|
by Arjun Walia
August
10, 2018
from
Collective-Evolution Website
Spanish version
Italian version
Source
In Brief
The Facts:
In 1962 Gordon MacDonald, a NASA scientist,
published a paper stating it's more like that
the moon is hollow than not. MIT's Sean C.
Solomon furthered this statement citing
knowledge of the moon's gravitation field as
evidence.
Reflect On:
What do we truly know about the moon? Why is it
that there is always such a great deal of
evidence that challenges the mainstream truths
about various things? Are we truly aware of the
truth of the world around us?
It is not out of the question that artifacts of these visits
still exist, or even that some kind of base is maintained
(possibly automatically) within the solar system to provide
continuity for successive expeditions.
Because of weathering
and the possibility of detection and interference by the
inhabitants of the Earth, it would be preferable not to erect
such a base on the Earth's surface. The Moon seems one
reasonable alternative.
Forthcoming high
resolution photographic reconnaissance of the Moon from space
vehicles - particularly of the back side - might bear these
possibilities in mind.
Carl Sagan
Controversy has
surrounded the Moon for a very long time, we have leaks, research
and information from some very credible sources who have, over a
span of decades, been relaying to the public that our Moon is not
what we think it is, and that there's also some type of
extraterrestrial presence on the Moon.
One example would be the testimony of Colonel Ross Dedrickson,
who was responsible for maintaining the inventory of the nuclear
weapon stockpile for the United States, he had a long stint with the
US Atomic Energy Commission.
Shortly before his passing, he told the world that the US
tried to detonate "atomic weapons"
on the Moon for scientific purposes, measurements and whatnot
and that this project was halted by extraterrestrials, who would not
allow us to detonate any nuclear weapons in space.
These were some
interesting comments because he is one of the hundreds of high
ranking military people who have alluded to such things, and we also
have a declassified report by the Air Force Nuclear Weapons
Center from June 1959 that shows how seriously they were
considering the plan, called
Project A119.
We know for a fact that they wanted to investigate the capability of
weapons in space, and if they did, we also know that we would never
be told, similar to the testing that goes on here on planet Earth.
Then, we have
remote viewers from the
STARGATE program who have 'seen'
strange structures and humanoid
creatures on the Moon, like
Ingo Swann (from his book,
titled
Penetration), for example.
He wasn't the only one
from the program who did, I have personally had conversations with
Dr. Paul Smith, a retired army veteran who spent a decade in
that program, he also relayed to me that something strange is
happening on the Moon.
Many from within that
program have been very outspoken about an extraterrestrial presence.
Multiple whistleblowers have also spoken of strange structures on
the Moon, and it's become so obvious that some academicians are
trying to do what they can to bring attention to it.
For example, a
recently (September 30, 2016) published paper in the
Journal of Space Exploration about certain features on the far
side of the Moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C.
Titled "Image
Analysis of Unusual Structures on the Far Side of the Moon in the
Crater Paracelsus C," it argues that these features might
be artificial in origin, meaning someone other than a human being
built them and put them there.
It's not just the Moon, a physicist from the University of Tennessee
Space Institute, Dr. Horace Crater, recently published a
paper in The Journal of Space Exploration that, along with
the NASA Viking images, hints,
"strongly at
artificial surface interventions."
The list is long, and the
idea that somebody else is on the moon is nothing new, even the
Deputy Manager for the
Clementine Mission to the moon in
1995 said it was really a photo reconnaissance mission to check out
structures on the far side of the Moon that wasn't put there by
humans...
But this article is not about what's on the moon, it's about what
'exactly' the Moon is.
It's also noteworthy to mention that the United States has been
criticized by Russia for concealing artifacts they collected from
the Moon.
What is the
Moon?
Perhaps strangest of
all the anomalies are the many indications that the moon may be
hollow.
Studies of moon rocks
indicate that the moon's interior differs from the Earth's
mantle in ways suggesting a very small core or none at all.
A 1962 study found
the interior of the moon to be less dense that the exterior.
Jim
Marrs
Our
Occulted History
Is the
moon
hollow?
Many intellectual minds
seem to think so, but despite what's really being talked about,
these theories are still considered unconventional by the
mainstream, who like to push their own theories and teach them as
fact.
Perhaps the reason why the US has not disclosed their artifacts from
the moon, including all of the rocks, is because from what we do
have, studies of moon rocks have shown that the Moon's interior is
far different from the Earth's mantle which suggests a very small
core, or, no core at all.
In 1962 Gordon MacDonald, a NASA scientist, published a study
that stated,
"Indeed, it would
seem that the Moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous
sphere."
According to MIT's
Sean C. Solomon,
"The Lunar Orbiter
experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the Moon's
gravitational field... indicating the frightening possibility
that the Moon might be hollow."
The most startling
evidence that the moon could be hollow came on November 20, 1969,
when the Apollo 12 crew, after returning to their command ship, sent
the lunar module (LM) ascent stage crashing back onto the moon,
creating an artificial moon quake.
The LM struck the surface
about forty miles from the Apollo 12 landing site, where super
sensitive seismic equipment recorded something both unexpected and
astounding - the
moon reverberated like a bell for
more than an hour.
Frank Press of MIT
stated,
"...none of us have
seen anything like this on Earth. In all our experience, it is
quite an extraordinary event. That this rather small impact...
produced a signal which lasted 30 minutes is quite beyond the
range of our experience."
How Did The
Moon Get To Where It Is?
Conventional wisdom tells us that yes, the Moon may have originated
elsewhere and at some point came to orbit our planet.
It tells us that it was
formed from debris after a space object smashed into Earth, while
another theory states that Earth captured the Moon via its
gravitational pull when it was wandering through the solar system...
Despite that our current theories are accepted as fact, there is
absolutely no evidence for the conventional hypothesis. According to
Russian scientist Isaac Asimov, an American writer and
professor of biochemistry at Boston University,
It's too big to have been captured by the Earth.
The chances of such a
capture having been effected and the Moon then having taken up
nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an
eventuality credible
Asimov also emphasized that,
We cannot help but
come to the conclusion that the Moon, by rights, ought not to be
there. The fact that it is, is one of those strokes of luck
almost too good to accept.
Other members of the
Soviet Academy of Sciences (Vasin and Scherbakov, 1970), run by the
Russian Government, published an article titled, "Is
the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?"
The article offered
another explanation for how the Moon may have been created.
This seems to be a better
hypothesis because there is actually a considerable amount of
evidence that points towards something suspicious happening on the
Moon.
It's
easier to explain
the
non-existence for the Moon,
than it's
existence.
NASA scientist
Robin Brett
The best
explanation for the Moon
is observational
error - the Moon doesn't exist.
Irwin Shapiro
Harvard
Astrophysicist
Think about it...
The Moon is in a nearly
perfect circle, when it comes to its origin, all the while being
synchronized with its period of revolution, so one side always faces
the Earth.
As Marrs points out,
This circular orbit
is especially odd, considering that the moon's center of mass
lies more than a mile closer to the Earth than its geometric
center.
This fact alone
should produce an unstable, wobbly orbit, much as a ball with
its mass off-center will not roll in a straight line.
Were The
Sumerians On To Something?
Many within this field are really into ancient Greek, and ancient
Sumerian lore.
Take
Apollo 12 astronaut, Al Worden,
for example, who made some very interesting comments about
the Sumerians as well as
extraterrestrial life in a live
interview you can watch here.
In the late 1960's, a senior scientist from the Planetary Science
Institute, William Kenneth Harmann, stated he believes that
the Moon results from a collision between Earth and another body at
least the size of mars.
This became known at the
Big Splash theory, and it
correlated to the story told in ancient Sumerian tablets...
According to several interpretations of Sumerian tablets, most
notably from
Zecharia Sitchin, more than 4
billion years ago, a large watery world called Tiamat was in orbit
between Mars and Jupiter.
Nibiru, a planet that supposedly
enters into our solar system once every 3,600 years, caused Tiamat
to crack under gravitational stress.
Tiamat was cracked in
half when one of Nibiru's moon's knocked into it, which also knocked
a large portion of mars.
This is very interesting because recently scientists have confirmed
that Mars used to be a very
watery world, an Earth-like planet.
There is even large amounts of evidence for ancient life on Mars
before what appears to be a dramatic climate shift.
Scientists hypothesize
that the climate shift was a result of a large collision... The
larger chunk of Tiamat became planet Earth.
So, it's interesting to make that connection.
Back to the
Moon!
It's important to
remember that something had to put the moon at or near its
present circular pattern around the Earth.
Just as an Apollo
space-craft circling the Earth every 90 minutes while 100 miles
high has to have a velocity of roughly 18,000 miles per hour to
stay in orbit, so something had to give the moon the precisely
required velocity for its weight and altitude...
The point - and it is
one seldom noted in considering the origin of the moon - is that
it is extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into
the right combination of factors required to stay in orbit.
'Something' had to
put the moon at its altitude, on its course and at its speed.
The question is: what
was that 'something?"
Marrs
It's hard to believe that
the precise and stationary orbit of the moon is simply a
coincidence...
Is it also a
coincidence that the moon is at just the right distance from
Earth to completely cover the sun during an eclipse?
While the diameter of
the moon is a mere 2,160, miles against the sun's gigantic
864,000 miles, it is nevertheless in just the proper position to
block out all but the sun's flaming corona when it moves between
the sun and Earth.
Marrs
According to Asimov,
"there is no
astronomical reason why the Moon and the sun should fit so well.
It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all
the planets is blessed in this fashion."
With all of the evidence
that has surfaced showing an extraterrestrial presence on the
Moon, to me, the spaceship theory proposed by Michael Vasin
and Alexander Scherbakov (mentioned above) makes the most
sense.
According to Marrs,
The
spaceship-moon theory may come closer than any other
in reconciling the contradictions inherent in the origin and
amazing orbit of the moon.
However, such a
consideration is supposed to be outside the discussion of
educated and rational people. The circular logic of conventional
science regarding the origins of the moon runs something like
this:
We know that
extraterrestrials don't exist, but we do know that the moon
exists and has been mentioned throughout human history.
We humans did not
create it nor place it in orbit around Earth, it must have been
done by extraterrestrials. But because we know they don't
exists, we will simply call it an anomaly and will not publicly
say any more about.
Source
|
