by Robert J. Burrowes
January 28, 2023
About the Author
Robert has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to
understand why human beings are violent and has been a geopolitical
analyst since 1971.
Since becoming a nonviolent activist in 1981, he
has been involved in many nonviolent action campaigns and been
arrested for nonviolent acts of conscience about 30 times.
He is the
author of The Strategy of Nonviolent Defense: A Gandhian Approach
and 'Why Violence?'
His email address is firstname.lastname@example.org and his website is here.
He is a regular contributor to 'Global Research'.
My father was a Coastwatcher during World War II and while he
survived the war,
both of his brothers were killed.
His older brother, Bob, was
killed when the unmarked and unescorted Japanese POW ship,
Montevideo Maru, was torpedoed by the USS Sturgeon off the coast of
the Philippines on 1 July 1942.
Bob had been captured during the
fall of Rabaul five months earlier. Dad's twin brother, Tom, was
shot down over Rabaul on 14 December 1943.
It was his first mission.
As a child, my father took my brother and me to an annual service at
the Shrine of Remembrance to commemorate the death of his brothers.
Answering the question 'Why do human beings kill each
other?' so that I might know how to end it, became my life passion.
But my investigation was still young when my search led me
into a 'minefield' of issues and complexities.
already had the answer.
Where was it?
In the field of history,
religion, politics, economics, sociology or psychology?
And was there a common thread explaining the
violence of war and the violence of racism and the starvation the
newspapers told me was happening in Africa?
And would any 'common
thread' explain destruction of the environment too?
Where should I
Unfortunately but instructively, teachers at
school and then University all had different answers to my
fundamental question. And none of them felt compelling to me.
Clearly, I consciously conceded after a few years, the answer
to my question was not as simple as posing the question had been.
And, it seemed, I needed a much clearer sense of how the world
worked. A political sociology class I attended in 1971 referenced a
book written by C. Wright Mills:
The Power Elite.
If nothing else, reading this book made me
realize that the world did not work as I had been taught. So I now
sought to answer the question 'Why Violence?' with an awareness of
my need to understand, far more deeply, how the world really worked.
And so, with the benefit of more than 50 years of
investigation behind me, when prominent global and national figures
starting expressing concern about the threat supposedly posed by a
Coronavirus in early 2020, some brief research soon revealed
that there was no documented scientific proof that a unique 'virus'
had been isolated and it was just the latest medical hoax to be
perpetrated on humanity.
From there, it was an easy step to identify
and comprehend the basic components of this latest (technocratic)
stage in the Elite program to impose control over all humanity.
Still, after nearly three years, it felt like it was time to spell
out, more fully, how what is happening now had a 5,000 year 'lead
So this is my attempt to do so.
I thank Anita McKone, my lovely wife, fellow nonviolent activist
and cofounder of 'We Are
Human, We Are Free', for her thoughtful suggestions to improve
the original draft of this investigation.
I extend my gratitude to Professor
Michel Chossudovsky, whose
investigative capacities, insight and courage has ensured the
incredible value of
his own contributions in exposing the Elite program but also in
making 'Global Research'
the premier news/analysis site for those resisting the 'Great Reset'
Fourth Industrial Revolution,
And I thank my parents,
Beryl and James Burrowes, both veterans of World War II and 99
years of age, for their unfailing love and support no matter where
my investigation and nonviolent actions take me.
According to a video published by the World Economic Forum in
2016, by 2030 'You'll Own Nothing. And You'll Be Happy.'
'8 predictions for the world in 2030'.
Clearly, if this prediction is to come true, then many things
must happen. Let me identify why the World Economic Forum believes
it will happen and then investigate these claims.
questions, I will examine whether those who will own nothing will
include the Rothschild, Rockefeller and other staggeringly wealthy
families. Or, perhaps, whether they just mean people like you and
In fact, a primary intention behind the Elite's ongoing
technocratic coup, initiated in January 2020, is to kill off a
substantial proportion of the human population, fundamentally
reshape world order including by turning those humans left alive
into transhuman slaves, drive the global economy to collapse and
implement the final redistribution of global wealth from everyone
else to this Elite.
Let me start with the briefest of histories so
that what is happening can be understood as the ultimate conclusion
of a long-standing agenda, identify who I mean by the 'Global Elite'
(and its agents), then present the evidence to explain how this is
happening and, most importantly, a comprehensive strategy to defeat
Needless to say, in the interests of keeping this study
manageable, many critical historical events - including how
imperialism and colonialism, the international slave trade, a great
number of wars and coups, Wall Street support for the Bolshevik
Revolution in Russia in 1917 and precipitation of the Great
Depression in 1929, were used to advance the Elite program - are not
addressed in this investigation.
But for accounts of the latter two
events which provide evidence consistent with the analysis offered
Wall Street and The Bolshevik Revolution and
The Secrets of the Federal Reserve.
A Brief Economic History
Following the Neolithic revolution 12,000 years ago, agriculture
allowed human settlement to supersede the hunter-gatherer economy.
However, while the Neolithic revolution occurred spontaneously in
several parts of the world, some of the Neolithic societies that
emerged in Asia, Europe, Central America and South America resorted
to increasing degrees of social control, ostensibly to achieve a
variety of social and economic outcomes, including increased
efficiency in food production.
Civilizations emerged just over 5,000 years ago and, utilizing
this higher degree of social control, were characterized by towns or
cities, efficient food production allowing a large minority of the
community to be engaged in more specialized activities, a
centralized bureaucracy and the practice of skilled warfare.
'A Critique of Human Society since the Neolithic Revolution'.
With the emergence of civilization,
elites of a local nature
(such as the Pharaohs of Egypt)
elites with imperial reach
(including Roman emperors)
elites of a religious nature (such as
Popes and officials of
elites of an economic character
City of London Corporation)
elites of a 'national' type
(especially the monarchies of Europe),
essentially to manage the administration associated with maintaining
and expanding their realms (political, economic and/or religious).
The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 formally established the
nation-state system in Europe.
Enriched by the long-standing and
profitable legacy of their control over local domestic populations,
support for the imperial conquest of non-European lands, colonial
subjugation of indigenous peoples and the international slave trade,
European elites, backed by military violence, were able to impose a
long series of changes over national,
political, economic and legal
systems which facilitated the emergence of industrial capitalism in
Europe in the 18th century.
These interrelated political, economic and legal changes
facilitated scientific research that was increasingly geared towards
utilizing new resources and technological innovation that drove the
ongoing invention of machinery and the harnessing of coal-fired
power to make industrial production possible.
Beyond this, and following several centuries of more and less
formal versions of it, Elite political and economic imperatives
drove the 'legal' enclosure of the Commons to force people off their
land and into the poorly-paid labour force needed in the emerging
industrial cities. In these cities, an ongoing series of
developments in the organization of work in factories,
electrification, banking, and other changes and technologies
dramatically expanded the gap between rich and poor.
subsequently imposed changes to education and, later, healthcare,
national economies and the global economy were increasingly
structured to profoundly disconnect 'ordinary' people from their
land, traditional knowledge and long-standing healthcare practices
to make them dependent while dramatically reinforcing an
institutional reality progressively consolidated since the dawn of
ensured that the economy perpetually redistributed wealth from
those who have less to those who have more.
As noted by Adam Smith, for example, in his classic work
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations published
'All for ourselves, and nothing for other people, seems, in
every age of the world, to have been the vile maxim of the masters
And this was exemplified, for example, by the 150-year struggle
between the bankers working to establish a privately-owned central
bank in the newly independent United States and those Presidents
(such as Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln) and members of Congress
who worked tirelessly to defeat it. In fact:
'Most of the founding
fathers realized the potential dangers of banking and feared
bankers' accumulation of wealth and power.'
Dividend Day at the Bank
of England, 1770
(Licensed under the Public Domain)
Having observed how the privately-owned British central bank, the
Bank of England, had run up the British national debt to such an
extent that Parliament had been forced to place unfair taxes on the
American colonies, the founders in the US understood the evils of a
privately-owned central bank, which Benjamin Franklin later claimed
was the real cause of the American Revolution.
As James Madison, principal author of the US Constitution argued:
'History records that the Money Changers used every form of abuse,
intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their
control over governments by controlling money, and its issuance.'
Another founder, Thomas Jefferson, put it this way:
believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our
liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken
from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly
As it turns out, the battle over who would get the power
to issue US money raged from 1764, changing hands eight times, until
the bankers' final deceitful victory in 1913 with the establishment
of the Federal Reserve System.
'The battle over who gets to issue
our money has been the pivotal issue throughout the history of the
Wars are fought over it. Depressions are caused to
acquire it. Yet after WWI, this battle was rarely mentioned in the
newspapers or history books.
By WWI, the Money Changers with
their dominant wealth had seized control of most of the nation's
The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of
America (with the relevant section of the four-part
transcript of the video available here:
'The Money Masters: Part I'.)
Why the objection to a private central bank? Well, consider the
formation and ownership of the inaccurately named Bank of England,
established in 1694.
By the end of the C17th, England was in financial
ruin: 50 years of more or less continuous wars with France and
Holland had depleted it. So government officials asked the bankers
for the loans necessary to pursue their political purposes.
these bankers want in return?
'The price was high: a
government-sanctioned, privately owned bank which could issue money
created out of nothing.'
It became the world's first privately-owned
central bank and, although it was deceptively called the Bank of
England to make people think it was part of the government, it was
Moreover, like any other private corporation, the Bank of
England sold shares to get started.
'The investors, whose names were
never revealed, were supposed to put up 1,250,000 British pounds in
gold coins, to buy their shares in the bank. But only 750,000 pounds
was ever received.'
Despite that, the bank was duly chartered in
1694 and started the business of loaning out several times the money
it supposedly had in reserves, all at interest.
Let me restate that for clarity:
The British government
legislated to create a privately-owned central bank (that is, a bank
owned by a small group of wealthy individuals) that loaned out vast
amounts of money it did not have so that it could make a profit by
This practice is called
'fractional reserve banking' to make it
sound like some sophisticated economic concept rather than a
deceitful practice that, should you or I do it, we would be jailed.
'In exchange the Bank would loan the British politicians as much of
the new currency as they wanted, as long as they secured the debt by
direct taxation of the British people.'
In other words, the Bank
could not lose.
So, as William T. Still notes:
of the Bank of England amounted to nothing less than the legal
counterfeiting of a national currency for private gain.'
'Unfortunately', he goes on,
'nearly every nation now has a
privately controlled central bank, using the Bank of England as
their basic model. Such is the power of these central banks, that
they soon take total control over a nation's economy.
amounts to nothing else than a plutocracy, rule by the rich.'
The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of
America (with the relevant section of the four-part
transcript of the video available here:
'The Money Masters: Part I'.)
Before proceeding, if how the banking system works isn't your
strong point, this brief video does a good job of spelling out
essential points in a non-technical way. Watch
'Banking - the Greatest Scam on Earth'.
And for a thoughtful explanation of the meaning and history of
money, see Nick Szabo's superb article
The Origins of Money'.
In any case, the fundamental point is simple:
After 5,000 years,
the various processes by which local elites, then 'national' elites,
then international elites, and now the Global Elite have
continuously asserted their control to enhance their capacity to
shape how the world works and to accumulate wealth has now reached
Thus we are on the brink of being herded into an
Elite-controlled technocracy in which, as the World Economic Forum
By 2030 'You'll Own Nothing. And You'll
So you will own nothing.
And why would you be happy about that?
Because you will be a
an organism that no longer even owns their own
Who Is the Global Elite and How Does It Operate?
Many authors have, directly or indirectly, addressed this
question and each has come up with their own nuanced combination of
wealthy individuals and families, their political connections, as
well as the financial instruments and organizational structures
through which their power is gained and exercised.
For the purposes of this study, I am going to define the Global
Elite as those families that had acquired their vast wealth and
firmly established their preeminent political and economic power in
global society by the end of the 19th century.
families have thus played the central role in shaping institutions
and events both before but also since that time, thus providing the
framework in which other wealthy people have since emerged.
In order to perform their fundamental role in shaping the modern
world to serve their purposes, this Elite has facilitated the
creation of a vast network of agents - corporations, institutions,
other families and individuals - who are owned and/or controlled by
this Elite and act as 'fronts' to advance Elite interests.
given period, the Elite families remain largely unchanged (while
succeeding generations of individuals further the families'
interests) but the organizational and individual agents through
which these families work vary, depending on Elite aims in the
contexts it precipitates.
A landmark Rothschild
Palace in Frankfurt, Germany,
Villa Günthersburg (photographed 1855)
(Licensed under the Public Domain)
Let me briefly illustrate my approach by using one family
'House of Rothschild' - as a case study before moving onto a wider
description of how Elite families use their wealth to shape
corporations, institutions, events and people to serve their own
This example is drawn from the official Rothschild Archive and
two (sometimes conflicting) Rothschild-authorized accounts of the
family's history written at different times.
The House of Rothschild - Money's Prophets, 1798-1848
The Rothschilds: A Family Portrait.
In addition, the account draws on sources that report neutrally
on Rothschild involvement as well as some sources that are critical.
These sources are cited in context below.
By the mid-18th century, the ancestors of Mayer
Amschel had long been small merchants in the town ghetto of
Frankfurt. But, as a Jew without a family name and before street
numbering was used, Mayer was also known by the name some ancestors
had used on the house sign where they once lived: Rothschild (Red
With more ability than other merchants and having been sent
to learn the rudiments of business in the firm of Wolf Jakob
Oppenheim, he became a dealer in rare coins, medals and antiques,
the buyers of which were almost invariably aristocratic collectors,
including William, Hereditary Prince of Hesse-Kassel.
It was this
business that enabled Mayer Amschel to accumulate the capital to
move into banking, a natural outgrowth of his policy of extending
credit to some of his clients.
His wealth started to increase
rapidly as he focused more on state and merchant banking, both local
With a policy of seeking little profit from interest on loans
while seeking trade concessions in other areas, seeking clientele
only among 'the noblest personages in Germany', secret bookkeeping
in parallel with the official one and, later, deploying his five
sons to replicate his style and activities in England (Nathan, who,
after a few years in Manchester, established himself in the City of
London), Paris (Jakob, known as James), Naples (Kalman, or Carl),
Vienna (Salomon) as well as Frankfurt (where eldest son Amschel
eventually succeeded father Mayer), the Rothschild dynasty and
'multinational business model' quickly established itself throughout
Critically, it was serviced by the maintenance of close
relationships with leading political figures and salaried agents
working in financial markets who provided essential political and
commercial news, as well as private communications channels
(including coaches with secret compartments) that worked with
And it was this 'Red Shield' communication network, later
operating under Royal patronage, combined with a certain audacity,
that enabled the Rothschilds to profit handsomely from a variety of
adverse circumstances including the restrictions on trade between
England and the continent which characterized the Napoleonic period,
and the Napoleonic Wars as well.
This included smuggling vast
amounts of contraband goods from England to the continent and
transferring a substantial hoard of gold bullion through France to
finance the feeding of Wellington's army.
Most spectacularly, and despite family efforts to suppress
awareness of this fact, the Rothschilds profited enormously from
their privileged notice that Wellington defeated Napoleon at
Waterloo in 1815, as recorded by William T. Still and Patrick S.J.
Carmack in their 3.5 hour documentary
The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of
America (with the relevant section of the four-part
transcript of the video available here:
'The Money Masters: Part II'.)
How did this happen?
Following a long series of wars across Europe and the eastern
Mediterranean, during which he was very successful, rapidly promoted
and, in 1804, elected Emperor of France, Napoleon was eventually
defeated. He abdicated and was exiled to Elba, an island off the
Tuscan coast, in 1814 but escaped nine months later in February
As he returned to Paris, French troops were sent out to capture
Napoleon but such was his charisma that,
'the soldiers rallied around
their old leader and hailed him as their emperor once again.'
having borrowed funds to rearm, in March 1815 Napoleon's freshly
equipped army marched out to be ultimately defeated by Britain's
Duke of Wellington at Waterloo less than three months later.
'Some writers claimed Napoleon borrowed 5 million
pounds from the Bank of England to rearm.
But it appears these funds
actually came from Ubard Banking House in Paris. Nevertheless, from
about this point on, it was not unusual for privately controlled
central banks to finance both sides in a war.'
'Why would a central bank finance opposing sides in a war?' Still
'Because war is
the biggest debt generator of them all. A nation will borrow any
amount for victory. The ultimate loser is loaned just enough to
hold out the vain hope of victory, and the ultimate winner is
given enough to win.
loans are usually conditioned upon the guarantee that the victor
will honor the debts of the vanquished.'
Image: Nathan Mayer Rothschild
(Licensed under the Public Domain)
While the outcome of the battle at Waterloo was certainly in
doubt, back in London Nathan Rothschild planned to use the outcome,
no matter who won or lost, to try to seize control over the British
stock and bond market and possibly even the Bank of England.
he do this?
Here is one account.
'Rothschild stationed a trusted
agent, a man named Rothworth, on the north side of the battlefield,
closer to the English Channel.'
Once the battle had been decided, at
the cost of many thousands of French, English and other European
lives, Rothworth headed immediately for the Channel.
the news to Nathan Rothschild, a full 24 hours before Wellington's
own courier arrived with the news.
Rothschild hurried to the stock market and, with all eyes on him
given the Rothschild's legendary communications network was well
known, others present observed Rothschild knowing that if Wellington
had been defeated, and Napoleon was again at large in Europe, the
British financial situation would become grave indeed. Rothschild
began selling his consoles (British government bonds).
investors saw that Rothschild was selling. It could only mean
one thing: Napoleon must have won, Wellington must have lost.'
The market plummeted. Soon everyone was selling their own
consoles and prices dropped sharply.
Rothschild started secretly buying up the consoles through his
agents for only a fraction of their worth hours before.'
As Still concludes this recounting of the episode:
'One hundred years later, the New York Times ran the story that
Nathan Rothschild's grandson had attempted to secure a court order
to suppress a book with that stock market story in it.
Rothschild family claimed that the story was untrue and libelous.
But the court denied the Rothschilds' request and ordered the family
to pay all court costs.'
In any case, having built their initial fortune using various
means - some of which, as just illustrated, were neither moral nor
legal - throughout the 19th century the Rothschild family
continued to accumulate wealth through the international bond
market, which they played a key role in developing, as well as other
forms of financial business: bullion broking and refining, accepting
and discounting commercial bills, direct trading in commodities,
foreign exchange dealing and arbitrage, even insurance.
The Rothschilds also had a select group of clients
- usually royal and
aristocratic individuals whom they wished to cultivate - to whom
they offered a range of 'personal banking services' ranging from
large personal loans (such as that to the Austrian Chancellor Prince
Metternich) to a first class private postal service (for Queen
The family also had substantial mining interests and was
a major industrial investor backing the construction of railway
lines in Europe in the 1830s and 1840s.
But, apart from its other
interests, the family continued to be heavily involved in 'the money
'From 1870 onwards, London was the centre of Britain's greatest
export: money. Vast quantities of savings and earnings were gathered
and invested at considerable profit through the international
merchant banks of Rothschild, Baring, Lazard, and Morgan in the
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War,
But what, exactly, is the City?
Coat of arms of the City of
The Latin motto reads Domine Dirige Nos,
(Licensed under the Public Domain)
City of London Corporation, an independent square mile in the
heart of London, was founded in about AD50 and quickly established
itself as an important commercial centre which ultimately gave birth
to some of the world's greatest financial institutions such as the
London Stock Exchange, Lloyd's of London and, in 1694, the
Bank of England.
City's 'modern period' is sometimes dated from 1067.
However, as explained by Nicholas Shaxson, the City,
ancient, [semi-foreign] entity lodged inside the British nation
state; a "prehistoric monster which had mysteriously survived into
the modern world", as a 19th century would-be City
reformer put it... the corporation is an offshore island inside
Britain, a tax haven in its own right.'
Of course, the term
haven' is a misnomer,
'because such places aren't just about tax.
What they sell is escape: from the laws, rules and taxes of
jurisdictions elsewhere, usually with secrecy as their prime
The notion of elsewhere (hence the term
The Cayman Islands'
tax and secrecy laws are not designed for the benefit of the
50,000-odd Caymanians, but help wealthy people and corporations,
mostly in the US and Europe, get around the rules of their own
The outcome is
one set of rules for a rich elite and another for the rest of
In the words of Shaxson:
The City's 'elsewhere' status in
Britain stems from a simple formula: over centuries, sovereigns and
governments have sought City loans, and in exchange the City has
extracted privileges and freedoms from rules and laws to which the
rest of Britain must submit.
The City does have a noble tradition of
standing up for citizens' freedoms against despotic sovereigns, but
this has morphed into freedom for money.
'The tax haven in the heart of Britain'.
As Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor explain it then, by 1870:
City influence and investments
crossed national boundaries and raised funds for governments and
companies across the entire world.
The great investment houses made
billions, their political allies and agents grew wealthy...
VII, both as king and earlier as Prince of Wales, swapped friendship
and honours for the generous patronage of the Rothschilds, Cassel,
and other Jewish banking families like the Montagus, Hirschs and
The Bank of England was completely in the hands of these
powerful financiers, and the relationship went unchallenged….
The flow of money into the United
States during the nineteenth century advanced industrial development
to the immense benefit of the millionaires it created: Rockefeller,
Carnegie, Morgan, Vanderbilt and their associates.
represented British interests, either directly through front
companies or indirectly through agencies that they controlled.
Railroads, steel, shipbuilding, construction, oil and finance
These small groups of massively rich individuals on both
sides of the Atlantic knew one another well, and the Secret Elite in
London initiated the very select and secretive dining club,
Pilgrims, that brought them together on a regular basis.
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, p.
To choose one example from those just listed, you can read an
official account of the Rothschild family's early involvement in oil
production, including its 'decisive influence' in the formation of
Royal Dutch Shell, in the Rothschild Archive.
'Searching for Oil in Roubaix'.
Beyond their investments in the industries just listed, however,
the Rothschilds had significant media interests: Their Paribas Bank,
'controlled the all-powerful news agency Havas, which in turn owned
the most important advertising agency in France.'
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War,
And, by the late 19th century, direct Rothschild
investment in major 'armaments companies' (now better known as
weapons corporations) and related industries was substantial with
official biographer Niall Ferguson candidly noting,
late-nineteenth-century imperialism had its "military-industrial
complex" the Rothschilds were unquestionably part of it.'
The House of Rothschild - Volume 2 - The World's Banker,
1849-1998, p. 579.
Of course, as noted previously, the Rothschild family is not the
only family that uses its wealth to exercise enormous economic and
political power and to profit from war, but the evidence suggests
that it has long been the most deeply entrenched in the
institutions, including those it has created, that facilitate the
exercise of this power.
Moreover, it is linked to many other wealthy
families through a multitude of arrangements as will be shown.
Consider the following examples of how the power of wealth is
exercised and note the names of some other wealthy families.
'in the background', elite figures spend
considerable time manipulating 'well-positioned' people, and none
are more adept at this than the Rothschilds. To cite just one of
'both the great estates of Balmoral and Sandringham,
so intimately associated with the British royal family, were
facilitated, if not entirely paid for, through the largess of the
House of Rothschild',
...thus maintaining the long-standing Rothschild
tradition of gifting 'loans' - that is, bribes, as the brothers had
long before privately acknowledged - to royalty (and other key
Of course, this manipulation of people is done to ensure the
creation of particular institutions or to precipitate or facilitate
a particular sequence of events.
Just one obvious example of this
occurred when the British government was manipulated into the Boer
War of 1899-1902 by 'the secret society of Cecil Rhodes' as it was
originally known and of which Lord (Nathan) Rothschild was a
founding member along with Alfred, later Lord, Milner who succeeded
Rhodes as head of this exclusive secret club.
While the British
public was given a more palatable pretext for this war via the
media, it was fundamentally fought to defend and consolidate the
rich South African gold-mining interests of wealthy businesspeople,
including the Rothschilds.
By the time the war ended, the
Transvaal's gold was finally in their hands.
deaths in the concentration camps, [of whom more than 26,000 were
women and children]; 22,000 British Empire troops were killed and
23,000 wounded. Boer casualties numbered 34,000.
amounted to 14,000.'
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War,
pp. 23 & 38-50 and
The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden.
The US Federal Reserve System
In his classic work
The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal
Reserve, in which he describes the formation, structure and
function of the US Federal
Reserve System, which governs banking in the United States, G.
Edward Griffin identified the seven men
and who they
represented, at the secret meeting held at the private
resort of J.P. Morgan on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia in
November 1910 when the System was conceived (and later passed as The
Federal Reserve Act in 1913).
The seven men at this meeting represented the
great financial institutions of Wall Street and, indirectly, Europe
as well: that is, they represented one-quarter of the total
wealth of the entire world.
Nelson W. Aldrich,
Republican 'whip' in the US Senate, Chair of the National Monetary
Commission and father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller Jr.; Henry P.
Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company; Charles D. Norton,
President of the 1st National Bank of New York; A. Piatt Andrew,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; Frank A. Vanderlip, President
of the National City Bank of New York, representing William
Rockefeller; Benjamin Strong, head of J.P. Morgan's Bankers Trust
Company and later to become head of the System; and Paul M. Warburg,
a partner in Kuhn, Loeb & Company, representing the Rothschilds and
Warburgs in Europe.
But lest you think that there is some
long-standing ties generated from huge financial injections at
crucial times meant that several other key banks owed much to
For example, in 1857 a run on U.S. banks saw the
bank Peabody, Morgan and Company in deep trouble as four other banks
were driven out of business. But Peabody, Morgan and Company was
saved by the Bank of England.
Why? Who initiated the rescue?
According to Docherty and Macgregor,
'The Rothschilds held immense
sway in the Bank of England and the most likely answer is that they
intervened to save the firm. Peabody retired in 1864, and Junius
Morgan inherited a strong bank with powerful links to Rothschild.'
Junius was the father of J.P. Morgan. See
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War,
A similar thing happened when Nathaniel Rothschild headed the
Bank of England committee that rescued Barings Bank from imminent
collapse in 1890.
But other big banks,
'were beholden to or fronts
for the Rothschilds... Like J.P. Morgan, Barings and Kuhn Loeb, the
M.M. Warburg Bank owed its survival and ultimate success to
To reiterate then:
'by the early twentieth
century numerous major banks, including J.P. Morgan and Barings, and
armaments firms, were beholden to or fronts for the Rothschilds.'
And this had many advantages. J.P. Morgan, who was deeply involved
with the Pilgrims - an exclusive club that linked major U.K. and
U.S. businesspeople - was clearly perceived as an upright Protestant
guardian of capitalism, who could trace his family roots to
pre-Revolutionary times, so by acting in the interests of the London Rothschilds he shielded their American profits from the poison of
But the connections do not end there.
periods of blistering competition between the investment and banking
houses, the steel companies, the railroad builders and the two
international goliaths of oil, Rockefeller and Rothschilds, but by
the turn of the century the surviving conglomerates adopted a more
subtle relationship, which avoided real competition.'
earlier, Baron de Rothschild had accepted an invitation from John D.
Rockefeller to meet in New York behind the closed doors of Standard
Oil's headquarters on Broadway where they had quickly reached a
'Clearly both understood the advantage of
The apparent rivalry between major
stakeholders in banking, industry and commerce has long been a
convenient facade, which they are content to leave much of the world
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War,
The Marriner S. Eccles
Federal Reserve Board Building
(commonly known as the Eccles
Building or Federal Reserve Building)
located at 20th Street &
Constitution Avenue NW
in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of
Designed by architect Paul Philippe Cret in 1935,
construction of the Art Deco building was completed in 1937.
(Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)
Beyond business and financial links of this nature, of course,
there is marriage. For example, according to Dean Henderson:
'The Warburgs, Kuhn Loebs, Goldman Sachs, Schiffs and Rothschilds have
intermarried into one big happy banking family.
The Warburg family... tied up with the Rothschilds in 1814 in Hamburg, while Kuhn Loeb
powerhouse Jacob Schiff shared quarters with Rothschilds in 1785.
Schiff immigrated to America in 1865. He joined forces with Abraham
Kuhn and married Solomon Loeb's daughter.
Loeb and Kuhn married each
others sisters and the Kuhn Loeb dynasty was consummated. Felix
Warburg married Jacob Schiff's daughter.
Two Goldman daughters
married two sons of the Sachs family, creating Goldman Sachs.
1806 Nathan Rothschild married the oldest daughter of Levi Barent
Cohen, a leading financier in London.'
Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen,
Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror
Network, p. 488.
So to return to the foundation of the US Federal Reserve System,
according to Griffin:
The reason for secrecy was simple.
Had it been known that rival factions of the banking community had
joined together, the public would have been alerted to the
possibility that the bankers were plotting an agreement in restraint
of trade - which, of course, is exactly what they were doing.
emerged was a cartel agreement with five objectives: stop the
growing competition from the nation's newer banks; obtain a
franchise to create money out of nothing for the purpose of lending;
get control of the reserves of all banks so that the more reckless
ones would not be exposed to currency drains and bank runs; get the
taxpayer to pick up the cartel's inevitable losses; and convince
Congress that the purpose was to protect the public.
It was realized
that the bankers would have to become partners with the politicians
and that the structure of the cartel would have to be a central
The record shows that the Fed has failed to achieve its stated
objectives. That is because those were never its true goals.
banking cartel, and in terms of the five objectives stated above, it
has been an unqualified success.
To reiterate Griffin's key point:
'a primary objective of that
cartel was to involve the federal government as an agent for
shifting the inevitable losses from the owners of those banks to the
And this is confirmed by the,
'massive evidence of
history since the System was created'.
Or, in the words of economics Professor
Antony C. Sutton, who
carefully detailed the longstanding links between Wall Street and
the family of US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, including
Roosevelt himself (a banker and speculator from 1921 to 1928):
Federal Reserve System is a legal private monopoly of the money
supply operated for the benefit of a few under the guise of
protecting and promoting the public interest.'
Wall Street and F.D.R.
And, as U.S. Congressman Louis Thomas McFadden, chairman of the
House Committee on Banking and Currency, observed in 1932:
Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of the United States did
not perceive that... this country was to supply financial power to an
international superstate - a superstate controlled by international
bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave
the world for their own pleasure.'
'Speech by Rep. Louis T. McFadden denouncing the Federal Reserve
Equally importantly, creation of the Federal Reserve was just one
of many preliminary steps taken over a 25-year period by a select
group of men in key positions who conspired to ignite The Great War
to both shape the future world order and profit enormously from the
death and destruction.
You can read detailed accounts of what took
place, including key players, their motives and instigation of the
Boer War in South Africa, touched on above, as part of the process,
in books such as these:
is also a thoughtful summary in
'A crime against humanity: the Great Reset of 1914-1918' and an
excellent video on the subject:
The primary cost of World War I was 20 million human lives, but
it was immensely profitable for some.
The Bank for International Settlements
Another critical development in this period was the creation of
the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS) - as 'the central bank of central banks' - in
As described by Professor
Carroll Quigley, the BIS was the
apex of efforts by elite bankers,
'to create a world system of
financial control in private hands able to dominate the political
system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.'
But the push started many years before with Montagu Norman (Bank
of England) and Benjamin Strong (the first governor of the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York) both committed advocates.
'In the 1920's,
they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of
the United States to force all the major countries of the world to
go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free
from all political control, with all questions of
international finance to be settled by agreements by such central
banks without interference from governments.'
All the members of the
(Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0)
This system was to
be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the
world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent
private meetings and conferences.
The apex of the system was to be
the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a
private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which
were themselves private corporations.
Each central bank, in the
hands of men like,
Montagu Norman of the Bank of England
Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank
of the Bank of France
Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank,
dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to
manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic
activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by
subsequent economic rewards in the business world.
The B.I.S. as a
private institution was owned by the seven chief central banks and
was operated by the heads of these, who together formed its
But, Quigley points out:
It must not be
felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks were
themselves substantive powers in world finance.
They were not.
Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant
investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them
up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.
substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of
these investment bankers (also called 'international' or
'merchant' bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in
their own unincorporated private banks.
These formed a system of
international cooperation and national dominance which was more
private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their
agents in the central banks.
This dominance of investment
bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and
investment funds in their own countries and throughout the
They could dominate the financial and industrial systems
of their own countries by their influence over the flow of
current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the
re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate
governments by their control over current government loans and
the play of the international exchanges.
Almost all of this
power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of
men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off
successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool
in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their
In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent
during much of the nineteenth century.
Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, pp.
242-3 & 245.
Ensuring that this
select group of international bankers could operate without any form
of accountability to any other authority in the world, the BIS
'Headquarters Agreement with Switzerland' Articles 4 and 12
specifically identify a range of 'privileges and immunities' that,
among others, provide that,
'The Bank shall enjoy immunity from
jurisdiction' and 'members of the Board of Directors of the Bank,
together with the representatives of those central banks which are
members of the Bank' with 'immunity from arrest or imprisonment'.
between the Swiss Federal Council and the Bank for International
Settlements to determine the Bank's legal status in Switzerland'.
In plain language,
the BIS and its members are beyond the reach of governments, key
international organizations and the rule of law. They are
accountable to no-one. And this is why the BIS was never held to
account for its commission of war crimes.
'History - the BIS during the
Second World War (1939-48)'. For an excellent and detailed
account of the Bank for International Settlements, see Adam LeBor's
of Basel: The Shadowy History of the Secret Bank that Runs the World.
Beyond this, as
Sutton notes, because politicians sympathetic to financial
capitalism and academics with ideas about world control are kept in
line with a system of rewards and penalties,
'in the early 1930s the
guiding vehicle for this international system of financial and
political control' was the BIS, headquartered in Basle.
'continued its work during World War II as the medium through which
the bankers - who... were not at war with each other - continued a
mutually beneficial exchange of ideas, information, and planning for
the post-war world.'
In this sense only, the war was irrelevant to
Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler, pp. 11-12.
So while elite
figures, including the Rothschilds, continued to shape institutions
and events to restructure world order and make it more profitable
for themselves, virtually everyone else in the world was an
unwitting victim of their secret programs, many at the cost of their
A notable exception was US Major General
who at least spelled out the critical role that war played in wealth
creation for the elite.
Following more than three decades of
highly-decorated service in the US Marine Corp, Butler later
described his experience in the following terms:
'I spent most of my
time being a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street
and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism.'
'Major General Smedley Butler'.
In his book
published in 1935, he wrote:
'War is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the
most vicious... It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned
in dollars and the losses in lives... It is conducted for the
benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many.
Out of war
a few people make huge fortunes.'
He went on to describe some of the
individuals and corporations that made huge profits out of World War
War Is A Racket.
World War II and What Followed
And, just a few
years later, World War II demonstrated that 'war is a racket' yet
By carefully penetrating the cloak of deception behind which
it was hidden, Professor Antony C. Sutton considered original
documentation and eyewitness accounts to reveal what remains one of
the most remarkable and under-reported facts of World War II.
account of this orchestrated conflagration, Sutton carefully
documents how prominent Wall Street banks and US businesses
supported Hitler's rise to power by financing and trading with Nazi
Germany, reaching the unsavory conclusion that,
'the catastrophe of
World War II was extremely profitable for a select group of
financial insiders' including J.P. Morgan, T.W. Lamont, the
Rockefeller interests, General Electric, Standard Oil, and the
National City, Chase, and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company,
General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and scores of others in 'the
bloodiest, most destructive war in history'.
Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler.
To illustrate the
complex and wide-ranging collaboration between US business interests
and the Nazis throughout the war, consider just one example:
eve of World War II the German chemical complex of
which included the banker Max Warburg (brother of Paul of the US
Federal Reserve) on its Board of Directors, was the largest chemical
manufacturing enterprise in the world, with extraordinary political
and economic power within Hitler's Nazi state.
The Farben cartel
dated from 1925 and had been created with financial assistance from
Wall Street by the organizing genius of Hermann Schmitz, a prominent
early Nazi who, through I.G. Farben, helped fund Hitler's seizure of
control in March 1933. Schmitz created the super-giant chemical
enterprise out of six already giant German chemical companies.
So critical was I.G.
Farben to the Nazi war effort that it produced 100% of its
lubricating oil and various other products, 95% of its poison gas -
'enough gas to kill 200 million humans' - used in the extermination
chambers, 84% of its explosives, 70% of its gunpowder, and very high
proportions of many other critical products including aviation fuel.
As Sutton concludes:
'Without the capital supplied by Wall Street,
there would have been no I.G. Farben in the first place and almost
certainly no Adolf Hitler and World War II.'
Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler, pp.17-20.
The cost in human
lives of World War II was 70-85 million.
But there was no cost to
those Wall Street corporations and their fellow war profiteers that
collaborated with Nazi Germany. Just massive profits...
Following World War II
had become the long-standing collusion between political, corporate
and military elites, sociology Professor C. Wright Mills published
his classic work
The Power Elite in 1956.
This scholarly effort was
among the earliest of the post-World War II era to document the
nature of the US elite and how it functioned, highlighting the
interlocking power of corporate, political and military elites as
they exercised control over US national society and went about the
task of exploiting the general population.
But a weakness of
the account by Mills was his failure to grapple with the already
long-standing power of a global elite to manipulate key events in
any one country, and certainly the United States, even if much of
this was done through the relevant national elite(s).
This 'global reach'
of the Elite is again clearly apparent in any study of ownership of
the world's oil resources. In his 1975 book The Seven Sisters,
Anthony Sampson popularized this collective name for the shadowy oil
cartel that, throughout its history, had vigorously worked to
eliminate competitors and control the world's oil.
The Seven Sisters: The Great Oil Companies and the World They
Several decades later,
Dean Henderson simply
'After a tidal wave of mergers at the turn of the
millennium, Sampson's Seven Sisters were Four Horsemen: Exxon Mobil,
Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco and Royal Dutch/Shell.'
however, Henderson noted the following:
The oil wealth
generated in the Persian Gulf region is the main source of
capital [for the international mega-banks].
They sell the Gulf
Cooperation Council sheiks 30-year treasury bonds at 5%
interest, then loan the sheiks' oil money out to Third World
governments and Western consumers alike at 15-20% interest. In
the process these financial overlords - who produce nothing of
economic import - use debt as their lever in consolidating
control over the global economy.
Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen,
Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and
Terror Network, pp. 168, 451.
And, following a
series of mergers and then the 2008 banking crisis, four giant banks
emerged to dominate the US economy: JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank
of America and Wells Fargo.
Moreover, these banks, along with
Deutsche Bank, Banque Paribas, Barclays 'and other European old
money behemoths', own the four oil giants and are also 'among the
top 10 stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation'
giving them vast control over the global economy.
Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen,
Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror
Network, pp. 470, 473.
So who owns these
banks? By now it should come as no surprise that several scholars at
different times during the past 100 years have investigated this
issue and come to essentially the same conclusion: the major
families, increasingly interrelated by blood, marriage and/or
business interests, have simply consolidated their control over the
Apart from scholars already mentioned above, in the 1983
revision of his book, Eustace Mullins noted that a few families
still controlled the New York City banks which, in turn, hold the
controlling stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
identified the families of the Rothschilds, Morgans, Rockefellers,
Warburgs and others. See
The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, p. 224.
have written on the subject of elite power since Mills with
Professor Peter Phillips penning the 2018 book
Giants: The Global Power Elite which reviews,
transition from the nation state power elites described by Mills to
a transnational power elite centralized on the control of global
capital around the world.
The Global Power Elite function as a
nongovernmental network of similarly educated wealthy people with
common interests of managing, facilitating, and protecting
concentrated global wealth and insuring the continued growth of
Aside from the
obvious criticism that Phillips effectively repeats the mistake made
by Mills in assuming that there was no pre-existing 'transnational
power elite' even if in different form, Phillips goes on to usefully
identify the world's top seventeen asset management firms, such as
BlackRock and J.P Morgan Chase, that collectively manage (by now)
more than $US50 trillion in a self-invested network of interlocking
capital that spans the globe.
logo is seen on a window at the congress center
for the upcoming Annual Meeting 2011
of the World Economic
Forum in Davos, Switzerland, January 23, 2011.
(Copyright by World
Economic Forum, swiss-image.ch
Photo by Jolanda
Phillips identifies the 199 individual directors of the seventeen
global financial Giants and the importance of those transnational
institutions that serve a unifying function, including,
particularly two very important global elite policy-planning
Group of Thirty
(which has 32 members) and the extended executive committee of the
(which has 55 members).
carefully explains why and how the Global Elite defends its power,
profits and privilege against rebellion by the 'unruly exploited
'the Global Power Elite uses NATO and the US military
empire for its worldwide security... The whole system continues
wealth concentration for elites and expanded wretched inequality for
Advocating the importance of systemic change and the
redistribution of wealth, Phillips goes on to argue that,
concentration of protected wealth leads to a crisis of humanity,
whereby poverty, war, starvation, mass alienation, media propaganda,
and environmental devastation are reaching a species-level threat.'
Hence, it is worth
War plays an ongoing and vital role in the exercise of
Elite power to reshape world order to maximize wealth concentration
by the Elite.
If you want further evidence of this, you might find
these recent reports instructive:
But, as the
discussion above and below illustrates, war is not the only
mechanism the Elite uses.
For an account
which focuses on identifying many of the world's largest
corporations, in many industries, and then illustrates the
interlocking nature of corporate ownership while demonstrating that
they are all owned by the same small group of giant asset management
corporations - notably including Vanguard, BlackRock and State
Street - this video is very instructive:
'Monopoly: Who Owns the World?'
And for a penetrating critique
of BlackRock and its overall strategy to acquire vast worldwide
control, including by using its Aladdin investment analysis
technology (which employs massive data collection, artificial
intelligence and machine learning to derive investment insight), see
'BlackRock: Bringing Together Man and Machine' and this
three-part series by James Corbett:
'How BlackRock Conquered the World'.
In the 'Monopoly'
video, you will again see the names of some familiar individuals and
families who own significant shareholdings in these corporations and
asset management firms.
After showcasing families such as the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans, the narrator simply observes
in relation to Vanguard that its,
'largest shareholders are the
private funds and nonprofit organizations of these families'.
And if you think
that national Elites in countries like China and Russia are somehow
not involved in all this, you might find it interesting to read
articles that discuss the wealth and political influence of the
Chinese 'immortals' and the Russian oligarchs.
however, Emanuel Pastreich points out that if anyone attributes
responsibility for Chinese policies in relation to data collection
and control based on QR codes and contact tracing, they inevitably
identify the Chinese government.
'But the truth is that few, or
none, of these policies were made up or implemented by the Chinese
government itself, but rather that the Chinese government is
occupied by IT corporations that report to the billionaires (often
through Israel and the United States) and bypass the Chinese
Pastreich goes on to offer some insight into
how key Elite intelligence and finance corporations are driving the
technocratic social control policies being implemented under cover
of the 'virus' in China.
'The Third Opium War Part One: The agenda behind the COVID-19
assault on China'and
'The Third Opium War Part Two: The True Threat Posed by China'
'Western Tech & China: Who Serves
In fact, as Patrick
Wood points out, referencing a much earlier book of his own and
Professor Antony Sutton - see
Trilaterals Over Washington Volumes I & II -
'Thanks to early members of the [Elite's] Trilateral Commission,
China was brought out of its dark ages Communist dictatorship and
onto the world stage.
Furthermore, the Trilateral Commission
orchestrated and then facilitated a massive transfer of technology
to China in order to build up its non-existent infrastructure...
As a failed Communist dictatorship, China was a blank slate with
over 1.2 billion citizens under its control. However, Chinese
leadership knew nothing about capitalism and free enterprise, and
[key Trilateralist Zbigniew] Brzezinski made no effort to teach them
about it. Instead, he planted seeds of Technocracy...
In the 20-year
period from 1980 to 2000, a transformation took place that was
considered nothing short of an economic miracle; but it was not of
Rather, it can be fully attributed to the masters of
Technocracy within the ranks of the Trilateral Commission.'
listing several key features of China's technocracy (5G, AI, social
credit scores…), Wood concludes that 'China is a full-blown
Technocracy and it is the first of its kind on planet earth.'
this article on China as one of Wood's 12-part series on
'Day 7: China Is A Technocracy'.
And in relation to
Russia, Riley Waggaman simply observes that,
'As for "COVID-triggered"
economic restructuring: the Russian government has openly embraced
the World Economic Forum's Fourth Industrial Revolution.
, the Russian government and the WEF signed a memorandum on
the establishment of a Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
in Russia. Russia has already adopted a law allowing for
"experimental legal regimes" to allow corporations and institutions
to deploy AI and robots into the economy, without being encumbered
by regulatory red tape.
Returning to Gref and his digital Sbercoin:
Russia's central bank is already planning to test-run a digital
ruble that, among other nifty features, could be used to restrict
'I believe we are facing an evil that has no equal in human history'.
to Mikhail Delyagin, a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian
'In the 90s, under Yeltsin, the external management of
global banksters was carried out through the IMF and through
[Russian oligarch Anatoly] Chubais.
Now under Putin, external
management will be done by Big Tech, social global platforms, and
Big Pharma through the WHO. Exactly the same management.'
'Duma deputy: "Protect yourself and
Russia from a coup d'état!". Russian lawmaker issues video appeal to
the nation. Will anyone listen?'
this, bear in mind that the Elite, as well as its agents and
organizations (including those in China and Russia), have vast
wealth stashed in 'secrecy jurisdictions' (better known as tax
locations around the world where wealthy individuals,
criminals and terrorists, as well as governments and government
agencies (such as the CIA), banks, corporations, hedge funds,
international organizations (such as the Vatican) and crime
syndicates (such as the Mafia), can stash their money so that they
can avoid regulation and oversight, and evade tax.
Just how much
wealth is stashed in tax havens?
While this is impossible to know
precisely, it can only be measured in tens of trillions of dollars
as well as an unknown number of gold bricks, artworks, yachts and
'Elite Banking at Your Expense: How Secretive Tax Havens are Used to
Steal Your Money'.
How is this
possible? Well, it is protected by government legislation and legal
systems, with an 'army' of Elite agents - accountants, auditors,
bankers, businesspeople, lawyers and politicians - ensuring that
they remain protected.
The point here is simple:
if you have enough
money, the law simply does not exist...
And you can evade taxes
legally and in the full knowledge that your vast profits (even from
immorally-acquired wealth such as sex trafficking, gun-running,
endangered species trafficking, conflict diamonds and drug
trafficking) are 'lawful' and will escape regulation and oversight
of any kind.
'The Rule of Law: Unjust and Violent'.
But legal systems
facilitate monstrous injustice in other ways too.
For example, they
ensure that owners of corporations are enabled to ruthlessly exploit
both their workers and all taxpayers as well.
For a thoughtful and
straightforward account of how this works, see this article by
Professor James Petras:
'How Billionaires Become Billionaires'.
And to briefly
revisit a subject discussed above: Who owns the
Reserve System now?
According to Dean Henderson writing in 2010,
'the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of
New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of
Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.'
Henderson goes on to state that,
'The control that these banking families exert over the global
economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in
secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any
information exposing these money powers as halfbaked conspiracy
theory. The word "conspiracy" itself has been demonized, much like
the word "communism". Anyone who dare utter the word is quickly
excluded from public debate and written off as insane. Yet the facts
Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen,
Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror
Network, pp. 473-4.
Other scholars in
the field agree.
exceptionally detailed investigation into three major historical
events of the C20th - the Bolshevik Revolution, the rise
of Franklin D. Roosevelt and the rise of Hitler - Professor Antony
Sutton identified the seat of political power in the United States
not as the US Constitution authorized but,
establishment in New York: the private international bankers, more
specifically the financial houses of J.P. Morgan, the
Rockefeller-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank, and in earlier days
(before amalgamation of their Manhattan Bank with the former Chase
Bank), the Warburgs.'
For most of the twentieth century the
Federal Reserve System, particularly the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York (which is outside the control of Congress, unaudited and
uncontrolled, with the power to print money and create credit at
will), has exercised a virtual monopoly over the direction of the
In foreign affairs the Council on Foreign
Relations, superficially an innocent forum for academics,
businessmen, and politicians, contains within its shell, perhaps
unknown to many of its members, a power center that unilaterally
determines U.S. foreign policy.
The major objective of this
submerged - and obviously subversive - foreign policy is the
acquisition of markets and economic power (profits, if you will),
for a small group of giant multi-nationals under the virtual control
of a few banking investment houses and controlling families.
Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler,
So what has
But it is not just
fine scholars who have reached this conclusion. Consider David
Rockefeller's delusionary whitewashing of his own family's key role
in the killing, devastation and destruction outlined above:
even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
"internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world
to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -
one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I
am proud of it... one of the most enduring [conspiracies] is that a
secret group of international bankers and capitalists, and their
minions, control the world's economy... [but these people] ignore
the tangible benefits that have resulted from our active
international role during the past half-century'.
Memoirs, p. 483.
If you are
wondering how all of this happens without any significant pushback
from within elite circles, there is a simple answer:
They are all
insane and control to maximize resource accumulation has become the
perpetual substitute for their destroyed capacity to engage
emotionally in their own lives and empathize with their fellow human
For more detail, see
'Love Denied: The Psychology of Materialism, Violence and War'
'The Global Elite is Insane Revisited'.
So while some of us
occasionally ponder how we can contribute more to improve the human
condition and the state of the world, and then endeavor to do
something along those lines, there are plenty of terrified people
whose daily life is consumed (consciously or unconsciously) by the
'How can I take more?'
And people like that have been
taking more since the dawn of human civilization and, no doubt,
The Global Elite is
simply those who have been insanely ruthless and organized enough to
take more, whatever the cost to humanity and all other life on
The Post World War II
Superstructure to Transform World Order,
World Economy and Capture All Wealth
So how, precisely,
the Global Elite driving the transformation of world order, the
collapse of the world economy and capturing final control of all
There are three
parts to the answer to this question:
foundations progressively laid over the past 5,000 years, as
superstructure (including such institutions as the United
Nations, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund) that
has been built since World War II and, more recently, under the
guise of the United Nation's Sustainable Development agenda, to
impose global governance on the human population and,
particularly, to intrude global financial governance into every
aspect of our lives.
In the words of Iain Davis and Whitney
Webb, this is because the UN's sustainable development goals,
not promote "sustainability" as most conceive it and instead utilise the same debt imperialism long used by the
Anglo-American Empire to entrap nations in a new, equally
predatory system of global financial governance'.
'Sustainable Debt Slavery'
3. The final
part relates to political, economic and, especially,
technological measures being imposed as part of the World
Economic Forum's 'Great Reset' under cover of the fake narrative
If we briefly
consider elements of the post-World War II superstructure, for
example, both the World Bank and International Monetary Fund have
historically used debt to force countries, mostly in the developing
world, to adopt policies that redistribute wealth to the elite via
their banks, corporations and institutions.
But corporations have
employed their own 'economic hit men' to do the same thing:
identifying and 'persuading' leaders of developing nations, using a
variety of devices - ranging from false economic projections and
bribes to military threats and assassinations - to accept enormous
'development' loans for projects which are contracted with western
corporations, countries quickly become entrapped in debt.
then used to force those countries to implement unpopular austerity
policies, deregulate financial and other markets, and privatize
state assets, thus eroding national sovereignty.
The New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
If you want to read
further evidence of the role of the World Bank and the IMF as agents
of Elite policy against nation-states, you might find the US Army's
manual of unconventional warfare interesting.
Special Operations Forces: Unconventional Warfare'.
released by Wikileaks in 2008 and described by them as the US
military's 'regime change handbook', as elaborated by Webb,
U.S. Army states that major global financial institutions, such as,
the World Bank
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
the Bank for
International Settlements (BIS),
...are used as,
financial "weapons in times of conflict up to and including
large-scale general war," as well as in leveraging "the policies and
cooperation of state governments".'
'Leaked Wikileaks Doc Reveals US Military Use of IMF, World Bank as
however, what we have seen since the UN, increasingly a tool of
corporations since the 1990s, adopted its Sustainable Development
Goals is a dramatically expanded set of mechanisms designed to
enslave the bulk of the human population, not just those in
'developing' countries, and take complete control of Earth's
ecosystems and natural processes.
by Remy Steinegger)
initiatives, for example, the Global Public-Private Partnership has
been presented by
Klaus Schwab and Peter Vanham, on behalf of the
World Economic Forum.
Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy that Works for
Progress, People and Planet summarized in
'What is stakeholder capitalism?'
sanitized account obscures the threat it poses to humankind, Iain
Davis and Whitney Webb have thoughtfully critiqued it - see
'Sustainable Debt Slavery' - noting that even a 2016 UN
Department of Economic and Social Affairs report - see
Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Fit
for purpose?' - also found it 'unfit for purpose'.
So what is
According to Davis, the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)
is a worldwide network of stakeholder capitalists and their
the Bank for International Settlements, central banks,
global (including media) corporations, the 'philanthropic'
foundations of multi-billionaires, policy think tanks, governments
(and their agencies), key non-governmental organizations and global
charities, selected academic and scientific institutions, labour
unions and other chosen 'thought leaders'. (You can see an
instructive diagram in the article cited below.)
The G3P controls
the world economy and global finance.
'It sets world, national and
local policy (via global governance) and then promotes those
policies using the mainstream media', typically distributes the
policies through an intermediary such as the IMF, WHO or IPCC and
uses governments to transform G3P global governance into hard
policy, legislation and law at the national level.
'In this way, the
G3P controls many nations at once without having to resort to
legislation. This has the added advantage of making any legal
challenge to the decisions made by the most senior partners in the
G3P (an authoritarian hierarchy) extremely difficult.'
global governance has already superseded the national sovereignty of
states: 'National governments had been relegated to creating the
G3P's enabling environment by taxing the public and increasing
government borrowing debt.'
'What Is the Global Public-Private
As Davis notes:
are supposed to believe that a G3P-led system of global governance
is beneficial for us and to accept that global corporations are
committed to putting humanitarian and environmental causes before
profit, when the conflict of interest is obvious.
requires a considerable degree of naïveté.'
Davis clearly perceives,
'an emergent global, corporate dictatorship that cares not one whit
about truly stewarding the planet.
The G3P will determine the future
state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the
priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the
management of a global commons.
There is no opportunity for any of
us to participate in either their project or the subsequent
formation of policy.'
Davis goes on:
'in theory, governments do not
have to implement G3P policy, in reality they do. Global policies
have been an increasing facet of our lives in the post-WW2 era... It
doesn't matter who you elect, the policy trajectory is set at the
global governance level.
This is the dictatorial nature of the G3P
and nothing could be less democratic.'
was launched at the COP26 conference in November 2021.
Glasgow Financial Alliance for
Net Zero (GFANZ) is an industry-led and UN-convened alliance of
private banking and financial institutions that announced plans to
overhaul the role of global and regional financial institutions,
including the World Bank and IMF, as part of a broader plan to
'transform' the global financial system.
'Our progress and plan towards a net-zero global economy'.
But this report
makes it clear that GFANZ will simply employ the same exploitative
tactics that the 'economic hitmen' and agents such as the
multilateral 'development' banks (MDBs), including,
the World Bank,
Inter-American Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, the African
Development Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and
...have long used to force even greater deregulation on
'developing' countries to facilitate supposedly climate and
environmentally-friendly investments by alliance members. In fact,
composed of several "subsector alliances", including the
Net Zero Asset
Managers Initiative, the
Net Zero Asset Owner Alliance and the
Banking Alliance, GFANZ commands,
'a formidable part of global
private banking and finance interests'.
Moreover, the 'largest
financial players' who dominate GFANZ include the CEOs of BlackRock,
Citi, Bank of America, Banco Santander and HSBC as well as the CEO
of the London Stock Exchange Group and chair of the Investment
Committee of the David Rockefeller Fund.
In essence then, as
Webb goes on to explain it:
proposed increase in private-sector involvement in MDBs, such as
the World Bank and regional development banks, alliance members
seek to use MDBs to globally impose massive and extensive
deregulation on developing countries by using the
decarbonization push as justification.
No longer must MDBs
entrap developing nations in debt to force policies that benefit
foreign and multinational private-sector entities, as climate
change-related justifications can now be used for the same
has cloaked itself in lofty rhetoric of 'saving the planet,' its
plans ultimately amount to a corporate-led coup that will make
the global financial system even more corrupt and predatory and
further reduce the sovereignty of national governments in the
'UN-Backed Banker Alliance Announces "Green" Plan to Transform
the Global Financial System'.
But, again, it is
not just their fellow human beings over whom the Elite wants total
control. They want that control over nature too, and that is yet
another project in which the Elite has been long engaged.
Hence, in September
2021, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced the launch of a
new asset class, jointly developed with
Group (IEG) - whose founding investors included the
Inter-American Development Bank and the Rockefeller Foundation - for
Natural Asset Companies:
'sustainable enterprises that hold the
rights to ecosystem services' that enable natural asset owners, 'to
convert nature's value into financial capital, providing additional
resources necessary to power a sustainable future'.
According to the
'Natural areas, underpinned by biodiversity, are inherently
valuable in and of themselves.'
Either unaware of their ignorance or, perhaps, making
hypocritically tokenistic use of some key words often-expressed by
indigenous peoples and deep ecologists (including the inventor of
the term 'deep ecology', Professor Arne Naess, in his 1973 article
'The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement') - the
IEG goes on to express this 'value' in strictly economic terms:
'They also contribute life supporting services upon which humanity
and the global economy depends.
These include provisioning services
such as food, water, timber, and genetic resources; regulating
services that affect climate, floods, disease, and water quality;
cultural services that provide recreational, aesthetic, and
spiritual benefits; and supporting services such as soil formation,
photosynthesis, and nutrient cycling.'
And in its report
on this subject, the World Economic Forum's Global Future Council on
Nature-Based Solutions urged investors, corporations and governments,
'to create and strengthen market-based mechanisms for valuing
'Scaling Investments in Nature: The Next Critical Frontier for
Private Sector Leadership', p.14.
IEG's delusional conception of how further business investment in
natural resources will work, Douglas Eger, the CEO of IEG, suggests
'This new asset class on the NYSE will create a virtuous cycle
of investment in nature that will help finance sustainable
development for communities, companies and countries.'
wonder how. But IEG's motives are more likely revealed in this fact:
'The asset class was developed to enable exposure to the
opportunities created by the estimated $125 trillion annual global
ecosystem services market, encompassing areas such as carbon
sequestration, biodiversity and clean water.'
'NYSE to List New "Natural Asset Companies" Asset Class, Targeting
Massive Opportunity in Ecosystem Services'.
Hence, to clarify:
corporations are now engaged in the largest land and resource grab
This will enable Elite corporations to privately own the
ecosystem services of a pristine rainforest, a majestic waterfall
plunging into a lagoon, an expansive grassland, a picturesque cave,
a magnificent wetland, a trout-filled lake, a beautiful coral reef
or other natural area and then sell clean air, fresh water,
pollination services, food, medicines, and a range of biodiversity
services such as the enjoyment of nature, while displacing the
world's remaining indigenous populations.
So what about the
'The Commons is property shared by all, inclusive of
natural products like air, water, and a habitable planet, forests,
fisheries, groundwater, wetlands, pastures, the atmosphere, the high
seas, Antarctica, outer space, caves, all part of ecosystems of the
Or are corporations finally about to own the Commons as
'Mother Nature, Inc.'
Are we to reduce
everything in nature to its value as a profit-making commodity?
As Robert Hunziker
concludes his own critique of this initiative:
'The sad truth is
Mother Nature, Inc. will lead to extinction of The Commons, as an
institution, in the biggest heist of all time. Surely, private
ownership of nature is unseemly and certainly begs a much bigger
relevant question that goes to the heart of the matter, to wit:
Should nature's ecosystems, which benefit society at large, be
monetized for the direct benefit of the few?'
'Mother Nature, Inc.'
More could be
written about this, as Webb, for example, has done in
'Wall Street's Takeover of Nature Advances with Launch of New Asset
But if you believe
that corporations - extensively documented to destroy pristine
natural environments in their rapacious efforts to exploit fossil
fuels, minerals, rainforest products and a vast range of other
products, as well as force indigenous peoples off their land to do
so: see, for example,
'Seven (of Hundreds) Environmental Nightmares Created by Open Pit
Mines (and the Obligatory Tailings Ponds) that have Caused
Irremediable, Highly Toxic Contamination Downstream',
to become 'virtuous investors' in nature when 4 billion years of
Earth's history and 200,000 years of indigenous people living
harmoniously with nature have an impeccable record of preserving
ecosystems and their services, without the involvement of these
'virtuous investors', then you will do extremely well on any
gullibility test you attempt.
The Coup de Grâce: The Great
millennia of learning how to structure and manage an economy to
accumulate and consolidate control and wealth in particular hands,
the Global Elite launched its final coup in January 2020 under cover
of the fake Covid-19 'pandemic'.
Using the health threat supposedly
implied by the existence of a pathogenic 'virus', the bulk of the
world population was terrorized into submitting to an onerous series
of violations of their human rights which was tantamount to a
declaration of martial law.
'The Final Battle For Humanity: It Is "Now or Never" In The Long War
Against Homo Sapiens'.
Under a barrage of
propaganda delivered by Elite agents - including organizations such
as the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the World Health
Organization, governments, the pharmaceutical industry and corporate
media as well as individuals such as,
...people were compelled to wear masks, use QR codes,
stay locked down in their homes and, later, submit to a series of
experimental but involuntary gene-altering bioweapons to acquire a
'vaccine passport', among other measures.
importantly, these restrictions effectively shut down the mainstream
economy with vast sectors of industry either closed outright or
unable to function in the absence of locked-down or, later,
bioweapon-injured or bioweapon-killed staff.
For just one discussion
of the vast evidence available of Covid-19 'vaccine' injuries and
'3.5 BILLION could be injured or killed by the jab. Are YOU ready?'
which is briefly discussed here:
'Dr. David Martin blasts health authorities for turning roughly 4
billion people into "bioweapons factories".'
adversely impacted the entire supply chain:
That is, the process
that connects the production of raw materials, such as food grown on
farms and minerals mined from the Earth, to factories that produce
everything from canned food to computers, and then to outlets that
sell these products to the public.
All components of this chain were
either shut down completely at one or more times, as part of the
imposed restrictions or other policy measures - watch, for example,
'Biden pays farms to STOP - EU out of Feed - Meat taxes & Chicken
permits - Up to you to GROW FOOD!' - or just substantially
curtailed by the unavailability of essential inputs, ranging from
replacement parts to competent labour.
matters, the transport industry (trucking, railroads, shipping,
airlines) was also effectively shut down, containers became
unavailable (because they were in the wrong places) and logistics
corporations (that organize the movement of trade goods) were
disabled, including by cyber attacks.
The airline and tourist
industries were just two industries that were profoundly disrupted.
But so was much of small business, with many businesses destroyed.
As a result, hundreds of millions of people lost employment, many
permanently, throughout the industrial economies and millions more
were starved to death in Africa, Asia and Central/South America
because the day-to-day economy, by which many survive, was shuttered
and any ameliorative measures by governments and international
organizations were, deliberately, woefully inadequate (or were
siphoned into elite wallets).
'The Global Elite's "Kill and Control" Agenda: Destroying Our Food
But 'behind the
(obvious) scenes' outlined above, there has been a great deal more
going on that has been deliberately concealed from public view, and
this has been considered and discussed by some fine analysts.
Catherine Austin Fitts, using 'national security' as the
justification, the U.S. National Security Act 1947 and the CIA Act
1949 were the basis of a series of Acts and Executive Orders that
'created a secrecy machinery' which essentially meant that 'the most
powerful financial interests in the world can keep a whole bunch of
money secret', thus creating a secret black budget.
And, starting in
1998, according to US federal government documentation, huge sums of
money were not accounted for while private equity firms began
exploding and, despite having no capacity to raise such amounts,
were suddenly investing huge sums of money in emerging markets.
According to Fitts,
'we are now missing over $US21 trillion', which
she calls a 'financial coup d'etat' that is clearly in 'massive
violation' of the US constitution.
The financial value of what has
transpired under the Covid-19 narrative is that the 'magic virus'
can be used to explain, for example, why there is no money for
healthcare or pension funds cannot pay on retirement those who paid
into them throughout their lives.
'We Need to Talk about Mr Global - Part Two' with a simple
'The Real Game of Missing Money'.
But if $US21
trillion missing already sounds like a lot, it doesn't end there, as
Fitt's recent discussion with Professor Mark Skidmore makes
perfectly clear in 'The
Financial Coup: More Missing Money & FASAB Standard 56'.
We are now over
$US100 trillion of undocumentable adjustments if we use their
most recent figures and so I would say we are describing a
financial system which is completely and utterly out of
If any of the allegations about financial fraud in
the 2020 [US Presidential] election are true, and I believe that
many of them are, we've now delinked both the election system
and the finances [from] the constitution and the law so we are
are now operating both in terms of who governs and how they
spend the money completely outside of the law and completely
outside of any democratic process.
So this is a coup.
To which Professor
The reason that
I really struggled... watching what was going on during the last
financial crisis, [was that] I thought 'Wow we don't have the
rule of law'.
It was so obvious that we didn't ten years ago and
it's like it's devolving even more and so I am not sure how much
further we can go before we are just completely devoid of the
rule of law at least for a subset of the very powerful.
As an aside, while
genuinely appreciative of the research of Fitts and Skidmore, as
outlined earlier in this article and previously demonstrated,
democracy has always been a sham and the Elite has always operated
beyond the rule of law, routinely corrupting national political
processes in pursuit of Elite ends.
'The Elite Coup to Kill or Enslave Us: Why Can't Governments, Legal
Actions and Protests Stop Them?'
All we are seeing in the
current context is Elite corruption being flaunted in a way that
reflects the sure knowledge that it can act corruptly, on a global
scale, with impunity.
But to return to
the subject at hand: In 2019, the central bankers of the G7
countries met for their regular conference at Jackson Hole, Wyoming
and agreed to the 'Going Direct Reset', a plan devised (and later
orchestrated) by BlackRock - see
'Dealing with the next downturn' - and, as explained by John
Titus, the fundamental purpose of this 'Reset' was to orchestrate
the largest asset transfer in history under cover of the
forthcoming Covid-19 'pandemic'.
'Larry & Carstens' Excellent Pandemic' with a summary here:
'Summary - Going Direct Reset'.
In the words of
'In a nutshell, the arrival of the 2020 pandemic was about as
accidental as an assassination. The pandemic narrative is nothing
but a cover story to conceal from the public what in reality is the
biggest asset transfer ever.'
'Summary - Going Direct Reset'.
While you can learn
the mechanics of how this was conducted in the excellent documents
and videos immediately above, as Fitts points out in relation to the
'Controlling and having access to data on fiscal and
monetary policy is the basis of huge fortunes.'
And, combined with
the secrecy that has protected their manipulations from public view,
'if you look at all the technology and assets that have been
transferred, by questionable means, into private and corporate
hands, the liability is over the top',
...it has engendered the view
that their only way forward is,
'complete, total central control'.
How will this
'total control' be achieved? One key element will be the
introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
The fundamental value of digitized systems, from the elite
perspective, is that they enable centralized control.
creating CBDCs the financial transaction control grid becomes the
means by which you enable centralized control; that is, slavery.
'We Need to Talk about Mr Global - Part Two'.
How does this work?
CBDCs allow the Central Bank to determine exactly what products and
services your digital currency can be spent on, when it can spent
and where it can be spent. It also allows the issuing authority to
freeze, reduce or empty your bank account, and to alter its
functionality with the latest 'update', based on your 'social credit
score', political allegiance or if you do not comply with certain
directives. But it goes beyond this.
According to the
Bank for International Settlements:
The G20 has
made enhancing cross-border payments a global priority and has
identified CBDC as a potential way forward to improving such
A "holy grail" solution for cross-border payments is
one which allows such payments to be immediate, cheap,
universally accessible and settled in a secure settlement
medium. For wholesale payments, central bank money is the
preferred medium for financial market infrastructures.
platform upon which multiple central banks can issue and
exchange their respective CBDCs is a particularly promising
solution for achieving this vision, and mBridge is a wholesale
multi-CBDC project that aims to advance towards this goal. It
builds on previous work...
Project mBridge tests the hypothesis
that an efficient, low-cost, real-time and scalable cross-border
multi-CBDC arrangement can provide a network of direct central
bank and commercial participant connectivity and greatly
increase the potential for international trade flows and
cross-border business at large...
All the while safeguarding
currency sovereignty and monetary and financial stability by
appropriately integrating policy, regulatory and legal
compliance, and privacy considerations.
Connecting economies through CBDC'.
Apart from the fact
that the G20 governments are distinctly unrepresentative of the
world's people, these words are typical of the type usually chosen
when the Elite is intent on sugarcoating their lies to conceal their
Agustin Carstens of the Bank for International Settlements has been
'We don't know, for example, who's using a $100
bill today, we don't know who is using a 1,000 peso bill today.
key difference with the CBDC is the central bank will have absolute
control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of
that expression of central bank liability, and also we will have the
technology to enforce that.'
Payments: A Vision for the Future'.
And here is the Bank of
England advising government ministers in the UK on the issue of
England tells ministers to intervene on digital currency
For a more detailed explanation, see
'What Is Programmable Money?'
And for an update on progress in
your country, see
'CBDC: A Country-by-Country Guide'.
however, it is worthwhile noting the conflict that is going on
between the central banks and the commercial banks (the traditional
actors in the retail banking sector, that is, the part of banking
where people interact directly with a bank), as well as that between
the commercial banks and the big tech companies, such as PayPal,
Alipay, Facebook and Amazon that have developed or are developing
their own digital currencies and/or payments systems outside the
traditional financial system.
While non-bank financial institutions
long-ago overtook commercial banks in lending, bank influence
generally continues to decline and is accelerating in the face of
the competition from the technology giants.
Why the conflict?
Because a CBDC risks collapsing the commercial banking sector
completely by eliminating retail banking and thus destabilizing the
long-standing financial system.
For some discussion of this, watch
Alice Fulwood's presentation
'Could digital currencies put banks out of business?'
no doubt, of course, that this conflict will be resolved and that it
will not be in our favor.
In any case, CBDCs
are just one feature of their planned technocracy which includes
digitizing your identity, issuing you a social credit score,
geofencing you in one of the Elite's 'smart cities' and feeding you
insects and processed trash, among many other elements.
And to elaborate
the significance of imprisoning you in a 'smart' city, Patrick Wood
points out the evidence both in the literature and in practice:
intention is to force us off the land, as is already happening in
China, and at gunpoint if necessary, so that 'vacated farm land' can
be combined 'into giant factory farms to be operated by advanced
technology such as agricultural robots and automated tractors'.
relocated into the 'smart' city of the government's choice, everyone
will be subject to 24 hour surveillance using a plethora of 'smart'
technologies such as biometric facial scanning, geospatial tracking
and CBDCs, forced onto public transport which will not include the
option of leaving the city, and confined to those work and other
activities approved by the relevant technocrats.
'Day 9: Technocracy And Smart Cities'.
The bottom line, in
simple language however, is the same as it has always been:
Endlessly acting to consolidate their control over the rest of us,
our money is being stolen by the Elite for their own ends and they
are not required to report it and they cannot be held accountable,
legally or otherwise.
The only difference to what has happened
historically is that now even the pretense of some form of equity,
the rule of law and even the notion of democracy are being abandoned
in the final rush to techno-totalitarianism and wealth
however, other components of the elite program are designed to play
a part in destroying human society and the global economy.
summary of these, see
'Killing Off Humanity: How The Global Elite Is Using Eugenics And
Transhumanism To Shape Our Future'.
Collapsing the Global Economy
Not content with
these measures, however, the war in central Asia was precipitated by
the Elite to advance key elements of their program.
portrayed by most politicians and corporate media as a war between
Russia and Ukraine, many thoughtful analysts perceive some of the
deeper strands of what has occurred:
Since the collapse of the
Soviet Union and NATO commitments made at the end of the Cold War,
NATO has consistently violated those commitments and there has been
routine Ukrainian attacks on Donetsk and Luhansk over the past eight
These and other events have ensured a long but steady 'lead
time' in the final build up to the war, precipitating the military
response of Russia, as intended.
For just four thoughtful analyses,
Obscured by the
war, however, the leaderships of both Russia and Ukraine are heavily
involved in the World Economic Forum and both have been heavily
committed to imposing the elite agenda on their populations.
the Russia-Ukraine war serves elite purposes well with
consequences including even greater disruption of food and fuel
supply chains than the 'Great Reset' was able to achieve alone.
'The War in Ukraine: Understanding and Resisting the Global Elite's
sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 & 2 gas pipelines - see
War: New Developments' - might be seen through various lenses
but, again, it serves elite purposes well.
As Tom Luongo noted:
important thing I keep trying to point out [is] that thinking in
terms of "country" is ultimately the wrong lens to view these
people's actions. Factions are the better lens.
'The Curious Whodunit of Nordstreams 1 and 2'.
Given that the
sabotage of these two pipelines is seriously exacerbating the energy
crisis in Europe, while displacing people's anger onto one or other
parties in the war, as always the elite forces driving destruction
of the world economy escape scrutiny.
Beyond this, on 7
October 2022 the Biden Administration dealt a 'nuclear' strike to
the hi-tech industry by imposing onerous new export rules that cut
off supply of essential technology (advanced semiconductors,
chip-making equipment and supercomputer components) to China,
immediately and adversely impacting Chinese production.
'Implementation of Additional Export Controls: Certain Advanced
Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items'.
pain this will inflict on the Chinese, it will inflict far more pain
on ordinary people who will be required to deal with the outcomes of
this latest supply-chain disruption: higher prices, more battered
household budgets and fewer families able to scrape by on shrinking
'Biden's Tech-War Goes Nuclear' and
'US Economic War on China Threatens Global Microchip Industry'.
In any case, the
ongoing destruction of the global economy will continue even while,
apparently, considerable effort is being made to restructure key
elements of it, such as those in relation to trade relations, trade
routes, currencies and international banking being undertaken in
various international fora.
For one discussion of these ongoing
'Russia, India, China, Iran: the Quad that really matters'.
But, again, how
serious are these efforts when all governments are collaborating
closely on the fundamental Elite program? At one of these meetings,
recently concluded, the G20 Summit in Bali - see
Leaders' Declaration' - Moscow, Beijing, Washington and all
other governments present, agreed to,
'the creation of a global
health-preserving Pandemic Fund sponsored by the WHO, the World
Bank, Bill Gates, and the Rockefeller Foundation.
The fund will
ensure there is plenty of money for experimental genetic vaccines in
the weeks, months, and decades ahead.'
Beyond this, however, the
'purple prose' about 'digital transformation',
'interoperability of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) for
...and other elements of the Elite's
As Riley Waggaman observed:
heart-warming that even amidst ceaseless geopolitical squabbling,
Moscow and the Collective West can sit down at the negotiating
table, break bread, and agree to cattle-tag the entire world.'
'World leaders agree to cattle-tag the planet'.
And while a recent
World Economic Forum report, based on the views of 50 chief
economists from around the world, sanitized economic prospects by
simply referring to a likely forthcoming 'recession' either in 2022
or 2023, spokesperson Saadia Zahidi couldn't avoid mentioning the
heavy consensus that real wages will decline, poverty will increase
and 'social unrest is expected to continue to rise' in response to
rises in the cost of living, particularly due to production and
supply chain disruptions in fuel and food supplies.
'Special Agenda Dialogue on the Future of the Global Economy'.
Taking a similarly
'moderate' stance, in its recent 'World Economic Outlook', the
International Monetary Fund warned that 'More than a third of the
global economy will contract this year or next, while the three
largest economies - the United States, the European Union, and China
- will continue to stall. In short, the worst is yet to come, and
for many people 2023 will feel like a recession.' See
'World Economic Outlook - Countering the Cost-of-Living Crisis'.
At the media briefing to launch the report, the Director of the
IMF's Research Department, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, noted that,
'the global economy is headed for stormy waters' and 'Too many
low-income countries are close to or are already in debt distress.
Progress toward orderly debt restructuring... is urgently needed to
avert a wave of sovereign debt crises. Time may soon run out.'
Press Briefing Annual Meetings 2022'.
But other reports
suggest something far worse.
Summarizing his own
extensive research on the subject over the past three years, in a
recent interview Professor Michel Chossudovsky simply explains what
triggered the economic collapse, referring to the origin of the
crisis with decisions made in early 2020:
'This is really Economics
101:... the announcement of the lockdown... implies the confinement of
the labor force on the one hand and the freezing of the workplace on
The answer is obvious: Collapse! Economic
and social collapse on an unprecedented basis because it was
implemented simultaneously in 190 countries.'
'The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d'Etat Against Humanity'.
Noting the complete
failure of authorities to hold even one corporate executive to
account for the financial collapse they caused in 2008 - when
banking institutions intentionally sold securities they knew were
bad to defraud customers and increase their own profits, as
carefully reported in a 'Frontline' documentary in 2013 - Dr Joseph Mercola argues that the,
'same criminal bankers are now intentionally
destroying the global financial system in order to replace it with
something even worse - social credit scores, digital identity and
Central Banking Digital Currencies (CBDCs), which will give them the
ability to control not only your individual finances but also
everything else in your life'.
Apparently unaware of the extensive
lead time on what is happening, he goes on to observe that,
now at the point where banksters have self-selected themselves to
rule the whole world, tossing notions of democracy, freedom and
human dignity in the waste bin along the way.'
'Who Is Behind the Economic Collapse?'
As explained above,
these 'banksters' operate beyond the rule of law too.
According to the
Irish economist Philip Pilkington:
'The Western world today faces a
serious risk of slipping into another Great Depression. This risk
has arisen... due to global economic relations deteriorating to the
point of all out warfare.'
Noting the critical importance of the
sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, leaving Europe with,
'insufficient access to energy, the price of energy in Europe will
remain extremely high for years to come.
European industry, for
which energy is a key input, will become uncompetitive.'
next Great Depression? Economic warfare has severe implications'.
According to former
BlackRock manager, Edward Dowd, the outcome of what has been
happening, which is being accelerated by the corruption that has
plagued Wall Street since the 1990s, is that the forthcoming
financial collapse is a 'mathematical certainty' and will occur
within the next six to 24 months.
'Ex-BlackRock Manager: Global Financial Collapse a "Mathematical
Or, in the words of
strategic risk consultant William Engdahl:
What is coming in the
months ahead, barring a dramatic policy reversal 'is
the worst economic depression in history to date'.
'Global Planned Financial Tsunami Has Just Begun'.
After listing a
sequence of industry shutdowns and other measures in Europe because
of energy shortages, Michael Snyder simply observes that,
what an economic collapse looks like',
...notes the prospect (also
predicted by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and, as we saw
above, the World Economic Forum) of 'civil unrest' and warns that,
'Europe is going to descend into "the new Dark Ages" this winter,
and the entire world will experience extreme pain as a result.'
'This Winter, Europe Plunges Into "The New Dark Ages"'.
According to Irina
Slav, countries of the European Union have suffered a consistent
decline in gas and electricity consumption this year amid
Businesses are shutting down factories,
downsizing or relocating, while production of such basic products as
steel, zinc, aluminium, chemicals, plastics and ceramics has been
cut substantially, if not slashed dramatically.
Observing that the
European Union is heading for a recession that is,
'quite clear to
anyone watching the indicators' she goes on to state that 'Europe
may well be on the way to deindustrialization'.
'Europe May See Forced De-Industrialization As Result Of Energy
Dr. Seshadri Kumar
He has offered an intensively detailed critique of the
economic fallout from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and events such
as the sanctions against Russia and the sabotage of the Nord Stream
1 & 2 gas pipelines.
Following his careful analysis, he notes a
series of conclusions including that,
'The scarcity of oil and gas,
combined with the scarcity of commodities, will lead to the
De-Industrialization of Europe in short order.'
needs what Russia has (and what China has). It cannot do without
those things. But Russia (and China) can do without what Europe has.
They are self-sufficient. The financial impact of European sanctions
on Russia is minimal.
Therefore, economic sanctions against Russia
(or China) will never work.
But, because of the overwhelming
dependence of Europe on Russian (and Chinese) goods, sanctions on
Russia (or China) will utterly destroy Europe.
The only hope for
Europe to prevent a total economic catastrophe is to achieve an
agreement with Russia that ends the current destructive sanctions as
soon as possible, and at whatever political cost, including the
abandonment of Ukraine and cession of Ukrainian territory to Russia.
The longer this is postponed, the more extensive the permanent
economic damage to Europe will be….
World Order is taking birth before our eyes….
sanctions on Russia will be seen in hindsight as Europe's Stalingrad
as well as its Waterloo.
'The Coming European Economic Apocalypse'.
Commenting on the
banking system, precious metals businessman Stefan Gleason warns
'The global fractional-reserve banking system is teetering on
the brink of failure.
Financial strains are exposing major banks as
under-capitalized and ill prepared to weather additional strains
from high inflation, rising interest rates, and a weakening economy.
Banks operating outside the United States are presently most
A spike in interest rates concomitant with a spike in
the exchange rate of the Federal Reserve note "dollar" is wreaking
havoc in global debt markets and driving capital flight. Many
analysts fear bank runs are coming.
They are already hitting
'Banks on the Brink: Is Your Money
imposition of technologies associated with the fourth industrial
revolution and the war in Ukraine are impacting the labor force,
among a wide variety of other impacts on society as a whole, 'Winter
Oak' observes that while anticipating future employment trends is
'the combined threat of pandemics and wars means the labour force is on the brink of an unprecedented reshuffle with
technology reshaping logistics, potentially threatening hundreds of
millions of blue and white collar jobs, resulting in the greatest
and fastest displacement of jobs in history and foreshadowing a
labour market shift which was previously inconceivable.'
nation state model is being upended 'by a global technocracy,
consisting of an unelected consortium of leaders of industry,
central banking oligarchs and private financial institutions, most
of which are predominantly non-state corporate actors attempting to
restructure global governance and enlist themselves in the global
'The Great Reset Phase 2: War'.
simply observes that,
'the financial order we have known our whole
lives is slated for destruction'.
The demolition of the economy
provides cover to conceal implementation of other key elements of
the elite plan in which all fit neatly together:
introduce the digital ID. The digital ID provides the infrastructure
for the CBDCs. The CBDCs provide a mechanism for enforcement of a
social credit system.'
As Corbett notes:
'To see these events as
separate events unfolding haphazardly and coincidentally is to miss
the entire point.'
'The Controlled Demolition of the Economy'.
And, according to a
source cited by Anviksha Patel, executives at the giant hedge-fund
firm Elliott Management Corp. recently sent a letter to investors
advising that the world is 'on the path to hyperinflation' which
could lead ,
'global societal collapse and civil or international
'Hedge-fund giant Elliott warns looming hyperinflation could lead to
"global societal collapse".'
Among many other
commentaries offering insight into one or more aspects of what is
happening, Oxfam documents the fact that 'billionaires in the food
and energy sectors are increasing their fortunes by $1 billion
dollars every two days' and that a new billionaire is being created
every 30 hours while nearly a million people are being pushed
into extreme poverty at nearly the same rate.
'Pandemic creates new billionaire every 30 hours - now a million
people could fall into extreme poverty at same rate in 2022'.
But perhaps the
most evocative account of what is transpiring is offered by Egon von
Greyerz, founder and managing partner of Matterhorn Asset Management
in Switzerland, a company that has,
'always held a deep respect for
analyzing and managing risk':
By the end of the 1990s, it was clear,
'that global [financial] risk was growing increasingly apparent as
debts and derivative levels rapidly rose'.
Matterhorn Asset Management: History.
Noting that laws
governing the functioning of modern economies ensure that,
banker, no company management or business owner ever has to take the
loss personally if he makes a mistake.
profits are capitalized. Heads I win, Tails I don't lose!'
goes on to note that 'there are honorable exceptions.'
banks still operate in accordance with the principle of unlimited
personal liability for the partners/owners which clearly encourages
a responsible, ethical approach to the conduct of business.
the global financial system and governments applied that principle,
imagine how different the world would look not just financially but
If we had such a system, he contends, then human
values would come before adoration of 'the golden calf'.
evaluation of an investment proposal or a loan would be based on a
judgment about its soundness economically and ethically, as well as
a judgment that the risk of loss was minimal, rather than just the
size of the personal profit it might return.
Instead, since 1971
(when President Nixon unilaterally terminated convertibility of the
US dollar into gold, effectively ending the 1944 Bretton Woods
'governments and central banks have contributed to the
creation of almost $300 trillion of new money plus quasi money in
the form of unfunded liabilities and derivatives ['the most
dangerous and aggressive financial instrument of destruction'] of
$2.2 quadrillion making $2.5 [quadrillion] in total.
explodes, the world could easily face a debt burden of $3
quadrillion by 2025-2030.'
At the same time,
'Central banks around
the world hold $2 trillion [in gold reserves].'
The outcome is
'with over $2 quadrillion (2 and 15 zeros) of debt and
liabilities resting on a foundation of $2 trillion of
government-owned gold that makes a gold coverage of 0.1% or a
leverage of 1000X!... an inverse pyramid with a very weak foundation.'
Noting that a sound financial system 'needs a very solid foundation
of real money' it is simply the case that quadrillions of debt and
'can not survive resting on this feeble amount of gold.
So the $2 quadrillion financial weapon of mass destruction is now on
the way to totally destroy the system.
This is a global house of
cards that will collapse at some point in the not too distant
future... No government and no central bank can solve the problem
that they have created.
More of the same just won't work.'
'$2 Quadrillion Debt Precariously Resting on $2 Trillion Gold'.
The most likely
outcome, according to Greyerz:
'The dollar will go to ZERO and the
US will default. The same will happen to most countries.'
'In the End the $ Goes to Zero and the US Defaults'.
summary then, according to Greyerz, is this:
'This system will start
'The whole banking system is rotten. With the problems
in Europe now it is actually a critical situation...
We have a two
... the rich are still rich but the poor are really poor.
And you see that in every country in the world now...
got enough money to live... This is going to be a human disaster of
major proportions: it's so sad and governments will not have any
chance of doing anything about it.'
In the US outside the
'the poverty is incredibly high and people live
in boxes... poverty is everywhere and sadly, we are only seeing the
beginning and there is no solution...
From a human point of view, we
are looking at a major disaster.'
'$2.5 Quadrillion Disaster Waiting to Happen'.
Will action be
taken to halt the collapse? According to alternative economist
Brandon Smith, it won't.
'What if the goal of the Fed
is the destruction of the middle class?...
What if they are luring
investors into markets with rumors of a pivot, tricking those
investors into pumping money back into markets and then triggering
losses yet again with more rate hikes and hawkish language?
this is a wealth destruction steam valve?
What if it's a trap?
present this idea because we have seen this before in the US, from
1929 through the 1930s during the Great Depression.
The Fed used
very similar tactics to systematically destroy middle class wealth
and consolidate power for the international banking elites.'
'This is an engineered crash, not an accidental crash.'
'Markets Are Expecting The Federal Reserve To Save Them - It's Not
Going To Happen'.
And that, of
course, is the point: the crash has been engineered.
In summarizing the
ongoing collapse of European infrastructure and industry, and energy
shortages in the USA, Mike Adams notes that the,
decimating the pillars of civilization in order to cause collapse
and depopulation... The overarching goal is to exterminate the vast
majority of the human population, then enslave the survivors.'
'Dark Times: Industry and infrastructure collapsing by the day
across Europe and the USA'.
But this is no
All that any thoughtful observer needs to do is consider
history, listen to what the Global Elite is telling us they are
doing, observe them doing it, and then simply inform people what is
The destruction of the global economy, as part of the
fundamental reshaping of world order.
After all, the
Elite has been crystal clear.
It's fundamental aim is to kill off a
substantial proportion of the human population and reduce those
humans and transhumans left alive to slavery while confined in their
technocratic prison; even wealth concentration is ancillary to that,
although a product of it.
'The Elite Coup to Kill or Enslave Us: Why Can't Governments, Legal
Actions and Protests Stop Them?'
And if you crash the global
economy denying people regular food, energy to stay warm and the
capacity to communicate effectively, most of those left alive will
be inclined to submit to whatever conditions they are offered in
order to survive.
How bad does your technocratic prison sound now?
Even if you are eating insects?
So, to reiterate a vital point,
Elite agenda in relation to the economy is intimately related to its
wider agenda in relation to eugenics and technocracy...!
In an interview
about her recently published book - see
One Nation Under Blackmail: The sordid union between
Intelligence and Organized Crime that gave rise to Jeffrey Epstein
- Whitney Webb simply observes that,
'we are being herded into a techno-feudalism, slavery... there's a lot of different names for it
going around but it's not good and it's organized crime running the
Elaborating, Webb explained that,
'They're looking at
feudalism and how do you create a class of slaves that cannot even
cognitively rebel ever again.'
'How Elites Will Create a New Class of Slaves'.
How will this
While it will obviously require several of the range of
measures being introduced, particularly including the deployment of
5G, the digitization of your identity and the utilization of a range
of other technologies such as artificial intelligence and geofencing,
here is what Clive Thompson, retired Managing Director of Union Bancaire Privée in Switzerland, believes might happen:
I think its
quite likely that the CBDC will arrive and it will also be the
subject of the currency reset at the same time. At some point
the world is going to go into a crisis or a country is going to
go into a crisis...
When that happens I think they will close
the banks, you will wake up on a Sunday morning and hear the
news that they've shut the banks, they're not going to open on
Then by Monday evening or Tuesday you'll get the
announcement that we're having a new currency - the CBDC - and
don't worry it will be one-to-one against the old currency but
there will be some restrictions on your ability to convert your
old money into the new money.
So if you're
poor and you have a small bank account it will be converted
one-to-one straight away, and you'll probably even find that you
get a free gift from the government to kickstart the system,
maybe three or five thousand pounds will be given to every
citizen gratuitously to kickstart the new system to the new
But if you have a hundred thousand or a million in the
bank you're going to be told,
'Yes, it's one-to-one but you're
going to have to wait to convert it to the new currency.'
"wait" means "never", we all know that. But they won't tell you
They'll say it's a temporary suspension because we're in
the middle of a crisis, the people are rioting in the street, we
need to calm the system so,
'Here's some free money everybody, go
and enjoy yourselves.'…
So I think the
CBDC will arrive as a consequence of a crisis and when that
happens there will be a limitation on how much of your old
currency you can convert, at one-to-one, with the new one...
the advantage of this, from the government's point of view, is
it's to all intents and purposes wiping the slate clean because
all their liabilities will be denominated in a currency that
nobody can use, nobody can spend.
'The Currency Reset Will Wipe Out Creditors and Usher in CBDCs.
In preparing to
cope with the disruption this must inevitably cause, among other
assets that would be critically useful while retaining value, such
Thompson suggests gold and
silver (including gold and silver coins)
collectibles (such as art and rarer coins)
machine and other tools
'The Currency Reset Will Wipe Out
Creditors and Usher in CBDCs. Part 2.'
Of course, Thompson
might be wrong in his prediction of precisely how the technocratic
state will ultimately be imposed.
But imposed it will be, one way or
another, unless we are effectively resisting the foundational
components of the Elite program.
Is cryptocurrency part of
Many people are
suggesting cryptocurrencies as one way around some of the problems
However, the very basis of sound economy for any world that
is unfolding is self-reliance, particularly in relation to essential
needs around food, water, clothing, shelter and energy, within a
local, sustainable community that is as self-sufficient as possible,
and able to nonviolently defend itself.
Complemented by use
of local markets and trading schemes - whether using local
currencies or goods and services directly - this will maximize
economic survival prospects for those participating (and no doubt
some others besides).
Anything that is
internet-based will become increasingly vulnerable, and there are
definitely plans to shut down some/all of it, depending on the
Cyber Polygon makes that crystal clear.
'Taking Control by Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon as Part of
the Elite Coup'.
And unless a
currency is backed by something with genuine value - as currencies
were backed by gold or other metals in earlier eras - or there is
widespread confidence in a currency for another reason (as
currencies around the world have been backed by their governments
until now), it can become valueless very quickly.
Moreover, the big
banks are heavily invested in cryptocurrencies:
Another reason to be
'3 Banks That Have Big Plans for Blockchain and Cryptocurrency'.
But for an
extremely succinct warning against crypto, check out this brief
statement from Catherine Austin Fitts:
'If you move to crypto, and I just
want to really underscore this, crypto is not a currency, it is a
'The Dangers Of Cryptocurrencies'.
And, perhaps, the
recent bankruptcy of the FTX Group is worth considering.
'"This Is Unprecedented" - Enron Liquidator Overseeing FTX Bankruptcy
Speechless - "I Have Never Seen Anything Like This".'
For another of the
many critiques of crypto, see retired corporate accountant Lawrence
'The Dangers of Cryptocurrencies'.
Crypto has a high
environmental cost too, given the technology it uses and the energy
it needs to run.
not part of the future we must work together to build.
The Rothschilds and
this investigation, it is worth returning to consideration of the
Rothschild family in relation to one final issue:
Why is this
investigation, I have endeavoured to document a few basic facts:
Global Elite is intent on reshaping world order by killing off a
substantial proportion of the human population and enslaving those
left alive as transhuman slaves imprisoned in 'smart' cities.
part of achieving this outcome, the global economy is being
ransacked and destroyed:
This is intended to deprive people of the
sustenance necessary to resist the entire Elite program that, among
other outcomes, will concentrate virtually all remaining wealth in
This program has
been planned in detail by elite agents in organizations like the
World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization and is being
implemented by relevant international organizations and
multinational corporations (particularly those in the pharmaceutical
and biotechnology industries, and the corporate media), as well as
national governments and medical organizations.
But, as I have
pointed out, every organization, corporation and government is
composed of individual human beings who make decisions (consciously
or unconsciously) about what they do in any given circumstance.
while structural power is not something that can be ignored,
individuals do have agency.
To illustrate this
point, I have used the House of Rothschild as one example of a
family of individuals who make decisions about how to act in the
world and how the decisions of this family exercise enormous
influence over world events.
Consider another brief example of the
decisions made by Rothschild family members and what has transpired
as a result.
influence over world banking and the global economy, and thus
political systems, is heavily documented and illustrated above.
the current Elite push to substantially reduce the human
population and introduce a technocratic state populated by transhuman slaves, one question that inevitably suggests itself as
worthy of further investigation concerns the possible involvement of
the Rothschilds in the research and development of the technologies
and biotechnologies that make this all possible.
soon reveals that Nathaniel Mayer Victor Rothschild, the 3rd Baron
Rothschild, was born in 1910 and attended Trinity College,
Cambridge, where he read physiology, later gaining a PhD. After
working for MI5 during World War II,
'he joined the zoology
department at Cambridge University from 1950 to 1970.
He served as
chairman of the Agricultural Research Council from 1948 to 1958 and
as worldwide head of research at Royal Dutch/Shell [as noted above,
a family business] from 1963 to 1970.'
'Victor Rothschild, 3rd Baron Rothschild'.
however, articles in 'The Financial Times' in 1982-1983 reveal that
N.M. Rothschild, of which the biologist Lord Rothschild was head,
had established a venture capital fund called Biotechnology
Investments in 1981 to attract £25m investments for biotechnology
However, the fund, registered in the tax haven of
Guernsey, had such exacting scientific and financial standards that
it was having trouble identifying companies that could meet those
standards despite the rapidly growing field.
According to one news
report in 1982:
'City [of London] estimates put the number of new
technology companies established in the last five years at about
150, mostly in North America.
At least 70 are
'Newsclippings re. Biotechnology Investments Limited (BIL) owned by
N.M. Rothschild Asset Management'.
But lest you are
concerned that the Rothschilds failed to establish a firm foothold
in this fledgling industry, you might be reassured, but no wiser, to
read the entry on the CHSL Archives Repository (that focuses on
'Preserving and promoting the history of molecular biology') titled
Asset Management - Rothschild, Lord Victor'.
You will be no
wiser because the archive is marked 'Closed until Jan 2045 -
Suppress all images for 60 years'.
As it turns out,
however, the Rothschilds, whose business acumen is never questioned,
are still raising funds and investing heavily in biotechnology.
'Edmond de Rothschild private equity unit to invest in biotech'.
It's just that, as usual, while you are hearing from elite agents
(such as Klaus Schwab, Yuval Noah Harari and Elon Musk) who publicly
promote transhumanist endeavours, you are hearing very little from
those, like the Rothschilds, who prefer control and profit to
Rothschilds are playing a key role both in the ongoing ransacking of
the global economy and in profiting from the control they are
helping to make possible through introduction of transhumanist
It goes without saying that the family has heavy
investments in many other technologies too, including those that
will be critical to the success of the imminent technocratic world
order, such as the Internet of Things.
See, for example,
Of course, the
Rothschilds and other Elite families with whom they are
interconnected in various ways are also heavily involved through
investments in major asset management corporations such as Vanguard
But again, it is not just about wealth concentration;
it is about control and depopulation too.
So, for example,
Rockefellers, another family closely connected to the Rothschilds,
are also well-known for their longstanding involvement in social
engineering and eugenics.
So What Can We Do About This?
Because it controls
the political, economic, financial, technological, medical,
educational, media and other important levers of society, the Elite
profits hugely from daily human activity.
But it can also
precipitate an 'extreme event' (or the delusion of one) - a war,
financial crisis (including depression), revolution, 'natural
disaster', 'pandemic' (if you think that the Covid-19 scam was the
last of its kind, see
'Who's Driving the Pandemic Express?' and watch the plan for the
next one, already available:
...and use its control of the
political, economic, technological and other levers mentioned to
manage how events unfold while simultaneously managing the narrative
about what is taking place so that the truth is concealed.
This means that the
Elite's killing and exploitation of the human population at large is
hidden behind whatever 'enemy' (human or otherwise) that Elite
agents in government and the media direct the attention of the
public towards at any given time.
It doesn't matter
whether we all end up blaming Hitler, Saddam or 'the Russians', 'the
capitalists' or 'Wall Street', 'the government', 'the climate' or
'the virus', we never blame the Elite...!
So we never take action that
is focused on stopping those individuals and their corporations and
institutions that are fundamentally responsible for inflicting
unending harm on us all, as well as the Earth and all of its other
the Elite is adept at devising an ever-expanding range of tools that
can be used to manipulate events while simultaneously concealing
this behind a barrage of propaganda, there is still just enough time
to finally recognize what is happening and to end it.
just as in the board game 'Monopoly', where one player finally owns
everything and the other players have been forced out of the game,
the Elite will win the 'final battle' against humanity, capture all
wealth and reduce those humans and transhumans left alive to the
status of slaves.
'The Final Battle for Humanity: It is "Now or Never" in the Long War
Against Homo Sapiens'.
Does this sound
insane to you? Of course it is.
Do you think the Elite is insane? Of
course it is.
'The Global Elite is Insane Revisited' with further detail in
'Why Violence?' and
'Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and
But just because
someone is insane and their plan is insane, it doesn't mean they
Remember Adolf Hitler?
Idi Amin in Uganda?
Insane violence of unspeakable magnitude can succeed if
too many people either cannot perceive the insanity, are afraid of
it or simply believe it is too preposterous - 'It can't be true.' -
and do nothing about it.
Or, in the cases just mentioned, not until
it was too late to prevent vast killing.
So here is the
summary: Humanity faces the gravest threat in our history.
because our opponent - the Global Elite - is insane, we cannot rely
on reason or thoughtfulness alone to get us out of this mess:
cannot reason with insanity...
And because the Global Elite controls
international and national political processes, the global economy
and legal systems, efforts to seek redress through those channels
'The Elite Coup to Kill or Enslave Us:
Why Can't Governments, Legal Actions and Protests Stop Them?'
Hence, if we are
going to defeat this long-planned, complex and multifaceted threat,
we must defeat its foundational components, not delude ourselves
that we can defeat it one threat at a time or even by choosing those
threats we think are the worst and addressing those first.
This is because the
elite program, whatever its flaws and inconsistencies, as well as
its potential for technological failure at times, is deeply
integrated so we must direct our efforts at preventing or halting
those foundational components of it that make everything else
This is why random acts of resistance will achieve
Effective resistance requires the focused exercise of our
power. In simple terms, we must be 'strategic'.
If you are
interested in being strategic in your resistance to the 'Great
Reset' and its related agendas, you are welcome to participate in
the 'We Are Human, We Are
Free' campaign which identifies a list of 30 strategic goals for
In addition and
more simply, you can download the one-page flyer that identifies a
short series of crucial nonviolent actions that anyone can take.
This flyer, recently updated and now available in 23 languages
(Chinese, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French,
German, Greek, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Malay, Polish,
Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Spanish, Slovak and Turkish)
with several more languages in the pipeline, can be downloaded from
strategic resistance to the 'Great Reset' (and
related agendas) appeals to you, consider joining the
'We Are Human, We Are
Free' Telegram group (with a link accessible from the website).
And if you want to
organize a mass mobilization, such as a rally, at least make sure
that one or more of any team of organizers and/or speakers is
responsible for inviting people to participate in this campaign and
that some people at the event are designated to hand out the
one-page flyer about the campaign.
If you like, you
can also watch, share and/or organize to show, a short video about
the campaign here:
'We Are Human, We Are Free'
In parallel with
our resistance, we must create the political, economic and social
structures that serve our needs, not those of the Elite.
That is why
long-standing efforts to encourage and support people to,
participate in local trading schemes (involving the
exchange of knowledge, skills, services and products with or without
a local medium of exchange)
develop structures for cooperation,
governance, nonviolent defence and networking with other communities,
...are so important.
Of course, indigenous peoples still have many of
these capacities - lost to vast numbers of humans as civilization
has expanded over the past five millennia - but many people are now
engaged in renewed efforts to create local communities, such as ecovillages, and local trading schemes, such as
Obviously, we must initiate/expand these forms of
individual and community engagement in city neighbourhoods too.
Catherine Austin Fitts reminds us, if we choose that option, there
is nothing to stop us having our own decentralised money system,
starting with our own local community central bank and our own local
'We Need to Talk about Mr Global - Part Two'.
Finally, as noted
by Professor Carroll Quigley in the very last words of his
nearly-1,000 page epic Tragedy & Hope:
'Some things we
clearly do not yet know, including the most important of all,
which is how to bring up children to form them into mature,
Tragedy & Hope: A History of the World in Our Time,
passage of time since Quigley wrote these words has revealed an
answer to this challenge.
So, if you want to raise children who are
powerfully able to investigate, analyze and act, you are welcome to
'My Promise to Children'.
Since the dawn of
human civilization 5,000 years ago, in one context after another,
some people who are more terrified than others in their immediate
vicinity have sought what they perceived to be increased personal
'security' by gaining and exercising greater control over the people
and resources around them.
time, this serious psychological dysfunctionality has been
compounding until, today, the degree of 'security' and control that
some people require includes all of us and all of the world's
For want of a better term, we might call them the 'Global
Elite' but it is important to understand that they are insane,
criminal and ruthlessly violent.
This takeover of
all of us and everything on Planet Earth is currently being
attempted by this Elite through the 'Great Reset' and its related
fourth industrial revolution, eugenicist and transhumanist agendas.
In essence, the
intention is to kill off a substantial proportion of us, as is now
happening, enclose the Commons forever (and force those who live in
regional areas off the land) while imprisoning those left alive as transhuman slaves in their technocratic 'smart cities' where we will
'own nothing' but provide the compliant workforce necessary to serve
Whether wars or
financial crises (including depressions), 'natural disasters',
revolutions or 'pandemics', great events are contrived by the Elite
to distract attention from and facilitate profound changes in world
order and obscure vast transfers of wealth from ordinary people to
And this is done
with the active complicity of Elite agents - including international
organizations such as
the United Nations, national governments and
legal systems - which is why redress cannot be found through
mainstream political or legal channels.
by an endless stream of irrelevant 'news', superficial debates such
as capitalism vs. socialism, monarchy vs. democracy,
party vs. that political party, or even which football team is
all people are oblivious to how the world really
works and who is orchestrating how history will be written by elite
Is there conflict
between individuals, families and groups within the Elite? Of
But unlike the conflicts they endlessly throw in our faces
to distract and manipulate us, the unifying agenda to which they all
subscribe is to perpetually restructure world order to expand Elite
control and extract more wealth for Elites...
5,000 years of human
history categorically demonstrates that point...!
Hence, if humanity
is to defeat this Elite program, we must do it ourselves.
And if you want
your resistance to this carefully-planned Elite technocratic
takeover to be effective, then it must be strategic.
death or technocratic enslavement is now imminent...