by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 01, 2023
World Health Organization is seeking to cement its
control over global health through amendments to the
international health regulations (IHR) and its
'pandemic' treaty will grant the WHO power over far more
than 'pandemic' responses. It emphasizes the "One Health"
agenda, which combines human health, animal health and
environmental concerns into one
Under the One Health agenda, the WHO would have power to
make decisions relating to diet, agriculture and
livestock farming, environmental pollution, movement of
populations and much more
Private interests wield immense power over the WHO, and
a majority of the funding is "specified," meaning it's
earmarked for particular programs. The WHO cannot
allocate those funds wherever they're needed most. This
too massively influences what the WHO does and how it
does it. So, the WHO is an organization that does
whatever its funders tell it to do
globalist takeover hinges on the successful creation of
a feedback loop of surveillance for virus variants,
declaration of potential risk followed by lockdowns and
restrictions, followed by mass vaccinating populations
to "end" the 'pandemic' restrictions, followed by more
surveillance and so on. The funding for this scheme
comes primarily from taxpayers, while the profits go to
corporations and their investors
Takeover of Everything.
Bill Gates' Evil
Plan to End Democracy
He's the largest
funder of the WHO
seeking to cement their control
health through these amendments.
If we don't
soon they'll be
on the mere
suspicion a virus
In the March 22, 2023, video
far below, Dr.
David Bell, Ph.D., a PANDA
Science Sense Society 1 executive committee member,
2 reviews the new
international 'pandemic' treaty proposed by the World Health
Organization (WHO) - what it is and the impact it will have on democracy
and freedom across the world - and the proposed amendments to
international health regulations (IHR).
David Bell presents on the proposed new World Health
Organization emergency powers and looks at what they
mean and what they don't mean.
Dr Bell is a clinical and public health physician, with
a PhD in malaria epidemiology and modeling of
has held advisory and reviewer posts for the WHO, The
Global Fund, the Wellcome Trust, and the European
Commission, amongst others.
research and operational experience includes the Western
Pacific and Southeast Asia, and East and Southern
David has worked as Director of the Global Health
Technologies Portfolio at Intellectual Ventures Global
Good Fund; and as a Program Head for Malaria and Acute
Febrile Disease at the Foundation for Innovative New
Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva; and also as a coordinator
introducing malarial diagnostics and scale-up with the
David has over 90 peer-reviewed publications and is an
internationally requested reviewer and speaker.
is a Fellow of the Australasian Faculty of Public Health
Medicine and the Royal College of Physicians (UK) as
well as a member of PANDA's executive committee.
The Covid event has revealed that it was about more than
just public health and the political, economic and
societal aspects of the response are of far greater
significance than the virus itself.
There remains a continued drive toward the
transformation of our societies in ways that threaten
democracy and our existing ways of life.
Society Sessions aim to examine the political, societal
and economic dimensions of our recent experience and
analyze developments in the future.
As noted by PANDA: 4
"The COVID event has
revealed that it was about more than just public health and the
political, economic and societal aspects of the response are of
far greater significance than the virus itself.
There remains a
continued drive toward the transformation of our societies in
ways that threaten democracy and our existing ways of life."
The WHO's 'pandemic' treaty
and the IHR amendments are two of the strategies that are driving
transformation of society that threaten democracy and our
existing ways of life."
Both are aimed at
achieving the same thing, namely centralizing power over nations
with the WHO.
The WHO Is
As noted by Bell, the WHO is no longer what it used to be.
starters, private interests now wield immense power over the
Bill Gates is the largest
the WHO when you add together the donations from the Gates
Foundation and his other organizations, such as
GAVI the Vaccine
is very much
funders tell it to do.
Dr. David Bell
Another major change is that most of the funding is "specified,"
meaning it's earmarked for specific programs.
The WHO cannot allocate
those funds wherever they're needed most. This too massively
influences what the WHO does and how it does it.
As noted by Bell,
"The WHO is very much
an organization that does whatever its funders tell it to do"...
As just mentioned, Gates
wields the greatest financial influence, and he never seems to fund
anything that he can't profit from at the backend.
For example, he funds a
"green revolution" in Africa that promotes
(GE) crops because he's invested in the companies that supply GMO
The end result is greater
famine and poverty, but Gates laughs all the way to the bank...
He also funds vaccination campaigns for the very vaccines he's
It's not about charity or
doing good for the world.
simply creates markets for his investments.
Bell points out that the
COVID lockdown strategy clearly did not
come from the WHO itself, but rather from some outside source.
How do we know this?
guidelines up until the COVID outbreak called for isolating
infected patients only, for 7 to 10 days...
Then, when COVID came
about, that guidance was completely turned on its head, and the
entire world, sick and healthy alike, were told to self-isolate for
weeks and months at a time.
Someone made the WHO issue this
irrational and unscientific recommendation.
As a result of lockdowns, several of the WHO's supposed goals for
global health and well-being, especially for children, suffered
dramatic setbacks, yet they didn't seem to care.
On top of that, the WHO pushed for mass vaccination of populations
they clearly knew had extremely low risk for COVID:
young adults in terms of age groups, and Africa in terms of
Not surprisingly, Gates
vaccine-related organizations (GAVI and CEPI) led that charge.
Countermeasures Had Nothing to Do With Health Care
Bell also highlights how idiotic the vaccination narrative was.
"With a fast-moving
'pandemic', no one is safe unless everyone is safe."
That motto was reiterated
everywhere to promote
the COVID jab, yet it's completely irrational,
because people who recover from the infection have natural immunity.
They are extremely safe, regardless of others' vulnerability.
We don't need the
whole world to be immune.
We just need to meet
the threshold for
herd immunity and the vulnerable are
automatically protected by those with natural immunity.
"What this is
telling you is that the people running this are not
interested in evidence, in truth, or even in being logical,"
interested in sound bytes, and this has nothing to do with
health care. Nothing..."
If not about health, what
was the 'pandemic' response about?
In short, it was about
money, and more specifically, wealth transfer...
billionaires were created while some 200,000 small businesses were
destroyed in the U.S. in 2020 alone. 5
Vaccine makers also made
hundreds of billions of dollars on "vaccines" that provided
virtually no protection while killing an unprecedented number of
working age adults and decimating birth rates.
Show on Earth'
Bell goes on to review how the 'pandemic' industry is putting on "the
greatest show on earth."
According to the
'pandemic' industry, pandemics are becoming more frequent...
This is false, Bell says.
They also claim,
there's "increasing interaction between humans and
wildlife or livestock," the insinuation being that lethal viruses
regularly jump species...
This notion, Bell says,
is just "plain silly."
Still, these are the narratives they're going with to create a
feedback loop of,
surveillance for variants, declaration of potential
risk, followed by lockdowns and restrictions, followed by mass
vaccinating populations to "end" the 'pandemic' restrictions, followed
by more surveillance and so on...
The funding for this
scheme comes primarily from taxpayers, while the profits go to
corporations and their investors.
Instruments to Seize Control
As explained by Bell, the two primary instruments that will turn the
WHO into a central health police are the IHR amendments and the
WHO's 'pandemic' treaty. 6
The IHR amendments (which
have force under international law) will provide "teeth" to the
WHO's goal of increased control over health 'emergencies', while the
treaty will provide financing, governance and supply networks.
Destroy National and Individual Sovereignty
The IHR amendments, 7 as currently drafted:
definitions of 'pandemic's and health emergencies.
Specifically, it introduces "potential for harm" rather than
actual harm. So, the WHO can mandate lockdowns or medical
interventions based on the mere suspicion that a virus might
cause public harm.
recommendations of the IHR from nonbinding to mandatory, so
member states MUST follow and implement the WHO's
director-general's ability to independently and
single-handedly declare health emergencies.
Set up an
extensive surveillance apparatus in all member states.
Enable the WHO to
share country data without consent.
Give the WHO
control over certain resources within member countries,
including intellectual property rights.
support for censorship activities directed by the WHO.
IHR provisions that affect individuals from nonbinding to
binding, including provisions relating to,
Expand WHO's Power Beyond 'pandemics'
Meanwhile, the 'pandemic' treaty will:
Set up an
international supply network overseen by the WHO.
Fund the WHO's
health emergency structures and processes by requiring at
least 5% of national health budgets to be dedicated to
Set up a
governing body under the auspice of the WHO to oversee the
entire health emergency process.
Expand scope of
the WHO's power by emphasizing the "One Health"
which recognizes that a very broad range of aspects of life
and the environment can impact health and therefore fall
under the "potential" to cause harm.
This is how the WHO
will be able to declare
climate change as a 'health emergency'
and subsequently require climate lockdowns, for example...
The graphic 10 below
illustrates how the WHO's scope of control is expanded under the
Health agenda to cover vast aspects of everyday life.
Under the new treaty, the
WHO will have unilateral power to make decisions about any of these
areas, and its dictates will supersede and overrule any and all
local, state and federal laws.
Interestingly, the term "One Health," which was formally adopted by
the WHO and the G20 health ministers in 2017,
was first coined by
the executive vice president of the EcoHealth Alliance, the same
firm that appears to have had a hand in the creation of SARS-CoV-2,
William Karesh, DVM, in a 2003 article on Ebola. 11
Their Own Exploitation
As noted by Bell, it's not just the WHO that is pushing this agenda.
It's financed and promoted by a long list of organizations,
But while these entities
are officially funding the 'pandemic' industry, what's really
happening is they're,
"using taxes to fund
wealthy people to exploit poor populations elsewhere," Bell
We're also funding our
own exploitation and demise...!
It's not just the poor
that will suffer under a globalist totalitarian regime, but everyone
who is not part of the globalists' top echelon.
Taxpayers are providing the money while private profiteers are
deciding how that money is spent, and it's being spent in ways that
will benefit themselves.
So, it's a private-public
"partnership" where the public is being robbed and all the benefits
go to the private sector.
As it currently stands, the IHR amendments will be voted on in the
World Health Assembly (WHA) in May 2024, about a year from now.
They only need a majority
vote to pass.
If that vote happens
as planned, then the 10-month deadline for member states to
reject the amendments will expire in March 2025, and the
amendments will come into force in May 2025.
If a member state
opts out, then the current 2005 IHR version will apply to that
The WHO 'pandemic' treaty
will also be voted on by the WHA in May 2024.
It requires a
two-thirds majority vote to pass, and 30 member countries to ratify
Thirty days after
ratification, the treaty will take force for the countries that
The globalists don't want to wait three years, however, so in the
meantime, they're working on a third avenue, which involves the
creation of a,
"medical countermeasures platform for
And this platform will be
implemented by September 2023.
Many aspects of this
platform will then simply morph right into the IHR amendments and
"We need to
understand that this whole thing is based on complete nonsense,"
"But it's working."
and How to Stop It
In an April 16, 2023, Substack article, 12 Jessica Rose, a
postdoctoral researcher in biology, tries to make sense of the last
Starting at the end, she
believes the endgame is the,
"conversion of the
majority of human beings into workers... like ants..."
To get there, the
dehumanize us, systematically chip away at the human
spirit, render us infertile and destroy all notions of bodily
autonomy and national sovereignty...
And, like Bell says, the
plan has worked quite well so far.
But cracks are beginning to show.
More and more people are starting to put the puzzle pieces together,
as Rose attempts to do in her article...
COVID 'pandemic' was the set-up, Rose suggests.
It was geared to "test compliance levels" and set the scene for the next act, which
was to normalize all things abnormal.
The trans movement, which
completely overwhelmed the social consciousness in a single year, is
a continuation and expansion of that "normalization of the abnormal"
It's also a major component of the agenda to dehumanize and
sterilize the population.
After all, trans youth - which are also
among the most brainwashed individuals in society right now - are
the future of humanity...
A brand-new report by
legal experts backed by
the United Nations is also seeking to
normalize pedophilia, 13 which would further dehumanize and de-spirit
our youth for generations to come.
Adding insult to injury, the report was published March 8, 2023, "in
recognition" of International Women's Day.
Never mind the fact
that young girls and women are the primary victims of this sick
The "manmade climate
change" hysteria and subsequent
war on carbon is another fabricated
"emergency" that is unhinged from science and reality.
And, like the global
COVID response, the UN's Sustainable Development goals are perfectly
tailored to enable the endgame.
Under these goals, human freedom,
human health and quality of life are sacrificed to "protect the
environment and save the planet"...
As Rose notes, if the WHO
'pandemic' treaty goes through, we can
expect to be locked down indefinitely under the guise of,
catastrophe, likely linked to some 'deadly pathogen' passed to
humans via some insect vector like mosquitoes."
By then, central bank
digital currencies (CBDCs) will also be in place, which will enable,
totalitarian regime to enforce whatever restrictions the WHO and
its funders dream up, be it related to the food you're allowed
to eat based on your carbon footprint, the drugs you're forced
to take, what causes you're allowed to fund, what businesses
you're allowed to buy from, when and how far you're allowed to
travel or anything else...
"A practical way
I can think of to stop the endgame from being realized is to
stop the CBDC," Rose writes.
"Use cash. Insist upon it. Do not give
business to stores that only use cashless systems. Supply
equals demand, so demand the use of CASH.
Use bitcoin. It's the
antithesis of CBDCs."
Strategies to Reclaim Our Freedoms
At the end of his below video,
Bell also reviews some of the possible ways
in which we can respond to the threats to our national sovereignty
and personal freedom, and the challenges involved.
Reform the WHO
The question is how? Can it be reformed?
Exit and defund
Drawbacks of this strategy include the fact that
countries that exit the WHO lose direct influence over its
direction, and the 'pandemic' industry will still exist and
exert immense influence worldwide.
amendments and the treaty
Few countries will be able to
afford this, as non-cooperative member states will be
sanctioned by the rest. Malfeasant rulers will also still be
populace and politicians and "encourage noncompliance with
This is "a hard road," Bell says, "but [it]
gives the people a voice." Educating the populace,
politicians in particular, may ultimately be the best approach.
As noted by Bell in an
April 2, 2023, article in The Daily Sceptic: 14
community can benefit from coordination over public health. But
that is not what CA+ [the 'pandemic' treaty] proposes. This is a
draconian measure aimed at taking away national sovereignty.
It gives vast powers to a single organization with troubling
funding arrangements and a track record for causing terrible
reject these proposals, refuse to send taxpayer money to the WHO
and reject the notion of public health by dictate."
Science Sense Society
David Bell Bio
February 16, 2023
April 10, 2023
Street Journal April 16, 2021
6, 14 Daily
Sceptic April 2, 2023
Proposed IHR Amendments
One Health September 21, 2017
Shiraz Akram BDS April 15, 2023
Health Now September 28, 2017
Jessica Rose April 16, 2023
News April 17, 2023