| 
			  
			  
			
			
  THE ANOMALIST - 1
 Summer 1994
 
			from
			
			Scribd Website 
				
				For the most part 
				
				Mario Pazzaglini 
			walks confidently through life.    
				As a clinical psychologist with a 
			private practice in Newark, Delaware for the past 22 years he is 
			certainly on firm footing. During this time he has also been a 
			clinical instructor at the Jefferson Medical School. And at times he 
			has been on the adjunct faculty of the department of psychology at 
			the University of
 Delaware. But sometimes, by his own admission, Pazzaglini tip-toes 
			through territory most would consider "unacceptable." One such area 
			is "alien writing."
   
				His interest in the subject dates back more than 
			a decade. During this time he has collected samples of writing which 
			people claim to have obtained from alien sources by various means. 
			In 1991 he took a first stab at organizing this often vague, very 
			complex, and always controversial material in a book called 
				"Symbolic Messages - An Introduction to a Study of Alien 
				Writing."   
				This privately published volume is both an introduction to 
			the study of writing and other symbolic systems, and a look at how 
			"alien writing" fits into the subject. He also presents these found 
			alien symbols as a model for attempting to understand alien 
			intelligence itself.  
				  
				Pazzaglini has also treaded cautiously through 
			the subject of street drugs.    
				Since about 1967 he has done 
			ethnographic studies on neighborhoods and the kinds of drugs they 
			use and has traveled all over the world in the process. He is now 
			putting together a book on the subject. Its glossary contains 
			entries for about a thousand different street drugs. His interest in 
			the subject stems from a fascination with images - the same subject 
			that eventually led him to study "alien writing." 
				   
				In 1969 Pazzaglini 
			ran one of the drug clinics at Woodstock.Patrick Huyghe
 
			  
 
			
 
			  
			  
				
				How did you come to be interested 
				in "alien writing"?
 Pazzaglini: I can trace it to my basic interest in internal 
				representation. Out of that grew my interest in images. Out of 
				that grew my interest in symbols. And out of that grew my 
				interest in different forms of writing, in other words, how 
				ideas were put down in symbols. Alien writing is a subgroup of 
				that last interest.
 
				  
				I've been doing work on images since about 
				1965, but this particular collection started about 10 years ago.
 The subject sort of appeared as a question in my head. I was 
				reading some 
				
				books on UFOs and wondered about the whole issue of 
				physical traces. Work had been done on marks on the ground, UFO 
				nests, and such. A couple of articles and books mentioned that 
				there was writing and symbols and I was curious as to what they 
				would look like.
 
				  
				So I wrote to these people and began asking 
				them for samples and that sort of took off.
 
				Where did most of your samples come from exactly?
 
 Pazzaglini: There were three main sources. One source was 
				directly from the people, the people who feel that they are 
				
				contactees or those who feel that they are abductees. I've also 
				gotten some from various UFO authors; 
				
				Budd Hopkins looked at 
				what I have and he agrees that some samples look similar to what 
				he has collected.
 
				  
				My third source was a large stroke of luck; I 
				got them from the estates of 
				
				George Williamson and
				
				George Adamski.  
				  
				These are interesting for me, because these people were 
				part of the contactee movement in the early 50s late 40s, before 
				the field was, in a sense, contaminated.
 I also knew from my other work that there were systems in 
				history like this, such as the one produced by Dr. 
				
				John Dee, the 
				court astrologer to Elizabeth the First, and Edward Kelley. The 
				story goes that a spirit appeared to them, a being of light, who 
				dictated to them an entire system. I have a copy of this 
				manuscript.
 
				  
				It's a language, an alphabet, and an entire magical 
				system.  
				  
				This system was then used at the end of the 19th century 
				by 
				
				McGregor Mathers in formulating 
				the Golden Dawn and the other 
				organizations that grew out of that body of knowledge. That 
				system is known as Enochian and is still in use by various 
				magical and ritual groups. And there are other systems like 
				that.  
				  
				The writing on the golden plates of the 
				
				Mormon Church is 
				another example.    
				There is a whole history of such 
				material. 
				 
				Sample from a 
				1987 abductee.  
				Too small a 
				sample to work with, but belongs to the dot and line category of 
				scripts.  
				Usually these are 
				alphabetical scripts.  
				(All examples 
				from Mario Pazzaglini's Symbolic Messages.) 
				
 How far back does this history go?
 
 Pazzaglini: There are traditions in Egypt concerning the 
				god 
				Thoth, who supposedly devised writing and gave the symbols to 
				the people. Other examples includes Oannes, a half-man, 
				half-fish who did the same job for 
				
				Sumeria as Thoth did for 
				Egypt.
 
				  
				Then there's 
				
				Dogon who did it for the Philistines and 
				Quetzalcoatl who did it for the people of Central America. In 
				fact, I went to Mexico because I heard rumors of a cave at 
				Juxlahuaca in the state of Guerrero where there are frescoes 
				dating from a thousand to five hundred BC in age. And reportedly 
				there was a picture of a feathered serpent giving a symbol to an 
				Indian.  
				  
				So I went there, and after an incredibly hideous day, 
				made it into this cave and there it was. I'm not making many 
				conclusions out of this, but there is a very strong mythological 
				structure throughout the world of people coming from someplace 
				else and handing symbols to people.  
				  
				The history is in our 
				mythology, too, because Moses got the 
				
				Ten Commandment written on 
				tablets by the hand 
				of God.
 
				What was the script of the Ten Commandments?
 
 Pazzaglini: No one knows what these symbols looked like but they 
				were clearly thought to be extraterrestrial in origin. The 
				earliest version we have is in ancient Hebrew, which, in 
				historical terms, is a rather recent development.
 
				  
				So it 
				certainly wasn't in that script.
 
				I see in your book that some samples are copies of symbols 
				that people remembered seeing on a craft. Others came from a 
				piece of paper or a book they were handed by the aliens.
 
 Pazzaglini: Anything you can think of I have an example of. In 
				other words, there are people who copied symbols directly off of 
				objects and this is what they are giving me.
 
				  
				There are people 
				who are given books, like 
				Betty Andreasson.  
				  
				They have the book 
				for awhile, and sometimes they can copy down what they saw, or 
				they sort of get the gift of being able to receive more script 
				by telepathic means.
 
				Channeling?
 
 Pazzaglini: Yes, though I've scrupulously avoided that term all 
				through the book at the expense of an awkwardness in language. 
				It's such an overused word.
 
				  
				But yes, at one extreme are people 
				who just channel writing.
 
				How many examples of alien script have you collected in the 
				past decade?
 
 Pazzaglini: I probably have nearly a hundred. What's interesting 
				is that if you talk to people about the verbal content of their 
				channeled writing and ask them to send you a sample and use it 
				for publishing purposes, they are usually pretty happy to go 
				ahead and do that.
 
				  
				But the symbols people hold very close to 
				themselves, for whatever reason. They seem to be more personal. 
				So I've had a hard time obtaining permission to use symbols of 
				the people who received them. Then there are the researchers who 
				collect this kind of material but who refuse to show them to 
				others so as not to contaminate the field.  
				  
				I can understand that 
				because the field is so incredibly confounded already. 
				 
				Example of a cursive script from a 1992 Contactee. 
				 
				"I received 
				this in my mind after my first contact" (CE II ). 
				"It's both 
				technical and religious... how to manipulate minerals and 
				light."   
				Does any sample stand out as particularly bizarre?
 
 Pazzaglini: There's one I received recently. The writing 
				appeared on lumber and I saw the boards.
 
				  
				I'd really have a hard 
				time believing this if it hadn't come from such a credible 
				person, a person working at a lumber supply yard, who gets 
				injured because these boards fall on his head. And on these 
				boards are all sorts of symbols. Is there a wood burning set in 
				the sky? I don't know.  
				  
				He's baffled and scared and doesn't want 
				to talk about it much anymore.
 
				And you don't find these people psychopathological?
 
 Pazzaglini: No. And if I can brag a little bit, I know. Because 
				I've dealt with all sorts of pathology and he was dead normal. 
				That's one of the questions in my head all the time. It's not 
				that I would exclude someone who is psychotic. But I certainly 
				want to know that.
 
				  
				Or if they are multiple personality, which 
				would be even more to the point, I'd want to know that. He 
				showed no signs of psychopathology, nor did his family make any 
				complaints that would indicate any kind of pathology. Then 
				there's the fact that he wants to push it away, which is fairly 
				normal, and not talk about.  
				  
				It just doesn't fit into his life. 
				In general almost none of the people submitting samples has any 
				significant psychopathology.
 
				How about hoaxing?
 
 Pazzaglini: There is a lot of that. And it's of two kinds.
 
				  
				There 
				is unconscious hoaxing and conscious hoaxing. I have a few which 
				I've been able to trace down myself because I'm lucky that my 
				first interest is in writing itself. I have a large library on 
				writing and symbol systems. So if I receive a sample I can go 
				look for it, and I know the library well enough to usually find 
				it, if the writing has been copied. In a few instances I have 
				found exact copies of rather obscure languages.  
				  
				They're not 
				always incredibly obscure. One turned out to be from the Book of 
				Mormon. But few Mormons would even recognize it, as only two to 
				five percent of them have actually seen the script. It's like 
				the number of people who have actually read the Bible. Another 
				sample turned out to be from the 
				
				Phaistos Disk.* 
				  
				[* Found in Crete 
				in 1908, this artifact has been dated as no later than 1700 BC. 
				The 242 signs impressed on both sides of the disc remain undeciphered, as they bear no resemblance to the ancient 
				pictorial script of Crete or to any other hieroglyphic form of 
				writing.]  
				  
				That's fairly obvious conscious hoaxing.
 
				What are some of the features of genuine "alien writing"?
 
 Pazzaglini: I started at the other end of that question and did 
				a study to see what the features would be of blatantly made-up 
				writing.
 
 
				Yes, you ran an experiment on that. Tell us about it.
 
 Pazzaglini: I've done this a few times actually. I take a group 
				of people and give them simple instructions.
 
				  
				Because in my 
				scientific framework there is one set of rules, but if I broaden 
				it slightly I'd have to control for 
				
				ESP and such, which in terms 
				of an experimental paradigm gets fairly crazy quite soon. So 
				I've kept it simple. What I've done in these pilot studies is 
				take a bunch of people, put them in a relaxed state, and asked 
				them to imagine what an alien alphabet might look like.  
				  
				I ask 
				them to get a picture of that in their heads and, when it forms, 
				to write it down. 
				 
				"Angelic-music" 
				writing from circa 1944-45, done at that time by a 
				child 4-5 years old. 
				"They gave it to 
				me; it just came into my head." 
 
				You asked for an alphabet rather than a script?
   
				Pazzaglini: I said alphabet because 
				I wanted to control for whether they produced an alphabet, or a 
				syllabic system, or a pictographic system. But a handful of 
				people didn't follow the directions and produced systems that 
				actually were not alphabets.  
				  
				And believe it or not, some of them 
				then refused to give me permission to write them down, because 
				they said that they had actually gotten them from alien beings!
 
				Really? How many examples like that did you get?
 
 Pazzaglini: About 5 out of maybe 50 people, which is a pretty 
				high percentage, however this group may not have represented the 
				average population. And later on other people came to use the 
				process, incorporating it into their own method of adjustment to 
				life and coping. They would turn to whatever source that was and 
				ask it questions; should I do this or should I do that?
 
				  
				A 
				handful of these people have almost totally integrated that 
				process into how they function. That's pretty weird, but it's 
				not unknown.
 So anyway, the characteristics of the blatantly made up 
				alphabets - whatever that means now because the definition has 
				become a little shaky here  - are that people seem to be limited 
				in how they think about making up symbols. They tend to either 
				regress into scribbles, or into shapes you would expect like 
				triangles, circles, and other sort of archetypal perceptual 
				forms.
 
				  
				They also tend to run out of flexibility and begin 
				repeating basic forms. That's clearly a characteristic of a made 
				up alphabet.  
				  
				Then, when I broadened it and told them not to make 
				up an alphabet but to make up an alien symbol system for 
				representing thoughts, most people produced alphabets 
				anyway, many of which resembled the English alphabet.
 
				So now what are the characteristics of those you consider 
				possibly genuine?
 
 Pazzaglini: First you need a large sample to even begin to make 
				that kind of judgment.
 
				  
				One sample I have is about 500 pages and 
				it meets the first characteristic, which is that it should have 
				a limited number of symbols. This one has about 60 symbols, 
				which means it's most likely a syllabic system. The second 
				characteristic is that the symbols must be repeated throughout 
				the text. And in this sample things repeat in different 
				contexts.  
				  
				So this begins to look like a language with the 
				characteristics of having a sound representational system, some 
				sort of definition into words or thoughts, whatever they may be, 
				and a grammar, meaning that there are repeating patterns.
 
				Who produced these 500 pages?
 
 Pazzaglini: It comes from a well-known 
				
				abductee whose name would 
				prefer not to mention. Her material looks very much like those 
				from two other abductees who also have had really complex 
				experiences. The writing looks like Greg shorthand.
 
				  
				But unlike 
				shorthand its structure appears syllabic, like the structure of 
				Sanskrit or Tibetan. In syllabic systems about 60 different 
				symbols are involved and each one represents at least one 
				consonant and one vowel. English, to put this in perspective, is 
				an alphabetic system, which involves less than half as many 
				symbols and where each one equals a single letter.
 Now I have other items that look really alien, but I may only 
				have 10 to 12 symbols so they're hard to judge. I just got one 
				from Poland, for instance, that's very much like this abductee's 
				but you have to sharpen up all the curves, you have to sort of 
				geometrize this abductee's alphabet.
 
				  
				It's another fairly complex 
				system with about 68 separate symbols.  
				  
				So it falls within the 
				same framework.
 
				How many types of alien writing have you found?
 
 Pazzaglini: In the book I show three types, a geometric type, a 
				dot-and-line type, and a script-like or cursive form. Now I have 
				another one, which comes from a crashed-saucer witness, and he 
				produced symbols for me that he remembered seeing on the pieces 
				as a child. What's interesting there is that what he retrieves 
				consciously is better than what he retrieves hypnotically.
 
				  
				I 
				don't have any other samples that look like his, so in that 
				sense, it's truly alien. It looks like nothing else.
 
				After eliminating the hoaxes and those without enough 
				material, how many promising samples are you left with?
 
 Pazzaglini: About a handful. Out of those three share some 
				symbols, but then it's like comparing your handwriting and my 
				handwriting and someone's printing.
 
				  
				If you were totally 
				unfamiliar with the language and if the language was more 
				complex than ours, it would be pretty hard to tell if its the 
				same thing.
 
				What are those symbols on the cover of Symbolic Messages?
 
 Pazzaglini: Those two symbols come from a 3-to-5 year-old boy. 
				They are his "lead symbols." In other words, he looks at those 
				symbols to get back into the mode of pulling more of the writing 
				out of him.
 
				  
				What's interesting is that he produced page after 
				page of this stuff between 1943 and 1945. And luckily his 
				parents saved some of it. Turns out it looks like a known 
				alphabet from late Middle Ages, about 14th to 15th century. It 
				looks exactly like what's called the Celestial Alphabet, a 
				ritual alphabet very similar to Enochian in function.  
				  
				Whether 
				that's a coincidence, God only knows.
 
				How could theories of unconscious processing explain alien 
				writing? How could it be "psychological noise," in other words?
 
 Pazzaglini: I studied with Roberto Assagioli in Italy and he was 
				a friend of Jung's. As part of his theoretical framework, he 
				believed that people had subpersonalities that could act fairly 
				autonomously at times.
 
				  
				These personalities or complexes had 
				access to neurological and psychological processes that we don't 
				have direct access to, except perhaps in some sort of creative 
				state. So in his therapeutic process, a system called psychosynthesis, you actively invoke various pieces of a 
				personality (subpersonalities) and reintegrate them into a 
				person's functioning.
 It's possible to do this. I've done it and I've taught people to 
				do it. It's essentially the same as teaching people to channel. 
				First you get people into an image and you treat pieces of that 
				image as a representation of a certain subpersonality.
 
				  
				Then you 
				name it and form a relationship with it by talking to it, saying 
				"thank you for being here" and such, and eventually you can get 
				it to do tricks. And one of the tricks they will do is to 
				produce alphabets. They'll do anything that you want them to do.  
				  
				Now whether those things become operational, or mean anything in 
				the real world, is another whole story.
 
				Did your clinical practice have any influence on your alien 
				writing work?
 
 Pazzaglini: Yes. One of the sources for the interest is that 
				I've always worked with really ill people, with extremely 
				psychotic patients. And in my career there have been about a 
				handful of patients where I felt like something was going on 
				that we just don't understand at all.
 
				  
				Three quick examples.  
				  
				I 
				had a 16-year-old boy from downstate Delaware who was Amish. He 
				came in writing in a totally alien script. This is 1968 and I 
				didn't even know the concept then. But because I was curious I 
				searched and searched and finally found the script and it 
				happened to be one of the magical medieval scripts.  
				  
				Now again, 
				how that gets explained, I have no idea; he had no previous 
				contact with this material.
 I had another kid, also 16, an LSD user, and the language in 
				which he spoke was Old High German. Now how he figured his way 
				to Old High German, God only knows, but he did. He didn't speak 
				it well, but he did give me real words. My third example came 
				from a woman who was found on the street preaching, but no one 
				could understand her because she was speaking a language that 
				was really an amalgam of Latin, Greek, and, I think, Slovanic.
 
				  
				After I got her to write it down and looked at it, I began to 
				make some sense out of it. Now the content of it was a bit like 
				a science fiction blurb, but it was interesting.  
				  
				She had only 
				gone through the eight grade; she knew none of the languages she 
				used but of course pieces of Latin and Greek are buried in our 
				own language.
 
				These appear to be more suggestive of reincarnation rather 
				than alien writing.
 
 Pazzaglini: I've thought about that, but if I added 
				reincarnation to the mix also, I'd be utterly lost. So I've 
				tried to keep my official thinking on the subject as simple as 
				possible. But I should add this footnote: I studied with Tibetan 
				lamas for about 20 years because I wanted to understand how 
				other cultures have thought about how the human head works 
				inside.
 
				  
				They have a tradition called 
				
				Termas. These are what they 
				call Found Teachings. And these can be found in people's heads, 
				in other words, people will have a dream and write down a 
				teaching in maybe a foreign language, or maybe a ritual form of 
				Tibetan, or maybe a totally alien script.  
				  
				What I'm saying is 
				that they consider the phenomenon to be separate from the issue 
				of reincarnation, except that some of the "beings" that have 
				gone on and who stay near the Earth as protectors will sometimes 
				act as transmitting entities. That was interesting to me, 
				because I wondered about that question, too.  
				  
				Here was a culture 
				that believes in reincarnation, but did not use that explanation 
				for those kinds of teachings.
 
				Do you know of others who have collected this kind of 
				material?
 
 Pazzaglini: Obviously Adamski and Williamson did. They collected 
				these writings from all over the place. The oldest example 
				Williamson had was from 1937, from pre-flying saucer days, in 
				other words.
 
				  
				But the story involved a craft that landed in a 
				field. When the farmer went out, they handed him a piece of 
				paper and there were symbols on it. And I have that drawing by 
				the original person. It's really a nice piece. There are a 
				couple of the older UFO organizations that have files with this 
				kind of material. But it's rare, actually. And for some reason 
				people haven't been very interested in it.  
				  
				I would think it's a 
				nice piece of evidence and, if nothing else, a fairly startling 
				phenomenon.
 
				You make the argument that the study of alien symbols and 
				scripts might be a useful way of studying alien intelligence.
 
 Pazzaglini: Yes, because the assumptions are - and they are both 
				staggering - either that alien intelligence grows out of similar 
				biology or that it's totally different and then we probably 
				can't even think about it because we are fairly circuit bound.
 
				  
				I 
				can make up a lot of good stories about what that intelligence 
				might be like. But there's one type of writing that's very 
				interesting and there are actually systems like this on Earth. 
				That's where the act of writing the symbols themselves actually 
				constellates the neurocircuitry in such a way that the brain 
				becomes receptive to the patterns being drawn and the meanings 
				that they contain at that particular moment.  
				  
				That's a real 
				interesting concept and very different than the system of 
				writing we are accustomed to seeing.
 
				Is it like an automatic translation then?
 
 Pazzaglini: Yes, it's like a recording. That's very much like a 
				sigil. Certain sigils were meant to act that way. In other 
				words, if you take your finger and trace over the sigil it 
				produces a concomitant psychological and physiological change 
				within the person.
 
				  
				In fact, in biology there are systems like 
				that; they are called 
				
				entrainment systems.
 What's entrainment?
 
				  
				When you and I stand in front of each other, 
				before we even talk, in the first few seconds as we look at each 
				other, we trade information; we interlock by means of our 
				perceptual systems. It's possible to make diagrams that do the 
				same thing, that "arrange" us perceptually. I've actually played 
				with this, I've made such diagrams.  
				  
				Certain kinds of diagrams 
				actually produce minute physiological and psychological changes 
				inside of people. Sometimes these are called sigils. In Eastern 
				iconography they are called yantras, or mandalas.  
				  
				That's what a 
				
				yantra is. A yantra organizes physiology so that psychological 
				processes of a certain nature can be evoked more easily.  
				  
				The 
				process of entrainment answers the question of why ducks don't 
				have sex with cows. And why ducks don't bump into each other. 
				There are innate wiring systems for perceptual recognition and 
				information transfer. It seems like a fairly important question. 
				People have dealt with the behavioral and social aspects of it, 
				but I'm really interested in the mechanics of how it happens. 
				 
				  
				The brain spends a lot of money, so to speak, developing those 
				systems. And so in evolution the development of these 
				entrainment systems has been very important. For the auditory 
				system, these were lateral line organs in fish, and those became 
				the inner ear and the auditory canal in primates, so the lateral 
				line-auditory-vestibular system has always been used as an 
				orienting sense.  
				  
				And of course, mantras, which are the auditory 
				equivalent of the yantra, operate on this system. They organize 
				physiology so certain psychological processes can take place 
				more easily. So I've done a lot of thinking about that. Some of 
				the weirder thinking I can't even put into words yet because 
				it's hard to conceive of how an alien organism would occupy this 
				kind of space and maneuver in it and not be of the same system 
				as we.  
				  
				And how would it communicate to us?  
				  
				One of the things the 
				UFO literature makes obvious is that aliens apparently can speak 
				the language of whatever country that they appear in, English in 
				America, Portuguese in Brazil, Spanish in Mexico. So are they 
				multi-lingual or do we receive in our own language or is it all 
				just in our heads - is outer space really inner space?  
				  
				That's a 
				piece of epistemology that you could set three philosophers on 
				for an awful long time.
 
				How about possible translations of the alien writing?
 
 Pazzaglini: The abductee who produced the 500 pages of material 
				was still in contact and the aliens seemed to be of a frame of 
				mind that they would answer questions. So I began to ask them 
				questions about how I might go about translating it. That 
				project is still in progress. I did one thing as an exercise.
 
				  
				After making certain assumptions - for instance, assuming that 
				it's a syllabic script, that the major symbols are consonants 
				and the minor symbols are vowels - I came out with a tentative 
				kind of transliterations and/or translations. But I'm so far 
				down the assumption line that I'm probably standing on gas. But 
				eventually I got one sentence to actually read out somewhat 
				logically if, in fact, it is a sentence.  
				  
				It said something like,  
					
					"In order to make light solid, show it to the moon."
					 
				I arrived 
				at that on my own. 
				  
				 But when I asked the abductee what this 
				passage was about she said it was about how to make light solid.
 
				So she has an idea what these things refer to.
 
 Pazzaglini: Oh, yes. There is another phenomenon here and that 
				is very often people who have this material will have a gut 
				feeling of what it's about although they can't translate it word 
				for word.
 
				  
				You can experience this yourself if you go into a 
				church where people speak in tongues. After you are sitting 
				there for awhile, although you don't understand a word they are 
				saying, you become sort of entrained to them and some of the 
				meaning begins to bleed through. I've done this.  
				  
				It's a great 
				experience.
 
				Have you ever talked about your collection of "alien writing" 
				samples to the highly controversial former Harvard University 
				marine biologist Barry Fell who claims that Old World writing 
				can be found throughout the Americas prior to 1492?
 
 Pazzaglini: Yes, I did show it to one of his "followers" and he 
				has no idea what it is. It looks like nothing he's ever since 
				and he's seen a lot.
 
				  
				I got a few of these samples in the 
				mid-1970s and though I hadn't done anything with them at the 
				time, I was every interested in what he was doing because I was 
				interested in languages. But what happens is if you take a 
				pencil and paper and scribble for 10,000 years you are bound to 
				repeat a few things. So you can look at pieces of alien writing 
				and say this looks like this and that looks like that.  
				  
				He had 
				seen one symbol before. It looks like a crescent with a line 
				through the middle. That appears in alien script after alien 
				script after alien script. It's a very stable element. Its also 
				common in the Middle Ages as a sign for different kinds of 
				alchemical processes. It looks like a backward "e."  
				  
				But as a 
				complete form, the alien writing did not seem familiar to him.
 
				Any final thoughts on the subject? Any way to ever hit 
				paydirt in this work?
 
 Pazzaglini: I try not to keep that framework in my head.
 
				  
				That will spoil it I think. I don't think I know enough to say 
				more. I can recognize some of the patterns now. I can recognize 
				if a script looks like another script. I can do a few simple 
				tricks. I'm going to continue collecting and I would like to get 
				a computer program so I can put all the symbols into a pattern 
				recognition system.  
				  
				But otherwise I try to keep away from what 
				one person calls "the lust of results."  
				  
				For me, premature belief 
				only destroys perception of the possible. Belief excludes and 
				it's too early to do this. I am not sure even if this is an 
				entirely external or internal phenomenon - or perhaps a mix.  
				  
				It 
				could be that we humans, as a group of beings, can elicit from 
				reality what only begins as our needs, thoughts, and wishes.  
					
						
						
						Could there be a psychoid element, as Jung puts it, that is able 
				to materialize what is internal? 
						
						Or are we really being spoken 
				to through the noise and chatter of this material? 
						
						Is this 
				something a process, purely within ourselves, or a complex 
				message system from the outside, from an unknown external 
				source?  
				I'm not sure.   
         
			Alien Writing
 
			from
			
			UFOMystic Website
   
			
			
			Part 1 
			January 09, 2007 
			In 1994, in the course of publishing my old zine, “The Excluded 
			Middle,” I read an interview in the first “Anomalist” magazine 
			(above report) with 
			a clinical psychologist who specialized in the study of purported 
			“alien writing,” that is symbols that human recipients claim are 
			products of a non-human source.
   
			This study was carried on without the 
			general knowledge of his colleagues, which he surmised might have 
			affected his private practice and his work with severe psychotics 
			and drug abuse cases.    
			Before I could find out how to get in 
			touch with him, he sent me a copy of his self-published book 
			"Symbolic Messages - An Introduction to a Study of Alien Writing" with a letter stating,  
				
				“I knew you needed to see it.” 
			Dr. Mario Pazzaglini was a 
			remarkable man, as I was to find out over the next few years until 
			his untimely death in 1999.    
			I only met him once, at the 1997 Roswell 
			bash. We eschewed the parades and some of the more boring lectures 
			one day and went thrift-store shopping. Most of our talks were over 
			the phone, and he actually provided some much-needed free therapy 
			when I mentioned some things that were going on in my life at the 
			time.
 In 1970, he was at the Woodstock music festival, helping to run the 
			“bad trip” tent along with a few Tibetan Buddhist friends when the 
			hippies couldn’t handle their acid.
   
			He had been a regular in the Washington 
			D.C. insider circuit for a few years in the mid-1960s, when he was 
			still in college majoring in physics and mathematics.  
				
				"He would have made a great 
				physicist" says his brother Peter.  
			In the late 1960s, he had changed his 
			mind and entered the graduate program in psychology.    
			He earned his doctorate from the 
			University of Delaware in 1969, and lived in the small town of 
			Newark, just a couple of miles from U.D. for the rest of his life.
 He later became an expert on the problems and cures of drug abuse, 
			serving on several committees and panels for the state of Delaware, 
			and in his psychiatric practice, specialized in treating the 
			severest of the mentally ill.
   
			Like everything else in the late '60s, 
			the field of psychology was undergoing an upheaval as newly-minted 
			doctors began to explore anything that would make the job of healing 
			faster and more rewarding for the patient.  
				
				"Western culture tries to keep 
				everything fragmented and separate, and one of the things all of 
				us were trying to do was introduce connectedness back into the 
				process" recalled Pazzaglini's longtime friend and psychiatric 
				practice partner Dr. Paul Poplosky.    
				"I think that's where some of his 
				other interests came into play." 
			Those "other interests" included a 
			cornucopia of esoterra; alchemy, cabbala, tarot, and a heaping dose 
			of numerology.    
			He also made enough of a splash through 
			well-concealed back channels that our buddies in the ubiquitous 
			black helicopters occasionally shadowed him. He compiled a magickal 
			and symbol system of his own devising which may never be cracked. In 
			short, he may very well have been a modern-day Magus in the guise of 
			a mild-mannered psychologist from Delaware.    
			This was his perspective when examining 
			the subject of UFOs. 
			
			 Self-portrait of Pazzaglini with “friends.”
 
 
			He attended a conference on UFO 
			abduction at M.I.T. in 1992 and presented his research to the 
			leaders in the field, but few of his friends ever knew about it. 
			Most of the leaders in the abduction field basically ignored the 
			subject. Almost no one knew he had notebooks filled with examples of 
			strange symbols.    
			Hundreds of his paintings and drawings 
			filled his home.  
				
				"I believe in his next life, he'll 
				be an artist" says his brother. 
			
 
 Part 2
 January 26, 2007
 
 Someone out there has been writing us letters for a long time.
   
			Strange symbols and printed languages 
			turn up regularly in UFO encounter experiences. Police officer
			
			Lonnie Zamora glimpsed a strange 
			crescent-and-arrow type design on the side of an egg-shaped craft at 
			Socorro, New Mexico in 1964.   
			The account of Jesse Marcel, 
			Jr. includes pieces of wreckage that his father, Major Jesse 
			Marcel, brought home to Roswell in the early morning hours of July 
			8, 1947 inscribed with symbolic writing that, if genuine, bears 
			little comparison to earthly communication. 
			
			 Jesse Marcel, Jr.’s drawing of Roswell wreckage symbols.
 
			"Alien writing" can literally change history.
   
			The
			
			Mormon faith is based on 
			translations of strangely engraved golden plates that founder 
			Joseph Smith claimed to have dug up after a divine visitation in 
			1823. As for the authenticity of "mentally received" messages, there 
			is reason to believe that at least some of the symbols and symbol 
			systems described do not originate from the psyche of the 
			participants.
 One of the difficulties in verifying the authenticity of an alien 
			script is that if it resembles an earthly language or known 
			terrestrial symbols, is it necessarily a "true" one?
   
			Perhaps the reason for this is that all 
			input into a human consciousness is filtered through an individual's 
			learning, experience, culture, and prejudice, and the messages must 
			necessarily be rendered in a form that is understandable to the 
			receiver as well as others. The flipside of this reasoning is the 
			obvious possibility that the receiver might be delusional, 
			hallucinating, or simply hoaxing the account.    
			While it takes little skill to devise an 
			alphabet with a one-to-one relationship to the experiencer's native 
			language, a representational pictorial symbol system or one with no 
			discernible grammar or syntax (at least one which seems to possess 
			an internal logic) is more difficult to fake.
 Humans receive alien writing in many ways.
   
			Some say that the symbols come from 
			"angels" or "teachers." By far the most common method of reception 
			is by "channeling," but the messages can also be the result of a 
			close encounter wherein the participant sees and remembers symbols 
			or languages shown to him while wandering about inside (or inside 
			what is perceived to be) an extraterrestrial craft.    
			An early example is the case of 
			Herbert Schirmer, who in 1967 claimed to have been taken aboard 
			a ship near Ashland, Nebraska. On the uniforms of the beings he 
			encountered was a symbol that resembled a winged serpent. This theme 
			is obviously not exclusively extraterrestrial, as it was known to 
			the Greeks and Romans, as "dragons" in Chinese and European lore, as 
			well as to the new world cultures of Central and South America.
			   
			There is the possibility that Schirmer 
			may have incorporated it (consciously or not) into his account. An 
			interesting sidelight is the fact that the Mayan culture held the 
			belief that 
			Quetzelcoatl, the feathered 
			serpent, had taught and bequeathed to man a system of pictorial 
			writing.
 Dr. Mario Pazzaglini made a 16 year study of examples and 
			possible sources of alien writing, and chronicled them in his book,
			Symbolic Messages.
   
			He collected hundreds of samples and 
			classified them into distinct categories:  
				
					
					
					Alphabetic: consisting of 20-30 
					symbols, where each symbol is a consonant or vowel
					
					Syllabic: usually 50-60 symbols, 
					where each symbol represents a consonant/vowel combination
					
					Ideographic: Usually 500-600 
					symbols, where each symbol represents an idea or word
					
					Symbols: Consisting of single 
					and complex insignia types.  
			These categories must necessarily derive 
			from a human understanding of representational visual systems, and 
			in fact most claimed alien writing examples fall into these 
			categories. 
			
			
			 aUI language taught to John 
			Weilgart (he claimed) by spacemen.
 
 
			Pazzaglini conducted a limited 
			experiment wherein participants were asked to conceive their own 
			"alien language."   
			The results without exception showed 
			that, left to their own devices, people tend to concoct alien 
			alphabets that bear a one-to-one relationship to their native 
			language.
 In the realm of the written word, one of the earliest concrete 
			examples of what was purported to be an extra-human communication 
			was channeled by medium Edward Kelley and his boss, 
			Elizabethan Court Astrologer and all-around magician 
			
			John Dee, from 1582 to 1589. Dee said that an "angel" 
			had dictated to him (through Kelley) a system of symbols to be used 
			in a ceremonial context, and would provide the user with a higher 
			understanding of magical and alchemical concepts than human-based 
			writing.
   
			The system was called "Enochian," and is 
			still in use by occult practitioners today. 
			
			 Enochian symbols.
 
 
			It communicates concepts through the 
			juxtaposition of symbols and their relationships to each other, and 
			does not appear to be derived from any written language. Enochian is 
			claimed among its adherents to affect the reader/user on important 
			subconscious levels as well.    
			This aspect of alien writing has also 
			been mentioned by UFO contactees and abductees. 
			
			
			 Alien writing channeled by Pazzaglini.
 
 
			Pazzaglini’s own alien writing doesn't 
			resemble anything else that UFO witnesses have reported, with one 
			exception.    
			There seems to be a spiritual, if not 
			graphic kinship with the scribblings of  
				Betty Andreasson 
			and her family, and this may explain the fascination he had with 
			this case.    
			Andreasson, whose abduction experiences 
			were chronicled in the Andreasson Affair books by Raymond Fowler, 
			has produced hundreds of pages of a cursive script that almost 
			defies analysis.    
			After comparing Andreasson's drawings to 
			various medieval alchemical symbols, Pazzaglini was able to 
			translate one possible sentence out of hundreds.    
			It read:  
				
				"If you want to make light solid, 
				show it to the moon." 
			While this probably makes little 
			practical sense, it does make for a beautiful sort of poetry.
 Pazzaglini once told me that he was in contact with leading 
			abduction researchers who promised to send him examples of alien 
			symbols, but he never got them. Perhaps it was because they wanted 
			to keep the symbols secret to verify the authenticity of future 
			claims, or maybe it was simply their egos getting in the way.
   
			Another study of alien writing has yet 
			to be published, which is unfortunate. Pazzaglini had to 
			self-publish his own monograph.    
			Admittedly, the study of alien 
			writing would make little sense to a publisher with an eye on 
			the bottom line, but as a contribution to an understanding of 
			extra-human experience, it should be welcomed. 
			  
			  
 
			  
			  
			  
			
 
 Asemic Texts = Alien Writing?
 by 
			
			Greg Bishop
 
			July 21, 2009 
			from
			
			UFOMystic Website 
			  
			My intention in this post is to examine 
			ideas and engage in a bit of freeform speculation, while not 
			claiming that any specific statement is “true.” 
			Yesterday, Mac Tonnies linked a site called The New Post 
			Literate from his blog that showcases and examines an art style 
			called “asemic writing.”
 
			 
			
			
			A Wiki entry describes the term: 
				
				Asemic writing is a wordless open 
				semantic form of writing. The word asemic means “having no 
				specific semantic content”. 
			Illegible, invented, or primal scripts 
			(cave paintings, doodles, children’s drawings, etc.) are all 
			influences upon asemic writing. But instead of being thought of as 
			mimicry of preliterate expression, asemic writing can be considered 
			as a post-literate style of writing that uses all forms of 
			creativity for inspiration.
 Some asemic writing has pictograms or ideograms, which suggest a 
			meaning through their shape. Other forms are shapeless and exist as 
			pure conception.
 
 Where does this put us with regard to supposed “alien” writing, 
			where the percipient almost always assumes that symbols witnessed do 
			have some “specific semantic content?”
 
			  
			Asemic writing (at least as it is 
			postulated by artists working in the genre and other interested 
			parties) may have no overt meaning, but the creators are apparently 
			trying to communicate something, even if it’s just the voice of 
			their subconscious bubbling up though the conscious mind, through 
			their hands, and onto the page, canvas, or computer screen. This is 
			one of the main ideas behind modern and post-modern abstract art.
			 
			  
			Artists use color, line, and shapes to 
			communicate or examine how we interpret and react to basic visual 
			inputs.
 Dr. Mario Pazzaglini’s rare book "Symbolic Messages - An 
			Introduction to a Study of Alien Writing" may be a fair commentary 
			on both Asemics and aliens. For many years, Pazzaglini worked with 
			people who either claimed physical or mental contact with ufonauts, 
			or had “channneled” messages and scripts from otherwise disembodied 
			sources.
 
			  
			Symbolic Messages is composed of 
			about half commentary written by Pazzaglini and page after page of 
			words in alien, angelic, occult, or apocryphal languages.
 Pazzaglini acknowledged that humans are perfectly capable of making 
			up their own inscrutable languages.
 
			  
			One of the best examples given is
			
			The Voynich Manuscript, a 
			handwritten book from the 15th or 16th century which has so far 
			eluded any efforts at decryption. 
			
			 
			
			
			Detail from Voynich 
			manuscript
 
			Looking at the illustrations in 
			Symbolic Messages, it is difficult to determine what is being 
			communicated, if anything, but one example, simply titled “A Cursive 
			Script, 1990″ was described as working on many levels other than 
			just simple information transmission from one mind to another.
 The graceful squiggles were described (by the recipient) to 
			Pazzaglini as attempting to communicate a message on several levels.
 
			  
			As he explains: 
				
				[this is] an interesting script 
				where it is conjectured that it represents a summary of: 
				 
					
					1. The internal state of the 
					sender  
					2. The intended internal state 
					of the receiver 
					3. The state of the relationship 
					4. The message itself 
				Therefore, there are no, strictly 
				speaking, repetitions of symbols but a line-symbol of 
				interrelated states and message. This is a good example of a 
				totally foreign (to us) kind of writing system; it would be 
				essentially untranslatable. 
			 
			He adds at the bottom of the page: 
				
				In another example of this type, a 
				symbol was “decoded” by tracing it out and thereby “receiving” a 
				message – ”like playing a record.” 
			Used in this way, written language may 
			be much like a living (although primitive) intelligence itself, 
			interpreting nuances of emotion and shades of meaning to communicate 
			much more than just a mere message.  
			  
			Strangely, this is also places it in the 
			same general category as the widely denounced 
			“Caret” 
			(Commercial Applications Research for Extra-terrestrial 
			Technology) symbols, touted by the anonymous source “Isaac” in 2007.
			 
			  
			The source claimed that the symbols 
			themselves were part of the design of an alien device, and activated 
			the mechanism on which it was printed, which he and a team of 
			researchers attempted to back-engineer in the 1970s. 
			
			 
			CARET symbols
 
			Could mere symbols be part of an 
			interface between a machine and its creator or user?  
			  
			This idea resembles (and in some ways 
			surpasses) the philosophy behind many occult writing systems, 
			particularly John Dee’s channeled language of “Enochian,” 
			as well as others like magical symbols called sigils and even 
			designs used in voodoo. The symbol itself and the act of writing it 
			is supposed to activate forces to be used by 
			
			the magician.
 This magical sigil, for example was created by an occultist for a 
			specific purpose which was described as,
 
				
				 
				…a means of exerting my will to 
				achieve a specific end (in this case, the return of stolen 
				property)… The idea is to turn conscious desires into 
				unconscious events, allowing that secret daemon inside our 
				skulls to affect reality on a subtle level and, presumably, 
				satisfy your encoded desire. 
			Are disembodied “aliens” using symbols 
			to exert their wills on unsuspecting
			
			UFO/abduction witnesses?  
			  
			It is an idea that has been suggested by 
			a few researchers. Witnesses have also claimed that “aliens” 
			interfaced with their craft and other devices on a deep mental 
			level.  
			  
			While in a hypnogogic state, I once 
			imagined endless columns of numbers that were somehow arranging to 
			plot against me! Maybe one of the asemic artists will wake up some 
			morning with a hulking “something” in their bedroom awaiting 
			instructions!  
			  
			More likely though, we are dealing with
			a phenomenon at the edge of our understanding which may be 
			one more key to a better examination of supposed non-human 
			intelligence, and one way that they may be sending us garbled 
			messages, or perhaps the “messages” are just etheric junk to 
			which we assign our own meanings without realizing it.  
			  
			William Burroughs said that, 
				
				“We may be tuning into a universal 
				message with faulty radios.”  
			At the very least, a better 
			comprehension of this phenomenon may also bring us a step closer to 
			an understanding of how our minds interpret symbolic input.
 
			P.S.: I am still 
			trying to get permission to reprint "Symbolic Messages," as well as 
			some of Pazzaglini’s examples of his own channeled writings as well 
			as those of others.
 
			    
           
			
			
			Video 
			Radio Interview to Dr. Mario Pazzaglini (extract) 
			- Infinity Factoryby Richard Metzger
 October 04, 2001
 
			from
			
			OldDisinfo Website
 Richard Metzger interviews the late Dr. Mario Pazzaglini, 
			the author of "Symbolic Messages - An Introduction to a Study of 
			Alien Writing".
 
 Dr. Pazzaglini was investigating the possibility of Alien writing by 
			studying hundreds of artifacts and interviewing individuals who 
			claimed to have been contacted by alien intelligences.
 
			  
			He presents a 
			very balanced, rational, and informed view about the escalating 
			reports of written communication alleged to have originated from 
			non-human sources.      
			
 
			  |