|
This is not news to most people in the liberty movement that have been tracking the downward spiral for years, but it is news to a majority of average Americans who rarely venture to get in-depth information on any issue.
The fact of the matter
is, even though there are millions of us who are aware of the
danger, we are still in a minority.
How can they see the root
of the problem if they don't even know the problem is there?
The globalist agenda is complicated in design but simple in its goals: Order out of chaos. Create or exploit every crisis to manipulate the public into consenting.
But consent for what?
As Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations under Kennedy and Johnson, and a member of the Trilateral Commission, wrote in the April, 1974 issue of the Council on Foreign Relation's (CFR) journal Foreign Affairs (pg. 558) in an article titled 'The Hard Road to World Order':
Global pandemic, whether a natural event or deliberately engineered, actually serves the purposes of the globalist establishment in a number of ways.
First and foremost, it is a superb distraction.
The general public, overcome with fears of an invisible force of nature that can possibly kill them at any moment, will probably forget all about the much bigger threat to their life, liberty and future - the subsequent collapse of the massive 'Everything Bubble' and the globalist "solution" that a pandemic can trigger.
The coronavirus is only a moderate threat in comparison to economic crisis.
That said, I want to confront a few issues concerning the virus itself before we get to the economic question.
Virus Disinformation
I have seen a lot of delusional assumptions and outright disinformation being spread by people in regards to this potential pandemic.
First, the notion that it was caused by Chinese citizens "eating bats" or being exposed to a live animal market is rather ridiculous.
We've seen NO hard evidence whatsoever that this is true, and I believe the narrative is a cover for the fact that the city of Wuhan where the virus outbreak began is the home of not one but TWO level 4 biohazard labs.
I have a hard time ignoring the strange "coincidence" of the high level biohazard labs in Wuhan in favor of the idea that the virus was launched by chance due to the odd diets of central Chinese people.
Given the evidence it appears that the coronavirus was gestated in a lab, not in someone's bat and snake soup. In 2017, scientists outside of China warned that these labs were not secure and that a virus might escape one of the facilities.
I would use the term "escape" loosely, as there is a possibility that this event was created intentionally.
The virus itself has certain hallmarks of being engineered (including its long dormant period without visible symptoms) and the current strain is probably derived from the one the Chinese stole a year ago from a lab in Winnipeg, Canada.
But it gets even weirder.
Only three months ago,
...ran a "pandemic simulation" called "Event 201" specifically focused on Coronavirus.
The simulation features the spread of coronavirus in South America, blamed on animal to human transmission (pigs).
Some very disingenuous or perhaps rather stupid people have been arguing that this kind of thing is "normal", claiming that we are "lucky" that the elites have been running simulations in advance in order to "save us" from a coronavirus outbreak.
I assert that Event 201 was not a simulation but a war-game to study the possible outcomes of an event the globalists already knew was coming.
Set aside the fact that before almost every major crisis event and terrorist attack for the past few decades authorities were running simulations for that exact event right before it happened,
Another false assumption that needs to be addressed is the idea that a viral threat will not strike the West, or at least, not the US.
This odd bias is one that I don't think most cultures except Americans suffer from:
From the responses I have been seeing lately many Americans are living in a fantasy world.
Even now, the investment world is placing full stock and hope in the prediction that the Federal Reserve will step in to disrupt any economic downturn related to the pandemic.
Even if the FED intended to intervene,
Central Banks can do nothing but create debt, and debt will not beat back the coronavirus...
In terms of delusional optimism on the pandemic itself, the arguments range from,
This is a narrow view of the situation.
The screening process is terrible, and usually involves basic questions which can be evaded with lies.
But beyond that, the virus is already here. It was circulating through China for at least a few weeks before it was ever addressed by government authorities or the CDC.
It also is reported to be asymptomatic, which means it remains dormant, yet also contagious, for up to two weeks before symptoms become visible.
This is a far worse scenario than the ebola scare in 2014, in that the coronavirus is able to hide effectively.
The only thing that can be done to slow the spread is to shut down ALL international travel, which the CDC and the WHO have no intention of doing right now, not that it matters anymore with over 110 suspected cases in the US already.
So, let's be realistic:
Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste...
But what do globalists have to gain directly from a coronavirus pandemic beyond simple chaos that can be exploited?
Interestingly, a representative from Johnson and Johnson, one of the companies that may end up designing a "vaccine" for the Cronavirus, suggested during Event 201 that a "centralized" global economic authority in charge of funding and procuring vaccines for various nations in crisis was an option for solving the pandemic.
Gee, that sounds strangely similar to what globalists have been demanding for many years now, and the pandemic just happens to offer a perfect excuse for the creation of such a one-world financial authority.
They might claim that such a system would be temporary according to the life of the pandemic, but this will be a lie.
In terms of the economic effects, even if the virus were to stay primarily in China, the Chinese economy is, in basic terms, the largest in the world; it is the biggest exporter/importer and it is central to the now interdependent global economy.
If China's economy goes down, even for a short time, this will send shockwaves through all other national economies and supply lines.
In May of last year I published an article titled 'Globalists Only Need One More Major Event to Finish Sabotaging the Economy'.
To summarize the situation:
The reason why globalists want a collapse is simple:
At the very least, a global pandemic is a useful happenstance for them.
But the timing of the coronavirus event and their highly accurate "simulation" only three months ago also suggests their potential involvement, as it comes right as the implosion of the Everything Bubble was accelerating.
Consider this:
If it does kill a large number of people, and if the Chinese government's response is any indication, it could result in global martial law.
With many economies including the US economy already in a precarious balancing act of historic debt vs. crashing demand and useless central bank repo market intervention, there is little chance that the system can withstand such a tsunami.
Make no mistake, the crash has already begun, whether the virus hits the US hard or not.
The only question is,
I took my time in publishing this article because I believed it was important to first watch the Chinese, CDC and WHO response to the virus.
If they dealt with the situation quickly then there was a chance that it would have only minor influence on the financial system. They did not deal with the situation quickly or decisively.
In fact, over 5 million people left the Hubei region of China before active quarantine and treatment procedures began.
The situation has spiraled out of control in China and it is clear that the government is now lying through its teeth about the number of sick and dead.
I would not be surprised if we discover in the next two weeks that the death tally is in the thousands, and the sickness rate is actually in the hundreds of thousands.
The fact that China has now quarantined over 50 million people in 16 cities suggests the danger is much higher than they have admitted.
If this is the case, then at the very least, the Chinese economy is about to take a massive hit. If the virus doesn't spread, the economic damage will.
Pandemic Smokescreen, Economic Collapse And "Climate Change"
Look at it this way:
If Trump continues tariffs against a nation in the state of a viral emergency he will look like a monster (which I believe is his job as a globalist puppet pretending to be a conservative nationalist).
In the meantime, global trade becomes muddled and the last structural supports of the system snap in half.
With global supply lines frozen and travel eventually restricted, trade will stall.
In the wake of calamity, the globalists will call for even MORE interdependency.
Another advantage of the viral crisis is that the establishment will undoubtedly blame the "climate change" and "global warming" hoax for its impetus.
Even though there is absolutely no concrete evidence linking human carbon emissions to climate change or viral outbreaks, given enough public fear globalists will attempt to link the three things together as if it is a proven fact.
Not only will they have a rationale for an economic collapse THEY created, but they can also present a virus engineered by humans in a lab as an "act of nature", and use it as a rationale for implementing carbon controls...
|
