by Dr. Joseph Mercola
June 12, 2022

from Mercola Website

Spanish version
 

 

 

 

 


STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • It's become absolutely crucial to understand what we're up against, globally, and who's responsible for the rising totalitarianism and their ultimate intention
     

  • The COVID 'pandemic' was a 'coup d'état' by the technocratic cabal that is behind the global takeover agenda, referred to as The Great Reset
     

  • The Great Reset was introduced by the World Economic Forum, which is tightly coupled to the United Nations and the World Health Organization. Their agenda is to implement a global type of totalitarianism based on technocratic and transhumanist ideologies. Part of that plan also includes reengineering and controlling all life forms, including humans
     

  • While the outward expression of technocracy will appear as totalitarianism, the 'control center' is not an individual. Rather than a single person ruling by the decree, technocracy relies on control through technology and algorithm. This is a very important difference. In short, there will be no individual to blame or hold accountable. The "dictator" is an algorithm
     

  • Technocracy is an invented and unnatural form of economics that expresses itself as totalitarianism and requires social engineering to work. Technocrats in the past defined technocracy as the science of social engineering. Controlling the populace is crucial for the system to function

 

 



Patrick Wood, a repeat guest, has spent decades studying technocracy - an invented economic system that the global cabal is currently trying to implement worldwide.

 

He was recently interviewed by The Defender, the Children's Health Defense newsletter.

 

You will find that interview below. I would actually encourage you to watch that one first, because it provides a really good background of Wood and his work.

This conversation also ties in with an interview I recently did with professor Mattias Desmet, author of "The Psychology of Totalitarianism," which will air in a few weeks, so be sure to keep an eye out for that one.

 

While technocracy and totalitarianism have many similarities, there are some differences in perspective, which we will unravel here.

"I wish there was something else to talk about, but this is it," Wood says.

 

"This is the topic of the day. This is what people need to know and understand.

If we are going to fight back against this enemy, which previously has pretty much been unseen, we must recognize who we're dealing with. Period...

 

We cannot provide any defense or offense to push back on this unless we know who the enemy really is and what they're thinking, what's in their head."

 



COVID Was Technocracy's Coup D'état

While the COVID crisis sent most into a state of confusion, Wood was not surprised by the chain of events that eventually took place.

 

He'd been following the climate change alarmism and the sustainable development agenda for a long time, and as soon as the same people who were promoting climate alarmism jumped on the COVID train,

he knew they were connected, and that COVID was going to be used to promote the technocratic agenda...

 

 


The same flawed computer models used to convince us climate change will kill us all were also used to incite panic about the lethality of COVID.

These computer models are basically rigged to say whatever they want them to say...

According to climate change alarmists,

mankind should have been wiped off the face of the earth 10 years ago...

Yet here we are...!

 

The COVID models also failed, missing the mark by miles.

"At the time [in early 2020], I said this is technocracy's coup d'état. They're finally making their major global move to do what they said they were going to do for a long time.

 

Now, they're actually putting shoe leather to it and they're making it happen, so I called it coup d'état early on," Wood says.

Unfortunately, to quote Wood's co-author of previous books, Anthony Sutton, only,

  • 2% of people have critical thinking skills

  • 8% of people think they can think

  • 90% would rather die than think...

This willful ignorance explains why only 10% of a given population, on average, does not fall into mass formation hypnosis.

Wood, along with Dr. Judy Mikovits and Dr. Reiner Füllmich, an international lawyer who cofounded the German Corona Investigative Committee - have formed the Crimes Against Humanity Task Force.

 

The first event will be held in Tampa, FL with guest speaker, Michael Yeadon, Ph.D.

"We believe there is a great case to be made that, indeed, crimes against humanity have been committed in the same context and sense that they were discovered at the Nuremberg trials that produced the Nuremberg Code, which is now embedded in the legal system in every nation on earth, [including] our country and every state as well.

Medical experimentation is verboten, period, and yet it has happened anyway, with no informed consent along the way. People are getting sick and dying, the same old drill.

 

What went wrong?

 

We're presenting this case to the American public in person, and I will say the dynamic of talking to a live audience today is a breath of fresh air for me, personally.

 

I think everybody else would say the same thing."


 


Creating a New Normal on Our Own Terms

While many resist this stance, I and Wood agree that the crisis is not over, and it's not going to right itself.

 

No. It'll get worse, and things will never go back to the way they were.

 

It's important to realize that we shouldn't want things to go back to the old normal, however.

 

Because,

the old normal is what precipitated the many crises we're currently facing...

We can fully expect that the partially failed vaccine passport will be replaced by digital identity, which will progress to a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

 

Most central banks in the world will be rolling out CBDCs within the next three to five years.

Digital identity and CBDCs are a disaster racing toward us like a freight train, and it'll be extremely difficult to get out of harms way.

 

The past two years will seem like a picnic compared to what's coming.

"If my hypothesis is true, January 2020 was the coup d'état that started this war in earnest, the hot war, if you will, versus the leading up to it.

 

Lots of bad stuff happened from 9/11 through 2020 that we could point to and say, it looks like somebody's orchestrating this, but it went into a hot war, literally, globally as well, in January 2020.

 

Revolutions never stop with one attack. That's obvious.

 

I'm sure it's self-evident."

 



By Their Words and Actions, You Can Know Them

So,

Who instigated this global revolution?

 

Who's pulling the strings?

 

Who's the real enemy?

It's not the populace. It's not even a specific nation.

It's a conglomerate of wealthy and influential people all over the world...

But they have a shared philosophy, ideology and agenda.

 

Wood explains:

"What's going on is called The Great Reset of the planet.

 

The Great Reset has become a catchphrase.

 

Most people don't have a clue what it means yet, but it's promoted by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which is tightly interlinked and coupled with the United Nations.

This elite group of people represent in mix all of the people that were originally in the Trilateral Commission back in the 1970s.

 

It's the same kinds of people, the same agenda to transform the world into their vision, the way they think things ought to be. These are the people that have orchestrated this whole thing and they're the ones that are pushing it right now.

It's easy to identify most of the people involved in this.

 

You can look at the Klaus Schwabs and the Bill Gateses [of the world], and the thousand companies that belong to the World Economic Forum. They all have CEOs, board members, et cetera, that are part of the World Economic Forum.

 

It's pretty easy to identify them today.

The idea of The Great Reset is complete transformation of society and individuals that live in this society. The World Economic Forum is boldly talking about both.

 

They talk about this technocratic takeover on one hand, to reform society, that is the structures of society, the institutions, but they also talk about the restructuring of humanity itself.

That is, the merging of technology with the human condition, with the flesh, the changing of genetic code, Humanity 2.0, H+ is another term is used.

 

This is mad scientist type of stuff.

The average guy on the street has never been exposed to this.

It's hard to get your head around how evil this whole thing is, and it's all uninvited.

 

Nobody asked for it, they just did it.

That's another thing that's really important to understand:

This didn't just come out of the blue or fall out of the sky from outer space.

 

This has been in the works for a very long time."

 



Agenda 21 Laid the Groundwork

In 1992, Agenda 21 was created.

That was the genesis of sustainable development.

 

That's where that doctrine was openly described.

The Agenda 21 and the Biodiversity Convention that took place at the same time was the agenda for 21st century.

As explained by Wood,

Agenda 21 was foundational in the sense that laid out all the events being rolled out and changes being implemented today.

 

It's just that no one was really paying attention to where things were headed, the ultimate implications of it all.

Of course, those who did see the writing on the wall were discredited as "crazy conspiracy theorists."

"There was a great book released in 1994 called 'The Earth Brokers' (by Pratap Chatterjee and Matthias Finger).

 

The two authors were scholars.

 

They were also the original environmental crowd.

 

They weren't on our side necessarily, but they went to the Agenda 21 conference in good faith, figuring there was going to be some negotiation to dial back the development that was messing with the Third World and try to get the planet back together.

They went hoping to turn some things around, and they came away from the Agenda 21 conference completely disillusioned... In that book, they criticized the Agenda 21 process.

 

They started out by saying something like this:

'We argue that USAID - the United Nations conference on economic development - has boosted precisely the type of industrial development that is destructive for the environment, the planet and its inhabitants.

We see how, as a result of USAID,

the rich would get richer, the poor poorer, while more and more of the planet is destroyed in the process.'

What can we say, but 'amen' to that.

 

Here we are today. It's exactly what's happened."

 



The Plan to Own and Control All Life

"The Earth Brokers" also reviewed what they learned from the Biodiversity Convention, which ran parallel with the Agenda 21 conference.

 

It had the same participants, just two different thought tracks brought together at the same conference.

"They wrote about the biodiversity convention, which has become incredibly important today to the United Nations.

 

They said the convention implicitly equates the diversity of life, that is animals and plants, to the diversity of genetic codes.

 

By doing so,

diversity becomes something modern science can manipulate...

It promotes biotechnology as being essential for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.

They redefined the term biodiversity, for one, but they also said the main stake raised by the biodiversity convention is the issue of ownership and control over biological diversity.

 

The major concern was protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries.

 

That was their assessment. To which, today, we can say, 'Bingo!'

 

That is exactly what happened back then, and this is exactly the expression today that we see of the genetic takeover of life on planet earth.

 

They've gotten the seeds, they've gotten the plants, they've gotten the animals."

Today, the technocrats are also moving in on the human genetic code.

 

Chief medical officer of Moderna, Tal Zaks, for example, has stated that Moderna, a developer of the mRNA COVID jab, is,

"hacking the software of life"...

He described the human genetic code as an operating system, and if you can change that operating system by introducing a new line of code, or by changing a line of code, you can change how the operating system functions.

Since 1992, legislation has been created to protect Big Pharma.

 

You could say the 1992 Agenda 21 was a pre-coup... They laid the groundwork back then to protect the pharmaceutical and emerging biotech industries they knew were coming.

 

And, today, the very genetic makeup of mankind is up for grabs.

 

 

 


Origins of Technocracy

Technocracy dates further back than the 90s, however.

 

Handwritten letters dating to the 1930s reveal some of the originators of the technocratic movement had gotten into an argument with the Hearst newspaper empire, and because of that, they forbade journalists to discuss them or the technocratic ideology.

 

Hence,

technocracy went underground and got sort of buried for a few decades...

Wood explains:

"What happened was, Howard Scott, one of the cofounders of Technocracy Inc., was also the leader of the group at Columbia University when it was housed there in 1932.

 

He had promoted himself as being a certified engineer and one of the intellectual guys that would fit in to Columbia University. He wasn't from Columbia, but he was heading the [technocratic] movement there.

It was discovered, while he was there, that he was a complete fraud. He had no engineering degree at all. He was just a blowhard.

 

He was a promoter - basically a con man - and Nicholas Murray Butler, the president of Columbia... flipped out, and drop-kicked Scott out of Columbia...

By the same token, Howard Scott was out working in the media like crazy, and he worked the Hearst empire to get articles about technocracy published all across the country.

When Randolph Hearst discovered, as Butler did, that he had been taken for a ride and that his media empire had been manipulated, he freaked out and sent out a telegram-type memo to every newspaper in the country, saying,

'If anybody ever mentions technocracy again, you're fired.'

Well, that took care of that.

 

History books have a 25-year lag, typically. Historians don't go back and analyze stuff from last year to write in history books. They go back 25 years and they look around and they read the newspaper articles and whatever, and try and figure out what happened.

 

That's how they write history.

Well, there's this huge hole on the technocracy movement because it just got dropped out. All of a sudden, there's no newspaper articles.

 

It's just like they disappeared into thin air.

 

The big, highly credentialed scientist and engineers at Columbia who were crowing about technocracy the year before, now, all of a sudden, would not dare mention the word."

Wood eventually discovered a major university archive at University of Edmonton in Alberta, where all of the leaders of the Canadian technocracy movement had combined their papers in the '90s.

The documents were placed in a warehouse where they sat for years on end, until a catalog of them was finally published on the internet. It was a real jackpot.

 

Wood and his wife drove to Edmonton and spent a week sifting through and copying materials.

 

After that, it wasn't very difficult to break down how the technocratic agenda had been moved forward and was being implemented.

 

 

 


Totalitarianism Versus Technocracy

While the outward expression of technocracy will appear as totalitarianism, the control center is not a dictator.

Rather than a single person ruling by the decree, technocracy relies on control through technology and algorithm.

 

This is a very important difference.

 

In short, there are no people behind the curtain pulling strings.

 

There's no individual to blame or hold accountable.

The "dictator" is an algorithm.

Looking at Google over the past couple of years, in particular, we can see this in action.

 

We can also see it in the censorship of social media, and in the social credit system in China.

"The so-called artificial intelligence boom has created the possibility of controlling people by algorithm, rather than by political dictate," Wood says.

 

"There has been a battle between technocrats and governments ever since technocracy started. Back in the day, they hated government. They wanted to get rid of government.

 

There is still that propensity today.

You see it at the World Economic Forum, you see it at United Nations. They want to dissolve the national governments of the world. Historically, fascism and communism have been instituted by national governments.

 

These entities are on the hit list for technocracy. We saw this, by the way, just recently. There was a conference in Dubai, called the World Government Summit 1 [March 29-30, 2022].

It was partly put on by the United Nations and there were a bunch of financial mucky mucks there.

 

There was one in particular, Pippa Malmgren - she's from America, but she's in Great Britain - and she does financial wealth management services for the ultra rich.

She talked about the destruction of the fiat currency system, and she said, when it happens, there's simply going to be a change-over.

 

All the fiat currencies are going to go, and there's going to be an implementation of digital currency.

But she also made point that the nation state structures of the world are declining rapidly now.

 

She saw, I guess, that the nation states are the target of destruction.

They must go..."

This has been in the works for some time.

 

Look at the European Union.

While Europe has country borders, the EU member states have virtually no power to do anything anymore...

 

They're subservient to the EU's wishes.

"That's why a lot of people in Europe call the EU a technocracy, they're a bunch of technocrat elites - they're unelected, they're unaccountable," Wood says.

Nobody can get to them and they're making decisions for everybody else.

So, while the nation states are still there in name, they've stripped of their sovereignty.

 

The World Health Organization is now also in the process of stripping nations of their sovereignty through the so-called 'pandemic' Treaty, which will grant the WHO unprecedented power and influence to govern behind the veil of "global biosecurity."

We also see the rule of technocracy in companies such as Google, which is meddling in the affairs of nations, oftentimes wielding more power over people than the state itself.

 

So, it's important to realize that the enemy is not a nation state...

Today's enemy cannot be compared to anything that nation states have produced in the past, such as fascism, communism or socialism. This is an altogether brand-new entity.

 

So, while technocracy feels like totalitarianism, today's totalitarianism is an outgrowth of technocracy, and cannot be compared to any previous totalitarian regime.

"If you look at it in the context of the takeover genetic material on earth, this is the dangerous payload that we face.

 

It's not just the governance part of it.

 

It's not just the scientific dictatorship part of it, where people now can be manipulated in doing things that don't want to do.

 

We're talking about the direct takeover of the human genome.

This is an incredible thing, because that means, potentially, that our genome of humanity could be changed," Wood warns.

 



Unintended Consequences Are Probable

Now, it's quite possible, and indeed probable, that the orchestrators of this technocratic takeover are in over their heads and will end up self-destructing.

 

They're playing a game that has never been played before, so there's no telling what unintended consequences might be initiated.

One such unintended consequence could be a world war, and if that happens, gene editing the human genome will become irrelevant, because the living standards of the whole world will be pushed back hundreds of years.

 

Wood comments:

"No question about it - World War III or a world war is going to be triggered.

 

It's not in the best interest, for instance, for the World Economic Forum to have a world war. But that doesn't mean it won't happen either.

 

So far, I think the Ukraine war is pretty orchestrated and scripted in many ways to the agenda of the World Economic Forum. But it doesn't mean it couldn't lose control and the thing just goes nuts.

If that happens, I don't know where I'd put that on the doomsday clock. I'm not really sure, but it is definitely a possible outcome. If it does happen, it will spoil everything for everyone for a very long period of time.

 

As the Bible says, it'll take seven years to go through the countryside and bury all the radioactive bones. That'd be very ugly.

It might not be [a nuclear war]. But it could be. They have the technology. I mean, just look what they can do by launching these 'pandemic's and these bioweapons...

 

Another thing that can happen - and again, we're talking about waves of attacks, things that could bring us down and bring about this Great Reset - is some type of a cyber attack.

This has been in the news a lot lately.

 

A cyber attack could be a false flag operation, but it doesn't really matter what it is, whether it is or isn't [a false flag], but some big thing, like taking down the power grid, or taking down JPMorgan-Chase and nobody can get their money out for a period of a week.

Something like that would, again, put the fear of God into everybody.

 

We'll be back to the fear and panic; we'll do whatever you say to get safety, et cetera. It will perpetuate the takeover, the coup that we're looking at.

 

These are two possibilities, near-term, that are very real.

 

We've got different scenarios right now, but we know where this group of technocrat actors are going.

We understand their mindset, their philosophy, if you will. I hate to even call it that, but what is in their head? There's no passion, there's no compassion, there's no love, there's no mercy, there's no grace, there's nothing like that.

 

It's a completely inhuman endeavor to capture mankind into a scientific dictatorship, the likes of which the world has never seen before."

 



Preparing Can Help Ease Your Anxiety

The Boy Scouts motto is "Be prepared," and that is what I would encourage everyone to strive for at this time.

 

Another motto to embrace would be,

"Hope for the best and prepare for the worst."

Prepare as best you can for any and every contingency.

If you can, get out of the big cities and big urban areas.

 

Rural areas where you can build community is your safest bet.

Don't wait until food shortages get REALLY bad before stocking up.

 

Get a three-month's supply now while it's still available.

Prepare for sustained food shortages with long-term food storage.

 

Secure a potable water source.

 

Stock up on medical remedies.

 

Prepare for supply chains of all kinds to fail and stock up accordingly.

 

Transition out of fiat currency, either by spending it on things you'll need in the future, or buying physical gold and silver.

Prepare for energy shortages, rolling blackouts and the complete shut-down of the power grid.

 

Importantly, don't rely on high-tech solutions.

 

Include low-tech manual backups in your preps.

If the thought of all of this scares you, remember that taking action is the best remedy.

 

Knowing you're prepared will ease a lot of anxieties...

 

 

 


Why Free Speech Is on the Chopping Block

Free speech is a universal concept.

 

Everyone, everywhere, have a mind and want to express themselves without being censored or canceled for their views.

 

Free speech is now under attack worldwide, and the truly massive attack on free speech began at the same time as the coup d'état started.

 

This is because silencing dissent is required for the full takeover to occur.

"These technocrat transhumanist revolutionaries must destroy free speech at the same time that they take over the world, because they have to control the narrative," Wood explains.

 

"The attacks on free speech right now are absolutely legendary, off the charts, everywhere on the planet.

If Mattias Desmet is right, and I feel absolutely certain that he is, because I can read a history book as easy as anybody, when free speech is effectively silenced, that is when the killing of the scapegoat begins.

 

It's always the scapegoat that gets killed first.

 

There may be other groups that get mixed in, but the people who are the scapegoat are the ones that will be attacked by the mass formation psychosis crowd."

Eventually, the totalitarian regime will devour its own.

It'll kill its own leaders in the name of the greater good...

But in the meantime, it'll start by culling various scapegoats, one group after another.

"Original technocracy from the 1930s, was defined in their own magazine, which was called 'The Technocrat Magazine.'

They defined themselves in 1938 as 'the science of social engineering'...

That was what they said about themselves.

Technocracy is the science of social engineering and they talked incessantly in their literature about Pavlov and BF Skinner and how they could control people and mold people to the economy, to the utopia that they wanted to build.

They've had since 1938, at the very least, to think about how to develop the science of social engineering to be used against humanity. I don't think we need to even think about it any further.

We can feel it today. It's right in our face, every day.

 

They're using these techniques against the people of the world to manipulate them, to hypnotize them, to push them into mass formation psychosis.

 

Somebody at the top knows exactly what they're doing with this.

 

That's my point."

And, again, tech companies like Google and Facebook play central roles in that effort.

 

I look at Google as the Skynet of the Terminator series.

They're probably the worst offender of all the technology companies that are accelerating this.

 

They the champions of social engineering.

 

They own DeepMind, the most sophisticated artificial intelligence company on the planet, and they're clearly using it for nefarious purposes.

That said, they're certainly not alone.

 

 

 


Action Plan Moving Forward

In closing, we need to give careful thought to how we might slow down, block or at least limit the devastation that's been planned for us.

 

At the top of that list, aside from preparing yourself and your family with the essentials for life, is to buck the narrative.

"Anytime you feel like you're being given a role to play, just refuse to play that role," Wood says.

 

"I don't care what it is, just don't do it.

 

If they say,

'You need to wear a mask because blah, blah, blah - don't wear a mask. Just don't play the role they give you.'

I know, but there's a lot of personal choice here.

 

You got to make a personal decision on what it's worth to you to do it. I personally haven't worn a mask yet. It's cost me. I haven't flown an airplane for a long time. I didn't go a lot of places.

It's important to keep your mouth open, not shut.

 

We need to reestablish human connection again. This has been denied us with all the social distancing and lockdowns and everything else.

 

Get in touch with people. It hurts, I realize, for a lot of people, because relationships have been burned between children and parents and brothers and sisters. Get over it, deal with it.

You have to get out and reconnected with people again, because the future of humanity is in those connections.

Just don't argue with them. If you love them, love them anyway, in spite of where they are. But it's also important to get with like-minded people and spend time developing deeper relationships with people.

 

Guys have lost the ability to have best friends, almost universally across the country.

Women are better at having best friends, but they've been denied best friends because everything's been broken up. Get embedded in a local church and start going to these home fellowships, whatever, where people are meeting face to face and just talk to them...

We have a lot of answers and a lot of tangible things we can help people with.

 

You need to do it, be prepared to do it. When you have the opportunity, open your mouth and help them out. At least, give them some hope, because right now the other side wants you to have no hope.

 

They want to strip all hope away from you so that you will turn to the government or turn to the technocrats for help.

We need to help people with this whole hope business and not to sell hopium, as some people call it, but to give them some tangible help on what they can do right now to put up a defense around their own body, around their own mind or whatever it might be...

This is where we are as a world today - we, on the non-mass formation psychosis side, we're all in. Whether anybody else recognizes that as immaterial, but we are all in this.

 

This is the most important civilizational, existential thing that we'll ever deal with in our lifetime.

It really is that important.

 

It's not something we can just say,

'Well, it's just another problem,' kind of like, 'We had problems with Jimmy Carter.'

No, it's not that kind of problem.

 

This is a bigger existential threat that we're facing right now.

We must be dead serious. But there's hope, I will say. And until it's over, it's not over. We can make a difference and we need to try. We just can't throw up our hands and say there's no point trying, I'm going to go home and get drunk.

 

Klaus Schwab told you, with his own lips,

that by 2030 you will own nothing and you will be happy.

 

They're trying to make it happen.

 

Yes, they are...

One of the reasons, by the way, that the World Economic Forum has met with the United Nations to speed up the agenda, closer on this side of 2030, is because of the mounting resistance around the world to the agenda...

 

I'm convinced of this. I've been watching this since the beginning.

Americans can't have 500,000 people in the street protesting anything, that doesn't happen here. That's just not our culture. But not Europe, at the drop of a hat, you'll get a 100,000 people in the street, all screaming and banging pots and pans and hollering and carrying signs.

I know they see these massive hordes of people that are saying, essentially, 'Hell, no'…

 

This has to have an impact on them. I think that's one reason they're trying to accelerate the program right now and make it happen faster.

To me, that's just kind of a little bit of a sign of resistance is working, and this to me, this ought to tell the resistance to double down - double down right now on whatever it is you're doing.

 

Do twice as much as you did last week or last month and continue to put the pressure on it."

 

 

 

Sources and References

1 World Government Summit