by Rhoda Wilson
The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations
("IHRs") and the Pandemic Treaty both incorporate the "One Health" approach.
This is deliberate and in
the same vein as tactics used by governments during the
Covid era to
keep populations confused and so more likely to blindly follow
instructions.
Once central power has been achieved then similar measures that were imposed in response to the Covid "pandemic" can be used for,
...and more.
Where will the power and control be centralized?
That One Health is incorporated into WHO's global dictatorship plans has almost slipped under the radar, but some researchers such as Dr. Meryl Nass have noticed, investigated and are trying to inform others.
One of the biggest changes WHO has seen in its 75-year history is a shift from funding from sovereign nations to funding from private parties.
As of now, the bulk of the WHO's funding comes from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and two closely aligned vaccine-based non-profits funded by vaccine and pharma companies, There's no hiding the incestuous interconnection between various governments and organizations including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum ("WEF").
WHO's "Pandemic Treaty" will not only be concerned with pandemics.
It introduces globally the "One Health" ideology.
Through this One Health agenda, WHO will have the power to make decisions in matters relating to the,
With these extended powers, WHO could readily declare a climate or environmental emergency and enforce lockdowns.
Not only is One Health included in the Pandemic Treaty, but it is also in the proposed amendments to the IHRs which are being negotiated at the 76th World Health Assembly this week.
On Monday, the host of the Dutch podcast Voorwaarheid (English 'Video Truth') Willem Engel interviewed Dr. Meryl Nass about One Health and how it has spread and is being used for a hidden agenda.
Dr. Nass has published several articles about One Health on her Substack page HERE.
One Health was a concept some doctors and veterinarians came up with about 20 years ago. International organizations and self-appointed elites hijacked the idea to use it as a means of gaining power and control over most of the world, Dr. Meryl Nass told Engel.
As a result, the "basket of items" that could be included in the One Health concept has continued to expand.
There have been at least 60 different definitions of "One Health."
Dr. Nass read out a few. You can read these on the first two pages of the slides that accompany her interview HERE.
According to the most recent and authoritative definition, One Health includes not only people and animals, as was the original concept 20 years ago, but it now also includes plants, waterways and ecosystems.
The One Health Commission claims that One Health is a,
The four lead agencies underlying One Health are WHO and three UN agencies:
The One Health approach is built into the proposed amendments to the IHRs that are currently on the table.
Some of the amendments are likely to be voted on at the World Health Assembly this week and the remainder in May 2024.
During the second half of the interview, Dr. Nass and Engel had an interesting discussion about the origins of the "pandemic."
It's well worth the listen...
Right2Freedom: One World – One Health
Further resources
|