When traditional modes of repression (exposure,
blatant harassment, and prosecution for political crimes) failed to
counter the growing insurgency, and even helped to fuel it, the
Bureau took the law into its own hands and secretly used fraud and
force to sabotage constitutionally - protected political activity.
Its methods ranged far beyond surveillance, and amounted to a
domestic version of the covert action for which the CIA has become
infamous throughout the world.
In recent years, the FBI and other agencies have tried to clean up
their image. They have engaged in careful concealment of post-COINTELPRO
domestic counterintelligence operations. This effort has sold the
"new FBI" to some of the most prominent critics of earlier
University professors and congressional committees that
helped to expose the domestic covert action of the past now deny its
persistence in the present. Because of their credentials, these
respectable "objective" sources do more damage than the FBI's
blatant right- wing publicists. Left uncontested, their sophistry
could disarm a new generation of activists, leaving them vulnerable
to government subversion.
In addition to political activists, it seems that COINTELPRO has
particularly targeted groups that are seeking the truth about the
interactions between the US government and Ultra Terrestrials, or
so-called "aliens - denizens of hyperdimensional realities."
The COINTELPRO files show the U.S. government targeting a very broad
range of religious, labor and community groups opposed to any of its
agendas, and it would be foolish to not realize that this very
operation extends to the US cover-up of its "alien agenda."
The presence of a COINTELPRO operation also goes far in explaining
why, when the sincere researcher enters this field, he or she
discovers only lies, lies, and more lies. Confusion and
disinformation. And it is clearly deliberate, promulgated by
Metaphysical Mavens and New Age Impresarios - COINTELPRO agents, all
The objective seems to be to attack and "neutralize" those who are
seeking the answers by marginalization, by conversion to wild
beliefs that later "fall through," and perhaps even by generating
conditions that force legislation against alternative research. The
Hale-Bopp Flopp is a case in point.
One more incident of wild promulgation of End of the World ideas
that lead to erratic or fanatical behavior in any group of people,
and the free exchange of ideas on the internet will come to a
screeching, legislated halt. Count on it.
As we have delved deeper into our investigation of the series of
attacks launched against us personally, and our work and our
discussion/research group, the reality of continuing COINTELPRO-type
attacks on progressive thinking became more and more evident. As we
published these files, we received further information from other
researchers that they, too, had been subjected to identical
Ongoing domestic covert action is more than amply documented by
The COINTELPRO Papers, Agents of Repression and War at Home.
What we are
discovering is that the targets are not limited to the opponents of
U.S. political policies. Oh, no! They have developed COINTELPRO to
an all new level of Social Shaping, Cultural Brainwashing, and this
includes virtually anyone who is seeking the truth about the
shifting realities of our world.
The cases of COINTELPRO activities against political groups are no
more than the tip of the iceberg, given that the great bulk of
COINTELPRO - type operations remain secret until long after their
damage has been done. By all indications, domestic covert operations
have become a permanent feature of U.S. politics, and Social
The implications of this are truly alarming. Those who manage to get
close to the truth of these matters, despite the many obstacles in
their path, face country wide covert campaigns to discredit and
disrupt their research and reputations.
Clearly, COINTELPRO and similar operations under other names work to
distort academic and popular perceptions of the problems facing our
world. They have done enormous damage to the search for the Truth.
These COINTELPRO operations are clearly formidable and dangerous.
Yet, with networking, sharing of information, and exposure of the
agents, such covert action is not insurmountable. Knowledge
"Terrorism is changing. New
adversaries, new motivations and new rationales have surfaced in
recent years to challenge much of the conventional wisdom..."
Dr. Bruce Hoffman, Director of RAND, Washington
One has to wonder why anything that
"challenges the conventional wisdom" must be considered
And how better to "take care" of those who challenge the
"conventional wisdom," the "control system," than by making it a
crime to "think out of the box?" And how to make it a crime?
Machiavelli wrote the manual. All you have to do is create or
infiltrate groups that supposedly "think out of the box," then
subvert them or drive them to irrational acts, or even commit
terrorist acts in their names, and there you have it!
COINTELPRO prepares the ground, so to speak, so that terrorism is
more effective. You could call them the "opening acts" of the main
attraction, sent in to soften up the audience. They are the "sales
team" that sell the ideas upon which the later acts of terrorism
depend for effectiveness.
They are here, now, in our world in the
guise of Promulgators of End of the World and Conspiracy Theories,
and running New Age Circuses, seminars, work-shops and "methods" or
techniques for "ascension," or accomplishing any of a dozen occult
or purported spiritual aims.
They are the new phase of COINTELPRO.
Schools, workshops, seminars, conferences, "workings" and just a
whole host of fun activities are utilized to part the individual
from his money, his sanity, his free will, and in some cases, even
Following the events of the bombing of the Federal Building in
Oklahoma City in March of 1995, and the Heaven's Gate massacre, not
to mention the mass suicides of Jonestown and the Solar Cult in
Europe, there exists a very real fear of Cults, and with good
The only problem is, the REAL cults are sending out "disinformation
artists and deceivers" who play on the vulnerabilities of Seekers of
Spiritual Paths and or alternative researchers into questions that
have never been satisfactorily answered by "conventional wisdom."
Beliefs in the "End of the World," the coming of the "New
Jerusalem," the boom of the Gloom and Doom market has produced rich
psychological ground for the planting of the seeds of the general
expectation for the return of SOMETHING, and thus, the need to
PREPARE. And they are all ready to sell you the right technique, the
right workshop, the right school course, the right rituals and
accoutrements, to make sure that YOU are among the CHOSEN.
Back to the original question:
Is Nibiru going to appear in April, 2003 as is being claimed by
certain New Age Gurus?
In a word, NO. It is part of
the COINTELPRO operation.
Today I received an inquiry from a panicked reader who forwarded to
me information about "Planet Nibiru" of Zecharia Sitchin fame. The
"Is it true? Have they sighted Nibiru? Is it coming?
What shall we do?"
I undertook an inquiry into the matter, carefully perusing the
referenced sites and articles, and discovered that, once again,
someone is pandering to the public's demand for sensationalism.
Now, let me say right at the start here that I do, most definitely,
admire the work and "discoveries" of
Zecharia Sitchin - as far as
He has been quoted to say:
There is one more planet in our own
solar system, not light years away, that comes between Mars and
Jupiter every 3,600 years.
People from that planet came to Earth
almost half a million years ago and did many of the things about
which we read in the Bible, in the book of Genesis. I prophesize
the return of this planet called Nibiru at this time.
is inhabited by intelligent human beings like us who will come
and go between their planet and our planet. They created homo
sapiens. We look like them. I call them
There are a few problems with these
ideas that I would like to address.
The 12th Planet produces a feeling
not unlike that apparently felt by the old lady on the television
commercial who orders a hamburger from a fast food joint only to be
forced to ask the question: "Where's the beef?"
And the fast food
analogy can be carried a bit further in saying that the Earth
Chronicles are immediately gratifying, having been pumped full of
fat and chemicals, thrills and chills, but leave us mentally
malnourished = lots of theory, no substance and no validation.
The entire body of work is so full of glaring inconsistencies that
it is sometimes difficult to decide where to start in sorting it all
out. Sitchin claims to have documentary evidence that a tenth planet
exists as part of our solar system and that a race of superior
beings, originating on this planet, once inhabited our world,
genetically engineering mankind for purposes of slavery.
However, a few words ought to be said
about the kind of evidence that Sitchin and many of his followers
like to use: pictographic. Mythological concepts which involve the
heavens, deification of the Sun, Moon, or Venus cannot be called
astronomy if one is not also willing to count as hydrodynamics the
existence of a belief in a storm deity or the personification of a
river. Also the denomination of conspicuous stars or constellations
does not constitute an astronomical science.
Yet that has not stopped Dr. Sitchin from astronomical
interpretations of great specificity based upon little more than
epigraphic evidence. Sitchin and those who follow his lead see great
astronomical truths in every object d'art of ancient times, never
supposing for an instant that there could be far more prosaic
explanations for many of these things.
For example, the famous cylinder seal
that set Sitchin on fire: a stylized star surrounded by 11 bodies on
a cylinder seal.
"The miniature art of the seal
cutter is of peculiar social as well as aesthetic interest. The
idea of making personal identity marks by impressing intaglios
on clay sealings began, as we have seen, in Protoliterate times
and was later extended to tablets. Seals were thus from the
first associated with commerce and quite soon, if not from the
first, with private ownership.
This association with trade is
proclaimed not only by their use in Mesopotamia itself but by
the appearance of specimens in Egypt, the Indus and then, in the
second millennium, in Mycenaean Greece and the Aegean. Possibly
Mesopotamian merchants sometimes entrusted them to their agents
in these distant lands.
A personal seal remained an essential
possession down to the later days of Babylon: Herodotus said of
the Babylonians of his day, 'everyone owns a seal'."
Basing a cosmological theory on a
cylinder seal is kind of like describing planet earth by
Prudential's Rock of Gibraltar logo. Imagine some future
archaeologist defining our beliefs by examining the RCA dog and
gramophone or the flying windows of Bill Gates.
It is certainly true, in our opinion, that the evidence for
extraterrestrial visitation and even intervention is all but
overwhelming but that is no reason to trade off one god concept
which must be accepted on faith for another. From time immemorial
men have recorded sightings of mysterious objects in the skies and
they have been impressed enough by them to hand them down through
traditions, artifacts and written documentation.
Many legends are
based on fact; but it is hard enough and often impossible to decide
whether the facts are based on what seems most reasonable or whether
they are lying buried in time, under a mass of buildings,
mythological elements or psychological hyperbole.
In his prologue to The Twelfth Planet, Sitchin plainly states his
"In the ensuing years, as I have
learned the languages and history and archaeology of the ancient
Near East, the Nephilim became an obsession."
An obsession it surely is. An obsession
is defined clinically as:
"...an uncontrollable desire to
dwell on an idea or an emotion, or to perform a specific act. It
is not uncommon among normal persons, but if not banished may
become all compelling, developing into a compulsion neurosis."
And, a compulsion neurosis is "an obsession or psycho-neurosis
urging one to perform an absurd act or to say something silly."
In the case of
the Earth Chronicles,
this is too sadly true.
On the first page of The Twelfth Planet Sitchin sets up his
obsession by saying:
"Archaeological finds and the
deciphering of Sumerian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Hittite,
Canaanite and other ancient texts and epic tales increasingly
confirmed the accuracy of the biblical references to the
kingdoms, cities, rulers, places, temples, trade routes,
artifacts, tools and customs of antiquity. Is it not now time,
therefore, to accept the word of these same ancient records
the Nephilim as visitors to Earth from the heavens?"
Well, I have no objection to accepting
the Nephilim as visitors to Earth from the heavens.
But there is
some question as to how far one can go in accepting the Bible or
other ancient documents in a literal or absolute sense when
developing complex, comprehensive theories. Aside from this is the
fact that many other sources have given quite different explanations
for the issues Sitchin addresses. And, often these other
explanations fit the facts as we know them far better. Not only
that, but it is NOT true that the Bible has been "confirmed" as an
accurate historical source.
Quite the contrary, in fact.
Sitchin's Mesopotamian Rocket
Ships: How to Ignore Ancient Mesopotamian Dictionaries - by
S. Heiser, author of The Façade, Ph.D. candidate, Hebrew and Ancient
Semitic Languages, University of Wisconsin-Madison]
Nevertheless, there is much circumstantial evidence to support the
idea of an alien race visiting earth; of ancient, advanced
civilizations and perhaps even genetic engineering of Homo Sapiens.
In fact, at the end of the day when all the material is analyzed,
such ideas are the only ones that seem to stand up to scrutiny.
Professor John A. Mason of Pennsylvania University cites the
oldest Peruvian traditions and refers to the "habitable qualities of
the stars" as mentioned by the texts centered on the "descent of
gods from the constellation of the Pleiades". The legend is that the
first Peruvians were born from a bronze, gold and silver egg which
fell from the sky.
Some scholars think that the Bolivian city of
Tiahuanaco was built around 16,000
years ago on the ruins of something built by the "fair-haired
giants" 200-250,000 years ago, as mentioned in native legend.
"Once men could fly" we encounter
again and again in the legends.
"Everything was sufficiently light and big stones were
(Mysteries of Ancient South
America, Harold T. Wilins)
The Haida Indians of the queen Charlotte
Islands retain the tradition of "Great sages descended from the
stars on discs of fire", and
the Navajos tell of "creatures who came
from the sky and stayed a long time on Earth but finally returned to
their world". Most of the legends around the globe make frequent
allusions to the descent of a divinity from the Stars, not from a
tenth planet within our solar system.
The evidence suggesting strongly that celestial visitors came to
earth and probably played a large role in our early development -
even including genetic engineering - is extensive. But, that they came
from a 12th planet in our own solar system which ferries them along
for a short shuttle every 3,600 years is preposterous. This concept
is excruciatingly outdated based on reports of modern day UFO
activity and what we know about the alleged capabilities of same and
their "alien" occupants.
Sitchin writes on page 89 of his second volume,
The Stairway to
"When Marduk invaded our solar
system, it brought with it the seed of life. In the collision
with Tiamat, some of the seed of life was transferred to its
surviving part - Planet Earth. As life evolved on Earth, it
emulated evolution on Marduk. And so it was that when on Earth
the human species just began to stir, on Marduk intelligent
beings had already achieved high levels of civilization and
If Marduk was close enough to a large
body for it, or one of its satellites, to collide with said body,
and if Marduk itself was as enormous as claimed by Sitchin, then the
said proximity would have caused a slowing to near stasis of both
bodies and consequent disruption of the entire surfaces of both
bodies, reducing both to rubble and equality in terms of
evolutionary life forms.
In other words, a couple of rocks
inhabited by slime. And then, if Marduk were to continue on its way,
supposedly evolving life as it went, one of the fundamentals of
Sitchin's very own theory, the 3,600 earth year orbit equaling one
of our years here on Earth, negates the idea of a civilization more
advanced than our own.
Why? Well, it is actually rather simple.
If one of Marduk/Nibiru's
years is equal to 3,600 of earth's, and the inhabitants age far more
slowly than we do, then they would naturally evolve equally slowly.
In fact, rather than being more advanced than we are, they would
still be amoebas! The same problems of evolutionary theory on earth
hold true for Marduk/Nibiru. Life begins with protein chains each
made up of amino acids. There are 20 possibilities for each "link"
in the chain.
Even if a new combination were tried
every millionth of a second, it would take longer than the life time
of the earth to form a chain associated with life -- odds against it
are a 1 followed by 95 zeros. Thus, we are left to conclude that,
obviously life on earth got a boost from somewhere, but it could not
have been from another planet in our solar system that started out
with the same potentials, but was slowed by its incredibly long life
Another problem with this theory lies in certain observations of
quantum physics which seem to hold true for larger electrically
charged bodies: a body of the solar system large enough (but not
beyond a certain ratio) to break apart the earth probably could not
do so because when two electrically charged particles approach each
other they come under the influence of their mutual electromagnetic
fields and the forces operating between them cause disturbance which
is transmitted in the form of photons or electrical discharges. The
exchange then causes the two particles to Fly Apart. No impact can
Sitchin argues that the mythical tales were actual stories of the
doings of the Nephilim. And, while he is insisting we must take them
literally, we must trust him to tell us which parts to take
literally! Obviously the part of Enki and the World Order where it
says "He lifts the penis, ejaculates, fills the Tigris with
sparkling waters," is subject to interpretation!
I would like to give Sitchin credit for many of the interesting
deductions he has made, but if we want to know the truth, I think we
have to look for the common threads in numerous sources. Sitchin
leaves too many holes unfilled, too many contradictions to both
material science and long established mystical traditions, and too
many questions unanswered. I nearly laughed myself into hysterics
when I read his theory that the Pyramid was built as an artificial
mountain to show the ancient astronauts the way to go home.
see one of our "primitive" astronauts peering through the window of
the space shuttle and saying, "better put on the brakes I see Disney
The fact is, the idea that something may be whacking through our
solar system at periodic intervals is a concept of such importance
that it simply cannot be overstated.
But, getting back to our problem of the putative Planet Nibiru.
The relative importance of an idea and the implications of the
conclusions that can be drawn from that idea, ought to determine the
level of attention given to the idea. The fact is, the idea that
something may be whacking through our solar system at periodic
intervals is a concept of such importance that it simply cannot be
Zecharia Sitchin analyzed the myths of the Sumerians, concluding
that they referred to a massive unseen planet, and further, that all
of the stories point to a cyclical return at intervals of 3600
years. I believe that Dr. Sitchin is onto something with this
matter. But, perhaps not exactly what he thinks.
...there is a strong likelihood that
some kind of large body exists in solar space beyond Pluto and
exerts strong gravitational attraction on the outermost planets.
The Russians theorized in the 60s that
there may be not one, but three planetary bodies existing in our
solar system beyond Pluto (see below table).
Aberrations in the orbital motion of
Neptune and Uranus have convinced many of our own scientists that
there is a strong likelihood that some kind of large body exists in
solar space beyond Pluto and exerts strong gravitational attraction
on the outermost planets.
So we conclude along with Sitchin that, if
a definite cycle exists, one of the most logical explanations for it
is that it is caused by a planetary-like body making regular,
Names of all
their distances from the sun, the chemical
composition, and the diameter
Distance from Sun
36 million miles from
3000 mi dia.
67 million miles from
7,500 mi. dia.
93 million miles from
7,900 mi. dia.
141,500,000 miles from
4,200 mi. dia.
483,400,000 miles from
88,700 mi. dia.
886,700,000 miles from
74,500 mi. dia.
1,782,700,000 miles from
31,566 mi. dia.
2,794,300,000 miles from
30,199 mi. dia.
3,666,100,000 miles from
1,864 mi. dia.
7,000 mi. dia.
18,000 mi. dia.
46,000 mi. dia.
from 'The Cassiopaeans Logs' -
September 30, 1994
But NOT into the inner solar system.
"If it does exist, and it does
reappear cyclically, why doesn't science know about it?" The
skeptical reader will ask.
This issue of the cycle of this
purported "return" is of the utmost importance to our eschatological
theme. If we take seriously any of the prophecies of the end-times
in any terms whatsoever, we find ourselves facing the idea that the
world is either due shortly for great geologic and meteorological
events, or it is not. If we consider the remote possibility that
this is going to happen, and if we are interested in human destiny,
it behooves us to investigate whether or not there is a correlation
between cyclical geologic changes in the earth's past and the
future, and what that cycle might be.
What is more, there is also compelling
hard scientific evidence that our planet has relatively recently
experienced cataclysmic geological changes. It has only been in
recent years that some of the more convincing evidence of this kind,
such as ice core samples and tree ring analysis, has been revealed.
If we, for one second, think that there is a one-percent possibility
that such events are cyclic, and that we may be approaching such an
event, we ought to be putting the whole force of all our science and
all the great minds of our civilization into researching the matter.
But that does not seem to be the case.
the leaders of our nations so stupid that they cannot think that far
ahead? Or are they so greedy and power hungry that they don't care?
Do they intend to "get while the getting's good," and then when the
final curtain comes, they will think that they were the stars of the
show? This poses a peculiar problem. How do we assess who really
Over and over again, as we have pushed deeper and deeper into our
research, we find that investigating these matters is problematic
for a lot of reasons. On the surface, what we see is that academic
and professional geologists, glaciologists, geophysicists,
paleontologists, oceanographers, astronomers, astrophysicists,
physicists, mathematicians, archaeologists, and so on, do not take
kindly to intrusions into their private little worlds.
their gods of convention, whom they worship, and god forbid that
anyone should criticize the acceptable protocols of the conventional
interpretation. They are warm and safe and their career is protected
by their covenant with the scientific Thought Police who are, in
turn, high priests to the Matrix Control System.
And this is where we discover the problem. The Matrix Control
System, via the offices of its high priests of science and social
control, ensures that glaciologists do not cross over into
astrophysics and that geologists do not cross over into archaeology.
In this way, there is no such thing as Comparative Science, and this
is most especially true in the United States where the lines between
disciplines are most strongly demarcated, patrolled, and enforced by
the Scientific Thought Police.
These conditions bring our problem into sharp focus. As we have
attempted to get to the very bottom of many of the claims of the
experts in the various fields, we have discovered that there is much
data that is completely suppressed by this system. There is also a
great deal of data that falls under the control of government
agencies, and access to it is severely limited. I discovered that
there is, indeed, an effort on the part of various government
agencies to investigate these cyclical returns and cometary impact
matters, but that the results are generally unavailable to the
They consist of technical papers, stored
on microfiche, buried in research and special collections sections
of university libraries. Some of it makes its way into print, but
the volumes are so costly that the researcher in these fields must
be well-financed to be able to afford them. Those things that make
it to print in technical journals, are couched in such amazingly
obtuse and opaque terminology that one must be as sharp as a
Damascus sword to cut through the nonsense. And it is almost a given
that only a trained scientist who knows the "hidden jargon" will be
able to decipher the code.
In this sense, we are fortunate. Ark has this training, and he is a
world-class mathematician. When he finds numbers and theories and
results, he can wade through the nonsense, reproduce the
calculations, and make some headway in discovering just exactly what
it is that is being hidden.
I must also tell the reader that, for weeks on end as we have
ordered and read technical papers, books, files of data, reports and
so forth, the enormity of the problem of suppression of information
has become overwhelmingly evident.
Every night, after a long day of
analysis, calculations, plugging numbers into formulas and compiling
results, we would prepare for bed, both of us shaking our heads and
muttering over and over again:
"lies, lies, lies; nothing but lies."
And so it is. Not only are the separate scientific disciplines most
often unaware of developments in other fields which may have
important data that would help their own studies, they are also
conditioned - programmed - to consider it scientific blasphemy to
compare their own conclusion with the data from other fields. And
somebody is controlling this system of suppression.
The terrestrial axis is currently inclined at 23.5 degrees. The
early Greek philosophers viewed this tilt as an "irregular
condition," and not something that had been fixed since the
In the beginning the stars moved in
the sky as in a revolving dome, so that the celestial pole which
is always visible was vertically overhead; but subsequently the
pole took its inclined position.
Hesiod discussed the cyclical conception
of time in his Works and Days, saying that the human race had five
ages: Gold, Silver, Bronze, Heroic, and Iron. The Heroic age is seen
by many scholars as an addition to an earlier scheme meant to
accommodate Greek history. During the first of these ages, mankind
lived under the rule of Kronos, or Saturn, and were on friendly
terms with the gods, and were free from hard work, pain, and old
Plato wrote about a periodic reversal of
the rotation of "the world," his intent probably being the entire
"cosmic machine," rather than just the planet, being the cause of
the end of one age and the beginning of another. He tells us that
all the stories of the changes in the rising and setting of the sun
and planets originate from the same event in cosmic history: the
usurpation of the rule of Chronos by Zeus.
When God was shepherd there were no political constitutions and no
taking of wives and begetting of children. For all men rose up anew
into life out of the earth, having no memory of the former things.
Instead they had fruits without stint from trees and bushes; these
needed no cultivation but sprang up of themselves out of the ground
without man's toil. For the most part they disported themselves in
the open needing neither clothing nor couch, for the seasons were
blended evenly so as to work them no hurt, and the grass which
sprang up out of the earth in abundance made a soft bed for them.
But this age came to a close and the gods of that age gave up their
benevolent governance, turning the rule of the world over to
something "other." Plato describes the close of the era in terms of
The gods of the provinces, who had
ruled under the greatest god, knew at once what was happening
and relinquished the oversight of their regions. A shudder
passed through the world at the reversing of its rotation,
checked as it was between the old control and the new impulse
which had turned end into beginning for it and beginning into
This shock set up a great quaking which caused - in this
crisis of the world just as in the former one - destruction of
living creatures of all kinds. Then, after the interval needed
for its recovery, it gained relief at last from its clamors and
confusion, and attaining quiet after great upheaval it returned
to its ordered course and continued in it, having control and
government of itself and of all within it.
Herodotus seems to be quoting from the
same source that Plato utilized when he reports:
Thus in the period of eleven
thousand three hundred and forty years they said that there had
arisen no god in human form; nor even before that time or
afterwards among the remaining kings who arose in Egypt, did
they report that anything of that kind had come to pass.
time they said that the sun had moved four times from his
accustomed place of rising, and where he now sets he had thence
twice had his rising, and in the place from whence he now rises
he had twice had his setting; and in the meantime nothing in
Egypt had been changed from its usual state, neither that which
comes from the earth nor that which comes to them from the river
nor that which concerns diseases or deaths.
Both Herodotus and Plato are explicit in
saying that the phenomenon is dual natured, that something happens
"out there" in the Solar system and the results on the earth are
cataclysmic. Herodotus says that it happened four times in an 11,500
year period, and Plato says that it is an ever-recurring phenomenon.
Modern interpreters of these passages generally divide into two
groups: the catastrophists and the uniformitarians.
catastrophists suggest that the description is that of a literal 180
degree flip of the earth. The Uniformitarians like to talk in terms
of "world ages" according to the "Precession of the Zodiac."
In his Principia Mathematica, Isaac Newton demonstrated that the
precession of the equinoxes is the result of the earth's oblate spheroidal shape which causes it to spin in something less than a
perfectly aligned motion. In short, it inscribes a very gradual
circle in relation to the celestial axis and, according to Newton,
the period in which this entire circle is completed is 26 thousand
years. This means that not only does the sun rise in a slightly
different location, but the terrestrial axis points to a different
area in the heavens as time goes by.
As it happens, the general area of the heavens pointed to by the
terrestrial pole, does not have an abundance of visible stars to
consistently have a pole star. So it is only occasionally that it
really has one, and even then, the pole star is not quite "on the
Twelve thousand years ago, the time at which many occultists point
out that one of the stars in Draco, Thuban, was the pole star, it
was actually less of a pole star than the current one if we take
into account the decreasing angle of the axis of the earth. That is
assuming, of course, that present observations can be extrapolated
Most of the occult or psychic speculations link the Pole Shift with
Noah's Flood and the destruction of Atlantis, the fabled ancient
high civilization. But, the uniformitarian view is also well
represented in the occult literature. Sampson Arnold Mackey, a
shoemaker in Norwich, England, formulated a grand theory of the ages
of the world that is pretty much based on De Louville's gradual
diminution of the angle of the terrestrial axis to the plane of the
ecliptic, but also incorporating ideas based on the precession of
the equinoxes. And here is where we find the first fully expounded
idea that the precession itself is important as a clock that strikes
the hours of world ages.
Mackey assumed the precessional cycle to be 25 thousand years. He
also accepted the gradual diminution of the axial orientation at one
degree every 6 thousand years. He assumed (from where, we don't
know), that each completion of the precessional cycle diminished the
angle of the earth axis by four degrees. Therefore, it will take
four more precessional cycles to get to the "Golden Age," at which
time the terrestrial axis is aligned with the celestial axis. Four
more precessional cycles equals 150 thousand years from now.
Helena Blavatsky adopted some of Mackey's ideas during her short
term of membership in a "secret society" called the Hermetic
Brotherhood of Luxor (HB of L), which taught Mackey's doctrine
in an essay called "The Hermetic Key" composed by
Burgoyne, secretary of that order. However, the HB of L made some
"adjustments" to Mackey's ideas so they would better fit some other
scheme of their own. They altered the degrees of change per cycle
from 4 to 3'36" so that a complete cycle takes one hundred turns.
They also changed the precessional period from 25 thousand years, to
25,920 years, coming closer to Newton's original figure.
Mackey believed that he had discovered in astrology, the key to
universal mythology. His entire scheme was based on certain
mythological interpretations, and the HB of L claimed Mackey as a
member, but of course, only after he was dead. This seems to be a
common practice of many secret societies that seek to align
themselves with certain ideas or people for one reason or another.
Nevertheless, the adoption of this precession idea by the HB of L,
later taken up by the occultists Papus, Barlet, Guenon, Reuss,
Kellner and Steiner, ensured that it would become a foundational
philosophy among groups such as the Ordo Templi Orientalis, the
Theosophical Society, the Golden Dawn, and so on. Most of their
ideas are founded on this uniformitarian, cosmic clock of precession
and slow, spiraling movement of the earth's pole in a grand,
shifting circle that reverses the polar directions every two million
years or so.
There is another interesting motion of the earth's axis called the
Chandler Wobble. The Chandler wobble, discovered by astronomer S. C.
Chandler in 1891, is a variation in the earth's axis of rotation
amounting to 0.7 seconds of arc over a period of 435 days, or about
14 months. This means that the earth's poles wander a bit as the
planet spins, describing an irregular circle ranging from 10 to 50
feet in diameter. There's also nutation, an aggregation of
sub-wobbles, the most significant of which has a period of 18.6
years and results from variations in the distance of the moon.
Scientists have been particularly intrigued by the Chandler wobble,
since its cause has remained a mystery even though it has been under
observation for over a century. Its period is only around 433 days,
or just 1.2 years, meaning that it takes that amount of time to
complete one wobble. The amplitude of the wobble amounts to about 20
feet at the North Pole. It has been calculated that the Chandler
wobble would be damped down, or reduced to zero, in just 68 years,
unless some force were constantly acting to reinvigorate it.
what is that force, or excitation mechanism?
Over the years, various
hypotheses have been put forward, such as atmospheric phenomena,
continental water storage (changes in snow cover, river runoff, lake
levels, or reservoir capacities), interaction at the boundary of
Earth's core and its surrounding mantle, and earthquakes.
Researcher Michael Mandeville has charted and analyzed the Chandler
Wobble and suggests that it is progressively shifting the location
of the poles at an accelerating rate. His conclusion is that
something is "driving" this change - possibly some interaction
between the earth and the Sun and/or Moon. Whatever is driving it,
it seems that the result is a heating up of the interior of the
earth with consequent El Niño, and accelerating earthquake activity.
The fact that the Earth's magnetic poles have changed many times in
"history" is now a well accepted scientific fact. But this actually
says nothing at all about the planet itself "flipping." It just
signifies a reversal of the magnetic field. As we now know, the Sun
reverses its magnetic field regularly and cyclically with no
apparent cataclysmic effects. So, a simple reversal of the magnetic
field cannot be used in support of a physical and literal "Pole
The Pole Shift idea was described as the "ultimate disaster" by
White in his book appropriately entitled Pole Shift. White listed
numerous psychic prophecies that are clearly describing a Pole Shift
and attempted to relate them to scientific ideas. One source claims
that the Hawaiian Islands will rise and become peaks of a great
mountain chain on a new continent that will rise in the Pacific.
Another source predicts that the Hawaiian Islands will sink beneath
the sea. Such contradictions among psychics are often handily
explained with the "branching universe" theory with a twist: both
are true, they just refer to different periods of future history.
As it turned out, most of the psychic predictions analyzed by
White concerned the period right around the year 2,000. Well, it has
come and gone, the pole didn't flip, and we are still here.
Naturally, many of the psychics and channels of the space brothers
say that we ought to thank their "guides" or "guardians" for that
fact since they all pulled together to keep us from falling into the
pit. Nice try, but, as the Cassiopaeans have said: "Tales are easy
to sew/sow, when the past is yours only to know." And how true that
In the end, the chief problem of all the theories is that of the
What is driving the machine?
What is changing
in our solar system that we are not being told about?
Why are the
rumor mongers and the theorists of such things as "Planet Nibiru" or
"galactic alignment" or "precessional ages" allowed to promulgate
their nonsense, while the real data is being so carefully hidden?
In order to form any ideas about a "trigger," it is important to try
to sort out the data that we can get and decide if a Pole Shift is a
gradual, uniformitarian event, or if it is sudden and cataclysmic.
There are endless descriptions of possible scenarios and none of
them were ringing any bells until I discovered the ideas of
Indeed, John White devotes about 20 or so pages to Velikovsky's ideas, and in general, he merely used them to support
the idea of past Pole Shifts, pointing out that Velikovsky made no
predictions about future events of this type. We might also note
that Velikovsky must have hit a real nerve to have been so viciously
vilified. The Scientific Thought Police went into overdrive to
Velikovsky was condemned because he denied that the orbits in the
solar system were stable.
When reading Velikovsky's blow-by-blow interpretation of the events
of the Exodus as recorded in the Bible, the result of the close
approach of a cometary Venus, I realized that these events mirrored,
almost word for word, the events described in the book of
Revelation. What is more interesting is that the book of Revelation
was written long before the current craze of End Time Prophecies. It
is sort of the Mother of all End Time Prophecies. (And I will soon
be writing more about this specifically, so stay tuned!)
As it happens, there are many individuals who have noted the
evidence in ancient myths and legends. We are not the first. Sitchin
is not the first. Theories of the earth encountering a comet did not
originate with Velikovsky either.
In 1882, Ignatius Donnelly, a Minnesota congressman and scholar of
all-things-Atlantean, wrote a book entitled
Ragnarok, wherein he
proposed that a giant comet had passed close to the earth in past
ages. The intense heat from the comet had set off huge fires that
raged across the face of the globe. He suggested that the comet had
dumped vast amounts of dust on the earth, triggered earthquakes,
leveled mountains, and initiated the ice age.
He even explained some
of the miracles of the Bible in terms of his comet, proposing that
the standing-still of the sun at the command of Joshua, was possibly
a tale commemorating this event. Donnelly's readers were thrilled by
his descriptions of the "glaring and burning monster" in the sky,
scorching the planet with unearthly heat and shaking the land with
"thunders beyond all thunders."
Possibly inspired by Donnelly, Camille Flammarion wrote The End of
the World in 1893 in which he recounted a fictional collision
between the earth and a comet fifty times its size. Flammarion's
lurid prose ensured that his book was an immediate sensation!
For thousands of years, comets have been associated with disaster
and misfortune. They are harbingers of plagues, earthquakes, floods,
natural disasters and wars. In fact, the passing of a comet followed
by war has been so frequent as to earn for comets the soubriquet
"The Swords of Heaven."
Tradition has assigned responsibility to
comets for death and destructions, disease and decay, defeat and
dissolution, the deaths of kings, and the fall of empires. It could
be said that no celestial phenomenon is so widely and generally
Velikovsky believed that this fear had a foundation in fact:
it was a sort of global subconscious memory of actual encounters
between the earth and other cosmic bodies that were so devastating
that the fearful reality of the event was suppressed into the
collective subconscious, and only a "comet phobia" remained in
In 1857, an anonymous German astrologer predicted that a comet would
strike the earth on June 13 of that year. The impending catastrophe
became the talk of all of Europe. The French astronomer, Jacques Babinet tried to reassure people by stating that a collision between
the earth and a comet would do no harm. He compared the impact to "a
railway train coming into contact with a fly." His words,
apparently, had little effect.
The Paris correspondent for the American
journal, Harper's Weekly, wrote:
Women have miscarried; crops have
been neglected; wills have been made; comet-proof suits of
clothing have been invented; a cometary life insurance company
(premiums payable in advance) has been created… all because an
almanac maker… thought proper to insert, under the week
commencing June 13, 'About this time, expect a comet.'
Naturally, by the time of dawn on July
14, it was apparent that there wasn't going to be a comet. The point
is: an astrologer's "prophecy" had terrified millions in the total
absence of any evidence that there was a comet anywhere near the
planet. And this type of scenario has occurred more than once, even
down to our own day and time when
the Heaven's Gate cult members
committed mass suicide in response to rumors and prognostications
comet Hale Bopp.
...more recent scientific evidence
points to the date actually being 1628 BC. There is also
evidence for a disruption circa 5200 BC, 8,800 BC, 12,400 BC,
16,000 BC, 19,600 BC, and by logical extension every 3,600 years
previously for an indefinite and unknown period of time.
Immanuel Velikovsky demonstrated rather
convincingly that there was massive evidence of both a literary and
scientific nature that great catastrophic earth changes had occurred
during the second millennium BC due to cometary showers and the
close passage of Venus.
He settled on a date of 1450 BC, but more
recent scientific evidence points to the date actually being 1628
BC. There is also evidence for a disruption circa 5200 BC, 8,800 BC,
12,400 BC, 16,000 BC, 19,600 BC, and by logical extension every
3,600 years previously for an indefinite and unknown period of time.
What is more, if the last "return" was in 1628 BC, we are not just
due, we are overdue for the next one.
The theories about Nibiru do not take into account many of the
literary reports from the ancients regarding these great
bombardments of comets. Velikovsky tried to account for this by
suggesting that a cometary Venus was hauling around a tail of rocks.
It seems that Velikovsky and his supporters, and Sitchin and his
supporters, although recognizing serious worldwide catastrophes,
have failed to recognize the true nature of such events.
Velikovsky proposed that Venus out of
orbit was a more or less one-time event rather than a symptom of a
long term cycle. Sitchin came closer with his understanding of the
cycle, but he failed to consider all the variables in his solution.
What is more, once he settled on his idea as the one and only
solution, his efforts to make the mythical elements fit the
hypothesis became almost as absurd as the efforts of mainstream
science to avoid them!
The confirmed linchpin for the fall of the late Bronze Age cultures,
the Middle Eastern Civilizations, and other recorded disasters that
are found to be "around that time," seems to be the period from 1644
BC to 1628 BC. The ice cores show the disturbances starting in 1644
(registering in 1645) and the tree rings show a big spike in 1628,
though the entire period was disturbed.
Yoshiyuki Fujii and Okitsugu Watanabe's "Microparticle Concentration
And Electrical Conductivity of A 700 m Ice Core from Mizuho Station
Antarctic" published in Annals of Glaciology (1-, 1988) pp. 38-42,
"large scale environmental changed possibly
occurred in the Southern Hemisphere in the middle of the Holocene.
(Within the last 10,000 years). Their depth profiles of microparticle concentration, electrical conductivity and Oxygen 18
at circa 1600 BC indicates a spike in readings for all of these
elements. The evidence shows that this disturbance covered this
designated period, but with a "huge spike" at c. 1600 BC".
Similar evidence from the same source article exists at 5,200 BC.
This period shows a less severe but similar period. The oxygen 18
profile is close to normal, but there is a visible volcanic dirt
band. The dating of this segment is less close because it is clear
that nobody is really looking for this cycle, but it appears to
correspond to the ash band from the Byrd station core.
It is conjectured that the cycle goes unnoticed because of long term
after-effects, such as cooling climate, as well as the fact that each
cycle has greater or lesser effects on the earth depending on its
relative position in the solar system at the time.
What is clear is that whatever comes at 3600 year intervals as shown
by the ice cores, is capable of setting off prolonged periods of
earth changes that are above the levels of ordinary uniformitarian
geologic and climatalogical changes.
But the evidence suggests that
it is a shower of asteroids or comets that are NOT seen until it is
In an article in Nature, November 1980, Hammer, Clausen and
Dansgaard date a disturbance from the Camp Century core to 5470 BC
+/- 120 years. This compares to the proposed Hekla eruption which
was radiocarbon dated to 5450 BC +/- 190 years. There is an
appreciably high acidity signal at these sections of the core which
indicates a high level of volcanic activity - again, right at the
3600 year cycle mark.
Looking further: Michel R. Legrand and Robert J. Delmas of
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environment published
an article "Soluble Impurities in Four Antarctic Ice Cores Over the
Last 30,000 Years" in Annals of Glaciology (10, 1988, pp 116-120).
They graphed the Oxygen 18 variations and the ionic components Na =
NH (sub4) and Ca (sup 2) and H and Cl and NO (sub 3) and SO (sub 4).
The time scale for each ionic component level as well as the O (sup
18) levels stretches back 30,000 years. The graph shows correlations
to spikes at 5,200 BC, 8,800 BC, 12,400 BC, c. 16,000 BC, c. 19,600
BC. All of these were times of great geologic stress.
When looking at the data and taking into account the acknowledged
dating inaccuracies (some of the ranges of dates can go 100 years in
either direction of the spike, even though the spiking is regular
and rhythmic) for the more recent dates, and 3 to 600 years variance
for the older dates - especially when one considers that these are
broad analyses and nobody was really looking for anything specific -
they just said "wow! look at that wavy line!" we find that the
southern ice cores do not register the same as the northern ones.
The 1628 BC event that really slammed the tree rings shows almost no
registration in the Antarctic cores in terms of volcanic activity.
But the northern cores show the activity beginning 1644 BC.
The evidence for the 5200 BC event is strong in the Dome C core. The
8,800 BC event is well marked - in fact, seems to be the strongest
of them all... The Flood of Noah, no doubt! The oxygen 18 isotope
variation is noticeable, the rise in sea-salt, elevated levels of C
1 and C1/Na. There is an extreme spike in SO (sub 4) and H readings
suggesting widespread volcanic activity - great earth changes were
happening at that time, and they registered in the climate, the
oceans, and were preserved in ice.
The 12,400 BC event is extremely pronounced in the cores. The graphs
show a quick, vast change including the end of the Wisconsin Ice
Evidence of Nuclear Activity in Paleoindian
is a great Oxygen 18 isotope variation. Peaks of Na and very
pronounced spikes in Ca, SO (sub 4) and H.
To ascribe all of these things to a "uniformitarian" idea that it
just got cold and then got warm and got cold and warm... with such
an evident cycle is sort of absurd. To ascribe it to a "galactic
core explosion" is equally absurd. To ascribe it to "Galactic
Alignment" is not worth consideration.
I think that, based on the observations of the ancients that what we
are looking for is a recurring shower of comets that cycles through
the solar system regularly, on a 3,600 year orbit.
I think that, based on the observations of the ancients that what we
are looking for is a recurring shower of comets that cycles through
the solar system regularly, on a 3,600 year orbit.
What is more, it
seems that this body of comets, clustered together resembles a Fiery
serpent with a mouthful of devouring teeth in the blackness of
space. For this reason, it was given the name spdt, spdw, and
spd-ibhw (sharp toothed), in
the Pyramid Texts. It undoubtedly is a
Of course, an important question is: what is the "initiator" of
these showers, and did they begin in some interaction with an
According to scientific studies about the possibilities of
having a companion, periodic comets were "bumped" into the solar
system by a dark star, a "little brother" or "little sister" of our
own Sun, which has a long, elliptical orbit measured, most likely,
in millions of years.
If it is a companion star, present day science pretty clearly
demonstrates that it must have a very long period, otherwise, we
would notice it quite plainly in orbital perturbations of a certain
type. In actual fact, the computer model that best fits the various
dynamics is that of a 27 million year orbit. And this, of course,
leads us to a considerable difficulty: the period of return of the
Dark Star, as opposed to the period of disasters. Obviously, a body
with a 27 million year orbit isn't likely to be remembered. However,
an ancient advanced science may have certainly figured it out and it
was remembered and passed down in fantastic myths and legends.
J.G. Hills of Los Alamos National Laboratory writes:
Two groups have recently suggested
that the Sun may have a low-mass stellar or black dwarf
companion, nemesis, with an orbital period of 26 million years )
Davis, Hut, and Muller, 1984) Whitmire and Jackson, 1984). They
note that the perihelion passage of
Nemesis through the inner
comet cloud postulated by Hills (1981) would cause an intense
comet shower to enter the inner planetary system.
hit the Earth, causing severe environmental stress. They propose
that these induced comet showers are responsible for the
periodic extinctions suggested by the data of Raup and Sepkoski
The work by these experts suggests that
the observations of other binary systems demonstrate the model for
the projected separation they have given. Such paired stars are
"physically connected systems," and that these brown dwarfs are
"burning," though non-nuclear.
The minimum mass needed to perturb the inner Oort cloud to produce
such showers is, according to Hills, 0.01 percent of the Mass of the
In the current paper, I use computer
simulations to investigate the potential damage caused by the
passage of a Nemesis-like object through the planetary system. I
use these computer results and the apparent lack of damage to
the planetary orbits to place limits on the number and masses of
any other black dwarfs (or large planets) within the Oort cloud.
We conclude from the lack of damage to the planetary orbits that
it is extremely unlikely that any object more massive than 0.02
percent of the Mass of the Sun dwells in an orbit with a
semimajor axis in the range 10,000 to 40,000 AU. 
What Hills is clearly saying is this:
it is out there, it never enters the Inner Solar system.
Thus, we understand that it is not this Twin sun that makes its
"appearance" at each period of catastrophe. Nevertheless, the
analyses of the periodic comets suggests that it does, at very long
periods, again and again, crash through the Oort cloud like a
bowling ball through rows of pins, sending a new collection of them
spinning into a periodical orbit, and because of the laws of
celestial mechanics, they establish an orbit of 3,600 years. This
idea has some support from SCIENTIFIC STUDIES, which the theory of
the Planet Nibiru as a visitor to the inner solar system does NOT.
Discovering the details requires research. And research requires a
hypothesis. And a hypothesis requires admitting possibilities and
making observations that are not predicated on assumptions that have
proven again and again to be inadequate to explain the order of the
universe. At present, there are very few "experts" who are even
looking into the matter of our sun having a companion. You can count
them on the fingers of one hand. There are more "experts" on
Dwarfs, but most of them seem to be limited by the same conventions
that restrict science in general.
A group of summer students making a long-shot astronomical gamble
with the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Very Large Array (VLA)
have found the first radio emission ever detected from a brown
dwarf, an enigmatic object that is neither a star nor a planet, but
something in between.
Their surprising discovery is forcing experts
to re-think their theories about how brown dwarfs work.
"Many astronomers are surprised at
this discovery, because they didn't expect such strong radio
emission from this object," said Shri Kulkarni, a Caltech
professor who was on the team that first discovered a brown
dwarf in 1995, and advisor to one of the students.
"What is so cool is that this is
research that probably nobody else would have tried to do
because of its low chance of success. That made it ideal for
summer students -- we had almost nothing to lose," said Kate
Becker, a student at Oberlin College in Ohio.
"The radio emission these students discovered coming from this
brown dwarf is 10,000 times stronger than anyone expected," said
Dale Frail, an astronomer at the National Radio Astronomy
Observatory (NRAO) in Socorro, NM. "This student project is
going to open up a whole new area of research for the VLA,"
Brown dwarfs are too big to be planets
but too small to be true stars, as they have too little mass to
trigger hydrogen fusion reactions at their cores, the source of the
energy output in larger stars. With roughly 15 to 80 times the mass
of Jupiter, the largest planet in our Solar System, brown dwarfs had
long been thought to exist. Actually finding them, however, proved
difficult. After decades of searching, astronomers found the first
brown dwarf in 1995, and a few dozen now are known.
The strong radio emission was unexpected because brown dwarfs,
according to conventional theories, are not supposed to have
magnetic fields strong enough to generate the radio emission.
"The presumed internal structure of
a brown dwarf will not permit a strong enough magnetic field,"
"It looks like we're going to have
to re-examine how we believe brown dwarfs work," he said.
(National Radio Astronomy
Imagine, students discovered something
that, according to the standard theories, had no right to exist.
Note that the emission is 10,000 times stronger than "expected." Not
10 times, not 100 times, not even 1000 times! It is 10,000 times
Judging by the lack of evident damage to the planetary orbits (all
orbits being nearly circular, with some irregularities for Neptune
and Pluto), Hills concluded that that no black dwarf more massive
than 0.05 of the mass of the Sun has entered the planetary system
from interstellar space.
Ark: In 1985 Los Alamos scientist J.G. Hills published a paper 
analyzing possible consequences of a passage of a hypothetical
stellar companion, ‘Nemesis’ (The
Passage of a "Nemesis"-like Object Through the Planetary System).
He estimated the probability for its
orbit to be perturbed by a passing star to be 15%. Judging by the
lack of evident damage to the planetary orbits (all orbits being
nearly circular, with some irregularities for Neptune and Pluto),
Hills concluded that that no black dwarf more massive than 0.02 of
the mass of the Sun has entered the planetary system from
That does not preclude the possibility
that Nemesis can cyclically send cometary showers towards the
internal solar system. Moreover, his conclusions are based on the
assumption that there are no corrections to the standard laws of
gravitation, which assumption may change in the future, when more
data become available from the deep space probes, and when we learn
more about the role of electric and magnetic interactions of cosmic
bodies and of space plasma.
LBL (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) physicist
devised the Nemesis theory  to account for regularity of the mass
extinctions discovered by Raup and Sepkowski  According to this
theory a companion star, called also cosmic terrorist Nemesis,
orbiting the Sun, perturbs the Oort comet cloud every 26 millions
years causing comet showers in the solar system. Muller believes
Nemesis is most likely a red dwarf star, magnitude between 7 and 12,
that should be visible with binoculars once localized.
In 1999 Matese, Whitman and Whitmire published a paper  in which
they came to a similar conclusions by statistical analysis of 82 new
class I Oort cloud comets. The next paper, entitled
Evidence for a Brown Dwarf Solar Companion,  uses an extended
database which has increased the number of comets from 82 to 89.
putative brown dwarf is expected to be located somewhere along the
arc of 135 and 135+180=315 degrees of galactic longitude:
Graph by Matese
showing cometary scatter patterns which may suggest the orbit of the
“Perturber.” By permission.
When we look at the mythology of the
"Winged Disc" that occurs in both Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt, we
begin to realize that this symbol does not refer to a "Tenth Planet," but
to the presence in our own solar system of the Sun's dark
sister, a failed star classified as a "brown dwarf."
It also seems to be the one hypothesis that encompasses all the
"sub-hypotheses" of the many researchers who have attempted to deal
with different aspects of the problems of the past and future of the
Sitchin proposed that a "10th Planet" caroms through the inner solar
system. Scientific evidence does not support a body the size he
suggests, entering into the inner solar system. However, science can
support a cluster of comets spread out in space that returns at
3,600 year intervals.
Sitchin suggests that his 10th planet is inhabited by the
Anunnaki/Nephilim. He claims that they are
our creators and masters.
His ideas are tremendously out of synch with the strong
circumstantial evidence about the alien presence on this planet.
Sitchin's ideas are also flawed for the other reasons we have
already mentioned, though he has certainly produced inspired work in
his interpretations of
the Sumerian texts as being related to "alien
interactions" and the periodic return of something!
Other theorists suggest that the Dark Companion of the Sun has its
own habitable planetary system, home to the mythical 'gods' of the
ancient world. This theory, that a brown dwarf with its own
planetary system, is able to pass through the Oort cloud and the
Kuiper belt, keeping its own mini-solar system intact, is obviously
In the same way that Sitchin simply passes
right over the problems of Nibiru seeding life on earth, forgetting
that evolutionary processes that are being postulated must apply to
the creator of the "Dark Star: Have Planets; Will
Travel" theory also does not consider the fundamental problem of
such an idea.
The two great themes of myth are the yearning for the golden age and
a terror of a world destroying catastrophe. And the two ideas are
inextricably linked to each other. In virtually all of the stories
about the Fall from Eden and the Flood of Noah, the great celestial
bodies in the heavens were said to have been out of control.
Kochab is an obscure Arabic name that might simply mean "star." It
is just barely the second brightest, and appropriately the Beta,
star in Ursa Minor, and represents the top front bowl star of the
Little Dipper. Only 15 degrees from the north celestial pole, middle
northerners can see it every night as it follows its small circular
path. Together with the other bowl star (Pherkad, the Gamma star),
it makes a small asterism called the "Guardians of the Pole." In
myth, it seems that the function of these stars is to "protect" the
pole star. (This star has run out of hydrogen fuel and is an
evolving orange giant star running on helium, giving off infrared
The importance of this star is that it
was referred to as the 'Mill Peg' and with the other stars
surrounding the North Pole, was called the "hole of the mill peg
because they represent as it were, a hole (the axle ring) in which
the mill axle turns since the axle of the equator (the polar axis)
is to be found in this region, fairly close to the star Al-jadi
(Polaris). There is a myth associated with this that the Mill Peg
which held the earth upright had broken loose and the polar axis had
Now the serpent connected to the Garden of Eden story and Draconis
was the old, evil serpent. The constellation Draco and Hercules and
Ophiuchus and Serpens are associated in ancient mythology,
illustrating the struggle between mankind and serpent-kind. In
ancient times, Draconis was on top of the World-tree and laid in the
same plane as the equator, so the days and nights were equal year
round - a true `paradise'. When the axis of the earth tilted, the
'Serpent was cast down'.
What seems to be a more "pristine" version of the story is that of
Amlodhi, of Icelandic legend, who owned a mill which, in his own
time, “ground out peace and plenty.” Later, in decaying times, it
ground out salt. Finally, it fell to the bottom of the ocean and was
grinding out rock and sand, creating a vast whirlpool, the
Maelstrom. According to Giorgio De Santillana and Hertha Von Dechend,
this myth was evidence for an astronomical process, the precession
of the zodiac. This is the shifting of the sun through the signs of
the zodiac, and, according to them, it determines “world ages.”
Now it is time to locate the origin of the image of the Mill, and
further, what its alleged breakup and the coming into being of
Whirlpool can possibly mean.
The starting place is in Greece. Cleomedes (c. AD 150), speaking of
the northern latitudes, states (1.7):
“The heavens there turn around
in the way a millstone does.”
Al-Farghani in the East takes up the
same idea, and his colleagues will supply the details. They call the
star Kochab, Beta Ursae Minoris, “mill peg,” and the stars of the
Little Bear, surrounding the North Pole, and Fas al-rahha (the hole
of the mill peg),
“because they represent, as it were,
a hole (the axle ring) in which the mill axle turns, since the
axle of the equator (the polar axis) is to be found in this
region, fairly close to the star Al-jadi…"
These are the words of the Arab
Cosmographer al-Kazvini. Ideler comments:
“Koth, the common name of the Pole,
means really the axle of the movable upper millstone which goes
through the lower fixed on, what is called the ‘mill-iron."
…The Bhagavata Purana tells us how the virtuous prince Dhruva
was appointed as Pole star. The particular virtue of the prince,
which alarmed even the gods, is worth mentioning: he stood on
one leg for more than a month, motionless. This is what was
announced to him: “The stars and their figures, and also the
planets shall turn around you.”[…]
There is a remark by Trimalchio in
Petronius (Satyricon 39):
“Thus the orb of heaven turns around
like a millstone, and ever does something bad.”
It was not a foreign idea to the
ancients that the mills of the gods grind slowly, and that the
result is usually pain.
The nine grim goddesses who “once ground Amlodhi’s meal,” working
now that “host-cruel skerry quern” beyond the edge of the world, are
in Mundlfoeri, literally “the mover of the handle.” The word
mundil … is never used in the old Norse literature about any
other object than the sweep or handle with which the movable
millstone is turned.
Here we have a clue that refers directly to something that "turns
the mill." The "nine grim goddesses," which we may identify with
Egyptian Ennead, are located in the "handle."
The case is then established. But there is an ambiguity here which
discloses further depths to the idea.
“Moendull” comes from Sanskrit “Manthati,”
says Rydberg, “it means to swing, twist, bore …Its direct
application always refers to the production of fire by
And here we see the idea of a binary
star system moving in tandem orbit with one another.
The identity of the Mill, in its many versions, with heaven is thus
universally understood and accepted. But hitherto nobody seems to
have wondered about the second part of the story, which also occurs
in the many versions.
How and why does it always
happen that this Mill, the peg of which is Polaris, had to
be wrecked or unhinged?
Once the archaic mind had
grasped the forever enduring rotation, what caused it to
think that the axle jumps out of the hole?
What memory of catastrophic
events has created this story of destruction?
Why should Vainamoinen … state
explicitly that another Mill has to be constructed?
Why had Dhruva to be appointed
to play Pole star – and for a given cycle?
For the story refers in no way to the
creation of the world.
The simple answer lies in the facts of the case. The Pole star does
get out of place, and every few thousand years another star has to
be chosen which best approximates that position. It is well known
the Great Pyramid, so carefully sighted, is not oriented at our
Pole Star, but at alpha Draconis, which occupied the position at the
pole 5,000 years ago. …It is the more difficult for moderns to
imagine that in those far-off ages men could keep track of such
imperceptible shifting, as many of them are not aware of the mere
This remark about the Pyramid being oriented to Draconis is an
ignorant remark. The fact is, the orientation of the pyramid to the
pole remains constant. It is only the pole stars that change.
Most of these myths, however, come under a misleading name. They
have been understood to deal with the end of the world. …What
actually comes to an end is a world, in the sense of a world-age.
Coherence will be reestablished in this welter of traditions if it
is realized that what is referred to is the grandest of heavenly
Precession of the Equinoxes.
The precession of the
equinoxes, also known as the Platonic Year, is caused by
the slow wobbling of the earth's polar axis. Right now
this axis roughly points to Polaris, the "Pole Star,"
but this changes slowly over long periods of time. The
earth's wobble causes the position of the seasonal
quarters to slowly precess against the background of
For example, right now,
the winter solstice position is in the constellation of
Sagittarius. But 2000 years ago it was in Capricorn.
Since then, it has precessed backward almost one full
sign. It is generally thought that the Greek astronomer
Hipparchus was the first to discover precession around
128 B.C. Yet scholarship indicates that more ancient Old
World cultures such as the Egyptians (see Schwaller de
Lubicz's book Sacred Science) and Babylonians also knew
about the precession.
This phenomenon is called the Precession of the
Equinoxes, and it was conceived as causing the rise and
the cataclysmic fall of ages of the world. Its cause is
a bad habit of the axis of our globe, which turns around
in the manner of a spinning top, its tip being in the
center of our small earth-ball, whence our earth axis,
prolonged to the celestial North Pole, describes a
circle around he North Pole of the ecliptic, the true
"center" of the planetary system, the radius of this
circle being of the same magnitude as the obliquity of
the ecliptic with respect to the equator: 23 ½ o.
The time which this
prolonged axis needs to circumscribe the ecliptical
North Pole is roughly 26,000 years, during which period
it points to one star after another: around 3000 B.C.
the Pole star was alpha Draconis; at the time of the
Greeks it was beta Ursae Minoris; for the time being it
is alpha Ursae Minoris; in A.D. 14,000 it will be Vega.
The equinoxes, the points of intersection of ecliptic
and equator, swinging from the spinning axis of the
earth, move with the same speed of 26,000 years along
Now, did you notice what these two authors have done here?
from their abysmally ignorant remark about the orientation of the
pyramids to Draconis, they have resorted to Uniformitarianism to
explain the great mystery of this worldwide myth of the “unhinging”
of the Pole star. They, and many, many others, have followed this
path, believing that all the clues from ancient monuments and myths
have to do simply with measuring time, “World Ages,” in more or less
“cultural” and historical terms.
The World Age of the Hebrews was
the age of the Ram, symbolized by Abraham taking his son to
sacrifice him, and a Ram appeared in the thicket, and such other
allusions. The age of Pisces, the age of Christ, is symbolized by
the fish, and numerous allusions are dredged up to support that one.
Now, we are supposed to be entering (or have already done so,
depending on your source), the Age of Aquarius.
I should point out right here that if the Precession of the Zodiac
was such a great way to measure time and world ages, there wouldn’t
be so many opinions about when one began and another ended. As a
measure of time that is so “vastly elegant,” it ought to at least
Well, it doesn’t. What is more, the zodiac has been created and
altered within recorded history, having at various times ten signs,
eleven, twelve and thirteen. So, what's the point? From this
perspective, there isn't one except for an attempt to deny the
possibility that the ancients meant exactly what they said even if
they did tell the stories as allegories.
But still, using this Precession as a giant clock, with some
fantastic perambulations through archaic lore, a dozen or more
authors have produced as many different versions of what a “world
age” is, and “when” they begin and end, and how. They then try to
link these ages to all sorts of weird theories from the opening of "stargates"
to galactic core explosions to "monuments to the end of time."
The answer is a lot more simple than that. I think that those things
that point us to the idea that the pole comes “unhinged” do, indeed
point to the Precession. But the important thing about this
Precession is that it points us to the fact that the Earth WOBBLES.
And I think that the thing the ancients are trying most desperately
to point out to us in these stories is that the Earth wobbles for a
REASON, and we ought to notice this wobble and ask some questions
about the "nine grim goddesses" who "turn the handle" and where and
what that "handle" might be that increases friction to the point
that fire is produced!
In Snorri’s Gylfaginning, there is a prediction for the future
given in the Song of the Sybyl, followed by a dialogue between
King Gylfi and the Aesir, disguised as men. King
“What happens when the whole world
has burned up, the gods are dead, and all of mankind is gone?
You have said earlier that each human being would go on living
in this or that world.”
The answer is that there are several
worlds for the good and the bad. Then Gylfi asks:
“Shall any gods be alive, and shall
there be something of earth and heaven?"”
And the answer is:
The earth rises up from the sea
again, and is green and beautiful and things grow without
Vidar and Vali are alive, for neither the sea nor the
flames of Surt have hurt them and they dwell on the Eddyfield,
where once stood Asgard. There come also the sons of Thor, Modi,
and Magni, and bring along his hammer. There come also Balder
and Hoder from the other world. All sit down and converse
together. They rehearse their runes and talk of events of old
Then they find in the grass the
golden tablets that the Aesir once played with. Two children of
men will also be found safe from the great flames of Surt. Their
names, Lif and Lifthrasir, and they feed on the morning dew and
from this human pair will come a great population which will
fill the earth. And strange to say, the sun, before being
devoured by Fenrir, will have borne a daughter, no less
beautiful and going the same ways as her mother.”
Again, the authors of
Hamlet’s Mill take
a prosaic view of these matters, pronouncing sagely that it is “just
And again, I have to disagree. I do not think that the
point is to “measure time,” in the sense of “world ages” of culture,
civilizations, or even “psychic” or occult influences, except in
that they relate to something far more important: WHAT IS CAUSING
THE WOBBLE AND WHAT CAN BE THE RESULT?
And we have a clear answer in Snorri's tale: The sun will have borne a daughter...
In this sense, the ancients might have supposed, and quite rightly,
that if we ever noticed this fact, if we were pointed in this
direction, if we were plainly told that there is a handle that turns
the axis, that this handle gets hot, that the axis of the planet
comes unhinged, that it started out spinning upright and then
gradually wobbled out of place and finally FALLS OVER INTO THE SEA,
that we would be clever enough to get it.
The clue they are pointing out to us is
that there is something OUT THERE that is the HANDLE and we ought to
be able to figure out, by applying principles of atomic physics to
celestial mechanics, exactly what it is and what it does. The
repeated references to the “dying and rebirth of the Sun,” in some
sort of cosmic hierogamy and the Sun giving birth to a daughter, or
having a Celestial Twin ought to be pretty plain clues to anybody
who is paying attention to these things.
Now, getting to the recent pronouncements about Zecharia Sitchin and
The email forwarded to me said:
Zecharia Sitchin, the world renowned scholar & archaeologist now
finally agrees, quote:
"I prophesize the return of this
planet called Nibiru AT THIS TIME!" -
Trusting the Pentagon/gov't to guard
itself & relay needed information to protect you is clearly
illogical. In July the red planet "2001 KX76" was disclosed.
was the original cover-label for Planet X, Nibiru, Wormwood, or THE
MOST REVERED HEAVENLY BODY IN ALL ANTIQUITY. After 3600 years on its
regular orbit it will pass again in SPRING 2003. It's RECORDED IN
ANCIENT TEXTS & the SCIENCE OF ARCHEOLOGY shows its effect on Earth
with each passage. Yes, some conspiracies are without merit,
ignoring history and science is another matter.
By August 2001 the disinformation had changed to the LARGEST
ASTEROID EVER and it's now shown as blue. It's the same label on a
When the attention was drawn to the area by announcing the "Largest
Asteriod" was there, they made sure the color of the new "2001 KX76"
was blue. All speculation about a large DULL RED brown dwarf being
there was to be avoided. This is one of their tactics for hiding
Planet X. First giving it a label, then using that same label for
another object to misdirect attention. X is not a red KBO. The
original color was not red for photographic reasons. Too many
stories for the color change is just the first of many obvious clues
of a cover up. They will continue to identify objects ahead and
around X to misdirect attention.
The normal helpful & professional NASA employees are being evasive &
condescending when asked about it.
X has INTENTIONALLY BEEN MADE TO
SOUND RIDICULOUS and confusing for several reasons. One of which
is to avoid causing panic among the world's population. Many
websites and articles continue to be written about Planet X that
spread lies. They say it only MAY exist and comes around only
once every few million years IF it does. This disinformation is
X orbits between our sun and its
dark twin. A diagram from the 1987 NEW SCIENCE & INVENTION
ENCYCLOPEDIA shows our dead twin sun & the 10th planet.
X's MASS, MAGNETISM & DENSITY is
such that it DISRUPTS the surface of EVERY PLANET IT PASSES. In
fact, history shows approximately 7 YEARS PRIOR to its passage
its far reaching eletromagnetic/gravitational influence changes
Earths core flows TRIGGERING WEATHER, VOLCANIC & SEISMIC
Since early 1996 traditional WEATHER
has CHANGED DRAMATICALLY, breaking all time records regularly.
The up-tick of QUAKES, VOLCANIC INCIDENTS & changes in
ELECTROMAGNETICS are being kept out of the media as much as
possible. Weather alone can falsely be blamed on global warming
& sun cycles but not earths rumblings at the same time.
Research the advent of PLANET X and the
cataclysms it will trigger by passing EARTH. Being prepared and
FOREWARNED gives one an EXCELLENT CHANCE to SURVIVE. "BLINDSIDED,
PLANET X Passes in 2003, EARTHCHANGES!"
Even the majority of the earth-change intuitives prophecies are tied
into or name Planet X.
ALL OTHER NEWS PALES IN COMPARISON TO THIS IMPENDING MEGA WORLD WIDE
EVENT OF BIBLICAL PROPORTIONS.
Well, when I went to the above websites to get the confirmation that
"Planet X" had been sighted, I found the following (excerpted):
July 3, 2001
The discovery of a large
reddish chunk of something orbiting in Pluto's neighborhood has
re-ignited the idea that there may be more than nine planets in
the solar system.[...] What the discoverers are calling 2001
KX76 might be one of the largest "Kuiper Belt Objects" or KBO's,
found in the what is essentially a second asteroid belt beyond
the orbit of Neptune.
Initial reports give 2001 KX76 a diameter
of 900 to 1200 kilometers - roughly the size of Pluto's moon, Charon. Pluto itself, it should be noted, is smaller than our
Now, please note right up front here
that this very first announcement is rather straightforward about
the issue as to whether or not this object ought to be called a
"planet" or not. The email above waxes hysterical about color, but
pays absolutely no attention to the size designation.
Here is the initial photo:
"Because KBOs are believed to have
very elongated orbits around the sun they spend a lot of time on
dark, centuries-long excursions into deep space. That makes them
very hard to find, said astronomer Robert Millis, director of
the Lowell Observatory, which was involved in the discovery.
"There are certainly lots of (KBOs) in distant parts of their
orbits now and we can't detect them," said Millis. The
possibility that 2001 KX76 has big brothers and sisters again
raises the thorny question of what can be called a planet and
what cannot. [...]
Historically, Pluto was designated a planet
when it was discovered in the 1930s because it was thought to be
much larger than it is, Marsden said. [...]
If 2001 KX76 is any
indication of larger KBOs out there, it might also lead to the
demotion of Pluto from puniest planet to king of KBOs, said
Marsden. Millis prefers a third alternative: "There may exist a
new class of planets."
Now, please notice the point of the
discussion and the size of the object and its distance from us: the
orbit of PLUTO. 1200KM. Let's have a look at the issue in the second
site referred to in the above, hysterical email wherein it is now
claimed that the disinformation process has set in by changing the
color of the object in both the photo and the article:
23 August 2001: Ceres, the first
asteroid (minor planet) to be discovered in the Solar System,
has held the record as the largest known object of its kind for
two centuries. However, recent observations at the European
Southern Observatory with the world's first operational virtual
telescope 'Astrovirtel' have determined that the newly
discovered distant asteroid "2001 KX76" is significantly larger,
with a diameter of 1200 km, possibly even 1400 km.
"Caption: ESO PR Photo 27a/01 shows a reproduction of a colour
composite image, based on three exposures with the Wide Field
Imager (WFI) at the MPG/ESO 2.2-m telescope at the La Silla
By combining data from the world's first
operational "virtual telescope", Astrovirtel, with that from a
conventional telescope at the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
at La Silla (Chile), European astronomers have determined the
size of the newly found, remote asteroid, 2001 KX76.
Their measurements indicate that
this icy rock has a diameter of at least 1200 km and is
therefore larger than any other known asteroid in the Solar
System. The previous record-holder, the asteroid Ceres, was also
the first object of its type to be discovered - by the Italian
astronomer Giuseppe Piazzi on January 1, 1801. Its diameter is
about 950 km, relegating it to second place after holding the
asteroid size record for two hundred years."
Note: The 'Virtual
Observatory' concept, for which "Astrovirtel" is a
prototype, is the start of a new era in astronomy. A larger
study project called the 'Astrophysical Virtual Observatory' is
now about to start within the Fifth EC Framework programme as a
collaboration between ESO, ESA (ST-ECF), the University of
Edinburgh (UK), CDS (Strasbourg, France), CNRS (Paris, France)
and the University of Manchester (UK).
Observatory (ESO). Credit to "ESA, ESO, Astrovirtel and Gerhard
Hahn (German Aerospace Center, DLR)".
Members of the group of scientists involved in these
observations are: Gerhard Hahn (German Aerospace Center, DLR,
Claes-Ingvar Lagerkvist (Uppsala University, Sweden;
Karri Muinonen, Jukka Piironen and Jenni Virtanen (University of
Andreas Doppler and Arno Gnaedig (Archenhold Sternwarte, Berlin,
Germany) and Francesco Pierfederici (ST-ECF/ESO).
Now, let's just get clear about this.
The very first article was about an object that no one was sure
whether they ought to call it a planet or not. It was larger than
what we call asteroids, but smaller than Pluto. So, it was, at
first, called a planet. But please note, the size was given in the
first article, and it was then reiterated, only given a likelihood
of being slightly larger than the original estimate in the second
So, the entire discussion was about
whether to call this object a planet or an asteroid. And,
apparently, it was decided that "asteroid" was a better choice until
the decision about what size constituted being a planet was decided
once and for all.
Asteroid 2001 KX76
Relative Sizes of
Large Kuiper Belt Objects
And how BIG is this putative "Planet X". This gigantic and
terrifying object that Zecharia Sitchin predicted and which is now
being claimed to be hidden from us in this tricky shell-game by
Well, have a look for yourself.
The first scientific results from Astrovirtel have allowed a
substantial improvement of the accuracy of the computed orbit for
2001 KX76. It is now possible to confirm that this object is just
outside that of the most remote known major planet Pluto.
Further analysis carried out by the team seems to indicate that the
orbit of 2001 KX76 is very similar to that of Pluto. Asteroid 2001
KX76 is even larger than Pluto's moon Charon (diameter 1150 km),
adding fuel to the discussions concerning Pluto's status as a
"major" or "minor" planet. The new data show that 2001 KX76 is about
half the size of Pluto (diameter about 2300 km) and this increases
the likelihood that there are other bodies still to be discovered in
the outer Solar System that are similar in size to Pluto.
The first observations of 2001 KX76 were quite sparse, so the
initial estimates of the size of the new asteroid were very
uncertain. However, it did look large, possibly about the same size
as the largest known asteroid, Ceres, the diameter of which had
earlier been measured at about 950 km.
In order to measure the size of any asteroid, it is necessary first
to determine its orbit around the Sun, which gives its present
distance from the Earth. The next step is to estimate its "albedo",
i.e. the percentage of incident sunlight reflected from its surface.
From these numbers and the measured, apparent brightness of the
asteroid (as seen from the Earth), its diameter can finally be
To determine the orbit of 2001 KX76, the group used "Astrovirtel" to
apply automatic search software to scan through "old" photographic
plates obtained with various astronomical telescopes, as well as
recent CCD observations made with the ESO Wide Field Imager (WFI) at
the MPG/ESO 2.2 m telescope on La Silla (Chile). The search was
successful: the astronomers were able to find several photographic
plates on which faint images of 2001 KX76 could be identified - some
of these plates had been obtained as early as 1982.
The exact sky positions were measured
and with accurate positional data now available over a time span of
no less than 18 years, the team was able to compute the first,
high-precision orbit of 2001 KX76. This also allowed to determine
that the current distance from the Earth which turned out to be
about 6.5 billion km, corresponding to 43 times the distance of the
Earth from the Sun, or nearly one-and-a-half times farther from the
Sun than Neptune.
Thanks to the work of this group of astronomers, the orbit of 2001
KX76 may now be considered relatively secure and it may therefore
soon receive a real name.
Now, what are we to make of all of this?
It's fairly evident that I am not saying that something is not going
to happen. After laying out the evidence that there is, indeed, a
3600 year cycle, and that the last "hit" was right around 3600 years
ago, no one can accuse me of not being as "catastrophic" as the next
person. In fact, I think that what we are suggesting here, including
our findings that something is definitely being hidden from us, is
singularly catastrophic. In fact, it is damn scary.
However, we believe that having accurate information about these
matters is not just important, but that it is CRUCIAL. Does the
reader have any idea of how long it takes an object in the
neighborhood of Pluto to get here?
Pluto is 6,000,000,000 km from Earth. If you travel at 100 km/hr,
you could get to Pluto in 6849.3years Moving at 1,000 MPH, it will
take 684.9 years to get to Pluto, or vice versa. So please, take it
to the bank that the object sighted in the neighborhood of Pluto is
NOT Nibiru/Planet X and it is NOT going to arrive in 2003.
Unfortunately, I cannot guarantee that there will not be an asteroid
strike in 2003, or anytime between now and then. THAT could happen
If there is a brown dwarf perturber that
slams through the Oort cloud, and if we do have a cluster of comets
that travels on a 3600 year orbit, then there is NO WAY to have ANY
warning whatsoever without the willingness of the government and the
scientists who have control of the instruments of observation to
share their data with us. And I can promise you that if a panic
ensues from false alarms such as this nonsense about Nibiru, there
will be no possibility of any sharing of data, and if it is going to
happen, you won't know.
The Cassiopaeans have given us the clues. We have followed and are
continuing to follow them and make discoveries that are grounded in
scientific fact. We have discovered that there is, indeed, a Control
System; that the influence of science has been to institute a form
of Thought Control. But it most certainly does not operate the way
the Rumormongers and purveyors of hysterical, half-baked theories
would have us believe.
What is more, there is much, much more to this matter at the present
time than meets the eye. There are many other clues, and we are
making discoveries regarding these clues almost daily. We are also
coming under increasing financial pressure that is obviously an
attempt to prevent further discoveries, as well as deliberate
attacks from various "cells" of the Thought Police intended to
dissuade us from pursuing our present research.
What do I think? I think that, based on what the Cassiopaeans have
said, supported by our research to this point, it is very likely
that we are already experiencing some of the comets from the cluster
that has been cycling through the solar system on that 3600 year
In fact, we - or our Moon - may get hit by a couple of small
ones in the next year or two. But I think that, for the most part,
this former group has lost its potency. It is scattered and
dissipated. Indeed, it seems likely that it is time for the birth of
a new cluster from "between the thighs of the Ennead."
I think that we will witness some amazing astronomical phenomena in
the next few years. "Signs in the Sun and Moon." I think that the
powerful activity of the Sun during this sunspot maximum has been
because its companion is drawing close. It is not yet close enough
to be seen, but that will probably change. We may see it in the next
year or two. There will be more solar activity.
The companion star will be seen to
"interact" with its primary similar to observations of other binary
star interactions. A "hieros gamos" of cosmic proportions will take
place. Earthquakes will shake the earth. Volcanoes will erupt.
Sitchin will go on a veritable world tour of lectures declaring that
this is the appearance of Nibiru and that he was "the first" to
predict it. He will be lionized, courted, interviewed, and trotted
out on all the television shows. Oprah will kiss his cheek and Art
Bell will give him a regular spot.
But the important thing to remember is this: It will not be a planet
Nibiru. There is no "Planet Nibiru." But there IS a sun's companion,
Nemesis. And, even if this companion star is seen,
it will never
enter the inner solar system. That is not the way these types of
bodies interact with each other. The closest that Nemesis will come
is probably the orbit of Pluto. It will then "go away." Everyone
will settle down and think that nothing is going to happen.
will be disgraced because his predicted giant planet won't do what
he says it will do. Oprah will no longer take his calls, and Art
Bell will not answer his faxes.
But that will not be the end of the matter... Because the important
thing to remember about the appearance of a Dark Star at the outer
reaches of our solar system is that, in order to get close enough to
be seen, it has to pass through the Oort cloud and the Kuiper
belt... like a bowling ball through a row of pins.
What is more, the
macrocosmic quantum changes that could result from an interaction
between a binary star system are too poorly known, and may
contribute to an entirely different cometary itinerary. Cometary
bodies that are slammed into the Solar System by a gravitationally
heavy object may proceed rather more quickly than one would suppose.
And so, in addition to whatever is left over of a cyclical cometary
swarm from the previous interaction with our Sun's companion, will
be augmented by a whole new grouping.
In closing, allow me to repeat a quote from Noah:
One of the chief proponents of
catastrophe theory in the last century was
Criticisms aimed at Velikovsky included remarks stating that his
vision “showed little respect for the laws of physics: In his
books, planets change orbits - in blatant violation of the laws
of mechanics - and go crashing into other planets.”
Is this attack really justified? Is talk
about jumping planets evidence of ignorance, as the authors of Three
Big Bangs seem to imply?
In a paper published in a collection entitled:
The Stability of the
Solar System and of Small Stellar Systems, Jeno M. Barthomy
“It is conceivable that when the
Earth was formed, it occupied a higher quantum state, and by
releasing energy in the form of gravitational waves ‘jumped’ to
its present ‘ground state.’ I do not wish as yet to speculate on
a possible gravitational wave spectrum emitted from newly formed
planetary systems in the universe.”
How can such jumps occur in terms of
more conventional concepts' G.J Sussman and Jack Wisdom wrote in
“The evolution of the Solar System
is chaotic. Exponential divergence of nearby trajectories is
indicative of chaotic behavior.”
Up to the present time the computer
simulations that have been done  have not even attempted to take
into account a possible cosmic intruder - the brown dwarf Sun’s
companion whose existence and properties have been researched by R.
Muller and J. Matese. 
They also did not try to take into account
a possible fractal structure of space-time, which was the subject of
a series of papers and of a monograph by French astrophysicist
I have discussed Nottale’s rules of quantization of planetary
systems in my notes in the present work. Here it is enough to say
that fractal and multidimensional structure of space-time, along the
ideas put forward by many physicists, astronomers and
astrophysicists, whose works are quoted in this book, make cosmic
My own research added one more factor here: as
discussed in this work, it is one of the conclusions of EEQT that,
as a rule, couplings of quantum systems to classical ones induce
chaotic behavior and fractal-like patterns of quantum jumps. That
may be one of the reasons why space-time is fractal-like both in
micro- and in macro-scale.
The event generating algorithm that is at the foundation of EEQT can
be easily modified, using cosmic scale coupling constants, to
describe such jumps in terms of a piecewise deterministic Markov
process, when prolonged periods of continuous evolution are
interspersed by jumps of a random character.
The main feature of EEQT is that it provides an algorithm for
describing the history of an individual system, where jumps really
take place. Therefore it provides appropriate tools for dealing not
only with micro-particles but also with cosmic bodies, as discussed
in this present work.
It may also put tools into our hands that will help us to intervene
in the “events” of Cosmic Catastrophe.
The primary message of Noah is that one such continuous period may
be coming to an end soon, and that the target quantum state after
the jump is not fully determined. Our actions, or our lack of action
now, shape the probability distribution of our future “after the
Paraphrasing slightly the quote from Niels Bohr’s friend
as used in John Archibald Wheeler’s Geons, Black Holes and Quantum
We need to know
what this whole show
is all about
before it’s out.
And time is running out.
 Hills 85
 Muller 88, Muller 96
 Raup 86
 Matese 99
 Matese 00
 Talk about your lame interpretation! Next they will be
saying that the ancients were howling savages who smeared bear
grease in their hair!
 We notice that the authors don't jump on this pregnant
 And here I beg to differ.
 It is far more difficult for me to comprehend how these two
authors can be talking about the ancients grasping this concept,
and then to wonder why anyone with the brains to do so would
even care! That is, assuming it is just a "concept."
 De Santillana & Von Dechend,
Hamlet’s Mill,1977, David R. Godine, Boston
 Snorri Sturlson, author of the Prose Edda.
 Norse gods.
 This shows clearly to what extent the greenhouse effect has
been overestimated in comparison with the solar contribution to
climate change, which turns out to be the most important factor.
 [Muller 96]
 [Barthomy 74]
 [Wisdom 92]
 [Wisdom 01]
 [Matese 99, 00, Mueller 88, 96]
 [Nottale 93, Nottale 97]
 [Blanchard 00, 01]
 [Wheeler 98]