|
by Justus R. Hope, MD
December 20,
2021
Updated Mar 14, 2022
from
TheDesertReview Website
International Court of Justice
Don't fall for propaganda stating that Gates, Fauci or
Daszak are just normal people doing 'benevolent work' for
the world.
Legal challenges are being brought all over the world
that they have crossed the rubicon into the darkness of
'crimes against humanity.'
On the other hand, remember that the International Court
of Justice is the principal judicial organ of
the United
Nations, so,
it isn't too likely that it will prosecute
co-conspirators of other U.N. agencies such as the Word
Health Organization (WHO)...
Source
In a stunning
46-page legal filing to the International
Criminal Court on December 6, an intrepid attorney and
seven applicants accused
...and twelve others of
numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code.
These included various
crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome
Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.
Besides the four kingpins, twelve others were named,
including the CEOs of the leading vaccine corporations and the
health leaders held accountable for the United Kingdom:
-
Albert Bourla,
CEO of
Pfizer
-
Stephane Bancel,
CEO of Moderna
-
Pascal Soriot,
CEO of Astra Zeneca
-
Alex Gorsky, CEO
of Johnson and Johnson
-
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus,
Director-General of the WHO
-
Boris Johnson, UK
Prime Minister
-
Christopher
Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser
-
Matthew Hancock,
former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
-
Sajid Javid,
current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
-
June Raine, UK
Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
-
Dr. Rajiv Shah,
President of the
Rockefeller Foundation
-
Klaus Schwab, President of
the World Economic Forum
Dr. Rajiv Shah,
having worked for the Gates Foundation since 2001, was named a World
Economic Forum "Young Global Leader" in 2007.
He now presides over
the Rockefeller Foundation, a group funding ID2020 along with the
Gates Foundation.
Klaus Schwab, a wickedly intelligent, perhaps diabolical
German with double doctorate degrees in Economics and Engineering,
is the founder of the
World Economic Forum, a club for the
wealthiest percentile of the world's corporate and political elite.
He is a power broker who
has groomed many presidents, prime ministers, and tech CEOs who now
view him with reverence and unswerving loyalty.
Schwab, an economist, and technocrat has befriended many nations,
most significantly China's Xi Jinping, who delivered a key
speech at Davos.
He praised his vision of
a
New World Order.
On January 25, 2021,
Klaus Schwab vowed his
support for Xi Jinping with these words,
"Mr. President (Xi
Jinping) I believe this is the best time to reset our policies
and to work, jointly, for a peaceful and prosperous world.
We all welcome now,
his Excellency, Xi Jinping, President of the People's Republic
of China."
See mark 2:26:
Many consider Schwab the mastermind behind the current movement
towards,
...to be run jointly, in totalitarian fashion,
with China.
Attorney Hannah Rose and seven applicants,
brought the Nuremberg
action on behalf of the victims, the entire population of the
United Kingdom.
She filed the legal
proceeding with the International Criminal Court located at The
Hague.
The Hague is notable for
its long history in helping victims seek redress for war crimes and
defining appropriate ethical guidelines for conduct during war.
Following the Nazi atrocities committed during World
War II, the war crime trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany.
Following these, a set of principles was developed, which ultimately
led to the development of the
Nuremberg Code.
These principles essentially meant that anyone, no matter how
wealthy or powerful, even a head of state, was not above the law.
The fact that the law of their home nation would permit their action
would not relieve the person from justice under international law.
In particular,
the medical experiments conducted by the
Nazi doctors,
...led to strict rules and ethical principles regarding future human
scientific trials, including the doctrine of necessary informed
consent and freedom from coercion or threat in submitting to
experimental drugs.
As we all know, before receiving a surgical procedure, there is a
legal and ethical requirement that the patient be apprised of any
significant potential risks, including infection, bleeding, nerve
damage, or even death.
The patient usually signs
the consent form following this explanation.
And as we all know,
whenever we receive prescription medication, we are notified of the
potential risks on a package insert and usually a discussion with
the Pharmacist.
The vaccines should be no different, yet they are.
A person about to receive
the jab (for
Covid-19) is rarely told that there are risks of,
blood clots,
bleeding, cerebral thrombosis, myocarditis, and death,
...yet those
risks exist.
See mark 12:58 to 17:40
at below video...
Video
|
