|
by Alexander Dugin
May 27, 2025
from
AlexanderDugin Website
Spanish version
Alexander Dugin traces
how Donald
Trump's return to power
marks a
decisive rupture
with the
global Deep State,
fracturing
the collective West
and
hastening the rise of a multipolar world
as liberal
globalism begins to collapse...
With the arrival of
Donald Trump
and his team in the White House, the entire architecture
of international relations began to shift - radically so.
One of the most important developments in
this new global picture is the accelerated fragmentation
of the West.
Much has been said and written about it, yet this
phenomenon still lacks a thorough geopolitical and ideological
analysis.
First and foremost,
the split of the West is ideological in
nature. Geopolitical aspects are secondary.
The point is that Trump and his supporters - who
won the U.S. election in the fall of 2024 - are radical opponents of
liberal globalism. And this is not a passing or partisan issue.
It is a serious and principled matter.
The current head of the White House bases his
entire ideology, policy, and strategy on,
the central thesis that the left-liberal
ideology, which dominated the West (and indeed the world at
large) for several decades - especially after the collapse of
the Warsaw Pact and the USSR - has completely exhausted its
potential.
It failed in its mission of global
leadership, undermined the sovereignty of the United States (the
primary engine and general staff of globalization), and now must
be decisively and irreversibly rejected.
Unlike the classical Republicans of recent
decades (such as
George W. Bush), Trump never
intended to,
adjust globalism in the neoconservative
style, which called for direct aggressive imperialism to spread
democracy and enforce unipolarity.
Instead, not merely opposing Democrats in policy
detail, Trump seeks to cancel liberal globalization altogether in
all its dimensions, offering his own vision of global order.
Whether he can implement this vision remains an
open question:
resistance to Trump's policies grows daily.
But the president's stance is serious, and his
popular support is substantial - enough, at the very least, to try.
And Trump is trying.
Trumpism - at least in theory and in the hopes of its most committed
adherents - systematically and consistently rejects global
left-liberalism.
In that ideology, the subject of historical
progress is all of humanity, to be united under a World
Government (composed of liberals).
This requires strengthening the global hegemony
of Western democracies through a unipolar model, and once all
opponents,
Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and
hesitant actors,
...are defeated and dismembered, transitioning to
a world without poles.
Nation-states are to gradually cede authority to a supranational
body - the
World Government - which would not
simply represent a
Deep State, but a global
Deep State
This entity already exists in practice, operating
via a networked model:
its agents and supporters are present in
nearly every society, often in key positions in politics,
economics, business, education, science, culture, and finance.
In essence,
today's international elite - predominantly
liberal, regardless of national affiliation - forms the
infrastructure that sustains this globalist project.
Liberal ideology promotes extreme individualism, denying all
forms of collective identity - ethnic, religious, national,
gender - and even the very category of humanity, as reflected in
the agendas of transhumanists and deep ecology proponents.
Thus the promotion of,
...is integral to liberal ideology.
In place of nations and peoples, it sees only
quantitative aggregates.
Meanwhile,
the liberal international elite is becoming
increasingly intolerant of any criticism.
Hence, they aggressively push methods of
totalitarian social control - even to the point of creating a
biological profile of every individual, stored in Big Data.
Under the banner of "freedom," liberals are
effectively establishing an Orwellian-style dictatorship.
This ideology - and the global institutions it has spawned, both
legal and clandestine - have dominated the U.S., the West, and the
world at large until Trump's rise.
Exceptions include,
-
Russia
-
China
-
Iran
-
North Korea,
...and to some extent,
...and other countries that have chosen to
preserve and strengthen their sovereignty despite pressure from
globalist forces.
The core conflict thus unfolded between liberal
globalists on one side and countries oriented toward multipolarity
on the other.
This opposition reached its sharpest expression
in
the Ukraine conflict, where a
Nazi regime in Kiev ,
was deliberately created, armed, and
supported by liberal globalists to inflict "strategic defeat" on
Russia, which represents an alternative pole to the unipolar
world order.
In Islamic countries, the same purpose is
served by radical Islamist forces like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and their
affiliates.
In essence, the puppet globalist political
regime in Taiwan falls into the same category.
In general, this entire system - before Trump -
was known as the "collective West."
In that configuration, the positions of
individual countries and national governments played little
role.
The global Deep State had its own programs,
goals, and strategies, which completely ignored national
interests.
This included the U.S. itself:
liberal globalists from the Democratic
Party pursued their policies without regard for the
interests of ordinary Americans.
Hence the,
-
the rise in social inequality
-
the extreme gender experiments
-
the flooding of the U.S. with illegal
immigrants
-
the outsourcing of
-
the collapse of the healthcare system
-
the failure of education
-
the spike in crime,
...and so on.
All of this was deemed secondary compared to the
global dominance of liberal elites, who were steering humanity
toward 'political singularity' - that is, a universal leap
into a new, post-human future where technology would replace people
entirely.
Of course, countries of the Global South passively resisted, and
Russia's active promotion of a multipolar world posed an existential
challenge to liberal globalism
But the collective West continued to act in
concert and even succeeded in rallying around itself,
if not the majority of humanity, then a
significant portion...
Naturally, the problems of global dominance began
to accumulate.
Experts foresaw eventual confrontations, but the
liberal plan remained unchanged. The world seemed on course for a
global order dominated by the collective West:
an ecosystem of liberal elites and obedient,
zombified masses.
New technologies enabled ever greater control
through total surveillance and even biological intervention into
individuals' physiology (via
bioweapons,
vaccinations, and
nano-chipping).
The collective West continued on this path until
the very last moment - and would have remained on it had 'the
global Deep State's candidate,'
Kamala Harris, won the U.S.
election.
But something went wrong, and Trump
won.
He is not their pawn.
In fact, Trump's agenda is the polar opposite
of the liberal-globalist program.
Trump's initial stance was
directed against the Deep State,
at first, specifically within the U.S.,
against the Democratic Party elite and the ecosystem globalists
had built over decades of uncontested rule.
Their networks had permeated everything:
For many years, the U.S. was the stronghold of
the collective West, and American influence in Europe and worldwide
was synonymous with liberalism and globalism.
Trump declared war on precisely this.
His administration's first steps targeted the
dismantling of the Deep State.
-
The establishment of DOGE under Elon
Musk
-
The closure of USAID
-
Radical reforms in education and
healthcare
-
The appointment of loyal Trumpist
ideologues (Vance, Hegseth, Patel, Gabbard, Bondi, Savino,
Homan, Kennedy Jr.) to key positions in government, the
Pentagon, and the intelligence community,
...were political-ideological operations against
liberalism.
On his first day in office, Trump issued an executive order,
canceling gender policy, woke ideology, and
the DEI principle (diversity, equity, inclusion).
He immediately began fighting illegal
immigration, crime, and the unimpeded penetration of Mexican drug
cartels into U.S. territory.
In effect, Trump began wrenching the U.S. out of the collective
West's system, dismantling the structures of the global Deep State,
and tearing apart the networked ecosystem built by liberals over
decades.
At first, he did so openly and decisively.
Elon Musk, via his platform X, assumed the
role of anti-Soros
and actively supported right-populist forces in Europe and
Africa, directly opposing the globalists.
Antiglobalists also received backing from
Trump's ideologue Steve Bannon and Vice President J.D.
Vance.
Accordingly, Trump's geopolitics are entirely
different from that of the globalists.
He rejects liberal internationalism, demands
a realist approach to international relations, and proclaims the
supreme goal as U.S. national sovereignty as a great power.
He refuses to accept any argument favoring
global liberalism at the expense of American interests.
He tightens immigration policy to the
extreme, strives to bring critical manufacturing back to the
U.S., aims to rehabilitate the financial system, and focuses
strategic interests close to home - namely Canada,
Greenland, and security along the southern border with
Mexico.
In this broader context, we must understand the
war in Ukraine.
For Trump - as he has repeatedly stated - this is
not his war. It was prepared, provoked, and then waged by the global
Deep State (i.e., the collective West).
As president, Trump inherited it, but,
since his ideology, policy, and strategy
run nearly entirely contrary to those of the globalists, he
wants to end the war as quickly as possible.
It is not merely someone else's war:
it is the antithesis of his own program...
He is far more concerned with China than with
Russia, which poses no real threat to U.S. national interests.
We should now recognize that Trump's reforms
are immense in scale.
He is fundamentally reshaping the global
order.
In place of a unified collective West, two actors
now emerge:
The global Deep State still rules the EU,
and the liberal ecosystem remains deeply entrenched within the U.S.
itself.
Thus, Trump is not just splitting America from
the collective West - he is carrying out a revolutionary
transformation of his country. Despite popular support and allies in
key positions, he faces a deeply rooted globalist infrastructure
built over nearly a century.
The first steps toward a liberal-globalist U.S. foreign policy were
taken by Woodrow Wilson after World War One. Since then -
with some deviations - that approach has dominated.
Trump is determined,
to abandon it in favor of classical realism,
unyielding national sovereignty, and a recognition of a
multipolar world in which other great powers exist alongside the
U.S. - powers that need not be liberal democracies.
He categorically rejects the idea of
abolishing nation-states in favor of a world government.
As for gender policy, migrant worship, cancel
culture, and the legalization of perversions - Trump finds all
of it openly repulsive, and says so.
What conclusion can we draw from this overview?
First of all:
the split of the collective West is well
underway.
A once-unified liberal-globalist system with
planetary reach (which, even in Russia, had deeply penetrated
the highest levels of power in the late 1980s and 1990s, almost
dominating until Putin's arrival) is giving way to a
new world order that more
closely resembles multipolarity.
This shift aligns with Russia's short- and
long-term interests.
The crisis and likely collapse of the
liberal-globalist project and weakening of the global Deep State are
to Russia's advantage.
That is, in fact, what we are fighting for:
a world in which Russia is a great sovereign
power - an actor, not a pawn.
The gravity and depth of global changes following
Trump's return to power are extremely significant. While these
developments may not be irreversible, everything Trump has done, is
doing, and likely will do in dismantling the collective West
objectively contributes to the rise of
multipolarity.
However, the forces of resistance must not be
underestimated.
The global Deep State is powerful, deeply
entrenched, and strategically fortified.
It would be reckless to dismiss it.
These structures still control the main
European powers and the EU itself.
They are extremely strong in the U.S., and it
was the global Deep State that created modern Nazi Ukraine as a
terrorist entity.
That is whom we are truly fighting - not the
West, not the U.S. As soon as leadership in Washington changed, the
entire picture shifted.
Yet the global Deep State - no longer reducible
to the U.S., CIA, Pentagon, or Wall Street - still exists and still
pursues its global agenda.
It is highly likely - indeed almost certain -
that agents of the Deep State will attempt to influence Trump, steer
him toward fatal mistakes, sabotage his initiatives, or even
eliminate him altogether. Such attempts, as we know, have already
been made.
That is why today, more than ever, we must engage in serious,
rigorous study of what we are truly facing in the form of liberal
democracy.
its theories, values, programs, goals,
strategies, and institutions.
This is not as easy as it sounds:
until recently, we ourselves were under its
dominant influence, and in some ways, perhaps still are.
Until we fully understand the true nature of
our enemy, we have little chance of defeating it.
In Ukraine, we are not fighting Ukrainians, not
the U.S., and not even the collapsing collective West.
The nature of our enemy is something else
entirely.
The only task remaining is to determine what it
is...
|
