|
|
|
|
Exopolitics Journal from ExopoliticsJournal Website
Abstract
This is exemplified by what we’ve termed “The Obama Conundrum” – i.e.: politicians and other members of the power strata are caught up in the classic, Cartesian dichotomy where terrestrial matters are seen in opposition to issues surrounding space migration.
After exploring some ideas as to why such a situation has come to exist we go on to examine post-Roswell extra-terrestrial influence on space philosophy and science, with a focus on a group of thinkers in the 1970s and 80s.
We look at the role advanced
intelligences are playing now to provoke the space issue and how
open contact could be a core component to succeeding in this shift.
The paper also provides evidence that space migration far from being
some abstract or wasteful enterprise, could in face be the economic
and political catalyst for the simultaneous process of helping
Earth’s current problems and providing a much needed bootstrapping
on collective consciousness as we make tentative steps to leave the
geostationary womb.
In this sense, the rocket, far from being one of the destroyers of civilization, may provide the safety valve that is needed to preserve it.
Indeed exopolitics has consciousness
elevation as its central tenet and as Clarke implies – by leaving
the gravity well of Earth we in fact stand a far greater chance of
terrestrial peace than it looks like we may achieve otherwise; let’s
face it, the signs aren’t all positive in this direction at present.
This notion that space colonization or interfacing and engaging with higher, off-planet intelligences has to exist in binary opposition to terrestrial progress is one all of us need to re-evaluate and soon if we’re to move along any useful evolutionary avenues.
In some ways the standard Obama response is a big ‘P’ Political tactic of course – how can senior politicians say otherwise when we have a culture based wholly around a financial scarcity and media friendly sound-bites?
A politician is far more likely to see his power maintained by building a hospital than building a space station; there’s little chance of him being heckled by demonstrators for the latter in contemporary society. The problem is also more than that - it’s far more fundamental to us as a species and how we’ve been conditioned to see ourselves.
This approach of terrestrial vs.
non-terrestrial is an ingrained, semantic trap which in fact mirrors
the classic Cartesian mind/body duality - but it’s one that will
become increasingly useless and cause an exponential degree of
confusion if we continue to cling to it.
If we look at just the financial element - we can see that this is no mean feat. In fact terrestrial economics is perhaps what gives us the greatest amount of inertia: global finance has become inseparable from other thought processes and thus futurist planning. Global economic flows may be virtually virtual in the 21st Century but their relative position as zeros and ones makes finance a part of everything we see and do.
When we combine this supply and demand,
scarcity based [let’s call it ‘old world’] economics with the
predominant political attitude towards those intelligences
monitoring our planet we can see the scale of the education issue at
hand.
It is only by this tactic of
infiltration that it will achieve the core aims many of us have for
it; this must ultimately be the healing of the divide between
terrestrial and extra-terrestrial - on all levels we process that
concept.
From this point many previously intransigent situations are able to be re-evaluated from a new perspective.
For example - much of the deeper political aspects as discussed by Berkley professor Peter Dale Scott become easier to process including conspiracy based views, links to state backed crime, black projects, the intelligence matrix and of course the issue of extra-terrestrial contact.
So given we now have an increasing
number of people using this approach – what can we contribute to
mapping our species path out of a constricted planetary
consciousness and into a galactic one – bringing with it the
benefits we’ve mentioned and breaking free from the Obama Conundrum?
Instrumental to this tension and in addition to terrestrial hegemonic battles are the various ET groups that accelerated their observation and intervention with the exploitation of atomic weaponry at Trinity and Hiroshima. Since this era some blatant displays by UFOs above power stations and nuclear missile launch facilities have made their intentions clear [1].
The response to the immediate post-war UFO increase and incidents such as Roswell was the 1947 National Security Act and establishment of what we now know in the wider Western world as the ‘Security State’.
Focused initially on
Communism, a more modern [and realistic] reading would put the UFO
issue on par with this, at least in the view of the upper echelons
of military and intelligence circles.
In turn this generation rejected much of the formal and
paranoiac tendencies of the 1950s and instead looked for new ways of
seeing the world. It’s possible this resulted in the amplification
of space-oriented ideas and consciousness in the mid-late 1970s.
Leary lists Barbara Marx Hubbard, Barry Goldwater, NASA astronaut Brian O’Leary amongst a series of contributors to this area [2]. These people were taking the fiction out of science fiction and offering space as a viable place to inhabit.
Indeed one of Leary’s associates was Princeton Professor of Engineering Gerry O’Neil who in a 1974 paper suggested the following [3]:
These points demonstrate that the
practical considerations of space migration had, by the 1970s, moved
out of Clarke’s Sci-Fi realm and into the mainstream
O’Neil was a formal academic scientist yet we could consider him and the group Leary wrote about as the first true ‘Exopoliticians’ given their understanding of space migration on more integrated level.
Another product of the consciousness paradigm of the late 1960s to bloom in the 70s was the Deep Ecology movements.
Organization such as Earth First made also viewed the environmental challenges through a ‘deep’ or parallel processing framework. We can see the influence of the Ecology card in O’Neil’s points above and this is a theme that remains strong, if not stronger, today.
A move off-planet in some form can offer
vast ecological solutions for a civilization that is struggling to
allocate resources in an equitable manner and release or invest in
advanced free-energy systems currently closeted by above-government
cabals as part of the wider umbrella term that Steve Bassett calls
the UFO/ET Truth Embargo [4].
This
culminated into the L-5 Group [5] (click above image) which examined the wider
issues from scientific, psychological, political and cultural
perspectives.
These Sirius or Starseed transmissions
have been well documented in the writings of some of these people
including Phillip K Dick. Does the fact some form of advanced
intelligence was focusing on this group of futurists mean they were
on
I suggest this tentatively as there does seem to be some ‘meta’ structure or process to contact if we look at the data for the era. This mirrors what long term contactee Jim Sparks suggested with regard to a set protocol for ET intervention on developing planets where the formal power structures are interfaced with initially and then, depending on the outcome, the ET groups will then move on to a large-scale process of contacting individuals [6].
It seems certain that several attempts
at official first contact were made in the 1940s and 50s starting
with the US military and President Eisenhower.[7] We also
saw a kind of mass civilian attempt at contact in the California
desert in the late 50s ‘Space Brother’ era and a stream of high
profile individual communications in the last few decades starting
with Whitley Strieber’s much popularized encounters.
Advanced scientist Tesla also had ideas ‘beamed’ into his mind during dreams and waking states of consciousness.
An interesting case in 2009 demonstrated that this tactic is continuing. Dr Roger Leir and author Whitley Strieber provided us with the account of a high level, advanced tech scientist who first hand admitted he had been involved in very real contact with an advanced group of ETs.[9]
‘John Smith’ provides a perfect example of this technology seeding by his agreement to the removal of an implant by Dr Leir. When tested - this implant contained non-terrestrial isotopes yet it was formed using a specific production method which aligned perfectly to the very area the scientist was involved in working on.
That is, the ETs once more demonstrated
a side we see in some of them frequently - that of the ‘pragmatic
prankster’ insofar as they are catalyzing our knowledge “just
enough” to be useful without going too far and risking some sort of
space-time glitch.
Given that we’re in the middle of a global recession you’d think that radical options would now be offered as viable solutions. When you strip away the media misinformation the more aware economists and trends forecasters point to 2008/9 as the era when the free-market system we’ve used and abused for centuries actually implodes.
Free markets have become just the reverse with fraudulent associations manifesting between state and corporation not to mention the research of Peter Dale Scott who demonstrates that the ties between ‘civilian’ sectors and crime syndicates are now such that they are accepted and invisible to most.[10]
Thus we
The move to a space-oriented economy could however help in forming an alternative and successful avenue to future prosperity.
The Obama Conundrum would resolve itself
by creating a 21st century New Deal focused on expanding new
technology, employing people in new, associated disciplines and
encouraging all other public and private sectors to have the New
‘Space’ Deal at the leading edge of their Research and Development
strategy.
It’s interesting to note that even the researchers and academics who have previously been hesitant to approach issues related to expansion into space are now including this in their current discussions due to the economic considerations.
Popular author Webster Griffin Tarpley now says that mass funding of both modern terrestrial technology such as mag-lev trains and off-planet systems are the solution to both the new presidents economic woes and the global uncertainty we’re all witnessing [11].
Ex-Forbes Asian Bureau journalist
Benjamin Fulford similarly points to “terra-forming Mars” as a
constructive option for regeneration and a useful diversion from the
negative terrestrial monkey business!
He pointed to the possibility that non-terrestrial resources,
Again we see here an alternative
approach to the usual barriers that those opposed to off-planet
expansion would undoubtedly mention once the topic became a serious
consideration.
Along with the political drive and vision to push space migration onto the agenda and benefit from the points we’ve raised above, governing institutions will need to consider scarcity and funding in a different way than the past. The standard terrestrial approach to the economic process is flawed on many levels although the general idea of supply and demand free markets does produce efficiency and maximizes choice and cost.
Systemic problems of contemporary high finance include:
A space-oriented economy would do best
to reduce the impact of many of these elements and shift the focus
to a research and development based system. A useful and fundamental
perspective change along the lines of that posited by the Venus
Project would help map such a transition:
Fresco claims the revolution in this is that the questions then stop being,
The latter context seems a simple shift
yet it provides the ‘yes’ answer far more frequently than the
monetary oriented system does.
Although big ‘D’ Disclosure is a simple admission or policy change on one level - it has associated threads which would also be introduced into consensus reality once the basic process was initiated. A major part of this is the creation of some sort of truth and reconciliation system for those covert project workers who are currently or have previously been engaged in processes that keep advanced technology and information from the public and even governments of the day.
The acknowledgement of ETs and black project amnesty, if achieved, would vastly increase the speed at which novel ideas such as space migration could be considered.
click above image for video
We’re already aware of not only technology that has been back-engineered from extra-terrestrial hardware but there is some evidence of direct and indirect exchanges with ETs too. Should this be released as part of ongoing integration of the ‘alien’ paradigm we could be decades ahead of where we are now in a short time period.
Given that technology, science and
cultural outlook are all to an extent interwoven, it’s likely that
an exponential feedback loop would build with the collective
consciousness of the species; i.e.: so long as we ensured the
emphasis was placed on the freedom possibilities as opposed to the
‘Borgian’ or Orwellian aspects it’s feasible that what seem like
dreams today may be easily attainable.
JJ Hurtak describes it thus:
He adds:
The UFO accounts are already littered with hints at technology exchanges [16] – so imagine this situation but carried out in an open, transparent manner for the benefit of all. Secondly it’s likely that a tipping point would occur with regards public acceptance of the ET issue and thus by default agreement for the space migration vision itself.
Previous historical experience dictates
that it doesn’t require anywhere near a ‘democratic’ 100% to create
a suitable wave of change. Once key members of each cultural group
[politicians, scientists, engineers, artists etc.] were on board, a
mini ‘omega point’ of transcendence would take place hopefully
continuing the cycle of change for the better.
Apart from global war or the threat of a
meteor strike there seem little to compare to ET disclosure for
catalyzing all aspects of society into embracing novel ideas and
working through difficult times.
In a mid 70s article he stated:
Although it seems doubtful that such a process will be taking place by 2025, it does show how strong the issue was becoming in recent decades.
Indeed – tangible signs do exist of trips to space becoming regular events if we see space tourism as a prelude to space migration an colonization. In the last couple of years British business guru Richard Branson joined with advanced aviator Burt Rutan and others to start Virgin Galactic.
They have private technology capable of taking paying passengers into low earth orbit right at this moment.
Also in the planning are projects such as The Ranch (below video) which allows new energy researchers to work in an advanced environment with the ultimate aim of citizen anti-gravity and space travel [18].
The Ranch Project
In many areas we can now see examples of habitats on earth that contain many of the elements required for off-planet living.
Recently Britain’s Eden Project [19]
announced a ground-breaking new energy system which utilizes
geothermal power and could run up to 5000 British homes (click below
image).
In the article it was found that a repeating concern of many visiting Et groups was the fact that for the Earth to remain a healthy, supporting entity – we needed to rapidly re-think how to deal with exponentially increasing terrestrial numbers.
Whilst we agreed that this area is somewhat contentious, a little research shows this issue to be at the top of UN and other geopolitical agendas.
Linked into this terrestrial drive to confront the issue was the fact there were few contact cases where care for Earths ecology and thus population considerations wasn’t prioritized.
Recently the exopolitical community encountered the case of a Navy officer, who could perhaps be termed a whistleblower, who discussed the fact that secret UN meetings had taken place on a variety of areas directly related to the imminent arrival of a large ET federation [21].
Whilst there are a lot of angles to this case – relevant to our topic was the fact that the Pickering brothers were told about plans to one day take a proportion of the human race off-planet due to an impending E.L.E. or extinction level event.
The ET group in charge of the contact
and who allegedly were represented directly at some UN meetings have
stated that they were in the process of creating a suitable, highly
complex biosphere for those they would take. It was however pointed
out that they could only take a representative ‘genetic’ sample or
proportion of the current global population and that it was up to us
to find methods of reducing our numbers prior to this actually
occurring.
Perhaps an argument for inviting non-terrestrial groups into open communication with us is for just this reason i.e.: space faring ETs may well have experienced the exact process of a civilization moving from the planetary gravity well in their own or other cultures and can thus offer unique help and perspectives. We know from contactee testimony that some of the ships that arrive in our region of space are breathtakingly vast in size and function and therefore possess life-support systems to some extent.
Swiss contactee Billy Meier reported on his first visit to the Plejaren mothership The Great Spacer:
Whilst this sort of account is easy for skeptics to dismiss we can point to cases such as the 1990s Phoenix Lights and the sighting by Ray Bowyer in Southern England of a craft “at least a mile wide”.[23]
Thus we have more evidence than just Star Trek to know that fully functioning, mobile habitats are a reality and indeed a possibility if we decided to request some degree of ET assistance in this area. Having this ability to leave the mother planet for long periods may be useful one day if not vital and a genetic imperative. This may sound dramatic but just one issue directly impacting on terrestrial DNA is the amount of depleted uranium poisoning all areas of the globe.
This is the tip of the iceberg when it
come to many of the modern technologies we are still unsure of the
long term effects of.
In books such as Exo-Psychology
(click image right) and Neuropolitique he
used his background as a Harvard psychologist and
Few people were looking at the impact of
such a transition so deeply on a personal and collective
psychological level.
This is a similar situation to the groups that left England for the New World and the Pioneers who headed to those new territories knowing that the further they went - the less the impact of any governing body would be.
William S. Burroughs once made the point that a peaceful and productive future would best be served by allowing groups with shared interests and philosophies to create their own zones of living.
Space migration offers the best chance of this given the current pressure on terrestrial land resources from both the ecological groups and private conglomerates.
It’s strange to look back at the 19th Century and realize that in a sense it provided more room for exploring real situations of Utopia [see Thomas Moore et al] that we maybe have today. Looking back at the frontier movement in America at that time there were over 1000 novel, community experiments. Many of these failed or were adopted by future government structures but some still remain today such as the Amish.
Thus on the basic level of a ‘good’
society, space offers the chance of new energy forms and the
possibility of societal experiments’ - two core problems of
contemporary terrestrial living.
In fact in some areas we could see these
territorial battles amplifying – we already have the military aiming
to ‘Own Space’ [26] in coming decades and civilian
activists attempting to prevent space weaponisation.[27]
Both civilian and government institutions need to guard against the dominance of space or advanced, space-oriented technologies, by unrepresented groups and cabals. Terrestrial experience has surely been sufficient by now to have learned which games are worth playing and which projects worth supporting.
A recent report by Alfred Webre of Exopolitics.com highlights how careful we should be when trying to use space as a scientific testing ground.
We’ve already had testimony from government employees like Karl Wolf (below video) that the moon has bases built upon it and thus may be inhabited to some degree. [28]
Searl located a unique method for powering his devices and after successfully flying the machines over the UK and allegedly to Australia using amateur radio sets as navigation control he moved on to citizen transport designs. Searl wanted to introduce space travel to the world by initially offering trips out of the atmosphere and eventually to the moon and back.
He knew this was possible and it seemed
so did NASA and the British military as just at this point he was
accused of creating a “Cold War” alert [30] with his
Searl
refused and was soon forced to stop his efforts when he was arrested
on a series of bogus charges related to fraudulent electricity
theft.
Wikipedia claims that,
…but they do have some amateur scientists and technicians linked to their groups around the world. Their approach is important memetically if it lacks the resources and abilities to currently challenge formal space access on a practical level.
Their mission statement includes:
Wilson when asked about the hesitancy of public funding for this area being slow stated that he’d prefer to see private business engaging this area:
There is significant evidence that global military structures have a presence at various planetary orbital levels already - all of this is undeclared. Currently we are told that apart from the International Space Station and the odd Shuttle flight the only terrestrial tech in space are the numerous forms of satellites.
In the last couple of years the Exopolitics community considered two significant items of evidence that demonstrates this to be untrue. The first was the claim of Gary McKinnon who, after watching the Disclosure Project in 2001, penetrated NASA and military networks and claims to have found data related to a “Non-terrestrial officer” fleet and “fleet-to-fleet transfers” – the latter ‘ship’ names matched no Naval sea-going fleet Gary could find.
Linked to this are the stunning, high-resolution images of John Leonard Walson [a pseudonym] who’s astro-videography has received acclaim from academics and even NASA employees. JLW’s images show vast space ‘machines’ and platforms that are to date undisclosed.
Whether these are terrestrial ‘black’
technology, ET based tech or some sort of shared system is currently
unclear but the first option seems the most likely.[33]
These may appear minor compared to the
majority of everyday terrestrial ‘business as normal’ but we should
not underestimate the tendency of situations to flip when the
environmental factors are suitable. Space migration and the
associated changes and benefits it brings us is not some abstract
idea that may or may not one day be pursued by a few elite – it’s
far more.
If you look at the work of the 1970s
futurists and the L-5 group it’s part of the longer term genetic
plan for the species, i.e., it’s not optional. The only time it may
become just an option is if we achieve the evolutionary F-Grade and
blow ourselves out of orbit or so badly destroy our biosphere that
we can’t leave a dying planet in time anyway.
If these genetic masters came to Earth, seeded us and left, this seems to be a hint that we’re destined to do the same - or at least continue exploring the boundaries we perceive around us.
By embracing the ‘alien’ aspect of ourselves we also begin to liberate ourselves towards more infinite beings and the ability to collapse separateness is key to that process.
We can employ help with this transition because whether most of us are aware or not, this help is already taking place.
By working on shifting the Obama
Conundrum from a problematic discourse to one of vision and
pragmatism by including the space issue, we stand to claim our
evolutionary birth-right and start our journey to the stars - as
appears to have been done by the civilizations that watch over us.
|
