by Dr. Joseph Mercola
March 22, 2023
from
Mercola Website
Story at-a-glance
-
Over the past three months, a small group of independent
journalists, including Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, have
sifted through Elon Musk's Twitter Files, exposing the many ways in
which social media platforms have censored Americans at the behest
of the U.S. government, and spread fabricated propaganda intended to
"debunk" truthful stories
-
March 9, 2023, Shellenberger and Taibbi testified before Congress,
explaining how "a highly organized network of U.S. government
agencies and government contractors has been creating
blacklists and pressuring social media companies to
censor Americans"
-
A long list of government agencies has special departments or teams
whose duty it is to manage public censorship, in direct violation of
the U.S. Constitution
-
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security justifies censorship by
placing "misinformation" on par with a "cyberattack" on critical
infrastructure, which makes it a threat to national security
-
Congress must immediately defund and dismantle the
censorship-industrial complex in its entirety
Over the past three months, a small group of independent
journalists, including Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, have
sifted through Elon Musk's Twitter Files (video
at bottom page), exposing the many ways in
which social media platforms have censored Americans at the behest
of the U.S. government, and spread fabricated propaganda intended to
"debunk" truthful stories.
March 9, 2023, Shellenberger and Taibbi testified before Congress,
explaining how,
"a highly organized network of U.S. government
agencies and government contractors has been creating blacklists and
pressuring social media companies to censor Americans." 1
To say that
their findings are shocking would be an understatement.
As it turns out, a long list of government agencies has special
departments or teams whose duty it is to manage public censorship,
in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, which they swore an
oath to uphold.
In short, there's a secret "censorship-industrial
complex" in the U.S., to use Shellenberger's term, and they are
actively engaged in all-out information warfare against the American
public.
Shellenberger and Taibbi are now calling on Congress to defund and
dismantle this censorship-industrial complex in its entirety, and to
do so immediately. We cannot afford to let this treasonous cancer to
grow any further.
If we do not put a permanent end to it now, we
will lose this republic and all the freedoms we've enjoyed under it.
Shellenberger's Testimony to Congress
Shellenberger's testimony before Congress is 68 pages long, so I
cannot review all the details here.
You can
download and/or
read it on his Substack. 2
Here's an excerpt from his opening remarks:
"The Twitter Files, state attorneys general lawsuits, and
investigative reporters have revealed a large and growing network of
government agencies, academic institutions, and nongovernmental
organizations that are actively censoring American citizens, often
without their knowledge, on a range of issues, including on the
origins of
COVID,
COVID vaccines, emails relating
to
Hunter Biden's business dealings,
climate change, renewable
energy, fossil fuels, and many other issues...
'If government officials are directing or facilitating such
censorship,' notes George Washington University law professor
Jonathan Turley, 'it raises serious First Amendment questions.
It is
axiomatic that the government cannot do indirectly what it is
prohibited from doing directly.'
Moreover, we know that the U.S. government has funded organizations
that pressure advertisers to boycott news media organizations and
social media platforms ,
a) refuse to censor
and/or
b) spread
disinformation, including alleged conspiracy theories...
The Stanford Internet Observatory, the University of Washington, the
Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, and Graphika all
have inadequately disclosed ties to the Department of Defense, the
C.I.A., and other intelligence agencies.
They work with multiple
U.S. government agencies to institutionalize censorship research and
advocacy within dozens of other universities and think tanks.
It is important to understand how these groups function... they are
creating blacklists of disfavored people and then pressuring,
cajoling, and demanding that social media platforms censor, de-amplify,
and even ban the people on these blacklists...
These organizations and others are also running their own influence
operations, often under the guise of 'fact-checking'...
In many instances,
censorship, such as labeling social media posts, is part of the
influence operation aimed at discrediting factual information...
Importantly, the bar for bringing in military-grade government
monitoring and speech-countering techniques has moved from
'countering terrorism' to 'countering extremism' to countering
simple misinformation.
The government no longer needs a predicate of calling you a
terrorist or extremist to deploy government resources to counter
your political activity.
The only predicate it needs is simply the
assertion that the opinion you expressed on social media is wrong."
Disinformation Superspreaders
Shallenberger's full testimony reviews the roles of key
organizations and individuals within the government's censorship
network and provides specific examples disinformation campaigns
created and propagated by this network, including,
-
the Trump-Russian
collusion conspiracy theory
-
the delegitimization of the COVID lab
leak theory
-
the Hunter Biden
laptop conspiracy theory...
In the case of the
Hunter Biden laptop, the FBI initiated the plot
to quench the story.
In collaboration with Twitter,
Facebook and the
Aspen Institute, the FBI held a tabletop exercise to practice the
shaping of the media's coverage of a potential "hack and dump"
operation involving Hunter Biden material, 3,4 several weeks before
the New York Post broke the story (which was subsequently censored
everywhere).
Shallenberger also details how
Renee DiResta, who is part of the
Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) - the nongovernmental side of
the censorship network - helped derail Republican Senate candidate
Roy Moore's campaign in 2017 by launching thousands of fake bots
against him on Facebook and Twitter. 5
DiResta is now a research manager and top lieutenant at the Stanford
Internet Observatory, where she's directly connected to the
Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) censorship
directorate.
She's also a member of the
Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR), 6 the goal of which is to bring about a
totalitarian
One World Government. 7
DiResta's work
history also includes a stint of unknown duration with the CIA.
8
While CISA, which is a sub-department of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), was originally tasked with defending the U.S.
against foreign cybersecurity threats, it quickly morphed into,
a
government entity focused almost solely on domestic censorship...
Chris Krebs, who oversaw CISA's transformation, was fired by
President Donald Trump in mid-November 2020.
Krebs then formed the
cyber consulting firm Krebs Stamos Group together with Alex Stamos,
director of the Stanford Internet Observatory and former chief of
security at Facebook.
Krebs and Stamos are also leaders at the Aspen
Institute, which was part of the FBI's exercise to train social
media on how to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story...
Why Democrats Demand Censorship
In a more recent Substack article, 9 Shellenberger shares his
thoughts on why the Democratic Party are so supportive of and
insistent on censorship.
He believes it was triggered by,
"two
seismic challenges to the postwar liberal order of 2016:
"The two events
shocked and frightened national security leaders on both sides
of the Atlantic.
Many openly said that
the political threat to NATO and the Western Alliance was bigger
than any security threat, a conclusion dramatically reinforced
by the election of Trump in 2016, who had repeatedly criticized
NATO and hinted at withdrawing the U.S. from it...
Elites spent the following six years reacting to this blow to their
control over the media discourse and, thus, their ability to
manufacture consent.
In January 2017, The Department of Homeland
Security DHS quietly expanded its mission from cybersecurity to
cybercensorship by arguing that 'misinformation' is a 'cyberattack'
on US critical infrastructure.
On January 6th, 2017, in his final act as Director of DHS,
Jeh
Johnson declared elections 'critical infrastructure.'
The concept of
critical infrastructure went from physical things like satellites
and dams and federal buildings to events like elections or public
health campaigns."
So, the DHS basically justified censorship by,
placing
"misinformation" on par with a "cyberattack" on critical
infrastructure, which makes it a threat to national security...
Shallenberger goes on to review the unique role of
the EIP, which
consists of the,
-
Stanford Internet Observatory
-
Washington
University's Center for an Informed Public
-
The Atlantic
Council's Digital Forensics Research Lab
-
Graphika...
The EIP and CISA entered into a formal partnership to censor
election misinformation in late June 2020, and as explained by EIP
leader Stamos himself, the purpose of the partnership was to do the
censoring that the U.S. government could not do due to lack of legal
authority.
Ever since then, the EIP has acted as a bridge between government
and social media platforms, monitoring and instructing social media
on what to remove on the government's behalf.
When censorship of COVID
information first became apparent, I warned that it wouldn't
stop there, and it hasn't.
Denying 'manmade climate' change is now
an 'offense' that will get you axed, and as reported by Shellenberger,
10 CISA in June 2022,
"announced that it would also
demand censorship of information relating to the financial world."
Domestic Censorship Superweapons
We cannot wait until the day when merely stating the obvious - that
we're in a recession - will get you booted off social media.
CISA
and all other government departments and teams engaged in censorship
must be defunded and abolished.
We must also open up a conversation about the use of artificial
intelligence and quantum technologies to improve and automate
censorship capabilities, because that's precisely what the National
Science Foundation (NSF) is doing - and this work is being funded by
the U.S. government.
As reported by the Foundation for Freedom
Online: 11
"In the promo video below, National Science Foundation (NSF) grant
project WiseDex explains how the federal government is funding it to
provide social media platforms with 'fast, comprehensive and
consistent' censorship solutions.
WiseDex builds sprawling databases of banned keywords and factual
claims to sell to companies like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.
It
then integrates this banned-claims databases into censorship
algorithms, so that 'harmful misinformation stops reaching big
audiences'...
And the Biden Administration, via the NSF, is providing
start-up capital for tech tools to get social media platforms to
censor more aggressively."
'Course Correct'
- Another Censorship Superweapon
Another NSF censorship superweapon under development is called
Course Correct...
According to the promo video (above), they are:
"… building the core
machine learning data science and artificial intelligence
technology to identify misinformation, using logistics, network
science, and temporal behavior, so that we can very accurately
identify what misinformation, where misinformation is spreading,
who is consuming the misinformation, and what is the reach of
the misinformation...
Course Correct has pioneered experimental evidence showing that the
strategic placement of corrective information in social media
networks can reduce misinformation flow...
Course Correct can tell
journalists the most effective ways to correct misinformation in the
actual networks where the misinformation is doing the most damage."
Basically, what they've discovered is that the most effective way to
shut down an undesirable counter-narrative is to strike it down when
it first appears.
If the first instance is deleted, then the idea
can't "gain legs."
This means that the primary "enemies of the state" are
thought-leaders, people who share ideas, positions or viewpoints
that differ from the official narrative.
Without doubt, I'm already
on that list, and unless Congress takes swift action to rein in this
madness, things are only going to get more dangerous from here.
And, as disturbing as all of that is already, WiseDex and Course
Correct are just two of about a dozen or so censorship tools being
developed by the NSF with government funding!
Military-Grade Information Weapons Are Being Deployed
By now, it ought to be apparent that our government is at war, and
the enemy is we the people.
The fact that it's an information war
doesn't make it any less serious.
As reported by Foundation for
Freedom Online: 12
"One of the most disturbing aspects of the [NSF's] Convergence
Accelerator Track F domestic censorship projects is how similar they
are to military-grade social media network censorship and monitoring
tools developed by the Pentagon for the counterinsurgency and
counterterrorism contexts abroad."
The mere fact that the government is developing and deploying
military-grade censorship and propaganda weapons at us - the very
people paying their salaries with our hard-earned tax dollars - is
telling and does absolutely nothing to instill trust.
Government Decommissions FOIA Website
Eroding public trust even more, the federal government recently
announced it will decommission FOIAonline as of September 30, 2023.
13
This is the website where all
Freedom of Information Act
responses were made available to the public.
Now, the only way you can view the documents a government agency has
released in response to a previous FOIA request is by re-requesting
them for yourself, which can be both time-consuming and costly, or
somehow obtaining them from the original requester, if you know who
they are.
Thought Police Ties to Big Pharma and DOD
As of September 2021, the U.S. Department of Defense has also paid
NewsGuard $749,387 to censor and suppress conservative media, 14 a
fact that again highlights the military nature of all this
censorship.
NewsGuard, which claims to rate news websites for reliability,
accuracy and trustworthiness, was founded in 2018 with seed money
from the
Publicis Groupe, one of the largest PR companies in the
world that services several of the largest drug companies on the
planet.
As noted by The Gateway Pundit:
15
"NewsGuard has consistently attacked
The Gateway Pundit on,
COVID,
the Hunter Biden laptop, and vaccines that have all been proven to
be accurate...
NewsGuard has NEVER criticized the
mainstream media for
lying about,
Trump-Russia collusion, the Hunter Biden laptop, COVID
and vaccines.
So why is the federal government funding this radical
censorship outfit?"
Needless to say, I've been a constant target of NewsGuard, whose
so-called "fact-checkers" can't seem to get their facts straight no
matter how many references you give them. Nor do they have the
expertise to evaluate the evidence.
Here is the
latest exchange my team had with John Gregory, a "health
editor" at NewsGuard.
He contacted us March 9, 2023, saying they
were updating their existing review of Mercola.com content and had
questions about our editorial practices.
The exchange starts at the
bottom, so you'll have to read it from bottom-up.
Twitter Files Have Opened a Can That Cannot Be Closed
The Twitter Files have really opened a huge window into the U.S.
government's illegal censorship of American citizens, and the extent
of this censorship network is far greater than anyone previously
suspected.
Is this really the government we want?
Should the DOD be
allowed to use military-grade social engineering and propaganda
tools against the American public?
Congress must immediately
defund and dismantle
the
censorship-industrial complex
in its entirety...
I, for one second Shellenberger's statement to Congress: 16
"Congress should immediately cut off funding to the censors and
investigate their activities.
Second, it should mandate instant
reporting of all conversations between social media executives,
government employees, and contractors concerning content moderation.
Third, Congress should limit the broad permission given to social
media platforms to censor, deplatform, and spread propaganda."
The government censorship machine must be dismantled, now,
before
it's too late...
Video
Twitter Files on Trial
Sources and References
1, 2, 16 Michael
Shellenberger Substack March 9, 2023
3 Twitter
Michael Shellenberger December 19, 2022
4 Coffee
& Covid December 20, 2022
5 Foundation
for Freedom Online November 9, 2022
6, 7 Wakeup-World
August 31, 2016
8 Foundation
for Freedom Online March 9, 2023
9 Michael
Shellenberger Substack March 13, 2023
10 Twitter
Michael Shellenberger March 13, 2023
11, 12 Foundation
for Freedom Online January 29, 2023
13 Twitter
Joseph Mercola March 12, 2023
14, 15 Gateway
Pundit March 9, 2023
|