by Dr. Joseph Mercola
March 30,
2022
from
Mercola Website
Story at-a-glance
-
The
globalist cabal wants to monopolize health systems
worldwide, and a stealth attack is already underway in
the form of an international pandemic treaty, proposed
by the World Health Organization
-
The
treaty is a direct threat to a nation's sovereignty to
make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would
erode democracy everywhere. Not only would the treaty
empower the WHO to mandate COVID jabs and vaccine
passports globally, it could potentially also expand the
WHO's power to dictate all health care policy worldwide
-
The
treaty would also give the WHO the power to censor
health information worldwide. This would be disastrous,
as the WHO has a long history of corruption and health
policy failures that are intrinsically linked to
conflicts of interest
-
When
people are harmed by the WHO's health policies, there's
no accountability because the WHO has diplomatic
immunity
-
Bill
Gates, the second largest funder of the WHO, has also
been funding pandemic exercises, including Event 201 and
the Nuclear Threat Initiative's exercise on
international response to deliberate biological events.
This scenario involved a deliberate release of a
genetically engineered bioweapon - a pneumonic plague -
for which there is no available treatment. Both
exercises were held in 2019
The globalist cabal wants to monopolize health systems worldwide,
and a stealth attack is already underway in the form of an
international pandemic treaty. 1
The negotiations for this
treaty began March 3, 2022. 2
As reported by The Pulse
(video below):
"Coming off the back
of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) is
proposing a new pandemic treaty they're hoping will be accepted
by enough member countries to become a reality by 2024."
According to
Director-General
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, "me-first"
approaches "stymie the global solidarity needed" to address global
threats.
His solution?
Give the
WHO all the power...!
The pandemic treaty
is a direct threat to a nation's sovereignty
to
make decisions for itself and its citizens,
and would erode
democracy everywhere...
Over the past two years, in the name of keeping everyone "safe" from
infection, the globalists have justified unprecedented attacks on
Now, the WHO wants to
make its pandemic leadership permanent, and to extend it into the
health care systems of every nation.
Treaty
Threatens National Sovereignty
As noted by The Pulse,
"there are a number
of things in the treaty that the people of the world need to
consider before going down this path."
In the featured video,
The Pulse's Joe Martino interviews
Shabnam Palesa Mohamed,
a member of the
steering committee of the
World Council for Health,
who points out that the treaty gives the WHO:
"...an inordinate
amount of power to make decisions in sovereign countries as to
how people live and how they deal with pandemics, from lockdowns
to mandates over treatment."
In short, it would create
a one-size-fits-all approach to disease, without regard for all the
varying situations found in individual countries, and this is
something we already know doesn't work.
The treaty is a direct
threat to a nation's sovereignty to make decisions for itself and
its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.
At the same time, it would cost each member country millions of
dollars to participate in this process.
As explained by Mohamed,
the
treaty will need to go through a voting process at the World Health
Assembly in 2023.
They need a majority for
it to pass and, if passed, all member countries will be bound by it.
The Treaty Is
'Invalid and Unlawful'
Another concern raised by Mohamed is that many countries don't even
know about this treaty as of yet, and it's possible that the WHO
might try to push for earlier implementation than 2024 - all
without
public participation or input.
"It is undemocratic,
it is unconstitutional and therefore it makes the treaty invalid
and unlawful," she says.
She also highlights the
WHO's history of corruption and many health policy failures, which
are,
"intrinsically linked
to conflicts of interest."
In an open letter on the
WHO's pandemic treaty, the World Council for Health writes, in
part: 3
"The proposed WHO
agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and
inalienable rights.
It increases the
WHO's suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose
dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and
ineffective treatments against the will of the people.
The WCH (World Council for Health) believes that the people have
a right to participate in any agreement that affects their
lives, livelihoods, and well-being.
However, the WHO has not engaged in a process of public
participation, which is evidence that,
its priority is capturing
more power for itself and its corporate accomplices, than
serving the interests of the people...
Without an unbiased
democratic process, any agreement by the WHO, acting via
the
United Nations, will be unlawful, illegitimate, and invalid.
Historically, the WHO leadership has failed the people.
Among
many examples,
it approved the
injurious H1N1 (swine flu)
vaccine for a controversially declared pandemic...
Equally, the WHO failed during the COVID-19 chapter as it
encouraged lockdowns, suppressed early preventive treatments,
and recommended product interventions that have proven to be
neither safe nor effective.
The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world's health agenda,
nor enforce bio-surveillance.
While it receives
funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is
caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also
receives substantial funding from private interests that use
their contributions to influence and profit from WHO decisions
and mandates.
For example, the
Gates Foundation and the Gates-funded GAVI
vaccine promotion alliance, contribute over $1 billion a year."
Another concern is the
fact that when people are harmed by the WHO's health policies,
there's no accountability because the WHO has diplomatic immunity...
According to Mohamed,
"the WHO should
not
be making ANY decisions about world health in the future."
The Ultimate
Power Grab
As noted by Martino, while the treaty claims to be focused on
pandemic planning and responses, there's serious concern that it
could be expanded to cover other areas of health as well.
Mohamed agrees, saying
that it could potentially be expanded, using the WHO's constitution
as the basis for that expansion.
Article 2 of the WHO's
constitution states:
"In order to achieve
its objective, the functions of the Organization shall be:
a) to act as the
directing and coordinating authority on international health
work
... k) to propose
conventions, agreements and regulations, and make
recommendations with respect to international health
matters...
... s) to establish and revise as necessary international
nomenclatures of diseases, of causes of death and of public
health practices
... v) generally
to take all necessary action to attain the objective of the
Organization."
Its power is already very
significant, and the goal to turn the WHO into a global health
dictatorship is virtually written into its constitution.
Also, remember that the
WHO removed the specificity of mass casualties from the definition
of a pandemic, so now,
a pandemic can be just about
any disease that
occurs in multiple countries...
Even obesity could
theoretically qualify.
So, the WHO could claim
power over health care systems in any number of ways, given the
chance.
Treaty Would
Grant WHO Power to Mandate Vaccine Passports
While most of the world is more than ready to move on, the WHO seems
unwilling to let go.
A WHO official recently
told the Ottawa Citizen that the COVID pandemic is still "far from
over." 4
The reason for this reluctance to declare the pandemic over is
likely because the WHO hopes to gain the power to mandate vaccine
passports and COVID jabs worldwide.
It's already working on the
creation of a global vaccine passport/digital identity program.
As
reported by WEBLYF: 5
"Under the guise of a
'trust network,' another initiative called Vaccination
Credential Initiative (VCI) is also gaining momentum.
Partnering with big tech companies, big corporations, and big
universities, VCI describes itself as,
'a voluntary coalition of
public and private organizations committed to empowering
individuals with access to verifiable clinical information
including a trustworthy and verifiable copy of their vaccination
records in digital or paper form using open, interoperable
standards.'
VCI's SMART Health Cards, as reported by
Off-Guardian, are
already implemented by,
'25 states in
America, plus Puerto Rico and DC, and have become the US's
de-facto national passport.'
As explained in the
article:
'The US
government, unlike many European countries, has not issued
their own official vaccine passport, knowing such a move
would rankle with the more Libertarian-leaning US public,
not to mention get tangled in the question of state vs.
federal law.
The SMART cards allow them to sidestep this issue.
They are
technically only implemented by each state individually via
agreements with VCI, which is technically a private entity.
However, since
the SMART cards are indirectly funded by the US government,
their implementation across every state makes them a
national standard in all but name'."
United Tribes
of New Zealand Denounce the WHO Treaty
As noted by NZDSOS, 6
"Is this the way we
want to live our lives?
Constantly at the behest of shadowy
individuals and corporations who monitor our every move and
determine what we can and can't do, down to buying food?"
In a formal letter of
notification to the WHO and the Executive Board of the World Health
Assembly, the
government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni in New Zealand
strongly denounced this and any other treaty that challenges
national sovereignty: 7
"... you are thereby
formally notified that the Wakaminenga Māorigovernment of
Aotearoa Nu Tireni/New Zealand does not consent in any shape of
form to any type of international pandemic treaty under the WHO
or its assembly.
Any such construct
shall be void ab initio.
We, as United Tribes and Hereditary Chiefs, represent the
only current legitimate government in New Zealand.
The current NZ
government represented by
Jacinda Ardern is an illegitimate
government because it is a corporation (SEC CIK #0000216105)
listed on the US Security & Exchange Commission as Her Majesty
the Queen in Right of New Zealand. 8,9
In accordance with the
Clearfield Trust Doctrine, a corporation
does not have any implied right to govern a sovereign people. We
hereby register our vote of no confidence in the actions or
authority of the corporation unlawfully posing as a government
in our territory.
This unlawful Ardern government and its ministers stand charged
by the Nga Tikanga Māori Law Society and the Wakaminenga Maori
Government of Nu Tireni with genocide, war crimes, and
crimes
against humanity related to their willful disregard for the
suffering and loss of life resulting from their unlawful
response to the
engineered bioweapon known as COVID-19 and the
unlawful
forced administration of a poison to our people and
forced medical experimentation.
Also charged with serious crimes related to a pandemic response,
the WHO and Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have no standing or
authority to form any binding agreement related to a pandemic
response, in any jurisdiction and we command that these attempts
shall cease and desist immediately pending the outcome of these
charges under Rome statutes 6, 7 and 8, filed in the
international Criminal Court 6 December 2021...
You are hereby directed to cease and desist discussions or
negotiations with the unlawful Arden Government, a NZ
Corporation, known as Her Majesty Queen in Right of New Zealand.
The Wakaminenga Maori
Government of Aotearoa Nu Tireni reserves the right to
discuss/negotiate with any international partner(s) of its
choice, including the World Council for Health (WCH)."
Treaty Would
Create Global Censorship of Health Information
The treaty would also give the WHO the power to,
censor health
information worldwide...
On the European Council's
web page discussing the pandemic treaty, under the headline
"Restoring Trust in the International Health System," it states:
10
"The agreement...
will set the foundation for better communication and information
to citizens.
Misinformation threatens public trust and risks
undermining public health responses.
To redeem citizen
trust, concrete measures should be foreseen to improve the flow
of reliable and accurate information as well as to tackle
misinformation globally."
In other words,
under
this treaty, we can expect even greater censorship than what we've
experienced so far...
Tech companies have
already proven where their allegiance lies, and it's not with the
public.
Google,
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and others have de-platformed
just about everyone who posts health information that runs counter
to what the WHO is saying, real-world data and verifiable facts be
damned.
Financial platforms have
also banned people for the same reason.
Now imagine there being a
binding international law that makes all that censorship mandatory.
Their Playbook
Was Revealed in 2019
Officially, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second
largest funder of the WHO, second only to the U.S. government, 11 but
the combined contributions from the Gates Foundation and GAVI made
Bill Gates,
the unofficial top sponsor of the WHO as of 2018...
12
Gates has also been funding pandemic exercises, including
Event
201, 13 held October 18, 2019, which gained notoriety for its
extraordinary accurate "predictions" of the COVID pandemic mere
months before it was declared.
Other co-sponsors
included the,
However, earlier that year, February 14, 2019, Gates also funded the
Nuclear Threat Initiative's (NTI) pandemic exercise for senior
global leaders on international response to deliberate biological
events, which took place in Munich, Germany. 14,15
NTI was founded to assess and reduce threats associated with the
proliferation of nuclear weapons, 16 but they've since expanded to
include biological threats. 17
Gates has also given
grants to the NTI for vaccine development in relation to biological
threats. 18
While Event 201 featured a fictional coronavirus outbreak, the NTI
exercise involved response to,
"deliberate, high
consequence biological events."
In other words,
a deliberate release
of a genetically engineered bioweapon - in this case a pneumonic
plague - for which there is no available treatment...
This exercise scenario
was the first of its kind. The video above features a summary of the
four-phase exercise.
Curiously, in mid-November 2019,
-
The Guardian
-
The New York
Times 19
-
The Washington Post
20,
...and others, reported that two
people in China had in fact been diagnosed with pneumonic plague.
21
In addition to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the NTI event
was sponsored by the
Wellcome Trust, the "philanthropic arm" of
GlaxoSmithKline and an investor in Vaccitech, which owns the patents
to AstraZeneca's COVID jab. 22
Both Gates and
Wellcome
are part of the
technocratic globalist network that is pushing
The
Great Reset forward.
Another sponsor was Georgetown University, 23 which also
curated the
World Economic Forum's library of COVID-19 treatments (primarily
focused on antivirals and COVID gene transfer injections). 24
Curation was done by three Georgetown University professors and
Rebecca Katz, director of the Georgetown Center for Global Health
Science and Security. 25
Katz is also listed as an
author on the NTI paper, 26 "A Spreading Plague - Lessons and
Recommendations for Responding to a Deliberate Biological Event,"
published June 2019, in which they review the conclusions reached
from that February 2019 exercise.
'A Spreading
Plague'
Together, these two pandemic exercises - both of which were
sponsored by Gates - form a playbook for how to set up a biological
attack and then hide the truth from the world so that you can not
only profit from it in the short term but also centralize power,
permanently transfer wealth and change the social and financial
order to your own liking in the process.
Not surprisingly, a number of Event 201 participants also partook in
the NTI's exercise, 27 and hold positions within technocratic
institutions like Wellcome, the WHO and the World Economic Forum.
Event 201, in particular, focused not on finding remedies and saving
lives, but how to control "misinformation":
A vast majority of that
exercise centered around the creation of effective propaganda and
censorship...
Similarly, "A Spreading
Plague" also includes the recommendation to enlist private companies
as "assets" to carry out the globalists bidding: 28
"In 2019 and 2020,
international organizations, including the WHO, UNODA (United
Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs), and the World Economic
Forum, should convene private sector companies to identify gaps
and concrete next steps to strengthen the capability of
companies to provide assets to assist with international
response for deliberate biological attacks and other
high-consequence biological events."
In the NTI scenario - in
which a fictional country called Carta is found to have engineered
and released a biological weapon into the neighboring country of
Vestia - we also see,
'curious parallels' to current-day
accusations by
Russia, which claims biological weapons research was being conducted
in the
Ukraine, necessitating defensive action...
All in all, the NTI tabletop exercise only adds to the evidence pile
that suggests,
the COVID pandemic was
premeditated and preplanned for
financial and geopolitical purposes.
It was a power grab...
The pandemic treaty with the WHO is precisely what the World
Economic Forum and its allies now need, as it will put the
technocratic cabal firmly in charge of the biosecurity of the whole
world, and empower them to implement the rest of The Great Reset
agenda.
You can learn more
about The Great Reset on the World Economic
Forum's website 29,30 and in
Klaus Schwab's book, "Covid-19 - The Great Reset" 31 (but you might want to review the overwhelmingly
negative
comments on Amazon first).
As noted in a July 21, 2020, World Economic Forum article, 32 the
economic devastation caused by COVID-19 pandemic shutdowns,
"has the potential to
hobble global prosperity for generations to come."
The answer, according to
the World Economic Forum, is for countries to make sure the economic
system is "built back better."
Make no mistake,
this catchy slogan is part and parcel of the
Great
Reset plan and cannot be separated from it, no matter how
'altruistic'
it may sound...
Part of the "building
back better" is to,
shift the financial system over to an all-digital
centrally controlled currency system that is tied to a vaccine
passport and/or digital identity system...
Together, they will form a
pervasive system of social control, as
desired behaviors can be incentivized and undesired ones discouraged
through loss of various "privileges," including access to your own
finances.
Digital currency can even
be programmed by the issuer so that it can only be used for certain
types of purchases or expenses.
While it's going to be very difficult to stop this runaway train
that is The Great Reset, part of our defense is to oppose and
prevent the
WHO's pandemic treaty from becoming reality, as we'll
lose our national sovereignty if it does...
Sources and References
1 Reuters
November 26, 2021
2, 10 European
Council, Treaty on Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness
3 World
Council for Health Open Letter March 2022
4 Ottawa
Citizen March 18, 2022
5 Weblyf
March 2022
6, 7 NZDSOS
March 18, 2022
8 US
Security & Exchange Commission as Her Majesty the Queen in
Right of New Zealand
9 SEC
CIK #0000216105
11 Swiss
Info May 10, 2021
12 The
Defender September 7, 2021
13 Center
for Health Security Event 201
14 NTI
February 14, 2019
15 NTI
June 13, 2019
16 NTI
Nuclear Threats
17 NTI
Biological Threats
18 Gates
Foundation National Threat Initiative
19 New
York Times November 13, 2019
20 Washington
Post November 13, 2019
21 The
Guardian November 13, 2019
22 The
Corbett Report February 24, 2021
23 Georgetown
University Tabletop Exercise on Int'l Response to Deliberate
Biological Events
24, 25 WEF
COVID-19 Treatments Curated by Georgetown University
26 A
Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding
to a Deliberate Biological Event June 2019
27 A
Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding
to a Deliberate Biological Event June 2019, List of
Participants Page 8
28 A
Spreading Plague: Lessons and Recommendations for Responding
to a Deliberate Biological Event June 2019, Page 17
29 WEF
The Great Reset
30 WEF
The Great Reset Highlights
31 Covid-19 - The Great Reset
32 World
Economic Forum July 21, 2020
|