by Philip Jones

from Rense Website


Philip Jones
I am a fifty one year old British man, living in Denmark, who prior to relocating here in 1996, had spent fifteen years in the Metropolitan Police in London, and before that, six years in the Military.

It was my relocation here which opened my eyes to the reality of the world I lived in. We who are involved in this field of enquiry generally state that we are searching for the 'truth.'

I have found that the 'truth' is rather elusive, as just when one feels sure that it is there, within one's grasp, it flutters away only to be replaced by something else, which for a short while at least masquerades as the 'truth.'

What I am trying to say is that this is a continuous learning 'curve,' and an open, yet steadfast mind is needed in order to continue ever onwards towards that most elusive and holiest of 'grails:' 'The Truth.'

I bid you welcome.




Part One

28 July 2009


Diagram by Ivor Benson

“It is almost a joke now in the Western world, in the 20th century, to use words like 'good and 'evil'. They have become almost old fashioned concepts, but they are very real and genuine concepts. These are concepts from a sphere which is higher than us. And instead of getting involved in base, petty, short-sighted political calculations and games.


We have to recognize that the concentration of world Evil and the tremendous force of hatred is there and it's flowing from there throughout the world. And we have to stand up against it and not hasten to give to it, give to it, give to it, every-thing that it wants to swallow.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn




It was in 2006 that I was finally able to identify those factors which had, during the course of my lifetime, turned what we call western society into little more than a 'virtual prison,' the true and complete nature of which had previously been largely invisible to me. For perhaps two decades, I had felt a 'nagging' discomforting sense that something wasn't quite right.


But like most everyone else, I had imagined the prevailing social conditions to have evolved benignly and naturally, rather than having been orchestrated and then manipulated into being. In truth, the journey towards this discovery took some twenty six years, from my early days in the Police Force in London, to my relocation to Denmark in 1996, and then to that moment when, some three years ago, the shocking truth hit me like a hammer across the head!

It became apparent that since the day I was born (1958), the reality of my very existence had been indirectly controlled and dictated by a conspiratorial group of super rich and powerful individuals, working behind the scenes, manipulating the events which shaped all our lives, creating chaos all around, causing reactions from the unsuspecting majority, which then in turn enabled them to advance their nefarious agenda, by responding with their 'ready made' solutions.


Solutions carefully designed to advance the imposition of a Global State.

By making diabolical use of the Hegelian Dialectic, these conspirators have slowly but surely brought us all to the point of no return. With the much vaunted and somehow expected 'Swine Flu' epidemic acting as thesis, and the world wide mandated vaccination program and the resulting mayhem as antithesis, the desired synthesis could well be the dialectical catalyst which inaugurates the Luciferians long held dream of a New World Order: Global solutions for global problems!

The decision is ours now. Do we simply acquiesce? Do we go quietly into the night? Do we stand or do we fall?

For most of last year, as the information and knowledge which finally put most pieces of the 'jigsaw puzzle' into place, came to me like an avalanche and I strived to disseminate that knowledge by writing articles.


Many articles, which, through along with some local sites, were, judging by the international response I received, read throughout the 'English speaking world,' and to a lesser degree, here at 'home.' My writing brought me into contact with some exceptional and gifted individuals, nowhere more so than in Denmark, the small Northern European Country which has been my home for eleven out of the past thirteen years.

What may come as a surprise to many reading this article, is that of those people here in Denmark, who responded positively to my writing, many were muslim. Through these contacts, I was able to consolidate that knowledge of the Islamic faith, I had gained whilst working in London, and learned to further appreciate how the followers of that system of belief viewed the world around them.


Of course, very many muslims are, just like their counterparts in christianity, oblivious to what is generally termed the 'Global Conspiracy.' But I also found among them some very aware, knowledgeable and sincere individuals who like myself, understood that there was serious trouble on the horizon [7].

The truth is that we have more in common than most realize, and they, (muslims) like the rest of us, have been abused and manipulated, herded even, into situations which suit no one except the Illuminists.

Having largely de-constructed christianity here in the West, the Illuminati are now using the same tried and tested methods on the Islamic world, knowing that the only thing which stands between them and total victory, is Islam, along with those few steadfast believers who still remain faithful to the christian faith.

So what can we do?

Edmund Burke wrote this over a century ago on the subject of State Tyranny:

“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing”.

Prophetic words indeed and particularly pertinent to the age we now live in. Have people ever been more apathetic, more indifferent to their fate than they are today?


Locked into a 'mind prison' created by the illusion of affluence and instant gratification, humanity, at least here in the west, appears to have abdicated all responsibility to the 'Professionals.'


The Politicians, Judges, Lawyers, Bankers, Doctors and Professors, and look where this irresponsibility has led us. To the brink of a 'Fourth Reich' [5] much more terrible than the previous attempt at World Dictatorship, as it has been done with the apparent consent of 'we the people' in the guise of democratic elections.


We have actually given our enemies permission to go ahead and enslave us.

In the movie 'The Matrix,' the Morpheous character says this:

"The Matrix is a system, Neo, and that system is our enemy. When you are inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters, the very minds of the people we are trying to save.


But until we do, these people are part of that system and that makes them our enemies. You have to understand most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many are so... hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it."


But my point is this: the primary means by which they defeat us is the old 'divide and conquer.' By the relentless propagation of feminism, they have divided man from his mate, and by the use of a massive anti-Islam propaganda campaign, especially since the 9/11 'False Flag Op,' have set muslim against christian.

We must be ever aware that the muslims and christians I refer to here, are not those Masonic 'fifth columnists' machinating and plotting within those faiths, whose sole loyalty is to Lucifer and who further the Illuminist Agenda by playing the 'Agent Provocateur.' No!


I speak of those who, with a pure heart, worship the same creator and try to live good and decent lives, despite all the evil which seems to pervade all of life these days.


They may call him by a different name, Allah, Jehovah or Yahweh, and yes, there are certain differences in doctrine. But still, these faithful men and women have far more which binds them than which separates them. And it is that which we have in common which we must now focus on. For the sake of humanity, let it be so.

The famous Lucius Cassius, whom the Roman people used to regard as a very honest and wise judge, was in the habit of asking, time and again,

'Cui Bono' or 'To whose benefit?'

Who has benefited from the turbulence and fracture we have witnessed in the aftermath of 9/11? Certainly not those who live in the in the Islamic world, nor those of us here in the west, who have seen our societies developing into Police States as ever more of our personal freedoms are removed, all in the name of national security.

The only beneficiaries that I can see are those working within the Illuminati, in the furtherance of what Alice Bailey [6] termed 'The Plan.'



The Clash Of Civilizations.

September 11th, 2001, provided the elite cabal known as the 'Illuminati' with the opportunity to finally put into motion the plan devised by the Freemason Albert Pike,[3] and written about more recently by Samuel Huntington in his book, 'The Clash of Civilizations - A Global War Against Islam.'


As William Engdahl pointed out:

“If the Bush administration had been unprepared for the shock of September 11, 2001, they certainly wasted no time in preparing their response, the war on terror. Terror was to replace communism as the new global image of 'the enemy.'


On September 18, 2001, Niaz Niak, the former Pakistani foreign secretary, told the BBC he had been informed by senior US officials at a mid-July 2001 Berlin meeting, that “military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.”

Ultimately, the invasion of Afghanistan was a furtherance of the initial plans devised by Zbigniew Brzezinski to gain control over Central Asia.

In his book, 'Terrorism And The Illuminati,' [4] Canadian author David Livingstone writes:

“Islam does not pose a threat to the West. It is the contrary that is correct. Islamic terrorist organizations are hotbeds of impostors in service of the West. It is well known that there are various dubious relationships that exist between Islamic radicals and Western powers. The truth is far more sinister. Islamic terrorists are connected with Western power through an intricate network of secret societies.


While outwardly claiming to adhere to disparate religions, the Islamic terrorists follow a heretical version of the faith, ultimately rooted, like their counterparts in the West, in the same occult doctrine, the worship of Lucifer, and the belief in the use of religion as a disguise to deceive the masses.”

Many researchers believe the Illuminati plan is to unleash a Third World War in the near future, from which will emerge their New World Order. This projected confrontation is being presented as a so called 'Clash of Civilizations,' between the purportedly Democratic West and Islamic fundamentalism.

But does Islam really pose a threat to the west?


The reality is that the muslim world has been so weakened by its own internal corruption, along with the subversive activities of the Western powers that since the demise of the Ottoman Empire, the muslim world has been in complete disarray, incapable of uniting to even represent Islam, let alone defend itself.

This fact was acknowledged by the primary architect of the fabricated threat: Zbigniew Brzezinski.


As to whether or not Islam is a menace to the Western World today, he states:

“Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers.


But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the christian countries.”

Therefore, in order to negatively prejudice Western consciousness against Islam, the Illuminati, through its control of the international intelligence agencies, has artificially fomented militancy throughout the Islamic world, by the creation of terrorist groups together with the propagation of the illusion of Islam’s imagined competition with the not so 'democratic' West.


Context And Perspective

In my recent five part series, 'To Kill A Tree,' [1] I outlined and discussed the Illuminati 'Global Conspiracy' to create a New World Order, exposing their 'Modus Operandi,' and then discussing the various 'theatres' of operation within which their plans to introduce their world wide 'prison state' are being driven towards their diabolically illogical conclusion.

In 'Who Rules World?' [2] I introduced the reader to the historic, mythological and scriptural background to the Illuminati's 'belief system' and thereby, the ideological basis upon which they justify their conviction of their own superiority over humankind. During the three parts in that series, I hypothesized that the true ruler of the world was in fact, the master adversary, Lucifer, and feel fairly satisfied that to all intents and purposes, I proved my case.

In this new series, I intend to explore a new concept of Alliance between christians, muslims and those followers of the judaic faith, who are sick and tired of seeing their religion used as a justification for colonialist imperialism, mass slaughter and the insidious meddling in the affairs of sovereign states around the world, in order to further the Luciferian aims of the Illuminati, many of whose leading members hide their true spiritual allegiance behind the mask of Judaism.

But as always, before we can get to the solution, we must first review the problem.


An Age Of Conflict - The Historical Facts

There are two kinds of knowledge:

  • knowledge of the world outside ourselves, the macrocosm

  • knowledge of the kingdom within, the microcosm, both of which are boundless

The better we know ourselves, the easier it will be to know the world; alternatively, the better we know the world around us, the easier it will be to know ourselves and understand our deepest and most enduring needs.

It is not more knowledge that we need for the purpose of strengthening our position as individuals, but only knowledge of a kind that holds together and makes sense. We need a coherent interpretation of the history of the age in which we live and an insight into what it is we must have, if we are to be physically well and in good spirits.


The following paragraph from a book by three university historians, published in 1949, whose summations are entirely in accordance with the prophecy of Albert Pike [3], will serve as a starting point for an exploration of what they describe as "this age of conflict:"

“Two world wars and their intervening wars, revolutions and crises are now generally recognized to be episodes in a single age of conflict which began in 191l and has not yet run its course. It is an age that has brought to the world more change and tragedy than any other in recorded history. Yet, whatever may be its ultimate meaning and consequence, we can already think of it and write of it as a HISTORIC WHOLE.”

An age of conflict that must be thought of 'as a whole' must also be capable of being explained and understood as a whole; therefore, it is a highly condensed and simplified synopsis of the history of our times that we must have if the seemingly interminable succession of 'episodes' of conflict and tragedy is to be seen as a whole and understood.


The method I have chosen is to begin with a list of categorical statements which can be developed and expanded later and supported with an extensive bibliography.


Here they are:

  1. Our age of conflict is the product of a dark alliance of 'magic,' money and intellect, with intellect almost invariably subordinate to and in the service of money, and money likewise being in the service of magic; The infernal forces of magic manipulating both money and intellect to it's will, with money being since the 20th century the primary overt source of it's visible power.

  2. We need to identify the changes which have occurred in the realms of money and intellect. Changes which have made our age so different from all others in recorded history.

  3. The change which has occurred in the realm of money is this: certain groupings of finance-capitalism which had been separate and nationally oriented were absorbed into a greater international 'constellation' of finance-capitalism, serving a very different set of long-term interests.

  4. The change which occurred in the realm of intellect is this: in the West, christian orthodoxy was replaced by an ideology of socialism as the basis of a consensus intellectual frame of reference and system of values. This socialism or secular religion has given rise to what the psychologist Carl Gustav Jung has described as a "psychic epidemic" now afflicting the educated classes in the West.

  5. The changes which heralded our century of conflict were first seen in South Africa in in the late 1890s, producing the Anglo-Boer war (the first of three great fratricidal wars in the west), the beginning of the end of the British Empire and the beginning of a new and unprecedented kind of world 'imperium.'

  6. These changes in money and intellect have drawn the peoples of the West into a dialectical trap, with money as thesis, socialism as antithesis and the new imperium as synthesis; money incessantly concentrates power, socialism promises the total dispersal and distribution of power; the resolution of this contradiction supplies the new imperium with its dynamic.

  7. The process of the transference of financial power to the new imperium was only completed in the 1930s when J.P. Morgan and the great American pioneering families lost their dominance in Wall Street.

  8. The immediate cause of the great increase in conflict all over the world: external interference with the natural hierarchical system or 'pecking order' within and among AMONG ethnic groups, as everywhere states were set up and regimes established, which had no local or NATURAL right to exist. This interference by 'third parties' is what makes episodes of conflict in the 20th century, and since quite different from conflicts in other ages, conferring on all of them a shared meaning.

  9. All these developments are linked to the moral evil of a system of money creation and debt in which the nations of the West are at the same time offenders and victims.

We can therefore consider our age of conflict as one historic whole, but what reason do we have to believe that it is the product of a uniform and continuous set of identifiable causes?

Students of history can provide innumerable examples of major influences, baffling to all at the time of their occurrence, which yielded finally to quite simple elucidation and explanation. It is not only in history that events widely separated in space and time can be found to have a combined meaning.


For example, a few years ago when over a period of many months there were visitations of freak weather all around the world, in many cases with disastrous consequences, the meteorologists were soon able to trace them all to a single cause or set of causes: they were able at least to show that the storms, floods, hurricanes, droughts, etc. belonged together and had an intelligible combined meaning.

Suffice to say, these meteorologists were not obstructed in their investigations by 'no-go' areas of inquiry, of the kind to be expected by those who seek to understand worldwide events of freak 'political' weather.


If conflict is as easy to present and understand as spells of freak weather, we still have no reason to suppose that we shall find satisfying explanations, but we are encouraged to hope that where we see globally, over many decades, a recognizable pattern of evil consequences, we can expect to find evidence of a uniform pattern of causes.


What is required is an interpretation of the history of the past one hundred and ten years or so, which will explain and render intelligible the major developments and changes which have occurred - changes which brought more conflict and tragedy than at any time previously in recorded history.


Tragedy And Hope

Among the few history books in which any attempt has been made to interpret recent history as a whole are Oswald Spengler's 'The Decline Of The West,' and Carroll Quigley's '
Tragedy And Hope.'

Spengler's main contribution to historiography is his theory of the morphology of history in which he assigns to our present civilization in the West a condition of irreversible decline. Paradoxically, he does not regard this as a pessimistic view. One fact emerges very clearly in Spengler's analysis: What happened in the 20th century must be seen and studied as an alliance of money and intellect with money, rather than pure politics, as the main moving power in world affairs.


Quigley leaves many things unexplained - he may have done so intentionally - but he supports with a good deal of documentary evidence the thesis that much of what has happened in our century has been deliberately 'Made To Happen.'

He offers us a conspiratorial theory of history involving a number of secret and semi-secret organizations like,

...all under the umbrella of what he calls an "Anglo-American network" of businessmen, educators, politicians and journalists.

Carol Quigley, who was a Professor of History and of International Relations at the Georgetown Foreign Service School, Washington DC, supplies much other well documented information which no one has yet tried to fit into a general inter-interpretation of the history of our century. His book, 'Tragedy And Hope' was hastily withdrawn by its publishers, the Macmillan Company, almost certainly because it was found to have contributed too much to a fully coherent interpretation of the history of our time – much to the chagrin of those who prefer to work under a cloak of secrecy.

The theory that much of what has happened has been orchestrated and manipulated into being, is further supported by another consensus historian, Arnold Toynbee, not in his monumental 'A Study Of History,' but in his other public utterances, of which the following example is taken from a paper read at the Fourth Annual Conference of the Institute for the Scientific Study of International Relations at Copenhagen in June 1931 (published in INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS):

“We are at present working discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world.


And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be, perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited.”

Quite clearly, the denudation of the national states of much of their sovereignty during the 20th century represented for Quigley and Toynbee part of the progressive fulfillment of their ideal of an elaborately planned 'Brave New World' to be raised on the flattened ruins of the old - for Quigley a world of 'hope' with which to replace a world of 'tragedy,' a world of planned revolutionary change to replace a disorderly world of slow revolutionary change.

So where and when did this 'age of conflict' begin? The three co-authors quoted above maintain that it began in 1914 with World War I.


But there are sound reasons to believe that in truth, it began earlier with the Anglo- Boer War of 1898-1902, which we can now recognize clearly, as being the 'beginning of the end' of the British Empire and the inauguration of another imperium of a far more mysterious kind.


The Anglo Boer War

If we agree that our 'Age of Conflict' began with the Anglo- Boer War, then it is in South Africa that we may have the best chance of seeing more clearly the crucial historical change that was to spark off a great chain reaction of change involving the whole world.


Prior to that time, the record of the British Empire had been one of continuous progress, marred only by the ostensible loss of the American colonies. Great Britain had 'out paced' all it's rivals in the 19th century's scramble for colonial possessions, and could boast by the turn of the 20th century to possess an 'empire on which the sun never set.'

However, things were about to change.


The Afrikaners – or Boers, as they were called, who had 'trekked' from Britain's Cape Colony into South Africa's virtually unpopulated hinterland, found themselves the owners of the world's richest gold fields. Therefore, the subsequent zeal displayed by British 'race-nationalists,' like Cecil John Rhodes and Alfred Milner, to add the new Boer Republic of the Transvaal to the British Empire, which when placed in context, is totally characteristic. In fact, considering the climate of thought and sentiment prevailing at that time, not to have done so with such a valuable prize at stake, would have been virtually unthinkable.

The Boer War proved unexpectedly costly both in lives and money. Britain succeeded in adding to its empire both the Transvaal and its ally in the struggle, the Orange Free State republic, but all this happened in circumstances mysteriously different from those that had attended all previous imperial conquests. The British people themselves had been sharply divided on the issue, until the first shots were fired by the Boers.


General Sir William Butler, then Commander-in-Chief of British forces in South Africa and one of the empire's most loyal servants, had voiced his opposition to the prospect of war against the Boers in the sternest of terms. It was also a war which gave rise to a greater outpouring of false communication than at any other in British colonial history.

In his book, 'The War In South Africa' J.A. Hobson writes:

"We are fighting in order to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power in Pretoria. Englishmen would do well to recognize that the economic and political destinies of South Africa are, and seem likely to remain, in the hands of men most of whom are foreigners by origin whose trade is finance and whose trade interests are not British."

Thomas Pakenham, in his book, THE BOER WAR, published in 1979, concurred and had this to say about the causes of that war:

"First there is a thin golden thread woven by the 'gold bugs', the Rand millionaires who controlled the richest mines in the world. It has been hitherto assumed by historians that none of the 'gold bugs' was directly concerned in making the war. But directly concerned they were...


I have found evidence of an informal alliance between Sir Alfred Milner, the High Commissioner, and the firm of Wernher-Beit, the dominant Rand mining house. It was this alliance, I believe, that gave Milner the strength to precipitate the war.”

Among the financial pioneers were Englishmen Rhodes, Rudd and J.B. Robinson.


These had all made their fortunes in South Africa, but the others, "the small group of international financiers, chiefly German in origin and Jewish in race," were wealthy when they arrived in the country and had appeared to have access to limitless funds in Europe, including the German Dresdner Bank, believed to be largely owned by 'Wernher Beit.'


Cecil Rhodes turned to the London Rothschild's for money with which to buy out his rivals and gain complete control of the diamond industry in Kimberley.

General Sir William Butler was emphatic about who he considered to be the decisive sources of power and motivation in precipitating the war, 'the train-layers' setting the political gunpowder, as he called them.


In a dispatch to the War Office in June 1899 he wrote:

"If the Jews were out of the question, it would be easy enough to come to an agreement, but they are apparently intent upon plunging the country into civil strife... indications are too evident here to allow one to doubt the existence of strong undercurrents, the movers of which are bent upon war at all costs for their own selfish ends."

Noticed by few, and understood by fewer, effective control of the British Empire, at a decisive point in history, had momentarily passed out of British hands.


Or, put another way, the centre of gravity of real power in the world had shifted significantly. That was the 'mysterious' change that was to inaugurate a chain reaction of more change, initially for the British Empire and then for the whole world. More precisely, it was the first clear sign of the commencement of a process of change in the realm of finance-capitalism which was not to be complete before the middle of the 1930s.

The other changes which occurred are less readily noticeable. One of the most important of these being radical transformational changes in warfare methodology.


It was at this point and time in human history that the human mind itself became a battleground for warring interests as never before.


Political Warfare

Von Clausewitz's 'war by other means,' there has always been but never before on the scale practised after the turn of the 20th century.


The use of 'persuasion' as a means by which a population was made ready for war there had always been; but the world was to encounter in the late 1890s something unprecedented in the quantity and audacity of the lying propaganda that was used to drag the British people, evidently against their will, into the Anglo-Boer War.

This new evil, or the reintroduction of an older evil on a massive scale, came as a great shock to General Butler, who wrote this to the Colonial Secretary on December 18, 1898:

"All the political questions in South Africa and nearly all the information sent from Cape Town are being worked by what I have already described as a colossal syndicate for the spread of false information. South Africa presents a unique example of a large press, owned, controlled and operated by a small body of men with the direct aim of bringing about a conflict which shall serve their business interests."

For the purposes of this series, we need only mention a few of the major historic changes which ensued.


They are:

  • the Anglo-Boer War

  • the Two World Wars

  • the Bolshevik Revolution and the setting up of the Soviet Union as an industrial and military super-power

  • the dismantling of the colonial empires and conversion of the former colonies into new nations, few of them economically viable

  • the delivery of mainland China and other vast areas in the Far East to totalitarian socialist rule

  • the setting up of the United Nations with its innumerable agencies as the prototype of some form of world government

  • the progressive undermining of the national sovereignty of all the Western nations

In order to understand the forces at work which brought humankind to it's current woeful state, we need to examine what were those deep-seated changes in human affairs at the end of the 19th Century and beginning of the 20th Century, which gave rise to a worldwide chain-reaction of conflict and catastrophe.






Part 2
August 05, 2009

Real power is achieved when the ruling class controls the material essentials of life, granting and withholds them from the masses as if they were privileges; as George Orwell reflected:

"From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations.


But it was also clear that an all-around increase in wealth threatened the destruction... of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motorcar or even an air-plane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. Such a society could not long remain stable.


For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away.


In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance...


It is deliberate policy to keep even the favored groups somewhere near the brink of hardship because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another...


The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. "


In this second part in the series, I will show that around the turn of the 20th Century, manufactured deep-rooted changes occurred primarily in two quite separate realms:

  • Those of money and intellect, and how this alliance formed a 'Nexus Of Evil,' which in it's service of the darkest forces of magic, has in this the first decade of the 21st Century, built a global control grid around our lives.

  • And how by using what is nothing less than sorcery disguised as 'New Age Metaphysics,' it has achieved complete hegemony over money, politics, religion, the media, big business, and education. It has subverted culture, rewritten history, falsified science, and by the expert use of the dialectical trap, has manipulated and coerced humanity into abject acquiescence and compliance, and is now preparing to deliver it's final blow which will plunge our world into a global conflagration of hitherto unimagined ferocity.

The precursors to this are the current financial crisis and quite probably, the expected 'Swine flu' outbreak, which will, if informed forecasts and predictions are correct, open up the 'Quarantine Camps,' [7] for those citizens who refuse the jab, and cause untold suffering for those who don't.


The Storm Centre

So, continuing on, let us begin with an examination of the great change which took place in the world of money.


It is highly significant that during the first years of the 20th century, a phenomenon appeared, that was to remain a conspicuous feature of the ensuing age of conflict, namely the concentration camp, a symbol of an expanded savagery in which civilians were joined with soldiers in the front line of every major conflict.

Towards the end of the 19th century, money began to acquire a new role and meaning in human affairs as economics began to prevail over politics. The two need to be clearly distinguished as sources of value, motivation and control at the elite level of leadership. Politics in its pure uncorrupted form, is a social function concerned with the welfare of a community, long-term as well as short-term, in which the requirements of economics, although always important, play only a supportive or secondary role.

Economic thinking, a mere department of political thinking, is concerned exclusively with the requirements of economic prosperity and progress. It assumes automatically that whatever is good for business is good for the community as a whole, an attitude of mind that excludes virtually all other considerations, and which today, to the detriment of humankind, can be witnessed to be the primary consideration for all governments.

What happened towards the end of the 19th century was, therefore, not a sudden occurrence; rather, it should be seen as a crucial stage, having been reached in a process which had continued slowly during most of the preceding century.


Not only did the Anglo-Boer War signal the beginning of the end of the British Empire, it also marked the beginning of the end of national financial sovereignties across the Western world, a process that would culminate in the 1930s, when the 'great' American pioneering families, headed by J.P. Morgan, were finally squeezed out of their dominating position on Wall Street.

In the relationship between politics and high finance, there subsisted a very complex state of affairs until shortly before the commencement of World War II, which can be briefly explained as follows:

There had existed for centuries within the national states of the Western world families or dynasties of bankers, like the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Montefiores, etc. who lent to governments and specialized in transactions across national frontiers, but these were never fully integrated as a system capable of controlling politics on an international scale.


These concentrations of high finance, although always influential, lacked the power wholly to control the politics of the national states, but each remained an important part of a nationally oriented 'constellation' of financial power.

This situation suited them well enough in the circumstances prevailing until the turn of the 20th Century. Yes, they were able to exert enormous influence, both nationally and internationally, but nothing like the almost omnipotent power they would later acquire.


Paradoxically, despite the enormous lead which the Jewish banking dynasties had gained in international commerce, it was initially the 'gentile' financiers with their ownership and access to the 'cornucopia' of new wealth, plus their control of national politics, who first established high finance on a fully internationalized basis.


The facts are supplied by Dr. Carroll Quigley:

"The apex of the system was to be the Bank of International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury bonds, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by sub-sequent economic rewards in the business world."

Tragedy and Hope

Quigley explains further that the Rothschild's had been pre-eminent during much of the 19th century, but at the end of that century,

"they were being replaced by J.P. Morgan", whose central office was in New York, although it operated as if it were in London, "Where it had indeed originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838."

The process by which the separate national concentrations of financial power were finally absorbed into a global concentration was not completed until the 1930s.


This 'Coup d'Etat' of money being the prime motor which produced among other consequences, the rise of the Third Reich in Germany, the outbreak of World War II, the subsequent involvement of the United States and Japan, and the construction up of a Marxist-Leninist People's Republic of China.

Professor Quigley[6] supplies many of the facts about the final shift in the centre of gravity of financial power, and his story begins with these ominous words:

"The third stage of capitalism is of such overwhelming significance in the history of the twentieth century, and its ramifications and influences have been so subterranean and even occult, that we may be excused if we devote considerable attention to its organization and methods."

The 'story,' which has been assembled from a vast accumulation of documented facts, is one of a process of change in the United States, beginning before World War I, which Wilmot Robertson was later to describe as the,

"dispossession of the American majority", culminating in what Quigley calls "a shift on all levels, from changing tastes in newspaper comic strips... to profound change in the power nexus of the 'American Establishment'"

Since the 1880s the United States had been ruled from behind the scenes by a plutocracy supported by the fortunes of the American 'bloodline' families; [8] Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Mellon, Duke, Whitney, Ford, Du Pont, etc. - a power constellation with J.P. Morgan as its banking centre.


This 'Eastern Establishment' is described by Quigley as "high Episcopalian, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, and European-culture-conscious", and was matched with a similar establishment on the other side of the Atlantic with Montagu Norman as its banking head.


The two worked closely together and came to be known as the "Anglo- American Establishment."

Quigley documents the,

"decline of J.P. Morgan itself from its deeply anonymous status as a partnership (founded in 1861) to its transformation into an incorporated public company in 1940 to its final disappearance by absorption into its chief banking subsidiary, the Guaranty Trust Company, in 1959".

Quigley writes,

"the less obvious implication of the shift in Wall Street was the realization by the Morgan group that it no longer had the votes on the Board of Trustees of Columbia University to nominate a successor to Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, the retiring president."

The control of American higher education had by stealth been taken out of the hands of America's 'Eastern Establishment' families, described by Quigley in the paragraph above, in a manner indicating that they were not Jewish, as Wall Street subsequently fell into the hands of the international financiers like a ripe plum.


The battle having been fought and won in the realm of parliamentary politics by methods which are still standard practice in the Western world; these include the financing of party politics, the manipulation of public opinion through the medium of newspapers, radio, the cinema, the book trade, etc., plus the penetration, financing and manipulation of trade union movements.

This was a take-over exercise in which America s emerging secret rulers could draw on many centuries of accumulated expertise and experience as a nation struggling to survive in dispersion. The eclipse of the power of the great American Families first took the form of taxation laws, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913 and culminating in the inheritance tax, which drove all the great family fortunes into the refuge of tax-exempt foundations.


Morgan and his circle lost control of the Federal Government as one 'money-and-intellect alliance' was subtly replaced by another. And the fact that a money-and-intellect alliance behaves in much the same way no matter who controls it made the change all the more difficult to detect.

The Morgan group dabbled in the politics of the radical left and lost no time in trying to get a foothold in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution. But at this game they were no match for their Jewish rivals. The rival Wall Street elites may have been fuelled by the ideal and ambition of a 'New World Order' but there the similarity ended.

The original American establishment, like its British opposite number, was for containing the Soviet Union and its socialist rulers, with a view to the ultimate absorption of the Russian empire into a New World Order to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire and which they, as inheritors of the Rhodes dream, would control.


The other, the new Eastern Establishment. was for building up the Soviet Union as an industrial and military giant which would replace the British Empire as the foundation of a New World Order. These developments in the realm of finance capitalism and power politics came to a climax towards the end of the 1930s, coinciding with a considerable eruption all over the Western world of a social phenomenon misleadingly described as 'anti-Semitism.'

In his book, 'This Age Of Conflict,' Ivor Benson quotes Professor Hannah Arendt, who writes:

"Twentieth century political developments have driven the Jewish people into the storm centre of events... the Jewish question and anti-Semitism... became the catalytic agent first for the rise of the Nazi movement and the establishment of the organizational structure of the Third Reich... then for a world war of unparalleled ferocity. "

'The Origins of Totalitarianism'

Henry Ford, who for many years had been a fierce critic of the big bankers as being the natural enemies of private enterprise industry, was quick to draw a clear distinction between the house of Morgan, which he described as "constructive", and its rivals, whom he described as "warmongers".


Morgan himself, like his opposite number in London, Montagu Norman, was known to dislike the Jews. The talks of Father Coughlin and writings of Father Denis Fahey, the frantic efforts of Charles Lindbergh to keep America out of the war, and the activities of Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts in Britain, were all reactions to the appearance of the Jewish people in "the storm centre" of 20th century politics.


What all these alarming developments mean is that a highly concentrated Jewish financial power was suddenly seen to be gaining ascendancy in the West.


The English Idea

Another crucial aspect of the prevailing political reality evident during the last decades of the 19th century must now be more closely studied - namely, the thoughts about the future that were then circulating in the English ruling classes.


Cecil John Rhodes [4] was one of the most potent men of action in all of English history, but he was also a visionary and dreamer, pictured by friend and foe as a Colossus bestriding the continent of Africa. Rhodes possessed an ability to inspire activity and loyalty in others which was in every manner proverbial. In the realm of pure thought, however, the unifying and energizing agent was not Rhodes but John Ruskin,[5] a one time Slade Professor of Fine Arts at Oxford University, who had armed a generation of young Englishmen with an ideology of service having as its object the creation of a better and happier world.


This was to be imagined as an extended application of the civilizing and humanizing concept of the British Empire; it was to be a fellowship of free and independent states held together by an abstract principle which came to be labeled the 'English idea.'

The numinousity, or sense of magic, evoked by these ideas can be traced to a single cause: the ideology of a 'Brave New World,' with ostensible order and welfare for all mankind, offered as a alternative, even replacement for a religious orthodoxy that had long since begun to crumble under the impact of a scientific 'enlightenment;' there was in this ideal, something to restore to the existence of the intelligentsia class and its energetic scholars, a renewed sense of meaning, ideology, purpose and direction, and which moreover, quite ominously sanctified British imperial expansion and the personal advancement of all its servants.

So potent was this ideology as a secular religion that it won converts all over the Western world; even former leaders of the conquered Boers, including General Louis Botha, who was to be South Africa's first Prime Minister, and General Jan Christian Smuts, yielded to its psychic charm.

Practical measures to give effect to this political idealism took the form of a range of operations including the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the semi-secret Round Table movement, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the American Council on Foreign Relations, etc.

This was definitely a 'White Supremacist' affair, invoking on both sides of the Atlantic a racial response.


Ralph Durand, in a book about Oxford University published in 1909, wrote of,

"Cecil Rhodes of Oriel, the dreamer of great dreams... Believing that the preservation of the peace of the world lay in the hands of men of Teuton blood, he made provision in his will for the founding at Oxford of scholarships that would be open to citizens of the British Empire, the German Empire and the United States"

- OXFORD: ITS BUILDINGS AND GARDENS, published by Grant Richards, London.

The fatal flaw in this ideology does not belong to the art or science of politics, nor to that of high finance, but to an area of knowledge less readily accessible to exploration and discussion, namely, 'Metaphysics' or more correctly, 'Magic.'


Quigley puts his hand on the key to that riddle: each of the central banks in the different national states, he says, "sought to dominate its government" and to "influence co-operative politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world".

What this means is that something had already gone awry in the West's national power structures ­ all of which had by this time incorporated a system of money creation and debt, a devilishly corrupting influence with implications of infinite complexity. Money had become progressively the measure of all things, with a 'bloodline' ruling elite drawn less and less from the land and more and more from commerce and banking.


Western nations had, in reality, become plutocracies, capable of maintaining themselves in power with a public opinion no longer sought nor consulted as before, but which was manufactured and manipulated as required by newspapers, patronage and other 'rewards in the business world.'


Just such a conversion of money into public opinion and support was accomplished in Britain by Rhodes and Milner and their 'gold bug' partners, having a total disregard for all or any moral considerations. Money had shown what money could do.


There was, thus, an iron inevitability about the outcome of a struggle which the gentile financiers did not even see as a struggle.


An Alien High Finance

Firmly united by long-range political aims, increasingly influenced the politics of the different national states and finally displayed the gentile financiers as managers of the new international banking structure.


Those 'educated' minds, conditioned by John Ruskin's secular ideology which called for a 'new world' to be raised on the foundations of the British Empire, seem to have had no problems transferring their attachment and enthusiasm to the new ideology as set out by Marx and Engels.

Antony Sutton's trilogy, '
Wall Street And The Bolshevik Revolution,' [1] Wall Street And The Rise Of Hitler,[2] and Wall Street And FDR,[3] contains a vast quantity of information but is more remarkable for what it omits. For that Which is omitted is precisely what Professor Hannah Arendt correctly describes as the "catalytic agent" in the "storm centre of events", namely, the role of the jewish people in 20th century power politics.

Sutton maintains there is and always was only one "Wall Street Establishment", which he blames for the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution and later Hitler's rise to power in Germany. But this over-simplification is very misleading.

During the two preceding decades Wall Street had assumed a species of split personality, one half symbolized by Morgan and the other by Warburg. It is undeniable as alleged, that 'Wall Street' aiding in the financing of the Bolshevik Revolution, but in this, it was the Warburg faction (Jacob Schiff in particular) which took the initiative, with the Morgan faction eventually being on the receiving end of most if not all the adverse publicity as they belatedly tried to get in on the action.


Furthermore, there is a wealth of evidence which supports the contention that it was the Morgan interests on Wall Street which supported Hitler's rise to power. But at the same , it was the internationalists who were funding the German Communist Party in those crucial elections in 1930, in which the communists gained such spectacular successes?

When one understands the prevailing dynamics of the times, it becomes elementary to recognize that the fiercest political struggles occurring all over the West during the 1930s, can now be more clearly seen as being just so many proxy battles on behalf of rival concentrations of financial power, culminating in World II and the triumph of the internationalists.


An American Fascist Coup d'Etat

In Britain opposition to World War II came from what remained of the British end of the original Anglo-American establishment, labeled the 'Cliveden set'; Cliveden being the name of the home of Lord Astor. This interpretation will also help to explain one of the most mysterious episodes in American history; a reported attempt, with the assistance of the American Legion and armed forces, to set up a 'fascist ' dictatorship in America.

News of the plot was given brief front-page treatment in the NEW YORK TIMES on November 21, 1931; a congressional committee was set up to investigate the allegations; but then all news of the plot faded out of the press. Those involved included a few leading personalities in the American Legion and another organization known as Liberty League, which together seem to have undertaken to make available a force of 500,000 men.


Leadership of the operation was offered to Major-General Smedley D. Butler, a much decorated military hero, but there is no real evidence that he ever agreed to go along with the plotters.

Significantly, it is exclusively the gentile power -wielders of big finance and big business who were identified as the culprits behind the scene, all linked in one way or another with J.P. Morgan:

  • Grayson Murphy, a director of the Guaranty Company

  • Jackson Martindell, associated with Stone and Webster, allied to the Morgans

  • the DuPont Company

  • the Remington Arms Company, controlled by DuPont

  • the Morgan-Harriman financial interests

It would seem, therefore, that the Morganite financiers and industrialists, finding themselves at last out-maneuvered and out gunned in Wall Street, were tempted to take desperate measures against the international financiers - as had been done with some success in Italy and Germany.

As the rivalry of separate national constellations of financial power gave rise to the 19th century's scramble for colonial possessions, so the consolidation of financial power on a global basis in the 20th century required the dismantling of all the colonial empires and their replacement with innumerable new states over which the separate nations of the West would be able to exercise little or no influence.


A clear distinction must, thus, be drawn between the pace and quantity of change and conflict in the world up until l939, when the new imperium was still in the process of being established, and the pace and quantity of change and conflict after the new imperium had emerged as the only real victor in World War II.

In Part Three, we will examine the part played by Western 'Intellect' in the 'Nexus Of Evil' and identify it's manipulation and exploitation, and the role it has subsequently played in in the furthering of the Illuminati's Luciferian Agenda.



6] Tragedy And Hope


Part 3
August 08, 2009


The Role of Intellect In An Age Of Conflict

We will now look at the role played by Western 'Intellectual thought' in the 'Nexus Of Evil' and identify it's manipulation and exploitation, it's base in the occult, and the role it has subsequently played in in the furthering of the Illuminati's Luciferian Agenda.


In order to do so, we must now turn to and briefly examine the fundamental changes which occurred during the latter half of the 17th century onwards, in the realm of Western intellect, which can be regarded as one of the main causes of our age of conflict ­ it being the other half of that aforementioned 'alliance of money and intellect,' acting in the service of the forces of magic, and by that, I mean the Illuminati and ultimately Lucifer himself.

In my series, 'Who Rules The World,' I wrote;

"I personally do not believe that human beings, who in the majority, long for peace and happiness, are capable in themselves of such gross wickedness. What force drives men to such loathsome deeds, or maneuvers them into situations, where they feel compelled to commit such atrocities?


Like many today involved in this area of investigation, it is my contention that there is lurking in the shadows, behind the scenes, some purely wicked, invisible power which is, through its agents and disciples, manipulating, coercing and influencing people to commit terrible acts of treachery, violence, perversion, and what can only be termed unadulterated evil. If one steps outside the 'Matrix,' and considers the 'bigger picture,' this pandemic evil can be seen as being anything but a collection of random unconnected incidents and occurrences.


To the contrary, it appears to be a driven, systematic, controlled, and malevolent agenda, manipulating the course of world events towards a defined 'end game."

In the three articles which comprise that series, and which for the sake of continuity should be read as a precursor to this current collection, I introduced the hypothesis that the ills of humankind are and have always been the work of Lucifer, his 'Fallen Angels,' and subsequently, the Illuminati 'Bloodline' hybrid beings, who now through their control of all the 'seats' of global power, are preparing their final 'Coup d' Etat' on mankind.


In this current series of articles, we will deal with the 'nuts and bolts' of the conspiracy to dethrone God, subjugate and degrade humanity, and enthrone Lucifer as 'Lord Of This World.'

It is necessary to understand that the creation and eventual propagation of the secular humanist ideals we will be dealing with in the following paragraphs, were never intended by the Luciferians as an end in themselves, but rather as an interim means of breaking down, and tearing out from the hearts of Western men and women, their love of God, and replacing it with an eventual adoration of Lucifer.


In it's final stages, this development can be seen to have begun more than two centuries ago and to have been a major contributing factor in the decline of christianity as the consensus religion of the West.

The 'new' thought process and values system inaugurated as a result of the decline of the influence of christian orthodoxy came to be known as socialism. Socialism was however, only one of the symptoms of something with a much more profound metaphysical implication; a condition better represented by the words 'idealism' and 'humanism.'


Socialism is, in truth, a form of economic and political idealism.

It is this 'idealism' and the reality of the forces behind it which we need to understand. A pre-fabricated attitude to human existence that responds readily to any plausible system or ideology, ostensibly proposing one or another program, which on the surface, usually appears to be intended towards the form of a utopian betterment of the world and mankind, but which in essence, only serves the Luciferian agenda.

Such ideologies have included anarchism, nihilism, syndicalism, socialism, communism, etc. This idealism supplies the base psychic foundation for a false system of secular belief which acquires the force and intensity of the religion which it has replaced.


There is a fundamental and most important difference between,

  1. A metaphysical or religious system of belief

  2. A secular or humanist system of belief.

These differences can be thus defined as:

  1. All the great religions which have endured down the through the ages, however different in their orthodoxies are founded on the central belief that human existence, like everything else in the universe, is governed by immutable laws of cause and effect which the intelligence must discover and obey.


    What this amounts to is a recognition that human freedom finds fulfillment only as Freedom Under Law. We are free to do as we please but, if we are to avoid the disappointment of our hopes and expectations, if we are to preserve psychic health, we must first find out what can and what cannot be done.

  2. In the Bible book of Genesis, the seduction of Eve by Lucifer/Satan is enacted thus:

    • Now the serpent was more crafty than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.

    • And he said to the woman, "Indeed, has God said, 'You shall not eat from any tree of the garden'?"

    • The woman said to the serpent, "From the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat;

    • but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, 'You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.'"

    • The serpent said to the woman, "You surely will not die!

    • "For God knows that in the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."

Taking the above into consideration, it is no coincidence that fundamental to idealism or humanism is the idea that the human intellect is fully qualified to be a law unto itself in promoting purposes which can be visualized or imagined...


The element of error in this perception of the intellect as being the highest source of guidance in human affairs is extremely subtle, very difficult to detect, and even more so to explain; it can be compared with a compass deflection in navigation which progressively falsifies all positional and directional calculations. The ancients called it 'Hubris,' an attitude that presupposes that the intellect can conquer life itself as it can conquer the human environment.


Milton handles this most profound theme in the language of symbolism in his great epic poem 'Paradise Lost.'


The Magicians

It was the mysterious 'Count Cagliostro who had been primarily responsible for the incorporation of 'magic' into the Masonic Rite of Mizraim.


Napoleon Bonaparte's 'Grande Armee,' with its initiates of the Philalethes, Asiatic Brothers, and Martinists, then carried Cagliostro's Masons to Egypt, whereby they came in contact with the Grand Lodge of the Ismailis, established in the eleventh century, and known in the occult world, as the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor.

The enigmatic Comte St. Germain was reputedly the Grand Master of all Freemasonry at the time, and is said to have initiated Cagliostro into the mysteries of Egyptian Freemasonry.


Samuel Honis a native Egyptian, brought the Egyptian Rite to France, and in 1815, the lodge, 'Les Disciples de Memphis,' was founded by Honis, Marconis de Negre and others.

It soon attracted a large number of Frankists and some of its initiates (of which Karl Marx was one), became involved in a number of subversive movements. Marx, moved to Brussels in 1845, and together with Friedrich Engels, reorganized the Communist League. The League having evolved from the revolutionary French Jacobins, which themselves had been originally founded by the Bavarian Illuminati.

In 1848, Marx published his Communist Manifesto, in which he borrows heavily from Clinton Roosevelt's, 'The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law,' that echoed entirely the philosophies of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati.

In 'To Eliminate the Opiate,' Rabbi Antelman affirmed that Marx, far from being an atheist was, like his father a Shabbatean Frankist. Paul Johnson in his work the 'History of the Jews,' indicates that Marx's theory of history, closely resembled the Kabbalistic theories of the Messianic Age of Shabbatai Zevi's mentor, Nathan of Gaza.


Marx derived his philosophy of history from the Lurianic Kabbalah, through the influence of Hegel. Like Hegel, Marx believed that the world develops according to a dialectical formula, but he disagreed with Hegel as to the motive force of this development. Hegel believed in a mystical entity called Spirit.


For Marx, it was matter, not spirit.


The Blueprint

In 1870, Giuseppe Mazzini, Lord Palmerston of England, Otto Von Bismarck of Germany and Albert Pike, each a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Mason, inaugurated the supreme and universal rite of Freemasonry, that henceforth, would centralize all the high Masonic bodies throughout the world under one head.


To this end the Palladium Rite was created as the pinnacle of the pyramid of power: an international alliance to bring in the Grand Lodges, the Grand Orient, the ninety-seven degrees of Memphis and Mizraim of Cagliostro, and the Scottish Rite.

In a letter written to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871, Albert Pike graphically outlined plans for three world wars, that were seen as necessary to bring about the One World Order. As I have covered this previously at length in the series, To Kill A Tree, it will suffice to say here that the two fratricidal world wars of the 20th century went entirely according to script, and that Pike's letter predicted that the third global war would have to be fought against Islam.


This was in effect the blueprint for the 'Clash Of Civilizations,' scenario now being played out in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine.

Pike then told Mazzini that, after World War Three had ended, a global social cataclysm will be provoked that will be greater than the world has ever known:

"We shall unleash the Nihilists [meaning terrorists] and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.


Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.


This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Mikhail Bakunin

The political philosophy of Nihilism, originally devised by Kabbalists, Shabbetai Zevi, Jacob Frank and the Frankists, was further developed by Mikhail Bakunin. Bakunin was a Grand Orient Freemason, a disciple of Weishaupt, and like Marx, an avowed Satanist. Bakunin left Russia in 1842 and moved to Paris where he met Marx.


He participated in the 1848 French Revolution, and then moved to Germany where he called for the overthrow of the Habsburg Empire.

The most notable episode of Bakunin's later years was his quarrel with Marx. While living in Geneva in 1868, he joined the socialist First International. At the same time, however, he enrolled his followers in a semi-secret Social Democratic Alliance, which had a direct affiliation to the Illuminati, and which he conceived as a revolutionary avant-garde within the International.


The First International was opposed to Bakunin's activities, and at a congress in 1872 at The Hague, Marx secured the expulsion of Bakunin and his followers from the International. The resulting split in the revolutionary movement in Europe and the United States persisted for many years.

In the first meeting of Social Democratic Alliance, Bakunin, though a Magician and Satanist, openly professed atheism, and called for the Illuminati goals of the abolition of marriage, property, and of all social and religious institutions. Nihilism (like Satanism and the Kabbalah) rejected all religious (read christian godly) and political authority, social traditions, and traditional morality as standing in opposition to 'freedom.'


Every nation thus became the enemy, and the enemy was ferociously attacked using terrorism and assassination.


Reflecting the dictum of Weishaupt, Bakunin sought,

"the unchaining of what is today called the evil passions and the destruction of what is called public order," and made the declaration, still identified with nihilism.


"Let us put our trust in the eternal spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unsearchable and eternally creative source of all life the passion for destruction is also a creative passion!"

It is vital for the reader to understand that Atheism, Humanism and Idealism were cynical constructs of the Luciferian Magicians, and only that.


Used to break down christianity, they were the means to a Luciferian end, as opposed to 'bona fide' means in themselves. The whole secular humanist movement is a cloak for Luciferinaism, and whilst most of its disciples were and still are unaware of it, the elite 'provocateurs' knew it then as the do now.


The New Idealists

The almost irresistible attraction of socialism for those members of the utopia orientated 'educated' classes, who in the nineteenth century, found themselves without the support of their ancestral christian faith is, therefore, at least understandable, for it provided them with a highly plausible and ingeniously elaborate framework of ideas, which paradoxically (considering their Satanic origin) purported to be able to solve many, if not all of the world's evils, and to finally bring those ever so elusive elements of human existence, happiness and contentment to all of mankind.


It offered to the educated individual a laudable ambition and an integrated intellectual frame of reference, which promised to infuse his existence with new meaning and purpose. Yet it is precisely this very idealism, this attitude and this 'plausible' thinking, which has given our world over a hundred years of terrible conflict and tragedy which is without precedent in all of recorded history.

No manner of evil intentions in all of history, ever produced cruelty and disorder on so vast a scale as idealism or humanism have produced since the beginning of the 20th century. Supposed good intentions in the service of evil have been exposed by the experience of that history as being capable of producing the most dreadful of consequences.


It is in this area of conduct where ends are called on to justify means, that the human mind makes mistakes of a kind that the mind itself can not easily understand, and it is where the mind is most exposed to the influences of the most hostile cunning, emanating from the ultimate master of hostility and cunning.

The great mistake is to suppose that the means used can be justified by the quality of the ends proposed, when in fact, as experience may only demonstrate belatedly, it is only the actual results produced that can ever justify the means.


The idea that the laudable end envisioned, however distantly separated from the present, justifies the employment of whatever means are required for its attainment, is thus fundamental to idealism or humanism in whatever form it may take, whether as socialism or as that benevolent imperialism preached by John Ruskin, and which so captivated the mind of the young Cecil Rhodes.

An example of the above can be seen in the Illuminati's current and markedly accelerating drive towards the 'New World Order,' there are undoubtedly many working unwittingly and naively towards what they consider to be 'laudable ends,' having no idea that they are furthering a Totalitarian Luciferian Agenda.

Political idealism in action exhibits two major negative aspects: it undertakes long-term enterprises which are incapable of actualization because it finds itself in conflict with unalterable requirements of human nature as expressed in instinct, and it produces among its 'believers' a progressive blunting or description of what, for want of a more precise description, we can call 'a sense of evil.'


In other words, immoral behavior in the service of an ideal is condoned and even recommended, and any suffering that ensues is habitually regarded with indifference as part of the price that must be paid for 'progress.'


Socialism As A Substitute

After a long period of incubation in Germany and central Europe during the early part of the 19th century, Socialism was accorded more scholarly credentials in the form of 'dialectical materialism,' defined as a materialistic interpretation of existence, by Karl Marx, which was later to be presented in a more delusive and acceptable form by leading British intellectuals, such as Edward Pease, George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb.


The Fabian Society and later the London School of Economics (LSE) were then set up as nurseries for the future proliferation of socialist ideas and ideals throughout the English speaking world, and particularly the United States.

It is significant to our story, that Julius Wernher, of the same Wernher-Beit conglomerate that supported Milner's effort to precipitate the Anglo-Boer War, contributed substantially to the funding of the LSE, and socialist movements wherever they may have been, all vehemently 'anti-capitalist,' somewhat bewilderingly to the 'uninitiated,' received massive support from the most powerful 'capitalists.'

It was because of the absence of any fundamental antagonism between the philosophies of John Ruskin and of Karl Marx, that it was possible for the 'Brave New World' ambition, so actively promoted by Rhodes and his heirs, to be absorbed into the socialist world-power vortex with hardly a sign that anything untoward had happened.


In fact, the international socialists, instruments of the most highly concentrated financial power, were able to take over the Rhodes-Milner establishment, complete with its worldwide network of organizations - the Rhodes Scholarship Trust, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilaterals, etc - and continue to run it as if still under its original management; indeed, it simply gave the socialists a new Dimension for the exercise of their incomparable skill in the arts of deception.

The headlong decay of christianity in its orthodox forms, and particularly in its institutionalized form as the 'established' Church, proved to be overwhelmingly to the advantage of the new order of financiers.


For many centuries in the West, christian orthodoxy or Christendom, had been more than just something to believe in; it had become the world view of a whole civilization, an interpretation of the totality of existence and, as such, the very medium in which men's minds perceived reality, in the same way as the open blue skies are the medium by which birds fulfill their existence.

As that 'reality' faded, the 'shadow power' determined that the educated classes in the west would need a new religion, or even better, a secular substitute, one fully in harmony with the new rationalist climate of thought engendered by a triumphant if often erroneous science (as in Darwinism).


This substitute appeared in the form of socialism, an intellectual frame of reference and system of values which has continued to dominate higher education in the West since the beginning of the 20th century, especially in academic disciplines like history, anthropology, sociology and political science.

Socialism can be seen to have two separate and different realities:

  1. It is something that can be believed

  2. It is something that can be used.

Spengler recognized socialism's double character when he remarked that every proletarian movement, even a communist one, "Operates in the interest of money" adding significantly "without the idealist in its ranks having the slightest suspicion of the fact."

The damaging effect of socialism as an intellectual frame of reference, can be ascribed to the fact that it is basically a 'con trick,' one component of a dialectical trap with money that funds socialism as Thesis, a socialism in which men believe in as Antithesis and "The New Money Imperium, or New World Order" as Synthesis.


Money grabs and concentrates power into the centre, and socialism promises the ultimate redistribution of ownership and power; the resolution of this contradiction supplies the New Imperium or New World Order, with an almost irresistible dynamic.


The New Imperium

But the question remains; why should such an alliance of money and intellect, albeit in the service of darkly magical forces, all ostensibly bent on restructuring the world and reducing it to to a 'New Order' have produced since the 20th century so much more conflict than was seen previously, when the major nations of Europe were greedily engaged in a competitive scramble for aggrandizement, particularly in the great land grab for colonial possessions?


It would appear that money and intellect as determinants in the shaping of history, had experienced a radical change to the detriment of humankind, giving rise, among other negative phenomena, to what Professor P.T. Bauer has described as "an undeclared, one sided, fratricidal civil war in the West."

The shadow money power, being alien in philosophy, religion and method to the West, and unable to flourish in an environment of national health, strength and order, therefore committed itself to promoting and funding policies of destruction, degeneration, deprivation and degradation.


Where there is social health, strength and goodly order, in any part of the world, there is a resulting self determination, and that is an intolerable obstacle to the money's global power-concentrating purposes. Such an alien money power needs a world of ethnic communities reduced to a condition of arrested cultural and political development, and has up until very recently concentrated its enmity exclusively on Western civilization, which it still sees as its main rival for world dominion.


The 'New Imperium' finds its strength in the weakness of all those it seeks to control.

The 'New Imperium' has spread conflict and disorder trying to rule secretly and indirectly by means of artificially contrived puppet regimes, everywhere disrupting the natural hierarchical order within and between divergent ethnic groups. In other words, an extraneous power has everywhere prevented the emergence of what we would call the natural 'pecking order' within and between contiguous ethnic groups.


In fact, in very many instances, a reversal of the ancient 'pecking order' has been found necessary by the world's new secret rulers.

It is this interference in the relationships of ethnic groups, which has created an age of conflict and tragedy which is without precedent in all of world history. A process of unfolding history having as its culmination the decline of the West and a century of unprecedented conflict can be traced to many causes.

But central to all is the corrupting principle of USURY - money traded as a commodity and lent at interest - as a component of the world's monetary system.

Thus, our age of conflict, like a spiders web, has many aspects, some of them beyond our powers of understanding, but that which we need and can use is the knowledge that the peoples of the West have only themselves to blame for the plight in which they and the rest of the world find themselves today; for they have themselves created the morally unhygienic conditions in which evil flourishes as never before.



Further reading


Part 4
August 14, 2009

"The plan, I think, is the old one of world dominion in a new form... the money-power and revolutionary power have been set up and given sham but symbolic shapes ('Capitalism" or "Communism') and sharply defined citadels ('America' or "Russia')... Such is the spectacle publicly staged for the masses.


But what if similar men, with a common aim, secretly rule in both camps and propose to achieve their ambition through the clash between those masses? I believe any diligent student of our times will discover that this is the case."

- Douglas Reed


I believe that in order to more easily understand the multi faceted web that is the Luciferian Conpiracy,[2] what is needed more than anything else, is a composite overall view of the Conspirator's primary 'field of operations,' as a corrective to the present fragmentation which exists amongst the now numerous researchers operating in this particular field of enquiry.


Too often those who fight a common enemy on different fronts do not even know each other, each convinced that he alone is fighting the real battle against the real enemy; some wholly engrossed with economic and monetary issues; others with drug abuse and pornography; some convinced that any effort outside party politics is a sheer waste of time if not counter-productive; some see it as a purely cultural struggle; others as a religious struggle; and others again as a struggle that will be won or lost in the universities, etc.

On the positive side, there is good reason to believe that the problem of fragmentation is already solving itself, as different groups and individuals, defending various values, find themselves converging on a more clearly identifiable enemy. The message of the above diagram should be self-evident.


No matter how we see our own immediate battle-front, let us not forget that the ultimate enemy, the fountain-head of social and political evil in our times, is Lucifer, operating in this earthly dimension through his 'agenteurs' in the Illuminati and an illegitimate Money Power which can survive and expand only by exploiting the morally poisonous principle of usury.


Creating Illusions

The theatrical struggle between Capitalism and Communism over the inheritance of the 'bloodline' aristocracy is a diversionary front, designed to divert attention from what is in fact an ongoing fratricidal conflict between individualistic and socialist, egoist and altruist, heathen and christian ideals.


Put another way, the battle between good and evil. The 'Generals' in the make believe battle of both camps are recruited from the World's Secret Societies and Masonic Brotherhoods, who can all be canopied beneath the metaphorical tarpaulin of the Illuminati, and who are therefore aware of the agenda and complicit in the conspiracy.

Capitalism and Communism are rational, mechanical constructs; the time of the Old Military Caste nobility has passed. The effect of the 'synthesis,' and it's power, namely the belief in it, along with the hope that it's time is nearing, is now growing exponentially, and with it the audacity and arrogance of the 'New' Aristocracy.


Through their puppet politicians sitting furtively in National Parliaments, The Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations and the plethora of other 'front' organizations, their 'Project' appears close to becoming a reality, the penultimate step along the road to the New World Order.

At this point, we must examine the component parts of the above diagram in order to first identify, and then understand how the web of various intrigues tie together.


The Centre

At the centre of the conspiracy, at least on the the three dimensional level is an Illegitimate Money Power which draws its main strength from the practice of usury; a global 'Usurocracy,' which could reasonably be termed, 'The Super-capitalist-Communist-Zionist Nexus.'

The visible and discernible source of all great power since the beginning of the 20th century has been money, as opposed to other ages, where it was the possession of a superior fighting force which decided the outcome of battle.


Over the past one hundred years or so, the primary gravitational source of power, garnered from all other sources, has been the morally indefensible principle of usury, the most destructive single product of which, is the issue of money for all ordinary purposes as interest-bearing debt.

Up until the recent economic 'downturn,' and since the 1980's, banks and lenders have seemingly been falling over themselves to lend money.


Now as we try to ride out our present woes, we are told that money is scarce. Why is it scarce? Because the same people who were lending it so willingly are no longer doing so. They 'create' money as figures on a screen in the form of loans. It is money out of thin air, backed by nothing other than the people's taxes, and a belief that it exists and that it has some worth.[3]

In this way, they have enticed millions of people to sign their freedoms away for the promise of a new home, car, kitchen or bathroom. Then when the time was right, meaning now, they started calling in unpaid loans, manipulating prices, raising interest rates and destroying jobs and manufacturing production in the process.


Then, with the people in fear for their existence, and terrified of what the future might bring, demanding naively that something be done, they come up with the solution they had planned all along; More centralization of bank ownership. State and Corporate mergers through 'Government Buyout' packages and the call for a uniform across the board single global currency.

If or when the dust settles, we will see that the middle classes have been so badly damaged, that their political and economic power base will be no more. This is how 'fiefdoms' and servitude are established.



A falsified science of economics and a fraudulent monetary system

In his pamphlet, 'A Century Of Conflict' Ivor Benson writes:

"The first requirement of an illegitimate money power secretly exploiting an evil principle, advantageous to itself and antagonistic to the interest of the millions who labour to supply goods and services, would be a 'science' of economics so complicated, so labyrinthine and steeped in obscurity that it remains for vast numbers of highly intelligent and well-educated men and women an intellectual TERRA INCOGNITA. This is precisely the current state of affairs in the realms of finance.


This supposed 'science' has given rise to a monetary system progressively concentrating into ever fewer hands, producing wealth of a magnitude hitherto unimaginable, some of it in the form of money and possessions, but most of it a most oppressive lien on the productive powers of mankind - of which lien America's national debt is only a tiny portion."

Political policies inspired and informed by this pseudo-science have been carefully calculated to grind the mass of mankind to the common level of wage-slaves, preventing by a variety of means (progressive income tax, sales tax, inheritance tax, death duties, inflation, etc.) the emergence of powerful, dynamic, independent individuals capable of serving as the nuclei of a popular resistance.


The same arcane 'science' of economics prevents those who work and produce, the real generators of value, from understanding that inflation - the progressive loss in the purchasing power of money ­ is deliberate policy, being one of the unavoidable consequences of a legalized form of theft whereby governments and those most favored by governments, including the major banks, are in possession of a grossly unfair share of things of real value - that is, goods and services.

"Far worse than usury on money already in existence is fiat money, money created out of nothing, nearly always as interest- bearing debt. The final battle for christianity will be over the money problem, and until that is solved there can be no universal application of christianity."
- Balzac

Mass Media

Ownership and control of main channels of access to the public mind

(Those of you who have read my previous articles may feel I belabor this aspect of the 'control mechanism.' To those I say that this piece in the conspiratorial puzzle cannot be overemphasized, for without it, there would be no conspiracy).

A further necessary requirement, for an illegitimate money power secretly exploiting an evil, anti-social principle of conduct would be the maximum possible control of all avenues of access to the public mind - education, the newspapers and news magazines, communications technology, radio and television, the book trade, access to the public platform. I think it can fairly be agreed that has been achieved! [4]

With their unchallenged control over the mass media, the 'Lords' of money have been able to dictate what is given to the public by way of knowledge and information.


Through film, television and radio, they use subliminal messaging technology to entrap and entice people into exchanging their identities as individual human souls for that of 'consumers'. They manipulate all avenues of 'News' reporting ensuring that the 'Third Way' consensus is consolidated and maintained. The Internationalist Ideal is paramount, and our children are indoctrinated into it by the most subtle and non subtle of means.


Popular music and movies, loaded with trigger sounds and words have created a 'dumbing down' effect across the West, a phenomenon which is now being matched and even exceeded in some respects by what can be found in the same media forums in countries such as China, Japan and even India. With a owned and controlled compliant press in tow, which simply repeats and enlarges upon the lies of the Six O'clock News from the evening before, it is little wonder that the vast majority's idea of reality is totally askew.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn has encapsulated the truth about the media in two short sentences:

"Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western countries, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and the judiciary; one would like to ask: by what law has it been elected and to whom is it responsible?"

The simple answer to Solzhenitsyn's rhetorical question is that the press isn't elected at all and is answerable only to those who own it, nearly all of them sensitive to the requirements of the Illuminati money power.

And how is the control of the media exercised?

By Falsification, Misinterpretation and Suppression - the latter being perhaps the most important of all, since it needs only a small quantity of truth to overthrow a vast quantity of falsehood; not to mention Defamation which is the favorite weapon used against those who challenge the monopoly of public misinformation.

"Who ever knew truth to be put to the worse in a free and open encounter."

- John Milton

Britain's Malcolm Muggeridge puts it this way:

"Future historians will surely see us as having created in the media a Frankenstein monster which no one knows how to control or direct, and marvel that we should have so meekly subjected ourselves to its destructive and often malign influence."


The Financial Control And Manipulation Of Politics

"Democracy - two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner."

Thomas Jefferson

So with unlimited funds and the afore stated control of the mass media achieved, the next most important requirement for those wishing ultimate global hegemony, would be the control of party politics, and the parliaments which make the laws;[5] even better, the control of chief executives, presidents, dictators, etc. the majority of whom are in total thrall to the Illuminati money power, and who have here, in the first decade of the 21st Century, been largely freed from the necessity of consulting parliaments.

There are two kinds of people who do not understand that 'democracy' as practiced in most of the countries of the West is a ruse:

  1. Those who are so stupid and irresponsible that they do not even try to understand.

  2. Those who, participating in the modern party political fiasco, enjoy the patronage of their country's secret rulers.

The truly great mystery of modern politics, from the turn of the 20th century onwards, has been the relationship between Super-Capitalism, or international finance capitalism, and Marxist Socialism, or Communism.

There are two facts of history, which although not generally known are quite indisputable:

  1. The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia could never have taken place without massive financial support from the West, including Wall Street;[6]

  2. The industrial and military might of the Soviet Union was almost entirely a creation of Western high finance and big business, especially American.[5]

The Financial control and manipulation of politics along with the concerted undermining of private enterprise capitalism, combined with a progressive program of State interference in all aspects of private commerce, and life generally, has all but destroyed the once proud and independent feature of the Western way of life.


Throughout the so-called free or 'non-socialist' world, insidious motives have been powerfully at work during the greater part of this and the last century, systematically undermining the private-enterprise capitalist system, replacing it, piece by piece, with elements of pure socialism. Not surprisingly, therefore, most Western governments can be seen to be implementing in all kinds of ways Karl Marx's own ten points of policy calculated to bring the whole world under an Illuminati controlled Socialist Imperium.[7]

What this means, quite simply, is that in the West the method of socialist revolution by stealth had been chosen, as being more likely to succeed, in preference to violent revolution as used in Russia and elsewhere.[8]


There can be no doubt, therefore, that those who control finance capitalism in its greatest concentrations, often with governments as their main clients, saw instantly in the Marxist doctrine an ingenious method of converting great money power into political power, while at the same time harnessing to their purpose all the energies of super-capitalism's potentially most dangerous opponents, the intellectuals. For Marxism gave them the means of presenting, in idealistic and ideological disguise, motives of gross power appetite which, for obvious reasons, cannot bear exposure.


This helps to explain why the politics of the super-rich is invariably leftist, or socialist, and why their animosity is concentrated against conservatives who, among other things, are dedicated to the preservation of free-enterprise capitalism.


The Third Way

"The Illuminati's 'revolutionary goal' is the New World Order, or authoritarian socialism run by monopoly capital. It is big government in the service of big business. The Left in the service of the Right".

Henry Makow Ph.D.

One of the fundamental objectives of those pushing for a 'New World Order,' is the absolute social, personal and economic control over what's left of humanity, (following any global conflagration) in a collectivist and corporatist society.


The political philosophy behind the NWO exemplifies a convenient (for the Illuminists) mixture of Capitalism and Communism - a form of Neo-Marxism which owes much of its dogma to the Pre World War II Italian Marxist Philosopher, Antonio Gramsci.


Tony Blair called it the 'Third Way,' but it should more correctly be referred to as 'Communitarianism.'

We are talking of a dialectical trap here,[9] with Corporate money funding Socialism as Thesis, ideological Socialism as Antithesis and Communitarianism or the 'New Imperium' as Synthesis. Money grabs and concentrates power, whilst State Socialism promises the total redistribution of ownership and wealth. This contradiction provides the Illuminati architects and planners with an almost irresistible dynamic.

Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state. Can anyone deny that their goals are firmly on course.

Vaclav Klaus, the renegade (in EU terms) President of the Czech republic defines Communitarianism thus:

"Communitarianism is a collectivist philosophy that explicitly rejects individualism. It does not merely relegate individualism to a subordinate position, but is openly hostile to it. It is an ideology of 'civic society' which is nothing less than one version of Post-Marxist collectivism which wants privileges for certain wealthy and influential organized groups, and in consequence, a renewed feudalizing of society."

Once the spotlight of investigation is shone directly upon the political machinations of the 'One Worlders,' what emerges is a Luciferian Communitarian Agenda, which on the temporal level at least can be seen to be driven solely by corporate interests.


Monetary Profit is to be the 'bottom line' on everything from public services to defense to the very useful environmental 'Trojan Horse.' High sounding 'non descriptions' precede cleverly worded specifics that determine that the one and only benchmark be an economic one.

Nikki Raapana,[10] who has researched Communitarianism extensively describes it's 'Modus Operandi' this way:

"The 'Communitarians work behind the scenes. Elite communitarian 'thinkers' quietly slide their new laws inside projects and programs few regular people will think or dare to question. And, just so you won't look any closer, (or open your mouth to ask one dumb question) the Communitarians mask their fascist programs behind all kinds of lovely phrasing.


The new phrases work so well that if you do stand out and speak up with a debatable question, it means you don't want to live in a safe and healthy community.


And since everyone has to agree in order to reach communitarian consensus, you will be shunned and excluded from the decision making 'councils.' Go ahead and try, but the shifty Communitarians will NEVER debate you because their programs are based entirely in a lie called Communism."


Foreign Policy

"In some ways ...[Julia]... was far more acute than Winston, and far less susceptible to Party propaganda. Once when he happened in some connection to mention the war against Eurasia, she startled him by saying casually that in her opinion the war was not happening. The rocket bombs which fell daily on London were probably fired by the Government of Oceania itself, 'just to keep people frightened'.


This was an idea that had literally never occurred to him. She also stirred a sort of envy in him by telling him that during the Two Minutes Hate her great difficulty was to avoid bursting out laughing."

- George Orwell, 1984.[11]

Governments and tyrants have ever used the threat, whether real or imagined, of an external enemy, to justify the subjugation of populations. Nothing has changed except the diabolical ingenuity of the manipulators. In fact, we have entered a new 'Dark Age' of Totalitarianism, where democratically elected governments, lie, cheat, steal from and even bomb and murder their own people, all the time working towards the common goal of World Domination.

Prior to the events on September 11th 2001, it would be hard to imagine any worldwide news blackout to compare with the suppression of information about the transfer of Western wealth and technology to the Soviet Union during what was spuriously termed the 'Cold War.' [5]


A few sentences from a statement made by Dr. Antony Sutton on 15 August 1972, before one of the sub-committees of the Republican Party at Miami Beach, Florida, and TOTALLY BLACKED OUT by the wire services and the media, will have to suffice:

"In a few words, there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all - perhaps 90-95 percent came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect, the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union, its industrial capabilities and its military power. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plant, equipment and technical assistance".

The details, fully documented, can be found in the massive three- volume series, 'Western Technology And Soviet Economic Development,' which Dr. Sutton produced for the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, California.


Another aspect of foreign policy which places an oppressive burden on those who work and produce, mostly in the form of taxation and inflation, is so-called "foreign aid" (or 'aid to under-developed countries,' or 'less developed countries'), which Professor P.T. Bauer, of the London School of Economics, has correctly described as,

"a gigantic confidence trick which impoverishes the poor in the developed countries and enriches the rich in the under-developed countries."


"In this way, an illegitimate money power further enriches itself and promotes political purposes which bring no advantage whatever to those who work and produce. Some of these groups envisage the Third World as a weapon in what is in effect an undeclared, one-sided civil war in the West. Some of these groups have consistently and effectively promoted the cause of wealth transfers from the West."

- P.T. Bauer

In September 2000, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), [12] a neo-conservative think-tank, with strong ties to the right-wing American Enterprise Institute, and funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil and weapons and defense industries, drafted a plan for global domination.


The project's participants included individuals who would play leading roles in the second Bush administration: Vice President Cheney, of the CFR and a Trilateralist, secretary of defense Rumsfeld, a Bilderberger, and his deputy Wolfowitz, also a Bildeberger. Several of PNAC members, including Cheney, Khalilzad and the Bush family, all have ties to the oil industry.

These PNAC signatories represent a core group of Neo-conservatives, who are believed to have actually dictated the policies of the Bush administration. They are called "neo-conservatives" because many of them started off as anti-Stalinist leftists or liberals, before moving to the far right.


Others include

  • Elliott Abrams, National Security Council staffer

  • Douglas Feith, of the Pentagon

  • Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Cheney's chief of staff

  • John R. Bolton, of the State Department

Outside the administration, are:

  • James Woolsey, former CIA director

  • Richard Perle, nicknamed the "Prince of Darkness"

The nation of Israel is of major concern to these neo-conservatives, and many of them have continuing ties to it.


As political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg puts it:

"One major factor that drew them inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights].


In the Reaganite right's hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel's security"

Titled, Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, the PNAC report envisioned an expanded global military role for the U.S., by stipulating:

"The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

However, it added,

"even should Saddam pass from the scene," the plan states, U.S. military bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain, despite domestic opposition in the Gulf states to the permanent stationing of U.S. troops. Iran, it says, "may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests as Iraq has."

A "core mission" for the U.S. military, according to the PNAC, is to,

"fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars".

The "transformation" of the U.S. military into an imperialistic force of global domination would require a massive increase in defense spending, to,

"a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually," the PNAC plan said.


"The process of transformation," the plan further clarifies, "is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor."

September 11th 2001 offered the opportunity to finally embark upon the ultimate plan devised by Albert Pike [13], and articulated more recently by Samuel Huntington in his book, a 'Clash of Civilizations, A Global War Against Islam.'


As William Engdahl pointed out,

"if the Bush administration had been unprepared for the shock of September 11, 2001, they certainly wasted no time in preparing their response, the war on terror. Terror was to replace communism as the new global image of "the enemy".

On September 18, 2001, Niaz Niak, former Pakistani foreign secretary, told the BBC he had been informed by senior US officials at a mid-July Berlin meeting that "military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October."


Ultimately, the invasion of Afghanistan was a furtherance of the initial plans devised by Zbigniew Brzezinski [14] to gain control over Central Asia.

In is book, 'The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives,' Brzezinski put forward a vision of creating a "global-zone of percolating violence," leading to the break-up of the Middle East, into a mosaic of competing factions, and weakening the authority of existing republics and kingdoms, that could then be skillfully manipulated to inhibit the integration of the Central Asian states.

According to 'The Grand Chessboard,' a map of this zone of "percolating violence" encompasses all of Central Asia, extending westward to include Turkey, northward to include southern Russia, and eastward to the western borders of China. It includes the entire Middle East, where Brzezinski claims it is imperative for the US to retain control, especially in the critical Persian Gulf. And, the zone extends eastward to include Afghanistan and Pakistan, up to the latter's border with India.


Brzezinski had, in turn, been seduced by Bernard Lewis, into believing that Islamic fundamentalism could be played as a "geo-strategic" card to destabilize the USSR. (The recent troubles in Ossetia are just the 'opening shots' of what is to come.)

This strategy would be achieved by employing all the covert means made available through Illuminati channels, and with the CIA again exploiting the services of the Muslim Brotherhood
[15], to foment revolution and thereby defame the image of Islam in the West. Despite all their posturing as defenders of orthodoxy, the Muslim Brotherhood are using the pretext of seeking to implement the global 'caliphate,' or muslim ruler, to seek the destruction of Middle Eastern societies, to conspire with the Illuminati towards the implementation of a New World Order, based on occult principles.

According to David Livingstone in his epic book, 'Terrorism And The Illuminati,' [15] the script goes something like this:

'World War Three is to be fomented by riling the masses of the West against the world of Islam, through the misconception that it is a brutal, retarded medieval religion, contrary to the values of rights and freedoms which have taken the West centuries to hone.


The means of arousing the rest of the world's animosity against the religion of Islam as tyrannical was orchestrated initially with the installation of the Ayatollah in Iran.


Following the installation of the Ayatollah, covert support of the war in Afghanistan, leading to the installation of the Taliban regime, would contribute to destroying the Soviet Union, thus liberating Central Asia for conquest, and leaving the Illuminati with one final last enemy in its quest for global hegemony, Islam, as pronounced by Albert Pike.'



"The art of music above all the other arts is the expression of the soul of a nation, and by a nation I mean... any community of people who are spiritually bound together by language, environment, history, and common ideals and, above all, a continuity with the past."
- Vaughan Williams

In his pamphlet, 'A Century Of Conflict,' Ivor Benson asks the question:

"What more is needed to give an illegitimate money power the security it needs?"

The Answer: 'Quite a lot,' as we shall see.


The subversion of national culture, including literature, art, music and the undermining of institutions and traditions, church, family and morality were considered prerequisites. Only by severing the people's roots to these aspects of national life could the conspiratorial goals be realized.


Organ-transplant surgeons encounter a problem called 'rejection' - which means that the living organism is programmed by nature to reject anything that does not truly belong; and the surgeon's answer to "rejection" is immuno-suppressive drugs, which have the effect or reducing the organism's vitality. Likewise, before a population can be made to tolerate a system, or an ordering of its existence, which it is instinctively programmed to reject, means must be found to reduce it to a condition of attenuated vitality.

Winston Churchill showed his understanding of this when he wrote back in 1922 that there could be no World Government as envisaged by Marxists except on the basis of an induced state of universal arrested development. Since the end of WWII, the peoples of the West (and subsequently the rest of humankind) have been, through various means, reduced to exactly that state.


This has been achieved via a diabolical program of culture distortion, using subversive genre's of popular music, ever more degrading and perverse forms of pornography, theatre and cinema themes which distort reality and show an inverted and corrupted ideal of all that is natural, moral and good, together with the encouragement of decadence in every possible form. In other words, 'Culture Distortion.'

Briefly put, the substitution of a people's own indigenous culture with toxic forms of 'entertainment' contrived to instill confusion on a mass scale, and paralyze the collective will at source.


This undermining and subversion of the culture is openly promoted and encouraged by the media whores of the New Imperium, with the most degraded, drug addicted so called 'artists' being touted as role models for our ever more, and tragically so, depraved youth.



The falsification of science, especially anthropology and psychology

Science itself must be controlled and manipulated if it is to be prevented from placing obstacles in the path of the Illuminati imperialism of illegitimate money power.


Truth in some of the academic disciplines ­ like mathematics, physics, chemistry, geology, etc. - these the money power needs and must have, for obvious reasons; what it does not want and must exclude at any price is truth which explains mankind to itself, truth that liberates and strengthens. Scientific truths about the movement of heavenly bodies in renaissance times were never more effectively falsified or suppressed than are the genuine products of scientific inquiry today in all those disciplines which explore man himself: anthropology, ethnology, genetics, psychology, history ­ to name only a few.

The suppression and falsification, and attendant defamation of those who refuse to submit, can be traced back to their source in the money power, which finally decides who shall be appointed to a university teaching post and who shall not, whose work shall be published and whose condemned to neglect and oblivion.


Thus, instead of the honest anthropology of men like Professor Carleton Coon, Sir Arthur Keith, Do. John Baker, we have the fraudulent psychology of men like Carl Gustav Jung, William James, Thomas Szasz, H.J. Eysenck, along with the vindictive, anti- Western and anti-christian swindle of Sigmund Freud.

"Modern psychotherapy is not merely a religion that pretends to be a science, it as actually a fake religion that seeks to destroy true religion."

- Thomas Szasz



Falsification and suppression of history

Can people be fully and accurately informed about what has happened in the past without being strengthened in their ability to cope with the present? Of course not!


It goes without saying that the falsification and suppression of news goes hand-in hand with the falsification and suppression of history, especially of recent history - since, obviously, people will lose all confidence in the media if they discover today that they were lied to or prevented from getting at the truth five, ten or twenty years ago. The control of written history - historiography - has become a major feature of modern political warfare, in which it is those who don't know or are wrongly informed who are overthrown.

Unless we know what happened in the past we cannot know what is happening now - for it is only what happened in the past that gives meaning to much of what is happening now. And if we don't know what happened in the past and is happening now, we have no way of helping to determine what will happen in the future, for ourselves as individuals and for our community.


Hence, as George Orwell puts it:

"Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past".

Control of the study of history in our time, especially the history of our age, is exercised also by means of a system of intellectual terrorism designed to suppress information of the kind that arms us in our minds against an enemy whose great power in the world is little more than a power to deceive.



Incitement and support of internal communist revolutionary activity

There can be few better examples, where the nexus between the Capitalist super-rich and a Marxist-Communist, supposedly anti-capitalist, revolutionary underground had been more clearly established than in pre- majority rule South Africa.


Similarly, there must be few places where it has been easier to study that uneasy alliance of the circumcised and the uncircumcised - the excluded, using their great newspaper chains and media outlets, to give the maximum of sympathetic publicity to a communist revolutionary underground that has always been overwhelmingly jewish at the leadership level.


The support which the South relied on to give the leftist radicals was acknowledged in one short sentence from communist underground leader Abram Fischer:

"Our press has done a wonderful job!"

This statement, which formed part of one of Fischer's regular analyses of the revolutionary situation, clearly referred to the local 'capitalist" newspapers and reflected no more than what any intelligent observer could see for himself.

The nexus between super-capitalism and communism was more difficult to conceal in South Africa than in most other countries, for the reason that in South Africa there was no proletariat of the kind to be found in most other industrially developed countries, no underworld of snarling and envious drop-outs, no proletariat as prescribed by Marxist doctrine and Leninist revolutionary science.


Therefore, communist revolution had to take the form of a 'Black Nationalist' exercise.

Investigations have fully exposed unbroken lines of communication and funding between the revolutionary underground in South Africa and all the centers of great financial and political power outside South Africa - on both sides of the Iron and Bamboo Curtains.


In hindsight, we can regard the 'undeclared' war waged by the Illuminists against South Africa as only one small part in what Professor Bauer called "an undeclared and one-sided civil war in the West" - a war which was and is aimed not only at white people in South Africa but at all ethnic entities and their cultures wherever they may be.

"There is only one world-revolution in progress, no matter from what quarter being promoted and directed, and all peoples of Western European provenance, wherever they may live, are as much the targets and intended victims of the revolution as the South Africans.


The West has been crippled by a corrosive and corrupt ideology-morality that causes our political-intellectual elites to declare themselves in sympathy with and in support of the very elements that boldly proclaim their goal to be the destruction of the West."

- Richard Clark


"christianity holds at its core a symbol which has for its content the individual way of life of a man, the Son of Man, and it even regards this individuation process as the incarnation and revelation of God himself."

- C.G. Jung

The faith of the West was de-constructed in part by the Illuminati 'Money Power' providing massive financial support for aberrant trends which have the effect of secularizing and politicizing religion.


There can be no doubt that the greatest possible source of resistance to illegitimate power is to be found in a people's religion, whose central purpose it is to give the individual a spiritual and intellectual form base from which to make relative all the pressures and influences he encounters, and secure a deep-rooted sense of purpose and direction.


Thus, religion, by whatever name it is called, must always be at the core of a people's culture, nourished by and giving nourishment to all the arts. From which it follows that religious error must have the most destructive consequences when exploited by powers whose purposes are anything but religious.

It is all the more so when the error is of a kind which, like today's social gospel heresy, defeats religion's central purpose, and substitutes for inner illumination a set of spurious brain-spun 'ideals' indistinguishable from those which activate Marxist trade union leaders and unscrupulous politicians.


The result has been a secularization and politicization of christianity in the West, with the setting-up, at very great cost, of a worldwide organization centered on the World Council of Churches.

To borrow an expression from the American poet Ezra Pound,

"there is no mediaeval description of hell which exceeds the inner filth of the mentalities of some of the ministers and prelates for whom every species of cruelty and villainy is condoned, even incited, if perpetrated under the banner of universalist political objectives prescribed by the money power.


Not surprisingly, these same churchmen can be relied on to block 'by diseased will or sodden inertia' (Ezra Pound's words) any cleansing of a monetary system that gives to them so much power and importance; they will quote you the Bible on every sin in the calendar but never against the fountain-head of every species of sin - the practice of usury."

Two world religions, christianity and islam stand between Lucifer and his goal of world rule.[16]


Christianity has been under sustained attack for two centuries at least and is badly mauled and debilitated. Now the flow of evil emanating from the 'Centre' is being aimed at islam.

Freemason Albert Pike revealed how this was to be done in the letter he wrote Giuseppe Mazzini August 15,1871, the text of which can and should be read in 'Part Three' of this series.

I ask the reader to study every word of this diabolically inspired document. According to Pike's military blueprint, drawn up between 1859 and 1871, three global wars and three major revolutions were to place the High Priests of the Luciferian Creed in position to usurp world powers. Two World Wars have been fought according to schedule.


The Russian and Chinese revolutions have achieved success. Communism has been built up in strength and Christendom weakened. World War Three is now in the making. If it is allowed to break out, all remaining nations will be further weakened, and Islam and political Zionism will be destroyed as world powers.

The reader must not forget that the Arab world alone is made up of millions of people, many of whom are christians; many are of the jewish faith; many are muslims, but all subscribe to belief in the same God christians worship as the creator of the universe.


The Quran of the Islamic faith is in spirit and essence a divinely inspired continuation of the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, excepting that the muslim religion, while accepting Jesus Christ as the greatest of God's prophets before Mohammed, does not permit its members to believe in the divinity of Christ.

Those who direct the Luciferian conspiracy at the top realize only too well that before they can provoke the final social cataclysm, they must first of all bring about the destruction of Islam as a world power, because if Islam were not destroyed, it might eventually ally itself with christianity in the event of an all out war with the forces of the Illuminati.


If that were allowed to happen, the balance of power would shift in favor of the 'Righteous Alliance' established finally, by the coming together of christianity and islam.

It is of the greatest of importance that these facts, which explain the political intrigue and chicanery now going on in the near, middle, and far East, be brought to the attention of all the good people of our world, whatever their background, so they may take action to prevent the last phases of the Luciferian conspiracy from being put into effect.

If there is a Third World War, I believe that a likely scenario is that the United States will be the only remaining world military power, albeit a degraded and depleted one. Then, the remains of the world's population, exhausted and terrorized by a war unlike any other, will clamor for, and demand a world government, so that 'it could never happen again.'


And they will get it if the Luciferian conspiracy is allowed to be developed to its intended conclusion. Then, through the auspices of the United Nations, a puppet 'Priest King' of the 'Royal Blood' [17] who many believe is already waiting in the wings, will be made 'World Ruler,' though under the malevolent influence and direction of the 'agentura' of the Illuminati, who will have been appointed, not elected, to be his 'Specialists,' 'Experts,' and 'Advisors.'

The High Priests of the Luciferian Creed know they cannot usurp world authority power before the United States is ruined as the last remaining 'superpower,' so those who direct the Global Conspiracy at the 'capstone level' are arranging matters so the United States will, as Lenin stated,

"Fall into our hands like an overripe fruit."

This is how those events taking place today indicate clearly that the subjugation of the U.S.A. is planned.

The Communist-Super-Capitalist-Zionist Nexus:

"The world is governed by very different persons to what is imagined by those who are not themselves behind the scene."

- Benjamin Disraeli British Prime Minister To Queen Victoria.

Even a cursory investigation of the forces shaping our current woeful situation, creating a socio-political climate described by 'Spengler' as "Anarchy become a habit" would be incomplete, without a more informed look at those two supposed 'arch' opposites, Capitalism and Communism.


The key word here is Capitalism. This oft used word actually has two very divergent meanings.

Most people make the mistake of supposing that the word capitalism means one thing; in fact, the word as commonly used has two sets of meaning, as different as oil and water.


If we are to understand why governments representing capitalist states adopt the most inexplicably ambivalent attitudes towards communism, we must first learn to separate in our minds the two sets of meaning which that one word capitalism has been called on to represent.

  1. Capitalism, meaning private ownership of property and resources and competitive free enterprise in the supply of goods and services.

  2. Super-Capitalism, meaning a highly concentrated finance capitalism which is not only apart from capitalism, but it's antithesis and which sooner rather than later acquires the characteristic of being actively 'anti-capitalist'.

It is not possible to continue to concentrate ownership and control of property and resources without simultaneously reducing the number who own and control said property and resources.


Similarly, there can be no concentration of Corporate Ownership and control, without a corresponding inhibition and suppression of free enterprise.


What we have seen in the West is a progressive degeneration of capitalism into a form of super-capitalism, or anti-capitalism, which the less it resembles the original capitalism the more it resembles socialism, or communism.

In other words, the weak and struggling capitalism that survives, serves merely as a camouflage for an all- powerful anti-capitalism which dominates both economics and politics. Modern super-capitalist regimes like that of the United States, and communist regimes like that of the former Soviet Union, have their differences and their oppositions of interest but these are unimportant when compared with what they have in common. Both are irreconcilably antagonistic towards nationalism. Therefore, both are essentially revolutionary, having set themselves in fierce antagonism towards those political forms which are essentially evolutionary.

Nationalism, a much maligned and misrepresented political credo is inseparably connected to a people's culture and traditions. This causes it to become the mortal enemy of the 'Supra-nationalists' whose goal is the Super-state.


Since Nationalism is so inseparably joined to a people's cultural heritage, it follows that all attacks on nationalism must include cultural sabotage and subversion - which is what we have seen happening on both sides of the Iron and Bamboo Curtains, promoted with equal zeal by super-capitalists and communists.

There is only one genuine form of nationalism they (The Illuminati) support and that is Zionism,[18] which is an internationally dispersed Jewish nationalism. Of course, they also support other forms of spurious models of 'nationalism' which they themselves set up and use, like 'Black Nationalism' in Africa for example, and even these, are invariably heavily laced with Marxism. The reason why Western super-capitalism lives in constant dread of nationalism can be easily explained: The fundamental issue in any state is whether or not there shall be an authority superior to economics.


Which shall rule - politics or economics? And there can be no doubt that nationalism, in spite of all the ailments to which it is heir, energized by the instincts and will of the population, means that politics is the master and that economics, no matter how important it may be, has been relegated to its proper and natural subordinate status.

Since there is no way in which communism can be effectively resisted and defeated except by nationalism, it follows that super-capitalism is totally committed to co-existence with communism, and that super-capitalism can have no other long range aim except that of ultimate convergence with communism in the shape of Tony Blair's 'Third Way' or Communitarianism.


Likewise - and this is most important - there is only one political weapon that super-capitalism can use against nationalism, and that is a communist or rather communitarian ideology that marshals the forces of the underworld and of rootless intellectualism, holding them ready to be aimed like a siege cannon against any nationalist target.

An all-important factor with a binding and directing influence on all the other components of the 20th century world-revolution is that of Zionism[18], which can be described as a geographically dispersed but intensely united and passionately motivated Jewish nationalism. Paradoxically the Jewish people have come to the fore as a dominant influence in world affairs at a time when most Jews attach little or no importance to a religion which for close on two millennia was a powerful binding force.


Professor Hannah Arendt puts it this way:

"Twentieth century political developments have driven the Jewish people into the storm centre of events".

The developments she describes correspond with the consolidation of Jewish power and influence on a global basis, a process that has continued at an accelerating pace since the turn of the century.


The essentially nationalistic character of Zionism is frankly admitted by Jewish scholar Gideon Shimoni, who writes:

"Zionism embodies a progressive nationalism comparable with socialism according to the formula 'Socialist in content and nationalist in form'".

As Ivor Benson questions, "What is that, if not National Socialism?"

"The world-revolution can thus be described as a struggle in which one powerful nation is bent on the overthrow of all other nations. No one must lightly dismiss the question of race; it is the key to world history and it is precisely for this reason that written history so often lacks clarity - it is written by people who do not understand the race question, and what belongs to it."

- Benjamin Disrael


Conclusion To Part Four

In 1979 the Mullahs in Iran (backed by MI6, CIA and funded by the 'Money Power') overthrew the Persian monarchy, one of the oldest in the world, while at the height of its power, replacing it with an Islamic Republic ostensibly dedicated to the implementation of the Sharia, a law of private and public conduct prescribed in the Quran.


Since then hardly a day has passed without news involving Islam, hitting the international headlines; ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the conflict in Palestine, troubles in several former Soviet republics with Islamic majorities or minorities, and a seemingly endless conflict in Kashmir.

In the wake of the 'False Flag' attack on the Twin Towers almost eight years ago, the world has changed so as to be barely recognisable to this writer.


The 'War On Terror,' a war without end, we are told, is the likely precursor to a global conflagration of catastrophic proportions, and all gun sights appear to be now aimed at islam.



5] Dr. Kitty Little - Treason At Westminster.

8] Frankfurt School
9] Hegelian Dialectic
15] David Livingstone


Return to The Illuminati

Return to The Global Elite

Return to Temas / Sociopolitica