by Brandon Smith

September 07, 2023
from BirchGold Website








Rothschild admits

'ESG' Failure

as Globalists Shift to

"Inclusive Capitalism" Agenda...




In July of last year as the hype surrounding the Covid 'pandemic' was finally dying out I published an article about a barely publicized project called the "Council for Inclusive Capitalism" (CIC).


The group, headed by Lynn Forester de Rothschild who now seems to be the public face of the notorious Rothschild dynasty, is the culmination of decades of various globalist agendas combined to represent the ultimate proof of "New World Order" conspiracy.

Remember when people used to say that global governance by elitists was a paranoid fantasy...?

Well, now the plan is an openly admitted reality.



The CIC is intimately tied to institutions like,

...but it is primarily an attempt to link all these organizations more closely to the corporate world in an open display of collusion.


The group pushes the spread of what they call "Stakeholder Capitalism":

The idea that international corporations have a 'responsibility' to participate in social engineering, and that they are required (in the name of the greater good) to manipulate civilization through economic punishments and rewards...

We witnessed this agenda in action during the Covid lockdowns and the rush to enforce vaccine passports.


These efforts would not have been possible without the participation of major corporate chains working hand-in-hand with national governments and the World Health Organization (WHO).


Luckily, the strategy failed as local governments and the public fought back.

We have also seen the ugliness of stakeholder capitalism in the push for ESG rating systems among major companies. Most readers are probably familiar with 'ESG' at this point.

Just keep in mind that the public was oblivious to the terminology until the past 2 years.


Globalists have been developing ESG rules since 2005.

What is ESG...?


As Klaus Schwab of the WEF notes:

"The most important characteristic of the stakeholder model today is that the stakes of our system are now more clearly global.


Economies, societies, and the environment are more closely linked to each other now than 50 years ago. The model we present here is therefore fundamentally global in nature, and the two primary stakeholders are as well.

...What was once seen as externalities in national economic policy making and individual corporate decision making, will now need to be incorporated or internalized in the operations of every government, company, community, and individual.


The planet is thus the center of the global economic system, and its health should be optimized in the decisions made by all other stakeholders."

ESG was intended to be,

the tool that globalists and governments would use to force companies into the stakeholder capitalism model.


It is much like the Chinese communist social 'credit system', but for businesses rather than individuals.


The higher a company's ESG score, the more access lending and government funding they would have (easy money).


It started out in 2005 focused on climate controls (influencing corporations to accept carbon credits and taxation).

But, by 2016 it became something else:

ESG widely adopted woke politics including,

  • Critical Race Theory

  • feminism

  • trans ideology

  • various elements of Marxism, etc.

This was the modern ESG that all of us are aware of today.


The goal was,

to incentivize corporations into bombarding the public with woke messaging 24/7...:

every movie, every TV show, every book, every comic, every children's cartoon, every commercial, every product, every major social media site, every employee handbook, every social interaction,

...would be tainted with the poison of woke propaganda.


There would be nowhere to hide, nowhere to escape the messaging.

And it worked, for a little while...

The exposure of ESG is perhaps one of the greatest triumphs of the alternative media.


It was proof that the "wokification" of our economy and society was not the result of some grassroots activist movement or the natural evolution of civilization.


No, everything woke was a rigged agenda, an astroturf movement forced into existence by corporations and globalists using ESG as the vehicle.

It is with some disappointment I'm sure that,

Lynn Forester de Rothschild recently admitted the defeat of ESG at the G20 Summit in India...




Though, Rothschild also suggests that,

the goal will be to replace the term "ESG" with something else that the public is not as privy to...

In other words,

the globalists have been forced to abandon ESG but will continue to look for other methods to trap companies into the far-left hive...

It is typical for globalists to re-brand their projects whenever they get exposed as a way to throw the public off the scent.

However, I don't think this tactic is going to work anymore.


Researchers are locked onto the ESG dynamic and changing the name will not help the establishment avoid scrutiny.

Interestingly, I have noticed a dramatic shift by globalists towards a defensive posture, rather than the offensive posture they held a couple years ago.


I can only conclude that,

something went very wrong for them during Covid...

They were brazen with their rhetoric in 2020, basically admitting their intentions to enforce a global authoritarian system.


Now they are sheepish and much more careful in the things they say.

To this end, most of the honest discussion on globalism is no longer found in the statements of the WEF or the halls of the Davos forums.

People like Klaus Schwab are fading into the background.


The true agenda is now discussed at more obscure climate change events such as B20 in India or the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact in Paris which I covered in July.


These are the events where globalists feel more free to talk about what they REALLY want.

One interesting comment from Rothschild at B20 was her claim that Biden's "Inflation Reduction Act" is one of the best models for incentivized climate controls.


This confirms what we already suspected:

The Inflation Reduction Act had nothing to do with inflation...!


Rather, it was a way to divert taxpayer funds into government subsidies for carbon taxation and green tech.

That is to say, Rothschild and the CIC,

want to dictate global business and force companies to adopt ESG-like policies using trillions of dollars in climate funds ($7.5 trillion per year, to be exact)...



Look at it this way:

  • Any company that "volunteers" to use less efficient green tech and to promote climate ideology gets access to government subsidies: they get rewarded.


  • Any company that refuses to go along with the plan will ultimately face heavy taxation while trying to compete with their subsidized peers: they are forced out of business.

Sound familiar? It's not your imagination...

This is, essentially,

the early stages of a global communist/collectivist economic regime...



"Inclusive capitalism" is a hoax


And here we get to the crux of the issue.

There is no "inclusive capitalism."


There is no "stakeholder capitalism."


There is no "ESG."


Climate change is not an existential threat.


Covid was never as severe as they wanted you to think.

What do these things have in common?


All of these issues represent smoke and mirrors, a way to distract the populace from the root intent to create,

total centralization in the hands of a select few elites...!

The prize for them is to convince the public to embrace economic micromanagement.

This is what ESG was all about.


This is what Inclusive Capitalism is all about.


The globalists want to hand-pick winners and losers.


Worse still, they want to use your money to reward the faithful and punish the skeptical.

Their goal is to build a global economic panopticon, an inescapable prison where every transaction is monitored, evaluated, authorized or denied and (of course) recorded.


A central bank digital currency (CDBC) is a crucial milestone in their progress toward this goal.


Just imagine how much easier this will be when the 100 or so largest, most influential corporations in the world are on-board and enthusiastic about such a development...


I wrote about this not long ago:

All privacy in trade will be gone, except for those people engaging in barter, black markets and commodity-based transactions.


This is one of the main reasons global central banks have persistently killed the idea of intrinsically-sound money, like physical gold and silver, for the last 50 years.


Remember, barter and black markets are more or less by definition off the books. Untaxed, unregulated and untrackable.


But don't be misled - this is much more than an issue of privacy.


Implementation of CBDCs would also mean that ownership of money and the ability to transact, to participate in the economy, will become privileges, not rights.


In communist China,

use of digital payments is tied to a social credit system...

Want access to your checking and savings accounts?

Better not say anything critical of the Party, or you could be reported by a neighbor (or a stranger) using the tattletale function on their smartphone...

Digital money can disappear in seconds.


Want your money back?

Prove that you are "loyal" to the Party...

There are many subtle levels between "upstanding citizen" and "outlaw," though, and the CCP adjust their citizens' financial statuses constantly.

Bad social credit might mean taxis won't even stop for you.


That you're prevented from purchasing from upscale shops.


Insufficiently healthy? Your e-yuan won't even let you buy junk food at 7-11.



The citizen is guilty until proven innocent.

Once the economy is locked into an ideological prison and access to private trade can be denied by a handful of bureaucrats working with corporations, the establishment then has the means to dictate all of society.

Our behaviors, our beliefs, our principles, our morals...

For if the government has the power to determine whether you and your family eat or starve, they have the power to compel you to do anything.


This is why owning untraceable, intrinsically valuable physical precious metals is crucial to your own personal liberty.


Today, now, while you still can, diversify your savings with an alternative form of money that will always be accepted, without question, anywhere in the world.


There's a reason,

the globalists hate gold and silver. They're virtually the only financial assets you can own that are "off the books"...


Just as untrackable as cash (they hate cash, too, but not as much) and, better yet, uninflatable, unhackable and free from central bank meddling.

Fight the globalist agenda every step of the way.


And make sure that, no matter what, you and your loved ones can endure their tyranny without compromising your beliefs...