29 - The Notion of Physicality

For the most part, human science is framed in terms of objects, forces, and vectors. Such concepts date from the time of the Greeks.


More recently, quantum physics has teased such concepts into a new light:

  • all atomic particles are “thing less” and non-concrete

  • there’s a seeming “randomness” of motion among them (a definition that both defines and limits itself)

  • there’s sometimes a faster-than-light “quantum connectedness” between them

Weirder still, there are seemingly infinite energy fluctuations in quantum interactions.


In short, our science is essentially suspended in mid-step with one foot in a primitive past, the other just beginning to test the waters of a profoundly new paradigm.


Meanwhile, alien physics is framed in terms of effects, rather than forces. That may sound like a subtle difference, but it’s not. It’s a major re-framing that allows for greater flexibility and a subtle yet fateful blending of phenomena on a cosmic scale. Concepts that we take for granted (the seeming unity of an atomic particle, the ability to enumerate particles as though each is separately whole-numbered and individual, the solely forward flow of time) are not accepted by aliens.


Aliens begin from a different premise, a different set of assumptions.

For example, we humans have an essentially liquid sense of ourselves. We think of our bodies as substantial, composed of fluids and a solid bone structure. The fears and instincts that move us daily are framed in terms of such concepts:

burns, impacts, food energy, and contagion (sex is for physical pleasure but it’s also about continuity).

So, we talk about power (use of force to move objects), and possession (control of objects).

Aliens have a larger and more airy, community sense of themselves (more space than thing). They see themselves as being composed on a sub-quantum level where negative and alternative cycle resonance gently connects on a universal scale. Rather than think of themselves as objects made up of tiny systems of objects (atoms), they see themselves as being hyper-connected to larger universal cycles.


It’s a categorically smarter kind of concept, and it subsumes atomic chemistry. While humans think of themselves as solid, nothing is solid in the alien view. Nothing.

Instead, aliens define themselves in terms of finer, tighter networks - patterns of resonance among sub-quantum interactions. So they’re composed of fantastically more capable relationships, all of which connect on a larger scale that allows for shared community/communities of mind. It’s a much more civilized kind of identity, although it poses new challenges.


A more complex universe is within you, so you must learn to accord within a more complex universe. For aliens, evolution is in every term of the equation; it’s always part of their makeup.

Although there are obvious exceptions, less physically pretentious aliens’ lives are ordered in terms of:

  • equality (within a society, but not always between societies)

  • the integrity of global and larger ecosystems

  • cosmic connectedness (relations with other aliens, hyper-dimensional science, and a finite universal ecology)

I’ve heard and have been involved in many discussions about this with a variety of different aliens.


I’ve heard them compete in such terms re: who is more consistently so, and I’ve heard them quickly resolve disagreements in terms of the common striving. Such considerations are always extant - at times an alien may depart from equal connectedness yet must return to it in order to advance his or her awareness.


There’s almost always another, more evolved society that a given alien people strive to emulate, hence they must be co-homologous (shared and included) within higher order relationships like the universal ecology, larger understandings, and a greater, finer form of mind. It’s a remarkably peaceful basis.

While humans tend to see from their inside looking out, aliens try to see through themselves in a way that spans more deeply inward, which allows for a seemingly external remote-viewing of both their bodies and their individuality (via the larger social whole, or the universe). This occurs in telepathic interactions and in larger group consciousness.


To be able to do so, aliens take the more civilized step of fading themselves down, in a sense, in order to evacuate themselves into larger continuity (hyperspace).


Usually, the more largely they interact within a greater shared awareness, the more advanced and capable they are. This involves a kind of remote sensing and it models the universe as all-inclusive, as should be the awareness. A major part of this is possible only because of, and is mediated by, larger pre-existing intelligent relationships (this is most important).


Advanced aliens see through themselves and must continually re-examine or redefine certain basic assumptions.

At a minimum, aliens are more studied and scientific than we are. This requires self-control and social purpose. The problem, of course, is that some highly technological aliens aren’t so well versed and sensitive in terms of what we might call “the humanities.”


Among aliens, sentience is implicit in all shared consciousness, but a given regime can intrude on and color it, one way or another. Although their contacts may seem universal, a selective bias can distort their sense of community of mind. Rather than remain open to the larger, more advanced universe, a regime may frame social identity in terms of its own needs and preferences.


It may speak as though its citizens are all one singular entity, but the universe is actually more varied than that. It’s not all one singular condition, although hyper-advanced kind may favor a subtle shading of the notion.

This calls into question the very nature of an observation. No matter how smug and dogmatic a regime may be about the one-ness of its connection to the larger universe, if the regime has committed too many crimes it simply won’t connect in certain ways. The larger order of being may be different. Greater, more intelligent dimensions of consciousness can’t be reduced to those of the offenders.

Which brings us back to the notion of physicality. A human might ask, “What am I?” But an alien will ponder “how” he/she or they may be. It’s a more airy, expansive notion of ever-evolving relationships.


It isn’t so physical… Which begs the question:

Are we actually physical, or do we think we’re physical because that’s the limit of our concept and because we’re physically vulnerable?

We’ve heard aliens discuss such notions at intervals.


The thinking goes something like this: All aliens are both determined and defined by greater, universal quantities. So in the most advanced form, we interact universally, to some extent, and in our most valid, most capable identity, we’re a community of mind in hyperspace. Individual peculiarities aside, universally valid ideas are, or can be, perpetual. Reportedly, great effort goes into assuring sustainable re-cycling of the universe.


So, in a sense, even though we die, the greater validity, the best of our being, goes on and can conceivably cycle back into other being(s). For example, when we die, do we go to zero, or do we continue to resonate within finer, “less than zero” energy? At the very least, we condition subsequent lives. And the better part of us, an undying higher community of mind, is our striving, hence we must ever be mindful of such.

However, a basic question arises:

Do some beings exist in crude form because that was determined by their weakness and limitations in a previous time, or is that but an irony of complex and imperfect inter-relationships that allow for a renewed (seemingly physical) existence?

It’s probably safe to say that most aliens aren’t coldly and mechanically deterministic.


They certainly know about evolution and genetics, but sometimes we hear vague drift about how flawed identity essentially groups itself with other flawed identities (i.e. limited ideas). This occurs in conversations about how greater community of mind compares to relatively backward individuals or groups.


The logical response of some aliens is that none of us are complete without the larger whole. Instead, we’re all merely complementary of each other, or fractional in a mathematical sense, so none exist in complete isolation. The implicit assumption is that mind is more evolved and capable when we participate and understand shared community of mind in hyperspace.

So, where do conversations of this sort arise? In mixed interactions, here.


Human contact now involves a variety of observing alien populations. Given that we live near a large, open travel corridor that winds through the galaxy just beyond the edge of a Milky Way spiral arm that you see overhead in the night sky, there are various interested populations.


Recently evolved aliens (including humans) engage in discussions either with, or about older populations, and hyperversal aliens of varying duration participate and tend to dominate some discussions. For example, along with other humans I raise objections about IFSP intervention here. You can probably guess which hyperversals suggest that like identities fall in with similar others.


In part, it’s a rationalization of an off-world policy toward humans and other aliens. In part, it reflects a certain attitude. Meanwhile, a thoughtful, regenerative mind can always encompass greater consideration, but that requires humility. Ultimately, we’re all merely complimentary.

There’s another kind of conversation that goes on both between aliens and in their thoughts. It centers on the basic question of how a universe was/is derived and can even exist in a stable, orderly way. If it exists, as is obvious, then a basic corollary is that it must all integrate. In order to exist, there must be a larger conservation, checks and balances to prevent excess and violations of the larger ecology.


Many aliens expect you to have pondered how that can be done. They expect you to have thought about how the entire universe can seem to be both physical yet not made of solids. In other words, if you know that there must be conservation in all relationships of all sorts, then how do you both embody and accord with such? What are you doing to improve both yourself and your kind in that regard?

You will be tested in that regard, whether you realize it or not. We’re all transparent, in this sense. If you verge on alien science and seek to interact more largely, do you understand how it all derives, in the first place? It’s as though none of what you do is valid unless you both respect and seek finer integration with other beings and their needs, their basic premise.


If you disregard them entirely, then,

  • What happens if, being much more capable, they disregard you?

  • What are the consequences?

More specifically, alien science and the politics of their interactions point to a succession of universe cycles, an extended continuity.


We’ve heard hyper-advanced aliens’ statements on the subject. That, in turn, suggests that further categories of yet more advanced beings exist and pre-date us, so we must curtail our energy demands and allow for their Δt/alt t needs, even if such beings don’t immediately appear before us when we want them to.



  • How did they derive and what kinds of relationships can we expect to have developed among them?

  • Do we fit in without harming the basic ecology?

  • In other words, is it right to want to travel great distances and sample other aliens’ ways of life?

  • Or, as aliens in Summers’ books, The Allies of Humanity, reportedly suggest, should we seek larger understandings yet not physically travel in great numbers?

Given remote sensing in hyperspace, you don’t need to physically go there.


Meanwhile, you’re expected to know that the use of energy by any and all kinds must be monitored and kept within certain bounds. Any and every system can be clocked in this regard.

You can see how such considerations return to basic questions of humility, good science and larger consideration. Thoughts about the ultimate derivation of the universe take you through different cycles, in a sense, hopefully improving you each time you go there.


A further, related question arises.

Should all humans and aliens be encouraged toward such considerations, or should they be allowed to lapse and receive a deserved physical fate, if they fail to do so?

Some advanced aliens say that if we’re too far wrong, we shouldn’t know too much to begin with.


It’s a sensitive issue involving life, fate, and nearly Tao-like consequences of any behavior. It touches on the question of whether all people are compatible with community of mind. It frames the alien view of humankind.

The unifying premise for all aliens is beyond specious want and pretension. The two are immutable. To simply enjoy one’s small life, or family, is not enough. Both the distant past and the future were/are dominated by more advanced beings, so prevailing standards are clear. Although some populations will say it requires hard work and interventions, such beings only achieve a universal basis of knowledge, communications, and ecology through shared mutuality.


The most extensive interactions and capabilities are all-inclusive - they leap far out yet go deeply inward everywhere. Where, in such identity, is there room for hatred and impulses toward violence? We’re talking about actual, existing populations, not abstractions. For us, it’s like walking into a huge stadium where everyone already knows that.

Have no doubt: through basic, universal hyper-dynamics the most advanced premise can go anywhere and touch on anyone. So when you encounter the studied, expansive, and reserved perspective(s) of such aliens, remember: they must be clear and responsible yet abiding and tolerant of diversity in order to participate.

That raises questions about how aliens test and measure themselves re: their standards, social deviance, and acceptability. How do they all get along, and what do they live for? Are their social controls based on fear, or is it good science and mutually understood principle (the common sense of commonality)? We’ve seen how fear regimes arise when specious distortion leads to lack of proportionality.


The Verdant colonial scheme is but one example. Meanwhile, more humble, considerate aliens and some hyperversals more closely approximate the greater universal premise.

Back to our main question: Are we physical, or is the notion of physicality, itself, evolving? Quantum physics did away with the notion of concretes. Now we know that nothing is solid. Since 1928 we’ve known we’re composed of ever-fluctuating energy and elusive quantum packets. Some of it leaks out into space, ever moving and enigmatic. None of it is solidly physical. Instead, it’s mostly emptiness.

Once you understand that aliens see themselves as composed of finer sub-quantum fluctuations conditioned by a larger universal continuity, your concepts begin to seem less physical, although in some ways they’re still bounded and finite. Again, it’s a question of how much a person knows and understands. In a sense, we aren’t entirely “real” (point-singular, line numbered), yet we obviously exist.

Generally, the more advanced the aliens, the less concrete is their self-concept.


This is due to the humbling effect of large interactions and group identity, plus the need to reduce population number. Meanwhile, we see aliens with hyper-advanced technology who seem overly preoccupied with physical security (preventing unwanted snoops, averting primitive upstarts, and securing ideal surroundings). It’s a conundrum, especially when their hybrids try to divert you with low-order routines when you investigate them.

Some hyper-advanced aliens tell us to remember that even their kind is biological beings with physical needs, not merely spirits. They’ve cautioned us to be observant and scientific in this regard because first contact can deceive the most narcissistic and simple-minded among us. Predatory aliens know how to manipulate a young population.


They know corruption intimately - from their own experience. There are destabilization schemes by large trading collectives and other regimes, interventions in which vulnerable planets are driven to desperation, then takeover. They know an easy prospect when they see one.

Despite statements to the contrary, such doings are premised on very physical designs. Although aliens may say they intervene to secure the ecology and de-weaponize, they tend to seek control of resources. Aliens think in terms of sustainable resource use and the Δt/alt t ecology, while humans have been conditioned to think in terms of paper money and an externalized notion of “economy.”


It’s doubtful that money is used on alien planets because it can be counterfeited or hoarded then used disproportionately, which can quickly ruin a planet’s ecology.

Although some here can’t bring themselves to admit it, elite economics has failed on this planet. Unlike alien commonality, it doesn’t work for the common good; it doesn’t complete the circle. Instead, it propagates illusion and superficiality.


Self-interested sociopaths are promoted in government, where they promote cronies, resulting in extremes of crime and secrecy. It’s killing this planet.


The personal attributes that such people regard as strengths (greed, predation, and willingness to steal public resources) are seen as epic weakness on more advanced planets because such people can be compromised and bent to facilitate an alien takeover.


On alien planets, the end of inequality is a watershed event, starker than was the difference, here, between the Roman Empire and Christianity.

So, by prolonging a failed model of resource use and distribution, humans remain vulnerable to the physical predations of aliens. It’s a simple fact of life. We can be manipulated and thwarted via the corruption of a few dozen people! Small wonder that individuals who take hundreds or thousands of times more than the norm for themselves are the same people who work to keep news about aliens and alien science secret.


Meanwhile, the IFSP’s ability to manipulate conflict here is premised on secrecy, which helps Verdants gain a foothold. Various reports suggest that IFSP operatives’ strategy is to worsen economic and religious extremes, making it difficult for humans to even discuss alien science and politics. Instead, we see lies in major media and blanket dismissals of the entire subject - at the worst possible time in human history.

While some in government like to think they’re working on a defense against aliens, because of the Rockefeller coup of 1953 it’s actually a defense against non-IFSP aliens (our neighbors). The so-called “joint arrangement” with the gray alignment apparently continues, and no policy apparatus makes reliable distinctions between aliens because there is no public policy apparatus. Secrecy and compartmentalization thwart the very discussion of such issues.

It doesn’t take a genius to see where it’s all heading. As long as an infiltrated regime can threaten and de-stabilize our planet, we will fail to come together as we must in order to survive. Rather than make competent global accords, we’re saddled with a tiny, bizarrely compromised junta that will try to avert scientific news about the discovery of inhabited or habitable planets.


It’s far worse the Church censorship of Copernicus.

And when the IFSP’s direct operatives can no longer hide the facts, they’ll try to put out pre-packaged propaganda about how they succeeded in cutting a special deal with a distant alignment of aliens. Their problem, of course, is how to explain abductions, the kidnapping and permanent removal of thousands of humans for use in breeding a hybrid client regime, the forced use of unwilling humans as breeders, the infiltration of humankind to create and manipulate conflicts to the IFSP’s material advantage, and more.


It’s hard to see how humans would agree to that, which poses a yet greater danger.


The IFSP may assume that our opinions don’t matter because we can be riven and driven toward violence then fed superficial half-truths, step-by-step, until we’ve been “pacified,” as Summers’ books allege. In order to feed the Verdant empire and provide it with a trading base for resource grabs along this arm of the Milky Way galaxy, human freedoms would be ended.

Although the 20th century saw a decline of colonialism here, the Verdant empire was founded on such impulses - just before our Jurassic period. Again, it’s a very physical design. However, now that humans are aware of aliens, a window of opportunity may be closing for Verdants, assuming their interest here isn’t merely diplomatic.


Numerous non-IFSP aliens and my probing indicate that in order to maximize the IFSP’s chances here, IFSP operatives have accelerated their strategy of tensions. Now we see a recurrence of old colonial patterns (domination, subordination, and manipulated conflicts), which seem like a throwback to primitive times. In part, that’s due to a regressive lag in Verdant evolution, which has come to affect us directly.

When the Verdant regime was cobbled together, it also absorbed the accumulated corruption of thousands of different worlds. In other words, they aren’t innocent.


As is evidenced by Verdant excess, the ruin of the grays’ planet (an IFSP intervention), the grays’ inability to speak on major issues, and the actions of the IFSP’s direct operatives here, the IFSP isn’t held together by democracy and critique. Instead, it was pieced together through harsh manipulation. As Verdants admit, some target planets were killed by deliberate design. Then their resources were easy to take. Mindful of such disasters, we must ask whether specious rationalization has spoiled the judgment of some Verdants.


Even hyperversals admit that self-interest tends to underlie most physical designs on resources. In two-faced fashion, the IFSP has cut secret deals with humans guilty of crimes against humanity, while posing as though the IFSP is above such doings else-where.


Verdants want to be able to say they steered human elites toward transforming crisis, but now that IFSP operatives can be exposed with relative ease, Verdant prospects appear to be diminishing. Those 500 trillion Verdants living on 246,000 planets are a treaty and policy concern for Milky Way aliens. More evolved Milky Way aliens may want to approach us less aggressively so that we can learn by better example.


After all, they have to live with us forever. Meanwhile, Verdants dart in at the last moment and tentatively occupy a number of our surrounding star systems, where they reportedly bred hybrid enclaves to suit their design (the Nordics and Semitics of Altair, the Tall Whites, and gray hybrids who crashed at Roswell fit this pattern).

So-called Nordics and Semitics are human-looking aliens discussed by government whistleblower Dr. Michael Wolf and others. Wolf said Nordics (tall, often blonde aliens who look like humans) and Semitics (long-nosed aliens who look Semitic-human) are based on the fourth and fifth planets of a star called Altair, which is visible from our northern hemisphere.


However, Wolf said both groups were bred by another human-looking group from the Pleiades star cluster. In other words, they would all be related. Swiss contactee Billy Meier’s much-disputed contacts feature “Pleiadians,” although he now calls them Plejarans.

The problem with “Pleiadians” is two-fold.

  • One, contactees say the Pleiadians are enemies of the grays, yet that appears to be contradicted by reports that Pleiadians say they’re part of a “galactic federation,” which sounds exactly like the IFSP.

  • Secondly, the Pleiades star group (purported home of “the Pleiadians”) is only 100 million years old, so life couldn’t have evolved there yet (Earth is 4.5 billion years old).

Instead, the name of those human-looking aliens should reflect their origin, which certainly isn't the Pleiades. If US soldiers were to ride into Africa and say “we're from Africa because we have a base here,” no one would call them Africans.

Some abductees interviewed by David Jacobs say Nordics were involved in their abductions.


As Jacobs writes,

“the evidence clearly suggests that the Nordics are most probably adult hybrids of human/alien mating.”

(The Threat p. 93)

Abductees told Jacobs that Nordics have been seen wearing tight fitting, one-piece uniforms sometimes of a silvery color.


Brenda, who was interviewed by Budd Hopkins, said she was abducted and taken to a base where grays and Nordics worked side by side. At an MIT conference on abductions, researcher Jenny Randles said her research showed that in Britain 35% of abductions are by Nordics, 6% of abductions in the United States are by Nordics, and in Europe 25% are by Nordics. (C.D.B. Bryan p. 68)


In other words, evidence suggests that “Pleiadians” and Nordics are IFSP aliens.

There are further inconsistencies in “the Pleiadian” story. Given that aliens have diverse kinds of skin, eyes, and other features that derive from various evolutionary conditions, it’s unlikely that aliens who arrive here just happen to look like we do. So when aliens who look exactly like humans arrive and say they just happen to be based in our vicinity, something is wrong with their story.


The evidence suggests that humans were taken from our planet in order to create the Nordic, Semitic and “Pleiadian” contingents.


They appear to be props for the IFSP intervention, fallbacks to be used in a multi-pronged IFSP approach to humankind. Given that they look like we do, the IFSP would assume we might trust them. It appears to be another IFSP deception.

Tall White aliens look so much like humans that if they wear sunglasses, they can mix in a human crowd.


Charles Hall wrote that Tall Whites were allowed a base in Nevada in 1954, the year Eisenhower reportedly met with tall gray aliens. (Emenneger, Sandler 1974) Because the dates coincide and Tall Whites do secret deals with a black budget cabal, Michael Salla suggests that Tall Whites and tall grays may be related.


If that’s true, the fact that sharp-chinned, tall grays reportedly accompany and give orders to shorter grays would further suggest a Tall White-IFSP status.


The gray alignment has the strongest motives for having created Tall Whites. Tall Whites’ arrogance mirrors that of tall grays seen giving orders to short grays during abductions. The fact that Tall Whites treat humans like cattle and try to train humans to be fearful and submissive further suggests that Tall Whites are a creation of the gray alignment.

There’s evidence to suggest that Tall Whites and other hybrids are fed selective versions of IFSP propaganda. As airman Charles Hall wrote in his first book, a Tall White alien doctor was astounded to learn that humans actually feel love. Apparently, the Tall White doctor was told otherwise. In other words, the IFSP may have provided Tall Whites with anti-human dogma that makes it easier for Tall Whites to kill troublesome humans, as Hall and other witnesses say they have.


In a 2007 interview, Hall said a Tall White female asked him,

“Do you understand that we love our children more than humans love their children?”

(Hall quote from Sweeps Fox show 11-07)

At various junctures, non-IFSP aliens here have said that Tall Whites are an IFSP dependency.


This is alarming news because it would mean that back in 1954 Tall Whites were allowed a base next to an Air Force base in Indian Springs, NV under false pretenses (they pretended to be anti-gray). One year earlier, US presidents had been eliminated from direct control of such interactions. Hall reports that US servicemen were ordered to supply the Tall Whites with foodstuffs, technological components, and more.


Worse yet, someone in the US command gave Tall Whites permission to kill US airmen who frightened them while on foot patrol, even though the airmen were never briefed about aliens on base grounds.


As William Cooper, former Navy intelligence advisor to the Pacific Fleet Commander, and CSETI witness Steven Lovekin both noted, Eisenhower felt betrayed by the Rockefeller faction that removed such interactions from basic, constitutional controls in order to keep them secret.

Three former airmen partly corroborate Charles Hall’s story about Tall Whites, and reported MJ-12 member Dr. Michael Wolf told Chris Stoner that parts of a gray alien craft that crashed in the ocean west of San Diego in 1941 were shipped to the Air Force base at Indian Springs, NV (the Tall Whites location). Wolf said he worked on the base for a time.


Wolf specialized in aliens and said he advised President Bill Clinton about alien matters. In Wolf’s house, journalist Paola Harris saw a photo of Bill Clinton signed with Clinton’s personal thank-you to Wolf.

In alien societies, remote sensing is considered a reliable investigation method, and aliens routinely do remote sensing to check on cases like the Tall Whites. The Tall Whites’ status is easy for humans to discern via remote sensing because their energy and communications network appears to bundle into that of the Verdants.


This has been checked repeatedly (see how-to chapter) and has been repeatedly underscored by non-IFSP aliens. Even IFSP and “three ellipticals” aliens have tacitly admitted it. In their defense, they concede that multiple approaches are needed for the IFSP strategy.


They suggest that the IFSP’s off-world human-hybrid enclaves are small in number compared to the human population, but the scheme is typical of Verdant resort to spectacle and excess. Rather than ask our permission, they occupied nearby star systems under the pretense of tending to a brief phase of human evolution. No doubt during interventions elsewhere they’ve taken similar planets for themselves.

Now that humans are beginning to openly discuss gray alignment strategy, Verdants are reportedly instructing their operatives to spawn conflict here in order to make us more vulnerable. Non-IFSP aliens have pointed this out repeatedly. They say it’s worse than most humans would suspect, and specific cases have been cited. We’ve heard Verdants say they spent much time and effort on this planet, as though they deserve a larger role here. They say they’ve monitored us for centuries.

However, there’s reason to suspect that Verdants want to preserve their home galaxy and use the Δt energy resources of other galaxies, instead. They may want to expand their negative-cycle network in order to impose their preferences elsewhere. The question is how hyper-advanced aliens view that.


When a hyperversal raised the question,

“What do you do when a large elliptical galaxy begins (to tilt) dangerously?”.

...the subtext was clear:

Giant ellipticals like M87 spew vast jets of material from the axes of their central black holes, which can drastically affect surrounding galaxies.

Depending on various factors, including Verdant use of Δt/alt t, the way Centaurus A tilts and spews its giant plumes of material could affect its entire galaxy group.



* See its giant plumes at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080110150936.htm Verdants and the “three ellipticals” faction may hope to use our surroundings in order to rig the Δt/alt t gravitic environment in the their favor. But don’t expect them to admit it - they shirk discussion of the subject, while competing aliens have suggested that it’s a valid concern. Centaurus A (below image) poses a refugee and energy ecology dilemma that may be used to rationalize “three ellipticals” policy regarding Verdants.




Finally, it’s possible that hyperversals, themselves, use energy in a way that directly affects the Δt/alt t ecology, the spatial configuration, and the gravitic orientation of all galaxies in the universe.


The topic has been mentioned by hyperversals.

To return to our main topic: When the notion of physicality is discussed during, and in the context of, alien interactions, the basic message is yes, we’re all part of a universal whole, but none of us are equal to it.


None of us are solely spirit in that sense. We create waste and have diseases. Some of us take from others in unequal measure. This certainly doesn’t exclude the possibility of a more enduring realm of energy, or spirit. Even aliens talk about the subject yet do so in more advanced scientific terms (a hyper-dynamic that only exists or can be observed and seemingly animated collectively).

Another recurring discussion surrounds the subject of ego, specious pretensions, and the need to expand community considerations. We often hear that vast-scale community interactions are a more advanced premise and require the setting aside of physical desires and an end to jockeying for resources. Some might ask, how is that possible?


The answer given, if not seemingly embedded in every aspect of the continuum, is that those who pose the question haven’t thought about it carefully enough.


The most advanced beings and interactions must fade out their sense of themselves in order to even know the larger community. The Buddhist notion of selflessness and non-propagation is analogous. The lesson for hyper-advanced aliens busied by the schemes and impulses of recently evolved aliens is clear: reduce resource use and reduce population, which requires such beings to spread their awareness and immerse within younger aliens’ lives in order to teach them similarly.


In a sense it’s a more condensed kind of existence, yet it’s also more expanded and airy, more subtle (just like hyperspace).

So there’s a built-in conservation. All life can drain or deplete the possibilities of other life forms, hence all must learn from increasingly larger interactions. Rather than yearn to travel and enjoy themselves beneath the light of billions of distant stars, as some Verdants prefer, the majority must seek greater knowledge inwardly.


Otherwise, this universe is toast, and vast contingents of resource predators will grow and contend with each other, ruining the possibilities for others. We must model it all on a universal scale - over great periods of time, not on our physical wants and impulses. There’s a great tradition of the sort.

Aliens clearly frown on private space ventures because government must control excess through policy and because private ventures provide a back door for infiltration and takeover by other aliens.


The IFSP now tries to keep alien-related US programs semi-private to maintain secrecy and influence us without public discussion and expose. As far as we know, no aliens, anywhere - certainly no hyperversals - have yet told humans about “private” alien space ventures, probably because they don’t exist.


Tiny IFSP puppet enclaves may pretend otherwise, but to them that’s a dog and pony sideshow for human primitives.        


Back to Contents