Your Eminences,
Your Excellencies,
I address you, Archbishop
Gómez, as President of the
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, and to you,
Cardinals
Ladaria and
Müller, for your competence,
some serious considerations related to the
so-called vaccines
against Covid-19.
I believe there are some aspects of the question that now allow
for a more complete evaluation of what these drugs are and what
effects they cause.
This evaluation ought to lead to a collegial
stance, in conformity with the Magisterium of the Church and not
influenced by biased information or by erroneous news spread by
the producers of these drugs or by the media.
Subject of
the Note of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
The Note on the morality of using some anti-Covid-19 vaccines
was issued last year in the absence of complete data on both the
nature of the gene serum and its components.
I point out to you
that the subject of the Note is limited to,
"the moral aspects of
the use of the vaccines against Covid-19 that have been
developed from cell lines derived from tissues obtained from two
fetuses that were not spontaneously aborted," 1 and it states
that "[w]e do not intend to judge the safety and efficacy of
these vaccines, although ethically relevant and necessary, as
this evaluation is the responsibility of biomedical researchers
and drug agencies." 2
Safety and effectiveness are thus not the
subject of the Note, which in expressing its opinion about the
"morality of use" therefore does not even express its opinion
about the "morality of production" of these drugs.
Safety and
effectiveness of the vaccines
The safety and effectiveness of individual vaccines is
determined after a period of experimentation that normally lasts
for several years.
In this case, the health authorities have
decided to carry out experimentation on the entire world
population, as an exception to the usual practice of the
scientific community, international standards, and the laws of
individual nations.
This means that the entire population finds
itself in the condition of being susceptible to suffering the
adverse effects of the vaccine, at their own risk, when normally
experimentation is done on a voluntary basis and carried out on
a limited number of subjects, who are paid to undergo it.
I think it is clear that this is an experimental drug that has
not been approved, 3 but only authorized for administration by
the bodies in charge.
Just as I think it is evident that there
are medical treatments without adverse side-effects, even though
they have been systematically boycotted by the Health
Institutions -
WHO, CDC, EMA - and by
mainstream media.
Even if
the Church should express a moral evaluation of the different
treatments available - some of which are carried out with drugs
produced with cell lines that originated in an aborted fetus,
like the vaccines - it must be reiterated that there are
effective treatments which cure patients and allow them to
develop permanent natural immune defenses, something that the
vaccines do not do.
Furthermore, these treatments do not cause
serious side effects, since the drugs that are used have been
licensed for decades.
Other recently developed treatments are absolutely effective,
inexpensive, and carry no danger for those who receive them:
this is the case with the plasma treatment studied and employed
with great success by the Italian doctor Giuseppe De Donno.
4
Treatment with hyper-immune plasma was strongly discouraged and
boycotted by pharmaceutical companies and doctors financed by
them, because it does not cost anything and renders the
analogous therapy useless, which is made in laboratories with
monoclonal cells at exorbitant costs.
International standards specify that an experimental drug cannot
be authorized for distribution except in the absence of an
effective alternative treatment:
this is why drug agencies in
the USA and Europe have prevented the use of
hydroxychloroquine,
ivermectin, hyper-immune plasma, and other therapies with proven
effectiveness.
There is no need to remind you that all of these
agencies, along with the WHO, are financed almost entirely by
the pharmaceutical companies and by foundations tied to them,
and that there is a very grave conflict of interest at the
highest levels, 5 about which the media are culpably silent.
6
In expressing a moral evaluation of the vaccines,
the Church
cannot fail to take these elements into consideration, since
they cause a manipulation of scientific information, on the
basis of which the judgments about their moral liceity by
ecclesiastical Authority have been formulated.
The
experimental drugs are not vaccines in the proper sense
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, while not
expressing its opinion on the effectiveness and safety of the
so-called vaccines, nevertheless defines them as "vaccines,"
taking for granted that they actually give immunity and protect
people from active and passive contagion.
This element is
disavowed by the declarations coming from all of the world's
health authorities and from the WHO, according to which
vaccinated people can become infected and infect others more
seriously than those who are not vaccinated 7 and find that,
their immune defenses are drastically reduced if not even
completely destroyed...
A recent study confirms that the gene serum can cause forms of
acquired immuno-deficiency in those who receive it. 8
Therefore, the drugs that are called
"vaccines" do not fall
within the official definition of a vaccine to which the CDF's
Note presumably refers.
In fact a "vaccine" is defined as a
medicinal preparation aimed at inducing the production of
protective antibodies by the organism, conferring specific
resistance against a specific infectious disease (viral,
bacterial, protozoal).
This definition was recently changed by
the WHO, because otherwise it would not have been able to
include anti-Covid drugs, which do not induce the production of
protective antibodies and do not confer a specific resistance
against
the SarsCoV-2 infectious disease.
Furthermore, while mRNA serums are dangerous because of the
implications they have at the genetic level, the AstraZeneca
serum may be even more harmful, as recent studies show. 9
Proportionality between the costs and benefits of the vaccines
Limiting itself to an evaluation only of the morality of the use
of the vaccines, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
does not take into account the proportionality between the
presumed benefits of the gene serum and the short-term and
long-term adverse side effects.
Worldwide, the number of deaths and grave pathologies following
vaccination is increasing exponentially: 10
in only nine months
these vaccines have caused more deaths than all vaccines in the
last thirty years. 11
Not only this:
in many nations - such as
Israel for example 12 - the number of deaths after vaccination
is now greater than the number of deaths from Covid. 13
Having established that the drugs sold as vaccines do not give
any significant benefit and on the contrary may cause a very
high percentage of deaths or grave pathologies 14 even in
subjects for whom Covid does not represent a threat, 15 I do
not think that we can conclude that there is any proportionality
between the potential damages and the potential benefits.
This means therefore that there is a grave moral obligation to
refuse inoculation as a possible and proximate cause of
permanent damages 16 or death.
In the absence of benefits,
there is therefore no need to expose oneself to the risks of its
administration, but on the contrary there is a duty to refuse it
categorically.
New data
on the presence of aborted fetal cell lines
Revelations from Pfizer executives have recently been released
showing that the mRNA gene serums contain aborted fetal material
not only for the production of the original vaccine, but also
for its replication and production on a vast scale, 17 and
nothing suggests that other pharmaceutical companies are an
exception.
Bishop Joseph Strickland
18 has also expressed
himself in this regard, inviting the faithful to,
"say no. I'm
not going to do it just because you mandate it, in that, who
knows what next crazy thing will come up."
This makes the use
of these drugs absolutely immoral, just as it is
immoral and unacceptable to use drugs that use orphaned
children for experimentation. 19
Side
Effects on pregnant mothers and nursing children
Another aspect to consider is the concrete danger of grave side
effects on pregnant mothers and even more serious ones on
newborn children:
in the United States there have been 675
miscarriages in vaccinated mothers and in the United Kingdom 521
nursing infants have died. 20
We should remember that for the
so-called vaccines against Covid active vigilance was not put
into effect, but only passive vigilance, which requires patients
to report adverse cases themselves.
This means that the data on
adverse effects should be multiplied at least ten times.
Components
of the vaccines
I would like to point out to you that the components of the gene
serums are still concealed as trade secrets, even if there are
already multiple studies that have analyzed the content of the
vaccines. 21
It is therefore not yet possible to completely
evaluate the other critical elements and their long-term
impacts, because,
the experimentation on the world population
will end only in 2023/2025, and it is not known what the effects
of the newly adopted technology are at the genetic level.
22
The presence of
graphene in the doses that have been
administered, reported by numerous laboratories that have
analyzed its content, 23 suggests that the forced use of
so-called vaccines - together with the systematic boycott
of existing treatments of proven effectiveness 24 - serves the
purpose of contact-tracing all vaccinated human beings
throughout the world, who will be or already are connected to
the
Internet of Things 25 by means of a quantum link of pulsed
microwave frequencies of 2.4 GHz or higher
from cell towers and
satellites. 26
As proof that this information is not the fruit
of the fantasies of some conspiracy theorist, you should know
that the European Union has chosen two projects dedicated to
technological innovation as the winners of a competition:
-
"The Human
Brain"
-
"Graphene"...
These two projects
will receive one billion euro each in funding over the next ten
years. 27
I trust that Your Excellency, Archbishop Gomez, will take into
serious consideration these observations of mine - which I have
taken care to thoroughly verify with highly qualified Catholic
doctors 28 - together with your brothers of the US Bishops'
Conference gathered in plenary Assembly from November 15 to 18,
2021 in Baltimore, so that,
the official position of the Catholic
Church in the United States on the so-called vaccines will be
revised and updated...
Likewise, I ask Your Eminence, Cardinal
Ladaria, to proceed as soon as possible to the revision of
the
Note of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on the
morality of certain anti-Covid-19 vaccines.
I realize that it may be extremely unpopular to take a position
against the so-called vaccines, but as Shepherds of the flock of
the Lord we have the duty to denounce the horrible crime that is
being carried out, whose goal is to create billions of
chronically ill people and to exterminate millions and millions
of people, based on the infernal ideology of the "Great Reset"
formulated by the President of the World Economic Forum,
Klaus Schwab, and endorsed
by institutions and organizations around the world. 29
The silence of so many cardinals and bishops, along with the
inconceivable promotion of the vaccination campaign by the Holy
See, represents a form of unprecedented complicity that cannot
continue any longer.
It is necessary to denounce this scandal,
this crime against humanity, this satanic action against God.
With every passing day, thousands of people are dying or are
being affected in their health by the illusion that the
so-called vaccines guarantee a solution to the pandemic
emergency.
The Catholic Church has the duty before God and all
of humanity to denounce this tremendous and horrible crime with
the utmost firmness, giving clear directions and taking a stand
against those who, in the name of a pseudo-science subservient
to the interests of the pharmaceutical companies and the
globalist elite, have only intentions of death.
How
Joe Biden,
who also defines himself as "Catholic," could impose vaccination
on 28 million children aged 5 to 11, 30 is absolutely
inconceivable, if only for the fact that there is practically
zero risk of them developing the SARS-CoV-2 disease.
The Holy
See and the Bishops' Conferences have the duty to express a firm
condemnation in this regard, and also in relation to the very
serious side effects that can result for children who are
inoculated with the experimental gene serum. 31
It is equally imperative that there be an intervention by the US
Bishops' Conference aimed at promoting the religious exemption
and immediately revoking the bans imposed in this regard by many
Ordinaries on their priests.
Similarly, all vaccination
requirements for seminarians and candidates of religious
communities must be revoked.
Instead, clear directives should be
given about the dangers connected to the administration of the
vaccine and its grave moral implications.
I am certain that you will want to consider the particular
gravity of this subject, the urgency of an intervention that is
enlightened by and faithful to the teaching of the Gospel, as
well as the salus animarum that the Pastors of the Church must
promote and defend.
In Christo Rege,
Carlo Maria
Viganò, Archbishop
Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
