by Dr. Joseph Mercola
July 10, 2022
from
Mercola Website
Spanish
version
Source
Story at-a-glance
-
"Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda," produced by Dr.
Andrew Wakefield and Children's Health Defense, details
the World Health Organization's intentions to produce an
anti-fertility vaccine in response to perceived
overpopulation, and how such vaccines have been used -
without people's knowledge or consent - since the
mid-'90s
-
The
WHO has been caught more than once deliberately
deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated
against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized
-
The
film clearly illustrates the depopulation agenda is not
a conspiracy theory. It's reality, and it's happening
worldwide. The HPV vaccine and the COVID shots also have
adverse impacts on fertility that are being ignored
-
In
the decade after the rollout of the HPV vaccine, the
teen pregnancy rate dropped by 50%
-
While VAERS is the only publicly available system to
assess COVID jab injuries, the U.S. government has at
least 10 other reporting systems they're not sharing
data from. Children's Health Defense is filing Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the other systems
to get a better idea of the scale of harms, but VAERS
and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of
injuries and deaths is enormous. Data from insurance
companies around the world also confirm this
In the interview at bottom page, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Mary Holland,
president and chief legal counsel for Children's Health Defense,
discuss their new documentary film, "Infertility - A Diabolical
Agenda," which we published yesterday.
If you missed it, you can
watch it
here and
here.
"Infertility - A Diabolical Agenda" is Wakefield's fourth film.
The
first was "Who Killed Alex Spourdalakis?" followed by "Vaxxed" and
"1986 - The Act."
This latest film details the World Health
Organization's (WHO) intentions to produce an anti-fertility vaccine in
response to perceived overpopulation, and how such vaccines have
been used without people's knowledge or consent since the mid-'90s.
"It's a very important story, and it's a story that I'd been aware
of for some years," Wakefield says.
"I think a lot of people heard
about this intentional infertility vaccine program being conducted,
primarily in women in developing countries such as Africa. But it
had gone into abeyance so I hadn't paid due attention.
I should have paid more attention to it, because people had asked me
over the years,
'Do you think there is a population control agenda?'...
The allegation had been that the World Health Organization, under
the guise of a neonatal tetanus prevention program, had been
deliberately sterilizing women [in Kenya] - either using a vaccine
to abort existing pregnancies or to prevent future pregnancies.
They
had done this under the guise of protecting children rather than
actually reducing the population."
As explained by Wakefield, it was no secret that the WHO had been
working on an anti-fertility vaccine since the 1970s. 1
Papers were
published, and the WHO itself even admitted it. The real issue here
is that of informed consent. The WHO has been caught more than once
deliberately deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated
against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized.
This is an
ethical and moral low that is hard to beat.
Covert
Sterilization Campaign in the Philippines Revealed
The story detailed in this film begins in 1995, when the Kenyan
government launched a WHO vaccination campaign against tetanus among
women of childbearing age.
Dr. Stephen K. Karanja, former chairman
of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, became suspicious of the
program when he learned that involuntary sterilization programs
posing as tetanus programs had occurred.
That same year, 1995, the Catholic Women's League of the Philippines
actually won a court order halting a UNICEF tetanus program that was
using tetanus vaccine laced with hCG.
Anti-hCG-laced vaccines had
also been found in at least four other countries.
This anti-hCG-laced tetanus vaccine perfectly matched the
anti-fertility vaccine the WHO had announced in 1993.
The paper
trail reveals that by 1976, WHO researchers had successfully
conjugated, meaning combined or attached, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) onto tetanus toxoid, used in the tetanus vaccine.
As a result, when given to a woman, she develops antibodies against
both tetanus and hCG.
HCG is a hormone that is produced as soon as the sperm enters the
egg and the embryo begins to form. In response to this signal, the
woman's ovaries then produce progesterone, which maintains the
pregnancy to term.
The conjugated vaccine effectively ends and
prevents pregnancy as her own immune system will immediately attack
and destroy the hCG as soon as it forms.
At the time, Karanja, who passed away in 2021, convinced leaders of
the Catholic Church - one of the largest health care providers in
Kenya - to test the tetanus vaccine being given, to make sure there
was no foul play.
Without explanation, the WHO abandoned the 1995
campaign, but in 2014, they were back with a neonatal tetanus
program.
A Diabolical
Agenda
Girls and women, 15 to 49 years of age, were instructed to get
vaccinated with a series of five injections, six months apart.
Suspiciously, this is the exact schedule required for the
anti-fertility vaccine to produce sterility. Regular tetanus
prevention requires only one injection every five to 10 years, and
under no circumstance would you need five of them.
The Catholic Church decided to test the vaccines and collected three
sample vials directly from clinics during the 2014 campaign. The
samples were tested by three independent laboratories and, as
feared, they contained hCG.
Another six vials were then collected
and tested.
This time, half were found to contain hCG...
When the Catholic Church went public with the findings, urging girls
and women to not comply with the vaccination campaign, the Kenyan
government went on the defensive, insisting there was nothing wrong
with the vaccine.
Wakefield says:
"They used the media to demonize the Catholic Church and insinuate
there had been deliberate contamination of these samples with hCG to
produce the result they wanted.
That's where it remained until - and this is where it gets really
interesting and where the film really comes into its own - our
cameras were invited back into the laboratory where these tests were
done... [and] the truth was revealed.
It came down to a resolution of this key question of,
Who was lying
and who was being honest?
Who was cheating, who was not?
It's really
an extraordinary story that woke me up to the importance of this
issue.
There is an extraordinary prophetic statement at the end from
the late Dr. Karanja, OBGYN from Africa. who was at the heart of all
of this.
He said,
'When they are
finished with Africa they're coming for you'...
That's probably a pertinent place to hand over to Mary, because
never could a prophecy have been more apt, more true."
Depopulation
Agenda Is Now a Conspiracy Fact
Holland continues:
"It's been very hard to answer... when people would ask us, 'Is
there a depopulation agenda?'
People would point to things Bill
Gates said, like how vaccines would reduce the population. There was
an interpretation that it was going to make people healthier, and
therefore they would choose not to have more children.
It was murky. I think this film really helps us understand that this
is not a conspiracy theory. It's an absolute reality... The film
makes that 100% clear. There's just no question about it.
And you
see the deceit and deception.
Just to point out, the Rome statute
for the International Criminal Court that most countries of the
world have signed onto... makes forced sterilization a war crime.
This is not a trivial thing, to deprive people of informed consent
and to sterilize them. That's exactly what happened. One of the
interviews in the film that is so poignant is of a woman who cannot
carry a pregnancy to term.
She comes to realize that she has
antibodies to hCG, and she realizes that somebody, somewhere, made
her infertile. It is, as she calls it, a diabolical agenda...
We can now look back at what happened with the human papillomavirus
(HPV) vaccine, which I co-wrote a book about in 2018. One of the
things we saw was that... the teen pregnancy rate dropped 50% from
2007 to 2018 - 50%!
Now, whatever one wants to think about unplanned
pregnancies, that is a staggering drop over 10 years.
People were reporting extreme reproductive effects from the HPV
vaccine. Now we're hearing the same thing, only much more so, with
respect to COVID shots.
We're hearing that women are having
miscarriages, babies are literally dying from breastfeeding mothers
who have been recently vaccinated.
Congenital deformities are being reported to the vaccine adverse
event reporting system (VAERS).
It's now, I think, beyond the realm
of conspiracy theory to say it is very plausible that these vaccines
that are being pushed on the world - particularly the COVID shots -
have strong anti-fertility effects."
Is There Such
a Thing as Vaccine Safety?
It's important to realize that no study has ever proven that any of
the vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule are safe,
especially when given in various combinations.
As noted by
Wakefield, vaccine manufacturers and people like Dr.
Anthony Fauci
present "an almost kindergarten-like approach" to safety.
The blanket statement given is that vaccines in general, and
the COVID shots in particular, are "safe and effective," and that they
have no adverse effects on reproduction and fertility.
This, despite
the fact they've done no reproductive studies at all.
Women who hear such assurances will assume the necessary studies
HAVE been done when, in fact, that's a complete lie. The reality is,
you cannot find evidence of harm if you're not looking for it.
Another reality is that assumptions and guesses about science are
not the same as scientific evidence.
One major assumption that has
now turned out to be completely wrong is that the mRNA injection
stays in the deltoid muscle, the site of injection.
"No one has ever sought to determine whether they remain at the site
of injection or not, or whether they disseminate throughout the
body, which of course they do," Wakefield says.
"So, it's a naive
and completely inappropriate assumption.
The other assumption that was completely inappropriate was making
any assumption at all. You're going to give this [shot] to seven
billion people... and you're going to assume something about its
safety?
Then you discover, after giving it to the majority of that
seven billion population, that you were completely wrong.
In fact, it goes throughout the body. The spike protein can be found
in tissues throughout the body, including and in particular in the
ovaries. There it can set up an inflammatory reaction, autoimmunity,
damage and infertility. There is no question that is biologically
plausible.
So here you have the mentality of these people, that after the horse
has bolted, they are trying to shut the gate. If there is going to
be damage, then the damage is done and it is too late.
That is
totally irresponsible and people need to know that."
Wakefield further points out that no clinical trial for any of the
vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule has ever been tested
against a true placebo.
All have used active placebos, such as an
aluminum injection or another vaccine, which effectively hides most
of the adverse effects.
Interestingly, in some of the COVID jab trials, they actually used a
completely inert placebo (although some vaccine makers used another
vaccine).
But then note what happened.
Before the trial was over,
they unblinded everyone and offered the jab to everyone in the
placebo group, effectively eradicating the control group altogether!
Then, they tried to bury the data under red tape for 75 years.
Thankfully, a sensible judge didn't let them get away with it.
Wakefield says:
"They [Pfizer] knew there were problems.
They had identified the
problems doing the appropriate study, at least to start with, until
they gave the crossover group the vaccine.
Then they tried to hide
the data because they knew it revealed the seriousness of the
adverse reactions to their vaccine.
The court overruled them and now
those data are being analyzed, and they are terrifying."
Stunning
Abdication of Science
What's worse, government has incentivized ignorance under the law.
They have incentivized not knowing what the long-term effects are.
Holland adds:
"What's particularly stunning, in terms of the absolute abdication
from science, is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
has said it's perfectly fine to co-administer the COVID shots with
everything else on the childhood schedule.
That is going to have
untold horrific likely effects ...
Most pediatricians will say 'Hey,
the CDC says it's fine'... They
are going to be co-administering these shots with other things, and
there is no science to back that up.
None..."
Unfortunately, the future looks grim in this regard, as the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is now considering a "Future Framework"
in which vaccine makers will be allowed to reformulate and release
future COVID shots without any additional testing.
Clinical trials
are easy to rig to begin with, but now they won't even have to go
through the trouble of fabricating desired results.
"And, of course there will be harmful effects on fertility," Holland
says.
"I think it's becoming very clear that we just have to reject
all of this. It is corrupted to its core. It's anti-human, I mean
it's truly anti-human.
I think the reality that we're in is becoming
clearer."
A Hopeful Note
Wakefield adds:
"To follow-up on that, a note of hope...
People coming to this anew
may think that we're in a terribly dark time. I see it differently,
having been in this now for 30 years. When I started out, a handful
of people around the world were prepared to debate the thorny issue
of vaccine safety.
Now I read the other day that 70% of American adults have rejected
the CDC's recommended protocol for the COVID vaccine.
They either
didn't get the first dose, they didn't get the second dose, or they
have refused to get the boosters, saying this is neither necessary
nor is it safe.
Those people - 70% of American adults - according to mainstream
media are anti-vaxxers. So, whether they know it or not, they've
joined our team and the other side has lost.
This is a desperate, desperate measure; one hail Mary pass after
another, and it's failing very, very badly.
For those of you who
have not seen it from an historical perspective, take heart, because
the world really is waking up in an extraordinary way...
The silver lining of the dark cloud of COVID is that it has woken so
many people...
There is an inevitability to what is happening here,
and they will not get away with it for very much longer."
We've Allowed
the Creation of an Anti-Human World
As for those who insist they have no objections to childhood
vaccines, only the COVID jab, Wakefield warns just about every
vaccine safety advocate began by objecting to a single vaccine or
single ingredient before realizing it isn't that simple:
"We all came to the
collective realization that this was far more complex than we
had previously imagined.
They were making it
more and more complex by the year, adding more vaccines into the
schedule, lumping them all together. As Mary said, the idea of
these vaccines being safe in combination was one they'd never
tested but merely assumed to be safe...
We came to the realization that it is some cumulative toxicity, some
interactive effect, some potentiation that is leading to this
massive increase in, for example, neurodevelopmental or
immunological disorders.
Had we been allowed to continue the research, any of us, all of us,
we would have answers now. But we don't have answers because the
work was sabotaged at every turn, and now we are living in a state
of greater ignorance than we were before.
We're now living in
a world of man-made diseases. It's absolutely
staggering.
None of this need ever have happened, and yet here we
are with all of these new conditions or new variants on an old
theme, like regressive autism, that we did not see before. That is
something that man has created.
Just as easily man could get rid of it if we took the initiative.
That's what, collectively, we have to do, and that's what Children's
Health Defense is doing.
They're alerting people to this, waking
them up, and it's working."
In addition to learning about the dangers of vaccines, people are
also starting to learn more about other environmental toxins -
pesticides, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), air pollution,
water pollution, artificial foods, hormone-mimicking plastic
chemicals and more, all of which have adverse effects on health and
reproductive capacity.
"I think most humans want to live in a pro-human environment,"
Holland says.
"And I think the corporate government world we're in
right now is genuinely anti-human."
The Scale of
Harm Is Staggering
While VAERS is the only publicly available database collecting
adverse vaccine reactions, the U.S. government has at least 10 other
adverse event reporting systems that they're not sharing data from.
Children's Health Defense is filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
requests for the other systems to get a better idea of the scale of
harms, but VAERS and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of
injuries and deaths is enormous...
Data from insurance companies
around the world also confirm this.
Holland notes:
"In 2021, from one life insurance company in the United States, an
Indiana company, we know that 18 to 64 year olds suffer a 40% excess
death rate.
They said a 10% shift would be a 1 in 200-year
occurrence. A 40% shift is beyond catastrophic, and that's what
we're looking at.
These are secrets that can't be hidden."
Panafrican
Congress Is Pushing Back
Another piece of positive news is that a Panafrican Congress that
was recently convened is starting to push back against the
WHO.
And,
if the WHO were to be banned from a continent like Africa, it would
be game over for them.
Holland explains:
"The WHO is following a two-track course to get to what they say, in
2024, will be a new international treaty, which basically will put
the WHO at the center of global health and governance de facto.
One
track was through U.S.-proposed international health regulations.
The U.S. proposed 12 regulations in December 2021 that would put the
WHO at the center of these things and put in place very draconian
regulations that would allow the WHO to supersede any decisions at
the national government level.
In a vote on those new international
health regulation amendments, 47 African countries rejected all of
them.
Africa really led the way in saying,
'No, we don't trust the WHO, we
don't want the WHO in this role.'
That's very exciting because
Africa absolutely has been exploited in every which way by the WHO
and their pharmaceutical industry partners. I don't think the WHO
agenda is dead.
We still have a lot of work to do.
But clearly, we did have on Saturday an African sovereignty
coalition launch, which you can see on the Children's Health Defense
TV website. There were activists, advocates, physicians, scientists
from all over Africa, and then supporters from around the world.
It's very exciting.
I think Africa is sending a message loud and
clear we will not put up with this ...
We'll take it one day at a time, but I believe the WHO and its
backers will fail, and certainly many people around the world,
Children's Health Defense included, are working on lawsuits to prove
there's fraud going on here, this is criminal activity.
Certainly,
the authorization for [young] children [is a criminal act].
We're going to amend the lawsuit we have, which is to contest the
jabs for 5 to 11-year-olds that the FDA authorized. We'll just amend
that for these younger children.
This is devastating, this is a
crime against humanity. There is no justification for young children
getting these shots.
They are not at risk of serious injury or death
from COVID, but they certainly are at risk from these shots."
Can the
Judicial System Be Trusted?
Speaking of lawsuits, many legal actions over the past two years
have failed, but Holland, who is the chief legal counsel for
Children's Health Defense, is optimistic, because courts tend to
shift with public opinion.
She's noticed courts are becoming
increasingly receptive to the notion that there may be fraud going
on with the COVID jabs, and that conflicts of interest play a role.
For example, two judges in New York who were assigned to cases she
was representing were recently forced to recuse themselves, after it
became known they owned between $50,000 and $500,000 in Pfizer
stock.
"I think we're likely to see many more successful lawsuits going
forward in the next two years than in the last two years," she says.
"I think the population is coming to understand that there are
conflicts of interest that prevent these people from being unbiased.
I think it's a question of time, and I think we're in a
race against
time, but I do believe that lawsuits are likely to be more
successful as time goes on and I think we're already seeing that.
We
struck down the OSHA mandate, we struck down the mask mandates in
airline transportation, we got access to the Pfizer documents.
I
think there's more good news coming from the courts, I really do."
The home run, judicially speaking, would be if we could prove
vaccine makers committed fraud or "willful misconduct," as that
would eliminate all of their protections against prosecution and
liability.
The
COVID jabs are authorized for emergency use under the
2005 PREP Act - which Holland believes is unconstitutional - and
under that law, willful misconduct must be proven by "clear and
convincing evidence."
"I believe that at this point we're getting very, very close to that
threshold where we can prove willful misconduct by clear and
convincing evidence," she says.
"At that point, I think it will be clear to the whole population
that it's the liability protection on the back end and the mandates
at the front end that makes this whole enterprise possible.
I think
there are serious attacks on both of those, and by the time the
whole truth comes out, the whole vaccine paradigm disappears.
I think it's in our sights, I really do. I think the health of the
unvaccinated is overwhelmingly superior to the health of the
vaccinated, and that story's coming out.
Children's Health Defense
is coming out with a book this fall by Dr. Brian Hooker and
Robert
F. Kennedy Jr., about the science showing how much healthier
unvaccinated people are.
I think the truth is coming out, and I think the stakes are very
high for the next couple years. But I really do believe that at the
end of these couple years we will be in a whole new paradigm of
vaccines and health.
People have seen enough about the bad side of COVID shots that they are now open to this.
I think we're likely to
see a sea change."
In closing, if you didn't watch the film yesterday, set aside 30
minutes to do it now.
And, be sure to watch it all the way to the
end. The final 10 minutes include an update on the Kenya story, a
review of what happened with the HPV vaccine, and an overview of
what we know about the COVID shots' potential impacts on fertility.
It's important to realize that this depopulation agenda didn't begin
and end in Kenya.
It's happening worldwide...!
More Movies
Are Coming
Wakefield's fifth film is already in preproduction and should be
ready for release next year.
This one will be a full-length
narrative feature about the childhood vaccination schedule. It was
co-written by Terry Rossio, who also wrote "Shrek," "Pirates of the
Caribbean," "Aladdin" and other well-known movie productions.
"It's a very powerful film, it will really move the mindset,"
Wakefield says.
"It will take those who have been awoken by the
issue of COVID vaccines across the bridge from the adult vaccine
schedule to the realization that this has been happening in the
childhood vaccine schedule since the very beginning.
It's a very,
very important film."
Children's Health Defense will also be coming out with a film
version of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s book, "The Real Anthony Fauci."
That will be coming out later this year for which I was interviewed.
Video
Sources and
References
1
Scientific Research October 2017; 4(10)
|