|
from UFOEvidence Website recovered through WayBackMachine Website
But this is the end-game of an age, be certain.
The lumbering lunatic caricature of the hapless hero with a thousand hang-ups is over: mark it well. Yet everyone knows that there is something grand about to happen!
There is a new human emerging, a new planetary civilization on the horizon.
We probe the elastic membrane of our racial imprints for the adequate maps and metaphors, the comprehensive unifying vision of the way beyond war, want, primitive competition, and the inevitability of death. But we reject partial solutions grasped at in the criteria vacuum conflict between religion, philosophy, science and new age hope. Yet there is an almost unthinkable new-world-view dawning that releases us into that new era beyond religion and beyond the old new age.
The background for the new paradigm comes from:
That is the true "natural history of the gods" that Joseph Campbell failed.
A half million pieces of archaeological proof is corroborated by the evidence for Planet X/Nibiru as developed by NASA, JPL, the Naval Observatory and various astronomers.
Its gravitational pull on Uranus and
Neptune flags it in our solar system. The mitochondrial DNA "search
for Eve" and anthropology's "out of Africa" data placing our genesis
in Central Africa 250,000 years ago, as well as strong evidence from
many field of study, corroborate the ancient records.
The traditional belief has been that the "gods" must have been imaginary because the deeds (flight through the atmosphere and space, use of weapons akin to atomic bombs and star-war lasers, the ability to communicate over long distances, the ability to create humans) ascribed to them were utterly fantastic.
That reasoning has been vaporized by our
own current technological capabilities. Reaching the point in our
technological knowledge that allows us to understand genetic
engineering, lasers, interplanetary rocketry, electronic
communication, has furnished the keys to the integration of our past
with our present encompassed in the concept of generic humanity, the
critical factor for planetary unification. In this perspective, in
every area, it becomes clear that almost every previous
philosophical, religious, metaphysical and scientific worldview, has
been partially correct.
Joseph Campbell's gods are unmasked.
We were literally invented for the Nefilim' pragmatic purposes as gold-mining and agricultural slave animals, became their serfs and limited partners with kings as local go-between foremen after they almost wiped us out in the Flood.
Once they had phased off the planet and
left us on our own, we began to look to charismatic saviors,
political and eventually "religious", to lead us in the same
submissive way we had formerly looked to our Nefilim masters. I feel
fortunate to be living in and contributing to an age when we are
emerging from racial adolescence.
As we develop over time, more precociously than they perhaps anticipated, some of us, at least, are recognized for a growing potential, elevated in status and function, sometimes even taken as sexual partners. Occasionally the offspring of such a marriage, like the king, Gilgamesh, who knew his mother to be pure Nefilim and his father human, demanded the rights of the Nefilim.
Gilgamesh literally demanded immortality
on a purely legal basis as a demi-god, a half-god. Surplus of us are
pushed into the outback and develop our own adaptive native cultures
from scratch. The out-backers retain some of the old memories from
the masters' centers and hand them down as venerable, important,
"sacred".
This "out-law" culture spreads over the globe carrying with it the ancient history of our beginnings and the watershed events (the Orinoco Indians knew the Flood story. The American Indian cultures had 42 versions of it) and the veneration of the Nefilim Goddess Mother, Ninhursag, the Nefilim geneticist who literally made us.
Gradually over time the two traditions
con-fuse. But the "in-law” culture, still in direct contact with the
Nefilim, know the masters to be flesh and blood humanoids and
definitely in control. Kings are put in charge when the populations
get large and the candidates for this foreman position are often
very capable but aware of the danger of mistakes.
The Sumerian word for worship meant "work for", serve. And, from the beginning that we did, including acting our servant parts in the palace serving the masters the coq au vin, the beer, the wines they loved, the fatted calf, the bull and grains.
When our females became attractive to the Nefilim males and they began to collect harems of these desirable female slaves and beget children by them we became too much of a nuisance-threat and the Nefilim attempted to wipe out all of us in the Flood and then rethought their decision.
Having decided to keep us as valuable in
rebuilding their centers after the devastating Flood, they taught us
"crash courses" in civilization and technology as necessary for
specific functions, farming, husbandry, textile production, food
preparation, beer and wine production, mining, construction, slave
raiding, scribing, keeping the calendar, knowing how to tell when
the home planet, Nibiru, would again pass within the inner solar
system and the Nefilim return.
The laments are still engraved in the clay tablets,
We went into grief, despair, denial. We blamed ourselves and looked to the sky for their return.
The good kings did their best, the leaders sometimes were told to go up the mountain to get some instructions long distance from space or make a wooden box, lined with metal just so, to act as a receiver.
Finally we were alone and in confusion, beginning to argue and fight over who still knew what the master really said, really meant, what we really should be doing if he did show up.
Service at their table transmuted into ritual sacrifice of food, attendance at their baths turned into bathing and clothing of surrogate statues of them and gradually the routine services turned into cargo-cult rituals and their palaces became empty temples.
And the less than good kings began to take advantage, began to swagger. Sometimes they got away with it on their own. Sometimes the people, in desperation, raised their king to a symbolic god. And the god-king and the seed of the notion of the divine right of kings became. And the chief servants went along with it because it was to their advantage to become known as priests or to preserve their jobs and status.
And those who had been taught, seeing
that the advanced knowledge of technologies and science and the
arts, learned as part of their function, of writing, mathematics,
astronomy, science, metallurgy, and the fine crafts in general was
being lost set an agenda to preserve it. In the face of
misunderstanding and threat they disguised it, withdrew it, hid it.
And the "occult" became.
Remembering the Nefilim males'
attraction to our young women, we began to cut their hearts out on
top of the empty pyramidal palaces in a collective craven pleading
shriek to the heavens from whence they had come and gone. But that
unspeakable and unappreciated horror could not last: we began to
doubt, to entertain frightening cynicism, secret thoughts of
independence and why bother.
Eventually, we simply began to forget.
It is the classic syndrome of the dysfunctional family on a planetary scale.
Down there slaving in the hot gold mines. And hell became. Where is the god and the good things that come from the god?
Up there in the sky. And heaven became...
Down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate tradition of what the god intended, what rules to follow, what we should be doing to demonstrate we are still loyal and docile servants. Sometimes we just kill each other over it.
And persecutions, Crusades, Jihads,
Inquisitions, evil empires, the saved and the damned, the martyr,
the infidel, the saint, the protestant, the fundamentalist, the
atheist, became.
The convolution, sublimation, reverse
anthropomorphizing (anyone have a better term for that? maybe
anthropodeification?) intellectualizing, abstraction, that the
notion of deity has gone through over the last 3000 years is, to be
wryly positive about it, a tribute to human genius...
Robert Dunnell, a respected veteran archaeologist, said in an article in the January issue of Archaeology magazine entitled Hope for An Endangered Science, in 1989,
Most archaeologists would rather just dig and report and ignore the problems.
Even those who are inclined to deal with the critical issues raised by the rapidly accumulating evidence for a new interpretation of the history of our species unfortunately tend to preclude even the possibility of the Nefilim presence.
They instinctively realize that any
retreat from the fundamental postulate that gods were myth,
imaginary, unreal figments of naive human minds means revolution.
For any serious scholar to even broach the possibility of "alien
intervention" the price is most often peer persecution and even the
ruin of one's career.
At this point in time we quite clearly are reaching the point of radical paradigm shift.
When we get this close to a paradigm shift changeover point everybody can feel it coming in their bones, in their genes, can almost taste it even though they may not be able to articulate it.
So the predictions and
the guesses and the prognostications about what the new paradigm
really is are rife and various.
Terrence Mc Kenna, having programmed the
cycles of the I Ching into the computer (Time Wave Zero) can see a
startling slide into novelty coming rapidly as we approach the year
2012 and sometimes says the
paradigm shift will be a transcendental
dimensional shift, that the world as we know it will end and
sometimes that he is not really sure. He, in one sense, is using the
I Ching as a doomsday machine.
Some say that the paradigm shift will be
more political, the manifestation of a
new world order leading to
harmony and peace.
I suggest that what we are witnessing and experiencing, in the largest perspective, is nothing less than the dawning of a planetary, racial, genetic enlightenment, that these gods, we and our children, wear designer genes, that we can and should claim our planetary birthright, restore our true collective history in the final dispelling of the haze of racial amnesia.
We can integrate our indigenous heritage
and become one with the earth again at the same time as we integrate
our off planet heritage and move off into space.
The glimpses of glory are intuitive projections of the facets of the character and personality of the new planetary human and the new civilization already brimming over the horizon. The key to graceful passage is an unassailable integrity, both racial and personal, springing from the genetic enlightenment that erases the painful scar of the subservient, godspell slave brand from our personal genetic web.
We need, respectfully but firmly, to
finally wash the ancient dyes of subjection now sublimated to a
focus on a pitifully anthropomorphic projection in the sky from the
tapestries of our cultures.
Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of racial adolescent rebellion and questioning of the authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of the particular local Nefilim "god" of the Hebrew tribe and Christianity, Yahweh, who was, by his own admission, jealous (I am the Lord, your god, and you shall not go over the border and work for my brothers and cousins...) and clearly male chauvinist and disposed to violence in dealing with his human slaves if the high-tech tricks of magic and high wattage loudspeakers to which he resorted to intimidate them didn't work.
The new paradigm, once the godspell is
dispelled, simply frees us to go one on one with the universe and to
seek directly whatever unthinkable or thinkable ultimate principle
is behind it.
By the turn of our century, scholars had become aware of the world-wide similarity of the traditions of remote antiquity in all regions of the earth dealing with the gods and their deeds. It had become incontrovertibly clear that the basic themes and motifs of human mythology were universal and even the genealogies of the gods were the same the world over.
Not only were the religions of the world similar but it had also been established that much of the teaching and traditions and history of the relatively recent Hebrew religion, considered by its adherents and the offshoot Christian religion to have been revealed directly to the prophets and writers of the Old Testament, actually had been derived from the much earlier and more developed cultures of the Middle East as far back as the Sumerian civilization.
The Old Testament suddenly had to be
viewed as a relatively recent Reader's Digest type synopsis of the
detailed history of the race as known and recorded by the
Sumerians,
Babylonians, Hittites, Akkadians,
Egyptians and other cultures.
These discoveries were a tremendous revelation yet deeply puzzling
and disconcerting.
This set the stage for an explanation of
all of mythology and religion, from primitive or ancient to present,
in psychological, psychoanalytic and even psychopathological terms.
He conceived of such a work as both a systematic identification and classification as well as the discovery of an evolution of the "visionary world of the gods" that might well exhibit scientific laws, indeed as the beginning of a "science of the roots of revelation". It might be termed a sociobiology of revelation. But, never reaching a point where he could acknowledge the "gods" real, as actual history, he could only hold that their source had to lie in the psychology of the minds of men, even going so far as to say that there was madness in the claims of the god-kings of Egypt.
Seeing no other alternative, he could only recommend a constructive exaltation of what he considered the "mythological" portion of man's nature. Campbell's ultimate goal was to develop an encyclopedic "creative mythology" according to what he understood to be the "laws and hypotheses of the science of the unconscious".
In effect he was trying to make sense
out of a historical phenomenon which was full of deep contradictions
and mind boggling facts and seeming madness by psychoanalyzing the
mess. In doing so he had to accept
the Darwinian concept of
evolution from less complex forms to the more complex.
Amazingly he answered, although local quaint myth may have had its origin in that way, it was a diffusion of the stunning, sudden high culture from the "little Sumerian mud garden" that was the source of "the whole cultural syndrome that has since constituted the germinal unit of all of the high civilizations of the world"
If even the details of the genealogies of the "gods" were the same the world over it must have been a process of diffusion rather than local development. He went as far as to identify Sumeria as the primary mythogenic zone, a source of the origination of the universal mythic themes.
But having reached that startlingly
acute insight, he nevertheless had to go on the explain the gods as
mythic archetypes in psychological terms - how else can you explain
something that you are convinced is unreal?
Read it for yourself. Impeccable logic, wrong premise.
The Jaynes-Campbell syndrome, the most
extreme explanation one can advance if one starts from the
unquestioned assumption that the gods must have been unreal, marks
the last step before the resolution afforded by Sitchin's thesis
which puts the last pieces of the puzzle of our history in place.
The Vedanta tradition speaks of humans in the remote past contemporary with primitive human and ape species. The focus of their evidence is on conclusively demonstrating that the theory of Darwinian evolution that requires the more complex to arise from the less complex is false as have other authors.
In this vein, they also document the
evidence for the very strong possibility that primitive human
species are still living on this planet in various remote parts of
the world and present evidence of high-tech items found in very
ancient strata. Their work is evenhanded and thorough and they
acknowledge their sincere, long range intent is obviously to
ultimately demonstrate the historical validity of the Vedanta
worldview in a second book.
The Nefilim selected a humanoid type with which to fuse their genetic code or part of it, enough to raise the humanoid species to a level of intelligent competence to work as gold miners. Sitchin has indicated that the humanoid type chosen was Homo Erectus.
Even if there were more advanced,
physiologically identical human types contemporary with Homo Erectus
250,000 years ago, it does not, by that fact, contradict Sitchin's
thesis. It does raise a question as to whether the Nefilim might
have actually used a more advanced human type much closer to us to
merge their genes with rather than Homo Erectus.
But, again, this does not seem logical
on the basis of why bother if a more advanced but not up to standard
type was available. And, in the last analysis, the records say
nothing whatsoever about any human type then that would have been
equal to us now.
For whatever reason, Cremo and Thompson have chosen to ignore Sitchin's work completely in Forbidden Archaeology; there is no reference either in the Bibliography or the Index. I think that this is significant if only that the exhaustive 900 page work purports to be a thorough coverage of the available material and the implication is that Sitchin's work is precluded as not worthy even of note.
In another, explicitly Vedantic context (Alien Identities), Thompson mentions Sitchin's work but I can find no instance where he associates the Vedantic gods in their vimanas, aircraft, with the Nefilim. It is worth noting, however, that since the Nefilim were in the area known as modern India, the Vedanta tradition is simply talking of them under a local name.
Perhaps a major contribution of
the
Vedanta tradition may eventually come from its preservation of a
very detailed account of the history of the indigenous human types
previous to the Nefilim genetic intervention..
He rejects that information on the basis of his own investigations which prompt him to claim that a planet in that orbit exploded forming the asteroid belt. When asked how a planet could explode he falls back on a hypothesis that has been tossed about for some time and which is highly theoretical to say the least.
Nevertheless he would agree that there is a very high probability that X/Nibiru is in our solar system.
He rejects the evidence on the cylinder seal VA/243 (below image) in the East German Museum that appears to quite clearly show our sun surrounded by various size disks correctly representing all the planets in our solar system including the tenth planet, Nibiru.
His reason for rejection: he has measured the diameters of all the disks and found some slight discrepancies in the diameters of some. Which means to a scale ratio of something like 1.6 billion to 1 on a 4500 year old carved stone cylinder seal...
Even the most advanced computerized
precision machining does not normally produce that kind of accuracy
especially in stone. It is interesting to see how different personal
orientations to the same topic will cause two associated experts to
radically disagree.
It has boiled down to four answers:
He never, to my knowledge, tries to discredit anyone's credentials or reputation.
He will debate, disagree, reject but he will not denigrate or attack someone's character. It's obvious that he is too much of a hot potato for any of the other explanations. He is standing there with seven volumes worth of deep information about who and what all the ancient first human civilizations said unanimously who that previous advanced civilization was from which they received the training in technology, learning, culture and science, where they came from, what they did, where they went.
Once one gets to that question and
answers it "Anunnaki/Nefilim", the game is over. Not only is it
having to accept someone else's thesis and recognize that yours is
subsumed by it but, once over the line, the paradigm shift required
by the ramifications is so profound that the difficulty of
acceptance is compounded by magnitudes.
You have to know that, if the Ph.D's, present heroic company obviously excepted, are entering the discussion, it has already been over for years and the lodge has voted to send a delegation of experts to make definitive pronouncements about what they'll claim they knew all along and to declare the new topic as "science".
But the process of coming around is
torturous, so painful to even watch. And don't go too fast, don't
embarrass or get ahead of the rest.
The new paradigm subsumes and completes those various pieces of discovery. I know personally many of these pioneering and, in the face of opposition and ridicule from the establishment, courageous thinkers and scientists, and find them, individually, to be persons of sincere conviction. It is sad that any less than the professional ideal prevails.
Consider what it would be like if all
these pioneering researchers were communicating and cooperating and
working toward a common goal rather than acting like pharmaceutical
researchers trying to beat each other to market with a new drug.
Their interpretations and opinions of the archaeological and historical data carry a great deal of weight because of their depth of research and scholarly approach. The reason for the attractiveness of their thesis is that it throws into perspective the neglected, even denied, status and role of women in history and points to a time in the past when, it is interpreted, there was equality of the sexes and peace among humans, looked to as a model for our time and our future.
Many in the Goddess movement view the
new paradigm with suspicion because they feel that it diminishes
what Maria Gimbutas has interpreted as the “supernatural" element in
the worship of the Goddess. But, on the basis of the truth, whatever
it turns out to be, sets you truly free, I suggest closer study
shows that the two paradigms mutually reinforce and the new paradigm
ultimately affords an even more profound meaning to the Goddess
concept.
Maria Gimbutas held that, so far, we
can't see evidence for the goddess cult much more than perhaps
25,000 years ago - although she "guessed" that it might go back as
far as the consensual date of the beginning of the Paleolithic era
some 500,000 years ago. I see no contradiction in any form of the
new paradigm by the evidence so far adduced in that regard.
And, by extension of this interpretation of the Goddess phenomenon as mythological, it becomes easy to conceive of the goddess phenomenon as a single continuum of gradual development centered on just one Goddess, from the earliest crude Paleolithic figurines through the millennia to the very detailed images of specific goddesses in the middle east and Crete.
An end result of these interpretations as mythic projection of the primitive, naive human psyche in an historical continuum is that the individual goddesses recognized over the millennia as distinct beings, often in very different contexts and times, often with very idiosyncratic differences between them, sometimes as different spouses of different male "gods", are freely and generally taken as simply different cultural names or aspects of the Goddess interpreted as an archetype.
Ultimately, the result is that the goddess movement tends to get
stuck in the Campbell half of the Jaynes-Campbell syndrome.
Both the "in-law" and the "out-law" cultures would
remember her equally. Gradually, over the millennia, as we became
either the subjects of or at least very aware of the various Nefilim
females of higher and lower social and functional rank, they also
were venerated on a more local basis.
Innana, who as a member of the
administrative council of twelve which oversaw the entire planet and
a pilot and far ranging traveler, was very widely known to humans.
The recognition of the Nefilim as real allows us to see that those "goddesses" were actually individuals of an advanced culture and why, though they were humanoid, humans saw them as superior or at least in a position of superior authority. Some were highly respected and loved by humans, others less so.
Some were of very high rank and authority, some were lower echelon technicians, specialists and officials. But they were Nefilim and thereby set apart from humans. Because of this amorphous melding into the goddess archetype, the less than ideally feminine characteristics of some of the Nefilim women tend to be glossed over. A single example is that of Innana's dealings with human men whom she had killed when they refused to become her lovers.
Her political ambitions caused her to
manipulate in such ruthless ways that current slang would term her a
"bitch on wheels". Yet she is also the one who probably gave us
tantra yoga and the ideal of the fully independent, self-realized woman. Understanding the veneration of our Nefilim female rulers as
both compulsory and conditioned by the relative attractiveness and
benevolence of their individual personalities throws light on two
other facets of human existence when the Nefilim were here on the
planet.
Others, following Eisler, would hold that this fortunate state should be attributed to a partnership of equality between male and female. Humans, in any given area, did what they were told by their local Nefilim ruler. If there indeed was a golden age of sexual equality it existed because both male and female humans were in an equally servile position: you don't get to dominate as females or as males when you are being dominated by a powerful authority.
The time when male dominant groups began
to overrun the scene, described as catastrophically disruptive of
peaceful human society by the goddess researchers, coincides with
the time when the Nefilim phased off the planet. When the cat’s
away...
On the contrary it affords a context in which an even more robust and dignified appreciation of our true history and womens' role in it becomes manifest. Breaking the ancient mythic goddesspell is necessary to arrive at the more profound realization that Goddesshood is not just a high metaphor; it is literally genetic.
Male dominance, even though it has a deep base in the various godspell religions focused on Yahweh who taught his male subjects to treat women as inferior, cannot survive genetic enlightenment. But we won't have to wait for those religions to disappear totally - the process is already well underway through attrition and suspicion - for it to diminish.
Even though the word "obey" has been eliminated from the marriage vows only recently and the Pope is not going to accept early retirement easily, it is going to happen faster than anticipated.
When
DNA speaks, everybody listens.
If an official announcement in any form by our or any government is made of the alien presence on the planet - I believe that to be the case with regard to the little greys at least - I think it will be unfortunate if, in the heady excitement and novelty of that event, all alien presence now or in the past is lumped together and glazed over, we will miss the critical opportunity to differentiate between the intra-solar system politics of our genetic half-alien creation and a species possibly from beyond the stars.
We must restore our own true history to
ourselves to gain the unassailable integrity necessary to know what
we are, what is good for us and not, what we can allow and not when
interacting with a species very different from ourselves.
The next stage will come when the scientific evidence from all the various investigative vectors begin to coalesce quickly and inexorably reach critical mass.
The Mars material, the mitochondrial DNA material, the work of West and Schoch on the age of the Sphinx, the next breaking information on the existence of planet X/Nibiru, the documentary material from the find in Sippar in Iraq if we can get it out of there, perhaps even the crop circle decipherment, the announcement by the government of this country of the alien presence, etc. and, singularly, the full recognition of the master thesis of Zecharia Sitchin.
At that point of critical mass the
evidence will simply overwhelm the academic and scientific arenas
and all scholars will be unable to ignore it.
Once free, it
becomes clear that fully conscious transcendental experience may be
understood as conscious dimensional expansion. I believe that we are
rapidly evolving off the Cartesian monkey-bars to habitual
four-dimensional consciousness.
But the real technology of immortality is already on the horizon through genetic engineering and probably through the re-discovery of the mono atomic form of gold by David Hudson, quite certainly the focus of the alchemical and some occult traditions, lost over time but remembered as the goal.
Immortality
will be the primary, dominant characteristic of the dawning new
phase of our racial maturation, a matter of simple human dignity.
And what if the Nefilim return?
They were the landlords but their deed has run out. We, perhaps, should convert the SETI search apparatus into a transceiving device focused on Nibiru and let it be known that we would like to take the kids on a first visit to the grandparents place.
But only if we can be accepted as an independent
and mature species. If they come back throwing their weight around
they are going to have a real problem with me. We should not fall
back into the old godspell subservient posture in the event that the Nefilim come back any more than a mature adult should remain
subservient to parental authority.
And play those god games in the context of relative immortality, with an unassailable integrity and racial identity which will enable us to step confidently into stellar society.
|
