by Dr. Joseph Mercola
September
28, 2023
from
Mercola Website
Story at-a-glance
-
In
1967, the CIA's covert use of the National Student
Association to spread counter-messages to communism was
revealed by a college dropout named Michael Wood. The
revelation sent shockwaves through the U.S., and as
journalists started to pull at the strings, the CIA's
covert propaganda operations unraveled
-
Journalists discovered the CIA had set up nonprofit
foundations to funnel taxpayer money into philanthropic
foundations that then sent the CIA's "donations" to
organizations that had joined the CIA's payroll to
promote government-sponsored propaganda
-
These included youth organizations and student groups,
church groups, public radio and news organizations. Sen.
Wayne Morse, D-Ore., slammed the CIA's covert propaganda
activities, arguing the agency had created a
"credibility chasm" within public opinion - a gap that
could not and would not be bridged unless the government
made clear that it would "fill the chasm with the truth"
-
The
CIA was never reined in and is more involved in
propaganda activities today than ever before
-
While many still have not realized it, we are at war,
and the aggressors are government intelligence and
security agencies that have turned their weapon of
choice - information - against their own citizens
The
Deadly War
Hardly Anyone
Realizes We're Fighting.
Many people still haven't woken up
to the fact that
we are in the fight of our lives,
mainly because
the aggressors are agencies
that we've long
trusted.
But make no
mistake,
they've turned
against us
and soon life as
you know it
will become
unrecognizable.
The worst part?
They won't care
if you live or die...
The video at bottom page
features a 1967 CBS special report titled "In the Pay of the CIA
- An
American Dilemma," 1 hosted by Mike Wallace.
It examines how the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was secretly paying students,
labor organizations, broadcasting networks and other organizations
to do their bidding.
CBS News correspondents interview several of the people who at the
time had received secret CIA payments, and the implications these
activities have for the American way of life.
Gloria Steinem, for example, who headed the Independent
Research Service, was paid by the CIA to send American students to
attend and represent American values at communist youth festivals
overseas, as was Philip Sherburne, former president of the
National Student Association.
In 1967, the CIA's covert use of the National Student Association to
spread counter-messages to communism was revealed by a college
dropout named Michael Wood. 2
The revelation sent
shockwaves through the U.S., and as journalists started to pull at
the strings, the extent of the CIA's propaganda operations started
to unravel.
A
Condensed History
The National Security Act of 1947, signed by President Truman,
created,
As explained by the
Office of the Historian, 4 the Act,
"was a major
reorganization of the foreign policy and military establishments
of the U.S. government."
The CIA was an outgrowth
of the World War II era Office of Strategic Services and several
small post-war intelligence organizations, and as noted by Wallace:
"Since the beginning,
the CIA has suffered a personality split, because in addition to
intelligence, the Security Act of 1947 orders the CIA to,
'perform other
functions and duties as directed by the President and his
National Security Council.'
That phrase has
become a sort of blank check, authorizing CIA excursions into
everything from simple propaganda to the overthrow of unfriendly
governments."
Wallace goes on to
explain how the CIA ended up with fingers in so many pies.
First, it set up several
nondescript nonprofit foundations, the function of which were to
funnel taxpayer money from the CIA to other, real foundations
involved in real-world philanthropy.
However, in return for CIA funds, these foundations "agreed to
become conduits for central intelligence," and funneled the exact
dollar amounts received on to other organizations that, in the
1940s, '50s and '60s, joined the CIA's payroll to promote
government-sponsored propaganda.
The CIA
has corrupted the stream of truth...
It must be
removed from all activities,
except the very
limited activity
of what we know
as intelligence activity,
the field of
spying and espionage.
Sen. Wayne Morse
1967
These included not only youth organizations and student groups, but
also church groups, public radio and news organizations.
Sen. Wayne Morse
slammed the CIA's covert propaganda activities, arguing the agency
had created a "credibility chasm" within public opinion - a gap that
could not and would not be bridged unless the government made clear
that it would,
"fill the chasm with
the truth."
"The CIA has corrupted the stream of truth, objectivity and
academic learning," Morse told CBS News, "and it must be removed
from all activities, except the very limited activity of what we
know as intelligence activity, the field of spying and
espionage."
Another senator,
Eugene McCarthy, was also critical of the CIA's use of students
and church groups to manipulate public opinion.
He also said,
he felt there was
"empire building" going on within the CIA - a statement that
rings all the more true today.
Sen. John Stennis,
member of the CIA Watchdog Subcommittee, defended the CIA's actions,
reminding the CBS audience about the climate in which the agency was
founded.
In 1954, the U.S.
Congress passed a bill outlawing communism, and the CIA was still
basically 'protecting' American liberty and democracy.
Former CIA director Allen Dulles also defended the agency's
behavior,
citing the need to manage the threat of
communism.
The counterargument
presented by critics was that by using covert propaganda techniques,
the U.S. government was using the same strategies as the enemy,
thereby undermining the idea of America being a country dedicated to
free speech and the diversity of ideas.
At the end of the day, the overarching message of the CBS News
report was that,
the CIA needed to
change with changing times, clean up its act and get out of the
covert propaganda business, as its interventions were harming
the American image of being a free and open country...
Operation Mockingbird Is Alive and Well
Unfortunately,
the CIA was never reined in, and its propaganda
activities have only expanded and become more sophisticated over
time.
The 1976 Church
Investigation,
exposed how the CIA had corrupted the media by
paying journalists to promote the agency's narratives.
The program, called
Operation Mockingbird, was
officially dismantled, but while the operational name may have been
retired, there's plenty of evidence to suggest the CIA never
discontinued its media influence. 5
In fact, we have evidence the CIA is
controlling mainstream media to
this day, and it's doing so with unprecedented efficiency, as it can
now push its narratives out through the three global news agencies,
which are responsible for crafting and curating most of the news
disseminated worldwide.
The only thing that has changed, really, is the CIA's narrative.
Whereas in the past it was dedicated to undermining communism,
today, the CIA is,
a disinformation fountainhead for an unelected
global
Deep State that is hell-bent on implementing a technocratic,
totalitarian
One World Government, the tyranny of which makes
communism pale in comparison.
The CIA is now neck-deep in a global psyop to ensure the successful
implementation of
The Great Reset and the
Fourth Industrial Revolution
- two terms that describe different aspects of the same
agenda of enslavement...
And the CIA is not alone in this endeavor.
The FBI is also in on the action, as are most of the world's
intelligence agencies.
They're all pushing the same
Great Reset and
Fourth Industrial Revolution narratives, the aim of which is,
the
technocratic control of the global population...
That's why we're
seeing the same narratives playing all over the world, including
the
Orwellian argument that we must censor to protect democracy.
A New
Type of War
While many still have not realized it, we are at war...!
The aggressors
are government intelligence and security agencies that have turned
their weapon of choice - information - against their own citizens.
And, while the organizations doing the CIA's dirty work may have
changed, the basic organizational structure is the same as it was in
1967.
Taxpayer money gets funneled through various federal
departments and agencies into the hands of nongovernmental agencies
that carry out censorship activities as directed.
As recently reported by
investigative journalists Alex Gutentag and Michael Shellenberger:
6
"The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the
Center for Countering Digital
Hate (CCDH), and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) are
nongovernmental organizations, their leaders say.
When they demand more censorship of online hate speech, as they are
currently doing of X, formerly Twitter, those NGOs are doing it as
free citizens and not, say, as government agents.
But the fact of the matter is that the US and other Western
governments fund ISD, the UK government indirectly funds CCDH, and,
for at least 40 years, ADL spied on its enemies and shared
intelligence with the US, Israel and other governments.
The reason all of this matters is that ADL's advertiser boycott
against X may be an effort by governments to regain the ability to
censor users on X that they had under Twitter before Musk's takeover
last November.
Internal Twitter and Facebook messages show that representatives of
the US government, including the White House, FBI, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), as well as the UK government, successfully
demanded
Facebook and
Twitter censorship of their users over the
last several years."
Censorship by
Proxy
What we have now is government censorship by proxy, a deeply
anti-American activity that has become standard practice, not just
by intelligence and national security agencies but federal agencies
of all stripes, including our public health agencies.
September 8, 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower
court's injunction,
banning,
...from
influencing social media companies to remove so-called
"disinformation." 7
According to the judges' decision, 8
"CDC officials
provided direct guidance to the platforms on the application of the
platforms' internal policies and moderation activities",
...by telling
them what was, and was not, misinformation, asking for changes to
platforms' moderation policies and directing platforms to take
specific actions.
"Ultimately, the CDC's guidance informed, if not directly affected,
the platforms' moderation decisions," the judges said, so, "although
not plainly coercive, the CDC officials likely significantly
encouraged the platforms' moderation decisions, meaning they
violated the First Amendment."
Unfortunately, as mentioned earlier,
the U.S. government is not
acting alone.
Governments around the world and international
organizations like the World Health Organization are all engaged in
censorship, and when it comes to medical information, most Big Tech
platforms are taking their lead from
the WHO.
And, if the WHO's
'pandemic' treaty 9 is enacted, then the WHO will have sole
authority to dictate 'truth'...
Everything else will be censored...
YouTube
to Ban All Types of Medical 'Misinformation'
YouTube, for example, which censored medical information that went
against CDC guidance during
the COVID 'pandemic', recently announced
it is committed to eliminating virtually all medical
"misinformation" that contradicts
the WHO: 10
"While specific medical guidance can change over time as we learn
more, our goal is to ensure that when it comes to areas of
well-studied scientific consensus, YouTube is not a platform for
distributing information that could harm people.
Moving forward, YouTube will streamline dozens of our existing
medical misinformation guidelines to fall under three categories:
-
Prevention
-
Treatment
-
Denial
These policies will apply to specific health conditions, treatments,
and substances where content contradicts local health authorities or
the World Health Organization (WHO)...
Here's what the framework
will look like:
-
Prevention
misinformation:
We will remove content that contradicts
health authority guidance on the prevention and transmission
of specific health conditions, and on the safety and
efficacy of approved vaccines.
For example, this encompasses
content that promotes a 'harmful' substance for disease
prevention.
-
Treatment
misinformation:
We will remove content that contradicts
health authority guidance on treatments for specific health
conditions...
Examples include content that encourages
unproven remedies in place of seeking medical attention for
specific conditions, like promoting cesium chloride as a
treatment for cancer.
-
Denial
misinformation:
We will remove content that disputes the
existence of specific health conditions.
This covers content
that denies
people have died from COVID-19 ...
In applying our updated
approach,
cancer treatment 'misinformation' fits the framework - the
public health risk is high as cancer is one of the leading causes of
death worldwide, there is stable consensus about safe cancer
treatments... and it's a topic that's prone to misinformation.
Starting today and ramping up in the coming weeks, we will begin
removing content that promotes cancer treatments proven to be
harmful or ineffective, or content that discourages viewers from
seeking professional medical treatment."
The UN's
War on Misinformation
The United Nations is
also deeply engaged in fighting the "'infodemic' of misinformation,"
11 and has enlisted a cadre of "rapid response" fact
checkers to counter undesirable views, wherever they appear.
The UN his also partnered with private businesses,
telecommunications companies, civil society groups, media and
individual journalists to combat misinformation.
The UN secretary-general
António Guterres has even gone on record
saying,
"hate speech" is a "weapon of war" that must be brought under
control to achieve the UN's 'peacekeeping' aims...
In July 2022, he made
the following remarks to the Security Council, clearly demonstrating
that the UN views censorship as a necessity for world peace: 12
"The United Nations must play a more deliberate role as an
information actor in conflict environments.
We must be seen as a
trusted source of information by providing engaging, factual
content, facilitating inclusive dialogue, demanding the removal of
harmful speech, calling leaders to account and promoting the voices
of peace and unity."
Just what is "harmful speech"?
Why, anything that counters
the
globalist narrative - "the voices of unity" - of course...!
In classic
Orwellian doublespeak,
UN leadership is calling dissent (i.e., "hate
speech") "a weapon of war," when in reality, censorship is the
weapon.
This kind of rhetoric alone tells you that we are in fact at war,
and the public has been declared the enemy of the globalist cabal,
the members of which have infiltrated all the key national agencies
and international organizations now being used to browbeat us into
compliance with a slave agenda...
In the video above, under-secretary-general for the UN's global
communications talks about how,
"social media is being weaponized to
provoke the worst in human nature" (there's that war lingo again),
and how the UN is "pushing Big Tech" to "bring balance to our
information systems."
In other words,
Big Tech is being pushed to give the technocrats a
battlefield edge by eliminating the "weapons" of everyday people
(who greatly outnumber them...), namely their voices...
Why Are
We Being Censored?
While globalists and technocrats would have you believe that
censorship is all about protecting people by making sure everything
they see is accurate and truthful, the exact opposite is actually
happening.
The
Deep State players (whether they recognize themselves
as belonging to that exclusive club or not) are the ones spreading
false information to lull you into compliance with an agenda that is
so utterly horrifying that no sane, rational person would ever go
along with it.
I'm talking about,
These and several other terms all refer to one
comprehensive, worldwide plot to create,
a global slave society under
the rule of a centralized world government run by unelected
technocrats.
Everything we've seen and experienced over the last three years are
part of that agenda, including the global push for
vaccine mandates.
It's no surprise then, to find out that 14 of the 17
Sustainable
Development Goals involve compulsory vaccinations...
As noted in the
August 2021 issue of Globalization and Health: 13
"Immunization directly impacts health (SDG3) and brings a
contribution to 14 out of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),
such as,
-
ending poverty
-
reducing hunger
-
reducing inequalities
Therefore, immunization is recognized to play a central role in
reaching the SDGs, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)."
Nothing is happening by accident.
It's all part of a movement toward
a global totalitarianism centered on the control and suppression of
populations...
But to get there, they must
control the flow of
information...
Truthtellers cannot be tolerated because, again, there
are billions of us, and only thousands, perhaps tens of thousands,
of them.
Once the technocratic system of control is fully in place, 24/7
surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven algorithms will keep
people in check, but until then,
the globalists need our cooperation
to install and implement the prerequisite surveillance and control
systems...
Keeping people from understanding the big picture is the
greatest weapon in their arsenal.
There's also plenty of evidence indicating they'd prefer to have far
fewer of us around, and preventing you from accessing truthful
information about health and medicine will ensure you get and stay
sick (which
is profitable for them) and ultimately die sooner rather
than later (which is the goal)...
Once you understand the grand plan, you can see,
how it's being
implemented in pieces, and why all this censorship is needed, from
their point of view...
At that point you have a decision to make...!
Go
along with their program to own you and all of your descendants, in
perpetuity.
Or take ownership of your own life and
peacefully move
in the opposite direction, toward decentralized, uncensored,
privacy-based systems of all kinds...
Video
Sources and
References
1 CIA.gov
March 13, 1967
2 The
New Yorker March 16, 2015
3 CIA.gov
July 26, 1947
4 History.state.gov
National Security Act of 1947
5 Select
Committee on Intelligence July 17, 1996
6 Public
Substack September 5, 2023
7 Yahoo!
News September 8, 2023
8 US
Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit Case 23-30445 September
8, 2023
9 Health
Policy Watch September 14, 2023
10 Blog
YouTube August 15, 2023
11 UN.org
April 30, 2020
12 UN.org
July 12, 2022
13 Globalization
and Health August 26, 2021; 17, article number 95
|