Charles has just given us
18 months to 'save the world'...
Over the past years, the
prince and his father (among other inbred aristocrats of
Europe) have taken an incredible interest in the safety of the earth
from the pollution emitting machines who greedily consume and
reproduce without any consideration for Mother Gaia.
In recent months this
green transformation of the globe has taken the form of the "Green
New Deal" promoted in the U.S. by Congresswoman
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and
Senator Bernie Sanders.
A children's campaign
endorsed by pope
Francis and led by
Greta Thunberg has spread
across Europe and America while a Billionaires Club under the
Al Gore, and
George Soros is funding a
Sunrise Movement to fight 'global warming.'
Is this passion to
save the planet from humanity genuine?
Do these oligarchs
and billionaires really care so much that their support for a
Green New Deal is as benevolent as the media portrays… or
is something darker at play?
To answer these
questions, we will have to first quickly review,
What is it?
As the name implies, the Green New Deal is a sweeping policy
agenda which takes its name from the
original New Deal of 1933 enacted
under the leadership of President Franklin Roosevelt.
The New Deal
was originally a program for bank reform, and mass
infrastructure building in order to heal America from the deep
wounds caused by 4 years of Great Depression.
While the Green
New Deal of 2019 proposes to dramatically overhaul the rules
of finance and infrastructure planning, its similarities to the
original end there.
Roosevelt's New Deal was driven by projects which
increased the productive powers of labor of the nation as a
whole by investments into hydroelectric projects, transportation
corridors, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and thousands of
other infrastructure projects.
The Green New Deal
on the other hand seeks to lower American productive powers of
labor and living standards by investments into zero growth green
Of course if that were
explicitly stated, no one would drink the Kool-Aid.
Putin and Trump have
both emphasized at various times not only has it never been proven
that "human-made" CO2 drives climate variations, but it
has also come to light that since 1998, the warming trend dominant
since 1977 has been on an strange "pause".
output steadily rose from 1938-1977, it was accompanied by a
total cooling causing scientists in 1977 to
sound the alarm that we were on the
verge of an ice age.
This fact reflects the
embarrassing reality that CO2 tends to
follow climate variations rather than precede
them, indicating that this greenhouse gas is actually being
effected by the warming of the earth most likely driven by
space-based causes as Putin has referred repeatedly.
Even more surprising to
some, recently published NASA studies have shown that the world's
biomass has increased by 10% in
recent years due in large measure to the industrial growth policies
of China and India.
Plants have, after all,
been observed to grow much better when fed by
of carbon dioxide.
Where did it
So how could so many 'respectable' scientists, journals and
politicians have possibly assumed a fallacy to be so
true that an overhaul of the entire global society is being
This obviously didn't
arise over night, but the current pressure to transform our entire
world to the undisputed "reality" of
man-made global warming finds its
true origins in the Malthusian revival of 1968-1972.
In this short interval of time, a vacuum left by the elimination of
pro-development leaders such as,
John F. Kennedy
Charles de Gaulle
...was filled by
establishment hacks and cowards.
These tools ushered in a
paradigm shift towards "conservationism" and rejected the industrial
growth ethic that defined western civilization up until that point.
This Malthusian Revival answered the challenge put forth by
Eugenics Society president and
UNESCO founder Julian Huxley who
wrote in 1946:
unification in some sort of world government will be required…
Even though… any
radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and
psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to
see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care,
and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so
that much that now is unthinkable may at least become
Of course, just one year
after the horrors of Nazi eugenics, Huxley and his
the Anglo-American elite who financed
Hitler had a big job to
clean up the image of eugenics and re-package it under another name.
The Club of
Rome and 1001 Nature Trust
In 1968, an organization was formed known as the
Club of Rome led by two
misanthropes named Aurelio Peccei and Sir Alexander King.
The organization quickly
set up branches across the Anglo-Saxon world with members ranging
from select ideologues from the political, business, and scientific
community who all agreed that society's best form of governance was
a scientific dictatorship.
Sir Alexander wrote:
"In searching for a
new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution,
the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the
like would fit the bill…
All these dangers are
caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed
attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then,
is humanity itself."
In order to finance this
paradigm shift, the
1001 Trust (Club)
was founded in 1970 by Prince
Bernhardt of the Netherlands.
Bernhardt (card carrying
Nazi and founder of the
Bilderberger Group in 1954) had
worked alongside his close misanthropic associates Prince Philip
Mountbatten, and Sir Julian Huxley to create the World
Wildlife Fund (WWF) just a few years earlier.
The plan was simple:
each of the 1001
founding members simply put $10,000 into the trust which was
then directed towards the green paradigm shift.
Other prominent 1001 Club
members included international royalty, billionaires, and
technocratic sociopaths who wanted nothing more than to manage this
Brave New World as "alphas".
Many of these figures
were also members of the Club of Rome, including Canada's
Maurice Strong, who later
became Vice President of the WWF under Prince Philip's presidency.
Strong had replaced
another WWF Vice President by the name of Louis Mortimer
Bloomfield was another
1001 Club member whom New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison
discovered to be at the heart of the
Montreal-based assassination of the
anti-Malthusian President John F. Kennedy in 1963.
The document which became the bible and blueprint of this new
anti-humanist movement that birthed today's Green New Deal
agenda was titled
Limits to Growth (1972) and today
holds the record as the most widely read book on ecology, having
sold 30 million copies published into 32 languages.
recent article celebrating the
book's 40 year anniversary stated,
"it helped launch
modern environmental computer modeling and began our current
globally focused environmental debate.
[To Growth], environmentalists, scientists and
policy-makers increasingly thought of ecological problems in
planetary terms and as dynamically interconnected…
It is worth
revisiting Limits today because, more than any other book, it
introduced the concept of anthropocentric climate change to a
The book itself (The Limits to Growth - The 30-year Update)
was the culmination of a two year study undertaken by a team of MIT
statisticians under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and
Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
today, these young MIT professors were merely cardboard cut-outs
selected to deflect from the higher social engineers managing the
show from the top.
The MIT study itself was not even begun in the USA, but rather in
Montebellow Quebec in 1971, when Club of Rome-backer Pierre
Trudeau allocated tax payer money to begin the project.
A network of Rhodes
Scholars and Privy Councillors centered around,
Lamontagne (founder of Environment Canada)
(Privy Council Clerk and founder of Canada's CSIS)
...among others, had
presided over that meeting.
When the Canadian funds
had served their role, the project continued to receive its funding
from the Volkswagen Foundation, whose Nazi-supporting past
should have made some of the MIT statisticians uncomfortable.
Sir Alexander King (left)
model produced by
Club of Rome's Limits to Growth
predicting an apocalyptic end
world by 2000 (right)
These Club of Rome/WWF/1001 Club members dubbed themselves "neo
Malthusians" referring to the ideology popularized by the British
Empire's Thomas Malthus.
Essay on the Principle of Population
pessimistically noticed that human population grows geometrically
while food production grows arithmetically leading invariably to a
crisis point of over-population.
This crisis point creates
a mathematical foundation for the concept that later came to be
dubbed "carrying capacity" by the authors of Limits to Growth.
Of course rather than
permit those human cattle from developing their minds in order to
make more discoveries and inventions which would offset this crisis
point, Malthus (and his heirs later) knew that the British Empire
which employed him could never exist were that creative power
Instead, Malthus coldly
advocated the elimination of the,
"unfit to make way
for the more fit."
Not adept at the
subtleties of modern 21st century newspeak, Malthus went
so far as to propose that even children perish:
"All children who are
born beyond what would be required to keep up the population to
a desired level must necessarily perish, unless room be made for
them by the deaths of grown persons… therefore we should
facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to
impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality"
By re-packaging Malthus'
assumptions into a more complex computing system, these
neo-Malthusians wanted to create a shame based movement of willful
self-annihilation among an entire generation of baby boomers.
Of course if you assume that technological progress has ended, then
it will certainly appear that a closed system of fixed limited
resources can only be managed by
a technocratic elite choosing who
gets diminishing returns as the world settles into some imaginary
"mathematical equilibrium" of sustainability.
Fortunately for humanity,
reality rarely conforms to the pessimistic ideals of racists and
A long time London trained asset and close collaborator of Canada's
Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, Maurice Lamontagne was
Club of Rome member, and former President of the
Of all Club of Rome
members, Lamontagne was the most candid in identifying the Earth's
greatest enemy to be human creativity itself.
Writing in his Senate
Committee Reports of 1968-1972 which reformed science policy funding
and planning, Lamontagne wrote:
definite constraints on technology itself and if man persists in
ignoring them the net effect of his action in the long run can
be to reduce rather than to increase nature's potential as a
provider of resources and habitable space…
But then, an obvious
question arises: How can we stop man's creativeness?"
that the yearning to discover the unknown is built into the human
condition, Lamontagne answers his own question, writing:
"How can we proclaim
a moratorium on technology?
It is impossible to
destroy existing knowledge; impossible to paralyze man's inborn
desire to learn, to invent and to innovate… In the final
analysis we find that technology is merely a tool created by man
in pursuit of his infinite aspirations and is not the
significant element invading the natural environment.
It is material growth
itself that is the source of conflict between man and nature".
Thus creativity and its
fruits of technological progress are acceptable only IF they reduce
the assumed conflict between man and nature posited by Lamontagne!
"Bad" technology in
Lamontagne's formulation, has the effect of increasing humanity's
material growth (i.e.: powers of productivity).
If, on the other hand, we
promote technologies of a low energy flux density form, such as
windmills, solar panels and biofuels, which lead to the reduction of
man's powers to exist, then technology can be defined as a "good"
thing" according to this twisted logic.
This concept was echoed by another Club of Rome member and
collaborator with Lamontagne on his Senate Report named Omond
Solandt made his career
as the science advisor to Lord Mountbatten (Prince Philip's
pedophiliac mentor) during WWII and headed the Defense Research
Board until 1957, where he collaborated on MK Ultra alongside the
infamous Ewan Cameron at McGill University.
"There is no longer
any need to advance science. The need is rather to understand,
guide and use science effectively for the welfare of mankind."
What defines "the welfare
of mankind" in the mind of an MK Ultra proponent should give one
In preparation for the "post-industrial order" that was unleashed
with the 1971 floating of the US dollar and the destruction of the
Bretton Woods monetary system, that at least included a modicum of
regulation of the monetarist speculators, Lamontagne prescribed that
the "new wisdom" no longer aim at discoveries in atomic, medical and
space sciences, in order to focus on more "practical" engineering
He also proposed that
funding to advanced science be diminished by widening the definition
of "science" itself to embrace the humanities, monetary economics
and social sciences.
Those programs then began
absorbing the funding that had formerly been directed to research on
Lamontagne stated this in
volume one of his Report:
"The new wisdom
prescribes that the additional R&D effort be devoted to the life
sciences and social sciences rather than the physical sciences…
to economic and social objectives rather than curiosity and
In Defense of
One leading Canadian scientist took an early stand against this Club
of Rome-driven transformation.
professor of environmental science at Dalhousie University and
Canadian Civil Servant wrote his 1973 book "The
Chaining of Prometheus: The Evolution of a Power Structure for
Canadian Science", where he identified Lamontagne as a
minion of the god Zeus as portrayed in Aeschylus' famous drama
The ancient Greek drama
told the story of the demi-god Prometheus who was punished for 10
thousand years for the defiant act of teaching humanity how to use
the Fire which Zeus had monopolized for himself.
Attacking the call to deconstruct the entire 1938-1971 science
funding structure and rebuild it under a new technocratic regime,
Professor Hayes said that the main problem with the Lamontagne
approach was called the Egyptian Syndrome:
"if only we could
destroy all that the Israelis have built up and reduce Palestine
to a desert everyone would be equal and we could start to build
a better world for the Arabs.
Thus Lamontagne wants
to destroy the National Research Council, the body that has
nurtured and launched much of the government research and got
the graduate programs going in our universities.
It is a fault of the
Trudeau administration which Lamontagne echoes."
Hayes attacked the
newly-formed powers of the Treasury Board which were now given
exceptional control of science policy under a new scientific
dictatorship when he said,
"the most subtle
exercise of power, which obviates the necessity of close
control, is infiltration by reliable people- the creation of a
became known the world over as the rulers of the British Empire…
With somewhat similar
aims, the Public Service Commission is grooming future Canadian
government managers to follow the general policies and precepts
of the Treasury Board."
There Are No
Limits To Growth
Ten years after the publication of the Limits to Growth,
American presidential candidate and founder of the
Fusion Energy Foundation Lyndon
LaRouche (1922-2019) responded to the neo-Malthusian movement in
more forceful terms than Dr. Hayes.
Writing his 1982 "There
are no Limits to Growth" as an early publication of the
Club of Life, LaRouche wrote:
"It is not the growth
of industry which destroys the world's forests. In most cases,
the cause is a lack of industrial output, a lack of good
industrial management of the ecosphere.
Over the past fifteen
years, the greatest single cause for destruction of the world's
"ecology" has been the toleration of the policies demanded by
the so called "ecologists," the so-called "neo-Malthusians" of
the Club of Rome, of the International Institute for Applied
Systems Analysis (IIASA), of the World Wildlife Fund, the Aspen
Institute, the Ford Foundation, the ‘Rockefeller Foundation, the
U.S. Sierra Club, and so forth and so on.
We are not putting
enough industrially-produced energy, in the form of water
management, chemicals, and so forth, into the farming of the
At the same time, we
are using biomass for fuel and other "traditional" uses, in
cases we should be using nuclear-generated energy supplies, and
using modern, industrially produced materials in place of timber
for housing and so forth".
extraordinary influence which the Limits to Growth had on
consolidating the neo-Malthusian revival as a dominant factor in
western policy circles, LaRouche identified the core fallacies which
are only now being properly challenged by the efforts of President
Trump in America.
"The study itself
[Limits to Growth] was most conspicuously fraudulent on two
First, in attempting
to prove that industrial society was using up its remaining
natural resources very rapidly, Meadows and Forrester greatly
understated the known quantities of such resources.
important, Meadows and Forrester projected the rate of
consumption of natural resources by using systems of
simultaneous linear equations.
The very use of such
linear equations for a computer 'model' of that sort, builds
into the computer projections the assumption that absolutely no
technological progress is occurring in society.
technological progress, including fundamental redefinitions of
what 'natural resources' means, has been the outstanding feature
of European civilization for five hundred years.
The Limits to Growth
depended upon the assumption that such technological progress
had come to a sudden, absolute stop."
Just like Thomas Malthus centuries earlier, the neo-Malthusians had
to deny the existence of technological progress (and its origins in
human creative reason) as the means by which humanity's carrying
capacity is changed according to discoveries and inventions.
This fact of humanity's
relationship with the universe absolutely defines our existence as a
species above all other creatures of the biosphere.
As the "carrying
capacities" of other species are defined by the environment and
genetic characteristics, humans uniquely can transcend those
conditions willfully on the condition that we are given access to
the best cultural and educational heritage of the past with the
inspiration and curiosity to carry that heritage to ever higher
limits without ever expecting to reach a "mathematical equilibrium"
or "entropic heat death" as so many statisticians from the Limits to
Growth school pessimistically presume.
In opposition to this school, LaRouche's discoveries in the science
of physical economy (made during a period of 1952-1956) were
premised on the opposing concept that mankind's ability to leap from
lower to higher forms of energy consumption (i.e.: wood burning, to
coal to oil to nuclear fission to fusion etc.) allows for the upward
transformation of humanity's physical economic potential without
Creative leaps into
the unknown drive new discoveries of principles which allow for
humanity's potential relative population density to increase with
increased standards of living, life expectancies and cognitive
potential in ways that no other animal (which the Malthusians wish
us to presume we are) can achieve.
This fact of life is the
essential proof that not only mankind but the universe is unbounded
in its potential for constant self-perfectibility and thus
ANTI-ENTROPIC in its essence.
The BRI and
the REAL New Deal
I hope that this report has demonstrated that the
Green New Deal is nothing other
than a new form of eugenics masquerading as a socially conscious
reform of the system.
The fact is that not only
is this Green New Deal NOT green (as a world
covered by solar panels would increase desertification of the earth
through heating), but has no connection to the true New Deal.
The effects of a program
that seeks to reduce global CO2 emissions to "acceptable
levels" in accord with the will of today's British Empire would
bring nothing more than chaos, famine and depopulation to humanity.
Luckily, today's world carries nearly 8 billion souls and (barring a
few stubborn oligarchs and technocrats) - all of whom have minds
that could be willfully perfected and deployed to make great
discoveries in science and the arts.
The world in which these
people live is increasingly being shaped by a REAL New Deal under
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
which now has more than 160 countries on board and is the size of 20
This initiative requires
a return to an ethic founded upon a love of mankind
and belief in scientific and technological progress.
This spirit was expressed
beautifully by President Xi Jinping who
said on May 15 at the
Dialogue of Asian Civilizations:
"For a civilization
to endure, efforts must be made to keep it alive and build on
its heritage from one generation to the next. More importantly,
a civilization needs to adapt itself to the changing times and
break new ground.
The history of world
civilizations tells us that every civilization needs to advance
with the times and take in the best of its age in order to
develop itself. We need to come up with new ideas to add impetus
and inspiration to the development of our civilizations.
With these efforts,
we will deliver achievements for our civilizations to transcend
time and space and have a lasting appeal.
To spur people's
innovation and creativity, the best way is to come into contact
with different civilizations, see the strengths of others and
draw upon them."
The fact that such
figures as Presidents Xi Jinping and Putin have
created an alliance based upon long term planning, great
infrastructure projects to uplift the conditions of life of everyone
and frontier technological progress indicates that the "great green
game" created in the wake of the assassinations of anti-Malthusian
leaders in the 1960s is finally coming to an end.
self-mutilation has finally a chance to heal with the first
anti-Malthusian President elected since the days of the
well-intentioned (though often dim-witted) Ronald Reagan over
35 years ago.
While Reagan did not have a Russia-China power alliance to cooperate
with during the Cold War, President Trump does.
The offer for America to
join the Belt and Road and new strategic operating system of
cooperation is on the table and awaiting an answer.
Trump will respond remains to