|
by Derrick Broze
May 2020
from
TheLastAmericanVagabond Website
Italian version
Part 1
Philanthropic Narrative Shaping
23 May 2020
In the first few months of 2020, business tycoon and billionaire
Bill Gates saw his popularity soar through the roof.
According to
YouGov, 58 percent of Americans
polled about Gates had a positive opinion of him, he is equally
liked by men and women, and both Boomers and Millennials adore him.
Gates' popularity might have increased due to a viral Netflix
documentary about his life being released in late 2019.
Combine that
positive press with a wave of media interviews seeking the guidance
of the man who "predicted"
the next major pandemic, and voila -
Bill Gates is a superhero here to save
the planet from impending doom.
Of
course, this rather cartoonish view ignores several incontrovertible
facts, and a few strong theories regarding Gates' true intentions.
First, the facts...
Bill Gates has used his immense wealth to garner
influence and media time, spreading his message of fixing global
health issues while he continues to make billions.
Using the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation to dole out grants and donations, Gates
has created a web of organizations who owe their budget to the
foundation or answer directly to Gates.
By tracing the Foundation's
investments and Gates' relationships we can see that nearly every
person involved in the 'fight against' COVID-19 is tied to Gates or
his foundation
by two degrees or less.
This
gives Bill Gates and his foundation an unchallenged influence over
the response to the pandemic.
Equally worrisome is Gates' call for
global lockdown until the entire world has been
vaccinated and
given a digital certificate to prove immunity.
Now, the theories:
when taking a careful listen to several speeches and statements made
by Gates, it becomes clear that he has a penchant for discussing
reducing population growth.
Despite "fact checkers" claiming Gates'
words have been taken out of context, his words speak for
themselves. He believes
the population should be reduced or
prevented from growing, and he believes this can be done with
vaccines and healthcare...
As we attempt to
peel back the layers of PR stunts and
puff pieces fawning over Bill
Gates, we hope to illustrate that the man being propped up on the
global stage and sold to the people as their savior, is anything
but.
Despite the apparent growth in support for Bill Gates, there is
also evidence on social media that people are beginning to question
him and challenge the savior narrative.
This is the first step in
unraveling
Bill Gates' Web of Dark Money and Manipulation...
The Global Influence
of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
In 1994, the story
goes, Bill Gates asked his father, William Gates Sr., to help him
"improve reproductive and child health" by founding and leading the
William H. Gates Foundation.
Gates Sr. agreed and by 2000, the
Foundation was merged with the Gates Learning Foundation to become
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
According to the Foundation,
Bill Gates has
donated $36 billion of his
personal wealth to the foundation. The Foundation is estimated to be
valued at $46.8 billion.
For the last two decades the Foundation has invested in a range of
controversial companies and projects while pursuing their goal of
?'improving global health' and access to vaccines and reproductive
care.
This has all been done as part of Gates' plan to reshape his
public image as that of a friendly and kind billionaire whose only
aim is to "help" the world.
The reality is much more suspect...
Let's take, for
example, the Netflix documentary mentioned above,
Inside Bill's Brain:
Decoding Bill Gates.
Rather than being a genuine look at the life
and personality of Gates, the documentary failed to acknowledge
conflicts of interest which might portray the film - and Bill Gates
- in a different light.
In a recent explosive investigation
examining the reach of Gates' money, The Nation noted that,
"in the
first episode, director Davis Guggenheim underlines Gates's
expansive intellect by interviewing Bernie Noe, described as a
friend of Gates."
Bernie Noe goes on to tell of Gates reading 150 pages an
hour with 90 percent retention.
However,
The Nation reported,
"Guggenheim doesn't tell audiences that Noe is the principal of
Lakeside School, a private institution to which the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation has given $80 million."
Coincidentally, this is the
same school that the Gates' children attend.
Of
course, using the foundations wealth to influence media coverage is
not new for Bill Gates. Although The Guardian claims editorial
independence, their Global Development section is
funded in part by The Gates Foundation.
The foundation has also
,
In light of these investments it's easy to
understand how Gates could quickly organize a speaking tour of his
favorite media outlets.
Corporate media outlets are not the only beneficiaries of the Gates
foundation.
They have also invested in controversial technologies
and companies, including,
MintPress News
recently reported
on how the Gates Foundation helped
highly controversial
pharmaceutical and chemical giant Monsanto Corporation "gain
a stronger foothold in Africa."
MPN also notes
that the foundation
funded a,
"flawed
clinical trial of the HPV vaccine in India in
2009, where 23,000 impoverished girls aged 9-15 were exposed to
potentially lethal drugs without even their parents' consent,
leading to seven deaths."
In 2010, it was
also
reported that since 2007, Gates
had given $4.5 million to study geoengineering
methods for altering the stratosphere to reflect solar energy,
techniques to filter carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere,
and brightening ocean clouds.
Geoengineering is the deliberate mass
scale manipulation of the weather for the stated purpose of reducing
heating on the planet.
The
Guardian
previously noted
that Gates gives "an
undisclosed sum" to geoengineering proponent and Harvard professor
David Keith.
Gates also owns majority stake in Keith's geoengineering company,
Carbon Engineering...
Prominent geoengineering researcher
Ken Caldeira says he receives $375,000 a
year from Gates and works for
Intellectual Ventures, a private
geoengineering research company part-owned by Gates and run by
Nathan Myhrvold, former head of technology at Microsoft.
The Foundation has also
invested $10 million towards
developing antennas which will accelerate the roll out of
controversial 5th generation cellular technology, otherwise known as
5G.
The concerns around Bill Gates fortune and his use of the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation to influence pet projects is not the only
worry expressed by critics of the foundation.
The larger - and more
immediate - is that unelected billionaires like Gates are using
their fortunes to shape public policy using their philanthropic
foundations...
This method of investing billions of dollars in the
form of tax-deductible charity donations to private companies is
allowing Gates to shape policy and profit by holding stock in the
same companies supported by the Gates Foundation.
A
recent
investigation by The Nation
uncovered more than 19,000 charitable grants from the Gates
Foundation in the last two decades.
They also found $2 billion in
these tax-deductible charitable donations to private companies.
Companies receiving these donations include GlaxoSmithKline,
Unilever, IBM, and NBC Universal Media.
The Nation noted that the
Gates Foundation has given $250 million to media companies and
"other groups to influence the news."
The Nation found close to $250 million in charitable grants from the
Gates Foundation to companies in which the foundation holds
corporate stocks and bonds:
Merck, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline,
Vodafone, Sanofi, Ericsson, LG, Medtronic, Teva, and numerous
start-ups...
You might see the previous statement and ask,
"how can this be
legal? Is it not a conflict of interest to hold stock in a company
which you also give tax-free donations?"
The simple fact is there
are not rules or laws against doing exactly what the Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation are doing.
While some might argue that Bill
Gates' scheme is brilliant - donate your fortune by forming a
foundation which can give tax-deductible donations to companies you
partly own and reap profits while avoiding taxes - it is allowing
him to hide his money in a myriad of ways.
It has almost become
impossible to track every donation, investment, or other
partnership.
The Nation concluded,
"it is difficult to ignore the occasions where
their charitable activities seem to serve mainly private interests,
including theirs - supporting the schools their children attend, the
companies their foundation partly owns, and the special interest
groups that defend wealthy Americans - while generating billions of
dollars in tax savings."
Other notable facts from the investigation include that the Gates
Foundation's,
"$50 billion endowment has generated $28.5 billion in
investment income over the last five years" while only giving away
$23.5 billion in charitable grants.
Additionally, a 2007
LA Times investigation found that
the organization was involved in subprime mortgage loans and
for-profit hospitals which reportedly performed unneeded surgeries.
The Gates Foundation is also reportedly invested in chocolate
companies that use child labor.
It
would be a mistake to see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as
merely a vessel for a rich man to hide his money and reap
immeasurable profits.
No, the Foundation is "more than a collection
of grants and projects" says Dr David McCoy, a public health doctor
and researcher at University College London and an advisor to the
People's Health Movement.
McCoy says the Foundation
"operates
through an interconnected network of organizations and individuals
across academia and the NGO and business sectors" which allows Bill
Gates to "leverage influence" in a kind of "group think."
Part 2
The COVID-19
Operation
28 May 2020
Before we dive into the current COVID-19 crisis, a bit more
background on Gates is needed.
In the last piece we discussed the
history of the Gates Foundation's investments. What is important to
note is that by using the Foundation as the front organization,
Gates can donate and influence hospitals, universities, media,
governments, and health organizations.
The Foundation clearly has
the ability to shape the decisions made by some of the institutions
they fund, including when these decisions go against the desires of
the masses they claim to be helping.
For example, in
2017 Independent Science News
released a report
detailing how the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation paid PR firm
Emerging Ag $1.6 million to,
"recruit a covert
coalition of academics to manipulate a UN decision-making process
over gene drives."
Emails released by Freedom of Information Act Request reveal that
the Gates' recruitment effort was part of a plan to,
"fight back
against gene drive moratorium proponents."
Gene drives are a
controversial genetic extinction technology promoted as a way to
eliminate mosquitoes with malaria, agricultural pests, and invasive
species.
At the 2016
United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, 179 international
organizations called for a UN moratorium on gene drives.
The
opponents of this technology also circulated a letter,
"A
Call for Conservation with a Conscience - No Place for Gene Drives in
Conservation," signed by 30 environmental leaders
who called for a "halt to all proposals for the use of gene drive
technologies, but especially in conservation."
The Gates Foundation
is
heavily invested in gene driving technology
and was not happy to see a diverse and unified push-back
against gene driving.
The Foundation hired
Emerging Ag - who have
their own web of connections
to Big Pharma and
Big Ag - to shut down
the opponents of gene driving.
Emerging Ag was successful and the
moratorium was
shot down.
Coincidentally, in
2016, the US National Academy of Sciences released a report on gene
driving which was co-funded by the
Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA) and the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
DARPA is also invested in gene drive research.
As The Guardian
noted after the
release of the NAS report:
"The same US defense research
agency (DARPA) who paid for the NAS study have made it known
that they are going all-in on gene drive research and
development of 'robust' synthetic organisms.
There is good
reason to be worried."
Moreover, Jim
Thomas of the ETC Group, which monitors the impact of emerging
technologies and corporate strategies on biodiversity, agriculture
and human rights, told ISN that he believes gene drives are
potential biological weapons that could have a "disastrous" impact
on human life and food security.
"The fact that gene drive
development is now being primarily funded and structured by the US
military raises alarming questions about this entire field," he
stated.
Independent Science
News also noted:
"This is also not the first time
that the Gates Foundation has used academics to influence public
and private opinion on genetic engineering technologies, as
witnessed by its funding of the
Cornell Alliance for Science."
The private emails
obtained by Independent Science News add to the mountains of
evidence detailing how Gates is able to pressure organizations to
carry out his interests, and that of his foundation.
The Global Health Mafia
Considering these
alarming reports of Gates' influence on public health policy, it is
important to take a moment to examine the current response to
COVID-19.
When we look at the players and institutions involved,
do we see
Gates' influence and money?
If so, what does this mean for public
health?
Will Gates' mammoth influence and finances allow him to
personally direct the course of the COVID-19 recovery?
Let's start by
looking at Dr.
Anthony S. Fauci, Director of
National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National
Institutes of Health, and a leader in the fight against COVID-19.
Unfortunately, when it comes to Fauci and NIAID we clearly see the
influence of Bill Gates.
In 2010, NIAID and
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
announced their "Decade of Vaccines Collaboration,"
calling for coordination across the "international vaccine
community" and the creation of a "Global Vaccine Action Plan."
Dr. Fauci was appointed to the
Leadership Council of the partnership.
Similarly, Bill Gates has been
partnering with the NIH for
several
years.
In late April,
the news broke that Fauci's NIAID
donated a total of $7.4 million to research involving bat
coronaviruses.
The investments added fuel to the theory that
COVID-19 might be a bioengineered virus which was purposefully or
accidentally released from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan,
China.
The news of the funding begs the obvious question; did Gates'
money influence or fund the NIAID's coronavirus research?
Time will
tell...
Another important
player with connections to Gates is Dr. Deborah Birx, an American
physician and diplomat serving as the United States Global AIDS
Coordinator for Presidents
Barack Obama and
Donald Trump since 2014.
She is currently the
Coronavirus Response Coordinator for the Trump
Administration's White House Task Force.
Birx also sits on the
Board of The Global Fund, an
organization which was promised a
$750 million investment by the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2012.
The Global Fund also
features board member Kieran Daly, the Deputy Director of Global
Policy and Advocacy for the Gates Foundation.
"The Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation is a key partner of the Global Fund, providing cash
contributions, actively participating on its board and committees,
and supporting the Global Fund's advocacy, communications and
fundraising efforts," the
Global Fund states.
The John Hopkins
University has been an equally important member of the global
response to COVID-19.
The university's
calculations of global infection and death rates
are commonly cited in mainstream media. Yet, once again, we find the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been
investing in John
Hopkins for two decades.
Finally, it was
recently reported that the
organization known as the Wellcome Trust has partnered with the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation and MasterCard to "catalyze the initial
work" of the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator.
The Accelerator is
supposed to accelerate and evaluate,
"new and repurposed drugs and
biologics to treat patients with COVID-19 in the immediate term."
What was not mentioned is that the Gates Foundation has been a "Trustee"
of the Wellcome Trust for several years
Interestingly, in 2017,
Mark
Henderson, Director of Communications for Wellcome Trust
participated in a panel called "Deep
Dive: Preventing Pandemics."
Dr. Anthony Fauci
also participated in the panel discussion.
One could chalk up
Fauci and Wellcome Trust's involvement with a panel about pandemics
as perfectly reasonable - after all, these are professionals who are
focused on global health.
However, to ignore that Bill Gates'
fingerprints are all over the global health industry would be a
mistake.
Based on The Gates
Foundation's track record of hiring PR firms to shut down detractors
or using their money to influence institutions, one could be
forgiven for assuming that the foundation would not be high on the
list of potential leaders for a public health crisis.
Unfortunately,
as of May 2020, Bill Gates and his Foundation are still being
promoted as heroes in the fight against COVID-19.
Who Is Running the WHO?
Since the outbreak
of COVID-19, both Bill Gates and the World Health Organization
(WHO) have
stepped onto the center stage as the world looks to them for
answers.
By now, it is common knowledge that the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation is the number one non-state donor to the WHO.
The
United States has been the top state donor but that may change under
the Trump administration. Gates was also the first non-state
individual to give a keynote address to the WHO general assembly.
According to a
report by Politico, Bill Gates'
opinion (and money) has so much influence on the WHO that officials
privately call it "the Bill Chill."
Sixteen officials speaking on
the condition of anonymity told Politico that Gates has an out-sized
influence on the politics of the WHO and few dare challenge him.
"He
is treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at
the G20," a Geneva-based NGO representative stated.
The accusations of
Gates' influence were seconded by Foreign Affairs when they
reported that,
"few policy
initiatives or normative standards set by the World Health
Organization are announced before they have been casually,
unofficially vetted by Gates Foundation staff."
The WHO's current
Director General is Tedros Adhanom, a former Health Minister of
Ethiopia and a physician.
During his tenure as Minister of Health of
Ethiopia, Tedros collaborated with the Clinton Foundation and the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to
work on vaccines, among other
health measures.
Politico reported that prior to Tedros being
selected for the WHO position in 2017 Gates was accused of
supporting Tedros and using his influence to help win the
nomination.
While most of the
member country delegates expressed their belief that Gates is well
intentioned, some feared that the Gates Foundation's money comes
from "big business" and could,
"serve as a Trojan horse for corporate
interests to undermine WHO's role in setting standards and shaping
health policies."
The most important
takeaway is that the fees paid by WHO member countries account for
less than a quarter of the $4.5 billion biennial budget - leaving
Gates, governments, and other foundations to fill the gap.
These
donations are allocated for specific projects and the WHO cannot
decide how to use them. In the case of the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, those funds typically go towards vaccine programs.
No matter which way
you approach the solutions being presented as the answer to the
COVID-19 pandemic you will find Bill Gates' fingerprints.
Repeatedly
he has used his money and influence to profit and steadily gain
power without ever being elected to political office.
Part 3
Health
Surveillance, Event 201 and the Rockefeller Connection
29 May 2020
Lockdowns, Contact Tracing, Digital
Certificates, and Vaccines
Over the last four months Bill Gates has made dozens of media
appearances where he has called for several controversial
"solutions" to COVID-19.
Gates says these proposals must be implemented before society can go
back to "normal." From calling for
extended lock downs, health
surveillance (aka
contact tracing) and
digital certificates.
The science behind
the lock downs has been called into question numerous times by
health experts.
Most recently, Michael Levitt, a Stanford University
professor who predicted the initial trajectory of the pandemic, stated
that he believed the lockdown was a "huge
mistake" and may have actually cost lives.
TLAV
has also
exposed contract tracing and the
call for an "army" of people to monitor the public as an expansion
of surveillance.
Coincidentally, it was reported just this week that
the Gates Foundation recently
invested hundreds of millions of dollars into tech
companies like Google, who may end up building the
contact tracing infrastructure.
What Gates
describes as "digital certificates" sounds identical to what some
are calling "immunity passports," a form of digital identification
that will hold an individual's health data, as well as their vaccine
status.
During a Reddit AMA,
Gates stated,
"Eventually we will
have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been
tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it."
What Gates describes
- a digital certificate to prove who has
been vaccinated - sounds similar to the recent calls for passengers
to use
immunity passports
before being allowed to fly.
However, Gates' statements and philanthropy reveal his primary focus
in the "fight for global health:"
the promotion of vaccinations for
the entire world.
Rather than focus on clean water, access to
housing, or any number of other proposals to help the world's
poorest, Gates believes that access to vaccines is most pressing.
Long before
COVID-19 the Gates Foundation has been involved in
funding controversial vaccine efforts in Africa and India.
A 2015 report
titled,
Philanthropic Power and Development - Who shapes the
Agenda?, examines the influence of global
philanthropy and provides examples of the undue influence Gates and
others can wield.
The report outlines much of what we describe in
Part 1 of this investigation, including how,
"through the
placement of Foundation staff in decision-making bodies of
international organizations and global health partnerships" the
Gates Foundation influences and guides public health policy.
The
Gates Foundation is a board member not only of GAVI, but also of,
-
the
Global Fund
-
the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health
-
the Medicines for Malaria Venture
-
the Roll Back Malaria
Partnership
-
the TB Alliance
-
the Stop TB Partnership,
...and many
others.
The investigation
also provides detail on Gates' investments in vaccines and his
connections with vaccine manufacturers.
As reported in
Part 2 of this
investigation, in 2010 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
launched the "Decade of Vaccines" and called for a "Global Vaccine
Action Plan."
They also helped created the public-private
partnership known as
GAVI, or the Global Alliance for Vaccines and
Immunization.
"The Gates
Foundation provided an initial five-year pledge of US$750 million as
seed money to launch this global public-private partnership in 2000
and has remained its driving force and its largest donor," the
report states.
"Between 2000 and 2014 the Gates Foundation
contributed 23 percent (US$2,287.94 million) of the total donor
funding of around US$9.9 billion."
The report noted
that researchers have been critical of GAVI for following a
"Gates-approach" on global health challenges,
"focusing on
disease-specific vertical health interventions (through vaccines),
instead of horizontal and holistic approaches (e.g., health system
strengthening)."
Additionally, there is evidence that the Gates
Foundation's support of GAVI has encouraged vaccine manufacturers to
produce specific vaccines resulting in,
"over $1 billion to Pfizer
and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)."
The
non-governmental organization Doctors without Borders (MSF) has also
questioned the GAVI Alliance's overall impact on vaccine
affordability, stating that,
"the cost to fully immunize a child was
68 times more expensive in 2014 than it was in 2001."
MSF also calls
for GAVI to exclude pharmaceutical companies from their board of
directors in order to reduce conflicts of interest.
One of the most important takeaways from the investigation is that
the Gates Foundation operates a revolving door between Foundation
staff and Big Pharma companies like Merck and GSK.
The report
provides several examples of this revolving door, including Trevor Mundel, the president of the Global Health Division of the Gates
Foundation, previously worked with Novartis, Pfizer and Parke-Davis.
Mundel's predecessor, Tachi Yamada, had been an executive and board
member of GSK.
Kim Bush, responsible for partnership initiatives
with healthcare for the Gates Foundation,
formerly worked for Baxter International Healthcare
Corporation.
Penny Heaton, Director of Vaccine Development at the
Gates Foundation since 2013, worked before for Novartis Vaccines and
Diagnostics and for Merck & Co.
The Gates Foundation
and mRNA Vaccines
Another interesting note from the report is how the Foundation has a
$52 million equity stage in German pharmaceutical company, CureVac.
The collaboration is meant to speed up the development of messenger
RNA (mRNA) vaccines against various diseases, including rotavirus,
HIV and respiratory syncytial virus.
The mRNA-vaccine has been discussed as a potential candidate for the
COVID-19 vaccine. Specifically, biotech company Moderna Therapeutics
is leading the way for mRNA therapeutics and potential vaccines.
Moderna's RNA vaccine program
has received $100 million in
funding from the Gates Foundation. Moderna's controversial mRNA
vaccine was also developed with a
$25 million grant from the
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA).
As
TLAV reported, Donald Trump also
appointed Dr. Moncef Slaoui - a former Big Pharma exec who up until
recently sat on the board of Moderna - as his "Vaccine Czar" to lead
"Operation
Warp Speed," the Trump administration's effort to fast
track a vaccine by the end of 2020.
In 2016, Slaoui was
appointed to the Board of Directors of Moderna
Therapeutics.
He resigned upon being appointed to
a position in the current US administration.
TLAV writer Whitney
Webb
recently reported on Moderna's
role in the fight against COVID-19 and their connections to the
Gates Foundation:
"The Coalition for Epidemic
Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) announced that it would fund
three separate programs in order to promote the development of a
vaccine for the new coronavirus responsible for the current
outbreak.
CEPI - which describes itself as
"a partnership of public, private, philanthropic and civil
organizations that will finance and co-ordinate the development
of vaccines against high priority public health threats" - was
founded in 2017 by the governments of Norway and India along
with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation.
Its massive funding and close connections to public,
private and non-profit organizations have positioned it to be
able to finance the rapid creation of vaccines and widely
distribute them.
CEPI's
recent announcement revealed that it would fund two
pharmaceutical companies - Inovio Pharmaceuticals and Moderna
Inc. - as well as Australia's University of Queensland, which
became
a partner of CEPI early last
year.
Notably, the two pharmaceutical companies chosen have
close ties to and/or strategic partnerships with DARPA and are
developing vaccines that controversially involve genetic
material and/or gene editing.
The University of Queensland also
has ties to DARPA, but those ties are not related to the
university's biotechnology research, but instead
engineering and
missile development."
Webb goes on to detail how Moderna is working with the U.S. NIH to
develop a vaccine for the new coronavirus and how the project will
be entirely funded by CEPI, which in turn was founded and funded by
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
It
should come as no surprise that Bill Gates is now openly
supporting RNA vaccines.
The
development of these vaccines - and the overall effort of
Operation
Warp Speed - is ignoring the already shaky protocols and safety
measures for manufacturing vaccines.
Operation Warp Speed and the
subsequent human trials involving 100,000 volunteers,
"will compress
what is typically
10 years of vaccine development
and testing into a matter of months."
The rush to get the
public a vaccine which has not been properly tested is even more
worrisome considering Gates' recent statements about the need to
vaccinate the entire world's population.
In a
blog on his website, Gate states,
"The goal is
to pick the one or two best vaccine constructs and vaccinate the
entire world - that's 7 billion doses if it is a single-dose
vaccine, and 14 billion if it is a two-dose vaccine."
Gates' push for a mandatory vaccine will likely heavily impact the
decisions of the WHO, the CDC, and other global health organizations
which he funds, influences, or is a board member of.
Gates' funding of a "quantum-dot
tattoo" that can store vaccination records has
done little to quell dissent and fear of his true motivations.
Despite the heralding of Gates as a hero who has saved millions of
lives, the thought of forcing vaccinations has sparked a growing
opposition to vaccines and concerns about their safety.
Whether it's
the
CDC whistleblower,
Dr. Andrew Zimmerman's
testimony
about the safety of vaccines, or simply the support of freedom of
choice - people around the world are skeptical of the safety of the
vaccines and the influence of Big Pharma and are not likely to
accept a mandated vaccine quietly.
The Rockefeller
Connection, Lock Step, and Event 201
As we wrap up our
investigation into Bill Gates and consider his ulterior motives,
it's important to take stock of the company that he keeps and the
philosophies which he has promoted.
The report,
Philanthropic Power and Development - Who shapes the agenda?, also
provides an important background on the origins of modern
philanthropy and the ability of that money to influence global
health, food, and agriculture policy.
The researchers outline the
role of the Carnegie and
Rockefeller dynasties in the creation of
American philanthropy:
"The roots of
modern philanthropy can be traced back to the beginning of the
20th century in the United States when business tycoons John D.
Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie set up the first large American
foundations, primarily as a way to shield some of their income
from taxation but also as a way to garner prestige and influence
in the US and world affairs.
In 1911 Andrew
Carnegie established the Carnegie Corporation of New York and gave
it an endowment of US$125 million, making it the largest single
philanthropic trust ever established up to that time.
A year before,
Carnegie, who made his fortune in the steel industry, founded the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which became one of the
leading foreign policy think tanks in the USA."
Ironically, the formation of the Rockefeller Foundation sounds
eerily similar to Gates' own story of facing antitrust and monopoly
accusations during his time at Microsoft and then going on to found
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as a way to rewrite history
and create a hero persona around himself.
"The
Rockefeller Foundation was established in 1913, two years after
the US Supreme Court ruled that John D. Rockefeller's Standard
Oil Company, was an illegal monopoly and ordered it to be broken
up into smaller companies.
The dissolution of the then world's
largest oil company made its founder and major shareholder John
D. Rockefeller the richest man in the world.
With the
establishment of his foundation, he could insulate a large part
of his fortune from income and inheritance taxes."
Philanthropy and
tax evasion are not the only commonalities between Bill Gates and
the Rockefellers.
According to genealogy records, Gates is
related to the Rockefeller family via Nelson Rockefeller,
a former Vice President of the U.S. However, the connections go
beyond being associated by distant relatives.
Both the Rockefeller
Foundation and he Gates Foundation seemingly "predicted" a scenario
much like the pandemic unfolding in front of our eyes.
On October 18,
2019, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with the John
Hopkins Center for Health Security and the World Economic Forum on a
high-level pandemic exercise known as Event 201.
Gates is a long
time "Agenda
Contributor" for the WEF and has donated to John Hopkins.
Event 201 simulated how the world would respond to a coronavirus
pandemic which swept around the planet. The simulation imagined 65
million people dying, mass lock downs, quarantines, censorship of
alternative viewpoints under the guise of fighting "disinformation,"
and even floated the idea of arresting people who question the
pandemic narrative.
Coincidentally, one
of the players involved with Event 201 was Dr. Michael Ryan, the
head of the
World Health Organization's team
responsible for the international containment and treatment of
COVID-19.
Ryan called for looking into families to find potentially
sick individuals and isolate them from their families.
The Rockefeller Foundation imagined a similar scenario in 2010 as
part of their document, "Scenarios
for the Future of Technology and International Development."
This document includes a scenario called "Lockstep", which describes
a pandemic sweeping the world and resulting in more authoritarian
control from governments in developed countries.
The document also
describes the response to the pandemic as follows:
"During the
pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their
authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the
mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at
the entries to communal spaces like train stations and
supermarkets.
Even after the pandemic faded, this more
authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their
activities stuck and even intensified."
In
the imagined scenario the Rockefeller foundation predicts that,
"scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to
detect abnormal behavior that may indicate 'antisocial intent'."
Interestingly, the
Transportation Security Administration recently
announced plans to check temperatures at American
airports.
The document goes on to describe how,
eventually, the people of the world tire of the control and civil
unrest would begin:
"By 2025, people
seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and
letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever
national interests clashed with individual interests, there was
conflict.
Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and
coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their
status and opportunities slip away - largely in developing
countries - incited civil unrest."
While it might be
convenient to dismiss
Event 201 and Lock Step as a coincidence, it
would be short-sighted to ignore them considering the Gates and
Rockefeller Foundations are heavily involved in funding the global
health industry.
While theories abound over whether the COVID-19
pandemic was planned or engineered in someway, as if to mimic the
plans discussed in Event 201 and Lock Step, hard evidence if
currently lacking.
Still, we should not dismiss them completely.
Reducing the
Population Via Eugenics
The Gates and Rockefeller dynasties are also united by their common
interest in eugenics, the debunked science which promoted the idea
that people of "good birth" should be encouraged to reproduce while
those with "bad genes" should be discouraged from breeding or
sterilized altogether.
The
science was developed by Francis
Galton as a strategy for improving the human race. The idea was
extremely popular in America before the Nazis embraced the doctrine
and took it to the extreme.
Eugenics was also extremely popular with the Rockefeller family.
A
report from the Hudson Institute
notes,
"the first
American foundations were deeply immersed in eugenics the effort to
promote the reproduction of the fit and to suppress the reproduction
of the unfit."
The report states that the Rockefellers and other
early American philanthropists believed in "philanthropic
eugenics," the idea that they could use their money to create
foundations which would promote the philosophy of eugenics...
The Rockefeller Foundation and family helped fund researchers at the
Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes in Germany who were involved in the Nazi
sterilization programs, funded the Eugenics Records Office, and many
other programs promoting population control.
In 1952, after the
Nazis eugenics experiments were widely known,
John D. Rockefeller
III helped created the Population Council to promote eugenics
without the baggage of the term.
In
his book, Showing Up for Life, Bill Gates' father, William H. Gates
II, wrote about his admiration for the Rockefeller's and their
philanthropy:
"A lesson we learned from studying
and working with the Rockefellers is that to succeed in pursuing
audacious goals you need like-minded partners with whom to
collaborate.
And we learned
that such goals are not prizes claimed by the short-winded. The
Rockefellers stay with tough problems for generations."
It
appears that Gates II was a supporter of the Rockefellers eugenics
philosophy as he served as the head of Planned Parenthood for a
time.
Planned Parenthood was funded in part by a
$1.5 million donation from the
Rockefeller-created Population Council.
Gates II was preceded at
Planned Parenthood by Alan Guttmacher, who simultaneously served as
the
Director of the American Eugenics Society.
This interest in
eugenics may have gone back three generations to Bill Gates'
grandfather, William H. Gates, as the American Eugenics Society did
have a member by the name of
"William H. Gates" in the 1920s.
The William H. Gates listed on the
AES roster was listed as "professor" and there is a
professor William H. Gates from Louisiana State
University but there is not yet evidence that
Gates' grandfather is the same
William H. Gates.
Regardless, the present day Gates family has a habit of spending
time around their fellow philanthropic eugenicists.
In December
2001, William H. Gates received the inaugural "Andrew
Carnegie Medals of Philanthropy" for his charity
work.
Gates Sr. received his award alongside Walter H. and Leonore
Annenberg on behalf of the Annenberg Foundation, Brooke Astor, Irene
Diamond, David and Laurance S. Rockefeller on behalf of the
Rockefeller family, George Soros and Ted Turner.
Although Bill Gates
is not pictured, the Carnegie Corporation mentions that the
senior
Gates was representing the "Gates family."
More recently, in
2010 Bill Gates was seen with fellow billionaires in an event which
was described by the corporate media as,
"They're called the
Good
Club - and they want to save the world."
The Guardian
reported:
"This is the
Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of
billionaire philanthropists who recently held their first and
highly secretive meeting in the heart of New York City.
The names of some of the members
are familiar figures:
-
Bill Gates
-
George Soros
-
Warren Buffett
-
Oprah Winfrey
-
Michael Bloomberg
-
David Rockefeller
-
Ted
Turner
But there are others, too, like business giants Eli and
Edythe Broad, who are equally wealthy but less well known.
All
told, its members are worth $125bn."
The Guardian also notes that Rockefeller, Gates, and Buffet
organized the meeting.
The
Wall Street Journal
reported
that the meeting was focused on slowing population growth, a
euphemism for eugenics. The appearance of Ted Turner at both the
2001 meeting and the 2010 meeting should not be a surprise as he has
also been a
vocal proponent of population control.
It
should also be noted that despite the denials from Bill Gates, he
was also an associate of sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein. TLAV
writer
Whitney Webb previously documented the relationship
and the attempts to conceal it.
Coincidentally, Epstein was also
exposed as a
proponent of eugenics.
Will The Real Bill
Gates Stand Up?
Now that we have arrived to the end of this investigation into the
lives, finances, and history of Bill Gates, we must stop to reflect
on his motivations.
Is Bill Gates the lovable billionaire
philanthropist who could save the world from COVID-19?
Is he the
financier of dangerous vaccine trials?
Is he motivated by a desire
to help humanity or is he motivated by a debunked philosophy or race
science and eugenics?
If we are to judge an individual by the company they keep, by the
projects they finance, and by
the words they say, then it
should be clear that,
the Gates family has a history of promoting and
supporting eugenics...
Armed with this knowledge we can take a fresh
look at Bill Gates' philanthropy and come to understand that he
might have motives which are very different from his public
statements.
The fact is that Bill Gates runs in elite circles where the
promotion of,
eugenics, population control, sterilization, and other
social engineering tactics,
...are the norm.
This man is being propped
up in front of the world as the hero we desperately need to free us
from the grips of the COVID-19 pandemic.
If his PR stunts and
philanthropy succeed in convincing the people that he is the 'savior'
they have been searching for, we are likely to face a future of,
-
contact tracing surveillance
-
digital certificates to travel
-
forced
vaccinations
-
tracking and restrictions of all movement
-
forced
quarantines...
The only thing that stands between Gates and his agenda are the free
hearts and minds of the world...
Our time is short. We must get
organized, share this vital information, and
#ExposeBillGates...
|
