Your Excellency, after the psycho-'pandemic', we now have the
Russian-Ukrainian crisis.
Are we in "phase two" of one single project, or can we now
consider the Covid farce to be over and concern ourselves with
the increase in energy prices?
If in the last two years we had been faced with a true
'pandemic,' caused by a deadly virus for which no other cures
existed except for a vaccine, we would be able to think that the
emergency was not intended.
But this is not what
happened:
the
SARS-CoV-2 virus is nothing but a seasonal flu that
could have been cured with existing treatments and effective
prevention based on strengthening immune defenses.
The prohibition of
treatment, the discrediting of the effectiveness of drugs that
have been in use for decades, the decision to hospitalize the
elderly who became sick in nursing homes and the imposition of
an experimental gene treatment that has been demonstrated not
only to be ineffective but also harmful and often fatal - all
this confirms for us that the 'pandemic' has been planned and
managed with the purpose of creating the greatest damage
possible.
This is a fact that
has been established and confirmed by the official data, despite
the systematic falsification of that same data.
Certainly, those who wanted to manage the 'pandemic' in this way
are not disposed now to yield easily, also because there are
billionaire interests behind all of it.
But what "they" want
does not always necessarily happen.
In your opinion, Your Excellency, was the 'pandemic' managed in
this way due to inexperience?
Or was it due to the corruption of those in positions of control
who are in a conflict of interest because they are paid off by
the pharmaceutical industry?
This is the second element to consider:
the response to
the 'pandemic' was the same all over the world, where health
authorities slavishly adapted to health protocols that were
contrary to the scientific literature and medical evidence,
instead following the directives of self-proclaimed
"experts," who have a record of sensational failures,
apocalyptic predictions completely divorced from reality,
and very grave conflicts of interest.
We cannot think that
millions of doctors all over the world have lost their basic
knowledge of the art of medicine, believing that a flu should be
allowed to evolve into pneumonia and then be treated with
tachypirin or by placing patients on ventilators.
If they have done
this, it is due to pressure - even to the point of blackmail -
by health authorities over medical personnel, with the help of a
scandalous campaign of media terrorism and with the support of
Western leaders.
Most of these leaders
are members of a lobby - the
World Economic Forum - that
trained them and placed them at the highest levels of national
and international institutions in order to be certain that those
who govern would be obedient.
Klaus Schwab has publicly
boasted, on many occasions, of being able to interfere even with
religious leaders.
These too are
documented facts in all the nations that followed the directives
of
the WHO and
the pharmaceutical companies.
There is clearly a
single script under a single direction: this demonstrates the
existence of a criminal design and the malice of its creators.
In some of
your other statements, you have spoken of a "golpe bianco" (a
"silent coup").
A "silent coup" is a coup d'état that takes place without the
use of force, carried out by a government that exercises power
in an unconstitutional way.
In this case the coup was carried out in all the Western nations
almost simultaneously, beginning with the first years of the
1990s.
For Italy, this coup
began with the divestment of investee companies and the
privatization of services that normally burdened the treasury,
such as health and transportation services, following the
directives given by high finance to Mario Draghi on June 2,
1992, on the yacht Britannia.
Yes, Mario Draghi,
who at the time was General Director of the Ministry of the
Treasury and whom then-President of the Italian Republic
Francesco Cossiga called a "cowardly businessman."
In other nations this
coup took place in an analogous way, with a series of
progressive transfers of sovereignty to supra-national entities
like,
With the introduction
of the euro [in 2002], monetary sovereignty was removed from the
nations adhering to the Maastricht Treaty, transferring it to
the European Central Bank, which is a private bank.
This bank decides the
rate with which it finances national budgets, using money that
these same nations have already given it.
In practice, the
European Central Bank demands interest on money that it only
returns a penny at a time, and only on certain conditions:
reforms, cuts in
public spending, the imposition of laws promoting gender
equality, abortion rights, the indoctrination of children,
etc.
The introduction of a
balanced budget requirement into the [Italian] Constitution - as
if the State was a company - was also part of the silent coup.
All the members of these bodies, including the same rulers who
have been appointed at the recommendation of non-elected powers
or have succeeded in winning election thanks to the manipulation
of information, are at the same time the servants of high
finance power groups or of large investment funds - some were
their employees, such as Draghi of Goldman Sachs - others became
employees after their term ended.
Just like the drug
agencies and health organizations are composed of former
BigPharma employees, who often
receive consulting contracts and who are paid by the very
pharmaceutical companies they are supposed to be keeping an eye
on.
Up until the 'pandemic', power was in practice still managed at
least formally by individual nations, and laws were passed by
Parliaments.
But for the last two
years, the Parliaments have been deprived of authority, and all
those whom the World Economic Forum and other lobbies have
succeeded in placing at the high levels of governments and
international institutions have begun to legislate against the
Constitution and the interests of the Nation, obeying orders
given to them from on high - "from the markets," they tell us -
which in fact is made up of a very small number of multinational
corporations that engulf competing companies, flatten
professional skills with damage to the quality of the product,
and reduce the protection and wages of workers thanks to the
complicity of unions and of the Left.
In short, we are governed by a high command of usurers and
speculators, from
Bill Gates who invests in
large farms right on the eve of the food emergency or in
vaccines just before the outbreak of the 'pandemic', to
George Soros, who
speculates on the fluctuations of currencies and government
bondsand along with Hunter Biden finances a
bio-laboratory in Ukraine.
To think that there is no relationship between the instigators
of these crimes and those who carry them out at the highest
levels of national governments,
the EU, and
the UN is a sign of bad faith,
because even a child could understand that we are held hostage
by a group of technocrats who are ideologically deviant and
morally corrupt.
The peoples of the
world need to reclaim their sovereignty, which has been usurped
by the globalist elite.
The instigators of this crime show themselves proudly at the
Davos Forum, at meetings of the
Trilateral Commission or the
Bilderberg Group along with
the,
rulers, prime
ministers, directors of newspapers and television
broadcasters, CEOs of social bankers and directors of social
platforms and multinational corporations, bankers and
directors of ratings agencies, presidents of foundations and
self-styled philanthropists.
All of these
share the same agenda - which they publish on
their websites - and are so confident in their own power that
they affirm it with impunity - as Soros and Schwab have recently
done - that it is necessary to create a narrative to be conveyed
through the mainstream media, in order to make their decisions
acceptable to the people.
They embrace
censorship and mass manipulation as instrumentum regni,
and we have had proof of this both with the 'pandemic' farce as
well as with the pro-Zelensky propaganda in Ukraine.
We must understand that our rulers are traitors of our Nation
who are devoted to the elimination of populations, and that all
of their actions are carried out in order to cause the greatest
amount of harm to citizens.
It is not a problem
of inexperience or inability but rather of an intentio
nocendi - a deliberate intention to harm.
Honest citizens find
it inconceivable that those who govern them could do it with the
perverse intention of undermining and destroying them, so much
so that they find it very hard to believe.
The main cause of
this very serious problem is found in the corruption of
authority along with the resigned obedience of those who are
governed.
The Catholic Church also, beginning with the revolution of
Vatican II and above all during the last nine years of the
Bergoglian
"pontificate," has
experienced the same cognitive dissonance: the faithful and the
Clergy have resigned themselves to obeying mere cynical
officials - who are no less corrupt and perverted than their
counterparts in the deep state - although it has been evident
that the purpose of the alleged "reforms" has always been the
systematic destruction of the Church by its highest leaders, who
are heretics and traitors.
And I note that the
deep church has had recourse to the same false arguments in
order to pass off the doctrinal, moral, and liturgical
dissolution:
first of all, the
false contention that those reforms were requested "from the
ground up" and not imposed with force from on high.
Just like the reforms
planned by the World Economic Forum, the Bilderberg group, and
the Trilateral are adopted by their infiltrators in the highest
levels of nations and international organisms, making it appear
that their plans are ratified by popular consent.
And what do you advise, Your Excellency, to get out of this dead
end?
Respect for authority is connatural to civilized man, but it is
necessary to distinguish between obedience and servility.
You see, every virtue
consists of the just mean between two opposite vices, without
being a compromise, but also as the peak between two valleys, so
to speak.
Disobedience sins by
falling short, not wanting to submit to a good order of a
legitimate authority; servility on the other hand sins by
excess, submitting to unfair orders or orders given by an
illegitimate authority.
The good citizen
should know how to disobey civil authority, and the good
Catholic how to do the same with ecclesiastical authority,
disobeying whenever the authority demands obedience to an
iniquitous order.
Doesn't such talk seem to be a bit revolutionary, Your
Excellency?
Far from it.
The anarchists and
courtiers both have a distorted concept of authority:
the former deny
it while the latter idolize it.
The just mean is the
only morally viable way, because it responds to the order that
the Lord has imprinted on the world and that respect the
celestial hierarchy.
We owe obedience to
legitimate authority in the measure in which its power is
exercised for the purposes for which authority has been
established by God:
the temporal good
of citizens in the case of the State and the spiritual good
of the faithful in the case of the Church.
An authority that
imposes evil on its subjects is for that very reason
illegitimate and its orders are null.
Let's not forget that
the true Lord from whom all authority comes is God, and that the
earthly authority - civil as well as spiritual - is always
vicarious, that is, it is subject to the authority of Jesus
Christ, King and High Priest.
Setting up the
vicarious authority of rulers in the place of the royal
authority of the Lord is a mad gesture and - yes - revolutionary
and rebellious.
What does the elite want to obtain?
It promises us peace, security, prosperity, and work, but there
are more than fifty armed conflicts currently taking place in
the world; our cities are unlivable, full of criminals, immersed
in decay and dominated by minorities of deviant people.
This is the third indisputable element that should not be
overlooked:
the ''pandemic'' was planned
as an instrument for the establishment of a totalitarian
regime, conceived by unelected technocrats who are devoid of
any sense of democratic representation.
The same thing is
happening with
the Ukraine crisis:
the majority of
citizens is absolutely not in favor of sending weapons to
Ukraine and imposing sanctions against the Russian
Federation, and yet heads of government act as if they have
the complete support of their own nations, supported by
embarrassing falsifications of reality by the mainstream
media.
And in certain
countries such as Italy, this is taking place in a situation of
disturbing complicity by all the powers of the State, both in
legitimizing the violation of fundamental rights under the anti-Covid
regulations as well as in ratifying participation in a conflict
even though there was never any deliberation about entering it
by the Italian Parliament, and which even the President of the
Republic, the guarantor of the Constitution, approves and
encourages, to the applause of European technocrats.
In this case too,
those who govern are neither obeying the will of the people not
pursuing the common good, but rather following orders handed
down to them from supranational entities with their own
interests, which we know are subversive.
When they speak of "transformation of goods into-services," of
"sharing economy" through the digital sector, they intend to
expropriate private property from citizens:
"You will own
nothing and you will be happy."
And when they impose
the privatization of state goods or services, they want to
appropriate the profits while leaving the costs on the shoulders
of the community.
But since not all
countries are willing to do this "reset," they are forcing them
to accept it by provoking economic crises, 'pandemic's, and
wars.
This is high
treason and subversion...
The premeditated
nature of this subversion is blatantly clear, as is the
awareness of the disastrous consequences of the social,
economic, and health decisions that have been made both with
regard to the 'pandemic' as well as the Ukraine crisis.
Bergoglio has also admitted
it:
a head of state
revealed to him, months before Putin's military operation in
Ukraine, that NATO and the European Union are deliberately
provoking the Russian Federation, after having ignored for
years the ethnic cleansing carried out by Kiev against the
Russian-speaking minority in Donbass and the Crimea.
The purpose of this
provocation was to spark a conflict that would provide a cover
to legitimize imposing sanctions against the Russian Federation
and force Western nations to undertake the "green transition."
And at the same time,
it would prostrate the economy of nations to the advantage of a
few international investment funds and market speculation.
In essence, the same
premises are given that were made to justify the Enclosure Acts
in England and later the Holodomor in Ukraine in order to
transform the peasant masses into low-cost labor for the
industrialization of the large cities.
If war was to be
avoided, NATO should not have been enlarged in violation of the
treaties, and protection should have been assured for the
Russian-speaking minority in Ukraine, as called for by the 2014
Minsk Protocol.
If this has not been done, it is because the real-purpose that
they have wanted to achieve has nothing to do with the apparent
purpose they have publicly declared.
And I note that these
are not abstract speculations but concrete facts that were
anticipated and planned decades ago by
Great Reset theorists, with the
aim of forcing a social change that nobody wants, making the
economy and finance of the Western world start over from scratch
- just like one restarts a computer.
The fact that this causes misery, bankruptcy, the failure of
businesses, unemployment, social instability, and the widening
of the gap between the rich and poor, the decline of the birth
rate and the reduction of essential services is considered a
negligible detail, with the sole concern of indoctrinating the
masses with false arguments in favor of war or the control of
every detail of people's lives, criminalizing whoever dissents
and pointing to them as the enemy of the people.
It seems to me that
this narrative is sinking under the weight of the lies of the
elite and its accomplices.
Could you give us an example, Your Excellency?
The most obvious example is discovering that Richard Kalergi,
one of the founding fathers of the European Union, wanted to
pursue social engineering policies aimed at modifying European
national societies through immigration and cross breeding,
driving migration waves with the attractiveness of cheaper labor
costs.
Seeing the wicked
obstinacy with which the waves of illegal immigrants continue to
be welcomed, even when the impact that this phenomenon has on
the safety of cities and on the general crime rate and the
identity of national populations is obvious, demonstrates that
the initial plan has been realized for the most part, and that
action must be taken to prevent it from being completed.
And yet these are not things that are happening by chance: they
have told us so.
You are absolutely right:
what baffles me
is noting with what impudence the proponents of the
Agenda 2030 have told us
well in advance which criminal projects they intended to
impose on us against our will.
Despite this
evidence, there are those who amazed that after years of
unstoppable infiltration they are actually realizing their plans
right in front of our eyes even as they accuse us of being
"conspiracy theorists."
There is definitely a
conspiracy, but the ones who must be put on trial are the ones
who have carried it out, not those who denounce it.
Joe Biden lays responsibility for the crisis at the feet of
Vladimir Putin.
Do you agree with this judgment?
Americans are well aware that the price of gasoline had risen
well before the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, and further increased
due to sanctions - real or alleged - of the international
community against the Russian Federation.
Today we know that
sanctions - as was foreseeable - have not affected Putin in the
least, but the motive behind them is that they were supposed to
strike Western nations, and in particular the nations of Europe,
in order to provoke an economic and energy crisis by means of
which to legitimize the ecological transition, rations,
population control, and the censorship of information.
Putin did not take the bait offered him by the
provocations of
the Deep State, limiting
himself to intervening only as necessary to give security and
protection to Russian-speaking Donbass.
And he stormed the
Azovstal steel plant, which hid one of the secret American
biolabs that produced bacteriological weapons and carried out
experiments with
SARS-CoV-2.
On the other hand,
the
Biden family had every
interest in a having a war in Ukraine, in order to cover up the
corruption cases involving Hunter Biden and to distract people
from the impending scandals looming over Obama and
Hillary Clinton for Russiagate and over the deep state for
the electoral fraud carried out against Trump.
The US proxy war against the Russian invasion is in reality a
war of the deep state against a nation that has refused to
accept being engulfed by the delusions of globalist technocrats
and that today has proofs of the crimes committed by the deep
state.
But while the EU can
blackmail European nations, tying the disbursement of funds and
interest rates on loans to the implementation of "reforms" -
since these nations have limited monetary and fiscal sovereignty
- the same is not true
for Russia, which is a
sovereign and independent nation, as well as self-sufficient in
terms of raw materials, energy, and agricultural food resources.
Is this bipolar vision, which re-proposes the Cold War
confrontation between the USA and the USSR, no longer valid?
The hegemonic Left has established a Manichean division between
good and evil:
left vs. right,
liberalism vs. fascism, globalism vs. sovereignism,
vaccinism vs. No-vax...
The "good guys" are
obviously those on the left:
liberal but
supportive, globalist, inclusive, ecumenical, resilient, and
sustainable.
The "bad guys" are
just as obviously patriots, Christians, right-wingers,
sovereignists, and heterosexuals.
What distinguishes the current structure of Western countries
from the past?
The fusion of the worst of liberalism with the worst of
collective socialism.
Today we see, after
two years of the 'pandemic' farce, how globalist liberalism has
made use of communist and dictatorial methods to impose itself
with its
Great Reset, and how the
communist regimes are using liberal methods to enrich the upper
echelons of the party without losing total control over the
population.
This demonstrates
that the geopolitical balance is shifting towards a multi-polar
vision and that bipolarism fueled by the deep state is in
decline.
Is there
any analogy between what is happening in the Catholic Church
under the pontificate of Jorge Mario Bergoglio?
The deep church is an offshoot of the deep
state, in a certain sense.
For this reason it
should not surprise us that we are witnessing the demolition of
Faith and Morals in the name of ecumenism and synodality,
applying liberal errors in the theological sphere; and on the
other hand the transformation of the Papacy and the Roman Curia
into a politburo in which ecclesiastical authority is both
absolute and also released from its fidelity to the Magisterium,
following the modalities of the exercise of power in a
communist-type dictatorship.
The law is no longer
founded on Justice but rather on the convenience and utility of
those who apply it:
it is enough to
see how harshly the clergy and faithful who are traditional
are treated by the Vatican, and on the other hand with how
much indulgence the Vatican praises notorious pro-abortion
activists (I am thinking of Biden and Pelosi among the most
striking cases) as well as the propagandists of LGBTQ
ideology and gender theory.
Here too, liberalism
and communism have formed an alliance to demolish the
institution from within, just as has happened in the civil
sphere.
But we know that
contra legem fit, quod in fraudem legis fit - that which
circumvents the law is done against the law.
Your Excellency, how do you think things in the United States
can change in the near future?
The eventual return of
Donald Trump to the White
House would allow for real peace negotiations, once the deep
state has been eradicated from the Administration and government
agencies.
But the
reconstruction will certainly require the collaboration and
sacrifices of everyone, and a solid spiritual vision that
inspires the reconstruction of the social fabric.
If all of this has
happened through the demonstrated electoral fraud of the last
Presidential election, Trump's victory would be even more
striking and would have strong repercussions on the
ramifications of the deep state in Europe and in particular in
Italy.
In any case, the mid-term elections could allow the Republicans
to have a majority in the House and in the Senate, once the
servants of the deep state - including first of all the
"neo-cons" - have been ousted.
The failure of the effort to blame Trump for the farce of the
assault on the Capitol ought to dissuade its organizers - among
whom we cannot fail to number Nancy Pelosi - from trying
to replicate the scene next fall, which would fall into the
grotesque, in addition to being a case of déjà vu.
So has the
Great Reset failed? Can we sing a victory song?
A victory song can be sung only when the war has been won.
The
Great Reset is ontologically
destined for failure, because it is inspired by inhuman and
diabolical principles.
But its end, however
inevitable, may still take some time, depending on our capacity
to oppose it and also what is contained in the plans of Divine
Providence.
If the Lord wants to grant us a truce, a period of peace after
we have understood how horrible is the hell on earth that the
enemies of God and man desire, then we must commit ourselves to
rebuild - not "build back better" but just the opposite - yes,
rebuild what has been destroyed:
the family, the
bond of marriage, the moral education of children, love for
our country, dedication to hard work, and fraternal charity,
especially towards those who are the most defenseless and
needy...
We must reaffirm the
holiness and untouchable sanctity of life from conception to
natural death:
defending the
complementary nature of the two sexes against the insanity
of gender ideology, protecting children from corruption and
guaranteeing the innocence to which they are entitled.
We must finally set
aside the logic of profit - which is typical of the liberal
mentality - in order to regain the pride of fulfilling our duty
even when no one is watching us, of producing what we make in a
professional manner and selling it at an honest price.
And we must stop
considering ourselves inferior simply because someone has
decided that in their godless model of dystopian society being
honest, loyal, sincere, and God-fearing is something to be
ashamed of.
The ones who ought to
be ashamed, rather, are those who call for,
the killing of
children and the elderly, the planned extermination of the
population through wicked vaccine campaigns, mass
sterilization, sodomy, pedophilia, and all the most deviant
aberrations.
Your Excellency, do you believe that the world can return to
God?
The world can and must return to God:
this is a
necessity dictated by the divine order that the Creator has
imprinted on creation.
It must return to
God, because only where Christ reigns can there by true justice
and true peace.
And the world can do
this, but not in a collectivist or communitarian vision in which
individuals disappear into the mass, but rather in a personal
and individual vision, in which each one of us freely recognizes
that nothing can be better than what Our Heavenly Father has
prepared for us, since He loves us and wants to make us sharers
in His glory.
If we all return to God, our Nations will also recognize His
Lordship and will conform their laws to His Law.
Let us pray therefore
that what the Psalmist sings may be realized:
Laudate Dominum
omnes gentes; laudate eum omnes populi (Ps 116:1)– Praise
the Lord, all you nations, praise him all you peoples.
Quoniam
confirmata est super nos misericordia ejus; et veritas
Domini manet in æternum (Ps 116:2) - For his Mercy is
confirmed upon us, and the Truth of the Lord remains
forever.
+
Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
21 June 2022, Saint Aloysius Gonzaga
