|
by James Corbett
July 28, 2024
from
TheCorbettReport Website
Earlier this year I wrote about "The Globalist's SECRET Message!"
If you read that editorial, you'll know the "secret" message turns
out to be remarkably open and shockingly frank:
"There are too many useless eaters out there
and it's time to get rid of them...!"
(SPOILER: You are, in the globalists' estimation,
just such a "useless eater.")
So, we already know about the technocrats' plan
for global depopulation.
Now,
how about their political action plan?
How is it that these enemies of humanity propose to organize the
polities of the world as they send us to the slaughter pen?
Why, as it turns out, that plan isn't much of a secret, either!
In
fact, its creators have written and talked about it extensively and
out in the open.
Want to hear about it?
Let's take a look...
Cecil Rhodes
If you watched
The WWI Conspiracy,
you'll know Cecil Rhodes isn't just the
Rothschild-financed mining monopolist who helped
foment the
Boer War (though he certainly is that!).
You'll also know that Rhodes started a secret
society modeled on the Jesuits for the purpose of forming a one
world government to be ruled over by "the English-speaking races."
What an awful thought it is that if we had
not lost America, or if even now we could arrange with the
present members of the United States Assembly and our House of
Commons, the peace of the world is secured for all eternity!
We could hold your
federal parliament
five years at Washington and five at London.
The only thing feasible to carry this idea
out is a secret one (society) gradually absorbing the wealth of
the world to be devoted to such an object.
SOURCE:
The Last Will and Testament of Cecil John Rhodes
(1902)
Yes, not only did one of the world's richest men
form a secret society to forge a world government, but this scheme
was even reported in the pages of
The New York Times (years after its inception, naturally...).
That such a "secret" scheme for global government
may be so publicly documented and yet still completely
unknown to the vast majority of the public is surprising only if you
don't know about the many, many similar admissions that the
globalists have printed in black and white for all the world to see.
We remember him as "that sci-fi writer" who wrote
War of the Worlds.
But his cronies in the globalist jet set
are more apt to remember H.G. Wells for his political writings.
That's right, from
The
Open Conspiracy to The
New World Order, Wells was a prolific author of
proto-technocratic global government-promoting drivel...
In fact, he even
contributed to the draft of
the United Nations' 1948 Declaration of Human Rights - you know,
the
document that mouths a bunch of feel-good platitudes about all
the wonderful rights and freedoms that the UN believes in... that
is, until you get to Article 29 and discover those rights and
freedoms only apply if you support the "purposes and principles" of
the United Nations.
Yeah, that Declaration of Human Rights...
What did H.G. Wells have to say about how the
technocratic super-state will come about?
So long as there is peace the class of
capable men may be mitigated and gagged and controlled, and the
ostensible present order may flourish still in the hands of that
other class of men which deals with the appearances of things.
But as some supersaturated solution will
crystallize out with the mere shaking of its beaker, so must
the new order of men come into visibly organized
existence through the concussions of war.
The charlatans can escape everything except
war, but to the cant and violence of nationality, to the
sustaining force of international hostility, they are ruthlessly
compelled to cling, and what is now their chief support must
become at last their destruction.
And so it is I infer that, whether violently
as a revolution or quietly and slowly, this grey confusion that
is Democracy must pass away inevitably by its
own inherent conditions, as the twilight passes, as the
embryonic confusion of the cocoon creature passes,
into
the higher stage, into the higher organism, the world-state of
the coming years.
SOURCE:
Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific
Progress upon Human Life and Thought
by H. G. Wells (1902)
A global government coming about as a result of a
cataclysmic war or other revolutionary process...?
Sounds about right...
And how will this all-controlling world
government - which he goes on to dub the "New Republic" - deal
with the "inferior races"?
What will it do with the Jews, the "dark
Welsh," the "Scotch" and all the "brown, and dirty-white, and
yellow people" who, in Wells' estimation, "do not come into the
new needs of efficiency" required by this technocratic superstate?
Well, the world is a world, not a charitable
institution, and I take it they will have to go. The whole tenor
and meaning of the world, as I see it, is that they have to go.
So far as they fail to develop sane,
vigorous, and distinctive personalities for the great world of
the future, it is their portion to
die out and disappear...
In other words,
Wells' heralded global government
will measure out each citizen's merits and demerits and decide if he
is worthy of life.
If deemed "life unworthy of life" by the
world
technocrats, that citizen dies.
History knows him as the CIA agent whose wife was
sleeping with JFK.
Corbett Report members
know him as the man whom E. Howard Hunt fingered as one of the
key figures in the
JFK assassination.
In 1948, the reading public knew him as the
president of United World Federalists, Inc. - or, as Life
magazine
memorably dubbed him, "the master salesman for world
government."
Yes, back in the 1940s it was OK to wear your
globalism on your sleeve, and the United World Federalists did
exactly that.
These "world federalists" (aka globalists) openly
promoted an agenda that included,
"world federal government, United Nations
reform, legislative resolutions, and amendments to the U.S.
Constitution to favor world federal government. "
Just as the organization wasn't shy about
advertising itself, so was its president not shy about announcing
his own intentions. In his 1947 book,
Peace or Anarchy ("Why not both?" I parenthetically
inquire), Meyer outlined his belief that world government was the
necessary solution to the "problem" of the anarchy between nations.
He argued:
The institution that is ultimately
responsible for two world wars within a generation and the
growing danger of a third is the sovereign nation-state.
Within the territories of the nation-states,
the necessity for the institutions of government has long been
recognized.
The national boundaries define separate legal
orders, and the citizens of each must find satisfaction for
their injuries and protection of their rights peacefully through
the laws, courts and police of their respective governments.
The relation between those living inside the
borders of a nation is that of mutual subjection to
coercive law.
But between the nations there is no
recognition of the need for enforceable law
through which to settle disputes peaceably.
SOURCE:
Peace or Anarchy by Cord Meyer, Jr.
Elsewhere in the book, Meyer reveals the true
driving animus of the globalists:
the creation of a singular seat of
power that will be able to sit in judgment of any individual nation
state.
"One ring to rule them all," as it were.
But in his 1980 autobiography,
Facing Reality - From World Federalism to the CIA, Meyer
reveals that he gave up on the world federalism idea because those
dastardly Soviets insisted - for some unfathomable reason
or other - that it was a ploy for America to assert its hegemony
over the rest of the world.
Having had his dream crushed, he fell into the
arms of the CIA, where he spent his time
running
Operation Mockingbird and whacking the US president in
broad daylight.
Returning to that 1948 Life magazine
profile, it noted that,
"[i]f world government is not achieved by
1951, Meyer is facetiously considering a plan to take his wife
and two sons to Africa and start life anew among the Pygmies."
For those who are wondering: he did not, in fact,
start life anew among the Pygmies as promised.
Let's see what
the banksters have to say about
world government, shall we?
If you've seen
Century of
Enslavement - The History of The Federal Reserve, then you'll
recall that one of the key architects of the Jekyll Island
conspiracy that gave birth to the Federal Reserve was Paul Warburg,
heir to the Warburg banking dynasty and son-in-law of Solomon Loeb
of the famed New York investment firm, Kuhn, Loeb & Company.
Warburg's son, James Warburg, filled his father's
shoes by becoming an influential banker in his own right.
In the 1930s and 1940s he served as president at
the International Manhattan Company, president of the International
Acceptance Bank and Vice Chairman of the Board at Bank of the
Manhattan Company.
He also served as a financial advisor to
President Franklin D. Roosevelt; became a deputy director in the
Office of War Information, the propaganda arm of the US government
during World War II; and was a prominent member of the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR).
When James Warburg appeared before the United
States Senate Subcommittee on Revision of the United Nations Charter
in 1950 as "an individual," then, the members of that subcommittee
well knew he was in fact speaking for the banksters.
The subcommittee, it turns out, was
investigating the handiwork of Cord Meyer and his world
federalist cohorts:
a flurry of Congressional resolutions
designed to streamline the United Nations and make it into a
more streamlined vehicle for world government.
And what did Warburg tell them?
The past 15 years of my life have been
devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world
peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to
these problems.
These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the
conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or
not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can
be achieved by peaceful means.
We shall have
world government,
whether or not we like it.
The question is only whether world
government will be achieved by consent or by conquest...
SOURCE:
James Warburg before the Subcommittee on Revision of the United
Nations Charter
And, lest there be any confusion about what
Warburg meant by these remarks:
I think the essential thing
we should undertake is that we declare our willingness
to participate in some sort of world organization
capable of enacting, administering, interpreting, and,
enforcing world law, whether you call it a federation,
a government, or world order, I don't think
that matters.
That a prominent banker would support world
government will not be surprising to anyone who has studied the
history of banking.
The banksters have long been taking control of
governments around the world, so it makes sense that the capstone on
their pyramid of financial power would be a global government that
they could control in a similar manner.
That a banker like Warburg would be so open
about his intentions is surprising only to those who think that the
push toward world government is some sort of covert conspiracy.
Remember
Paul Ehrlich?
You know, the lying Malthusian fearmonger
whose every prediction about overpopulation causing the
impending collapse of civilization has been proven completely
wrong time and time again?
Well, to the surprise of no one, Ehrlich also
believes in the necessity of world government.
He insists that only
some sort of super-national "planetary regime" that can protect us
from the ravages of overpopulation.
And how, exactly, could world government
save us from his made-up overpopulation bogeyman?
Erhlich spelled it out in black and white in his
1977 book,
Ecoscience, coauthored by his wife, Anne, and future Obama
"science czar" John Holdren.
Should a Law of the Sea be successfully
established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the
Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate
change, and to control atmospheric pollution.
Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP
and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be
developed into a
Planetary Regime - sort of an
international superagency for population, resources, and
environment.
Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could
control the development, administration, conservation,
and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or
nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications
exist.
Thus the Regime could have the power to
control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but
also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross
international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans.
The Regime might also be a logical central
agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including
assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the
international market.
The Planetary Regime might be given
responsibility for determining the optimum population for the
world and for each region and for arbitrating various
countries' shares within their regional limits.
Control of population size might remain the
responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have
some power to enforce the agreed limits.
SOURCE:
Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment
by Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, John P. Holdren
In other words,
a world government would have responsibility
for deciding the "optimum population" of the planet.
And, in order to ensure that optimum population,
anything, up to and including forced abortions and forced
sterilization, is permissible.
We already know that Ehrlich is a reprehensible
scientific charlatan, motivated by Malthusian scare stories and a
psychopathic hatred of humanity.
The above-quoted passage merely confirms that
these traits are common to globalists as well.
Where were you on September 11th...?
No, not September 11, 2001... September 11,
1990...
George H. W. Bush may be one of the only
Americans of his generation who
can't remember where he was when JFK was shot, but he likely
never forgot where he was on September 11, 1990:
pledging his fealty to the globalist gang in
front of the US Congress (and the world).
That's right, 11 years to the day before 9/11,
Poppy Bush was delivering an address before a joint session of
Congress as his administration was gearing up to launch the first
Gulf War.
It was that speech that contained the
words that we conspiracy hands know so well.
We stand today at a unique and extraordinary
moment.
The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as
it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic
period of cooperation.
Out of these troubled times, our fifth
objective - a
New World Order - can emerge... a
new era - freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the
pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace.
An era in which the nations of the world,
East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.
A hundred generations have searched for this
elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the
span of human endeavor.
Today that new world is struggling to be
born, a world quite different from the one we've known.
A world where the rule of law
supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which
nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and
justice.
A world where the strong respect the rights
of the weak
SOURCE:
September 11, 1990: Address Before a Joint Session of Congress
Here in 2024, we all know what actually
resulted from those valiant-sounding words:
...and, eventually, Gulf War II, which was
directed by
Bush's son and led to the death of a
further million Iraqis.
Now, what was that again about "prosper and live
in harmony"...?
In 2003, people with their head screwed on
straight were
warning
that
the banksters and their government minions were setting the
global economy up for a catastrophic panic by artificially inflating
a housing bubble.
In 2006, people with their head not screwed on
straight were
making fun
of these (totally correct) prognosticators.
In 2007, the bubble
popped as they predicted.
And in 2008, failed Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations and other exotic financial instruments predicated on the
housing failed bubble began eating their way through the economy,
threatening the very financial system itself.
The
Global Financial Collapse was on...!
In 2009, Gordon Brown, then-Prime Minister of the
UK, stepped up to the podium at the G20 London Summit, where the top
globalist brass had gathered to determine,
how they could best use
this crisis to achieve their goal of global government...
Gordon Brown told them exactly what they wanted
to hear:
This is the day that the world came together
to fight back against the global recession not with words but
with a plan for global recovery and for reform and with a clear
timetable for its delivery.
And our message today is clear and certain... we believe that in this new global age our prosperity is
indivisible.
We believe that
global problems
require global solutions. [...] I think a
New
World Order is emerging and with it the foundations of
a new and progressive era of international cooperation.
We have resolved that from today we will
together manage the
process of globalization to
secure responsibility from all and fairness to all, and we've
agreed that in doing so we will build a more sustainable and
more open and a fairer global society.
SOURCE: Press Conference
Gordon Brown
pt 1
/ pt 2
Brown's message of using the global crisis to
bring about global government struck a chord with his fellow
globalists.
It was
echoed by
the Vatican:
"The establishment of a
global
political Authority cannot be achieved without an
already functioning multilateralism, not only
on a diplomatic level, but also and above all in relation to
programs for sustainable development and peace.
It is not possible to arrive at
global Government without giving political expression to
pre-existing forms of interdependence and cooperation."
It was boosted by the
City of London's mouthpiece:
"So, it seems, everything is in place.
For the first time since homo sapiens
began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an
opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world
government."
And it was latched on to by the "multipolar world
order" advocates like the head of the Bank of China, who
used the crisis as an opportunity to promote a
new, IMF-administered
international reserve currency.
But this was not the first time that Brown had
suggested a "New
World Order to save [the] earth."
Back in the spring of 2008, before the Global
Financial Crisis had even kicked off, Brown was already delivering a
remarkably similar message in his Kennedy Memorial Lecture,
delivered at the Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum on April
18, 2008.
And if in the eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries nation states looked to the concept of the balance of
power for their security, and in the latter half of the
twentieth briefly put their faith in the concept of mutually
assured destruction.
We, amid the emerging complexities of the
twenty-first century, must recognize afresh the power of John
Kennedy's Declaration of Interdependence and must firmly root
our international system in the values we hold in common,
shaping more than a new world order, creating instead a
truly global society.
A global society no longer just based on the
power of states delineated by borders but on the aspirations of
people that transcend borders."
SOURCE:
The Change We Choose: Speeches 2007-2009
by Gordon Brown
Oh, and you'll never guess what Gordon
Brown's solution to the
coronavirus scamdemic crisis was!...
Unless you guessed that it was a call for the
creation of global government, in which case you're totally right.
Gordon Brown has urged world leaders to
create a temporary form of global government to
tackle the twin medical and economic crises caused by the
Covid-19 'pandemic'.
The former Labour prime minister, who was at
the centre of the international efforts to tackle the impact of
the near-meltdown of the banks in 2008, said there was a need
for a taskforce involving world leaders, health experts and the
heads of the international
organizations that would have
executive powers to coordinate the response. [...]
"This is not something that can be dealt
with in one country," he said.
"There has to be a
coordinated
global response."
SOURCE:
Gordon Brown calls for global government to tackle coronavirus
Yes, as Gordon Brown effectively demonstrates
time and again, to the committed globalist, every crisis that comes
along - real or fake, act of God or artificially generated - is just
a nail begging for a strong world government to hammer it down.
I could go on. And on and on and on...
I haven't even mentioned the modern-day
proponents of global governance - the "multipolar world order"
advocates including not just
President-for-Life Xi in China and
President-for-Life Putin in Russia but also their
counterparts in the Council on Foreign Relations and the other
centers of globalist power.
But you get the point by now, don't you...?
The quest to bring about world government
isn't a hidden conspiracy. It's a perfectly open one...!
So, let's recap the main points that the global
government conspirators are happy to put down in black and white:
-
they have created
secret societies and
organizations for the purpose of forwarding their dream of
world government
-
they are happy to latch on to any global
crisis as an excuse to bring about their global government
-
they want us to know we're getting a
global government whether we want it or not
-
they will use the global government to
institute a system of "world order" (presided over by them,
of course...)
-
this world government will eventually
be given the power of life or death over each "global
citizen"
Oh, and let's not forget,
these globalists are by
and large the same people who keep harping on about the need to
cull
the population by getting rid of the "useless eaters" (i.e., you,
me, and everyone we know.)
Any questions...?
|
